Where's Obama's Birth Certificate?

The other day, I was driving along in my car thinking about all the hoopla that surrounded John McCain's place of birth in the Panama Canal Zone and the fact that the media went crazy - demanding to physically see his birth certificate.

What about Obama's birth certificate? Go and read all the buzz about Barack's birth certificate over at Michele Malkin's blog. Several links to check out as well.

Thought this comment over there was relevant:

On June 10th, 2008 at 8:37 am, legendx3 said:
Barack Obama is not legally a U.S. Natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between “December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986? . Presidential office requires a natural-born citizen if the child was not born to two U.S. Citizen parents, which of course is what exempts John McCain though he was born in the Panama Canal. US Law very clearly stipulates: “…If only one parent was a U.S. Citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16.” Barack Obama’s father was not a U.S. Citizen and Obama’s mother was only 18 when Obama was born, which means though she had been a U.S. Citizen for 10 years, (or citizen perhaps because of Hawai’i being a territory) the mother fails the test for being so for at least 5 years **prior to** Barack Obama’s birth, but *after* age 16. It doesn’t matter *after* . In essence, she was not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S. Citizenship. At most, there were only 2 years elapsed since his mother turned 16 at the time of Barack Obama’s birth when she was 18 in Hawai’i. His mother would have needed to have been 16+5= 21 years old, at the time of Barack Obama’s birth for him to have been a natural-born citizen. As aformentioned, she was a young college student at the time and was not. Barack Obama was already 3 years old at that time his mother would have needed to have waited to have him as the only U.S. Citizen parent. Obama instead should have been naturalized, but even then, that would still disqualify him from holding the office.

*** Naturalized citizens are ineligible to hold the office of President.

*** Though Barack Obama was sent back to Hawaii at age 10, all the other info does not matter because his mother is the one who needed to have been a U.S. Citzen for 10years prior to his birth on August 4, 1961, with 5 of those years being after age 16. Further, Obama may have had to have remained in the country for some time to protect any citizenship he would have had, rather than living in Indonesia. Now you can see why Obama’s aides stopped his speech about how we technically have more than 50 states, because it would have led to this discovery. This is very clear cut and a blaring violation of U.S. Election law. I think the Gov. Of California would be very interested in knowing this if Obama were elected President without being a natural-born U.S. Citizen, and it would set precedence. Stay tuned to your TV sets because I suspect some of this information will be leaking through over the next several days…

I think that the media will have a hard time covering up this one!

Wouldn't that be a hoot if Obama ends up disqualified from running for the presidency either at or before the Dem's convention?

Look out! Here comes that dynamic duo - the Clintons - back into the spotlight again! Hannity will have to re-start the "Stop Hillary Express!"

In my book, one is as bad as the other! Either one of them - Obama or Hillary - would ruin our country if [God forbid!] they were elected...


HT: Michele Malkin




*******


Update! Oh Wait! Never mind! Found it!

HT: ajmontana said:
Faux News Alert

heh heh...couldn't resist!

*******
Second Update:

Visit Truth in the Word and read about "Passportgate" in the comment section!

*******
Related Article:

Is Obama's Candidacy constitutional?

*******
Another Update:

Quote from USNavyBlue at Digg:

It seems the deeper we go into the investigation, the more troubling Obama's candidacy for president becomes!

There is another aspect of Obama’s citizenship in question that NO ONE is reporting on. I wonder why?

On November 23, 1993, President Clinton signed United States Public Law 103-150, which not only acknowledged the illegal actions committed by the United States in the overthrow of the legitimate government of Hawaii, but also that the Hawaiian people never surrendered their sovereignty.

The latter is the most important part of United States Public Law 103-150 for it makes it quite clear that the Hawaiian people never legally ceased to be a sovereign separate independent nation. There is no argument that can change that fact.

United States Public Law 103-150, despite its polite language, is an official admission that the government of the United States illegally occupies the territory of the Hawaiian people.
In 1999, the United Nations confirmed that the plebiscite vote that led to Hawaii's statehood was in violation of article 73 of the United Nations' charter. The Hawaii statehood vote, under treaty then in effect, was illegal and non-binding.

Hawaii Declares Independence From All Foreign Powers Samuel Keolamauloa Kaluna, Jr. Regent, Prime Minister P.O. Box 359 96-3148 Pikake Street Pahala-Kau, Kingdom of Hawaii 96777

In 1999, the United Nations confirmed that the plebiscite vote that led to Hawaii's statehood was in violation of article 73 of the United Nations' charter. The Hawaii statehood vote, under treaty then in effect, was illegal and non-binding.

In a world where nations are as governed by laws as are men, Hawaii is not and has never legally been a part of the United States. Hawaii was stolen from the Hawaiian people, and they want it back.

Hawaiians submitted a petition to Congress with 29,000 signatures opposing annexation, and petitions to the Republic of Hawaii (the satellite government imposed upon the native Hawaiians), asking that annexation be put to a public vote. They were never permitted to vote on the issue.
In all, three separate Treaties of Annexation were sent to congress. All three failed. In the end, Hawaii was annexed by a joint resolution of Congress. But Congress did not have the legal authority to do so. A joint resolution of the U.S. Congress has no legal standing in a foreign country, which is what Hawaii remained, even under the provisional government.

If one holds that the government of the United States is obliged to obey the laws and the UN charter it freely signed, then the status of the Hawaiian people as a distinct and sovereign nation is beyond debate. This makes the United States in Hawaii, as Gandhi described the British in India, acting as the masters in someone else's home.

ARTICLE II, Section I. of the Constitution of the United States requires:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Barack Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii and thus was not a “natural born Citizen” of the United States to satisfy the constitutional requirement for the U.S. Presidency. His mother was from Wichita, Kansas, but his father was born in Nyangoma-Ko-Kogelo, Siaya District, Kenya. Legally then, Barack Obama is a foreigner, per United States Public Law 103-150. It is revealing that the American Communist party (CPUSA) actively supports Obama. In admitting his birth in Honolulu Barack Obama has, perhaps innocently, claimed to be a natural born Citizen, a false presentation nevertheless. An innocent violation of the U.S. Constitution in such an important matter as that of vying to be President is still a most serious transgression.

President Bush has sworn to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States in his oath of office.

Will President Bush issue an executive order disqualifying Barack Obama as a Constitutional Candidate for President of the United States? Or who will sue the Federal election Board and the DNC over this abuse of the constitution? Will the RNC sue? Will the McCain campaign sue? Will President George Bush sue to have a decision from the Supreme Court? Will some group of concerned citizens sue? Or shall the fraud continue without action to correct it until the election?

HT: US Navy Blue comment at Digg