Watch Rush counter each point of what Obama says in his latest teleprompter speech:
In another story, there is a new lawsuit going on that will not get dismissed due to "lack of standing" like so many of the former eligibility cases (unfortunately) have. [Note: Knowing about the thugs surrounding Obama, I have no doubt that the judges in the cases (and probably their families) were threatened against going forward on any of the eligibility cases. This will most likely be exposed to the public on a future date, when Obama isn't in power anymore.]
The new case is being reported by WorldNetDaily:
Closed Chrysler dealers to drive Obama's eligibility
Seeking damages for lost businesses, will question administration's 'authority'
Two lawyers have joined forces to assemble a case challenging in U.S. bankruptcy court the federal government's use of Troubled Asset Relief Program funds to bail out Chrysler and in doing so may have created a scenario that finally will bring to a head the issue of Barack Obama's eligibility to be president.
The attorneys are Leo Donofrio, who has launched cases directly challenging Obama's eligibility, and Stephen Pidgeon, who also has worked on the issue.
Their new case questions the authority by which the federal government and administration officials intervened in the auto industry, specifically allocating some $8 billion-plus to Chrysler, which later was forgiven.
Pidgeon told WND the clients in the case are former Chrysler dealers who lost their businesses as part of the "restructuring" of the automobile company. They have been damaged with the loss of their businesses, and the case alleges the Obama administration, through its use of TARP money, influenced Chrysler's outcome.
Donofrio told WND the core issue is the disbursement of TARP funds to the auto maker that were intended to help banks and financial institutions. The previous Treasury secretary had indicated such expenditures were not appropriate, and, in fact, a congressional effort to authorize the expenditures failed, he said.
So, along with a bankruptcy court challenge, a "quo warranto" case is being filed in Washington, D.C., demanding to know by what authority administration officials set up the financial arrangements with Chrysler and handed out taxpayer money.
As part of the demand for information about the authority used, Donofrio confirmed, there will be questions about Obama's eligibility to be president. Donofrio contends that since by Obama's own admission his father never was a U.S. citizen, Obama was born a dual citizen. The framers of the Constitution, he argues, did not consider a dual citizen to be a "natural born citizen" as required for the presidency.
The burden, then, would shift to Obama and his administration officials to document their constitutional authority for their decisions and their handling of taxpayer money.
If the president cannot document his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, his presidential task force had no authority to act at all, the case contends.
Pidgeon told WND the plaintiffs in the case are the former Chrysler dealers, and their interests will be paramount.
The goal is "to get them restored," he said, and "put them back where they were before their contracts were rejected."
"Our clients are not in this action as 'birthers,'" he said, citing a term used for people who question Obama's constitutional eligibility. "Our clients are here to seek redress for wrongs."
But the case may open doors that have been closed in other disputes over Obama's eligibility. Most previous cases, at one point or another, have been dismissed because the plaintiffs do not have "standing" – they have not suffered direct injury for which they have a reasonable expectation of seeking redress.
In the case of the dealers, they have suffered financial loss because of circumstances that developed with the government's intervention in the auto industry.
According to columnist Devvy Kidd, the case is "complicated."
She explained a "quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military."
That means quo warranto applies not just to eligibility but to the "exercise" of authority through public office, she said.
She noted the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals already has described as "interesting and unresolved" some of the questions raised in a related case that did not involve the dealers. In that case, once again, the appellants did not have "standing."
"The Chrysler dealers have the requisite injury – loss of their franchises – to meet the standing requirements," she wrote.
The formal paperwork in the filings is expected to be submitted to the courts within days on a motion to reconsider the bankruptcy court's decisions and the quo warranto pertaining to the authority of Obama and his appointees.
WND previously has reported on many cases brought over the issue of Obama's eligibility, including one at the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that alleges Congress failed in its constitutional duties by refusing to investigate the eligibility of Obama to be president.
The case is being handled by attorney Mario Apuzzo for lead plaintiff Charles F. Kerchner Jr. and others against Obama, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives and former Vice President Dick Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
The case focuses on the alleged failure of Congress to follow the Constitution. That document, the lawsuit states, "provides that Congress must fully qualify the candidate 'elected' by the Electoral College Electors."
The case asserts "when Obama was born his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was the same."
The Constitution also provides, the lawsuit says, "If the president-elect shall have failed to qualify, then the vice president elect shall act as president until a president shall have qualified."
The Obama eligibility cases have cited Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, which states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."
Continue reading here .
*******
Also see Lame Cherry's blog for a unique idea to get to the truth about Obama's citizenship issues:
...a rather simple legal request could be filed in the British Courts as follows:
Be it known, as a friend of this Court, this Solicitor and or Attorney, hereby requests said Court to grant acknowledged British subject rights to the son of a Kenyan Colonial, Barack Hussein Obama sr., who in wedding an underage American girl, one Stanley Ann Dunham, produced an infant in August 1961, under British mandate, a son Barack Hussein Obama jr., who is a full British subject.
Mr. Obama jr., has never renounced his British rights. Mr. Obama jr. has only noted incorrectly his British birth right "expired", when there is no such expiration.
Mr. Obama jr. therefore is asking this Court by this Solicitor, for this Court to acknowledge full British Citizenship, rights, return status, voting in elections, serving in Parliament, serving in the British armed forces and all rights, including health care benefits and retirement as is afforded all British Citizens.
An astute Briton, not appreciating the carnage of Mr. Obama, could quietly in the Courts gain full rights for Bearick Obama as is his right.
Once this is completed, that a British Court has affirmed that Mr. Obama is indeed British, then it would be quite impossible for any American Court to not deal with a British Court finding that Barack Hussein Obama was born British and is still British to his day.
Such a British finding would mean Mr. Obama was disqualified without one Hawaiian birth certificate, because the courts do not require Mr. Obama's records, but the already known records of Kenyan colonial Obama sr. and he already known under age sexual adventure of Stanley Ann Dunham.
If such a clever Indonesian Attorney were looking to make an international reputation, they could on Mr. Obama's school records affirm he was an adopted son of Lolo Soetoro and was indeed an Indonesian Muslim with full citizenship rights.
Find the right Lance Ito in a foreign court, and one does not need American Courts, as the foreign courts will do the work the Obama shill judges will not undertake.
The court of play has taken the ball from Barack Obama now. All should be done to promote the sound case of Attorney's Donofrio and Pidgeon. That assistance is in people connected intimately to those in England and Indonesia to quietly produce the results in those courts, so these American attorneys can drop the legal finding into the lap of a startled American Court.
Those who can move on this legally, should. This is the correct way to proceed in this finally. Now it is hoped that others will be inspired to add another wedge to this drive to exposing the fraud of Barack Hussein Obama.
Hat Tips:
Breitbart TV for video.
WorldNetDaily
Lame Cherry
*******
Update: Be sure to read the article at Politico. Comments are interesting and entertaining, too!
Some great comments there:
when the president is politically polarizing and calls half the country teabaggers and potential terrorists, what do you expect? Not to mention the debt, climate fraud and all this other garbage the administration is trying to shove down peoples throats. War on fox news, the czars, bailouts, union bailouts, and the list goes on and on and on and on and on.... You half to be the president of all the people, and the people need to trust you. People did not like Bush per say, but most people trusted him.
Posted By: No surprise December 10, 2009 at 10:54 AM
Surprise? I'm not surprised at all. I predicted this in November 2008. The feeble-minded sheep handed the keys to the Lexus to a rock star with a paper thin resume and all the substance of Casper The Friendly Ghost. Let's bring the grown-ups back!
Posted By: Arg December 10, 2009 at 11:02 AM
Hey!! I like Casper! But yes...let's bring the grown-ups back!
Not a surprise. Me and many others bought into this "Change" thing, but did not understand that Obama meant change for the worse on pretty much everything. a stimulus bill that spent $250K per "Job saved", an assault on my great medical insurance, run away spending, more war (What ever happened to the peace candidate?) At least Bush no secret of what he was or believed in, Obama acts too much like a lawyer never saying what he realy means. Straight up truth I kind of miss that.
Posted By: Sara December 10, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Yeah...Obama voter remorse group is growing bigger every day!
Bush's biggest mistake was following the advice of Rumsfeld and Cheney and not deploying more troops to Iraq sooner. Bush's failure to support a "surge" earlier in his administration cost him political support that he never got back. It reminded me of Lincoln's decision to back McClellan in the early days of the Civil War. It's no surprise that many people would like Bush back. I'd much rather have him back over Obama. People voted for Obama with the expectation that he would work in a bipartisan fashion. He talked about the overspending of the Bush Administration, but the Obama Administration proceeded to blow the doors off of any semblance of fiscal restraint. Obama talked about the need to find common ground on controversial issues such as abortion during the campaign, but now wants taxpayers to pay for abortions. Obama could have come out and addressed an issue like reliance on foreign oil and united environmentalists with national security hawks, but instead chose to adopt a far-left agenda. I live in Florida. We went for Bush in '04 and Obama in '08. There's no question in my mind that Obama would lose Florida (probably by double digits) if the same election were held today. Most independents I know that voted for Obama now regret their votes.
Posted By: JGP December 10, 2009 at 11:08 AM
Conservative tried to warn you!!!
Reportedly, when Bush and Obama met to discuss the presidency, after Obama had won the election, Bush stated to someone when the meeting was over "This guy doesn't have a clue." Turns out he was right about that. We now have a president doing on-the-job training, and so far is failing.
Posted By: Cheyenne December 10, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Yep!!!
People aren't just blaming Obama for the current situation, they also greatly fear where he is leading us. Millions in the middle who voted for him are in disbelief.
Posted By: Mike December 10, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Though SOME STILL WON'T ADMIT IT! Like a certain relative of mine? ;-) Don't worry...he never reads blogs so he won't see this.
Barry obama is plain and simply a fascist, socialist and a marxist all rolled into one... the USA is a Christian nation we are just not a commie one.... B O go home... you are with out a doubt the stupidest and worst president in the history of this REPUBLIC...this country is conservative as a whole... the libs have screwed the pooch and main street America has now witnessed what a progressive agenda looks like and feels like and we REJECT IT!
Posted By: ncletsroll December 10, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Again...TRIED TO WARN YOU ALL all during the campaign!
The Liberals ignore the fact that Bush had to clean up the mess left by Clinton, to include looting the White House and destroying offices. He then had the 9/11 attack to contend with, largely the result of Clinton's foolish handling of prior terrorist attacks. Getting the stench of corruption out of the White House and restoring dignity was also an issue. Obama's replacement will have an even more daunting task of trying to undo the damage caused by this radical. One huge positive for Bush is that he respected the military and he did not despise this nation or its people. Obama can't be said to have done either.
Posted By: Annie December 10, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Face it, the entire Bush family is a high class act--even if you didn't agree with all of thier policies. But they are always the epitomy of genteel and dignified politics. But Obama has shown himself to be positively churlish by running down his predecessor at every turn. Something no Bush has ever done to any sitting president. Worse, Obama snubs longtime allies like Great Britain while grovelling in front of dictators and despots. You have to wonder what deep seated need in his own psyche motivates him to abase himself so shamelessly. Simply put, Obama's lack of social grace makes him look like he was raised in a barn. So, it's no surprise to me that most of his unpresidential antics abroad and leftwing policy agenda at home reeks of chickensh*t.
Posted By: Leo Leone December 10, 2009 at 11:17 AM
Bush didn't do apology tours. Bush loved the military. The military loved Bush. Bush loved America. "The Messiah" hates America and everything it stands for. Bush did not try to RAM SOCIALISM down our throats.
Posted By: John D December 10, 2009 at 11:25 AM
President Obama is a weak, feckless man, and as far from a 'leader' as one can get. We all, all of us, are products of our environement; we can't change that. It is who we are. So too is Obama the product of a 60's, radical indoctrination, of a corrupt Chicago community, who, on the spiritual side, took guidance and comfort from an anti-American, anti-white, anti-semitic preacher for 20 years. He is in way over his head, and I guarantee you that the West Point Cadets who sat on their hands before him last week, the same exact group would have jumped up with a Hoo-Rah if George Bush would have walked out there. Obama doesn't like his country, doesn't get welled up when he looks at the American flag, doesn't have the awe and reverence for the office in which he sits. And THAT is why he'll be a one-term president. Further, I predict, that if he continues to try to push any of his agenda that goes against the Constitution ... you'll see here what happened in Honduras ... he'll be removed from office.
Posted By: Lori December 10, 2009 at 11:30 AM
The veneer is peeling and people are beginning to see that the Obama hype machine is failing to deliver.
Posted By: Mark December 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM
Obama's declining support is a result of his utter lack of leadership, his arrogance, dishonesty, and total incompetence. He is leading this country to bankruptcy and communism. I'm baffled that he can garner 47% support. Before the end of his term, his support will be at record lows.
Posted By: HTS December 10, 2009 at 12:01 PM
It is a sad fact that most of the hate for Bush was media-created, pure and simple. Any minor issue was blown WAY out of proportion to reality ... with OButtHead we have the exact opposite from the media ... the willful purposeful burying of scandals and impeachable behavior. You Bush haters haven't got a clue ... you're all just parrotting the media crap and spin that was spewed during his 2 terms. P.S. - I didn't agree with Bush on all things, especially immigration control, but he did not lie, hate his own country, hate the American people, and generally perpetrate endless fraud and criminal behavior, despite all the crap you THINK you know. History will easily vindicate Bush as his intent was genuine ... Obama seeks to de-fraud, he IS the Manchurian Candidate in the flesh. P.S. - Biden is exactly the retarded oaf I told everyone he would be ... Cheney is INFINITELY smarter than the idiot V.P. we have now ... if you don't know that ... then YOU are a hopeless fool. P.S.S. - I met a kid in his late twenties, it was Dec. 7th ... it had no meaning ... it became clear he didn't know what the phrase 'Pearl Harbor' meant ... this is your 'public skrool system' at work ... howz that workin' for 'ya? And this vidiot generation is going to remain land of the free? I think not.
Posted By: Alistair Sinclair December 10, 2009 at 12:38
At least with Bush he said what he meant, and meant what he said. Obama speaks out of both sides of his mouth and still you do not know what he is saying, nor can you believe him
Posted By: amervet December 10, 2009 at 12:53 PM
*******
Many more good ones, but I need to go cook dinner now!
Posts
12 comments:
i'm sure rush got to this last week ... i thought i'd see it here when i came by to visit.
i expected you might not have been aware of it - and given it the coverage it deserved - because the liberal tennessee media had censored it...
i read another quote where he added, "you know, if you look at the aw-THEEN-tik pictures in my kid's good book, you can quite plainly see our dear Lord's BIRTH CERTIFICATE lyin' RIGHT THERE beside his swaddlin' clothes. if baby Jaysuss feels obliged to show his, why not this bogeyus potius? this is incontinental proof that our muslim-in-charge is hidin' sumpin - i just NYEW it! he's hidin' it! you all better look! i'm tellin' ya! christine's right! look in the book of the rehvahlations - she's right there! listen!..." (muffled sound, as he was then carted away by men in white suits...)
(wearing cnn arm-bands...)
hope you're having a good weekend.
:)
mikerucker.wordpress.com
Hi Christine,
Actually G.W. Bush had an approval rating of 25%--quite a bit lower that President Obama. And in fact, Fox News listeners have given him a 50% approval rate. Interesting!
Looks to me like Obama's self-approval rating of a B+ for his first year in office isn't shared by the majority who took part in this
poll.
Ouch!!!
Poll from this article.
More terrible poll numbers for Obama!
Oh my...
And we see how badly he is doing in the Rasmussen poll!
Negative 18? How pathetic!
thanks for all the poll numbers. i think the difference between obama's numbers and bush's numbers - just my opinion, of course, because that's mostly what we share here - is that obama is making decisions that indicate he isn't owned by either side. as i mentioned previously, the reason i like him is because he weighs information and makes a decision based on the information.
which is exactly what - again, my opinion - bush did NOT do. his approval rating was low because he operated as a lone ranger WITHOUT considering others' input.
and, of course, everyone knew he was just generally incompetent.
seems those mail-order, daddy-bought yale degrees don't mean as much as they used to...
mike rucker
Oh boy Mike. You go ahead and remain in your ObamaBORG Kool-Aid fantasy land. You've got it bad! And wrong, too!
Have you noticed that Obama and the Dem majority in Congress have NEVER let any Republicans in on ANY discussion of ANY bills that THE DEMS have already rammed through (without reading them and against the wishes of the majority of Americans)?? Especially the ObamaSCARE HELLcare disaster! It's Dems arguing against Dems. They can't blame that fiasco on Bush or the Republicans. It's their own internal war and fight. Obama's waterloo...
Some leftists (probably self-labeled moderates) now agree that Bush was a MUCH better president than the fraud we have in there now. Did you miss my post about that blog which expressed a change of heart about President Bush?
And, see this Hillbuzz article about Sarah Palin! It is a primarily gay men's site [Note: Hello Kevin? Any thoughts on this?] that supports her, as well as Hillary Clinton!
You're a hack, Mike. Plain and simple. You probably watch Keith Olberdummy and believe his stupid fommenting hateful rhetoric against all conservatives. I rarely ever watch Olbe - turns my stomach! Yet, I took some time to watch his hateful spewing last night. Ewwww!!! It was tough to do but worth it to be able to share what is so obvious about the NBC (Natural Born Creep) screecher. The guy is jealous of the success of Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Beck, Hannity, Palin and others. It's so obvious...and pathetic.
Need more stats on the failure of Obama? Read this, especially the first AOL poll (not a bastion of conservative readers there) where 67% agree with Sarah Palin that the eligibility issue is a proper concern.
There is going to be a tsunami of genuine, good-for-America CHANGE in Congress come 2010....followed by the ouster of ObamaFRAUD in 2012 (if not before due to a lawsuit against him finally being heard)!
I can't wait!
Right Christine....it's always the"other" that's a hack never you. You drink more kool-aid than any other blogger I read, but Mike's a hack?
You probably watch Glen Beck and believe his stupid fommenting hateful rhetoric against all progressives. I rarely ever watch Beck - turns my stomach! Yet, I took some time to watch his hateful spewing last night. Ewwww!!! It was tough to do but worth it to be able to share what is so obvious about the FOX (tool of the right) screecher. The guy is jealous of the success of Olberman, Maddow and others. It's so obvious...and pathetic.
There, that's better. Have a happy holiday!
Sometimes, you really make me laugh John! At least you are good for comic relief!
Glenn Beck says that he hopes he is wrong about Obama & his cohorts. That indicates to me (and most people) that he honestly cares about what is happening to our Constitutional Republic and is warning others about the corruption going on in Washington D.C. It is becoming increasingly difficult for the majority of the American people to ignore or dismiss Obama's Commie, Marxist, Socialist, radical Islamic-sympathizing, anti-Capitalist, anti-Christian, anti-Israel, pro-Muslim ideology. Not to mention HELLcare and the global warming scam.
Last, but not least, the tyrannical takeover of the private sector is highly disturbing to most aware, intelligent, wisdom loving, pro-Constitution supporting Americans.
But you go ahead and keep your head in the sand like Mike chooses to do. One day this entire hoax and chains that Obama has created in his corrupt gangster government will be exposed for all to see clearly.
Meanwhile, there are some (like you) who will continue to refuse to see what is right before their own eyes. Such blindness, as in your case, will unfortunately continue - until the Light of Truth ultimately exposes it.
christine, that's the must hurtful comment you've made to me.
a hack?
you may call me an idiot (i think you have), a deceived koolaid drinker (i think you have), a person-who-never-clicks-on-all-the-links-you-post (you haven't, but i am), stupid, ignorant, and a liar.
but a hack?
that hurts.
i am quick-witted, funny, intelligent, rational, gracious (maybe not to gary, but certainly to you...), thoughtful, obedient, cheerful, and thrifty*.
and, did i mention, very good-looking?
(* and really not thrifty, as i've followed w and rwr and run up a lot of debt...)
a hack?
man, wow. i'm not sure i can recover from that.
of course, i guess i should expect it. anyone who talks about the President the way you do certainly proves james' points about the tongue.
(remember james? he's in the bible. he probably won't get a link here, but he's worth reading. paul, too, at least in ephesians; a lot of his other stuff ... well, it's an acquired taste, i guess ...)
btw, i really don't listen to any talking heads - olbermann (sp?), or beck, or herman cain, or mark levin. actually, i occasionally listen to the conservative punk-dits; never to olbermann. i don't even have cable tv.
what i do, christine, is read - books. and i make my own decisions and form my own opinions without feeling the need to spout others'.
man, christine called me a hack.
that hurts.
mike rucker
Awwww....poor baby! Want a bandaid for your boo-boo?
OK...I take it back. You aren't a political hack afterall (you just play like one on the blogs?). You are more likely one of the UNINFORMED who has his head in the sand regarding the destructive nature that is this gangster government.
Mike, I'm not the only one who "talks about the 'president' like that." Millions of people are terribly upset about him spending close to 2 million dollars to hide his vault-length COLB from the public. They are also upset about the trillions of dollars of spending, ratcheting up trillions more in debt...all the terrible policies...well...you know the rest. I don't need to go on and on.
Until Obama fesses up about his bona fides, he is not a legitimate president in my mind. You can squawk about that all that you want, but that is how I personally feel. Millions of Americans feel exactly the same way about all of this.
I would LOVE to awaken from this nightmare that Obama has created and find out that he is (speculation here) some sort of secret agent to crack the corruption of Chicago politics and now Washington politics. However, my gut feelings and instincts tell me that he is a huge part of the problem - not a person who would be a problem solver to all of the corruption going on in our government today.
Sarah Palin would be a total breath of fresh air who will remove the stench of "the Chicago way" of putrefactive decay and rottenness that is being inflicted upon our great nation.
With 8 million pink slips being sent to Congress to those voting for HELLcare and Crap and Tax, there is going to be a clean slate wipeout in 2010 of many of the corrupt Dems (and three Repubs - if they are up for re-election) who are not listening to the will of WE THE PEOPLE in their individual states.
I have often stated that it is IMPOSSIBLE for Obama to be a natural born citizen - as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the United States Constitution if his biological father is Obama Sr. Please see my new post explaining why. Therefore, he is ILLEGITIMATELY holding the office as a usurper.
I predict that he will be a one-term usurper. That is, as long as he doesn't turn our nation into Venezuela.
ahem.
temporarily looking past ... as hard as it is to do ... looking past your chicken little paranoia, you reminded me of something in the ajc yesterday:
Pro & Con: Does ‘Climate-gate’ cast doubt on global warming claims?
sarah palin gave the 'pro' side.
here's the thing: sarah has a big hole to climb out of to gain any respect for intelligent perspectives on issues. in all honesty, i read the piece and said, 'there's no way sarah wrote this herself.' one cannot have watched the katie couric interview and come to any other conclusion. i do not begrudge sarah her opinions nor the desire to offer them. i personally hope she's able to secure a legitimate role as a policy maker on the republican side. but she has a big hill to climb.
i now return this blog to its whacky sponsor...
mike rucker
Post a Comment