Escaping Life in a Communist Nation [add-ons]

Ever since I learned that Orly Taitz had escaped communism under the former Soviet Union, I had hoped to learn more details about her previous life. After reading an article published by World Net Daily today, we all should realize and understand exactly why she is fighting so fiercely in the Obama ineligibility lawsuits.

Meet fierce blonde behind Obama eligibility lawsuits
Soviet Union survivor: President spits in face of every U.S. citizen

More commentary about this tomorrow.

Hat Tip:

World Net Daily

*******
Update: 4/13/09

I spent some time trying to find an article that I read over at Laigle's Forum where the writer once explained his communism experience during a brief stay in the Soviet Union. I was unable to find it. However, I found an article that might wake a lot of Americans up about the radical left's intentions over the years to transform (negatively, I might add!) our Constitutional Republic into a Marxist/Socialist/Communist/neo-Nazi dictatorship nation.

This may help explain further as to why - despite all the ridicule, threats, cyber attacks etc. that Dr. Orly Taitz has been experiencing ever since bringing the many citizenship lawsuits against Obama - she absolutely refuses to give up on the extremely important mission of verifying Obama's true citizenship and place of birth. BRAVO!! She is an American citizen HERO!

There can be no mistake about it. If Obama's true father was Obama Sr., then Obama Jr. cannot possibly be a natural born citizen as is required in our United States Constitution for the position of POTUS.

Take a look at this article:

The Weakened American Soul

Quite the eye opener!

*******
What's more, just in case you can't see the pattern developing further in Obamunism Borg-Land, please read:

SHOCKING NEW REPORT! OBAMA'S REAL TERRORISTS: TARGETING PATRIOTS AND THE RIGHT

*******
Read Communism's 45 Steps

*******

Found this old article interesting! Especially the excerpts below the link!

Thomas Brewton's "The View from 1776": What is Liberalism?

Excerpts:

Quote:

The popular myth that Fascism, Nazism, and Communism are distinct and different from socialism was fabricated by apologists for socialism like Hannah Arendt, the author of “The Origins of Totalitarianism.” Before coming to New York at the outbreak of World War II, Arendt was a German philosopher who had been a collaborator of Martin Heidegger, the notorious philosophical supporter of Hitler’s National Socialist regime and a member of the Nazi party until it was disbanded in 1945. In New York City she became a professor of political theory at The New School for Social Research, an institution founded in 1919 by John Dewey and other socialists to radicalize American students.

The New School’s president today is Bob Kerrey, the liberal former United States Senator and one of the highly partisan members of the 9/11 Commission. Kerrey used every public-grandstanding opportunity to cast all blame on the Bush administration for Al Queda’s attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. For PR purposes, liberals want to scapegoat Christians and deflect blame from socialists in the Clinton administration.

Not surprisingly, Hannah Arendt’s piece of propaganda is standard reading in our liberal-controlled colleges and universities. She rationalizes that totalitarianism was a one-time phenomenon in Germany and the Soviet Union that depended upon a special set of circumstances unrelated to socialism as such. Therefore, she contends, socialism remains the path to earthly perfection. To accept this as truth, of course, we must ignore China, Cuba, Nicaragua, Cambodia, North Korea, and the many African nations, all ruled by totalitarian, socialist despots.

What does, in fact, set Nazism and Fascism apart from American liberal-socialism and Communism is their emphasis on the historical cultural traditions of the National State. Hitler made much of the Teutonic ancestry of German traditions, and Mussolini identified Fascism with the grandeur of the Roman Empire.

Additionally, Fascists and Nazis did not nationalize private industrial companies to the same degree as Soviet Communists. Bringing private enterprise under direct regulatory control of the National State was deemed sufficient. Both Hitler’s Nazi regime and President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal were established in 1933, and both followed the pattern set by Mussolini’s Fascist State Corporatism in the 1920s.

Hitler and Mussolini were first and foremost patriots who aimed to build up and to glorify Germany and Italy. After many years in senior leadership positions within the Italian Socialist party, Mussolini split off during World War I, because the socialists called upon their members not to fight for Italy, but to give their allegiance entirely to the Socialist Internationale. After the end of World War I, he organized the Fascist party to impose the order and control required for a nationalistic, socialistic regime.

Hitler’s attitude was essentially the same. After Germany’s defeat in World War I, he always spoke of the “stab in the back,” that is, an imagined betrayal of Germany by the bankers, industrialists, and the Jews. Hitler shrewdly projected his National Socialist party as the middle ground between the old Prussian aristocracy and the dissolute hedonism of the communist-oriented Weimar Republic. To the German people, battered by war reparations, catastrophic inflation, and the Depression, he preached resurrection of national power under himself as leader and intellectual planner.

Hitler’s opposition to the Weimar Republic, so highly regarded by American liberal-socialists, led to the fiction that Nazism was a right-wing movement, completely different from socialism. That amounts to declaring arbitrarily that left-handed fighters are boxers, but right-handed fighters are criminal assailants. Both are doing the same thing, just using different labels.

Nazi, by the way, is simply the short name for Hitler’s National Socialist German Workers Party. The party slogan was “ The Common Good Outranks Private Profit,” and the aims proclaimed for the German political state were exactly those promised by Franklin Roosevelt in his first inaugural address of April 1933.

In a 1927 speech, Hitler said, “We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions.”

[T]he principal difference was that Hitler loved Germany, while our liberal educators despise the United States.

Can you see the same terrible, blatantly anti-American, anti-Constitutional, anti-Republic, anti-Capitalist destructive actions that were used in the past by these awful dictators now also being used by the ObamaBorgFraud Administration??

I see it CLEARLY!

Doesn't this all sound eerily similar to what Glenn Beck warned about during his "Destined to Repeat?" special last Friday??? [NOTE: There are five videos to view - each about 8 minutes in length. Ignore the ones that try to label Mr. Beck as "dangerous" or a "fanatic." The Youtube poster "ttj1776" is a reliable source over there.]

One comment at video page:

"Zoklor (18 hours ago) depressions are recoverable, getting your sovereignty back, not so easy."

All the more reason to hold the TEA Party protests and continue to pursue Obama's ineligibility for POTUS!!! There is MUCH MORE AT STAKE than just the reckless spending going on!! OUR SOVEREIGNTY MIGHT VERY WELL BE IN DANGER!!!

*******

Offended and Horrified! Nice Deb shares the reasons why American Patriots are organizing TEA Party Protests across the entire nation! What more, she very accurately labels the critics: "The Confused Critics Of The Tax Day Tea Parties"