Thursday, June 30, 2011

Esquire Mag Opens Obama Eligibility Lock Down

While reading at this morning, I found out that Esquire magazine may have, as the article states, "Opening the Back Door to the Obama Eligibility Lock Down." This would certainly be GREAT NEWS! Even if the usurper isn't kicked out of office immediately, just the exposure that this court case causes  may very well derail any chance of an Obamination second term!!

Hope The site doesn't mind that I present their post in its entirety here:

The Courts, Congress and for the most part the Mainstream Media have effectively closed the door to any serious legal challenges to Obama's lack of constitutional eligibility. That is about to change.

Unknowingly Esquire Magazine has opened the door to have the evidence of fraud presented in a federal court when they wrote in their satire disclaimer about their story about Joe Farah pulling Jerry Corsi's book off the shelves, “(a)re its author and publisher chastened? Well no. They double down, and accuse the President of the United States of perpetrating a fraud on the world by having released a forged birth certificate. Not because this claim is in any way based on reality, but to hold their terribly gullible audience captive to their lies, and to sell books. This is despicable, and deserves only ridicule.”

Joe Farah, Jerry Corsi and, now have the unique opportunity to present to the world the evidence that the document is in fact a fraud. And there is nothing Esquire or Obama can do to stop it. Since Obama will not be mentioned as a defendant, he has no cause to have his wonderful government lawyers intervene, in fact his personal lawyers can not do anything. The fact is Obama simply will be told what we have been told, he has no standing. Divine justice is not only just, it is sweet.

What can Esquire do? The only option they have is to settle out of court, but that requires all parties to agree and for some reason I do not think Joe is going to settle out of court for any price. Perhaps all those nasty things the left been saying about him are true, you know that he is (OMG) a Christian! And you all know the motto of those pesky Christians, “and the truth will set you free.” I think Joe will go for the truth instead of the money.

Joe will establish that he has reasonable doubt of the April 27, 2011 release of the so-called long form birth certificate and have those experts that he has published testify to this fact. Come to think of it, thanks to Esquire this action will give WND the right to get a federal court order for the original birth certificate on file with the Hawaii Department of Health to have it examined to substantiate their claim that the document produced on April 27th is in fact a forgery and that Esquire is intentionally lying about it to damage the reputations of Joe Farah, Jerry Corsi and WND.

Saul Alinsky said ridicule is the best weapon, and this is what Esquire Magazine tried to do to Farah, Corsi and WND, but it only works on those with no or little courage.

Esquire made a blunder with the initial article, and perhaps all Joe Farah had to sue them over is trying to restrict the sale of Jerry Corsi's book. Okay at best that might cost Esquire a couple of million, but then they screwed the proverbial pooch and said Joe was intentionally lying about the birth certificate being a fraud to scam the WND audience. This just cost the media their blackout on the facts, this is priceless.

Esquire, on behalf of all the Birthers nationwide all I can say to you is, THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!

Yes Esquire! Thank you for your blunder!!!

To see the National Press Club videos, go to World Net Daily:
Eligibility takes center stage at National Press Club
Even portions of 'establishment media' take note of heating dispute

Hat Tips to both links.

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Obama: The Un-American American President

I cringe every time I hear Obama speak. I tried to watch and listen to the press conference today, but when his answers didn't match the questions, it became a ridiculous waste of my time to watch this puppet of George Soros. Obama parrots all the lies, creepy policies, and America-hating destruction that Soros(and all the spewing radicals in the media who have the same evil mindset of this atheistic billionaire) continuously subjects upon our nation and the American people. I almost decided that I would read the blog post at Patriot Action Network later. But then, I read the introductory paragraphs and became hooked!

The Un-American American President

By Jay Clarke

Something is wrong with Barack Obama. We all know it. We all see it. When he speaks about America, Americans cringe. There is a strangeness to his manner, an unease when he talks about America. He appears awkward and uncomfortable. His speech seems performed and practiced yet, oddly halting. It's reminiscent of American POW's in Vietnam or Iraq reading a forced confession. His eyes, expressions, and vocal tone are disconnected from his words. The words themselves often sound American, but the delivery is clinical and detached. His attempts at patriotic sentiment ring hollow and phony. "Once again, with feeling!" is how Americans are left feeling. He just doesn't seem right. He doesn't seem like, of us.

Before anyone "goes there" and makes accusations of racism, this is about a pervasive, nagging, national perception that Barack Obama does not intuitively understand or appreciate America or Americans. Not our past. Not our present or future. He just doesn't act or sound like an American. In fact, there are good reasons and ample evidence for why.
Continue reading here.

Hat Tips to both links.

Be sure to read through the comments at both links. Many excellent ones that reveal how many Americans absolutely agree with what the author of the article wrote!! So many of us have sensed for a very long time that Obama, his mindset, his personality,  and his destructive policies are dangerously un-American.

~ Christine


I am reading through the comment section at American Thinker, and I feel led to share some of the best ones here:


It's worse than being unAmerican in the sense of not understanding what makes America tick.  Obama HATES America seeing it as oppressive toward the blacks and Muslims with whom he identifies.  He is so blinded by his hatred that he doesn't even register that both these groups are better off in the United States than in any other country on earth except Canada.  Both groups and their famous son in the White House lack all introspection and accountability for themselves and project all their woes onto whitey in eternity.  The United States for the first time has a First Couple who hate everything about the country that gave their undeserving selves its highest honor and want to change it to yet another socialist swamp.  Eleanor Roosevelt was another such traitorous fool with red stars in her eyes.


Such individuals who lack ulterior motive have traditionally been referred to in layman’s terms simply as a variation of a pyromaniac. Most such maniacs lack conscious motivation although they are fully aware of the acts they are failing to stop or they themselves are committing. Typically they will feel intense pleasure, gratification, or relief when causing destruction or when witnessing or participating in the aftermath. Motivation is also classified as pathological and non-pathological. Some research suggests that feeling such joy at horrific situation is pathological. Other research suggests that some motivation for this comes from rational thought. Taking joy in horrific situations for envisioned gains in political power and/or the concealment of the imposition of devious plans are examples of supposed rational decision making. I must say in conclusion that history has repeatedly and harshly proven that elevating such a profoundly disturbed man to the highest office in any country is never a good idea


Everyone knows how he was raised and that explains it all.  Not a rational adult in the bunch and none of them embraced American values either. Our only hope right now is that the Republican controlled House refuses to approve of any new spending.  Second, we need to hope that Americans will rise up and meet the challenge of nominating someone who does embrace American values to run against Obama for 2012.  Who lives it and has the resume of a true public servant who was fiscally responsible and put her constituents first.  That person is Gov. Sarah Palin


As bad as Barack Hussein Obama is as a American Constitutional Republic hater, what then about a fawning Press/Media constantly licking the soles of Obama's and his ilk's shoes? What, oh what, have the American people become to have given these Progressive/Socialist/Communist/Islamist/Marxists control of the American Power Centers? To underestimate the evil of evil is insanely myopic! The telling is in Obama's continued personal approval ratings as he implements the destruction of our free society through one policy failure after another intentioned to reduce America to just another dreadful existence for its peoples within an insane socialist world empire ruled over by the World's tyrants. All the while, the opposition runs the fullback up the middle for the trillionth time and then punts...the only recourse now is a hail-marry pass and how many times has that ever worked? Any rational observer would come to the conclusion that the American people have doomed themselves into poverty and servitude and seem to be loving the fantasy of it all.


They will never never wake up because they want an Obama America. It is up to the America people to fight them everyday. Why do we allow them to vilify conservatives. Why did we allow them to change minds about Sarah Palin. Some people have played right into their hands. They must learn that we will no longer fall for this. If Sarah Palin runs for POTUS and wins it will draw the line. They will become less relevant and it is about time. We have given the reigns of the country to special interest groups who are the main cause of changing our country. How about Unions destroying the country. If a true conservative is not elected in 2012, our fight will be harder and harder. We can't fly the flag, no pledge of Allegiance, can't mention God......why do we let these things happen? Why didn't we fight harder. How could we screw up the greatest country in the world. I love America but don't kid yourself, our values are fading.


Obama reminds me of a European visiting the US, perceiving and approaching America from an outside perspective. He doesn't understand patriotism, freedom, or free enterprise, so they do not come into play in his approach to governing. This is no surprise because of his upbringing. Let this be a powerful lesson to us. Never again should we elect an outsider who does not understand us, or is not invested in our system.

NORSEMAN Today 09:10 AM

This is an article that needs to be distributed. Ironically, the MSM is hammering Michelle Bachmann for calling Obama anti-American. As usual, she is ahead of the curve. Kudos for a well written article. This shows how much trouble we are in. The fact that there are people out there that still support this socialist America hating man-child speaks volumes about the dumbing down of our youth by the left wing education system in this country. God help us!

RunngMoose Today 10:08 AM

Ever since I first heard Barack Obama speak, and every time thereafter, I sensed something very basic deep within him that disturbed and troubled me. I had trouble watching him give a speech........I just couldn't get through it. It was painful. For the longest time I also just couldn't quite put my finger on what it was that discomforted me so. Was I a closet racist? Was it just because he was an ultra-liberal Democrat? Was it because he seemed to be a typical lying Chicago politician? All of the above? I finally wrote it off mostly to his manner of constantly pontificating like a stereotypical college professor/lecturer which, after all, is what he used to be. This is a demeanor that I have absolutely hated from my college days, so I settled on that and tried to move on. Alas, this article has finally revealed and enabled me to understand, sadly, what it really is. :(

Paul Murphy Today 10:32 AM

As a birther I need to point out, however, that he is exactly the kind of person the founders had in mind when they required the president to be a natural born (two American parents) citizen - which Mr. Obama, by his own accounts, is not.

joseph mcnulty Today 11:29 AM

For several years, I have had the feeling the Obama is not really "American" and that for the first time in my lifetime, we have elected an un-American ---or non-American -- American president. This raises the question of what kind of country we have become, but I have been disappointed in America since we elected the obvious cad, liar, and bounder Bill Clinten. Nixon was a crook -- true -- but you always knew that he was an American crook and that his loyalties were ultimately to this country. One cannot say the same thing about Obama. The bow to the King of Saudi Arabia cannot be explained away. Another American President might have given a bow of the head -- a show of deference to a royal who represented an entire nation -- but Obama's bow was the equivalent of the kow-tow 200 years ago in China, something that American diplomats refused to do. His bow was just not politeness; it was a bow of fealty, of a vassal to his lord. And of course the White House and press either ignore this or pass is off to Obama's inexperience -- he just did not know any better. But also read his Cairo speech. Its tone -- totally ignored by the media -- was that of one in the Muslim faith speaking to othersin the faith. Did a Saudi prince really pay for his law school education? Perce Sutton -- a once-prominent New York political figure -- said so and had spoken to Saudi prince Alaweed about Obama. Why would a Saudi prince be acting as a "talent scout" for American law students? Did someone even then see a big future for Obama? Obama is a mystery. There is a secret at the center of Obama that we do not know. He is devious and clever, a true Alinskyite, probably a Lenist since he seems to follow Lenin's dictum, "The worse, the better." Witness how he is preparing the ground for the destruction of Israel while still posing as a friend of Israel -- a man trying to impose a solution and "save Israel from itself." The rediculous Lybia operation is to establish the principle of "humanitarian intervention" and the imposition of a "no-fly" zone on Israel when a Palestinian state is created against Israel's wishes. The Republic is in peril -- all the more so because most people do not grasp this. Obama is NOT just another President. If he is re-elected, there will be a movement to amend the Constitution to remove the two-term limit on Presidents. We will be told that things were so bad under Bush that Obama needs more than two terms to fix them. Besides, that would only be returning the Constitution to the way is was in 1950 -- "original intent." And why should our nation be denied the services of a successful President -- remember, he killed Bin Laden -- who still is so young and vigorous? On the teleprompter, he is a gifted "front man" for -- whom? With all his golf outings and vacations, doesn't it seem that he really has little interest in actually BEING President; he just wants to SEEM to be President in accordance with his agreement with -- whom? This also explains why he seems so fumbling when off the teleprompter.

Mr. Peabody Today 11:34 AM

When belief in a benevolent God was jettisoned from our national consciousness the rest was just a natural progression. It led to the development of a moronic PC society that is hellbent on destroying itself. The desire to be accepted is the main goal in many people's lives. The go-along to get-along attitude permeates America. It trumps everything. Belief systems, self-determination, sense of right and wrong. We have been made to feel guilty for crimes we never took part in or never committed. The guilt-baiters have played their hand well. They have messed with enough minds as to prevent the whole of American society to speak plainly about Hussein-Soetoro and his ilk and demand proper action. Evil now rules this country. Pure, unadulterated evil.

Redhawk Today 12:08 PM

Paul Murphy is right – Obama has shown us the reason why the natural-born requirement was put into the Constitution. Having grown up as a citizen of the world, Obama has no particular allegiance or emotional attachment to this country, shows little concern for its welfare, appears to have no stake in its future, and seems to hold most of us in contempt.
The fact that he could stone-wall us for years by refusing to provide a
long-form birth certificate, and then have the arrogance and audacity to produce an obviously photo-shopped forgery, knowing that no one would have the guts to call him on it, or have a Connecticut social security number that no one would ever inquire about, or be without a valid selective service number that no one seems to be interested in, or be able to seal all his records without the slightest protest from any figures of authority, his sneering contempt for us is, in many ways, not altogether

ozy Today 12:53 PM

Obama sees America as the root of all evil. For him and other communist and radicals out there, America doesn't have the moral fiber to be the world's leader. For them, America is corrupt and socially unjust. Anyone who repress blacks, latino and moslems is evil , in the eyes of b.o and his cronies.

The reason we are in such a mess economically and politically is that it is b.o's carefully executed plan. Create havoc in the system, until it collapses and then replace it.(the Clowerd- Piven doctrine, b.o's other mentors). It will be years before America would climb out of this trench dug so masterfully by b.o. Soros and their ilk.

Observer Today 02:10 PM

“Naturalized citizens …came seeking their American Dream, the freedom and opportunity to build a better life for themselves and their families.”

I am one of them. I live here for close to the quarter of a century, lean more to libertarian train of thought rather than contemporary Republican one (though I vote for Republicans). Therefore I came to a conclusion that the key words in the above quote are ‘their American Dream’. Keep in mind that most of naturalized citizens deeply love this country (much more than naturally born citizen because we remember vividly places we left behind). Still our dreams and way of thinking is very different and that is why Framers of the Constitution were right when decided that only naturally-born citizen are eligible to be a President. Country needs the person who is one of the majority, shares majority’s views and way of life.

If it is true for us, staunch supporters of this country and Constitution, it should be true for BHO who is not naturally-born citizen (he was born with dual nationality due to his father, place of birth does not matter). He is not eligible, and should not be allowed to run for the second term. Pipe dreams I know…

Mike6 Today 02:35 PM

I watched Obama's news conference today and I was struck by the blankness in Barry's eyes. His eyes appeared like two large black voids that worried me. His eyes seem to be incapable of expressing honor and truth and remind me of the master deceivers like Hillary Clinton and Joseph Paul Goebbels. Barry has a huge leftist media following but he has no class or decency and will say anything to get press accolades and get a few more votes from the public.

I am sure that Michelle and Barry would be pleased to send all the Tea Party folks to re-education camps in some South-West desert to re-educate them about the joys of stimulus spending, more deficits, and larger kickbacks to democrat voters to get re-elected in 2012. Obama said that he wants to change our American foundations but he really wants is to take away our freedoms, deminish our proud Constitution. and to transform our bold/ brave John Wyane American/Jimmy Steward characters into behaving like whimpering welfare queens.

oltron Today 03:47 PM

Dorothy Rabinowitz made much the same point in her WSJ article "Alien in the White House." Anyone wanting to really understand the origins of Obama's anti-Americanism should read \The Origins of Barrack Obama's Rage\ by Dinesh D'Sousa.

Kit_Jefferson Today 04:37 PM

When Obama was elected in 2008 he was a relative unknown. This is 2011 and that is no loner the case. He is now well known for what he truly is - a poseur pretending to be something that he is most definitely not. Many in this nation were fooled once. Only time will tell if they remain fooled.

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

By Your Side

Look at these hands and my side
They swallowed the grave on that night
When I drank the world's sin
So I could carry you in
And give you life

I want to give you life


By Your Side

~Tenth  Avenue North

Monday, June 27, 2011

"As In The Days Of Noah" Revisited [Update!]

I have noticed an upward trend in my stats lately where people are searching for information regarding the biblical view of same-sex "marriage."  New York state recently approved a bill giving the right for same-sex couples to marry.  Perhaps that is the main reason why those who oppose the deviancy of same sex unions are searching for answers as to why such a decision is bad lawmaking.

If you have followed this blog, you may have already read a post dated back in 2008 entitled The Days of Noah Are Here.

While checking a Bing search, I found two interesting posts on this topic.

1. True Discernment: Jesus, The Days of Noah, and Same Sex Marriage informs us further:


Jesus said in Luke 17:26-30, “And as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all. Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom, it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all. Even thus shall it be in the day when Son of man is revealed.”

Jesus being a first century Rabbi, like most Jewish teachers, coupled Sodom with the flood generation as a typical image of evil. His intent was to inform his audience that at His second coming the conditions of the world would mirror Noah’s days and the days of Sodom and Gomorrah.

As in the Days of Noah

The Midrash Rabbah Genesis is a specific form of rabbinic literature of ancient Judaism commentaries of the Hebrew Scriptures. It is based on the interpretation of the Torah (Old Testament). It speaks about the subject of same-sex marriage during the days of Noah.

The rabbis wrote in the Midrash Rabbah Genesis that the flood in Noah’s day was primarily triggered when males starting writing marriage deeds with other males, and between men and beasts (bestiality). Based on the account of Midrash Rabbah Genesis, same-sex marriages took place during the days of Noah. There was nothing new under the sun and this is stated by Solomon in Ecclesiastes 1:9. Lot in Sodom and Gomorrah is synonymous with the destruction of the flood generation in Midrash Rabbah Genesis. It states in the Midrash Rabbah Genesis that Lot pleaded all night for mercy for the Sodomites, and that the angels permitted him to plead for them. But once the people said, “… bring them out [the angels] so we may have sex with them,” mercy ran out. The angels told Lot, “for now on you have no right to plead anymore.” Judgment was sent upon Sodom. Flood water was the judgment of God on the people in Noah’s day. Fire and brimstone was the judgment against Sodom and Gomorrah.

The blog author explains that the book of Enoch is not inspired, and thus not part of the canon of Scripture, however the book of Jude contains some quotes from it. Enoch is being used by the author as a good reference resource.


The book of Enoch was written before the birth of Christ and although it is not an inspired book, it is a good resource. Parts of it are quoted in Jude 14-15. 2nd Enoch 34-1, 3-4 states, “God convicts the persons who are idol worshipers and sodomite fornicators, and for this reason he brings down the flood upon them. And all the world will be reduced to confusion by iniquities, wickedness and abominable fornications. That is, friend with friend in anus, every other kind of wicked uncleanness which is almost too disgusting to report, and the worship of the evil one. And that is why I shall bring down the flood onto the earth, and shall destroy everything, and the earth itself will collapse in great darkness.” Second Enoch states that perverse homosexual relationships were the main cause of the flood. Both Midrash Rabbah Genesis and the second book of Enoch state that God frowns on homosexuality in cultic prostitution, and in so-called “loving consensual” homosexual relationships. So don’t believe the liberal Christian theologians, gay-affirming churches and inclusionists. Homosexuality and same-sex marriage are an abomination in God’s eyesight.

I was pleased to see that the author linked to my blogging friend DL Foster's GCM Watch: Why Gay Marriage And Why Now?

John, the blog author concludes:

GCM Watch’s article on June 24, 2008, “Gay Marriage: the ‘days Noah’ return” examined the fact that same-sex marriage caused the flood in Noah’s day in the Babylonian Talmud. The Talmud is the interpretation of the Hebrew scriptures 1000 years before Christ.

The True Church of the Lord Jesus Christ is the prophetic voice to this world. Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand! We must be prepared to start looking up for our redemption draweth nigh. We must get the gospel message out and call sinners both in and out of the church to repentance. Acts 3:23 says, “And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which shall not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed among the people.” That Prophet is Jesus.


Jeremiah 6:10 says, “To whom shall I speak and give warning, that they hear? Behold, their ear is uncircumcised, and they cannot hearken: behold, the word of the Lord is unto them a reproach; they have no delight in it.” If you continue to believe that same-sex marriage is right, if you scoff at the Word of God, if you ridicule the true Bible-believing Christians as ignorant and small minded, let the Sword of the Spirit circumcise your spiritual ear to receive the truth…or believe a lie and be damned.

So you see, dear readers, as Solomon so wisely stated there really is "nothing new under the sun" when it comes to the homosexual agenda!

I know friends and relatives (some Christian, some I'm not sure about) who don't see what the big deal is about this subject. It is as if their minds have been seared with anything but the truth of God! When the God of the Bible tells us that homosexual behavior is sin and that marriage is the union of one man and one woman, who are we to try and change such truths?

But people still try. They use every weapon of human error in order to get their way here on this earth.   But every person who dismisses what I am sharing here must ask themselves this question, "what about how it will affect your eternal destiny?" Isn't that even more important than the here and now? I think so.

People will call Bible-based Christian believers every negative name they can think of. They accuse us of not being "tolerant." But what they truly mean is that they want total acceptance of their aberrant behavior!  Sorry, but no can do! I follow my Lord and Savior and it is HIS morality and ethics and values that carry truth and meaning in this brief life on earth.  What HE THINKS of such matters mean more to me than what those who accept or defend such abominable behavior think of me for speaking out against it.

God has given us every indication to teach us that homosexual behavior is dangerous.  It is sinful, unhealthful, prideful, abominable in God's eyes, and yet mankind STILL wants to push such an agenda upon the world.

And, if you are reading here today and happen to be Jewish, do you follow what these ancient Jewish writings tell you about the sin of homosexual behavior? Or, are you a leftist who follows the whims of men rather than the God of the Old Testament?

What's more, several days ago the UN took it upon themselves as a (so-called) "governing" body to Endorse Gay Rights for the First Time Ever.

We can see how correct Jesus was when he told us that the closer we will get to the end times, the more our world will look (again!) like "in the Days of Noah" and "in the Days of Lot."

The following link has much more!

The World Is Shaking Blogspot: Satan's Very Successful Lie Points to The End of the Age.

Please go to the link to read it all. Here are some devastating paragraphs to consider:

It may sound curious as to why any human would declare PRIDE in the practicing of a deviation from normal; a deviation that actually caused the G-d of creation to send the Flood and to annihilate Sodom and Gomorrah to the point that the region is now the lowest place on Earth.

However, when we research, we find that PRIDE is the root of all sin and the express reason that Lucifer, Satan, was cast out of Heaven.

If Satan, the enemy of mankind, can delude people into actually being proud of sinful rebellion against God and His law; then he is more likely to successfully win their souls to spending eternity in hell with him, when he is cast into the lake of fire.

When there is pride in sin, then repentance is rare. The enemy is well aware of this. That is why he continues to delude and foster "pride" in this deviant, sinful behavior.

This age old plan by the enemy is fast gaining ground.

People who are cheering on (or participating in) the homosexual agenda have been caught up in a lie - one of the most successful lies (unfortunately) to be perpetuated by the enemy of our souls - Satan.

The letters being used to identify all of the sexual deviance's (G = "gay" male; L = lesbian; B = bi-sexual; T = transgender; Q = questioning - or sometimes queer) are all examples of defiant, sinful, unrepentant men and women shaking their fists at the God of the Bible and denying His Will for their sexual lives.

The blog author, Gina Suzanne, concludes:

The rainbow is a symbol which has been adopted to represent homosexuality. After the flood of Noah, the rainbow was given by God as His promise to mankind to never again flood the earth.

Genesis 9:12 And God said: “This is the sign of the covenant which I make between Me and you, and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations: 13 I set My rainbow in the cloud, and it shall be for the sign of the covenant between Me and the earth.

The fact that the rainbow has been chosen to represent the very purpose for which the earth had to be flooded to begin with, exposes Lucifer's hand.

Satan, in his pride, always tries to mock God. The rainbow symbol is mocking the rainbow Covenant made by God to man after the Flood.

Interestingly the homosexual rainbow has six colors and the true rainbow, given by God, has seven.

Notable is the fact that number six, as in the well known 666 of the antichrist, is associated with Satan and the number seven is God's number of completeness and perfection.
Even the very order of God's created nature proves that homosexuality is wrong. He made all living creature to procreate.

In fact, after the flood, God instructed Moses and his sons to "be fruitful and multiply":

Genesis 9:1 Then God blessed Noah and his sons, saying to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the earth. The mere fact that homosexuals cannot reproduce should evidence that this is abnormal and deviant behavior that should elicit shame and not pride.
Since homosexuals cannot reproduce, they recruit. This is what is one of the driving forces of the "gay pride" movement. They try to force homosexuality as "normal" and into the limelight in order to recruit.

Satan hates humans because we are made in God's image. The more humans that deviate into homosexual behavior the less amount of humans there will be as homosexuals, whose behavior is contrary to what God intended for His creation, cannot reproduce.

Genesis 9:6 "...for in the image of God has God made mankind."

Homosexuality thus leads to less human beings and this is why Satan deludes people into thinking it is normal and something to be "proud" of, due to his hatred of mankind.

Also, to the devil's satisfaction, homosexuality means more human company for him in hell.

Those who practice this sin or any other unrepentant sinful lifestyle will descend into the pit and be in torment for eternity.

Satan is the Father of Lies and this is one of his favorites that he is trying to propagate. His ultimate goal is to make this sin accepted as "normal" so as to tempt more humans into practicing it.

Sadly, there are actually churches that call themselves "Christian" which promote homosexuality as both normal and acceptable.

The apostate leaders of these churches convey that since God is a God of love, He loves homosexuals for who they are. God does love homosexuals, just as He loves all sinners.

However, in the same vein, He cannot condone and wink at their unrepentant sin just as He cannot with any type of sin that continues unabated.

These blasphemers fail to convey to their deluded church members the truth: that God is also a God of righteousness judgment, who cannot allow sin in His Holy presence.

Homosexuality is breaking God's law and thus is a sin. Those who practice it are therefore living a lifestyle of continuous sin.

Just like any other unrepentant sinners, if homosexuals die in their sin, they cannot be allowed into Heaven,into God's Holy presence.

Therefore, to the enemy of men's souls, his escalating the promotion of gay PRIDE equates to LESS humans born on earth and MORE humans being cast into hell!

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 - "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God."

Hat Tips to all links.

P.S.  I have several blogging friends who once practiced homosexual behavior but are now released from both the behavior and identity because of salvation of their souls through Jesus Christ!  I have heard many life stories about their transitions out of that lifestyle.  One common theme is the non-acceptance (and often hateful rhetoric) hurled at them by the GLBTQ people and organizations.  Why is that??  If these GLBTQ people pride themselves on "tolerance," why are they often the most intolerant of others desires to leave homosexuality? 

I think we all most likely know the answer to that question...


Interesting Update!

I did a search to see which color of God's rainbow is missing from the homosexual pride rainbow.

Here is the identity of the seven colors of God's rainbow:

Always remember the name ROY G. BIV
Red, Orange, Yellow. Green, Blue, Indigo, and Violet.

Or Richard Of York Gave Battle In Vain - a reference to the War of the Roses. English history and science both at once.

Read more:
Then, on another page I read this:

Schueller House.comSeven Colors of the Rainbow (Hat Tip)

The color that is missing from the homosexual rainbow flag is the color blue. It only has the indigo color - dark blue. Read what the author has to say about the blue color of the sky:

Blatant sexuality in the world has made it hard for people to remember the possibility of delicate feelings, of personal intimacy that occupies the private world inside and has no need to compete with what happens elsewhere. Modesty is not inadequacy; boundaries are not restrictions. If anyone asks the reason why, then the answer only has to be that there are laws for people's lives just as there are laws for the natural world: “Things are made to fall down, not up, and I'm doing as I was made to do.”

This law corresponds to the blue color in the rainbow. Blue is the purest color and the closest to white, which represents original knowledge and truth. Blue is the color of the sky, a cool, soothing color, and it signifies the fulfillment of kindness and love, their peaceful nature which brings us near to heaven.

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Fox News Purposely Sabotaging Palin

The following link certainly explains why Fox News Channel did a 180 degree turn against their own Fox News Commentator, Sarah Palin. The Post & Email: Is Fox News Out to Sabotage Governor Palin?

After reading the article, I think that we may all know exactly why this has happened.

No one can put Sarah Palin in a box. No one controls her. Perhaps Roger Ailes originally thought he could, but when he found out how mistaken he was, he systematically set out to join the chorus of leftist libtards and began the process of deliberately sabotaging her! This is truly DESPICABLE!!

Isn't this a truly sad state of affairs? Sarah Palin has enough fiery darts being thrown at her by the rest of the Media of Mass Deception!! How disheartening to find out that Fox News is now joining in with the evil nemesis of Palin derangement syndrome haters!

Even though I didn't agree with Hillary Clinton's political views, it was so obvious that she was sabotaged by her own party back during the 2008 primary. I thought that was awful, too.

Who are these people???

If Sarah Palin toughs it out and runs for president, I think that it would be the first step in getting away from the powers-that-be who have had a death grip of control over Washington D.C. for decades.

On the other hand, if Sarah Palin decides not to run for president, she will be a formidable figure in steering conservatives towards the best GOP candidate in the race.

Shame on Roger Ailes and all the reporters and pundits (except Sean Hannity and Greta Van Susteren) who are in on the fix to sabotage the former governor! When Glenn Beck's program is discontinued at the end of June, it will be difficult for me to support Fox News anymore. The combination of finding out about the deliberate sabotage of Sarah Palin and the ignorant decision to let Glenn Beck go (although he will most likely move on to bigger and better things!!) has caused a bad taste in my mouth and has increasingly soured my stomach towards that news station. I suppose that I will just continue getting my news from the many excellent blogs on my blog roll.

America? Please wake up!! Whether you like Sarah Palin or not, can't you see what is happening here?? If you are a lefty who wanted Hillary as the Dem nominee, recall what happened to her! PLEASE DON'T LET THE POWERFUL LEFTIST ELITES CONTINUE TO SABOTAGE INDIVIDUAL CITIZENS!! WAKE UP AND REALIZE THAT THEY ARE TRYING TO SABOTAGE OUR AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE, TOO!


Mat 10:26 "Therefore do not fear them. For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known.

Luk 8:17 "For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor [anything] hidden that will not be known and come to light.

Luk 12:2 "For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, nor hidden that will not be known.

Hat Tip:

The Post and Email

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Spiritual Warfare

With all of the chaos, fear, economic crises, tornadoes, tsunamis, floods, illnesses, wars and rumors of wars happening around the world today (with all of such plights increasing at an alarming rate), it should be obvious to most people that there is a huge spiritual warfare going on in the midst of it all for the souls of men.

Dr. David Jeremiah is has a new television series called Spiritual Warfare - Terms of Engagement and he also recommends reading a new book written by Warren Wiersbe entitled, "The Strategy of Satan - How to Detect and Defeat Him" (scroll down at link for book).

At my sister blog, God's Creative Call there is a new post up entitled Ambivalent Confessions? which shares another subtle strategy of Satan that is often used in order to squelch the effectiveness of Christians sharing the Gospel.

Greg Koukl's Stand to Reason website is a library of resources to assist you in your knowledge and defense of God's Word and the Gospel of Jesus Christ. You will be trained to become an ambassador for Christ, growing in knowledge, wisdom, and character through all of the resources available at Stand to Reason.

These days, we need all of the resources available to equip us with our Armor of God, and the websites that I have recommended today are two of the best!

~ Christine

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Update On Fast and Furious Gun Scandal

Received a very informative email from Gun Alerts today. It contains updates about the Gun Runner scandal called Operation Fast and Furious. The following is a copy of most of that email. Please feel free to distribute any way you can!

~ Christine


Stonewalling: Obama Style

We are getting closer and closer to the truth, relationship to getting to the bottom of "Project Gunrunner" and "Operation Fast and Furious."

Wednesday's House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, led by Rep. Darrell Issa, questioned several, some who brought out new revelations. The bottom line: It is more of a cover-up than we had imagined!

The scandal broke when it was learned that the Department of Justice deliberately led operatives of Mexican drug cartels purchase guns at licensed U.S. firearms dealers and did nothing to intercept the gun purchaser or retrieve the guns even when they were under active surveillance by federal law enforcement officials.

"Who authorized 'Operation Fast and Furious'?"

Ronald Weich, the assistant attorney general for legislative affairs at the Justice Department, finally responded to Issa's heated questioning: "I do not know the answer to that question, and the (Justice Department) inspector general is reviewing the matter!"

Despite the courageous testimony of four ATF agents---speaking against the Department of Justice standard answers---the STONEWALLING by this administration continues!

Quite frankly, it will take an independent Special Prosecutor to get the real truth!

Documents released by U.S. Representative Darrell Issa's panel make it very clear that "Operation Fast and Furious" was well-known and enthusiastically supported at the highest levels of ATF. This devastating program had to have been supported elsewhere within the Justice Department. Despite him saying different, it is totally inconceivable that Attorney General Eric Holder did not know about Operation Fast and Furious!

Four ATF agents' sworn testimonies very much CONTRADICT the Justice Department's account of "Operation Fast and Furious."

John Dobson, a special agent for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), told the Issa committee on Wednesday that he was SHOCKED when he discovered his agency was carrying out a plan specifically designed to deliver "loads of weapons" into the hands of criminals, including operatives purchasing guns for Mexican drug cartels.

Dobson stated under oath: "This is not a matter of some weapons that had gotten away from us or allowing a few to walk so that we could follow them to a much larger, more significant target. Allowing loads of weapons that we knew to be destined for criminals was the plan, this was the mandate."

"Yes. We were mandated, 'Let these guns go!'"

Of course the reported original purpose of the project was to track the guns back to leaders in the Mexican drug cartels.

"THIS EFFORT FAILED!" House Oversight Chairman Darrel Issa (R-CA) declared at Wednesday's meeting.

Issa went on to explain: "Over strong objection of the ATF field agents, the program continued, and approximately 2,000 AK-47s and derivatives and some 50-caliber sniper rifles and others and 10,000 or more rounds of live ammunition went into the arsenals of the Mexican drug lord."

Yet, the Obama administration finally admitted that they would "look into the matter."

An independent Special Prosecutor must be appointed to find out who authorized what, when and where---let the chips fall where they may!


No one in the administration would "own up" to this debacle of a plan; especially after U.S. Border Agent Brian Terry was murdered approximately 18 miles INSIDE the border from Mexico - with two of these weapons that we sold to the drug cartel found at the crime scene!

Then, almost all the ATF lips were suddenly sealed!

David Voth, a supervisor at the ATF field division in Phoenix, told complaining agents to back off: "Whether you care or not people of rank and authority at headquarters are paying close attention to this case and they also believe we (Phoenix field division) are doing what they envisioned the Southwest Border Groups doing," Voth wrote in a March 12, 2010 email.

His email was included in a 51-page report by Republican staffers on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee, spearheaded by U.S. Senator Charles Grassley.

At one point, Dobson asked his superiors if they "were prepared to attend the funeral of a slain agent," Dobson's fellow agent Olindo James Casa told the committee.

"I and other field agents involved in this operation repeatedly raised these concerns with our supervisors," Dobson testified. "In response we were told that we simply did not understand the plan."

YET, more and more killings have been linked to "Fast and Furious" Project.

ONLY an independent Special Prosecutor can sort out the genuine truth from some of the "fiction" and "outright lies" that have been told in the interview process!

Representative Issa has been critical of the Department of Justice (DOJ), which oversees the ATF, for not turning over all of the documents he has requested and not making available all of the officials he has wanted to interview, sometimes citing ongoing gun-tracking investigations and prosecutions.

"Fast and Furious" was part of the five-year-old GUNRUNNER program. It authorized local U.S. gun stores to sell THOUSANDS of semiautomatic rifles to suspected and known straw-purchasers for Mexican drug cartels.

By allowing people to illegally purchase large quantities of the weapons from gun dealers, officials hoped to trace the firearms to the upper ranks of the drug cartels and prosecute them. But ATF whistleblowers allege that officials lost track of guns. Some even point to the very, very top!

Issa and U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) have led the congressional hunt for more information about the ATF operation and its approval. The lawmakers have said repeatedly that they are being "stonewalled" by the Department of Justice.

U.S. Senator Grassley, who does not have the same subpoena power as Issa—has vowed to hold up President Obama's nominations in the Senate until he gets the documents and information that he has requested on the operation.

The fingers of guilt point to officials high up in the Obama administration.

Across-the-board stonewalling by government agencies is hindering the final investigation, including the Attorney General. The Obama administration is the most anti-gun and anti-Second Amendment administration in recent memory!

This stonewalling goes way, way beyond any "political maneuvering"---it verges on the dark side of criminal acts!

This cover-up must be stopped!

Many of the whistleblowers have come forward to Congress out of loyalty to the murdered Border Patrol Agent. We need the administration to come forward out of "loyalty" to patriotic Americans who voted their superiors into office!

You see, here is how this cover-up affects you and me directly---when the criminals use the illegal weapons, it puts gasoline on Mr. Obama's anti-gun "fire" to go against ALL gun owners in general; and even against those who believe in our Second Amendment rights! We cannot let Mr. Obama use this illegal act---perpetrated by his own administration---to use against legitimate gun owners!

The Obama Administration is doing all this in a concentrated effort to blame America's gun owners like YOU for the violent crime with guns in an attempt to pass new anti-gun laws to infringe on your gun rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment!

Please help to expose this cover-up! Please help to urge others to appoint an independent Special Prosecutor. Your Constitutional rights are literally at stake here!

I look forward to hearing from you on exposing this cover-up!


Alan M. Gottlieb
Second Amendment Foundation

P. S. We can only guess (just for a little longer!) how far up the Administration hierarchy this cover-up was approved...maybe all the way to the top!

Readers, you can donate to The Second Amendment Foundation by clicking here or mail a check to:

Second Amendment Foundation
Department Code 6472
12500 NE 10th Place, Bellevue, WA 98005


Another blog post on this issue:

Noisy Room: Agenda Behind Fast and Furious Gunrunner Program.


Quick re-cap – Obama, Clinton and Holder deliberately instituted Operation Fast and Furious for the sole purpose of increasing the number of U.S. weapons that “walked” into Mexico. Remember some of the facts:

* ATF agents were repeatedly told to “stand down” as the guns “walked;”

* The supervisor of this operation was “jovial” and “just delighted” when “walked” guns appeared at crime scenes in Mexico;

* No one had “one iota of concern for human life;” and

* “Acting Director Melson was able to sit at his desk in Washington and – himself – watch a live feed of the straw buyers entering the gun stores to purchase dozens of AK-47 variants.”

Why did Obama, Clinton and Holder do this? It’s obvious to even the most casual observer; they did this to further the propaganda they pushed in early 2009 – that the U.S. has a gun problem because “90%” of the confiscated weapons in Mexico are coming from the U.S. – in order to justify more aggressive restrictions on gun ownership in the U.S.

Keep in mind that when the operation was created in 2009, the Obama administration had not anticipated that it would be exposed. The Democrats had a majority in both the House and Senate and any investigation would have had to have been brought forward by their own party – which Obama, Clinton and Holder knew would not happen. But there were several things they didn’t anticipate:

* Agent Brian Terry’s murder whereby two of the weapons found at the scene were tracked to straw purchasers who bought the weapons under ATF’s supervision via Operation Fast and Furious.

* David Codrea and Mike Vanderboegh’s discovery of this operation.

* Democrats’ loss of their majority in the House, with Republicans taking over in January 2011.

* CBS coverage of this operation.

* David Workman’s exceptional and diligent reporting on this operation.

* Darrell Issa’s (R-CA) pursuit of the truth through Congressional Hearings.

Marxists will always tell you that the ends justify the means. Creating the very problem they can claim they’re prepared to solve isn’t a new tactic for Progressives, but this is only part of the story.

Congressman Issa will fail the American people if he stops short and fails to investigate and determine the true purpose of Operation Fast and Furious. To say that it was a dumb program and needs to stop will miss the true agenda behind the creation of the operation in the first place.

While the “bottom up” Operation Fast and Furious continued, so too has Obama’s “top down” operation – the United Nations (UN) Small Arms Treaty.

Did you know that the UN has an Office for Disarmament Affairs? Did you know the Obama administration has been working closely with the UN and firmly supports the UN Small Arms Treaty, which Obama and Clinton fully intend to thrust upon America?

That excerpt is just a small portion of the entire article. Wait till you read what is written before and after that information!!

Go to this link and read it all!!!

Monday, June 20, 2011

Chopra Mocks Palin? ReasonandFaith1 Returns the Favor! [Update!]

While listening to Glenn Beck's radio program this morning, I heard about Deepak Chopra's ranting article against Sarah Palin. Gateway Pundit has the story and links, so I will just provide some insight that I learned about Chopra years ago.

Back in January, 2005, Deepak Chopra appeared on Lee Strobel's television program,  Faith Under Fire and debated Christian Apologist Greg Koukl on the topic of "The Future of Faith."

As a recipient of Greg's email alerts I received an email telling me the date, time and channel of the program. Greg also stated the following in his email:

I think you'll find the discussion stimulating and revealing. I think it's also a great opportunity for the Kingdom. Please pray there will be a powerful impact from the exchange between Chopra and me.

"I have come in to the world to bear witness to the truth."--Jesus, John 18:37

My initial reaction to the show:

Great show!

This broadcast was absolutely fabulous! Greg Koukl pointed out the fact that people can have differing beliefs regarding faith, but that it is logically impossible for them all to be true at the same time. His trust in Jesus Christ and God's Word stood in direct contrast to Deepak Chopra who admitted "embracing his uncertainty." Koukl's view demonstrates a steadfast and true faith where Chopra's view can only lead to theological oblivion.

See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ. Colossians 2:8

The eyes of the Lord move to and fro throughout the earth to show Himself strong to those whose hearts are fully committed to Him. 2 Chronicles 16:9

I gathered some additional comments over at my Talk Wisdom forum:

Messengers of an Impersonal God?
I watched Greg Koukl and Deepak Chopra discuss the future of faith on Lee Strobel's Faith Under Fire last night. Dr. Chopra has written numerous books on New Age spirituality that have sold millions of copies. Greg did a superb job of representing the gospel in content and character, modeling the qualities of an ambassador that he and the folks at Stand to Reason seek to instill in others. He repeatedly demonstrated the problems with religious relativism and exposed the fact that, contrary to his denial that he is dogmatic, Dr. Chopra adheres to a theological position of which he seeks to persuade others.

As a sign of respect for Jesus, Dr. Chopra said that his teaching in the Sermon on the Mount is among his favorites and that he carries a copy of it with him. However, he considers Jesus only one among a number of God's messengers. Not only is this a contradiction of the biblical witness to Jesus' uniqueness, it's also unintelligible given Dr. Chopra's own concept of the nature of God. You see, Dr. Chopra emphatically denies that God is a personal being.

The concept of messenger presupposes two activities, both of which can only be performed by persons. The first is that of sending or commissioning. The summer before I went to college I worked as a messenger for a law firm in Manhattan. They sent me and my co-workers on various assignments to deliver important documents to other firms and businesses. I didn't decide what my destination was to be. Nor did I decide at what times I would go on these errands. All of that was dictated to me by my employer. A messenger is one who is sent by someone not something.

The second activity presupposed by the concept of messenger is communication. A messenger is one who conveys a what? That's right - a message. The task of a messenger is to convey some kind of communication from the one who sent him or her to the recipient. If I were to tell you that my toaster wanted me to tell you something, you'd think that I was either joking or something was seriously wrong with me. That's because we know that toasters and other impersonal entities don't communicate. So, how Dr. Chopra explains the concept of an impersonal God having messengers, I don't know. I don't think he can.

I wouldn't be surprised if Greg offers some more detailed analysis of the exchange at STR's blog so keep an eye out for it.

Posted by KP


Greg Koukl r0x0rz da hizzy
I only got to see from about 20 minutes after the hour, but Greg Koukl of Stand to Reason graciously, fairly, kindly, steamrolled Deepak Chopra on Faith Under Fire last night. I mean, it wasn't even fair. Wasn't even close. TKO first round, except the fight kept going. I have no idea how Greg managed to wrangle the whole hour---the biggest draw-back to Faith Under Fire has been that you have to address big issues in picoseconds, and sometimes you just can't do that very well. So, to get the whole hour with a single "opponent" was quite the coup, and resulted in a much better encounter with a much clearer result.
I've heard from Faith Under Fire three times on three different topics. First program crashed and burned when my opponent backed out. Nothing came of the second two. Haven't heard anything in months now. I don't expect to, honestly (if you go over the guest list you'll see a few names that would explain my non-expectation), but as long as they get folks like Greg on there, they'll be doing well.

Posted by James R. White


In addition, SmartChristian's blog pointed out the obvious fact that "Deepak Chopra is simply a new age hindu."

Why am I sharing this with you? Because no matter what fake persona Chopra tries to present to his fans and readers of his books, the true person (emotionally, intellectually, and spiritually) often is exposed during an unnecessarily mean and cruel rant like the one he wrote against Sarah Palin.

Glenn stated some past quotes from Chopra on his radio program. I will try to locate the exact quotes and post them here. But they were similar to the idea that "we all should just get along" and "live in peace and harmony" and "not judge each other" etc. So...what did Chopra do in his angry rant against Sarah Palin? The exact opposite of his guru-type, transcendental meditation gobbledy-gook that he espouses in his books, tapes, interviews and website!

The debate between Koukl and Chopra went on for an entire hour. I found a portion of the program on YouTube, but the portion where Chopra stated that he "embraces his uncertainty" isn't in the clip.

Go here to see just 5 minutes of the debate:

"What is Truth?": Deepak Chopra Denies the Deity of Christ

Last but not least, since Chopra chose to mock Sarah Palin, I don't see any reason to not return the favor. The following 37 second video is truly a classic:

Deepak Chopra Gets Owned.

Hat Tips to all links.



Via Greg Koukl's Stand to Reason website, I found a link to the entire debate between Greg Koukl and Deepak Chopra!

Greg Koukl - Faith Under Fire with Lee Strobel: Greg Koukl exposes the flaws in Deepak Chopra's worldview

It will be worth your time to view the entire debate! It is one of the best I have have ever seen and heard!!

Friday, June 17, 2011

With A Firm Reliance On the Protection of Divine Providence

The title of this particular post here at Talk Wisdom today is taken from the final sentence of our Declaration of Independence. You can read the entire Declaration at U.S. - Declaration of Independence

During the debate in New Hampshire between the candidates for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination, Michele Bachmann quoted a portion of the Declaration:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness...

Congresswoman Bachmann quoted that section during an answer regarding her pro-life position. What is amazing to realize is that back in 1973, the Supreme Court chose a woman's political rights over and above the unalienable rights of a baby in the womb.

Unalienable rights:

Unalienable rights are natural rights that can not be taken away from you. Such as life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as stated in The Declaration of Independence of the United States. Rights that are given to you by your Creator. They are considered natural rights and not legal rights.

The good news regarding the abortion "rights" debate is the fact that more and more people are changing their minds from the pro-abortion position to the pro-life position. The question we all must ask ourselves is what would Jesus think about this? I think that there is no question that Jesus is pro-life. After all, he died on the cross to save mankind from their sins in order to be reconciled unto him and to give us life. With confession and repentance from sin, and asking Christ to enter our hearts as Savior and Lord of our lives and to indwell us in the form of the Holy Spirit, we have the assurance of living with him, for him and beside him in the kingdom of heaven for all eternity. He told us that he would never leave nor forsake us! That is the blessed hope that we have when we belong to Christ!

As I read the words of our Declaration today, I could not help but notice how many of the reasons why our Founders and We The People of the Colonies wanted to break away from the tyranny being imposed upon them by the British king. In fact, I noticed several of the reasons being similar to the oppression being inflicted upon us by the gangster government of Obama over the past 2 1/2 years. Can you spot them too?

The Declaration informs us how and why the U.S. Constitution was written the way it was - often called by the supposed constitutional "scholar" - Barack Hussein Obama - as so-called "negative rights" of what the government CAN'T do to its citizens!

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Thank God that We The People are waking up more and more citizens of these United States of America into seeing just how tragically damaging this puppet pResident in the White House, the puppeteers dangling him towards their Islamo-Communist-social "justice" tyranny in this depression, and those who would cover up all of the corruption, abuses, usurpation, illegal activities, and tyranny that is being imposed upon our States and people!

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Our Founders were geniuses!! The form of government that they gave to us isn't perfect - but ORIGINALLY, the closest thing to a perfect form of government that we might ever experience here on this earth.   Unfortunately, because so many have forgotten God and have drifted away from His Word, we are so far away from what was originally intended for our nation - a Constitutional Republic - that what our nation has become today is almost totally unrecognizable to what it should be!

I was astounded to hear a statistic that only 5% of the world lives in freedom. Did you know that? We can see the terrible effects that Islamic terrorism and tyranny is causing in all of the misnamed "Arab Spring" conflicts going on in the Middle East. The dictators do not want to give up their power over these people. But the people who have been terrorized by their evil leaders and the Arab terrorists living among them now want freedom more than anything else! And many are willing to give their lives for the cause!

I recently watched the movie "The Patriot" again. [Note: Plot described at link. See the movie first if you haven't already seen it.]

Here is just a portion of the plot:

At the beginning of the American Revolution, Benjamin Martin (Mel Gibson) is a South Carolina veteran of the French and Indian War and a widower raising his seven children. The year is 1776, and Martin is called to Charleston to vote in the South Carolina Assembly whether a levy should be passed in support of the Continental Army. Fearing the consequences of a war with Great Britain, Martin refuses to vote in support of the levy, which is nonetheless unanimous. Ashamed of his father's perceived cowardice, Martin's eldest son, Gabriel (Heath Ledger), enlists in the Continental Army against his father's wishes.

[Note: Additional spoilers ahead.]

At "The Patriot" link, you will read about the horrible sufferings that one particular family (and others) endured during the American Revolution. There is one scene in the movie where the main character (Benjamin played by Mel Gibson) loses his son Gabriel.   In his enormous grief, Benjamin decides not to fight any longer. But then, in one of the best scenes of the movie, we first see a huge American flag rising from a valley area and as the scene continues, we then see Benjamin riding on his horse holding that flag - riding to re-join the Continental Army to fight the British!

The Declaration continues:

To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

That phrase, IMHO, describes Obama and his terrible administration most accurately!!

I have a little research assignment for readers - if you care to participate. Please go through the list of grievances against the king of Britain and in the comment section, relate one or more of the grievances listed there to one or more of the many law-breaking incidences that Obama has done over the past 2 1/2 years.

In conclusion, the Declaration of Independence, in some of the finest words ever written, tells us exactly what we need to do now in order to get out of the mess that America is in [Hat tip to Glenn Beck because he has said this many times]:

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

Hat Tips to all links.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Media blackout: CIA Director Accused of Links to Communist Spy Contact—Scandal Ignored

That is the title of an article that was written and released several days ago by Veteran journalist Wes Vernon. I learned about Panettagate via Trevor Loudon's blog New Zeal:

Trevor Panettagate A Real Scandal Involving National Security.

As if we didn't have enough to deal with, now we have to find out that our CIA Director and soon-to-be Secretary of Defense pals around with avowed Communist agitators??!!


[B]ut in the spirit of public service, which the Post is apparently encouraging, my friend and associate Trevor Loudon and I have dug into the background of CIA director and Secretary of Defense nominee Leon Panetta. It’s too bad that we didn’t have this material assembled before now, but better late than never. The evidence shows that Panetta had a close and personal relationship with a member of the Communist Party by the name of Hugh DeLacy, whose record included meeting with communist espionage agents. By any objective standard of journalism, this should be big news. But the question now is whether the media, liberal and conservative, will take time off from Weinergate to pay attention and examine the evidence.

[T]his is why, however, we are supposed to have congressional panels from the Senate and House—and security agencies like the FBI—to conduct such background probes. Yet, we find no evidence that the Panetta-DeLacy relationship was ever examined by the FBI or the Senate when Panetta was being considered and confirmed for the post of CIA Director. The major media have been even more derelict, content to cover the Panetta hearings for Secretary of Defense in a cursory manner and then turn their attention back to something that is easier and more fun to cover and which is sure to attract interest—Weiner. You can bet that the Democrats would rather talk about Weiner than one of their own, a former Democratic Congressman turned CIA director, who is neck-deep in a scandal involving his relationship with a communist agent and an espionage ring.

It is an open question whether the Senate will take a look at this evidence now that Panetta is up for another sensitive post and senators have to act on his confirmation.

[I]n addition to this evidence, we have congressional hearings, information about a communist cell active in Santa Cruz, and Panetta’s own record as a member of Congress, where he fought during the 1980s to protect communist advances in such countries as Nicaragua and Grenada and worked feverishly to undermine President Reagan’s anti-communist foreign policy and military defense build-up. Incidentally, back then Panetta was a foe of CIA covert action to protect America’s vital interests, which makes Obama’s selection of him as CIA director even more interesting. We know that Panetta’s CIA director of public affairs, George Little, was listed as a dinner guest of Al-Jazeera at a Radio and TV Congressional Dinner, and that Panetta has issued no public warnings about a Muslim Brotherhood takeover of the Middle East. The evidence indicates the CIA may be on the side of radical forces in the region. His only apparent success as CIA director has been the killing of Osama bin Laden, an impressive operation that has nevertheless backfired in the sense of sending a nuclear-armed Pakistan into the arms of Communist China.

Veteran journalist Wes Vernon has seen our evidence, as it has been released over the last several days, and has marveled at the cover-up so far. In a column titled, “Media blackout: CIA director accused of links to Communist spy contact—scandal ignored,” he notes that “…DeLacy was not only a prominent member of the Communist Party USA, but also a personal contact of identified Soviet spies Solomon Adler and Frank Coe and accused spy John Stewart Service, and one has to wonder: What was there about DeLacy’s background and record that attracted the friendship of the man who is now CIA Director and has been nominated to assume an even higher national security post—Secretary of Defense?”

He concludes, “If Panetta’s nomination for Secretary of Defense makes it through the Senate Armed Services Committee—and barring indications to the contrary, it would appear “the skids are greased”—then what? Is there not one conservative senator prepared to raise this issue on the floor when the confirmation is up for debate? Not one? Why?”

Go to the link and read it all. Isn't it amazing that a blogger/journalist from New Zealand does the research that our Media of Mass Deception (MOMD) refuses to do?? Reason why? Most of those in the MOMD are probably commies too!

Hat Tip:

Trevor Panettagate A Read Scandal Involving National Security

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Obama: My Family Would Be Fine With Just 1 Term. Americans: We All Would!!

The current resident in the people's White House doesn't often get it right when he speaks, and many people are so tired of his lying rhetoric, but occasionally Barry comes out with a gem or two. Such is the case when Obama recently said these two non-teleprompter quips:

Obama: My Family Would Be Fine With Just 1 Term (We All Would) - Please go. Barack Obama says his family would be fine if he served just one term. We all would. The AP reported: President Barack Obama says his wife and d... husband and I were discussing the fact that all Obama knows how to do (besides ruin our nation with his crazy, lousy policies) is run for office!

I don't necessarily agree with everything that the writer (link above) at American Thinker states. However, this portion is a gem:

A largely negative campaign by the President's team is easy enough to understand. It will be hard for Obama to run on his record in 2012. The weak economy, the high jobless rate, the enormous annual deficits and accumulated debt, are all going to be tough to defend for the party in power. Most voters think the $850 billion stimulus was a failure. Outside of Michigan, most people opposed the auto bailout and still do. By 2012, the blame for the current economy will be on Obama's shoulders and the attempt to shift blame to George Bush for the "mess he inherited" will have less resonance. ObamaCare, the signature "achievement" of the Administration, remains deeply unpopular, and may not survive court challenges.

In foreign policy, the Arab Spring has turned into a nightmare scenario where the three largest Muslim majority states in the region, Turkey, Iran and Egypt, may all soon be in the grip of Islamists, hostile to the United States and the West. Obama started a third unpopular war in Libya, while waving at mass murder committed by Syria, and Iran may become a nuclear nation on his disinterested watch.

The president has managed to alienate some members of one of the most loyal Democratic constituencies, Jewish voters and contributors, with his obsessive pressure on Israel on settlements and by badgering Israel to negotiate with the Palestinian Authority (which now includes Hamas) on terms that remove any leverage Israel might have in the negotiating process before it begins.

The Obama team is committed to creating or preserving two jobs: Obama's and Joe Biden's, and if the electoral calculus in the spring of 2012 suggests that a new VP may help more in a difficult race, Biden will be jettisoned, too.

Is a bye-bye Joey moment on the horizon???

Next, we have the joker-in-chief finally admitting that the billions spent on the distribution-of-wealth from the taxpayers Stimulus DID NOT WORK!

Yuk-Yuk… Obama Jokes About His Stimulus Failing to Produce Any Shovel Ready Jobs (Video)
posted by Jim Hoft at The Gateway Pundit - 19 hours ago
What a hoot. Master of Disaster Barack Obama joked today that his stimulus failed to produce any shovel ready jobs. Yuk-Yuk. Via FOX Nation: Watch the latest video at FOX Nation reported:...

Yep...Obamafraud certainly is the Master of Disaster! Hey!! That would be a great title for him in an ad campaign! That or "Liar, Liar!"

Recall the millions (or was it closer to a billion?) of taxpayer dollars spent on all of those fraudulent "Your Tax Dollars At Work" signs put up across the nation in order to make Americans believe that the StimuWASTE bill would create more jobs? Yeah...and a CA toll road that heads towards Long Beach had such a sign up for years - with absolutely NO CONSTRUCTION ACTUALLY GOING ON THE ENTIRE TIME! What liars and cheats! This gangster government NEEDS TO GO - THE SOONER THE BETTER!!

But I can be patient, if I need to.

Obama stated, "...his family would be fine if he served just one term."

I wholeheartedly agree!!! As Gateway Pundit wrote, "We all would."

Hat tips to all links.

Monday, June 13, 2011

The New Hampshire Republican Presidential Debate

Several blogs have already posted on the CNN broadcast of The New Hampshire Republican Presidential Debate and I have included links below. I watched the entire debate and thought that Michele Bachmann did the best job in answering all of the questions given to her, as well as expanding upon them by showing specifics of the horribly failed "leadership" of the Obama Administration.  It was exciting to learn that she has officially entered the race!

Some of the questions were unnecessary, IMO.  It seemed to me that the questions were geared towards what could have been "gotcha" questions, designed to get the candidates to choose between something Obama stood for vs. a preconceived notion of a former failed policy. I thought that was a waste of time and took away from giving the candidates an opportunity to expand on the broader issues.  The "this or that" questions were downright silly!  They didn't give us much insight into the candidates personal lives.  However, some strategically got in important information for the record (e.g. Michele Bachmann's background and her children and foster children  that she and her husband raised). 

I must say that the moderator, John King, was SO ANNOYING at the beginning when he kept interrupting the candidates because he wanted them to answer every question in 30 second sound bites.  How ridiculous is that???  Who in their right mind thinks that these critical issues can be answered in half of a minute?  Thankfully, he learned his lesson (or maybe got a note from management?) and gradually stopped the constant interruptions.

I thought that everyone held their own in this debate, but obviously some came across better than others.  Personally, I thought that Rick Santorum did well but didn't get any credit for his performance at the end of the debate.  I thought Gingrich had some good answers but appeared crabby in demeanor.  Ron Paul was the loon that he always has been.  He had a few good answers but he was the one person on the stage that I thought didn't do as well. I found it ironic that John King chose to interview him after the debate.  Herman Cain was OK.  I've seen him do better (like on the Glenn Beck show). Some of his answers were real good, but others were a bit of a disappointment in comparison to the answers of others. 

Although Mitt Romney is considered the front runner in the race (so far), I thought that Tim Pawlenty matched him on some issues.  But Pawlenty doesn't have the name recognition that Romney has.  I thought it was very strategic of him to show the ineptitude of Joe Biden; while giving Sarah Palin a gracious thumbs up when comparing the two as former rivals in the 2008 Vice Presidential race.


posted by nicedeb at Nice Deb - 3 hours ago
The candidates participating in the debate: Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty, Newt Gingrich, Michele Bachmann, Rick Santorum, Herman Cain, Ron Paul. CNN Livestream, here. I liked Ron Paul’s answer to the questi...
posted by Jim Hoft at The Gateway Pundit - 3 hours ago
The CNN Republican Presidential Debate in New Hampshire– Seven Republicans will be on the stage Monday night at the CNN/WMUR/New Hampshire Union Leader presidential debate. Best intro– Newt

One of the best comments at Gateway Pundit:

"#57 June 13, 2011 at 8:19 pm
Mad Hatter commented:
John King should be asking (this or that) Capitalism, or Socialism? That’s what we’re facing."

Ha!!!   REALLY!!!!

posted by William A. Jacobson at Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion - 5 hours ago
Despite the hype, I suspect many people will be thinking about some current and former Governors who will not be there, and who have not yet declared, or who may never declare. I'll be traveling tonight s...
***more to come***
Also, Nice Deb has the video up about the discussion between Congressman Darrell Issa and Fox news anchor PattiAnn Brown regarding AG Eric Holder facing contempt charges for obstructing justice in Operation Fast and Furious (part of the Gunrunner scandal - see my last post):
posted by nicedeb at Nice Deb - 7 hours ago
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, discusses the constitutional authority of Congress when issuing a lawfully issued subpoena to the Executive Bra...

Saturday, June 11, 2011

The Gunrunner Scandal [Update]

For weeks now I have been getting emails from two organizations that claimed that Obama was working to get more gun control done "under the table." According to one of the latest Ulsterman/White House Insider reports, the Congressional investigation by Darrell Issa that is scheduled to begin this Monday could be a very serious threat to the Obama Administration. The Ulsterman Report - Is Obama's Watergate Moment Coming?


Congressional hearings begin on Monday pertaining to Barack Obama’s Department of Justice and its repeated refusal to give full disclosure regarding the now infamous and tragic Project Gunrunner. Attorney General Eric Holder is most certainly at great political risk – is President Obama himself far behind?

[W]hat is certain for now is the overt confidence coming from Congressman Darrell Issa. For weeks prior, Congressman Issa expressed growing frustration at the Obama administration’s refusal to comply with repeated requests to release information pertaining to the Gunrunner program. This frustration has now been replaced by a resolute determination to fully utilize the authority of Congress inherent in a Congressional hearing to bring the matter to full public disclosure via Issa’s subpoena authority as Chair of the House Government Oversight Committee. And with the issuance of those subpoenas, and the resulting scheduling of Congressional hearings on Obstruction of Justice charges against Obama’s DOJ, the battle lines have clearly been drawn. Congressman Darrell Issa is now in a full on confrontation with Attorney General Eric Holder and President Barack Obama.

“This is not a discovery process of what happened. We know what happened. We know that this Administration at the highest levels approved a process that allowed thousands of high powered weapons, basically AK-47s and M-16 look alikes, to go to the worst of the worst on both sides of the borders.”

“This was an operation approved in Washington.” -Congressman Darrell Issa

Read more: The Ulsterman Report

Take special note of these comments:

Posted June 9, 2011 at 2:56 am
“We know that this Administration at the highest levels approved a process that allowed thousands of high powered weapons, basically AK-47s and M-16 look alikes, to go to the worst of the worst on both sides of the borders.”

What was basic aim? or goal to achieve?

Read more:

Posted June 9, 2011 at 11:27 am
Isloooboy said “What was basic aim? or goal to achieve?”

Remember a little while back Obama said that they were working on gun control “under the table”? Well, this is part of that. They wanted to show US guns feeding the violence in Mexico. And use that to push for more gun regulation.

But I don’t think that will work now that people are aware of the fact that it was Obama who was sending the guns to Mexico in the first place!

Read more:
Hat Tip to The Ulsterman Report


Update 6/13/11

More information about this scandal:

Patriot Action Network: Issa calls hearing on Justice Department possibly obstructing justice

Does anyone happen to know if this hearing was made public? On C-Span?

I saw a brief interview with Issa about this topic on the Fox News Channel this morning. When I find the video, will post it.

Don't miss this scathing article written by Michele Malkin and published over at National Review:

National Project Gunrunner


Buried in Barack Obama’s failed trillion-dollar stimulus program was a $10 million bloody border racket that has now cost American lives. This goes far beyond the usual waste, fraud and abuse underwritten by progressive profligacy. It’s bloodstained government malfeasance overseen by anti-gun ideologues — and now anti-gun ideologue Attorney General Eric Holder will “investigate.”

Welcome to Project Gunrunner. Prepare for another Justice Department whitewash.

You can read about the background information at the link, but here is the conclusion:

Project Gunrunner’s reach and authority continues to grow despite dire, prolonged warnings from insiders and whistleblowers that countless monitored guns have been passed on to violent criminals without being intercepted as planned. Following up on leads first published at and the blogs of gun-rights advocates David Codrea and Mike Vanderboegh, CBS News reported last month that Project Gunrunner “allegedly facilitated the delivery of thousands of guns into criminal hands.”

One of those guns was used by Mexican gang thugs who murdered U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry last December. At least six veteran ATF agents and executives stepped forward to expose how ATF presided over the purchase of hundreds of high-powered rifles and pistols — over the objection of the very private gun shops that the Obama administration’s anti-gun zealots have vilified.

One whistleblower familiar with Project Gunrunner’s Phoenix offshoot, dubbed “Operation Fast and Furious,” told CBS News: “The numbers are over 2,500 on that case by the way. That’s how many guns were sold — including some 50-calibers they let walk.” The weapon used in the Mexico slaying of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Special Agent Jaime Zapata has also been linked to Project Gunrunner surveillance operation subjects.

As investigative watchdog Republicans Sen. Charles Grassley and Rep. Darrell Issa step up pressure on the administration to come clean this week about who knew what and when, Obama denied any knowledge of Project Gunrunner on Spanish-language Univision TV. He blithely allowed that “there may be a situation here in which a serious mistake was made. If that’s the case, then we’ll find out and we’ll hold someone accountable.”

Coming from a man who appointed crime-coddling, accountability-evading, open-borders corruptocrat Eric Holder to uphold the law, that is a bloody, cruel joke.

Hat Tips:

Patriot Action Network

National Review