Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Israel Takes Action

Good thing that Israel is willing and able to be pro-active in defending itself. We know that BHO and his ilk [a.k.a. BADministration] won't!!

God has kept Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in charge in Israel.  Thank you Jesus!!!  When America is suffering under a wannabe tyrannical dictator like BHO, God's Providence provides the protection that Israel needs via her own competent leaders.

When BHO celebrated and championed the so-called "Arab Spring," hundreds of conservative and libertarian commentators were warning of the consequences.  Seeing the ongoing massacre in Syria where Assad's military has been instructed to kill his own people [and even use chemical weapons which were shipped there from Iraq before the war], and seeing the Muslim Brotherhood takeover of Egypt [which is against the will of the people there - btw - and they are again protesting against another tyrannical (this time, Islamist terrorist) leader in Morsi]; Israel will not wait any longer to take action in protecting Her country and her people!

We are well into end time Bible prophecy concerning "wars and rumors of wars."  Is the battle of Armageddon closer than ever?  I think so.  Whether it's months or years away, the "birth pangs" of the end times are here.  Most of the signs that we have been warned about in prophecy are happening right before our very eyes!

People...are you ready?  Are you spiritually ready?  If not, please visit this page:

Becoming a Christian

~  Christine


Blogs covering the story:

Israeli warplanes reportedly strike targets on Syria-Lebanon border; Israel on high alert over Syrian WMD
joelcrosenberg at Joel C. Rosenberg's Blog - 7 hours ago

“Israeli warplanes attacked a target on the Lebanese-Syrian border overnight Tuesday, foreign media reported on Wednesday,” according to a report in the Times of Israel. “While some reports said the purported strike was carried out on the Syrian side of the border, according to one source the target was a weapons convoy that had crossed [...]
Israeli air strike hits targets on Syria-Lebanon border
Anne Sorock at Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion - 5 hours ago
There are reports that the Israeli air force conducted an overnight air strike on targets along the Syria-Lebanon border. Although the Israel Defense Forces have declined to confirm, sources say that the targets may have been trucks carrying anti-aircraft missiles being transported to Hezbollah forces in Lebanon. Lebanese sources have reported a series of Israeli aircraft sorties in [...]

Tensions with Syria escalate. Netanyahu orders Iron Dome batteries deployed in North. Number of Israelis seeking gas masks triples.
joelcrosenberg at Joel C. Rosenberg's Blog - 3 hours ago

“Two Iron Dome batteries have been deployed in northern Israel over the past few days, the IDF said on Sunday,” reports Ynet News. “One battery of the missile-defense system was deployed in the Krayot area, while the other was installed in the Galilee region. Additional, fully operational batteries have already been deployed in the Haifa are [...]
Egyptian state headed for implosion warns Army chief
joelcrosenberg at Joel C. Rosenberg's Blog - 2 hours ago
“Residents of this Mediterranean coastal city burying their dead from Egypt’s wave of political violence vented their fury at Egypt’s Islamist president and the Muslim Brotherhood on Tuesday, demanding his ouster and virtually declaring a revolt against his rule, as the head of the military warned Egypt may collapse under the weight of its turmoil,” [...]

Hat tips to all links.

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

One Liberal Has Awakened and Smells the BHO Tyranny

I'm not quite sure what exactly set Kirsten Powers of the Fox News Channel off regarding her opinion piece entitled  Obama vs. Fox News -- behind the White House strategy to delegitimize a news organization. However, I'm glad she wrote the article and appears to have awakened from the stupor of Truman Show mentality that so many "liberals" who have previously turned a blind eye from the "progressive" [PROGRESSIVES = SOCIALISTS = COMMUNISTS = LEFT-WING RADICALS = ANTI-CAPITALISTS = UNAMERICAN...HT/ Commieblaster] descent into tyranny being forced upon America by this BADministration!


There is no war on terror for the Obama White House, but there is one on Fox News.
In a recent interview with The New Republic, President Obama was back to his grousing about the one television news outlet in America that won’t fall in line and treat him as emperor. Discussing breaking Washington's partisan gridlock, the president told TNR,"If a Republican member of Congress is not punished on Fox News...for working with a Democrat on a bill of common interest, then you’ll see more of them doing it."

Alas, the president loves to whine about the media meanies at Fox News. To him, these are not people trying to do their jobs. No, they are out to get him. What other motive could a journalist have in holding a president accountable? Why oh why do Ed Henry and Chris Wallace insist on asking hard questions? Make them stop!
Alas, the president loves to whine about the media meanies at Fox News. To him, these are not people trying to do their jobs. No, they are out to get him.

The president seems more comfortable talking to "real journalists" such as Chris Hughes, who asked the question in the TNR interview that elicited Obama's reflexive Fox hatred. Hughes is the new owner of TNR and is a former major Obama campaign donor and organizer who was featured on the cover of Fast Company, with the headline, "The Kid Who Made Obama President." You can't make this stuff up.

This latest volley from the president is just one in a long line of comments from his White House as part of their campaign to silence any dissent they detect in the press. corps 
Recently, the White House has kept Fox News off of conference calls dealing with the Benghazi attack, despite Fox News being the only outlet that was regularly reporting on it and despite Fox having top notch foreign policy reporters.

Read it all: Obama vs. Fox News -- behind the White House strategy to delegitimize a news organization.

Perhaps this not-so-little fact made Powers' blood boil:

A Media Matters memo found its way into the public domain and if you care at all about decency and freedom of the press, it will make you throw up. If you like McCarthyism, it’s right up your alley. It details to liberal donors how they have plans to assemble opposition research on Fox News employees.'s true! The typical Marxist + Alinsky Rules for Radicals + Cloward Piven strategy is not only used against the BADministration's so-called "enemies" [e.g. Christians, Conservatives, Republicans, TEA Party Patriots, those who support the U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence etc.]; it is EVENTUALLY used against some of their own - especially when their peon "useful idiot" status is no longer needed!

Hey Kirsten!  Can't say your buddies at Fox News didn't warn you!

Most thinking, propaganda rejecting, and wisdom filled Americans [i.e. those who voted for Romney] already know what a lying, sniveling, petty, divisive, argumentative, hateful, spiteful, propaganda spewing, wasteful spending, job-killing, black vs. white instigating, rich vs. poor hating, whining, and constant ridiculous campaigner BHO is.

It is certainly good to see someone like Kirsten Powers finally open her eyes!

We need to see how many more Americans will finally wake up and see the danger of BHO's latest attack on America via the next battle of the day:   Cloward-Piven 101: Obama To Grant Amnesty To 11,000,000 Illegal Aliens .

Hat Tips:

Fox News
Now The End Begins

Monday, January 28, 2013

News Roundup

No surprise that the media-of-mass-corruption's malpractice after Hillary's Benghazi testimony continues. (see links below)

Monday Catch-Up: More Media Malpractice on Benghazi
nicedeb at Nice Deb - 24 minutes ago
Big Journalism is all over that sham of an interview Obama and Hillary gave to Steve Kroft of 60 Minutes, Sunday. If you spared yourselves the frustration of watching it, John Nolte and Larry O’Conner can fill you in. It was as precisely as pathetic as you thought it would be. John Nolte: Martha Raddatz, [...]
Hillary Gives Away the Game
American Thinker - 11 hours ago
During her Benghazi testimony last week, all at once, before the whole world, one of the highest ranking progressive authoritarians on the planet spilled the beans -- all of them -- about the left's modus operandi.
Video: Judge Jeanine Pirro Hails Hillary’s “Washington Side Step”
nicedeb at Nice Deb - 20 hours ago
After confiding that she took dance classes as a girl, Jeanine Pirro feels qualified to spot a good dancer when she sees one. “There is one woman who can reeeeally dance,” Pirro purred, as she introduced the “What difference does it make!” clip from Hillary’s Senate testimony, last week. “She can do a two step [...]
In addition, those who voted for BHO a second time (especially if they call themselves Christians) should be absolutely ashamed for going against God's truth in the Bible in order to elect a tyrant into office for a second time!
Did God Exalt Obama to the Presidency?
American Thinker - 1 day ago
If you're a believer who takes the Bible seriously, you have asked yourself this question many times.
In a world filled with sin, immorality, lies, evil, death, and confusion, it is good to know that:
GOD'S WORD IS FOUND IN THE BIBLE AND THE BIBLE ALONE. The truth in the Bible is not subject to affirmation by a majority vote.


Memory Hole Blog has a new post up where an inquisitive couple visits Newtown, Connecticut seeking answers. You might want to go there, view the photos and the commentary.


My partner and I became fed up with the mainstream media’s depiction of what took place in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14, 2012. So on January 20 we traveled there from our home in Ottawa Canada in an effort to visit the sites and respectfully approach the locals.

Before we even got off the highway there was a display of dozens of American flags on the shoulder. There is a large tented memorial located just off the freeway. The tent had a sign on the outside, “Sandy Hook Memorial Never Forgotten.” Inside the tent was a chaplain who asked that I not take any photos. There were hundreds of stuffed animals and candles as well as children’s art from around the country–if not the world. Inside was also a donation jar that was at mid-afternoon close to full of money. We signed one of the boards with condolences from Canada. I saw adults and children inside the tent on the two visits we made. No one was there who was impacted directly. I asked the chaplain if she had seen any children whom had been impacted. She did not answer.
One of the more creepy excerpts:

We sat at the 100 Church Hill Restaurant for a couple of hours. There were about 10 people inside. There were about 100 drawings from children from around the country (if not the world) offering condolences and well wishes. No one was talking about these. My partner and I spoke with a couple in their early twenties for an hour or so. They were life long locals. Eventually they asked why we were in Newtown and we told them we had heard of their tragedy. They did not comment further and we did not push the issue. Later, I mentioned that I had read online where some people had suggested that Newtown might have a lively Satanic community. One of the two locals remarked, “I could believe that.”

Read the rest and view the photos:

Memory Hole Blog: An Inquisitive Couple’s Visit to Newtown, Connecticut

January 28, 2013 · 9:00 am
Photos and Commentary by Scott DeLarm
Edited by James F. Tracy


My response:

Some observations.
When this visiting couple questioned the chaplain if she had seen any children whom had been impacted…why wouldn’t she answer? That is just evidence of even more suspicious secrecy surrounding this event.

About that handwritten sign that says, “there is no foot so tiny that it can’t leave an imprint on this world.” Too bad they don’t feel the same way about the millions of tiny feet who have been aborted in the womb.

I ask. Is such a sign as the “foot so tiny” one the first (or second, or third, or fourth) thought that one would genuinely have and desire to display after such a tragedy such as this? Seems quite strange to me.

The “we’re with you Newtown” sign from “your friends in Tucson, Arizona” seems very strange! “We’re with you” sounds more like a cheer sign one would read at a sporting event – not after a tragedy where 26 were murdered!

The second “no entry beyond this point” sign misspelled “prosecuted.” Who made that blunder?

When a local is asked about “Satanic activity” and replies “I could believe that,” then we know that it isn’t just a conspiracy theory to think that enormous evil surrounds this town and ultimately, this entire scenario.

Masonry has it’s own kind of “magic and spells” which are of the occult; which is of the devil, as well. [Update note:  I read elsewhere that "Freemasons" are often involved in child sex trafficking.  Need to find that link again and post it here.  Makes me so sick to my stomach...]

What is with the “Shh…co.” imagery with the heart inside the hand? Is that a coded message for the residents to keep their mouths shut or what?

The newspaper lady admitted that she knew of “conspiracy theories floating out there.” Isn’t it strange that she would send people to It’s a far left liberal website that can easily say what it wants instead of seeking the truth in any matter.

The female sergeant is just regurgitating the same old lines.

Why weren’t there any photos of the inside of the school released? There were after Columbine.
Why the rush to demolish the school? Hide the evidence (or lack thereof) if, in fact, a hoax was perpetrated??

All of this is very eerie…and creepy…to say the least!

P.S. Were there any churches involved in the memorial site placements after this tragedy? Besides what appears to be one back yard memorial with small crosses, everything else seems too “secular” in the aftermath of this terrible even.t
Also, a chaplain could be a person of any belief system and is not the same thing as a pastor, priest, or rabbi.


Update:  My friend Steve has a video up over at Cry and Howl that exposes the fact that ABC, CBS, NBC Admit No Assault Rifle Used at Sandy Hook


Hat tips to all links.

For more information that the media of mass deception isn't covering, please see these sites:

  Sites Investigating Sandy Hook Shooting

Saturday, January 26, 2013

BHO: War Monger and Lying "Lord of the Flies"

The other day, I had a brief discussion with my husband regarding BHO.  I told him that all BHO wants to do is campaign for his terrible agenda and do everything possible to rip apart the GOP.  He doesn't lead this country.  His goal is to pulverize his opponents.  And, the few conservative commentators out there in radio and TV land who are onto this scheme are currently trying to get conservatives to not give up the fight. [Update:  But as my friend Steve tells us in his latest post, why didn't they stand up and expose BHO for the fraud that he is way back in 2008??]

I didn't listen to BHO's speech when he was inaugurated.  I just couldn't stomach the debacle.  But over the past several days since then, I have heard portions of the speech that should be alarming to anyone who isn't an ObamaBorgBot.

Received an email from Brent Bozell (who appears on Hannity's TV show on a regular basis) that is right on the mark concerning the "love" affair of the liberal media "elites" and BHO.  In his letter, Bozell mentions the Newsweek cover depicting BHO as "The Second Coming."  In my previous blog post entitled About That "Second Coming" Reference I shared my thoughts on the subject.

Well, if BHO is considered to be "lord" of anything, then perhaps we could give him the title lord of the flies? Yes! That's it! The lord of the flies - AND LIES!

At least the fly-lord has FINALLY been found guilty of violating the U.S. Constitution when he illegally made appointments To The NLRB.

Back to the subject of this post.

The following is a copy of Brent Bozell's email letter:

Dear Christine,

Newsweek stopped its print edition at the end of 2012, but they still tried to scandalize the country by producing a fake cover honoring Obama's second inauguration as "The Second Coming." This absurd attempt at myth-making is a natural progression. The "cover" story was written by Evan Thomas, who proclaimed on MSNBC a few years ago that Obama was "sort of like God" in being above the gritty political fray.

It was just as absurd when Newsweek writer David Frum, the formerly conservative Bush speechwriter, tweeted this piece of media-elite nonsense: "First term Obama: punchee, 2nd term Obama, puncher."

No one calling himself a "political observer" can say Obama was some sort of mute victim, consistently under fire, on defense over the last four years. Quote Obama from anywhere, and he's fiercely bashing the GOP. In April 2011, he said the House GOP budget plan would force "poor children," "children with autism," and "kids with disabilities" to "fend for themselves." In another 2011 speech, he described the Republican plan as "let's have dirtier air, dirtier water, less people with health insurance."

These aren't even the Obama-Biden 2012 TV ads. They were pure gutter sleaze.

In truth, the media elites want Obama to destroy conservatives. Too far-fetched, you say? published an article by John Dickerson on January 18 headlined "Go for the Throat! Why if he wants to transform American politics, Obama must declare war on the Republican Party."

This "reporter" is the political director of CBS News. The spirit of Dan Rather remains.

Dickerson said Obama doesn't want to rest on his first-term laurels. So "Obama's only remaining option is to pulverize. Whether he succeeds in passing legislation or not, given his ambitions, his goal should be to delegitimize his opponents." He needs "clarifying fights over controversial issues," so "he can force Republicans to either side with their coalition's most extreme elements or cause a rift in the party that will leave it, at least temporarily, in disarray."

We're informed that "extreme" conservatism, as defined by the Tea Party or the NRA, should be "illegitimate." This is precisely what CBS was selling about Ronald Reagan 32 years ago. Dickerson wants Obama to be liberal enough to spur "more tin-eared, dooming declarations of absolutism like those made by conservatives who sought to define the difference between legitimate and illegitimate rape – and handed control of the Senate to Democrats along the way."

In imagining a slow political suicide of the American right, Dickerson isn't so much out in front of Obama as helpfully channeling Obama. On Saturday's "Early Show" on CBS, Dickerson explained Obama's thinking: "We heard in his press conference this week – which is, confrontation has to be the order of the day. He's tried to work with Republicans and as he said, you know, I could have more parties with them but it doesn't change the way they behave."

It's preposterous that a "journalist" would say all this. It is mind-boggling to consider he actually believes this.

Another CBS star, Bob Schieffer, demonstrated the media's impatience with anything but a fervently leftist Obama in a second term. After the president made a speech for more gun control, Schieffer leaned on history to insist that beating the "gun lobby" has to be easier than killing Osama bin Laden or "defeating the Nazis."

Schieffer argued, "the president is going to have to do more than just make a speech about it. This is one of the best speeches I've ever heard him deliver, but it's going to take more than that from the White House. He's going to have to get his hands dirty."

Liberal journalists don't want lofty oratory in the second term. They want conservatives defeated and "delegitimized." They want a smash-mouth Obama who accomplishes their agenda of "responding to the threat of climate change," and marriages for our "gay brothers and sisters" in all 50 states, and amnesty for "bright young students" so they "will be enlisted in our workforce rather than expelled from our country." All of these and more were promised to liberals in Obama's second inaugural address.

Richard Stevenson at The New York Times passed along the Orwellian echo of Obama's "unapologetic argument that modern liberalism was perfectly consistent with the spirit of the founders."


L. Brent Bozell III
Founder and President
Media Research Center
How apropos that the rag mag NewsWEAK would end its print edition (Yay!  About time!!) with a photo of the lord-of-the-flies BHO and trying to depict him as someone even remotely close to anything (or Anyone) godly!  It has to be one of the most ironic things I've ever seen the liberal left lunatics try to do with their commie puppet pResident who still continues to squat illegally in the people's White House.

Liberals are existing in their own kind of "Truman Show" where they think that what is being depicted on TV is true and that the delegitimization of BHO's opponents will somehow defeat conservatism in the United States of America.  There may be many "Trumans" out there, still not aware of the reality behind the false scenery and evil agenda of BHO, that the media of mass deception continue to perpetuate. However, more and more will finally catch on to what is really going on and want to get out from under the tyranny.

We need to keep sounding the alarms about the dangers of this Marxist/Islamo-
Fascist  parade towards tyranny of our people and continue to pray, work, and watch for opportunities to share the truth.

Hat tips:

Cry and Howl
Klein Online
End Times Blogspot
Nice Deb
Media Research Center





Tuesday, January 22, 2013

About That "Second Coming" Reference

Yesterday, I watched C-Span's pre-inaugural call-in show for about 15 minutes.  It was all I could stand.  The "pro-BHO" calls, newspaper articles, tweets etc. were running about 4-1 in favor of BHO compared to those presented in opposition.   I shouldn't be surprised.  Just like the rest of the media of mass corruption,  C-Span had long ago been taken over by the Commies!

One Republican caller stated that he would be cleaning out his attic instead of watching the spectacle of Marxist blathering that would be going on at the event.  Ha!  Time well spent!

I didn't listen to BHO's speech, but this morning, Fox News had a few clips and there was so much divisiveness in it!  It shows that the masquerade that BHO presented to the OBorgBots is no longer needed.  He can reveal his true evil self now.  Once again, it made me grieve for our nation.

Newsweek had a cover of a profile of BHO with "the second coming" written underneath. 

Know what?

 The BHO admiration society lemmings may not realize it now; but they just don't get how much more awful their destiny is about to become under the coming tyranny.

Believing that BHO is a "messiah" is so laughable. It is also very creepy! Most thinking people who haven't been hypnotized by this fraud already know what a communist and radical Islamist sympathizer he is!!

I haven't read the article that accompanies the Newsweek cover with BHO on it. However, I do think that the reference to the "second coming" of BHO (if compared to Jesus Christ) contains a not-so-hidden message from the far left lunatics that could be considered to be quite scary.

While reading a devotional this morning, a connection was made by me.

As Christian believers we "groan within ourselves, eagerly waiting for the adoption, the redemption of our body" (See Romans 8:23)

This place is not our home.

Jesus told us that "in this world we will have trouble." We are strangers in a strange land, and the closer we get to the end times the more evident this becomes.

When we go back into the Old Testament, prophets had the pieces to the prophetic puzzle but they didn't always see the completed picture like Bible believing and studying Christians can, and do.

For example, when Jesus quoted from the book of Isaiah 61:1-2 in the synagogue in Nazareth (Luke 4:16-19), He quoted all the passage except the part about "the day of vengeance of our God" since that would be fulfilled at His Second Coming, not His first. Isaiah saw both parts of the Messiah's ministry--good news and judgment--but didn't see the separation between the two.

Fortunately, we have the advantage of hindsight of both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible that gives us the completed picture. The full circle, if you will, of Jesus Christ is that He was first  born into this world to give us a life that's forgiven, and raised to give us a life that's forever.

His body was sown perishable, but was raised imperishable.

It was sown in dishonor, but was raised in glory.

It was sown in weakness but raised in power.

I would venture to say that BHO's first political "coming" as pResident in 2008 was the complete opposite.

He was born to eventually be ushered in as a tyrannical leader and give America a life that's divisive between white vs. black, rich vs. poor, Christian vs. Muslim, Jewish vs. Muslim, liberal vs. conservative, moral vs. immoral, and ultimately extremely harmful towards what our Founders envisioned.  His political "second coming" will be more of the same, but even worse!  The vengeance of BHO (which was a favorite topic in his campaign speeches) against Americans he disagrees with has not even begun!

BHO is virulently destructive to our U.S. Constitution. He tramples upon it and disregards the fact that our nation was born as a Judeo/Christian one; and our Declaration of Independence was written as a result of the Founders desire to follow the Ten Commandments in the Bible.

If the left wants to think of BHO as their "messiah," how terribly disappointed they will be when they finally realize that BHO's body, mind, soul, and spirit was sown perishable (and remains that way unless he repents of his sins and turns from his reprobate mindset) and his ideology is "nothing new under the sun" but a throw-back to tyrants of death from history.   He will use them, then dispose of them when their useful-idiot status is no longer needed.

BHO was raised into the political world in secular humanistic "glory" (which never lasts) but will one day be sown in eternal dishonor.

BHO appears to have been raised into the political world of secular humanism in power, but will one day be sown into an ultimate, never-ending hell of weakness.

BHO will inevitably one day be raised imperishable in order to face judgment. The trouble is, without genuine belief in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, BHO will join all of those who out rightly reject Jesus Christ and will appear at the White Throne Judgment. It is a judgment where each sinner who has died has done so with their own sins on their soul. Spending eternity in separation from God leaves a person vulnerable to the pain of experiencing death that never ends. Recall the story of Lazarus and the rich king.

 Only the born again believers in Christ will face the Judgment Seat of Christ and be able to say that belief in Christ's sacrificial death and His forgiveness for their sins has saved them from the judgment of eternal hell fire. Because of Christ's sacrifice, we can claim the words of the hymnist as our own:

 "Living, He loved me; dying He saved me; buried He carried my sins far away; rising He justified freely forever; one day He's coming--O glorious day" (Wilber Chapman, 1908).

In another prophetic portion of Scripture from the Old Testament, we read in Numbers 24:17 -

I see Him, but not now; I behold Him, but not near; a Star shall come out of Jacob; a Scepter shall rise out of Israel...

Dr. David Jeremiah writes:

Jesus is called a "Star" three times in Scripture. In Numbers 24, Balaam predicted a Messiah in the far future, rising like a star from the descendants of Jacob. Second Peter 1:19 talks about the Morning Star rising in our hearts. And in Revelation 22:16, Jesus called Himself "the Bright and Morning Star."

In astronomy, the bright and morning star is not literally a star, but the planet Venus that appears in the eastern sky just before dawn and is one of the brightest objects in the sky.  The sight of this "star" is a sign that night is nearly over.

It's symbolic of Christ.  The dark epoch of earth's history is nearly past.  Soon the Lord will rise from His throne like the Star of Morning, ushering in an eternal day for His children.  Just as He came the first time, so He will come again.  And we "do well to heed as a light that shines in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your heart"  (2 Peter 1:19).

Hat tips:

Nice Deb
Blue Letter Bible


As I was writing this post, I heard about this:

Most brilliant speech writer ever uses “peace in our time” in his historic world-changing speech
William A. Jacobson at Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion - 30 minutes ago

I missed this when reading Obama’s inaugural speech (still haven’t listened to it). I just heard Jonah Goldberg make reference to it on Special Report with Bret Baier. Via Tom Ricks at Foreign Policy Blog, Obama’s 2nd inaugural address: ‘Peace in our time’? Really, Mr. President? The WTF moment for me in Obama’s second inaugural address, [...]
Neville Chamberlain???  Anyone???


Also see:

Obama reads the Constitution like a Chinese menu
Joel Engel at Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion - 2 hours ago

As soon as the president began his inaugural address yesterday with a nod to the Constitution, I actually said aloud, “Uh-oh.” Each time we gather to inaugurate a President we bear witness to the enduring strength of our Constitution…. As feared, the speech devolved into a laundry list of leftist initiatives disguised as Constitutional obligations [...]

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Hypocrisy Of Gun Control Advocates Revealed

Project Veritas has the greatest video out which demonstrates the absolute hypocrisy of the progressive lefties who spout virulent rhetoric (and newspapers that out the location of the homes of gun owners) against gun owner rights to keep our Constitutional guaranteed Second Amendment Rights to own and carry firearms for protection.


Project Veritas' founder, James O'Keefe remarked, "Our nation's children spend the majority of their week within schools that are starkly emblazoned with signs that read 'Gun Free Zone.' Project Veritas put that same concept to the test with some of America's most fervent advocates for gun control."

Organizing as Citizens Against Senseless Violence, Project Veritas' citizen journalists went door-to-door in New York, New Jersey and Washington, D.C. to see which outspoken champions for Gun Control would be willing to declare their own home as a "Gun Free Zone" by placing a sign on their lawn.

O'Keefe continued, "It's amazing to see members of our media equivocate and contradict their spoken and written words when faced with the dilemma to declare their own homes as Gun Free. Surprisingly, we found that the homes of the very New York paper that was willing to put the lives and fortunes of gun owners at risk by publishing their names and addresses, were also the most heavily armed and protected. The hypocrisy of New York's Journal News is beyond words."

Read it all HERE

See video at: The Project Veritas

From Project Veritas:

The fact is that the majority of our nation's children spend almost every day TRAPPED inside schools that are proudly emblazoned with signs reading "Gun Free Zone."
But when Project Veritas offered that same opportunity to some of America's most fervent advocates for gun control they REFUSED. If it's good enough for children, why isn't it good enough for them?

While the video above is entertaining, it is also very telling as to the state of hypocrisy in our media.

Some quotes from the video when homeowners were asked if they would put a sign up on their lawn that reads, "This Home Is Proudly Gun Free":

"I appreciate what you're doing but will pass on the sign."

"I agree with you but don't want the sign on my lawn."

Hat tips:

The Steady Drip Blog [where I first viewed the video]

Project Veritas

Friday, January 18, 2013

Golden Opportunity to Depose Obama?

I would like to thank Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel of Moral for adding Talk Wisdom to his blog roll! I am humbled and honored.

Today's Moral guest commentary is written by Chris Farrell.


Guest Commentary:

“Supreme Court Justice Roberts has a golden opportunity to depose Obama” by Chris Farrell

In light of the fact that Chief Justice Roberts has referred the case, (12A606) “Edward Noonan et al., v The Calif. Sec. of State, Deborah Bowen,” to a full conference to be held on February 15th, the perfect opportunity to defeat the ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa’s assault on the 2nd Amendment is at hand.

‘The best defense is a good offense!” The Chief Justice must be persuaded to take up the case and render a decision which retro-actively abrogates the illegal election of a constitutionally ineligible candidate who fraudulently represented himself as eligible to be president. Even now Mr. Obama proceeds in a cover-up of unparalleled magnitude forging official documents and paying law firms millions of dollars to keep his true background hidden.

Consider the following: Could Chief Justice Roberts have been defensively posturing for the blow-back, the “black-lash” if you please, of a decision he may have realized would be necessary to make in the future on Mr. Obama’s purported constitutional eligibility when he ruled so surprisingly on Obamacare?

Could the Chief Justice be about to shock the Hell out of the world and rule against Obama as being constitutionally eligible to be president on February 15, 2013?

In the hope that this albeit far-fetched scenario is a possibility, is the NRA or the Republican Party making any effort to promote such a decision by the Supreme Court which would be the best outcome in defense of the Second Amendment?

Might not the Chief Justice have been positioning himself and the Supreme Court as apparently not being antagonistically inclined towards Mr. Obama so as to insulate them both from certain to arise liberal charges of racism should a decision need to be rendered by the court on the issue of constitutional eligibility which would pronounce that Mr. Obama is not now and never has been eligible to be president?
Read the rest at
The is on the case, too:

Wouldn't it be great if that scenario came true??

I know - even the author (Chris Ferrell at moral states this as possibly being a "far-fetched scenario."  However, all of the other cases that have been dismissed because of "lack of standing" apparently have resulted from a false concept (and type of cheating) used by attorneys and judges!  It's all a smokescreen and just a canard!

The Concept of Standing Used by Attorneys and Judges is a Canard - ©Bridgette@WTPOTUS 2013 A History of “Standing” 4 Multiple nationwide lawsuits against Obama citing his ineligibility were dismissed because of lack of standing...

Update:   At we have the word origin and history meaning of "canard":

Word Origin & History

before 1850, from Fr. canard "a hoax," lit. "a duck" (from O.Fr. quanart, probably echoic of a duck's quack); said by Littré to be from the phrase vendre un canard à moitié "to half-sell a duck," thus, from some long-forgotten joke, "to cheat."
Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2010 Douglas Harper
"To cheat"... seems quite the fitting kind of word when it comes to describing the life of BHO!

If this doesn't pan out, then perhaps the release of the Fast and Furious documents might end up being his downfall?

Dangerous Gun Runner Eric Holder Says We Will Go After Gun Traffickers While He's Begging Court to Halt Fast and Furious Documents Release

Or, maybe the truth about Benghazi will finally come to light?

FBI Director Finally Gets Around to Looking at Benghazi

Or, maybe this:

Impeachment Coming If Obama Issues Exec Order



Hat tips:

And all additional links.

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Painting of Obama Trampling Constitution

According to my stats page, 171 hits (as of 1/17/13 at 12:19 p.m. PT) have come over to this blog from Face Book to view a painting by Jon McNaughton that depicts Obama trampling on our U.S. Constitution!  The link below is a blog post that I did back in February, 2012.  There are more paintings to view, and also a video at the link.

Painting of Obama Trampling Constitution Resurfaces, Artist‘s New Work Tells ’Enslaved‘ Americans to ’Wake Up!’

I think that BHO's 23 gun-grabbing, unconstitutional executive orders yesterday have absolutely outraged a A LOT OF PEOPLE!!!


Some may already be familiar with the image featured above. For those who aren’t, it is painting titled “The Forgotten Man” which features President Obama trampling on the Constitution while an astonished James Madison pleads with him to stop. To the side, a man sits on a park bench in the throes of depression while 43 presidents look on. The painting, which uses discarded dollar bills and scraps of paper with individual constitutional amendments scrawled onto them.

He explained that the man on the park bench “represents every man, woman, and child who is an American“ and who ”hopes to find the American dream of happiness and prosperity.” The artist added, “But now because of unconstitutional acts imposed on the American people by our government we stand on the precipice of disasters.”

Original Hat tip: The

Would The U.S. Gov. Knowingly Tell Lies To Its People To Promote Their Agenda?

I know...sounds like a silly question.  After all that we have seen in the BHO BADministration, the answer to THAT question is YES THEY WOULD!  However, do we know why they could get away with it all?

With the blatant cover-ups of Fast and Furious, and the 9/11/12 Benghazi attack, why shouldn't the public question all of the inconsistencies, strange interviews, secrecy, weird photos, crisis actors and events surrounding the Sandy Hook tragedy?

While reading comments over at Professor Tracy's Memory Hole Blog I ran across a comment that propelled me to do some additional research.

Here is a copy of the comment:


I think it’s also important to mention the fact that Government Propaganda/Psychological Warfare against the American People has been legalized via NDAA, has been added to the bigger picture and cannot be disregarded when these issues are discussed and considered. Smith-Mundt Has Been Modernized.

One thing that caught my attention in the Medical Examiner’s press conference video was his acknowledgement that this case would be handled differently than others he’s worked on, and more importantly his assuredness that he wouldn’t have to worry about any pending/future court proceedings.

I thought to myself “20 children died while in the custody of a public institution and out of the presence of their parents. Does Mr. Carver not know that these same parents as well as the rest of the public also have access to the courts? And given the circumstances, one could expect a grieving parent or parents to file a lawsuit demanding some form of accountability, because I wouldn’t expect all the parents to be taking this as good as Robbie Parker has been.
The link within the above comment tells us that: Smith-Mundt Has Been Modernized. What is Smith-Mundt? Well that link is supposed to inform us. However, I needed to learn more about Smith-Mundt and the NDAA connection.

At the end of the first article Smith-Mundt Has Been Modernized. (which was unsatisfying for me and didn't give enough information) there are additional links:

Related posts:
  1. New Law Ends Smith-Mundt Ban On Domestic Dissemination Of Content
  2. Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 introduced in the House
  3. Public Diplomacy: The most unsettling section of the Smith-Mundt "modernization bill"
  4. Critics Fret About Smith-Mundt Modernization Act
  5. When do we start the honest debate over the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act?
I clicked on the first one, and then the fourth one.

The following essay gives us a better explanation of what this new law is really all about. It would appear that the author (based on his last sentence) is concerned about this new law.

 Copy of related post # 1:

John Brown Notes and Essays blog: Sunday, January 6, 2013 New Law Ends Smith-Mundt Ban On Domestic Dissemination Of Content

President Barack Obama this week signed into law a provision that lifts a nearly 65-year ban on domestic distribution of BBG content. But for BBG broadcasters, it’s business as usual…

As part of a defense authorization bill signed this week by the President, a World War II era [I would say early Cold-War era - JB] ban on domestic dissemination of BBG content was lifted.

Generally known as the Smith-Mundt Act, after its sponsors, a portion of the 1948 law prevented content intended for global audiences from being broadcast or distributed in the United States. It was intended, in part, to prevent what were then wartime overseas propaganda efforts from being directed toward U.S. citizens.

Worth noting, there is much more to Smith-Mundt than the domestic dissemination ban – much of it beneficial to U.S. international broadcasting.

However, much has changed since the Cold War, making the domestic dissemination ban portion of Smith-Mundt less necessary, and even potentially problematic.

For example, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, originally a CIA-funded entity, left that agency in 1972, found its way into the United States Information Agency, which was ultimately spun into the Broadcasting Board of Governors. That’s a brief history, but one meant to show the evolution toward its current situation — one guarded by a firewall intended to protect its journalistic integrity.

Radio Martí joined VOA and RFE/RL in 1985, along with Radio Free Asia in 1996, and Middle East Broadcasting Networks eight years later.

As content offerings grew, so did requests for that content from a rising number of U.S.-based ethnic broadcasters serving diaspora populations. Under the domestic dissemination ban, those requests, which ranged from Sudanese broadcasters in Minnesota to Cuban community broadcasters in Miami, were officially denied. The truth is, however, that many ethnic broadcasters used them regardless.

As internet distribution became available, keeping a lid on BBG content in the U.S. became even more difficult. The BBG could certainly geocode the content to prevent U.S. audiences from accessing it, but censoring the internet in a country with a founding tenet of freedom of the press was seen as a non-starter.

But even geocoding would not be the end of it. VOA Russian, for example, can be seen almost daily in New York City as local cable channel operators import Russian-language channels from overseas.

Enforcing the Smith-Mundt dissemination ban would become akin to a game of whac-a-mole.

In 2010, the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act was introduced, intended to lift the ban but not repeal the entire act. The Act was reintroduced in 2011, with a similar provision finally passing and signed on January 2, 2013. Lifting the ban was one of the goals set forth in the BBG’s most recent strategic plan.

For broadcasters, the change means little on a day-to-day basis – other than they need to worry less about their content popping up in the U.S.

Still, no money can be used to create content directed at domestic audiences, and there are no plans to measure any domestic audiences that may occur. [given this restriction, is the headline to this announcement quite correct? - JB]


The #4 related post is entitled Critics Fret About Smith-Mundt Modernization Act. This particular author tells about the concern of the critics, but doesn't seem to be on board with their concerns.


The House of Representatives has been working to amend the laws that govern the dissemination of “propaganda” materials in the U.S. What seemed like a good idea to me and others–one long overdue–is being spun by some observers as a dark effort by the DoD and State Department who want authorization to brainwash Americans.

Last night Buzzfeed posted an article claiming that the changes were being quietly inserted into a defense authorization bill. However, as Matt Armstrong reported, the changes were also part of a stand-alone bill (H.R. 5736) introduced last week. I confess I am no expert on the arcania of legislative machinery, but the fact that this bill was introduced a week ago and published by the Library of Congress–then later attached to the defense bill–strikes me as more of a procedural move than an effort to sneak something through.

In a further effort to build a sinister narrative, Buzzfeed frets that this is some sort of effort to enable unfettered psychological operations by the military and government on the U.S. population. Assorted quotes from the article:
The bill’s supporters say the informational material used overseas to influence foreign audiences is too good to not use at home, and that new techniques are needed to help fight Al-Qaeda, a borderless enemy whose own propaganda reaches Americans online.
The new law would give sweeping powers to the State Department and Pentagon to push television, radio, newspaper, and social media onto the U.S. public.
“Senior public affairs” officers within the Department of Defense want to “get rid” of Smith-Mundt and other restrictions because it prevents information activities designed to prop up unpopular policies—like the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
I am not a legal expert, and I suppose changes could have these kinds of consequences if not made carefully. But I doubt these these are the intended outcomes.

The author ends his post by saying:

Unintentional domestic dissemination is one thing, but what about more intentional efforts critics are claiming this legislation would enable? The language in the House bill seems clear enough that it only applies to “materials prepared for dissemination abroad” and does not in any way authorize expenditures for targeted influence of domestic audiences.

Despite the fact that author Steven R. Corman seems to pooh-pooh the concerns, his update is filled with more articles of individual writers being HIGHLY concerned about this!!   There are also "progressive" opinions at some of the links where we are being told that there is nothing to worry about.

My question.

If the Sandy Hook shooting was indeed a false flag operation and/or psy-ops "drill" that went awry, can it be that due to this new law it would actually be considered "legal" for the BHO BADministration to do that???

Scary thought...isn't it?

After all, it has given BHO the ability to surround himself with children while he signs 23 executive orders regarding gun control.  However, the fake "letters" from the children were so obviously coerced by adults.  Using children in your propaganda agenda is absolutely disgusting!!  Well, other Marxists like Stalin and National Socialists (Nazis) like Hitler did it too!

I am continually amazed at the lengths these evil tyrants will go to stomp on our Constitutional rights through pressing their hateful rhetoric, obvious propaganda,  and hated Marxist agenda upon our Constitutional Republic!  More Americans need to wake up and smell the tyranny!

Talk Wisdom Reports - You Decide

~ Christine


Update May 23
This story continues to generate buzz. Here is a selection of recent opinion:
  • NDAA 2013: Congress approves domestic deceptive propaganda (, Russian “anonymous nonprofit organization.” Hmm.) Reauthorizing the indefinite detention of US citizens without charge might be the scariest provision in next year’s defense spending bill, but it certainly isn’t the only one worth worrying about. An amendment tagged on the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 would allow for the United States government to create and distribute pro-American propaganda within the country’s own borders under the alleged purpose of putting al-Qaeda’s attempts at persuading the world against Western ideals on ice.
  • Democrat Defends “Propaganda” Bill (Rebecca Elliot, BuzzFeed) Rep. Adam Smith from Washington championed the defense bill amendment that will “strike the current ban on domestic dissemination” of propaganda in an interview with Salon’s Glenn Greenwald earlier today.Repealing the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 is “not about trying to influence domestic audiences,” Smith emphaized. Rather, he intends the amendment to free up current restrictions placed on foreign information campaigns.
  • U.S. declares propaganda war on citizens (David Pruitt, The Alestle). I can appreciate security, and I’m sure some good arguments could be brought forward for a change in the policy. However, the government’s sexy smile and little wink does nothing to reassure me of any noble intentions. I have grown tired of overused phrases like “you can trust me” and “everybody else is doing it.” The government has a major image problem when it comes to being considered trustworthy. It would be just a matter of time before a self-serving politician used the bill to start another war or bail out another bank and tell us — well, whatever.
  • Smith-Mundt Modernization: Better Late than Never (Helle Dale, Heritage). Critics have already voiced concerns that this will open the floodgates of propaganda by the U.S. government. This is hardly likely. Indeed, access to programs and materials produced by the State and the BBG will allow Congress and the public a better understanding of what we are funding. Much of it is high-quality journalism, which deserves support, and some programming could have a positive impact on certain immigrant communities in the United States that are vulnerable to radicalization. As for programming and materials that are controversial, questionable, or wasteful, doesn’t the U.S. public deserve to know what is being published or broadcast in its name?
  • Are Government’s ‘Strategic Communications’ Coming to American Airwaves? (Rachel Marsden, Townhall). I see. So the Smith-Mundt Act was strictly limited to countering communist propaganda overseas, because the idea of conducting government propaganda operations within a country at a time when Joseph Goebbels was a household name would have triggered post-traumatic stress.
  • Our View: Truth The Best Tool In Our Defense Efforts (Yankton Press & Dakotan editorial). Does issuing distorted information to our own public make us any better than those who spew out misinformation for their own ends? Americans are better served by the truth. Whether we’re truly getting that now from our own defense department (let alone our news organizations) is certainly debatable, but that debate is just as important and vital to public morale as any news release or communiqué. Keep the laws as they are — strengthen them, in fact — and maintain an America with eyes wide open. The truth is the best antidote to distortion. It may not set as free, but it will certainly keep us free to think.
  • Consider this: American Dollars on American Propaganda to Brainwash American Citizens (Lisa Cerda, City Watch LA). y striking the existing ban on domestic misinformation campaigns, Americans can expect to be programmed on an even greater scale than ever before. Many would argue that the most prolific misinformation campaign comes in the way of our American History books in our schools. Others would say it is the gag order fueled by corporate interests on our mainstream media
  • .
  • NDAA Amendment Would Legalize War Propaganda (John Glaser, Antiwar Blog). In other words, people are getting information online that we don’t want people to have – therefore, legalize domestic propaganda. So NDAA is the latest effort by Congress (after SOPA, CISPA and the others) to take control of the best resource the American people have. The Internet is too open, too free, too…subversive. We need information the government wants us to have, not all that other stuff.
  • Proposed US law makes domestic propaganda legal (Cory Doctrow, BoingBoing). The amendment, sponsored by Rep. Mac Thornberry from Texas and Rep. Adam Smith from Washington State, would allow the US government to knowingly tell lies to its people in order to promote the government’s own policies.
  • Misleading Your Own (“The Reverend,” Akron Beakon Journal Online). So, I guess giving U.S. government and military officials the power to purposely deceive and mislead Americans into accepting policies which are unpopular….like more war….is just the natural flow of events for a rotted, bloated and declining Empire. The Soviets regularly lied to, deceived and misled their citizens about military adventurism, about worker productivity,…about the United States. The Soviets misled their people to help bolster acceptance of their policies, foreign and domestic. In the long run, that didn’t work. And it will not work for the U.S.A. either.
Hat tips to all links.



Commieblaster has a round-up of reactions against BHO's gun control executive orders. Here are just a few:

Updated: Thursday, January 17, 2013 at 5:59 AM
With Stroke of Pen: Obama Moves to Ban Sale and Manufacture of Semi-Automatic Weapons 01.16.13
Obama's Begging for Impeachment 01.16.13
Rand Paul: Obama Breaking the Law, Has King Complex 01.16.13
Oregon Sheriff Tells Obama: Illegal, We will Not Enforce 01.16.13
NRA AD: MSM Speaks for Elites, America Speaks for Itself 01.16.13
Citizens from 47 States Revolt Against Obama Orders 01.16.13
Flashback: Heston Talks to Al Gore About Gun Rights 01.16.13
Piers Morgan Loses Another Gun Debate 01.16.13

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Obama's Hypocrisy

Of course, the gun control issue that is being heavily exploited by the BHO BADminstration is but one of a long line of hypocritical and propagandist attempts to disarm Americans and turn our nation into a socialist nightmare.   BHO's attempts at gun grabbing and tyranny will not work!  But he will use anything (disgustingly - he will even use children like Hitler and Saddam Hussein often did) to present himself as something other than a tyrant.  However, at least 45% (if not more) of the public is on to his deceit and not falling for his staged propaganda.

I think the following ad highlights both BHO's elitism and hypocrisy!  It is spot on and needs to go viral!

~ Christine


Go to the NRA website to view it.

~ Christine *******

Hat Tip:

Also see: