VIDEO LINK
The AP reports,The Pentagon’s senior judge overseeing terror trials at Guantanamo Bay dropped charges Thursday against an al-Qaida suspect in the 2000 USS Cole bombing, upholding President Barack Obama’s order to freeze military tribunals there.
The charges against suspected al-Qaida bomber Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri marked the last active Guantanamo war crimes case.
Diane McDaniels lost her son James when terrorists bombed the USS Cole On October 12, 2000. 17 American sailors died in that terrorist attack. McDaniels told Fox News Neil Cavuto that she refused an invitation to the White House to meet with President Obama today.
What Obama did to the families of these victims was AWFUL! ABSOLUTELY AWFUL!! There are no other words and absolutely NO EXCUSES for this!!
I pray every day that Obama gets BOOTED OUT OF OFFICE!
THANK GOD for Dr. Orly's blog - DEFEND OUR FREEDOMS.US, all her efforts on the Alan Keyes case against Obama's ineligibility for POTUS, and keeping us up to date on the 40 plus other lawsuits and issues surrounding the USURPER AND FRAUD - OBAMA!
Hat Tip: Picket Lines
*******
Update 2/8/09 at 9:37 p.m.
Many bloggers have already shared the following article and link at their blogs. However, if you haven't read it yet - you ought to. And, read through all of the comments. My thanks go to blogger Orionjri for telling me about the article.
America: What Have You Done? by Melanie Phillips
The entire article is excellent. Ms. Phillips nails it! Too bad our Lamestream Media doesn't report the truth like this woman just did!!
Her conclusion is absolutely flawless about the lawless thug Obama & his corrupt cronies:
And how did the 44th President react to the growing public dismay over the mess he was making? He threw his toys out of the pram -- or perhaps that should read, he got into the pram. For he fled the scene of the disaster and sought the company of seven year-olds instead. As the Telegraph reported:‘We were just tired of being in the White House,’ he told a group of excited seven-year-olds before discussing Batman and reading them a book.
Tired of being President – after two weeks!
Tax cheats, pork-barrel politics, ancillary child abuse, incompetence, chaos, treachery and infantilism. America – what have you done?!
This comment has been selected from the 133 (most of them quite good) posted after the article because of the irony and hypocrisy that is revealed regarding Obama's "LIAR LIAR CRISIS FIRE" BLOVIATING ABOUT THE STIMUWASTE BILL :
His first trip WASN'T to visit school kids, but to attend a Democratic political strategy retreat at a resort in Williamsburg that cost the US taxpayers millions of dollars. It's only 100 miles away, but he took AirForce One from DC to Richmond (short hop) at a million+ dollar expense -- he could have taken a helicopter there in an hour at a fraction of that cost!!! Nooo...has to fly Air Force One. And the whole time he's a luxury resort with leading Democrats they are screaming at us about there being a crisis!!!
John Cunningham
February 8th, 2009 3:56pm
YEP....
*******
2/9/09
I wonder whether or not the grieving mother in the above video, Diane McDaniels, is (was) aware of the bloggers who properly vetted Barack Hussein Obama (and specifically warned voters about his Chicago corruption, friend to terrorist Ayers, anti-military mindset, neo-Marxist worldview, death-to-unborn-babies holocaust support, Alinsky brain dirtying corruption, hate-spewing preacher, Muslim upbringing and radical alliances, pay to play illegal politics etc.) over the course of the primaries and general election campaigns.
The following article, written by Rev. Bresciani reveals the truth about what type of media did the better job of vetting Obama. It was DEFINITELY THE BLOGS!
Christine
*******
Quote:
Published: Feb 7, 2009
Daily Kos, Factcheck And Snopes Or How To Vet A Presidential Candidate
by Rev Bresciani
Even though the main stream media ignores the Obama birth certificate controversy it still rages on the internet in articles and blogs. Is it extraneous nonsense, conspiracy claptrap and internet hype. Not by a long shot. Here's why.
Because of the Supreme Courts refusal to hear the cases put before them after conferencing them the speculation about Obama's missing documents including his signed birth certificate from the state of Hawaii, the mystery grows, the intrigue is compelling and the arguments have become the most volatile on the web.
In the absence of judicial intervention all the questioners and petitioners have only one avenue of recourse and that is to keep plugging away. With new cases arising and old cases still pending the latest thrust is to approach legislators with the question.
Often overlooked is the simple wisdom used in the logic of both the main stream media and the naysayers in general. In fact the very premise the naysayers are basing their argument on should be turned on them to be most effective. What is that argument?
If the main stream media completely ignores the whole matter it looks like it is no more than the ranting of a few conspiracy theorists and discontented blogospherians. It is a way of saying that the internet hasn't a clue and bloggers are just blabbermouths to start with so how could they possibly approach the dignity and acceptability of the of the msm? This idea should be set against the pompous for the greatest effect. That argument goes like this.
It was not the Supreme Court that vetted Obama, not the state courts, not the election commissions, not the attorneys general, not the legislature, not the DNC and not the Hawaii Office of Vital Statistics. Just who did vet Barack Obama? You guessed it, the internet!
The document Obama and the DNC offered which is now alleged to be fraudulent was posted only to the internet. The Daily Kos may be the high holy blog spot for space mountain type ego-centric wordsmithing, foul language and liberal blather but it is not the Supreme Court. Snopes and Factcheck are pretty close neighbors to the Kos. Regardless of who owns these sites they are merely more of the same; the internet!
When the msm, the DNC or anyone else tries to portray the Obama documentation activists as a group of conspiracy enthusiasts limited to the undisciplined ravings of the internet it is truly the pot calling the kettle black.
Nothing significant about Obama's past has ever gone beyond the internet. Should he or his ka-zillion swaggering adorers be surprised that some Americans are now asking for much more than that? Haven't they noticed that those who are now raising the question of Obama's eligibility are only reporting on the internet they are not asking the internet to settle the issue. That's more than we've gotten so far!
I am not a legal expert or well versed constitutionalist but I'm certain that the vetting of presidential candidates was never assigned by any law of this land to the internet. It was Barack Obama who showed his documents to the world on a medium that shows countless hours of videos where people try to jump off buildings on to a watermelon or swallow rubber ducky's to entertain the blithering. Should we take them seriously, should we take him seriously?
I will not callously insult the fine internet sites that exist by lumping them all in the same category. What I must do is remind those seeking the truth that if it is the only medium you now have to get to the truth until someone in our legal system catches the drift, so keep holding the line and know that millions of us are counting on you.
Just when all hope seems gone the tide has begun to change. Obama's naiveté in foreign affairs is looking more Carter-ish and his ability to swing votes in the bailout battle makes him look weak at home or at the least too inexperienced as many have sagely warned.
Then along comes Guantanamo judge Col. James L. Pohl who recently rejected the president's request to halt the proceedings of the military tribunal being conducted to prosecute terrorism suspects. Kudos to the Colonel! Maybe he will embolden the squeamish Supremes and other judges to re-think their refusals to let the matter be answered once and for all.
Until Obama offers more than an internet vetting of his documents those who are now forced to air their grievances and questions only on the web should not be the least bit dismayed. They are doing no better or worse than Barack Obama even without the msm and an entourage of entranced worshippers. /quote
Rev Bresciani is a columnist for online and print publications and now has millions of readers throughout the world
Hat tips:
The Post Chronicle
Zach's blog where I first read the article.
This item may be of interest to you:
ReplyDeleteAmerica -- what have you done?
http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/3332636/america-what-have-you-done.thtml
Thank you so much Orionjri. Just read the article and it was excellent! Added a link to it to my original post.
ReplyDeleteHere is what was added to the front page:
Update 2/8/09 at 9:37 p.m.
Many bloggers have already shared the following article and link at their blogs. However, if you haven't read it yet - you ought to. And, read through all of the comments. My thanks go to blogger Orionjri for telling me about the article.
America: What Have You Done? by Melanie Phillips
The entire article is excellent. Ms. Phillips nails it! Too bad our Lamestream Media doesn't report the truth like this woman just did!!
Her conclusion is absolutely flawless about the lawless thug Obama & his corrupt cronies:
And how did the 44th President react to the growing public dismay over the mess he was making? He threw his toys out of the pram -- or perhaps that should read, he got into the pram. For he fled the scene of the disaster and sought the company of seven year-olds instead. As the Telegraph reported:
‘We were just tired of being in the White House,’ he told a group of excited seven-year-olds before discussing Batman and reading them a book.
Tired of being President – after two weeks!
Tax cheats, pork-barrel politics, ancillary child abuse, incompetence, chaos, treachery and infantilism. America – what have you done?!
This comment has been selected from the 133 (most of them quite good) posted after the article because of the irony and hypocrisy that is revealed regarding Obama's "LIAR LIAR CRISIS FIRE" BLOVIATING ABOUT THE STIMUWASTE BILL :
His first trip WASN'T to visit school kids, but to attend a Democratic political strategy retreat at a resort in Williamsburg that cost the US taxpayers millions of dollars. It's only 100 miles away, but he took AirForce One from DC to Richmond (short hop) at a million+ dollar expense -- he could have taken a helicopter there in an hour at a fraction of that cost!!! Nooo...has to fly Air Force One. And the whole time he's a luxury resort with leading Democrats they are screaming at us about there being a crisis!!!
John Cunningham
February 8th, 2009 3:56pm
YEP....
2/9/09
ReplyDeleteI wonder whether or not the grieving mother in the video, Diane McDaniels, is (was) aware of the bloggers who properly vetted Barack Hussein Obama (and specifically warned voters about his Chicago corruption, friend to terrorist Ayers, anti-military mindset, neo-Marxist worldview, death-to-unborn-babies holocaust support, Alinsky brain dirtying corruption, hate-spewing preacher, Muslim upbringing and radical alliances, pay to play illegal politics etc.) over the course of the primaries and general election campaigns.
The following article, written by Rev. Bresciani reveals the truth about what type of media did the better job of vetting Obama. It was DEFINITELY THE BLOGS!
Christine
*******
Quote:
Published: Feb 7, 2009
Daily Kos, Factcheck And Snopes Or How To Vet A Presidential Candidate
by Rev Bresciani
Even though the main stream media ignores the Obama birth certificate controversy it still rages on the internet in articles and blogs. Is it extraneous nonsense, conspiracy claptrap and internet hype. Not by a long shot. Here's why.
Because of the Supreme Courts refusal to hear the cases put before them after conferencing them the speculation about Obama's missing documents including his signed birth certificate from the state of Hawaii, the mystery grows, the intrigue is compelling and the arguments have become the most volatile on the web.
In the absence of judicial intervention all the questioners and petitioners have only one avenue of recourse and that is to keep plugging away. With new cases arising and old cases still pending the latest thrust is to approach legislators with the question.
Often overlooked is the simple wisdom used in the logic of both the main stream media and the naysayers in general. In fact the very premise the naysayers are basing their argument on should be turned on them to be most effective. What is that argument?
If the main stream media completely ignores the whole matter it looks like it is no more than the ranting of a few conspiracy theorists and discontented blogospherians. It is a way of saying that the internet hasn't a clue and bloggers are just blabbermouths to start with so how could they possibly approach the dignity and acceptability of the of the msm? This idea should be set against the pompous for the greatest effect. That argument goes like this.
It was not the Supreme Court that vetted Obama, not the state courts, not the election commissions, not the attorneys general, not the legislature, not the DNC and not the Hawaii Office of Vital Statistics. Just who did vet Barack Obama? You guessed it, the internet!
The document Obama and the DNC offered which is now alleged to be fraudulent was posted only to the internet. The Daily Kos may be the high holy blog spot for space mountain type ego-centric wordsmithing, foul language and liberal blather but it is not the Supreme Court. Snopes and Factcheck are pretty close neighbors to the Kos. Regardless of who owns these sites they are merely more of the same; the internet!
When the msm, the DNC or anyone else tries to portray the Obama documentation activists as a group of conspiracy enthusiasts limited to the undisciplined ravings of the internet it is truly the pot calling the kettle black.
Nothing significant about Obama's past has ever gone beyond the internet. Should he or his ka-zillion swaggering adorers be surprised that some Americans are now asking for much more than that? Haven't they noticed that those who are now raising the question of Obama's eligibility are only reporting on the internet they are not asking the internet to settle the issue. That's more than we've gotten so far!
I am not a legal expert or well versed constitutionalist but I'm certain that the vetting of presidential candidates was never assigned by any law of this land to the internet. It was Barack Obama who showed his documents to the world on a medium that shows countless hours of videos where people try to jump off buildings on to a watermelon or swallow rubber ducky's to entertain the blithering. Should we take them seriously, should we take him seriously?
I will not callously insult the fine internet sites that exist by lumping them all in the same category. What I must do is remind those seeking the truth that if it is the only medium you now have to get to the truth until someone in our legal system catches the drift, so keep holding the line and know that millions of us are counting on you.
Just when all hope seems gone the tide has begun to change. Obama's naiveté in foreign affairs is looking more Carter-ish and his ability to swing votes in the bailout battle makes him look weak at home or at the least too inexperienced as many have sagely warned.
Then along comes Guantanamo judge Col. James L. Pohl who recently rejected the president's request to halt the proceedings of the military tribunal being conducted to prosecute terrorism suspects. Kudos to the Colonel! Maybe he will embolden the squeamish Supremes and other judges to re-think their refusals to let the matter be answered once and for all.
Until Obama offers more than an internet vetting of his documents those who are now forced to air their grievances and questions only on the web should not be the least bit dismayed. They are doing no better or worse than Barack Obama even without the msm and an entourage of entranced worshippers. /quote
Rev Bresciani is a columnist for online and print publications and now has millions of readers throughout the world
Hat tips:
The Post Chronicle
Zach's blog where I first read the article.
Hello Christin,
ReplyDeleteI really don't know what to say,, but i feel sooo sad,, sooo very very sad for this distraught mother! It seems as Obama has not a heart but only for the terrorist who have no heart themselves!
If he is trying to get on the good side of the terrorists in hopes that there will come peace than he is not a very bright man. According to the the Word of God these kind of people/terrorist are like wild asses that cannot be tamed!
The full truth and nothing but the truth? Barack Hussein Obama is a COMMUNIST SOVIET PLANT:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageId=88439
He is probably right now scanning US military secrets and sending them to his masters in Moscow!
Stimulus? More like: Socialismulus!
Thanks Ted - I am still hoping and praying that a case is accepted against Obama that forces him to show his vault-length COLB. Thanks for keeping up with the topic.
ReplyDeleteTamela - How could anyone not feel terrible for the mother in the video?? She did the right thing by not giving Obama any satisfaction that all the USS Cole victims parents met with him. I agree with the daughter who said OBAMA SHOULD BE IMPEACHED! Actually, he should just be removed from office because he didn't ever qualify for POTUS in the first place!
Rebecca - I don't trust Obama - period. The sooner a lawsuit comes to a full-blown case - the sooner he will be thrown out of office!
Anonymous - I didn't post your comment because the symbol being shown by the people in the video is simply the Longhorn symbol in Texas. I appears that the complainer in the video has an axe to grind and is trying to make it into something that it is not.
The truth, Rebecca? From WorldNutDaily?
ReplyDeleteHighly unlikely.
John -
ReplyDeleteJust because you don't agree with the political opinions and facts shared by World Net Daily, doesn't necessarily mean what they report on is not true.
The Lamestream media didn't vet Obama properly. Now we have a Muslim sympathizer who is regarded as weak by Iran. He is also clueless about Gitmo - signing a exec. order to close it without knowing where to put the prisoners. I vote Alcatraz! Let Nancy PeLIARsi's district take care of 'em all!
ObamALINSKY is trying to turn our nation into a socialist country. The StimuWASTE bill that he and the Dem majority are trying to shove down taxpayer's throats is RIDICULOUS! The pork added on to please all of those groups (like acorn) that got Obama elected is absolutely shameful!
What else? How about the fact that it was revealed on Greta's show tonight that 2 billion is being given to Chicago for a nuclear plant??? It's a pet project of Durbin and Obama - something they have been trying to get for years. So...just how does THAT create jobs and give tax relief?
If the truth be told, Obama is a LIAR. He claimed that there is "no pork" in the bill. Bald-faced lie!!
Conclusion: People will get more truth from WND than Obama - that's a fact.
"Just because you don't agree with the political opinions and facts shared by World Net Daily, doesn't necessarily mean what they report on is not true."
ReplyDeleteYou would do well to follow your own advice. You critizise anyone even remotely to the left of Michael Savage, as part of the mainstream media (or as you so "cutely" say Lamestream media), and therefore not to be trusted, while quoting unknown peoples' comments from some of the looniest far right web sites on the net and call them truth. Please...what a laughing stock you are.
"Conclusion: People will get more truth from WND than Obama - that's a fact." It may be your fact and I suppose if you repeat something often enough you can get some fools to believe it, but that doesn't make it true.
Here's a word definition you might recognize. It's applicable here:
Bloviate
To bloviate means "to speak pompously and excessively," or "to expound ridiculously." A colloquial verb coined in the United States, it is commonly used with contempt to describe the behavior of politicians, academics, pundits or media "experts," sometimes called bloviators, who hold forth on subjects in an arrogant, tiresome way. (From Dictionary.com reference page.)
Once again, TalkWisdom bloviate