RepubX: WOULD THESE TWO DOCUMENTS THROW PELOSI AND TOP DEMOCRATS INTO FELONY PRISON? INSTEAD OF HIDING THEIR FRAUD UPON AMERICA?
Hat Tip:
RepubX
*******
For convenience, here is a copy of the link from previous post:
Gateway Pundit has a post up that includes a video of Glenn Beck's appearance on Fox News' "Fox and Friends" show where Glenn states, Glenn Beck Plugs This Week's Show: "You Will See Something Exposed & People Will Go To Jail" (Video)
Hat Tip:
Gateway Pundit
*******
UPDATE AT 3:34 P.M. PT ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE:
RepubX is reporting: Obama case going to trial if Oct. 5th hearing on motion to dismiss not upheld - trial wouldn't be until late January 2010!!
Cross-posted here:
Quote:
Obama case going to trial if Oct. 5th hearing on motion to dismiss not upheld - trial wouldn't be until late January 2010!!
by DefendUSx September 08, 2009 16:05
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
A California judge today tentatively scheduled a trial for Jan. 26, 2010, for a case that challenges Barack Obama's eligibility to be president based on questions over his qualifications under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.
If the case actually goes to arguments before U.S. District Judge David Carter, it will be the first time the merits of the dispute have been argued in open court, according to one of the attorneys working on the issue.
In a highly anticipated hearing today before Carter, several motions were heard, including a resolution to long-standing questions about whether attorney Orly Taitz properly served notice on the defendants, which she had.
In a second ruling, Carter ordered that attorney Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation can be added to the case to represent defendants Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, who had been removed by an earlier court order. Drake, the vice presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, and Robinson, the party's chairman, were restored as plaintiffs.
But the judge did not immediately rule on Taitz' motion to be granted discovery – that is the right to see the president's still-concealed records. Nor did Carter rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case, submitted by the U.S. government, following discussion over Taitz' challenge to the work of a magistrate in the case.
Carter ordered a hearing Oct. 5 on the motion to dismiss and ordered arguments submitted on the issue of discovery.
If the case survives that challenge, a pretrial hearing has been scheduled for Jan. 11 and the trial for two weeks later.
More to come...
Hat Tip:
RepubX
*******
ALSO, FROM THE OBAMA FILE:
From The Courtroom -- The Latest
The Give Us Liberty blog is blogging from the courtroom.
At 9:26 AM there was no visible media turnout for this hearing as in no SatCam uplink trucks.
At 10:02 Justice Carter noting the packed courtroom and overflow crowd waiting in the hallways has ordered a change to a larger courtroom and has taken a 2 hour recess to accommodate the transfer of officers of the court and spectators.
The estimated age range of those present is 18 to 80 -- 70% Men -- 30% Women -- age 60+ seems to be the majority.
Attorney Orly Taitz appeared relaxed -- calm cool and collected.Justice Carter recessed the court at 12.30 pst 9/8/09 --
his rulings:10/5/09 Defense Motion to Dismiss (MTD) to be heard -- Judge Carter indicated only a very strong compelling reason would move him to dismiss at this point.
He will review the defense's 9/4/09 MTD. He wants to hear the case on it's merits.
Discovery to be ordered 10/5/09 if Motion to Dismiss is thrown out.
1/11/10 Pre Trial Set -- procedural for other motions, depositions, scheduling, etc
1/26/10 Trial Date Set -- earliest available date for Justice Carter.
1 comment:
I've linked to your post from Jeremiah Films • Citizens for Honest Government It is a digg like community for sharing information.
I would like to invite you to join, I need more Christians.
Post a Comment