We ALL Should Be Alarmed By This!!

Philip J. Berg's lawsuit against Barack Hussein Obama was dismissed by Judge Surrick yesterday.

You can read the entire decision at Berg's blog. [Note: Scroll down to view pdf link.]

Zach Jones has a letter written in support of Berg's lawsuit that every American should read. Here is a very important except regarding this alarming decision by the judge in the case:

To those of you who may not be aware, Sen. Obama could have easily defended his eligibility to hold the U. S. Presidency by merely presenting exclusive proof of where and when he was born; and that he has never held a citizenship from another country that would nullify or call his U. S. citizenship into question. Sen. Obama chose not to answer the complaint; but instead, he chose to take the route of a legal technocrat seeking to challenge Mr. Berg’s “Standing to Sue”. When Sen. McCain was questioned about his birth certificate, he immediately presented a vault copy of his birth certificate showing the date and location of his birth, without legal hocus pocus.

“Standing to Sue” means that party has sufficient stake in an otherwise justi[f]iable controversy to obtain judicial resolution of that controversy. Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U. S. 727, 92 S. Ct. 1361, 1364, 31 L.Ed.2d 636

The Hon. R. Barclay Surrick decided Sen. Obama’s Motion to Dismiss in part on the following reasoning:

…regardless of questions of causation, the grievance remains too generalized to establish the existence of an injury in fact. To reiterate: a candidate’s ineligibility under the Natural Born Citizen Clause does not result in an injury in fact to voters. By extension, the theoretical constitutional harm experienced by voters does not change as the candidacy of an allegedly ineligible candidate progresses from the primaries to the general election…

Everyone must fully understand the meaning of Judge Surrick’s decision in dismissing Mr. Berg’s lawsuit. First, it does not mean that Sen. Obama is in any way eligible to hold the Office of the Presidency. Second, it does mean that even if everyone knew that Sen. Obama was born on the moon, it would not matter regarding the decision about Sen. Obama’s Motion to Dismiss. Judge Surrick found that a voter would not suffer enough injury by the possible election of an ineligible candidate as President to grant him or her standing to be authorized under law to bring this type of lawsuit. Third, this challenge to Sen. Obama’s eligibility is not over.

If Citizens exercising the most precious right that we have under the Constitution, in what is expected to a free and fair election process, do not have standing – who does?

This is absolutely unconscionable!!

But take heart! According to Berg's website, over 71 million people are following this story! The media of mass deception may not report about it, but the NEW MEDIA of blogs and various Internet websites ARE REPORTING ON IT!

HT's:

Zach Jones is Home

Obama Crimes

*******
P.S. The birth certificate being passed off as "real" by factcheck.org is FAKE! There are many reasons that this certificate is very suspect. One blogger asks us to consider the following information as just one example.

In 1961, the father's race would NOT have read "African" - it would have been written as "Negro" or "Colored." Remember, Obama was born in 1961 - when those terms were used! "African" wasn't used back then!

That's sounds reasonable and logical to me. If anyone can prove that "African" was used back in that era, then I stand corrected.

*******
Update: There are now 8 separate lawsuits filed against Obama's candidacy in 8 different states because of the fact that Obama's vault length GENUINE birth certificate has not been shown to any judge or the American people. Despite Judge Surrick's attempt to ignore this issue through his dismissal of Berg's case against Obama - it is NOT GOING AWAY THAT EASILY!