Sunday, May 31, 2009

The Statue


This statue
currently stands outside
the Iraqi palace,

Now home to the 4th Infantry

It will
be shipped home

And put in the
museum in Fort Hood , TX

The statue
created by
an Iraqi
artist named Kalat,
who for years was
forced by
Saddam Hussein to make the many hundreds
of bronze busts
of Saddam that dotted Baghdad .

Kalat was
grateful for the Americans liberation of his country;

melted 3 of the heads of the fallen
Saddam and made the statue as a
memorial to the American soldiers

and their

worked on this
memorial night and day for several months.

To the left of
kneeling soldier is a small Iraqi girl giving the soldier comfort
as he mourns the
loss of his comrade in arms.

Do you
know why we
don't hear about this in the news?

Because it
is heart
praise worthy...

The media
avoids it
because it does not have the shock effect.

can do something about it.

pass this along to as many people as we can in honor of all our
military who are making a difference.

please pass this

Hat Tip: Susan Reinhardt via email

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Perception Is Key

After reading Alan Keyes blog post where he asks readers to decide the motives behind Ann Coulter utilizing his name in the title of one of her most recent articles, I shared my opinion in some comments at the Keyes blog.

There are 27 comments at Alan's blog; many of them are good. There are over 6,400 comments written under Ann's article!

It would be best to read Ann's article and Alan's blog post. Then return here to read these comments.

Here is a copy of part of the conversation going on in the comment section at Alan Keyes blog:

May 26, 2009 8:05 AM
Christinewjc said...
I haven't read the article yet. However, my first reaction to that title was that all the controversy over Obama's horrid death-to-unborn-babies mindset is being ignored by the Notre Dame "elites." What's more, is that those who watched these events unfold can see the stark contrast between the pro-life students who stood up for the innocent babies who are being murdered in the womb vs. the indoctrinated, brain-dead and mentally-dirtied students (on this particular subject) who believe "it's not a child - it's a choice." Such a contrast just might push even more Americans towards the current pro-life majority belief category (thus, the "Alan Keyes fundraiser" meaning) into the forefront of the political atmosphere in decisions about supporting (with both their votes and donations) candidates running for office who also hold to the Constitutional Right to Life for unborn babies.

Now I will go and read the article to see if my analysis is correct.

May 26, 2009 12:03 PM
Christinewjc said...
Now that I have read the article and the comments here in this thread, I agree with what "seekyetruth" and some others wrote. She is on your side, was highlighting and disparaging the despicable pro-abortion murder views of liberals, indicated that abortion is a lawless and tragic form of murder for convenience, and such contrast tells Notre Dame that the backlash will help the pro-life side. Ann paid you a wonderful compliment by indicating that you are in the forefront and a leader in the pro-life cause.

Then, two commenters had this to say:

May 26, 2009 9:08 PM
chiu_chunling said...
I have said before that I am uneasy with the idea that Ann Coulter is somehow a leader among conservatives.

She is a humorist. She is a very talented humorist, with a lot of wit. She is a boon to the community she serves because everyone needs to laugh. But she is a humorist, not a leader.

Coulter is on the right side of the issues, but that doesn't change the fact that she's a comedian who makes her trade in laughs, not thought. Looking to her for political leadership is like learning astrophysics from George Lucas. Or perhaps climatology from Al Gore.

I have always felt that Ann Coulter was dangerous. But I have come to understand that the danger is not in who she is or what she does, but in the portrayal of her (and other entertainers) as the "voice" of freedom loving Americans. I love having the freedom to enjoy her wit, but I shudder at the thought that she should be considered as speaking on my behalf.

In this instance, I think she was just being funny (maybe without effort, I really don't know how the natively funny are funny all the time if they really have to try at it, but then I wouldn't know). Sadly, for her and everyone else, the country has been fed on the notion she ought to be taken seriously.

For the record, I was a little peeved that she left her only reference to Dr. Keyes as a sort of ambiguous inside joke. That's not a very brave thing for anyone to do, even a comedian. And I would prefer Coulter to stick with being a humorist. But at the end of the day there are considerations much more important than whether an entertainer is a humorist or a comedian.

May 27, 2009 10:56 AM
groovsmyth said...
"Looking to her for political leadership is like learning astrophysics from George Lucas. Or perhaps climatology from Al Gore."


It appears that chiu_chunling is too modest a humorist as well.

I also believe Coulter's "ambiguous inside joke" was the antithesis of bravery. In fact, she's not much different from Bill Maher when you come right down to it.

To which I replied:

May 27, 2009 6:39 PM
Christinewjc said...
chiu chunling and groovsmyth,

Who has ever claimed that Ann Coulter is "somehow" a "leader among conservatives?" I don't agree with everything that she states or writes, but a LOT of what she shares, in humor or not, tells the truth about what is going on in the political spectrum. She has a LOT more guts than many Conservative Republicans, Conservative Democrats, and/or Libertarians who often try to stay in the "neutral zone" so as not to offend anyone.

People - it is time to start (or continue) offending!! We can do so without cursing or using the awful tactics of the far left loons. Just sharing the truth about each matter is "offensive" enough to get the left riled up. They EXPECT us to keep silent on such issues - (like telling the truth about this Hispanic Supreme Court judge nominee and her anti-white male racist comments) so as not to "offend" the Hispanic community and thus, lose their votes.

Even though most Hispanics in California voted for ObamaFRAUD (ugh!), they also voted FOR THE PASSAGE OF PROP. 8. On social issues, they vote Conservative. If the Republicans were smart, they would make this known to the general public. Plus, there are a LOT OF PEOPLE who voted for Obama who now regret it!!

I disagree with you, groovsmyth - Ann Coulter's bravery shows every time she appears on T.V. She's not afraid to speak her mind and share her opinion - even though the liberal left loons continue to disparage her. We need more people like her (and Alan Keyes, for that matter!) who are willing to take the negative response drivel of the far left loons; yet continue to speak up for the majority of Americans whose views are either ignored, disparaged, or mocked by the Lamestream Media of Mass Deception.

I applaud her.

I applaud Alan Keyes.

And, if you will re-read my comment, I think that including Alan Keyes' name in the title of her article was a compliment to him.

You know what they say about perceptions. You can read the following in two completely opposite ways:


You can choose to think it means "God is no where." Or, you can choose to think it means "God is now here."

That's my take on it.

Hat Tips:

Alan Keyes is Loyal to Liberty

Human Events: Ann Coulter article


Alan Keyes has another blog post that deals with what I mentioned about the Hispanic woman Obama has chosen as Supreme Court nominee: Sotomayer and the Tyranny of Race


In every important respect Obama's victory in the 2008 presidential election was a victory for racism. First there was the racist claim that his skin color made his election somehow significant for black Americans with whom he otherwise shares no common moral or historical heritage. Second, his stubborn advocacy of the parent's right to murder her child made it a victory in principle for the racist notion that "inferior" physical development leaves people with no rights that must be respected by their supposed betters. Third, the US Constitution has been openly set aside on account of fears that racist violence would result from investigating the facts regarding his citizenship at birth (lest they support the conclusion that he is constitutionally ineligible to serve as President of the United States.) Truth, right and the Constitution all sacrificed for the sake of racist fears and premises.

Continue reading here.

That last sentence in the excerpt sums up exactly why Obama's birth certificate controversy won't get a hearing:

Truth, right and the Constitution all sacrificed for the sake of racist fears and premises.

What a sad day in America!

Second Update:

On the subject of the meaning of "Natural Born Citizen" of the United States of America, see Mario Apuzzo's latest blog post:

Natural Born Citizen Through the Eyes of Early Congresses


News on the Obama birth certificate issue: The Right Side of Life: Gibbs Asked About Birth Certificate; Buzz on $50,000 Billboard Initiative


Now THIS IS A GREAT POST! It truly explains how people were emotionally duped into voting for Obama. They fell for the "triggers" placed upon them! Blue pill people to the core!

Lame Cherry Blog: The Obama Factor

On second thought - "The Obama Factor" post is just TOO GOOD not to post in its entirety!

Wednesday, May 27, 2009
The Obama Factor
I have made a mistake, no not in being wrong, but in the mistake of viewing people who listen to, vote for or term Barack Obama "intelligent" were judging from the same facts I was.

This manifested in listening to a propagandist professor at Columbia University named Schama who appeared on Charlie Rose. Honestly, Mr. Schama who is a Brit behaves like someone who should be locked up on a mental institution as he reminded me of Dom DeLuise in the movie The End, but by God's inspiration I finally understood what is behind the Obama voters in how they see a disaster in Obama daily as victory unto victory.

It has everything to do with the key phrases of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama which appeal to liberals who are suffering from a psychopathy of being an American.

I will explain in this example. When a Christian such as myself hears George W. Bush speak, they hear code words which only someone who has a God experience can relate to. It is allot like talking about being in combat, unless one is in combat, one can not converse about it.
While God is literally emotion, the Christian like all Conservatives process that emotion in logical format in discerning, evalutating and judging.

Now when a liberal hears, "I feel your pain", from Bill Clinton, they are not processing by intellect, but by emotion. It was brilliant of Clinton to scam a majority of people in this way in knowing that a vast majority of Americans were in pain, in sorrow in distress over burdens they were carrying and Bill Clinton validated that pain, so just like a puppy who has been beaten if someone comes along and cuddles it, that animal will cling to that validation no matter what.
A sort of emotional Pavlov's dog is what Bill Clinton generated to get himself elected twice.

By contrast, a Conservative hearing "I feel your pain", hears by logical deduction, an invasion of their privacy and a weakness on the part of the speaker in appealing to the failures. A Conservative would laugh in response to Clinton as his comfort was unnecessary, but a liberal basks in Clinton with gratitude of making it all feel better, by affirming the owie that hurts.
Yes, a four year old response came from liberals.

Now add to this the thing which Birdie Obama was deep down emotionally telling a majority of Americans who are guilt ridden for having great lives while others suffer around the world. Obama was triggering in those self haters that it was ok to be feeling guilty, that he would tear down America that was so successful in making them feel bad for all their wealth, and to the final degradation of America in the way these people feel inside, Obama would tell the world he was sorry for America and apologize everywhere he went.
This is why he was smiling when Ortega and Chavez were saying horrid things about America. That was the America Obama hates as much as they do and that is the America Obama is going to reform to get rid of the guilt he feels too in it's existence.

Bill Clinton triggered it was ok to feel bad and cry. Barack Obama triggered it was ok to hate America for the guilt you feel and to apologize for it.

These are Freudian triggers on a national scale and the Tavistock manipulators had to have been involved as no one could have just stumbled into this manifestation. The entire Obama sect was deliberately run through a maze like a rat on psychiatric triggering to make it drive itself to sheer exhaustion as has been reported, bankrupt itself and make certain it voted Obama no matter what.

Now for the kicker in this which is the amazing part. If one recalls every time one of these liberals gets into office, the entire entourage is always triumphed as the most intelligent people to ever walk the planet.
Schama and Rose were both straight faced in saying this again about Obama and Axelrod. Schama even posed Obama as William Jennings Bryant, one of the most historically gifted speakers in America.

For people who were not swayed by Obama's monkey in his pants nor for his spell of guilt by Obamanation, those comparisons would be most puzzling to them as all they heard was a rather incoherent Obama, stuttering at times, saying things which were quite boring and nothing that marked prose nor intelligence.
That though is the key in this as Obama, once he triggered the either sexual desires in people, the revenge desires in latinos and blacks against white America or allowed people like Harry Smith to con themselves into believing they weren't racists..............these people had the emotional salivation like Pavlov's dog to a bell. They had been fed. The next step is always with these intellectuals like Rose or Schama is to repair backwards from their emotional triggers which have just been satisfied to MAKE THE TRIGGER THE MOST INTELLIGENT THING TO EVER WALK THE PLANET as this group couches all it is in intelligence.

They will tell you they are more intelligent than Conservatives, when the statistics prove otherwise. They being defeated in the physical world, retreat to a mental veiled world where they deem themselves superior and all inferior, except those who SPEAK TO THEIR EMOTIONS and those people then elevated to "intelligent" as they trigger things in them.

This is what has been missed completely by everyone in this, because liberals are defining intelligence in Obama by how he validates their shame in being Americans.

It does not matter that Obama has bankrupted America, that Axelrod runs the reporters around like Stalin on a leash, that Obama throws flowers at memorials, that Obama has caused the nuclear situation in North Korea, that there are massive foreign policy disasters culiminating due to Obama being inept nor that Obama makes sport of Special Olympics children. None of that matters, because these Obamaniacs are not hearing reality. Their emotions have made them blind. Obama has justified their guilt and that is all that matters to them, because if they deny Obama and note him as being a failure, then they have to take back that guilt and hatred for American success which they think they just were exorcised from.

I knew these people were suffering from a mania. I just never in logical deduction processed they would change the meaning of words like intelligence, when they were in psychopathy speaking about dark emotions being exorcised.

This is how a nation of rather disturbed people was manipulated in their mental problems to vote for a very mundane 10 year old boy named Obama in literally hallucinating him to be intelligent while constantly pounding George Bush who was very intelligent as stupid and Dick Cheney personified as "evil" in their minds due to his success.
That is what is behind Obama's psychotic attacks on the Bush presidency which has led him to absolutely dangerous policies in letting terrorists go, making American cities terrorist targets and the growing problem of communist terror states in North Korea and Iran.

A nation of crazy people literally had their bells rung and they voted for a crazy person they were hallucinating as being their Prince Charming, when the only charm Obama had was a demon monkey in his pants feeding that incubus feel good emotion driving the leg tingler crowd.

Being a sane person in God's Grace, it is difficult at times like these to actually find empathy in the Obama insanity driving so many, as this would never occur to me, thankfully.

But the Holy Spirit does see all and reveals to those who wait upon God.

These people are not hearing intelligence. They are hearing emotional triggers they are succeptable to and then deeming it in emotional process, "intelligence", as that is the god they hide in to protect them from the hurtful world.

Now though as Paul Harvey would say, "You know the rest of the story".

agtG 240 /quote

HAT TIP: Lame Cherry Blog

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

This Is A Great Letter!

Exclusive: A Letter to Rupert Murdoch on the Obama Birth Certificate Question
by DefendUSx

May 27, 2009 02:49

Please note that Rupert Murdoch owns most of the news agencies in the country. He is a "Media Mongul" and a Globalist who has attended Bilderberg meetings (this last one too, if i'm not mistaken) for destroying America's sovereignty thus achieving the next step in a global government geopolitical agenda. This is a very well written letter, but will not change Murdoch's views. He is in way too deep with the "Elites".

From Family Security Matters
May 27, 2009 (letter sent on 14th)
John D. Hemenway, Esq.

Editor’s note: The following is a letter written by John D. Hemenway, Esq. that was sent to NewsCorp CEO Rupert Murdoch via certified mail.

May 14, 2009

Dear Rupert,

You will likely not have retained a clear memory of me from Worcester College in the early fifties. Much time has elapsed from when we both read “P.P.E.” under Asa Briggs and the others. I had looked forward to cementing our friendship when the death of your father caused you simply to “disappear” from those at Worcester.

Much later, during several visits to my Washington, D.C. home, my moral tutor, David Mitchell, filled me in on the magnificent assistance you provided the College. Perhaps you also had something to do with the “Mitchell Building” erected just off Walton Street.

Everyone who shares your views is pleased at the nearly unprecedented success story you have made of your life. I was very pleased when you became an American, even if some persons attributed your motivation as calculated to expand your economic interests. Pure jealousy! You and your accomplishments have been good for us all.

From time to time, I try to keep up with interesting details concerning your news empire. From that reading, I am certain you and I have many opinions in common. I subscribe to the N.Y. Post, which one can acknowledge is “tabloidish,” but describes real N.Y. City life and the Post’s editorial staff certainly offers solid opinions pertaining to U.S. governmental problems. “Fox News” also makes an outstanding contribution to public awareness of the issues confronting the country.

You may recall the vital contribution Worcester’s Provost John Masterman made to the winning of WWII; he was a key figure, as I remember, in organizing the counter-espionage effort against the Nazis. I write you now concerning a problem nearly of that magnitude.

Rupert Murdoch, Chairman, N.Y. Post
1211 Avenue of the America
New York, N.Y. 10036

That problem is this: the man now occupying the White House is likely Constitutionally unqualified to hold the office. As an adopted American, you will have studied the U.S. Constitution better than many Americans, and from P.P.E. studies know that the Constitution has flexible clauses and hard, literal clauses. One of the latter is the requirement of Article II, Section 1, which states: “No person except a natural-born citizen…shall be eligible to the Office of the President.”

There are indications that Obama cannot meet that requirement. As an attorney, I facilitated a lawsuit (Hollister vs. Soetoro et al.) in the United States District Court (D.C. Circuit) demanding that Obama produce his birth certificate or satisfactory substitute evidence. There are about 20 similar lawsuits across the nation. In my case, U.S. District Court Judge Robertson (a Clinton appointee), who summarily dismissed the case, and is rumored to be seeking an Obama appointment, wrote that Obama’s eligibility had been “blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America’s vigilant citizenry.” In other words, he accepted internet “blogs” in lieu of actual evidence.

He ordered me to “show cause” why I should not be sanctioned for promotion of a “frivolous” lawsuit. (It is significant that, although dismissed, none of the twenty odd similar legal actions have been designated by the responsible judge as “frivolous.”)

Other lawsuits have usually been dismissed for “lack of standing” including a lawsuit brought by Presidential candidate, Ambassador Alan Keyes. If anyone has standing, it is an actual Presidential contender. I provided Judge Robertson 37 pages of explanation as to “why I should not be held in contempt” and he decided to “reprimand” me instead of his threatened sanctions. That case is now under appeal.

Any rational person with even partial knowledge of the facts must know that Obama-cum-Soetoro is desperate to conceal something he does not want known. I believe he is hiding the fact that he and his campaign conspired to assert eligibility for the Presidential office to which he well may not be entitled. In other parts of the world, this would be known as a coup d’etat.

Yet, “mainstream” news services, members of officialdom, judges, including justices of the U.S. Supreme Court have all failed to demand documentation to prove or disprove Obama’s qualifications to serve in the White House.

It is as if a 53% vote is a substitute for an actual determination of the legal qualifications of Obama to be President. It is also evident that consequential people in America all believe the “vetting” of qualifications to be a presidential candidate should have been someone else’s responsibility. Revelation of this massive collapse of the fundamentals of the electoral process (ensuring candidate eligibility) at this point would make some very important people look hopelessly incompetent and inept.

Sadly, that includes your “Fox News.” There are reports that top management of Fox instructed its commentators to stay away from the subject – a strange position for a service that deservedly won a reputation for “fair and balanced” reporting. I cannot believe that you would issue such an order, with your good sense. Was it Roger Ailes or someone else? When I worked with Accuracy in Media (AIM) several decades ago, news manipulation by Ailes never filled the staff with confidence. On May 1, Sean Hannity referred to Ailes as his “boss!”

It is also disturbing that a report circulates that a Saudi national who bought enough stock to win a seat on the board of Fox’s parent company, a Saudi prince, asked you to stop Fox from referring to Muslim youth unrest as “Muslim” riots – he boasted later at a conference in Dubai, that after a phone call to you, thirty minutes later, Fox removed the banner from the bottom of its screen, “Muslim” riots. Given this revelation, many FOX devotees are wondering why the eligibility issue has been ignored by your network.

This constitutional question is one of vital importance to the U.S. It is not as if we wanted to startle our contemporaries with actions calculated to stir up our contemporaries as you once did at Worcester with your bust of Lenin. Or as I did when ruffling feathers of our stuffy dean (who guarded the door of “his” library from allowing anyone actually to touch one of his rare books). After you left for Australia to tend to family problems, I hung a huge American flag from the windows of the Nuffield Building on the 4th of July. The dean’s order (conveyed to me by my scout) still rings in my ears, “Take that damn thing down!”

The “natural-born” clause in our Constitution is a rigid, not a flexible clause. In that respect, it is analogous to the banning of “cruel or unusual” punishments, a clause dear to the hearts of our founding fathers. They certainly heard tales from their grandfathers drawn directly from English experience of ingenious cruelties accompanying the crime of “Regicide” after “dictator” Oliver Cromwell died peacefully in his bed. The fact that the English could not devise a way to govern themselves without inviting the king back may suggest that you modify somewhat your prediction (which I read somewhere) that this will be the last British generation that will live under a monarchy! I recall the first review of my educational “progress” at term’s end in “Hall” at Worcester when David Mitchell described my understanding of English history as limited to “King John was a bad king!”

Since you are now an American, and a good one, too, I have no doubt that you will seek to support the Constitution every way you think wise. Consider that, having won election on a campaign that promised “openness and transparency,” Obama now has spent close to $1 million for concealment of his birth and academic records, which are the only means to prove his eligibility. A birth certificate would cost less than $20.00 to request from the State of Hawaii.

Obama has produced no documents at all that would support his claim to eligibility to office. Is it no longer responsible to claim that “the public has a right to know the truth?” Moreover, even if born in Hawaii, as he claims, Obama’s travel to Pakistan (when Americans reportedly were banned from travel there) in 1981 raises other, complicated issues.

Why did his supporters produce a misleading “certification of live birth” instead of an actual vault birth certificate? Forensic experts have testified that the Certification of Live Birth is a forgery; written on a laser printer, when such printers were not available in 1961.

This evokes shades of Richard Nixon’s problems with typewriters (not just once, re: Alger Hiss; but a second time, when Nixon was caught back-dating documents for the I.R.S.) It makes me proud that in his secret tapes, Nixon referred to me, saying, “Fire the son-of-a-bitch, he’s done this before!” – a reference to my testimony before the Senate against incompetent or dishonest Nixon appointees, such as Helmut Sonnenfeldt (known locally as “Kissinger’s Kissinger) who failed confirmation as Deputy Secretary of Treasury because of my testimony before the Senate Finance Committee.

I also testified against the first “career” foreign service officer ever to fail confirmation in the 182 year history of the U.S. Senate: Howard Mace, who was Director of Personnel of the Department of State, who lost his appointment as Ambassador to Sierra Leone. Senate testimony may ultimately prove useful in this Obama matter, despite the composition of the Congress at this time.

Nixon’s firing order directly led me to study law at Howard University, the prestigious largely African-American University in Washington, D.C. Nixon’s denunciation of me, in fact, boosted me in the eyes of the Dean at Howard and got me to this point.

In conclusion, I can tell you this as fact. America badly needed your brilliant creation: Fox News. But if Fox News really is to be a voice for rational conservatism in the United States, it cannot ignore this vital constitutional question: We have a man occupying the White House who refuses to disclose the very documents that would legitimate his Presidency. Was it not a cover-up that undid Richard Nixon? Please instruct your personnel from Roger Ailes on down that they are encouraged (not forbidden) to report all of the news, including that pertaining to Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.

With best regards, your supporter, friend, and admirer,
John D. Hemenway Contributor John D. Hemenway, Esq. is a World War II veteran, Naval Academy graduate and a Rhodes scholar.

Even though Murdoch is unlikely to do anything about this request, it is good to let him know that a former buddy of his is highly concerned about ObamaFRAUD's ineligibility for POTUS.



Hat Tip:

Repub X

Monday, May 25, 2009

My Savior's Always There For Me

My daughter and I recently got into a conversation regarding those who label themselves as atheist, agnostic, or skeptics. She shared her belief that many such people are often highly intelligent. Despite the fact that they have heard the Gospel, - they choose not to believe it is Truth. She mentioned that they are probably "too intelligent for their own good."

There is a LOT of truth to her statement!

God favors faith and wisdom over and above intelligence. That is why the Bible tells us that we are to "become as little children" - trusting and believing in His Son for our salvation.

My daughter also mentioned to me that there is a man who stands on the sidewalk of her college campus with a sign that reads, "religion is a crutch." That sign angers her and she often wanted to confront the man with some facts about FAITH in Jesus Christ - and the difference between KNOWING THE SAVIOR - vs. just believing in a "religion."

People can be sincere in their "religious" beliefs - including the religious belief of atheism, agnosticism, or skepticism. However, they can be (and often are - according to the Bible) sincerely WRONG in such anti-
God beliefs.

The facts are undeniable about Jesus. Jesus Christ is a genuine historical Person who lived, preached the Gospel during his three year ministry on earth, performed miracles among thousands of witnesses, healed the sick, the disabled, and the demon-possessed; and brought some back to life from death. Christ was crucified for our sins, died, and was buried. Three days later, he rose from the dead as he previously said he would.

This proves who He is.

Every other religious leader died - and stayed dead in the grave. However, Christ's tomb was, is, and forevermore remains empty!

Contrary to what the man on campus with the sign thinks, the truth is that belief in Jesus Christ is no crutch. It is salvation for the lost. The only way to be reconciled to the Father for all eternity. As Aaron Shust states in his beautiful song, "My Savior, My God" -

My strength, my solace from this spring;
That He who lives to be my King
Once died to be my Savior

That He would leave His place on high
And come for sinful man to die
You count it strange, so once did I
Before I knew my Savior

I just love this song! I think that you will too!

The video below is Aaron Shust performing "My Savior, My God" on The Logan Show. A simple but beautiful and passionate song that shares the eternal message of Jesus Christ being our Savior and King of our lives here on this earth - and for all eternity!




Link to Aaron Shust: My Savior My God music video

Lyrics to My Savior My God :

I am not skilled to understand
What God has willed, what God has planned
I only know at His right hand
Stands one who is my Savior

I take Him at His word and deed
Christ died to save me; this I read
And in my heart I find a need
Of Him to be my savior

That He would leave His place on high
And come for sinful man to die
You count it strange, so once did I
Before I knew my Savior

Chorus (2x's)
My Savior loves, My Savior lives
My Savior's always there for me
My God: He was, my God; He is
My God is always gonna be

Yes, living, dying, let me bring
My strength, my solace from this spring;
That He who lives to be my King
Once died to be my Savior

That He would leave His place on high
And come for sinful man to die
You count it strange, so once did I
Before I knew my Savior

Chorus (2x's)


Chorus: (2x's)

My Savior loves, My Savior lives
My Savior loves, My Savior lives
[ My Savior My God Lyrics on ]


P.S. Play "Give It All Away" too! Another beautiful worship song!

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Two Flight 93 Memorial Project Commissioners Quit

Two Memorial Project Commission members quit over the Project’s bad behavior

Blogburst logo, petition

Two Pennsylvanian’s quit the Flight 93 Memorial Commission last week, protesting Park Service plans to condemn five crash-site properties that it never negotiated for in good faith. Consider the case of the Lambert family, who have been on their land for three generations:
"It's absolutely a surprise. I'm shocked by it. I'm disappointed by it," said Tim Lambert, who owns nearly 164 acres that his grandfather bought in the 1930s. The park service plans to condemn two parcels totaling about five acres — land, he said, he had always intended to donate for the memorial.

"To the best of my knowledge and my lawyer, absolutely no negotiations have taken place with the park service where we've sat down and discussed this," Lambert said.

Lambert said he had mainly dealt with the Families of Flight 93 and said he's provided the group all the information it's asked for, including an appraisal.
They are condemning land that he was trying to GIVE to them, just because he had the gall to expect the Park Service to actually do its part.

Project members have embraced the “absolute moral authority” conceit

How dare anyone not rush to give these grieving 9/11 family members whatever they want? Didn’t they hear Maureen Dowd’s proclamation that “the moral authority of parents who bury children killed in Iraq [or on 9/11] is absolute”?

When crash-site owner Mike Svonavec put up a donation box to try to cover some of the cost of hiring security guards for the hugely popular Temporary Memorial, Patrick White, cousin of Flight 93 hero Louis Nacke, told the press:
That land has been paid for with 40 lives ... the donation box is an insult to that cost.
When Svonavec insisted that the Park Service follow its own legally required procedures for assessing property values (procedures that, as it happens, take into account current property values, not just pre-crash property values), White accused Svonavec of trying to profit from the blood of his cousin:
"I think Svonavec believes his land, because it has the blood of my cousin and 39 other people, it's worth more," he said.

Using the flag of victim-hood to defend Paul Murdoch’s terrorist memorial mosque

Project members use the same trick to deflect criticism of the giant Islamic-shaped crescent that is now being built on the crash-site. When people point out the hidden terrorist memorializing features—things that no one knew about when the Crescent of Embrace design was chosen—like the Mecca-orientation of the giant crescent, or the 44 glass blocks emplaced along the flight path, Project members not only deny these easy to verify facts, but they pretend that they are being accused of intending to honor the terrorists:
“That’s an absolute, unequivocal fabrication that is being portrayed as fact,” said Edward Felt’s brother, Gordon Felt [about the 44 blocks claim].

He says he is insulted people would believe he would participate in anything that honored his brother's killers.
In The Church of Liberalism, Ann Coulter slammed the media for granting the Jersey Girls an “absolute moral authority” card, not questioning the Girls’ practice of blaming the Bush administration instead of al Qaeda for their husband's deaths on 9/11. The Jersey Girls were bad enough, but nowhere is the flag of victim-hood being used to cover up more bad behavior than at the Memorial Project.

Active cover-up of an ongoing Islamic supremacist plot

Like the Jersey Girls, the Memorial Project gives Islam a pass for 9/11. Project members might not have known about the Mecca-orientation of the Crescent of Embrace, but they DID know that it was a giant Islamic-shaped crescent. Now they are doing far worse. Now they DO know that the giant crescent points almost exactly at Mecca, and are consistently misleading the press about it.

Their own Muslim consultant told them not to worry about the Mecca-oriented crescent, claiming that it can’t be seen as a mihrab (the Mecca-direction indicator around which every mosque is built) unless it points EXACTLY at Mecca (a claim that was contradicted earlier this month by Saudi religious authorities).

So what does Project Supervisor Joanne Hanley say when asked about the Mecca-orientation claim?
The only thing that orients the memorial is the crash site.
They are actively and knowingly covering up clear evidence of an ongoing al Qaeda sympathizing plot. Bad behavior indeed.

To join our blogbursts, just send your blog's url.
1389 Blog - Antijihadist TechA Defending CrusaderA Fine Line Between Stupid and CleverA Liberal's Worst NightmareACT Golden GateAl SalibiyyahAlamo City PunditAll American BloggerAlmost Midnight in the WestAmerican CommentariesAnd Here I Go: Yesterday, Today and TomorrowAnd Rightly SoAnimal FarmAnne Arundel Maryland Politicsapocryphal EVIDENCE !ARRA News ServiceAtlas ShrugsAuntie Coosa Campfire JournalBare Naked IslamBattle Dress UBecause I'm RightBest DestinyBig Dog's WeblogBig SiblingBlackboot Jacksblogito, ergo, sumBob McCarty WritesBoston MaggieCao2's WeblogCao's BlogChaotic Synaptic ActivityChester StreetChicago RayChristmas GhostClassic LiberalClay RitterClay's Rants and MusingsCocked and LoadedColonel Robert Neville Always Dresses for DinnerCommon Sense JunctionConcrete BobCovertressCreeping ShariaDC Protest WarriorDemocrat = SocialistDr. Bulldog and RoninError TheoryEW1’s Intercept LogFaultline USAFlanders FieldsFlopping AcesFounding Fathers of the Vast Right WingFour PointerFrancase PlaceFreedom Ain't FreeFreedom WarriorFreedom's EnemiesFried Green OnionsFrom My Position On the Way!Ft. Hard KnoxGarbanzo ToonsGeneral Rachel's WeblogGeneral Rachel's weblogGM's CornerGunservativelyHaid DasalamiHard to SwallowHeretics CrusadeHolger AwakensHollywood ConservativeHoosier Army MomI Own The WorldIronic Surrealism v3.0Ivy League ConservativesI'm Having A Thought HereJack LewisJihad PressJim-Rose - the Libertarian PopinjayJudge RightJust Barking Madkae's bloodnut blogKender's MusingsLemur King's FollyLGF 2.0: Little BlogmocracyLiberal GuyMaggie's NotebookMELAMPUS'S MENAGERIE!!!!Miss Beth's Victory DanceMonkey in the MiddleMuslims Against ShariaMy Own ThoughtsNeoconstantNice DebNo ApologyNo Compromises When It Comes To Being Right!Noli insipientium iniurias pati Not A SheepOld SoldierPapa Mike's blogPart-Time PunditPolitical IslamPrincipally PoliticalProtest The ChurchProtest The LeftPublius' ForumRace, Politics, and Religion in the USARayra.netRedesigned Flight 93 memorial still an Islamo-fascist shrineRepublican Attack MachineRight on the RightRight TruthRon's MusingsRosemary's ThoughtsSad Old GothSarah Palin in Español Seattle ExpressSharia Finance WatchSheepdog BarkingShot in the DarkSmooth StoneSpace 4 Commerce by Brian DunbarStix BlogStop the ACLUTalk WisdomTeen Punditthe Avid EditorThe Conservative GuyThe GadflyThe Great Lie of IslamThe GridThe Hinge of FateThe Loyal EaglesThe Midnight SunThe MountainThe Paradigm ShiftThe Political OctagonThe Renaissance BiologistThe Sanity SentinelThe Sisyphus FilesThe Strata-Spherethe Truth of IslamThe View From the TurretThe Wide AwakesThunder RunTizona's WeblogTough Girl 101Traction ControlUnited ConservativesUsurper ExposedWar of 2 WorldsWe Have Some PlanesYes, but can I dance to it?

Best Blog Title: Cheney Outshines Obama

Gateway Pundit has the story on the dueling speeches we saw this morning between Obama and Cheney. Cheney Outshines Obama...Dear Leader Forgets Defense Chief's Name During Security Speech

The ole' teleprompter blog is gonna yell at B. Hussein! LOL!!!

But seriously, that faux pas - as well as the dozens that have come before it from Obama - ought to make everyone feel real safe!



How refreshing it was to FINALLY hear a voice of reason (again!) on National Security issues!! We miss you - Dick Cheney!! And we miss President Bush, too.

Hat Tips:

Gateway Pundit

Barack's Teleprompter blog

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

A Chilling Thought: Islam or Bilderberg

DefendUSx has a post up today where he replies to the comments of a reader. With all of the successful stalling that is currently going on re: The Obama COLB issue, it is looking more and more likely that there are very powerful forces - even more powerful than originally thought - behind the election of Barack Hussein Obama.

If you are unfamiliar with "The Bilderberg Group," you can do a web search and find plenty of information. Here are a few of my previous posts about the group:

Bilderbergers Devious Corporate-Globalist Scheme?

What's Going On Behind the Curtain.

When Hillary Clinton was literally (and, actually illegally) "thrown under the bus" during the Democratic primary, many of her followers and constituents rejected the call for "party unity" under Obama's nomination and they started a group called "PUMA's" (Party Unity My A**). Many voted for John McCain and Sarah Palin.

As a Hillary supporter, Philip J. Berg started investigating Obama and discovered that he is ineligible for POTUS because he is not a Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America. If Obama's father was Obama Sr., then Obama Jr. is a British Citizen under the British Nationality Act because Kenya was under that jurisdiction in 1961. The point is, no matter WHERE Obama was actually born - either Kenya or Hawaii, the fact that his father (if his biological father is, in fact, Obama Sr. - there are rumors that his real father could be either Malcolm X (Little) or Frank Marshall Davis) WAS NEVER NATURALIZED TO THE U.S. means that he was never an "immigrant" to the U.S. (as Diane Feinstein claimed at the inauguration) and therefore never a U.S. Citizen. Obama JR. cannot possibly be a Natural Born Citizen of the U.S. (as is required by our U.S. Constitution for POTUS). He can only be a dual citizen if he naturalized back to the U.S. after his Indonesian citizenship was renounced. Some think that he may even be an illegal alien! Or, as the Dems would put it "undocumented immigrant." That first descriptive term is what Feinstein conveniently left out of her description of Obama Sr. at the inauguration.

Things are heating up in the Birth Certificate controversy. Here come the Where's the Birth Certificate billboards!

Also, Mario Apuzzo's Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al Lawsuit can't be ignored forever.

Back to DefendUSx's post. Here it is in it's entirety:



My comments appear in blue below the reader's comments

I am just beginning to learn about Bilderberg - and the thought that comes to my mind after looking over the attendee list is this:

The one thing I noticed that gave me relief is that the closest thing to Islam represented there are two or three names from Turkey.

The Bilderberg group wants to include Islam in their plans for a One World Order, by having the Islamic countries subscribe to their world view and model of government. It will require some managed sharing and integration of cultures, they believe. You can see Britain is doing quite well with the new integration. The Group believes they must control the Islamic countries as a Trump card for Oil resources against China and Russia. It is why they chose Barack Hussein Obama, a Muslim with many deep ties to the Muslim world. The problem is, is that these arrogant idiots are too blind to see that Islam is working against their views, for their own World Order. An world order under Islam. I believe Obama is conducting two simultaneous agendas, one for the "Western Elite" who put him in power, and the other agenda for Islam.

I think that what will happen is that there are these two diametrically opposed forces bidding for complete global control and utter dominance.

Correct. I believe there are three dynamics (forces) at play for world domination. The "Western Elite" NWO, The Islamic NWO, and Chinese NWO models are all on a collision course with other with each passing day. I drew a diagram of these World Order agendas at work and the groups involved: See the diagram

One is secular (Bilderberg) and one is religious & fanatical (Islam). One is forward-thinking, one is backward in all it is and does. One wants to control the future, and one wants to obliterate the future (literally).


Bilderberg will have to devise a way to defeat or control Islam before it can contain & control the world. Islamic fanatics will ruin all of their hopes & dreams. Bilderberg's methods are to create and control chaos... if I understand it correctly.

Creating chaos is a means to increase control. The end justifies the means. For Islam, they have their man in office trying to avert, or claim the US for Islam, slowly but surely. Obama is in a very delicate position.

Hopefully it will not invite any Muslim leaders into its fold in order to accomplish this - even temporarily. Although that's what I would consider if I were them... but I bet that they have and have concluded that you could never trust Muslims. They would/will do to Bilderberg just what they do to everyone, everything else they touch: DESTROY.
I am sure Bilderberg is well aware of this - the fact that Islam is just as much a threat to them as they are to everyone else.

They are aware, but both camps are using "The pose as a friend, but be a spy" method. They will continue to use each other until one goes in for the kill.

I still am perplexed as to why they seem to be allowing the islamization of Europe, however... unless they think that Islam is a chaos they can control. (Good luck with that).

As stated before, they want cultural integration of Islam into their world views, but they do want to contain them and run the show. As you said, Muslims want to run this show.

We may end up with a choice of the lesser of two evils: Islam or Bilderberg.

Yes, but .. America is still here. If America continues to exist, both these groups are out of work

I am thinking, mulling, reflecting - and trying to learn fast.


Those of us who doubt Obama's citizenship status for POTUS have caught on to Obama & his cohorts in crime goal. The destruction of the United States as we know it. We are all trying learn fast.

I'm wondering - does this "Bilderberg Group" have something to do with the ACORN takeover that whistle blower Marcel Reid reported about on Glenn Beck's show? Hmmm.... There is a TON OF MONEY going in, and apparently being given out to hundreds of various groups from out of that funeral home location in New Orleans. Coordination of such a huge enterprise must have some powerful people behind it - even bigger and more powerful than the Soros group.

Here is my comment posted over at DefendUSx's blog:

Power + money = control. We are seeing this happening right before our very eyes! Those who think that Obama is some kind of secular "messiah" are drinking the proverbial Jim Jones cult Kool-Aid of this era. This is to their detriment.

Your post reminded me of a photo I saw on the Zombietime website. Tried to find it, but was unable to. It appeared during an anti-war, anti-Israel rally in San Francisco. A man dressed in pro-Palestinian type clothes and head scarf walked down the street with a sign that read:

"Thank you S.F. liberals. You die last."

According to the reporter on scene there, such a sign didn't even raise an eyebrow amongst the "anti-war, peace at any cost - including loss of freedom, everybody loves everyone" liberal left lunatics who would agree with Janet Napolitano's re-phrasing of the War on Terror as an "Overseas Contingency Operation."

When people refuse to recognize the obvious war going on between the West and Radical Islam, they become sheep for the future slaughter - just as that sign tells us.

Hat Tips:

RepubX blog

World Net Daily

P.S. As I glanced at Joel Rosenberg's headline today:


the thought came to me that both the Bilderberg group (made up of liberal-left progressives who hate Israel and Zionism and side with Islam re: the so-called "land for peace" delusion) and the Islamic group (who hate Israel, period) competing for "world domination" have one thing in common - their hatred for Israel and intentions to divide, conquer and destroy the apple of God's Eye. It all fits under the prophecies of the end times.

Another interesting post on the Bilderberg group:

Bilderberg Fears Losing Control in Chaos Plagued World


World Net Daily has a great reference tool via its complete archive of news reports on the Obama citizenship issue:

Is Obama constitutionally eligible to serve?
WND's complete archive of news reports on the issue


New post:

Video: Alex Jones Bilderberg Club's plan

Also read the additional articles in the right sidebar at the site.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Motives Behind Gay Activist Hate Against Christians

The intolerance of homosexual ACTIVISTS (NOTE: I'm NOT claiming that ALL homosexuals act this way); particularly against Christians and Mormons who voted for Proposition 8 in California has escalated to a whole new level.

The firestorm of hate, disparagement, cursing, ridicule, debasement, mocking, filthy language etc. that was hurled at Miss California, Carrie Prejean WAS UNCONSCIONABLE for a civil society. Yet, many of the loonie leftists (including the Lamestream Media of Mass Deception proponents like Olberdummy) jumped right on the bandwagon to hurl insults at a young, 21-year-old woman who simply answered a question WHEN ASKED HER HONEST OPINION during a beauty pageant.

Will you be next?

When you express your opinion on this particular hot-button issue, will YOU BE MERCILESSLY ATTACKED BY THESE RADICALS?

In the email (below) the following paragraph tells us what is REALLY at stake. It has far more nefarious repercussions than the battle over "same-sex" marriage. Note the statement I have highlighted in bold.

You’ll be shocked at the depth they’ve sunk to in their efforts. It has turned very, very ugly out there—especially after Arizona, California, and Florida voters enacted state constitutional marriage amendments, protecting biblical marriage, last November. The democratic process itself is under assault.

Just ask one woman who appeared at a rally as a "Yes On Prop. 8" supporter what was done to her! Better yet, if you have not seen it when it was recorded back in November 2008 - see for yourself through this well done ADF video:

Alliance Defense Fund email:

Pretense of Tolerance is Over

Christians are no longer free to disagree

The ACLU and its allies, are committed to push the mute button on those who disagree with them. Just how committed are they?

You’ll be shocked at the depth they’ve sunk to in their efforts. It has turned very, very ugly out there—especially after Arizona, California, and Florida voters enacted state constitutional marriage amendments, protecting biblical marriage, last November. The democratic process itself is under assault.

This is evidenced by the ACLU and its allies’ selective opposition to the democratic principle of free elections. It would prefer that courts force same-sex “marriage” on the nation. If you can’t beat them at the ballot box, go to court and sue them. Seriously! Just look at what the former head of the ACLU said after the people of Alaska overwhelmingly enacted a marriage amendment: “Today’s results prove that certain fundamental issues should not be left up to a majority vote.” So, no sooner did voters in California enact Proposition 8, the ACLU ran again to the court and demanded that it overturn the results of the state’s marriage amendment.

Many of you, those who believe in marriage as God intended – the union between one man and one woman, only – joined together in the fight to protect this important issue. Some gave money. For some Californians who gave $100 or more, they got the shock of their life.

Californians Against Hate took personal information from the secretary of state’s website about donors to California’s Proposition 8 campaign and posted it on a Google Internet map. As the Google map and personal information became known, retaliation followed against individuals that had donated money to restore marriage as the union between one man and one woman in the Golden State.

Personal property was vandalized.
Profanity was spray-painted on churches.
Businesses were hounded into firing employees who had donated to Prop. 8.
Death threats were sent to Prop. 8 supporters.
White powder was mailed to make recipients fear that they had come into contact with the deadly substance anthrax.
Do these outrageous actions resemble anything even remotely close to “tolerance”?

No, these shameless acts are the last resort of people who have taken off the gloves of “tolerance” for the express purpose of coercing opponents into surrender. The ACLU and its allies cannot tolerate a truly fair democratic process, so instead they seek advantage by intimidating and punishing citizens that disagree with their agenda.

Christians are treated harshly for living out their faith. One organization alone—the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF)—is positioned to provide effective, winning legal protection for the Body of Christ.

ADF and our allied attorneys are intervening in these and other cases to seek relief for the victims of intolerance, to protect their freedom to disagree. We’re applying our unique tried-and-true system of training attorneys, forming strategy, funding cases, and litigating. Using this pattern, we’ve won more than 3 out of every 4 cases litigated to completion. By the grace of God, ADF aims to continue our legacy as a one-of-a-kind legal organization that WINS.

The Body of Christ deserves nothing less in these alarming times. Stand with ADF through your prayers and financial gifts today.

[end of email]


Conservative Christians have been sounding the alarm bells for years against the radical homosexual agenda going on across our nation. The ACLU and the courts in other states didn't waste any time FORCING RULINGS AND/OR LEGISLATION in their states to get "same-sex marriage" legalized. They learned (via CA Prop. 8 results) that if they leave it up to the public vote (which is the way it SHOULD be done in each state), the gay marriage initiatives LOSE EVERY TIME. Even in a state as LIBERAL as California - voters came out in droves to proclaim what the definition and institution of marriage has been for thousands of years - the union of one man and one woman.

If Prop. 8 HAD NOT PASSED - then "same-sex marriage" would have been legalized and written into the state constitution! Could you imagine what would have happened to Carrie Prejean if that was the case? She may have been handcuffed and carted off to jail for a "speech hate crime" against "homosexuals" because she didn't express the "politically correct" answer to the question she was given!

Do you think that scenario is unlikely? In Massachusetts - the gay activists have the attitude, "it's legal now - you can't oppose us anymore." A man who wanted to be notified when homosexual indoctrination was going on in his son's kindergarten class (so he could take him out of the class to avoid such lessons) was handcuffed and taken to jail for "trespassing" and refusing to leave until he got his answer from the principal of the school (who - obviously refused to do as he asked).

The truth of the matter is that homosexual activists will NEVER be satisfied until Christians (and/or any religious persons who disagree with them) are COMPLETELY SILENCED. What's more, they will work the courts through "hate crimes" legislation to shut anyone up who holds to the biblical, God ordained mandate and definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman.

I certainly applaud the woman in the video who stood up for her free speech rights, her religious freedom rights, her freedom of association rights, and her courage to face such rabid, hate-filled hard-core radicals like those who were in the video.