tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.comments2023-10-24T06:55:53.274-07:00Talk WisdomChristinewjchttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comBlogger11691125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-77928296690849067412013-10-28T10:14:08.703-07:002013-10-28T10:14:08.703-07:00Anonymous,
If you go to my current blog post on t...Anonymous,<br /><br />If you go to my current blog post on this issue you will get your questions answered.<br /><br /><a href="http://talkwisdom.blogspot.com/2013/10/sharing-triune-nature-of-god.html" rel="nofollow">Sharing the Triune Nature of God</a>Christinewjchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-32405198136275743452013-10-27T15:04:50.779-07:002013-10-27T15:04:50.779-07:00What is the Name of the Father?
What is the Name ...What is the Name of the Father?<br /><br />What is the Name of the Son ?<br /><br />What is the Name of the Holy Spirit ?<br /><br />Finally;<br /><br />What s the Name of God?<br /><br />ThanksAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-82463759687420314152013-10-27T14:00:14.529-07:002013-10-27T14:00:14.529-07:00Sorry about the double post! Here is the answer I...Sorry about the double post! Here is the answer I wrote on the previous post:<br /><br />GM,<br /><br />Perhaps what I wrote above answers your questions. Especially this verse:<br /><br /><br /> Jhn 15:26<br /><br />“But when the Helper comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He will testify of Me. <br /><br />Notice that Jesus needed to depart in order for the Holy Spirit to be sent.<br /><br /><br />Jhn 16:7<br /><br />“Nevertheless I tell you the truth. It is to your advantage that I go away; for if I do not go away, the Helper will not come to you; but if I depart, I will send Him to you. <br /><br />Jesus also tells us the purpose of sending the Holy Spirit to us:<br /><br />Jhn 14:26<br /><br />“But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you. <br /><br />And we also find out that the Holy Spirit will abide in us forever:<br /><br /><br />Jhn 14:16<br /><br />“And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may abide with you forever— <br /><br />This is why Jesus claims that he will be with us always, even unto the end of the age:<br /><br /><br />Mat 28:18 <br /><br />And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> Mat 28:19 <br /><br />“Go therefore[fn] and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, <br /><br /><br /><br /> Mat 28:20 <br /><br />“teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” Amen.[fn] Christinewjchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-12348430587935188192013-10-27T12:04:36.510-07:002013-10-27T12:04:36.510-07:00GM,
Perhaps what I wrote above answers your quest...GM,<br /><br />Perhaps what I wrote above answers your questions. Especially this verse:<br /><br /><br /> Jhn 15:26<br /><br />“But when the Helper comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He will testify of Me. <br /><br />Notice that Jesus needed to depart in order for the Holy Spirit to be sent.<br /><br /><br />Jhn 16:7<br /><br />“Nevertheless I tell you the truth. It is to your advantage that I go away; for if I do not go away, the Helper will not come to you; but if I depart, I will send Him to you. <br /><br />Jesus also tells us the purpose of sending the Holy Spirit to us:<br /><br />Jhn 14:26<br /><br />“But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you. <br /><br />And we also find out that the Holy Spirit will abide in us forever:<br /><br /><br />Jhn 14:16<br /><br />“And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may abide with you forever— <br /><br />This is why Jesus claims that he will be with us always, even unto the end of the age:<br /><br /><br />Mat 28:18 <br /> <br />And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. <br /><br /><br /><br /> <br /> Mat 28:19 <br /> <br />“Go therefore[fn] and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, <br /><br /> <br /> <br /> Mat 28:20 <br /> <br />“teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” Amen.[fn] <br />Christinewjchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-7411119696582473122013-10-27T11:56:26.477-07:002013-10-27T11:56:26.477-07:00Hello CAT and welcome to my blog.
God the Father ...Hello CAT and welcome to my blog.<br /><br />God the Father has many titles. For example: Jehovah (with several names attached like Jirah), Yahweh, Elohim (which is plural, btw, and reiterates the triune nature of God), and Adonai. Here is a link with more:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.agapebiblestudy.com/documents/the%20many%20names%20of%20god.htm" rel="nofollow">Agape Bible Study.com: The Many Names of God</a><br /><br />But He is known as God the Father or Father God by Christians who believe in Him, the Son of God - Jesus Christ, as well as the Holy Spirit. <br /><br />To answer your question - Holy Spirit is the name which was given by Jesus prior to his ascension back to the Father. The Holy Spirit worked severally; meaning: severally (ˈsɛvrəlɪ) <br /> <br />— adv <br />1. separately, individually, or distinctly <br />2. each in turn; respectively <br /><br />in Old Testament times. <br /><br />The Holy Spirit was poured out on the day of Pentecost (see Acts) upon the disciples as well as all of those who confess their sins and accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior.<br /><br />He is also called the Helper. See these Scriptures:<br /><br /><br />Jhn 14:16<br /> <br />“And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may abide with you forever— <br /><br /><br /><br /> <br /> Jhn 14:26<br /> <br />“But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you. <br /><br /><br /><br /> <br /> Jhn 15:26<br /> <br />“But when the Helper comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He will testify of Me. <br /><br /><br /><br /> <br /> Jhn 16:7<br /> <br />“Nevertheless I tell you the truth. It is to your advantage that I go away; for if I do not go away, the Helper will not come to you; but if I depart, I will send Him to you. <br /><br /><br />In those verses, Jesus described the work of the Holy Spirit.<br /><br />Hope this answers your question.Christinewjchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-11490331201626677482013-10-27T01:27:42.283-07:002013-10-27T01:27:42.283-07:00So much to discuss here...*sigh*
CJW: ”...we have...So <i><b>much</b></i> to discuss here...*sigh*<br /><br />CJW: <i>”...we have evidence of the Triune nature of God. The fact that Jesus used the terms "and of the Son; and of the Holy Spirit" separately from his reference to God the Father reiterates that they are three Persons in one Godhead.”</i> <br /><br />But when God the Son was crying out to God the Father from the cross, was he talking to himself, or not? <br />Following your line of reasoning(!), God sacrificed Himself to Himself to save mankind from Himself. Believers insist to me that this is wrong, but they never quite explain how. If this god is just one god, that's fine, but a three-gods-in one is <i>polytheism</i>, no matter how it's diguised. Polytheism is for the Hindus and other benighted peoples, not the proud descendants of Abraham. Apparently, the JWs feel the same way.<br /><br />The 'fact' that your god is a trinity is a fact only to Christians—and as you've demonstrated, not all of <i>them.</i><br /><br />Dr. Wood did a marvelous job of hazing things over, and I can see why DJKennedy must have liked it. But it's built on so many assumptions that I almost feel embarassed in taking it apart.<br /><br /><i>”Dr. Wood says that the universe is covered with fingerprints of the Trinity because it was made by the Triune God...there are fingerprints everywhere. We just don't see them.”</i><br /><br />Better men than I have been looking for those fingerprints, <a href="http://members.shaw.ca/tfrisen/evolution/Creationism/flood.html" rel="nofollow"> without success</a>. If there was a great flood that drowned all the world, neither the Egyptians nor the Chinese nor the Toltecs had any idea of it. The volume of water required to submerge a place like Mt. Everest would be far greater than exists in all the world right now, and it had to go <i><b>somewhere</b></i> afterward; but there's no evidence of it ever having been here. <br />What about the triune god who decided to unleash such horror—was it a unanimous decision among the godhead, or merely a 2-1 (and who voted 'against', if that were true?)? Noah and his family were the only survivors of that holocaust; they knew it was going to happen, which makes them accessories to the crime--co-conspirators, in fact. <br />But the drowned people and animals and vegetation have all long since rotted away, which means that there <i>are</i> no traces of god's handiwork. One might suppose that a god is capable of making any evidence of itself disappear, and that may be what has happened. Then again, this same god seems to be mighty anxious about making sure people know that it is not only A god, but THE God—the one (oops, sorry) the three and only. <i>(Ex 6:7, 16:12, 29:46, Lev 23:43, Deu 29:6, Isa 43:10, Jer 24:7, Eze 13:9, 20:20, 20:24, 23:49, 24:24, 28:22, 28:24, 28:26, 29:16, 34:30, 36:23, 39:22, 39:28, Joe 2:27, 3:17, Psa 46:10)</i><br /><br />Time and space both existed long before there were any people to distinguish them. Although I must wonder about a god that (I'm told) exists <i>outside of both</i>. How can a being do that and create them, or influence them in any way?GMpilothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07189308176043748343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-23388406591291172582013-10-26T22:26:12.278-07:002013-10-26T22:26:12.278-07:00Stop . . . in the NAME of the law!
So, if God'...Stop . . . in the NAME of the law!<br /><br />So, if God's NAME is Yahweh (Jerusalem Bible) or Jehovah (King James Bible), and his only begotten son's name is Jesus, what is the holy spirit's NAME? I've always wondered.CAThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08307220306506478399noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-22561832064788045702013-10-26T19:34:13.237-07:002013-10-26T19:34:13.237-07:00So much to discuss here...*sigh*
CJW: ”...we have...So <i><b>much</b></i> to discuss here...*sigh*<br /><br />CJW: <i>”...we have evidence of the Triune nature of God. The fact that Jesus used the terms "and of the Son; and of the Holy Spirit" separately from his reference to God the Father reiterates that they are three Persons in one Godhead.”</i> <br /><br />But when God the Son was crying out to God the Father from the cross, was he talking to himself, or not? <br />Following your line of reasoning(!), God sacrificed Himself to Himself to save mankind from Himself. Believers insist to me that this is wrong, but they never quite explain how. If this god is just one god, that's fine, but a three-gods-in one is <i>polytheism</i>, no matter how it's diguised. Polytheism is for the Hindus and other benighted peoples, not the proud descendants of Abraham. Apparently, the JWs feel the same way.<br /><br />The 'fact' that your god is a trinity is a fact only to Christians—and as you've demonstrated, not all of <i>them.</i><br /><br />Dr. Wood did a marvelous job of hazing things over, and I can see why DJKennedy must have liked it. But it's built on so many assumptions that I almost feel embarassed in taking it apart.<br /><br /><i>”Dr. Wood says that the universe is covered with fingerprints of the Trinity because it was made by the Triune God...there are fingerprints everywhere. We just don't see them.”</i><br /><br />Better men than I have been looking for those fingerprints, <a href="http://members.shaw.ca/tfrisen/evolution/Creationism/flood.html" rel="nofollow"> without success</a>. If there was a great flood that drowned all the world, neither the Egyptians nor the Chinese nor the Toltecs had any idea of it. The volume of water required to submerge a place like Mt. Everest would be far greater than exists in all the world right now, and it had to go <i><b>somewhere</b></i> afterward; but there's no evidence of it ever having been here. <br />What about the triune god who decided to unleash such horror—was it a unanimous decision among the godhead, or merely a 2-1 (and who voted 'against', if that were true?)? Noah and his family were the only survivors of that holocaust; they knew it was going to happen, which makes them accessories to the crime--co-conspirators, in fact. <br />But the drowned people and animals and vegetation have all long since rotted away, which means that there <i>are</i> no traces of god's handiwork. One might suppose that a god is capable of making any evidence of itself disappear, and that may be what has happened. Then again, this same god seems to be mighty anxious about making sure people know that it is not only A god, but THE God—the one (oops, sorry) the three and only. <i>(Ex 6:7, 16:12, 29:46, Lev 23:43, Deu 29:6, Isa 43:10, Jer 24:7, Eze 13:9, 20:20, 20:24, 23:49, 24:24, 28:22, 28:24, 28:26, 29:16, 34:30, 36:23, 39:22, 39:28, Joe 2:27, 3:17, Psa 46:10)</i><br /><br />Time and space both existed long before there were any people to distinguish them. Although I must wonder about a god that (I'm told) exists <i>outside of both</i>. How can a being do that and create them, or influence them in any way?GMpilothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07189308176043748343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-62006394143740423712013-10-21T20:50:41.979-07:002013-10-21T20:50:41.979-07:00Look at this!! Technorati must have seen my criti...Look at this!! Technorati must have seen my critical post about them and they dropped my blog over 400 points!<br /><br />moved down -927 places <br />1120. Talk Wisdom<br />http://talkwisdom.blogspot.com<br />Recent: Turning Point - Disapproval: The … <br /> <br /> World <br />Auth: 111 <br />Moved negative places Change -436<br /><br /><br />Ha ha ha haaaa!! I wear it as a badge of proof of their hateful ideology!!<br /> Christinewjchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-44523194413476042422013-10-21T20:32:59.724-07:002013-10-21T20:32:59.724-07:00Reuters quoted the woman - that's the differen...Reuters <i>quoted</i> the woman - that's the difference.<br /><br />Did you watch and listen to the video? <br /><br />The dialogue that was broadcast by Fox News was dubbed in. How do we know? Two ways. 1. Because the stenographer said those words at the elevator. 2. She was walking away from the microphone, yet the same volume of her voice could be heard (via the dubbed in Fox video) as she was dragged off from the House floor.<br /><br />It was interesting to see what was left out - namely - her exclamation about the Lord Jesus Christ.<br /><br />Did you find it strange that she just suddenly, in a zombie-like trance, got up and went up to the podium after that gray haired man spoke with her and nodded? Then, he got on his phone and appears to be texting - not even paying attention to the woman as she yelled at the podium.<br /><br />Strange...very strange. <br /><br /><br /><br />Christinewjchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-52290779936972916302013-10-21T18:46:56.327-07:002013-10-21T18:46:56.327-07:00Reuters is part of "the media" you so de...Reuters is part of "the media" you so despise.<br /><br />What makes <i>their</i> account of the stenographer different?GMpilothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07189308176043748343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-28481388381624332032013-10-18T22:36:23.836-07:002013-10-18T22:36:23.836-07:00GM (mistakenly) wrote:
"If you wanted to dem...GM (mistakenly) wrote:<br /><br />"If you wanted to demonstrate that liberals don't like shows such as Homeland, why did you complain about it being 'too violent and bloody'?"<br /><br />This proves that you didn't read the link. The post was obviously critical of the TV show, and thus the post was criticized BY A LIBERAL at Technorati because the blog suffered a huge deduction in authority points.Christinewjchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-33810990194101522912013-10-18T21:04:55.327-07:002013-10-18T21:04:55.327-07:00Only a low-information voter would write what you ...Only a low-information voter would write what you just wrote GM.<br /><br />Let me challenge you to do some research (which means you must look in places other than MSNBC) in order to answer your own questions.Christinewjchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-69510669164939688172013-10-18T11:54:23.665-07:002013-10-18T11:54:23.665-07:00I have every expectation that it will succeed, and...I have every expectation that it will succeed, and I'm sure Republicans do, too. Why else would they have fought so hard to prevent its passage? Why else would half the states (all those with Republican governors) delay its implementation?<br />Not wanting your citizens to be insured is insane; fortunately, insanity is also covered by the ACA.<br /><br />In the end it may go down alongside Prohibition, but that's up to those who follow us. Better to try and fail than not to try at all, especially where people's health is concerned.GMpilothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07189308176043748343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-18625376050803512422013-10-17T19:57:42.867-07:002013-10-17T19:57:42.867-07:00Wouldn't it be ironic if it all comes crashing...Wouldn't it be ironic if it all comes crashing down under it's own weight of incompetence? It would be quite the demise to celebrate. We shall have to wait and see...Christinewjchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-24571799267664790842013-10-17T15:30:48.265-07:002013-10-17T15:30:48.265-07:00"But...but I thought that with Gawd all thing..."But...but I thought that with Gawd all things were possible! Obamacare <i>had</i> to be destroyed to save us from socialism!"<br /><br />You're not taking this well, are you? <br />GMpilothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07189308176043748343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-77508970782987949342013-10-15T23:45:05.472-07:002013-10-15T23:45:05.472-07:00Yadda yadda yadda....you've said all that befo...Yadda yadda yadda....you've said all that before. You've decried his (supposedly) foreign origins, his (possible) devotion to Islam, his (unconfirmed) “crimes”, his (undocumented) sexuality, his (ostensibly) subversive actions since assuming office, his (alleged) secret decoder ring...and <b>none of it has any substance</b>. <br />NO conspiracy can be so all-encompassing that the truth doesn't leak out somewhere, something concrete and undeniable—but none of your blog buddies have revealed anything yet. After five years there should be something, don't you think? Or don't you think?<br /><br />If you wanted to demonstrate that liberals don't like shows such as <i>Homeland</i>, why did you complain about it being 'too violent and bloody'? Not bloody enough, maybe, since you probably watched the whole thing.<br /><br /><i>”Why don't you tell R.A. Torrey of his error? What am I? Your secretary?”</i><br /><br />You thought he was good enough to quote, so I thought you, as a fellow Christian, would take him aside and show him his error. Didn't you say you worked in education?<br /><br /><i>”It's weird. There are leftist leaning vets (like yourself) who refuse to see the merits of those whose ideology disagrees with yours. They see Barry O. for what he is--”</i><br /><br />What, you mean President of the United States?<br />If I wanted to hang with people whose 'ideology' agrees with mine, I would not be at talkwisdom.blogspot.com. But I don't mind clashing swords with my opposites. Too bad for you.GMpilothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07189308176043748343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-14031550806714526962013-10-15T19:29:48.177-07:002013-10-15T19:29:48.177-07:00Actually, it took them 8 days to update my blog po...Actually, it took them 8 days to update my blog posts over there. <br /><br />No need to worry about my "underwear" - you dirty old man. As usual, you have completely missed the purpose of the current post.<br /><br />And, the comment about <i>Homeland</i> was to show how thin-skinned the liberals are when being criticized.<br /><br />I beg to differ with you on whom the vets blame for the shutdown. <br />Those who showed up at the WWII Memorial event certainly knew who to blame for the Barry-cades! And they physically presented the buffoon responsible for them with a "present" outside his Spite House.<br /><br />Why don't you tell R.A. Torrey of his error? What am I? Your secretary?<br /><br />It's weird. There are leftist leaning vets (like yourself) who refuse to see the merits of those whose ideology disagrees with yours. They see Barry O. for what he is - and you refuse to see it. That's too bad. You just continue to demonstrate how blinded you are to the truth. And that veil over your eyes continues to shield you from admitting how wrong you are regarding Obammy and his ilk.<br /><br />Such a shame! You have fallen hook, line, and sinker for the sham!Christinewjchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-28743696003233390022013-10-15T18:45:15.830-07:002013-10-15T18:45:15.830-07:00CJW: ”...I mentioned that this blog reached the &q...CJW: <i>”...I mentioned that this blog reached the "top 100 world politics blog list" over at Technorati. Well, it didn't last long because my latest post must have annoyed the liberals over there. ”</i><br /><br />Oooh, poor baby! Most stats and lists on the web change every hour—often sooner. As a webmistress you should know that. It's been a whole eight days since you published that list! You still made the list, something many blogs never manage—and now you're getting a twist in your underwear because your position on that list shifted? Technorati isn't the Sacred Scrolls, meant to be permanent and everlasting, you know. <br /><br /><i>”Of course, the liberal leftist techies over there are going to reject an historic march of veterans storming Washington D.C., tearing down the Barry-cades... ”</i><br /><br />When one or another vet injures himself tearing down a barrier, that same vet will likely go to...um...a VA hospital, perhaps? Which now operates with smaller staffs due to the shutdown? Will those same vets, myself among them, get their pensions two weeks from now? I know a few such men, and they seem to know exactly who's to blame (HINT: it isn't Obama).<br />Also, aren't there any right-leaning techies? I mean, <i><b>you</b></i> managed it!<br /><br />I don't watch much TV, Pollyanna. Certainly <i>Homeland</i> is not on my list. I assume that you went in knowing what kind of show it was. You didn't like <i>Desperate Housewives</i> either, but for a while you woudn't stop whining about it. If you like Hallmark so much, stay with it!<br /><br />BTW, you might inform R.A. Torrey of his error. A <b>mote</b> (as in <a href="http://www.blueletterbible.org/search/search.cfm?Criteria=mote+in+eye&t=KJV#s=s_primary_0_1" rel="nofollow">a brother's eye</a> can be run across in a nanosecond. The other kind surrounds castles, and has a different spelling. Nothing wrong with his sincerity, though.GMpilothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07189308176043748343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-49170788601032326472013-10-15T14:52:31.856-07:002013-10-15T14:52:31.856-07:00You are welcome - really hope you enjoyed your bir...You are welcome - really hope you enjoyed your birthday!<br /><br />I really liked what you wrote at the Christian Gazette link - and thanks for mentioning my blog there!Christinewjchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-60493605977587275272013-10-15T11:27:28.361-07:002013-10-15T11:27:28.361-07:00Hey Christine! Just a note to thank you for the bi...Hey Christine! Just a note to thank you for the birthday wish and to let you know I mentioned you and Talk Wisdom here ...<br /><br />http://thechristiangazette.wordpress.com/2013/10/14/christian-faith/stevehttp://cryandhowl.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-33569903954176131832013-10-11T19:18:32.581-07:002013-10-11T19:18:32.581-07:00Christ once turned over the money changers tables ...Christ once turned over the money changers tables at the Temple. He also called the Pharisees, "a broad of vipers."<br /><br />I think that Christ calls them as he sees them.<br /><br />He knows all about Barack Hussein Obama - and one day Obama will either meet Jesus at the Judgment Seat of Christ (highly unlikely - at this point) or, at the Great White Throne Judgment for unbelievers. <br /><br />Obama may escape justice here on this earth, but he won't in eternity!<br /><br />Neither will you.Christinewjchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-6183593618502478572013-10-11T15:53:11.528-07:002013-10-11T15:53:11.528-07:00CJW: ”This post was not really about "you.&qu...CJW: <i>”This post was not really about "you." I simply utilized a portion of your comment in order to inform readers how you purposely left out the second sentence in my blog's goals.”</i><br /><br />Yeah, because NObody EVER reads a blog masthead, right? It's right at the top where people can see it, but no one ever looks there and reads it for themselves. As for sins of omission, whatever happened to your post about Obama's breakdown? Or wasn't that real?<br /><br />All right, I won't stray far from the topic of your post. So...<i><b>How is disparaging the President “making an impact for Christ”?</b></i> Is that the sort of thing he would have done? <br />You know him better than I do, but reports of his vicious tongue have never reached me. Maybe I'm reading the wrong documents.<br /><br />Wayne Allen Root has a head full of theories, as do many others. I have one of my own: that the world was created last Thursday, and everything that's in it appeared just as it is now, complete with history that never happened, events that never occurred, and populated by people you've never met*. But I have no <i>evidence</i> to prove any of this, and neither does Root with his theories.<br />If he actually had evidence, he would reveal it...wouldn't he? Or did Obama buy/scare him off, too?<br /><br />Since your skin is so thin, you should learn to stop throwing things at people. They just might throw something back.<br /><br />*<i>That just might be plausible. After all, not long ago your blog buddy steve claimed he'd never been to Russia...so maybe there really is no such place!</i>GMpilothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07189308176043748343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-67171974708563847982013-10-11T08:03:55.239-07:002013-10-11T08:03:55.239-07:00GM,
This post was not really about "you.&quo...GM,<br /><br />This post was not really about "you." I simply utilized a portion of your comment in order to inform readers how you purposely left out the second sentence in my blog's goals.<br /><br />Let's call your action a sin of omission.<br /><br />The bulk of the post had to do with how being salt and light for Christ in this world brings the gospel to the forefront in the minds of people. Some do so much more adeptly than I. Thus, I shared the encounter with 82-year-old Phillip who has answered his particular call from the LORD.<br /><br />About disparaging Obama.<br /><br />The names that I have given him are descriptive in nature - pointing out to readers what the man represents despite the media of mass deception's attempt to shield him from any criticism.<br /><br />Let's see what I have called him.<br /><br />1. ObamaFRAUD - because he has hidden his records in order to hide something about his past that he did not want voters to know about. <a href="http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/obama-is-100-red-white-blue-american-born/" rel="nofollow">Wayne Allen Root</a> has a theory about the fraud that he is hiding.<br /><br />2. ObaMARXIST - Read the entire <a href="http://www.commieblaster.com/obama/index.html" rel="nofollow">page at Commieblaster.com</a> for proof of this allegation!<br /><br />3. ObaMAO - See #2.<br /><br />4. ObamaLIAR - See <a href="http://www.pinterest.com/cofwhite45/lies-president-obama-told-me/" rel="nofollow">Pinterest: Lies Obama Told Me</a>.<br /><br />5. Well...the first four will keep people reading for hours so I can stop there. Besides, I don't want to get far off the topic of this post.Christinewjchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18434229284833642438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12391603.post-3601556318347519992013-10-10T17:14:02.499-07:002013-10-10T17:14:02.499-07:00It's a good thing you wrote “seems to object”,...It's a good thing you wrote “<b>seems</b> to object”, because I don't. You've got to be quite good to get Technorati's attention, and I remember how enthusiastic you were about blogging when you started this. <br />You stated “Part of defending the tenets and values of Biblical Christian faith involves engaging within the culture.” That makes you one of those “in the world, but not of the world” types, right? <br />I <i>still</i> find it funny, but I don't object.<br /><br />I'd like to add something that was left off the salt list:<br /><br />* Salt is a source of sterilization. In ancient times, when an army captured an enemy city, the conquerors would demolish and burn it, and then spread salt on the ground so that nothing would ever grow there again. Just as Christians have done to civilizations before, or contrary to, their own.<br /><br />I'm amazed. It must be a really slow news day, for you to invoke me in your column! But no need to thank me; just doing my job. After all, I'm not just your nemesis, but your <i><b>favorite</b></i> nemesis! Any notoriety I may have is due to you. <br />When you talk about Obama and others in such disparaging terms, as you have every week over the past five years, I have to wonder: in what way is this 'making an impact for Christ'? In my experience, <br />no one will listen to you if you insult them all the time.<br /><br />BTW, it's now nine years (as of yesterday) since we first “met”. I should think of an appropriate gift for next year. GMpilothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07189308176043748343noreply@blogger.com