tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post2862207374541386116..comments2024-03-24T23:41:23.944-07:00Comments on Talk Wisdom: It Wasn't Kool-Aid - It Was...Christinewjchttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-71172372520793230592009-01-26T14:37:00.000-08:002009-01-26T14:37:00.000-08:00Sorry Kaleokualoha,The fact is that "urban legend...Sorry Kaleokualoha,<BR/><BR/>The fact is that "urban legends" is a liberal leftist owned site. You are not going to get the true facts on this issue there.<BR/><BR/>I have a few questions for you.<BR/>Then I have two links for you to read.<BR/><BR/>Questions:<BR/><BR/>If Obama has nothing to hide, why is he not releasing the following documents?<BR/><BR/>What is he and his cohorts in crime keeping silent about?<BR/><BR/>All of this:<BR/><BR/>Mr. Barack Hussein Obama -<BR/><BR/>The American People want to know, who sent you?<BR/><BR/><BR/>Obama has lived for 48 years without leaving any footprints -- none! There is no Obama documentation -- no records -- no paper trail -- none -- this can't be an accident.<BR/><BR/>Original, vault copy birth certificate -- Not released<BR/><BR/>Certificate of Live Birth -- Released -- Counterfeit<BR/><BR/>Obama/Dunham marriage license -- Not released<BR/><BR/>Soetoro/Dunham marriage license -- Not released<BR/><BR/>Soetoro adoption records -- Not released<BR/><BR/>Fransiskus Assisi School School application -- Released<BR/><BR/>Punahou School records -- Not released<BR/><BR/>Selective Service Registration -- Released -- Counterfeit<BR/><BR/>Occidental College records -- Not released<BR/><BR/>Passport (Pakistan) -- Not released<BR/><BR/>Columbia College records -- Not released<BR/><BR/>Columbia thesis -- Not released<BR/><BR/>Harvard College records -- Not released<BR/><BR/>Harvard Law Review articles -- None (maybe 1, unsigned?)<BR/><BR/>Baptism certificate -- None<BR/><BR/>Medical records -- Not released<BR/><BR/>Illinois State Senate records -- None<BR/><BR/>Illinois State Senate schedule -- Lost<BR/><BR/>Law practice client list -- Not released<BR/><BR/>University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None<BR/><BR/>*******<BR/><BR/>Next, it has been discovered that Obama became a citizen at age 19. Since his father was a Kenyan (British owned in 1961) then Obama is also a native Kenyan by birth. Hawaii provides BC's for foreign born people. But this does not qualify him as a "natural born citizen" which is REQUIRED for POTUS.<BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/>Copy of post at <A HREF="http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=876" REL="nofollow">The Betrayal</A> blog:<BR/><BR/><B>OBAMA BECAME A U.S. CITIZEN AT AGE 19<BR/>Posted on January 26th, 2009 by David-Crockett <BR/>Patriots this is going to be the end the Usurpers stay in the Whitehouse. God Bless Ed and Caren Hale and the entire staff of Plains Radio Network. More cannot be said at this time other than it even being worse for Barry Soetoro.<BR/><BR/>vikaryan on Restore the Constitutional Republic reports<BR/><BR/>Obama did not become a U.S. citizen until age 19<BR/><BR/>1) Obama successfully achieved U.S. citizenship from his birthright nationality at birth at age 19 via the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, §349(a)[1988]. This law allows a child reaching majority to reverse naturalization forced upon him/her as a minor by parents or legal guardian.<BR/><BR/>While Philip Berg, Esq. claims Obama is not a citizen, he bases that claim on his own set of facts. Berg claims Obama was born in Kenya, which I highly suspect as well.<BR/><BR/>U.S. law does not allow U.S. nationality to be conferred on a foreign born baby of a foreign father unless the mother has a total of 14 years U.S. residency, five (5) of those years post age 14. I believe that is 8 U.S.C. 1401.<BR/><BR/>However, Berg has Obama, Sr. as the legal husband and Dunham the wife. Obama, Sr. had a first wife, and no codiciles of divorce. Therefore, the Obama-Dunham marriage was void ad initio per bigamy.<BR/><BR/>This changes applicable naturalization statute from 1401 to 1409(c), which is an out of wedlock provision requiring only one year (1) of U.S. residency post age 14 for the single mother to confer U.S. nationality.<BR/><BR/>Born in Kenya an illegitimate child to a bigamist father, Obama was a full British citizen at birth. Taking the child to Hawaii and divording Obama, Sr. (not necessary due to bigamy), Obama, Jr. would have become a U.S. citizen eventually, but the process would have been speeded up through a letter to the U.S. Secretary of State.<BR/><BR/>Obama’s Kenyan or Hawaiian birth are moot distinctions, once Stanley Ann Dunham took the child to Indonesia after marrying Lolo Soetoro. Indonesian law automatically claimed jurisdiction over the mother and child and they were naturalized Indonesians.<BR/><BR/>Obama remained a naturalized Indonesian (from dual British and U.S. nationalites) until he satisfied the 1952 Act’s five-year continuous residency requirement from age 14-18.<BR/><BR/>At age 19, Obama was a naturalized citizen.<BR/><BR/>PhixarBrown wants to make you think the entire process evaporates, leaving only the birthright U.S. nationality . . . thus, his twisted definition of natural born . . . or at birth. But, once conditions exist, at birth, requiring statute to sort out nationalities and subsequent naturalizations, the person is naturalized. His is ‘made natural by statute’ . . . or ‘naturalized.’<BR/><BR/>2) Obama may have held his Indonesian passport as late as age 31 when his mother finally returned to Hawaii to die. But, under case law such as Terrazas, Obama’s act of having another nation’s passport was a per se renunciation of U.S. citizenship, but his 5-years of U.S. residency shows intent NOT to renounce his U.S. citizenship, which he was qualifying for through that residency.<BR/><BR/>‘Intent’ is the key word, and the law is very liberalized in its interpretation. It requires a forceful and deliberate communication to the U.S. Secretary of State that you want to renounce, or in this case keep your foreign nationality.<BR/><BR/>The argument that Obama didn’t intend to become a U.S. citizen is a good one, but the fact that he satisfied 1952’s 349(a) would carry the case to its lawful conclusion.<BR/><BR/>3) Obama had a birthright to U.S. nationality. It was statute that made him a U.S. citizen at age 19. His Indonesian citizenship was foisted on him as a minor, which is why 349(a) was written.<BR/><BR/>http://forums.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=235<BR/><BR/>In his own words…<BR/><BR/>From: verite<BR/><BR/>Jan 25, 2009 18:57<BR/><BR/>Browsing at the bookstore today I couldn’t help myself, I picked up a copy of Dreams From My Father, Obama’s memoirs ghostwritten by his pal Ayers.<BR/><BR/>I did not buy the book, but for the sake of research I skimmed through Chapter 1, entitled “Origins.”<BR/><BR/>What a joke. Have you ever heard of an autobiography where the author neglects to mention his birthplace? It seemed to be written in third person….oh wait, I forgot, it was written in third person. Chapter 1 didn’t mention his birthplace, just memories of his early years in Hawai’i.<BR/><BR/>Here is something interesting on the last page of Chapter 1:<BR/><BR/>“I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school.”<BR/><BR/>Pretty sad when your own memoirs don’t state your birthplace. Ayers knew that his buddy wouldn’t have much of a political career if the actual birthplace was revealed.<BR/><BR/>I am conjecturing, so one of you liberals who has read the entire book, please tell us if it specifically states his birthplace.</B><BR/><BR/>*******<BR/><BR/>Please see this link, too:<BR/><BR/>The following link is a comprehensive site that discusses <A HREF="http://sites.google.com/site/obamabirth/" REL="nofollow">FAQ ON BARACK OBAMA’S HIDDEN <BR/>BIRTH CERTIFICATE</A> <BR/> <BR/>The site answers most of the objections of those who would still want to label all of the Obama court cases and the supporters of those court cases as <BR/>"conspiracy theorists."Christinewjchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-44756172179853147132009-01-26T14:02:00.000-08:002009-01-26T14:02:00.000-08:00"The FACT that he is ineligible for POTUS - (unles..."The FACT that he is ineligible for POTUS - (unless Malcolm X or Frank Marshall Davis is his real father) because Obama Sr. was a native of Kenya and therefore, Obama Jr. is NOT nor EVER COULD BE a "natural born citizen" as is required for POTUS according to Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of our United States Constitution - is NOT GOING AWAY."<BR/><BR/><BR/>RESPONSE: False, regardless of parentage, according to the 14th Amendment: <BR/><BR/>"Barack Obama is, in fact, a natural-born citizen of the United States, for the simple reason that he was born on American soil (in Hawaii, two years after it acquired Statehood). The age and citizenship status of Obama's parents at the time have no bearing on Obama's own citizenship. <BR/><BR/>Any confusion on this point is the result of misunderstanding the legal concepts of jus sanguinis (right of blood) and jus soli (right of birthplace). Here's how the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service explains the difference: <BR/><BR/>The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees citizenship at birth to almost all individuals born in the United States or in U.S. jurisdictions, according to the principle of jus soli. Certain individuals born in the United States, such as children of foreign heads of state or children of foreign diplomats, do not obtain U.S. citizenship under jus soli. <BR/><BR/>Certain individuals born outside of the United States are born citizens because of their parents, according to the principle of jus sanguinis (which holds that the country of citizenship of a child is the same as that of his / her parents). <BR/><BR/>It is a fact that under the provisions of Article Two of the U.S. Constitution naturalized citizens are ineligible to hold the office of president, but this disqualification does not apply to Barack Obama, who has been a citizen since birth." <BR/><BR/>- http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/barackobama/a/obama_citizen.htmAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-21916372454601013252009-01-26T06:19:00.000-08:002009-01-26T06:19:00.000-08:00Ted,It seems that you do not typically return to a...Ted,<BR/><BR/>It seems that you do not typically return to answer questions or comments after your postings, but I will ask some anyway.<BR/><BR/>Why are you so sure that Hillary would be the next president?<BR/><BR/>Isn't it <I>at least a possibility</I> that the American people would be so fed up with the Democrats that they would vote in a Republican candidate - like John McCain? This, of course, means if the electoral vote count goes to the next highest electoral vote getter.<BR/><BR/>If it is left up to Congress (which I would not agree with because of the democrat majority), then I can see your point. However, isn't it possible that the Clintons could be considered co-conspirators to allow an ineligible candidate like Soetoro/Obama be the Democratic nominee in the the first place? <B>They had to have known!</B><BR/><BR/>I see a lot of "heads rolling" over this - once SCOTUS does its job and takes one of the pending Obama ineligibility court cases.<BR/><BR/>How great it would be to sweep out all of these lunatic dems (like Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and the rest) out of Congress along with, and on the coattails of the usurper Obama! (I can dream...can't I?)<BR/><BR/>If SCOTUS doesn't do it's job, then I see We The People forming a Grand Jury in order to do what our current 3 branches of government refuse to do - get a usurper out of the presidency.Christinewjchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-60744024228954384012009-01-26T05:33:00.000-08:002009-01-26T05:33:00.000-08:00Rush Limbaugh was born in 1951 to an American mom ...Rush Limbaugh was born in 1951 to an American mom “Millie” and an American dad lawyer & WWII fighter pilot in Cape Girardeau, Missouri. Since ‘President’ Obama now wants to silence El Rushbo even before BHO has a chance to try to re-establish the “fairness doctrine” to silence all conservative talk radio, I’ve got three questions (but answers to only two of them): <BR/><BR/>FIRST QUESTION: Who IS the actual and lawful 44th President of the USA? <BR/><BR/>ANSWER: Joe Biden <BR/><BR/>Biden was initially the Acting President for at least 5 minutes under either the Constitution’s Article 2 or the Constitution’s 20th Amendment, from 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, having already taken his Oath of Office and before Obama completed his ‘oath’ at approximately 12:05 PM, 1/20/09. Under the 20th Amendment if the President-elect shall have failed to qualify, or alternatively under Article 2 if the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term, being 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, which ability and/or qualification includes that he take the Article 2 oath “before he enter on the execution of his office,” then either the Presidency shall devolve on the Vice President under Article 2 or the Vice President shall act as President under the 20th Amendment. (The importance of the oath in ‘commencing’ an ‘Obama Presidency’ — rather than merely the 1/20/09 Noon time — is confirmed by the re-take of the ‘oath’ by Obama at the White House on 1/21/09 after the first ‘oath’ was NOT administered by Justice Roberts NOR recited by Obama in the words as required under Article 2.) <BR/><BR/>This is significant because at such time that the Supreme Court finally rules on the merits on Obama’s disqualification as not being an Article 2 “natural born citizen” (clearly he is NOT, on either and/or both of two bases — (1) BHO refuses to show Birth Certificate to deny Kenyan birth/res ipsa loquitur “action speaks for itself” or (2) BHO admits dad was Kenyan/British, not American, citizen at Jr’s birth), Biden’s automatic status (without needing to take a separate Presidential Oath) of being President would be predicated upon four different bases: First, having been Vice President under Article 2; second, having been Vice President-elect under the 20th Amendment; third, having been actual President in the hiatus before Obama took the ‘oath(s)’; and fourth, retroactively deemed President during the full period of the Obama usurpation so that the acts of the Federal Government under the usurpation can be deemed authorized and/or ratified by Biden’s legitimacy. <BR/><BR/>SECOND QUESTION: Who will be the 45th President? <BR/><BR/>ANSWER: Hillary Clinton <BR/><BR/>One must assume that Bill and Hillary Clinton have been aware of all of the above. Biden’s wife recently “let the cat out of the bag” on the Oprah Show that both Biden and Hillary had considered alternatively Veep or Secretary of State, in either case, setting up Hillary to be President on a vote of the Democratic Congress if need be. <BR/><BR/>THIRD QUESTION: Is Obama an unwitting victim of this troika or a knowing participant?<BR/><BR/>ANSWER: Yet undetermined.Tedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04011502155494655727noreply@blogger.com