Tuesday, April 13, 2010

What If Pres. Bush Did This?


I have a question for my liberal blogging friends who occasionally choose to comment here at Talk Wisdom. Please read the following post from American Thinker, and then answer me what would have happened if President George W. Bush (or any other Republican president) did such a stunt?

Obama Attends Non-Existent Soccer Game?
posted by null at American Thinker - 11 hours ago
We are told that President Obama broke tradition and ditched the presidential press pool over the weekend to watch one of his daughter's soccer games. But the story has several problems.


Recall that my previous post shared links that brought up Obama's mysterious actions which were initially explained away by a spokesperson as "Obama attending one of his daughter's soccer games."

The American Thinker commenter's have been speculating about Obama's 41 minute disappearance without the press. Apparently, it has also been reported that the Secret Service didn't accompany him either! Don't you find that very odd???

Some of the speculations regarding his whereabouts included:

1. The daughter's soccer game (now know to have been non-existent).
2. He went to buy drugs.
3. He may have been involved with giving secrets to Russia.
4. It was a ruse to get people (especially the press) away from the White House for some nefarious purpose. Who was let in at that time? I know. People will say that there are logs taken for everyone who enters the White House. What makes anyone think that this lying, cheating, unconstitutional, fraudulent, America-destroying usurper would follow any "White House rules?" He doesn't even follow the United States Constitution!!
5. He had a gay sex tryst. (After all, isn't Michelle out of the country in Haiti?)
6. He went to smoke some crack.

Better yet, let me share some of the comments:

Posted by: gordo
Apr 13, 12:27 AM

Maybe he went to meet his pusher? George Soros? Vladimir Putin? Bill Ayers? The one thing I know for sure is that the MSM isn't going to tell us a thing.

*******

Posted by: Emudude
Apr 13, 12:53 AM

It is believed that he went to the Kenyan Embassy to stop the Kenyan Parliament Minutes of March 25, 2010 from being released or at least have it pulled by the Embassy People there. Page 31 of the Document states that he was Born in Kenya and that he is not a Native American. This Document is all over the web now.

*******

Posted by: Bryan
Apr 13, 01:09 AM

And today Andy Stern resigns. Coincidence?

*******

ted by: VHG
Apr 13, 02:14 AM

What better courier for state secrets to the Russians than an unaccompanied Obama? Wonder how much he got for whatever it is he sold us down the river for? But the ego this person has really has begin to show itself as an ugly attachment and what he thinks of the United States and his duty to the country. Pressure the media to find out more. Keep asking the WaPo, NY Times, and the rest of the fawning media lapdogs to dig! Maybe Tina Fey can do an Obama parody?

*******

Posted by: xiphos
Apr 13, 02:47 AM

Obama didn't have to leave Our White House to get to a High Crime area. [Now THAT comment would be funny, if this subject wasn't so serious!]

*******

Posted by: airedaletwo
Apr 13, 03:26 AM

I just checked Sidwell's website in the Athletics section. The only athletic events listed for Saturday 4/10/2010 are:

Apr 10
Crew - Club (Girls) - Baltimore Invitational at Glass Beach
Track & Field - Boys Varsity - Woodward Relays
Time: 8:30am
Track & Field - Girls Varsity - Woodward Relays
Time: 8:30am
Baseball - Varsity at Bullis
Time: 1:30pm
Baseball - Varsity at Bullis

Not one soccer game. If you check the soccer schedule it's all in the fall that goes for Varsity through Girls 7-8B

*******

Posted by: rudy c.
Apr 13, 07:37 AM

Every thing about this guy, Barry Soetoro, is suspect. Everything he does and says is just down right creepy. Just to look at him with that smirk on his face. If you look closely enough at his eyes you can see evil and the eyes say, almost out loud, "I'm lying and I really want to hurt you". That's what my gut instinct tells me about O'Barry. He's always sneaking around and you can't believe anything he says. I mean, what can you expect from a guy who's first executive order is to seal his birth certificate and school records? What kind of person would do something like that? Someone with something to hide? That would be my guess.

*******

Posted by: JanevonMises
Apr 13, 07:45 AM

He ditches the press lackeys and Lady M, and goes away for about 41 minutes. No soccer game is scheduled, the field is abandoned, the press is told to turn around. Sounds like he had to meet his connection alright. Maybe a little storm blew in from Bolivia, maybe a little local "agriculture".

BTW, you are not allowed to smoke TOBACCO in the White House. Rules don't say anything about anything else.

Where were his kids?

*******

Posted by: amerigal1
Apr 13, 07:55 AM

We have every reason in the world to suspect something foul when Obama disappears like this. It's not the first time. Obviously he didn't want the press corps following and photographing him. Since there was no verifiable "soccer game," his leaving the WH like that is provocative. He's hidden his documents and most of his history. He doesn't care about the process of how things get done......he said so himself. What was he "getting done" this time?

*******
Posted by: swim-r-sink
Apr 13, 07:59 AM

Well, he sent the media on a goose chase, that's a fact! But the touching story of just wanting to see his daughter at the game with out all those creepy media people hanging about! This is new the Sympathy Card excuse!! Obummer can sure shovel out the B.S.!!

********

Posted by: stormywthr
Apr 13, 08:10 AM

Since Emudude has brought up the topic, I would add that if Obama has found a place to hide he better keep it a secret, he may want to return there.
The Hansard reports that “Obama born in Kenya”. (March 25, 2010, page 31.) [www.bunge.go.ke]
In fact this record of the Kenya Parliament has revealed much about the great love and devotion that the Kenyan people have for their “son of Kenya”. The records of November 5, 2008 and March 25, 2010 alone are evidence enough suggesting that Obama has a great connection with the African country. [www.bunge.go.ke] And should not the question be asked, will the Kenya government ask to see and examine Obama’s long form birth certificate now under seal?

*******

Posted by: Ender
Apr 13, 08:39 AM

Other problems: The wife doesn't go to the games? Which daughter?

They couldn't even decide on which kid to use as a cover story.

He does whatever he wants regardless of the Constitution or the People.

********

Posted by: sccdc08
Apr 13, 09:46 AM

I think we are being led down a rabbit hole. This administration is very good at creating red herrings. What ever happened during that time, we would need to look at something bigger than just where the president was, and why the press corps was lured away, and why none of the players seem interested in truth. The commentators who mention that the heads of several important nations were in town, and that Poland's highest officials had just died, are most likely onto something. If this is indeed a nice neighborhood, rather than a bad one, I think that hints at a secret meeting, rather than a drug run. But it could have been both. Imagine how much blackmail power a foreign country could have in the white house is they were the supplier for POTUS. But life isn't a Tom Clancy novel. Beware the red herring.

*******

Posted by: Constitution First
Apr 13, 09:56 AM

Lies, Misinformation, Lap-Dog Media Compliance?

Normal Day.

*******

Posted by: Danae
Apr 13, 09:57 AM

So..... Who did the President spend his time with? In what way will it effect our National security.

Where is the "Transparent" government that came with the "Hope and Change" promise? Oh right, we are still hoping for change. Meanwhile, in other news, Code Pink leader Jodie Evans meets with White House officials and then Taliban members in Afghanistan.... Oh yea, now there is some change for ya, being a traitor is now officially sanctioned, business as usual in the Obama White House. This "presidency" will go down into history as an obamanation, equal to an Abomination.

*******

Posted by: Stan G.
Apr 13, 10:12 AM

There is a weird, odd, strange, other worldly, phony, mysterious, nefarious, evil side to this guy. How in the heck he ever got elected without knowing any more about him than we do is a mystery in to and of itself. It may come out someday, but as often is the case, there is much more to this than has been reported. The whole thing just simply cannot be explained away by fatuous love displayed by the media.

*******

Posted by: Roxanna
Apr 13, 10:33 AM

I doubt if we'll ever learn the truth about where he went. We certainly will not be able to believe anything we're told, either by anyone on his staff or the MSM.

*******

Posted by: Rontenw
Apr 13, 10:34 AM

"He had a meeting that he did not want published"?
Come on! He could have found a better story than the soccer games scam for that, or no story at all. Why not say, the President is busy now - with no further explanation? Or that he is studying a CIA intel document that cannot be discussed?
The only plausible reason for using the soccer story is to get rid of the press for awhile, but why that?

*******

Posted by: ahem
Apr 13, 10:38 AM

f-stop is right: He met someone at the WH--that's or he skipped out to meet with his Soviet handlers.

*******

Posted by: H Hazell
Apr 13, 10:41 AM

f-stop may have it pegged! Is there any verification that the President actually left the WH? If none, then the issue does seem to be not where he went, but who visited.

*******

Posted by: Siridh
Apr 13, 11:32 AM

Its disgusting that the MSM has done nothing to vet Obama or to keep him honest. A President doesn't have the right to sneak away for 40 minutes -- it might suck, but its the way it is. For the media to ignore this borders on treason. I don't care how innocent the 40-minute mission was, he's the president and he is accountable to the U.S. for every minute of his time. F-stop that sounds very plausible. It also sounds plausible that he met someone secretly. That part of Pennsylvania Avenue and immediately surrounding is not a bad neighborhood BTW. I don't trust this guy one bit and its things like this that make it worse.

*******

I agree with what the author at American Thinker wrote in the first paragraph:

It is rather disturbing when you dissect it.


Hat Tip:

American Thinker

Monday, April 12, 2010

Jesus: "For there is nothing hidden which will not be revealed"


I don't need to write a post today. The most important information of the day is being revealed on several blogs. I recommend reading Mario Apuzzo's blog - A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers: Current Minister of Kenyan Government Declares Obama Was Born In Kenya and Is Not a “native American”

Read all of the comments, too.

The following one deserves to be highlighted:

medical said...
One or more very reliable source(s) in or around Washington advise they heard "through the grapevine" that the Usurper spent time without the press while he was "taking care of some sort of urgent personal business on or near 'R Street' in Washington, only a mile or two from the White House. 'They' claim he has recently become extremely irritable and he is experiencing severe mood swings. No one wants to come near him unless they're forced to.". He MAY have attended a soccer game before or after the meeting (no one would say for sure), but the "soccer game" appears to be nothing more than a cover story. The source(s) vehemently refused to provide more specific information ("NO, SIR!"), except to speculate that the Usurper's multiple substance abuse issues seem to have reached a critical point and 'they' do not believe he will be capable of performing his duties much longer... WHOA, DID I JUST LOCATE HIS MEETING PLACE?! At this moment, I'm viewing a map of "R Street, N.W." and the KENYA EMBASSY is located at 2249 R Street, N.W., near the intersection of Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.! Was the "urgent personal business" a face to face plea for Kenya's silence? Hmmmmmm...

April 11, 2010 9:33 PM


More blogs reporting on this stunning information:

Lame Cherry: Paging Kenyan Born Barack Hussein Obama Jr.


Kenya Parliament, Obama born in Kenya, Obama not native American, Kenya National Assemby, Official Report, March 25, 2010
posted by citizenwells at Citizen WElls - 16 hours ago
Kenya Parliament, Obama born in Kenya This apparently is legitimate. NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OFFICIAL REPORT Thursday, 25 th March, 2010 “The other thing that we are addressing through devolution is excl...

Kenya Claims Obama
posted by evil@evilconservativeonline.com (Evil Conservative) at Evil Conservative Radio - 17 hours ago
I've posted on all this stuff before, and the questions surrounding Barack Obama's eligibility aren't going away. In fact, the rumblings just continue unabated with each new trickle. Now it seems at this p...


There are several blogs reporting the following, too:

Daily Thought Pad: French Leader Sarkozy Slams Obama, Warns He Might Be Insane.

Sarkozy "Appalled" by "Insane" Obama
posted by evil@evilconservativeonline.com (Evil Conservative) at Evil Conservative Radio - 17 hours ago
I've been wondering how the rest of the world, sans our constitutional viewpoint, views Obama. Now at least we know how French President Sarkozy sees him. While our media still touts him as brilliant, arti...

NO KIDDING!! Only an insane (or, a very evil person) would heap so much terrible damage upon our nation, our economy, our defenses, and the American people in the way that ObaMAO and his radical cohorts have!

Michael Savage was right - LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISORDER!!!

Jesus Christ is ALWAYS right:

Mat 10:26 Therefore do not fear them. For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known.

Mar 4:22 For there is nothing hidden which will not be revealed, nor has anything been kept secret but that it should come to light.

Luk 8:17 For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor [anything] hidden that will not be known and come to light.

Luk 12:2 For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, nor hidden that will not be known.

Jhn 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.


Perhaps this was God's plan all along. This person, known as Barack Hussein Obama (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro) will undo himself!

Keep praying, people! Perhaps this abominable national nightmare know as Obama might be over sooner rather than later.

Hat Tips:

Mario Apuzzo's blog - A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers

Daily Thought Pad

Saturday, April 10, 2010

Update on Kerchner vs. Obama & Congress Case

Listen to the following YouTube video to find out why the Kerchner vs. Obama & Congress lawsuit is different from the rest of the lawsuits (many of which were previously dismissed by a legal maneuver called "lack of standing").

Charles Kerchner, Attorney Mario Apuzzo interview 4/7/2010 on the Dr. Kate Revolution Show.

YouTube Video Link: Kerchner v Obama lawsuit update, Kerchner Apuzzo radio interview

Kerchner v Obama and Congress, Update, April 10, 2010, ARGUMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT

From Charles Kerchner, lead plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama and Congress.

“For Immediate Release – 09 April 2010

Atty Mario Apuzzo Files His ‘ARGUMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT’ to the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Preparation for the Hearing and Argument of the Kerchner v Obama & Congress Appeal Scheduled to be Heard on 29 Jun 2010.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/29687263/

Charles Kerchner
Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner v Obama & Congress
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/kerchner-v-obama-appeal-atty-apuzzo.html
http://www.protectourliberty.org/

Hat Tip:

Citizen Wells and all links above.

Friday, April 09, 2010

Those Crazy Birthers...

In an effort to educate some people on Facebook who tend to pooh-pooh the concerns of millions of Americans who want to know whether or not Barack Hussein Obama is a natural born citizen and thus eligible to be president, I ended up battling a person named "Floyd Debarber."

Since some readers here may not have access to Facebook, here is a copy of the post and comment thread:


Christine - I have created a website/blog list of sites (in the right sidebar) that cover the Obama/Soetoro ineligibility for POTUS question. It can be a great resource when you need to counter those who think that Obama's ineligibility for POTUS is a frivolous complaint. You can also see several websites that explain Why Natural... Born Citizen for POTUS Matters!

http://talkwisdom.blogspot.com/2010/04/fyi-new-list-at-talk-wisdom.html


Yesterday at 8:08am

*******
David Havard JBFC, you're dumb. He's an American citizen, it's been proven time and time again. GIVE IT UP.
Yesterday at 8:12am

*******

Kristina McMichael Treon - david prove it to me, right here...show me the proof
Yesterday at 8:13am

*******

David Havard http://aroundthesphere.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/obama-birth-certificate1.jpg
Yesterday at 8:15am

*******

Floyd Debarber David -They will believe this until their dying day. No amount of proof will be enough to satisfy them.
Yesterday at 8:17am

*******

Stephanie Fredricks You've got people saying it's real, you've got people saying it's fake. Why?
Yesterday at 8:19am

*******

Kristina McMichael Treon you do realize, anyone can make up anything on this computer.....all i saw was a form. nothing related to the government or remotely related....this could be all made up.
Yesterday at 8:19am

*******

Christine - THE RELEVANT OBAMA ADMISSION
At Barack Obama’s web site, the following admission:

“FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship
... See More
‘When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…’ “

Read that last line again.

“That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…”

That’s an admission that Great Britain “governed the status” of Barack Obama, Jr. He has chosen to highlight this on his own volition.

And this leads to the relevant question:

HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN’S STATUS BE “GOVERNED” BY GREAT BRITAIN?

A natural born citizen’s status should only be governed by the United States.

Hat Tip: Natural Born Citizen blog

Yesterday at 8:19am

*******

Floyd Debarber - As the son of a Kenyan, Obama had dual citizenship (US and UK Colonial, later Kenyan) until he became an adult, at which time he forfeited his Kenyan citizen status.
Yesterday at 8:22am

*******

Amber Cahill - Wow....that BC doesn't look fake or anything. Completely different than any other birth certificate that I have seen - but David and Floyd believe it's real so it must be real right?
Yesterday at 8:24am

*******

Christine - United States Constitution - Article II Section 1 clause 5:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Exactly what is a Natural Born Citizen?
... See More
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEnaAZrYqQI

Yesterday at 8:27am

*******

David Havard - If you go and get a copy of your birth certificate they all look like that. Only retarded people believe that he is not a citizen of the United States. It's as simple as that, either you're a retard or you're not.
Yesterday at 8:27am

*******

Stephanie Fredricks Floyd,- I have a child who also had dual citizenship. She is ineligible to become POTUS.
Yesterday at 8:28am

*******

Christine - David - please read and learn. There is a difference between a citizen vs. a natural born citizen. NBC is required to be eligible for POTUS.
Yesterday at 8:29am · Christine Watson Watch this video. It explains it very clearly:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEnaAZrYqQI
Yesterday at 8:30am

*******

Amber Cahill - David - I have a copy of my birth certificate, and my husbands, and my children's - they don't look a THING like that - and contain a lot more information.....which that one should contain and doesn't. And simply because I do not believe he is american born does not make me, or anyone else a retard - you are an ass.
Yesterday at 8:31am

*******

Kristina McMichael Treon - i dont care what or who obummer is...i just know he could careLESS about the american ppl...he is not good for this country at alll. look at all the states sueing over this healthcare crap
Yesterday at 8:31am

*******

David Havard - Amber, exactly how much more information does your BC hold? Please site specific examples on how yours is different than OUR Presidents.
Yesterday at 8:37am

*******

Kristina McMichael Treon - mine is different....have you looked at yours lately?
Yesterday at 8:40am

*******

Christine - David - the B.C. doesn't really matter (unless Obama/Soetoro isn't the biological son of Obama Sr.) because his father was never a U.S. Citizen! Therefore, Obama Jr. cannot be a natural born citizen which requires 2 U.S. Citizen parents.
Yesterday at 8:45am

*******

David Havard - Yes, I had to go get a copy of mine when I applied for my Passport. I'd post mine but it's at home in a lock box. Could it be that each state has different birth certificates?? OMG, no wai?!?!?
Yesterday at 8:45am

*******

Amber Cahill - While it's not right in front of me - off the top of my head it contains the name of the hospital, how many siblings were in the home, names of county/state officials, residential address....maybe the name of the doctor....can't remember all the differences right now - but there are a lot more - that I will be happy to rattle off to you tomorrow.
Yesterday at 8:52am

*******

David Havard - Read about half way down, there are two different BC. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birth_certificate
Yesterday at 8:54am

*******

Amber Cahill - Well, the one I had to use to get my passport, or even go on a cruise, has to be the official raised print on the colored paper with the seal and certificate kind....if he's got one of those - I would like to see it - the one posted above isn't even certified.
Yesterday at 8:58am

*******

Floyd Debarber Stephanie - Of course she is ineligible - she is a chils!

Seriously - are you cetain she is ineligible or only inelegible until she drops the non-US citizenship?

Christine - A natural born citizen requires NO US citizen parents. If you are born in the US, you are a citizen by birth regardless of the nationality of your parents.... See More

Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States at birth:"

•Anyone born inside the United States *
•Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
•Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
•Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
•Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
•Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
•Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
•A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
* There is an exception in the law — the person must be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.

Yesterday at 9:02am

*******

David Havard - I can't do this anymore, some of you people are f**king hopeless. Dear lord, if I ever post on this retarded page again please kill me.
Yesterday at 9:03am

*******

Kristina McMichael Treon - i still don't think even if it is his BC, it would make him a better president........he is bad for america
Yesterday at 9:04am

*******

Floyd Debarber - Dacid -LOL. I hear you. Go bang your head against the wall for a couple hours. It will be just as rewarding as arguing with the birthers.
Yesterday at 9:05am

*******

Kristina McMichael Treon - yes, please dont try to change my mind about obummer b/c its a lost cause.......i have made my mind up unless he starts really careing about our constitution and the ppl
Yesterday at 9:09am

*******

Kristina McMichael Treon - caring
Yesterday at 9:10am

*******

Stephanie Fredricks Floyd, - she's 19 and hasn't reached the proper "age" yet. She is a child, born on foreign soil, to a 17 year old US citizen mother and a British citizen father. I have a consular report of live birth abroad as well as an English birth certificate. She had dual citizenship until the age of 18. She is ineligible based on her birth "stats", if you ... See Morewill.

She's also the victim of an internation parental kidnapping, and it hurts me deeply, so I'll not continue this discussion. Sorry. I shouldn't have brought it up, but it's sort of similar, no? :(
Yesterday at 9:11am

*******

Amber Cahill - And you know the short form "image" used in that Wikipedia article was created by the illustrator....
Yesterday at 9:12am

*******

Floyd Debarber Stephanie - Sorry to open a wound.
Yesterday at 9:16am

*******

Christine - Floyd - you need to educate yourself before you make bold faced lies like that! Go to this site, read and LEARN!

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
Yesterday at 9:17am

*******

Stephanie Fredricks - You didn't, I did. It's all good, chief. :)
Yesterday at 9:17am

*******

Floyd Debarber - Christine - What did I lie about?
Yesterday at 9:18am

*******

Christine - There is a difference between a natural born citizen vs. a citizen. Please read this:
http://www.newmediajournal.us/staff/fsalvato/2008/12032008.htm
Yesterday at 9:21am

*******

Floyd Debarber - Christine - I realize the presidnet has to be a natural born citizen. naturalized citizens are NOT eligible to be president. I still don't know what you think I lied about.
Yesterday at 9:24am

*******

Christine - Floyd - You wrote: "A natural born citizen requires NO US citizen parents. If you are born in the US, you are a citizen by birth regardless of the nationality of your parents.... "

That is not true!

Yesterday at 9:56am

*******

Floyd Debarber - So I oversimplified a bit.

The Supreme Court has never explicitly ruled on whether children born in the United States to illegal immigrant parents are entitled to birthright citizenship via the 14th Amendment, although it has generally been assumed that they are. A birth certificate issued by a U.S. state or territorial government is evidence of citizenship, and is usually accepted as proof of citizenship.

In the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), the Supreme Court ruled that a person becomes a citizen of the United States at the time of birth, by virtue of the first clause of the 14th amendment of the Constitution, if that person is:... See More

Born in the United States
Has parents that are subjects of a foreign power, but not in any diplomatic or official capacity of that foreign power
Has parents that have permanent domicile and residence in the United States
Has parents that are in the United States for business
Yesterday at 10:00am

*******

Christine - Floyd wrote: "So I oversimplified a bit."

Yep...spoken like a true blue ObaMAO Bot! LOL

Yesterday at 10:16am

*******

Floyd Debarber - Do you agree that you can be a natural-born citizen without having any US citizen parents?

Did I lie?
Yesterday at 10:20am

*******

Christine - No. I don't agree. Please see what the lawyer whose case is still pending against Obama in the Third Circuit Court has to say:

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
Yesterday at 10:24am

*******

Floyd Debarber - Not agreeing with me and the US Supreme Court is significantly different than me lying to you. And sinc ethis case has not yet been diecide, It in no way changes the applicability of the 14th amendment regaarding the definition of a natural-born citizen.

*******

End of postings

*******

The conversation in that thread clearly illustrates the confusion that many Americans have regarding natural born citizen status (which is required for POTUS in the United States Constitution - Article II Section 1 Clause 5) vs. U.S. citizen or naturalized citizen status.

Interestingly enough, WorldNetDaily has some screen shots of articles that were previously available for reading; but now, the words "Kenyan-born" for Obama have since been scrubbed from the original sites.

Isn't that odd?

Doesn't it make you think that Obama was previously described as "Kenyan-born," but now that he ran for president and fraudulently occupies the White House, the evidence of that fact is continually being scrubbed?

I wonder how many archived articles also carry additional damning evidence about his place of birth!

When you visit the article at WorldNetDaily, you will also see the now infamous video of Michele Obama stating that Kenya is her husband's "home country."

How much more evidence is needed that Obama is hiding his COLB because if it was made public, people would see that he was born in Kenya and therefore has, and always will be, ineligible for POTUS? He is the usurper in chief, who is ruining our nation, our economy, our health care system, our financial system, our sovereignty, our protections, our national security policies, our foreign policies, our friendship with Israel, and much much more! It is so obvious that he is trying to create a Marxist gangster government against the will of WE THE PEOPLE!

My question: When can we call this treason???

Hat Tip:

WorldNetDaily

Thursday, April 08, 2010

President Appeaser's Playground Mentality


Correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't seem to recall President George W. Bush lashing out against critics in the media. The Media of Mass Deception constantly disparaged, insulted, ridiculed, debased, and lied about President Bush and his policies practically every day while he was in office. President Bush was the type of man who ignored the vitriol against him and did his job as Commander in Chief. He kept us safe for seven years after the 9/11 attacks.

Obama? Not so much. We have already had four attacks (one was thankfully thwarted - the Christmas Day pantywaist bomber) here on U.S. soil, and with Obama's naive foreign policy, he's rolling out the red (how apropos for the Marxist!!) carpet; encouraging rogue nations to attack us because "we won't retaliate with nuclear weapons."

What kind of fool tells the enemy the strategy we have planned to keep this nation safe? Answer: NONE!! Even a fool knows not to show his hand in such a way. This clown Resident of the White House and his loony commie advisers are placing America in grave danger. It's like having middle school level children running the country. And, when someone like Sarah Palin legitimately criticizes their stupid policies, the bogus POTUS answers back like a dumb-ass nincompoop!

Despite the seriousness of the nuclear appeasement mistke by ObaMAO, it's comic relief to read Gateway Pundit's post:

It’s On… President Appeaser Lashes Out at Sarah Palin

The comments are hilarious, too! These are some of my favorites:

AuntieMadder
April 8th, 2010 6:53 pm #2
Snippy little b!tch today, wasn’t he? Must have been way past time for a nicotene fix.

*******

bill-tb
April 8th, 2010 6:53 pm #3
She does appear to be a tad bit smarter than you, sir.

*******

Chisum
April 8th, 2010 6:54 pm #4
Oh boy, The Won must be feeling a bit threatened by Sarah.

I guess it’s because she’s so dumb. And he’s so freakin’ brilliant.

Just ask him.

*******

MAJ Mike
April 8th, 2010 6:55 pm #5
Exactly what makes THE WON any more of a nuclear warfare expert than Ms. Palin?

Hell, the Nuclear Weapons Targeting Courses I took for the Infantry Officer Advanced Course, Field Artillery Officer Advanced Course, and the Command and General Staff Officers College make me a more highly trained Atomic Weaponeer than THE WON.

*******


exceller
April 8th, 2010 7:12 pm #13
This week alone should leave no doubt in anyones mind that our president is a madman.
Three mindless, nonsensical and dangerous acts.
- Removing “Islam” from the foreign policy publications.
- The retarded change in our nuclear stance.
- The empty treaty with Russia on Nukes.

All three of these actions weaken America’s standing in the world.

*******

jetstream
April 8th, 2010 7:16 pm #14
As usual, the strawman argument is put forth to deflect from the true issue.

Strawman: expertise/knowledge of nuclear issues

True Issue: defense strategy

*******

Dipso Facto
April 8th, 2010 7:18 pm #19
Boy, this really makes Obama look petty and whiny.

The president of the United States saying, “The last time I checked” like a teenage girl.

What a dope. His mouth is his own worst enemy.

*******

OverTheCoastline
April 8th, 2010 7:18 pm #20
Bad move, Mr. President. Calling out Sarah Palin – - much like your attempts to lash out at Rush Limbaugh and Fox News – - only makes you look foolish, unfocused and floundering.

*******

Deana
April 8th, 2010 7:19 pm #21
I see others have had the same thought I do: After the news that has come out over the past couple of days, no one in their right mind would ever accuse Obama of being an expert on nuclear issues.

This man is so . . . strange. What is it about him that he constantly has to pick on people by name? I’m sure ever president has felt like responding directly to critics but I simply cannot recall any other president EVER picking people out by name and being harsh in his response to them.



Yep!!

Added a bit late, but this one is just too funny not to include!

zefal April 8th, 2010 8:34 pm #81
He plans on defending each one of the 57 states by placing joe biden look-a-like scarecrows in each one. If that doesn’t work he’ll go nuclear and place nancy pelosi scarecrows. Last resort: thermonuclear with barney frank ones.




Ha!!

Hat Tip:

Gateway Pundit

FYI - New List at Talk Wisdom


I have created a website/blog list of sites (in the right sidebar) that cover the Obama/Soetoro ineligibility for POTUS question. It can be a great resource when you need to counter those who think that Obama's ineligibility for POTUS is a frivolous complaint. The sites are listed in alphabetical order.


If you know of any additional sites that belong on this list, please share a link in the comment section and I will add it on.

Obama POTUS Ineligibility Websites:



*******


In addition, I would like to call every one's attention to a sidebar listing that I had previously created which shares exactly why this issue is of utmost importance.


Why Natural Born Citizen for POTUS Matters:



YouTube Video Link: Exactly What IS A Natural Born Citizen?

Additional articles to read:


BORN IN THE USA?
WorldNetDaily Exclusive
Officer to Obama: Burden of proof must rest with you
Flight surgeon refusing orders releases text of challenge to president--WND

WorldNetDaily Exclusive
3rd Circuit picks June 29 for eligibility case
Argument alleges Obama probably not even American citizen--WND

WorldNetDaily Exclusive
Officer questioning eligibility faces new threats from Army
'You could be sentenced to dismissal, confinement'--WND

THE FULL STORY
WorldNetDaily ExclusiveIs Obama constitutionally eligible to serve?
WND's complete archive of news reports on the issue--WND

WorldNetDaily Exclusive
New strategy unveiled to force Obama on eligibility
Petition calls on state election officials to verify qualifications in 2012--WND

*******
Interesting Letters to the Editor at WorldNetDaily:


Thursday April 08, 2010

Calling the pretender's bluff

I am loving this! ["Officer questioning eligibility faces new threats from Army"]
If Lakin is court-martialed, he gets discovery and should be able to demand proof of Obama's eligibility. If he is not court-martialed, that fact alone lends great weight to the suspicion that Obama is not constitutionally qualified to be president.

Lakin is calling the "great" pretender/pathological liar's bluff!

I flat out do not believe that Obama is legit. If that proves out, that he is not legit, I hope he spends the rest of his life in federal prison.

Way to go, Terry Lakin. Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Jake

*******


Wednesday April 07, 2010

Joint Chiefs are responsible

The case of Lt. Col. Lakin begs a question that is becoming ever more disturbing over time: Why, exactly, have our military leaders, specifically the Joint Chiefs, failed to force the "Impostor in Chief" to substantiate that he is a "natural born citizen"?

Ultimately, it is not Lt. Col. Lakin who is responsible for insuring that the U.S. military as a whole is following legal orders. It is the responsibility of the Joint Chiefs, each of whom, just as Lt. Col. Lakin, took an oath to uphold the Constitution. The U.S. armed forces place men and women in battle, kill enemy soldiers under presidential orders and would release weapons of mass destruction under those same orders.

We Americans need to begin asking ourselves whether it is only Barry Soetero we need to worry about. We give our military leaders incredible power, and yet they seem to have abdicated the responsibility of insuring that power is used lawfully. Indeed, their silence may be enabling and furthering a terrible fraud against the American people.

If Soetero is ever found to be a usurper, not only should he go – and be tried, punished and made an example of, by the way – but so should the Joint Chiefs who have abjectly failed in their duty to protect the United States of America from ALL ENEMIES, both foreign and domestic. And we must create safeguards to insure that no one who does not hold ultimate loyalty to the Constitution of the United States ever holds any of these positions again.

God bless America.

Dale Howell

*******


Determining truth via polls?

As a longtime WND reader, I was once again offended by Glenn Beck's latest extended rail against the "nut jobs" who want to see proof that our commander in chief is constitutionally eligible to be the president. This latest rail against the "birthers" was on his radio show this week.

He again equated "birthers" to those that say "Bush blew up the World Trade Center" and the "moon landing people." The phrase "nut jobs" was repeated more than once.

In his latest "words of wisdom" on the issue, he said that the truth comes though majority consensus, and he used recent poll results to prove it. Since when does Beck, on any other issue, believe that the majority opinion defines the truth? He does with this issue!

Beck is doing serious damage to the effort of people who only want to find out the truth on the issue. If you listened to his latest "speeches" on the eligibility issue, he is trying to make people believe that if they want answers on this issue, they are labeling themselves as "nut jobs," and they are losing credibility on all other issues.

Glenn's saying a lot of good things about a lot of other issues, but he's losing credibility (in my book) by taking an irrational and inconsistent stand on this issue. WND needs to contact Glenn behind the scenes and educate him on this issue. And if you have and he is ignoring the information, and arrogantly increasing and intensifying his attacks on those questioning the prez's eligibility, then maybe it's time Glenn gets a little negative press from the conservative news sources.

Bob

*******
The Army's 'presumption'

In Bob Unruh's article "Officer questioning eligibility faces new threats from Army," he quotes from an Army "counseling form" issued to Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, which reads in part, "… deployment orders are presumed to be valid and lawful ..." Presumed to be valid and lawful?

According to Princeton's WordNet, "presumed" is defined as meaning to "accept without verification or proof." If Obama's eligibility had been proven, there would be no need to "presume" that the colonels orders are lawful. It seems that the Army has very carefully chosen its words – or perhaps had its words chosen for them – to avoid making any direct (and therefor challengeable) assertion that the orders are fully lawful based on proven eligibility of Barack Obama. Instead, by "presuming" that the orders are valid and lawful, the Army is attempting to relieve themselves of any responsibility to prove the legality of the order and instead shift the burden of proof to Col. Lakin. Hopefully, Lakin can get the case in front of a judge who will require the Army to prove the validity and legality of the orders.

Leslie D. Martin

*******

That's using your noggin

Great idea Joseph Farah has about the states refusing to put Ovomit on the ballot! How do we help get a movement going in our individual states?

About time somebody used their bean and used our Constitution to fight our battles at the state level!

God bless and sustain Joseph – a real American patriot!

Jerry & Bonnie Gallimore

*******

The Soviets are back

I love it. A brain scan for Lt. Col. Lakin. This is what Soviet Russia used to do to dissidents. They would lock them up in mental hospitals. Man, the truth is really dangerous to some people.

J. Morrison

*******


Expose the impostor

I have wondered for some time now if the U.S. military would be the final "backstop" against an Obama coup established through the declaration of martial law. If in fact our military still believes in their oath to "defend this country against enemies foreign and domestic," Lt. Col Lakin has presented the Joint Chiefs with the exact means by which to dispense of our "pretender-in-chief."

Instead of carrying water for Obama, allow the process to go forward through court martial, and get to the "discovery phase," which heretofore has been thwarted. All it would take is the light of truth illuminating the "dark past" of the current office holder of the presidency to save our nation.

Pray to God that our military still has the male accoutrements needed to expose this impostor.

Richard McGowen

*******

Friday April 02, 2010


God speed, Lt. Col. Lakin


While I commend Lt. Col. Terry Lakin for his bravery in challenging the Barack Hussein Obama on the obfuscation regarding his eligibility to be president of the United States ["Army 'showdown' at eligibility corral"], I also pray that God be with him. I'm sure he realizes that the full force of personal destruction by the left will be unleashed on him. Indeed, I even pray for his safety.


His service to the country, as demonstrated by the myriad decorations he has received, will mean nothing as the left, foaming at the mouth, will demonize him, trash him, brand him as a nut-job extremist and call for him to be thrown in jail. In fact, with the level of raw, unmitigated hatred on the left, I'll wager that you'll even see left-wingers calling for a firing squad. I really, really doubt that ordinary people can truly comprehend the level of hatred the left has for the right. It literally rivals the hatred radical Islam teaches against the Jews.


The truly sad part is that the conservative "establishment" will not come to his defense. Talk radio, Fox News and all the conservative talking heads have conceded this issue to the liberals. While they challenge Obama on everything else, on this issue they are wholly spineless. Again, I pray that God be with Lt. Col. Terry Lakin and give him the strength to endure what is undoubtedly coming his way. Other than that, and the support of WorldNetDaily, he is essentially on his own.


God speed, Lt. Col. Lakin. Your service to this country and defense of the Constitution makes you a true patriot.


Mike Michaelian

***********
Barry and his cabal


It is amazing that the controlled "lame stream media" will not cover your story about a top Army doctor basically telling Barry to take his orders and "shove it" until he can prove that he should be in that job! This should be the breaking lead story in every news organization in the world!


Just like dozens of other stories like it, it, too, will be buried and put to rest and nobody will care except the so-called "fringe wacky birthers," as portrayed in the controlled media. Most of America will not even hear about this story nor care.
It is a shame, more people know about some guy crawling through a drive-thru window and slapping a McDonald's employee for a fish sandwich, posted on the Drudge Report, than this story! Who cares except for the people involved!
That courageous highly decorated Army officer may be throwing his career away for nothing and may end up in prison because the controlled "lame stream media" agenda, rather than reporting the "real" news, is to keep Barry Soetoro and his corrupt socialist cabal in power and to fulfill their socialist dream for America by any means necessary.


They will never let his secret high treasonous fraud on America out and treat it as a serious story, because it could be the one thing, among many others, that could land Barry and his cabal in prison for life!


L.J.

*******


Watching his tongue


I find it interesting that whenever Obama mentions "birthers" and the questioning of his eligibility to be president, as well as the questioning of him being a socialist or a Muslim, he never says he is not any of these things, nor has ever actually used the language "I am a natural born American citizen" to rebuff the concerns. It's like he is intentionally not addressing the concerns directly with answers because he knows legally down the road his words will be used against him in a court of law. I also find it interesting that Michelle Obama has never defended her husband over these concerns in the media – as if she knows or has been told not to for legal reasons possibly. 

Can you, Mr. Farah, ever recall him addressing these concerns with direct answers? Interesting, I thought.



Keep up the good work!
Charles Lisman

Wednesday, April 07, 2010

A Must See! The Obama Sphere

This is SO GOOD that I had to change my plans for my next post this morning and present The Obama Sphere which shows - via Obama's OWN WORDS - that he is a perpetual LIAR and guilty of a huge amount of flip-flops. I know. This is not news to anyone who has been paying attention. However, seeing the film clips one by one and back to back of his lies and flip-flops is quite stunning.



[Note: click on upper right hand "X" at top of video box to skip ads.]


Hat Tips: Teresamerica

Bizarre Report.com

*******

Related posts:

Thoughts of a Conservative Christian: A Pattern of Deception

Excerpt:

When he was asking for our vote in 2008, then candidate Barack Obama most famously promised the American people:

And I can make a firm pledge. Under my plan no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.”
[Emphasis added]

He didn’t just make that pledge once or twice. He promised it to the American people over and over, making it the centerpiece of his campaign.

His now enacted health care takeover bill directly violates that pledge. If you do not obtain the health insurance that Obama and Congressional Democrats now demand by law, either through your employer or directly yourself, then you must pay a new 2.5% income tax, or a minimum of $695 per person up to $2,085 per family. This applies to everyone making less than $250,000 per year as well as those making more than $250,000 per year. It cannot be logically denied that this violates a pledge not to impose any form of tax increase on such workers, though President Obama has, indeed, tried to so deny it.


Continue reading here

*******

Monday, April 05, 2010

Just How Committed Are We?


Read a great political opinion piece in the Good News Etc. April edition that asks the question, Just how committed are we?

Author Frank Kacer writes:



Over the years I've called many to task for not being engaged in the cultural battles, and in particular the political realm that's failed us at virtually every level of government. I've shown a particular concern over pastoral leadership that is more concerned about church growth and not offending than openly proclaiming righteousness and equipping their flocks to influence our society -- whether our neighborhood, cities, state, nation, or beyond.

In some sense, the opposite has occurred. Instead of us being the salty antiseptic and preservative, we're called to be for the common good -- the rotting culture has invaded our personal lives, families, and even our worship. Instead of being thoroughly equipped to share God's truths and light, in many ways we've settled for a designer faith suited to our individual, compromised tastes. Instead of fulfilling our mandate to love our neighbor, the government and a myriad number of secular organizations have co-opted our role, seeing our Christian witness as irrelevant to the decay around us.

Are there exceptions? Of course there are. But far too few compared to the number that claim the name of Christ. In some sense, the culture is a reflection of us. As our community of faith has become compromised (drug abuse, divorce, abortion, immorality, etc.) the society has just taken it further with no accountability.

Where has this slide into a weak, unengaged Christendom brought us?

The recent battle over passage of Health Care legislation shows how unrestrained and out of touch our government has become. We share responsibility for this through a long term pattern of apathy and inward, not outward focus. This fiasco has shown the incredible power and arrogance of politicians unmoved by any understanding of the need for limited government, the baseness of man's nature, and the destructiveness of fiscal irresponsibility.

The impact of total government control of health on the sanctity of life, and the treatment of the elderly and the frail will be devastating as it takes over life and death decisions from conception to death, and removes any allowance for conscience by health practitioners and distributors. The cascade of legislation we can now expect will be dizzying: amnesty of illegal aliens, overturning of the federal DOMA, silencing of conservative talk radio, direct confrontation of biblical preaching as hate speech, and on and on.

If the "Christian" community doesn't wake up, if it thinks government will leave it alone -- if it just wants to be comfortable while virtually all major media, entertainment and government power is being arrayed against it -- then the time will come, rather quickly, that it will be forced to face persecution unseen in our nation's history. As this begins to happen, how committed will you be? How much have you weighed the cost, thought through whether you'll hide or take up your cross each day and fight for righteousness and the glory of God?

Like it or not, recognize it or not, we are in a war for life itself. Our generation has seen the tipping point and it will only get worse if we ignore the warning signs. Bear in mind, the rest of this year is crucial in many ways. Christians as well as non-Christians are finally upset with the failure of government to show any restraint. Primaries and mid-term elections in the fall can send a powerful message that enough is enough. I'll ask again, how committed are we? Are we willing to do everything we can to elect those that represent our values? Are we willing to remove from government those with an ideological blindness trying to create an environment corrosive to the gospel and our fulfilling our cultural mandate? Are we willing to research candidates, encourage good one, walk precincts, fund campaigns, call friends and neighbors and encourage them to become actively involved? Are we willing to tithe our time, talents, treasures, and prayers to turn the tide in removing elitists and replacing them with men and women that respect and support our values, our freedoms and our faith?

If the last year has not brought you to the point of doing something, what will? If not this year, when?

Frank Kacer is director of the Christian Citizenship council of San Diego. He can be reached at frankkacer@hotmail.com.

*******

When I read that essay, it seemed like Kacer was reading my mind!! I have been very disappointed in some fellow Christian friends and acquaintances who have sat on their rears and not spoken out against this gangster government that is robbing us blind of our wealth, our freedoms, our moral, values, and ethics, and are running up a tab of debt that will be impossible for our children and grandchildren to ever pay back!

Despite all of these facts, there are people who just choose to keep their heads in the sand. Case in point.

Many months ago, a fellow Christian friend encouraged me to join Facebook. I must have received three email invitations from her over the course of several months. I also received invitations from two other blogging friends. Finally, I decided to join and my daughter set me up. I linked my Talk Wisdom blog via Networkedblogs, and my postings appear on my home page and the pages of my friends. The following is a description of an incident that recently happened. The names have been changed for privacy purposes.

I went to my Facebook email system and attempted to invite four friends to a new Bible study on the topic of Heaven. One of the four friend links wasn't showing up and I wondered what had happened. We had been friends for several months now. I come to find out that "Terry" deleted me from her friends list! I thought that maybe some kind of error occurred, so I sent an new friend request message to her.

Meanwhile, another friend told me that she was told by "Terry" that she had deleted me because she thought that her other friends might be offended by what I post.

Oh my....how controlling can a person get?

As soon as I found this out, I rescinded my "friend request." She gave me some lame excuse about not wanting "anything political" on her page. I wrote back:

Did you know that there is an icon to the right of each post on the Newsfeed that says "hide"?

Did you know that there is an icon to the right of each post on your profile page that says "remove"?

All you need to do is run your cursor over there and the words will appear so that you can either hide or remove any "objectionable" post.

I always knew that you were a very controlling type of person, but I never dreamed that you would be THIS controlling! Free speech and all that - you know - the rights that our Constitution guarantees all of us.

Sorry, but I think that your excuse that some of my posts might "offend" your other friends is quite lame.

When I told my daughter what you did she said, "A real friend would never do that."

I think I agree.

*******

I also wrote back to my other friend "Karen" and said:

Look. I know that there are people in my husband's family who are raging liberals and probably don't like what I write. But even THEY never thought to delete me!

If she apologizes to me then I will reconsider. If she doesn't, then forget it! This incident will always be in the back of my mind as quite the insult.

What I write about at my blog are important things about what is happening in our country today. Heck! Her own brother moved to another country because of Obama's policies! What does that tell us?

I know that much of what I write at my blog doesn't interest you either. So be it! But you didn't delete me.

I think that she is a coward if she has to be so "frightened" about what her other friends may think about my postings. I would really like to know just who complained?

On the other hand, I write a LOT of good blog posts that are Christian and encouraging in nature. Therefore, she and her friends are missing out on them.

Because of the error of the Obama election, I have been reading, reporting, observing, writing and protesting (at local TEA Parties) over the past two years. We are in danger of losing many of the freedoms that most Americans have taken for granted!

I hope to God that I am wrong and that our nation will survive as the Constitutional Republic that the Founders began when the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution were written.

Ben Franklin once said (to a lady who asked "what kind of government have you given us, sir?) "A Republic - if you can keep it." Ronald Reagan once stated that if we aren't careful and diligent, we are only one generation away from losing our Republic. He also stated:

“Are you willing to spend time studying the issues, making yourself aware, and then conveying that information to family and friends? Will you resist the temptation to get a government handout for your community? Realize that the doctor’s fight against socialized medicine is your fight. We can’t socialize the doctors without socializing the patients.

Recognize that government invasion of public power is eventually an assault upon your own business. If some among you fear taking a stand because you are afraid of reprisals from customers, clients, or even government, recognize that you are just feeding the crocodile hoping he’ll eat you last.” - Ronald Reagan

If informing people about the dangers of this current terrible gangster government is something that "Terry" wants suppressed from her friends, then I REALLY feel sorry for her!

Now that "Terry" knows that she can hide any objectionable posts that she sees posted by me, she has NO EXCUSE for not adding me back to her friend list. It is the height of insult to do what she did and if she doesn't apologize and admit that she was wrong, then I have no choice but to believe that she just could care less about our friendship.

It's really ironic! "Terry" was one of the first people to email me (months before I decided to join) and invite me to join Facebook. I had accumulated about 5 invitations from people before I took the "plunge" and joined. I thought that since I was too busy blogging, I wouldn't have time to attend to the Facebook page. Then, my daughter told me that lots of people connect their blogs to their Facebook pages. That convinced me to join.

I am so sorry that you are in the middle of all of this. But it just couldn't be helped. It's not your fault and I don't blame you one bit. I blame "Terry." I know that you think that she "didn't mean anything by it," and "didn't mean to hurt me." If those are true and genuine statements, then she should take the necessary actions to repair the situation.

*******

Everyone reading this will have their own opinion about this particular incident. So be it. But my opinion isn't any less valid.

In fact, I think that sounding the alarm bells is greatly needed amongst those who would lay down and let the Marxists set up a tyranny right before our very own eyes here in America!

I am used to rejection. I have gone through it in the sales industry and while attempting to witness about the Gospel of Jesus Christ to nonbelievers. But when a friend is willing to turn a blind eye from the current government takeover of our Constitutional Republic and let radicals in power turn it into a repressed socialist country like that Commie Hugo Chavez did in Venezuela, then I think that it is THEY who need to wake up from their stupor and do all that they can to help spread the word and work to save the nation for our children and grandchildren!

Letting this horrible regime run roughshod over our Constitution, Declaration of Independence, freedoms, liberty and inalienable rights guaranteed by God our Creator; while not doing anything within our power to turn the tide back for the sake of our country's future, is a terrible sin!

There are examples in the Bible where women faced possible death for confronting kings! Did they shrink away from their responsibility? NO!

I don't think that we should shrink away from our current responsibility to change the direction of this country from the evil track it is on today. We desperately need to get America back to a sane, conservative morals, values, ethics, and limited government!

This is no time for apathy!! We all need to become Christian culture warriors in this current war against our liberty and freedom!

These clowns in Congress are supposed to serve US! WE THE PEOPLE surround THEM - NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND!

November will be a huge wake up call. VOTE OUT ALL THE BUMS THAT DIDN'T LISTEN TO WE THE PEOPLE!

I continue to listen, report, work, and pray that our nation survives this national nightmare.


I hope and pray that readers here will wake up and do the same!






Hat Tip:

Good News Etc. online edition

Sunday, April 04, 2010

An Empty Tomb or an Empty Faith?


From David Jeremiah.com:

Do you ever wonder how your life would be different if certain events hadn’t taken place? Our lives are often full of, “What if’s.” What if we had chosen a different college? What if we had never gotten married? What if we never had children? Some people even question the validity of Jesus Christ. What if Christ never rose from the grave? What then? What would be the implications? Dr. Jeremiah outlines five realities of an unrisen Savior.
View the entire broadcast:

Dr. David Jeremiah: An Empty Tomb or an Empty Faith?

EASTER PROGRAMMING
Dr. David Jeremiah

“An Empty Tomb or an Empty Faith”
1 Corinthians 15:12-19

April 4, 2010
Corinthians 15:14

I. If There Is No Resurrection Our Preaching Is Foolishness

II. If There Is No Resurrection Our Personal Faith Is Futile
1 Corinthians 15:14, 17

III. If There Is No Resurrection Our Profession Is False
1 Corinthians 15:15

Acts 1:22
Acts 2:32
Acts 3:14-15
Acts 5:30, 32
Acts 10: 39

IV. If There Is No Resurrection Our Promise of a Future Is Fraud

1 Corinthians 15:18
John 14:19

V. If There Is No Resurrection Our Prospect for this Life Is a Fantasy

1 Corinthians 15:19
1 Corinthians 15:20
John 1:12

Saturday, April 03, 2010

What Was So Good About It?


Yesterday, I attended the 12 noon Good Friday service at my former church. It is good to be in the house of the Lord to commemorate His sacrificial death on the cross. Jesus did what he did for the forgiveness of our sins - the sins we ALL commit and would ultimately die with; staining our souls forever. If not for Christ's greatest act in all of Creation, we would not have any way to be reconciled back unto God.

The pastor asked the question, "What is so good about Good Friday?" After viewing a portion of the movie, The Passion of the Christ where we saw Jesus beaten so severely by the Roman soldiers, and forced to carry that heavy cross to Golgotha (which means "the place of the skull") while the soldiers continued to whip Jesus during the terrible journey; that question has to come into every mind that witnessed such a horrid event.

In previous posts on Good Friday, (see Calvary, Good Friday and The Power of Christ's Cross, I discussed many aspects surrounding the Cross at Calvary and why people who do not yet know Christ, still seek him today:

On a KLOVE radio show back in 2007, the host said, "people fall into two camps; those who know Jesus Christ and those who want to know Him."

Wow. Simple but profound. Even those who won't admit it, still want to know Him. Why? Because to know Him is to know God. Jesus was God in the flesh. That is why it is said in the Bible, "they shall call him Immanuel." "Immanuel" means "God with us."


Some people question why Christ had to endure what he did:

Why was Jesus tortured, maimed, spit upon, beard torn, whipped beyond recognition, stabbed in the side, nailed to a cross, humiliated unto death? Because that is exactly what evil does. God allowed those forces of evil to do what they did in order to send us a message so strong that we couldn't possibly miss it.

The enemy of our souls has the goal of devouring us in our sin. He prowls around like a roaring lion, bringing along with him evil, sin and death. That very thing was conquered by Christ at the cross. Because he was the "sinless Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world," he accomplished what no ordinary man could ever do. He kept the Law while on earth, then paid the penalty for our sin so that we would not suffer an eternity without him! He was bodily resurrected to life on that first Easter morning approximately 2,000 years ago, and that event changed the world forever.

Why would Jesus endure all of this for us? The Bible tells us, "while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us." Put another way through a popular Christian song that plays on the radio (speaking of Jesus' sacrifice), "You would rather die, than to ever live without me."


As I watched the scourging of Jesus, once again, in church yesterday, I was reminded of the fact that what happened and what we witnessed was exactly "what evil does."

Scripture tells us that for a time, God the Father turned His back from His beloved Son as he hung on the cross with our sins laid upon him. It was the only time that Jesus did not call God "his Father" - he yelled out, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"

Forsake means: "to quit or leave entirely; abandon; desert" and "to give up or renounce."

God cannot look upon sin. He is Holy and Righteous, so at the moment of humanity's sins being laid upon our Savior, Jesus Christ, God the Father forsake his son.

But look at the second part of the meaning of the word "forsake." It says, "to give up or renounce." Christ's body was given up for our sakes, his blood was shed for the forgiveness of our sins. His body was terribly bruised, beaten, and bloodied because that is what evil does. The horror of that event is relived each time we see any depiction of the crucifixion. It was a terrible and horrendous way to die.

Look at it this way. Our sins were nailed to the cross. They were buried in the grave. Only Jesus, risen in holiness and righteousness came out of that tomb!

In another scene from The Passion of the Christ, we see Jesus' earthly mother - Mary - rushing to pick up and comfort her son when he had fallen down as a young child. The scene shifts to the current day, where Mary witnesses her son falling under the heavy weight of the cross on his way to being crucified. She runs towards him, wanting to comfort him once again as she did when he was a child. However, Jesus says to her, "Mother, I am making all things new." After he said those very words, he finds the strength to stand up with that heavy burden of a cross and continue on the journey to death. What a powerful moment! It was as if he was saying, 'I'm doing this for you - and for all mankind.'

He was.

That is exactly why he did this.

It is exactly why he WILLINGLY went to the cross - for our sakes.

We know from Scripture that Jesus could have called down legions of angels from heaven to relieve him from that cross. People who witnessed the crucifixion even mocked Jesus, challenging him to prove that he is the Son of God by coming down from the cross!


Mat 27:40 And saying, Thou that destroyest the temple, and buildest [it] in three days, save thyself. If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross.


But if he did that, then we would not have had our sins forgiven. There would be no salvation for mankind, no means of reconciliation between sinful, evil men and Holy, Righteous God. Jesus would have re-entered heaven alone.


Why would Jesus endure all of this for us? The Bible tells us, "while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us." Put another way through a popular Christian song that plays on the radio (speaking of Jesus' sacrifice), "You would rather die, than to ever live without me."


THAT is what is so good about Good Friday.

Recall what Jesus said about "this temple" (he meant his body):


Jhn 2:19 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.

Mat 26:61 And said, This [fellow] said, I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to build it in three days.


He is ABLE! Jesus was, is, and forever will be ABLE to accomplish what no man or angel in heaven could have EVER achieved!

Christ's resurrection from the dead was the greatest event in human history! When Christ arose, he had a new, resurrected body (to show us what our new bodies will be like when resurrected for the Millennium), but with the markings of the scars of the crucifixion (recall, the risen Christ told doubting Thomas to put his hand in his side - where the Roman soldier's spear pierced him after Jesus was dead on the cross) to remind all of heaven who he is and what he has done for the salvation of men.

Recall that the disciple John was the only one who stayed with Jesus at the cross. He was later sent to the island of Patmos, where he was brought "into the spirit" and saw visions of what will occur at the culmination of human history.

Revelation 5 (NLT) helps explain to us why Christ is worthy to break the seals of the scroll in the end times:

Rev 5:1 And I saw a scroll in the right hand of the one who was sitting on the throne. There was writing on the inside and the outside of the scroll, and it was sealed with seven seals.


Rev 5:2 And I saw a strong angel, who shouted with a loud voice: "Who is worthy to break the seals on this scroll and unroll it?"


Rev 5:3 But no one in heaven or on earth or under the earth was able to open the scroll and read it.


Rev 5:4 Then I wept because no one could be found who was worthy to open the scroll and read it.


Rev 5:5 But one of the twenty-four elders said to me, "Stop weeping! Look, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the heir to David's throne, [fn] has conquered. He is worthy to open the scroll and break its seven seals."


Rev 5:6 I looked and I saw a Lamb that had been killed but was now standing between the throne and the four living beings and among the twenty-four elders. He had seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven spirits [fn] of God that are sent out into every part of the earth.


Rev 5:7 He stepped forward and took the scroll from the right hand of the one sitting on the throne.


Rev 5:8 And as he took the scroll, the four living beings and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb. Each one had a harp, and they held gold bowls filled with incense--the prayers of God's people!


Rev 5:9 And they sang a new song with these words: "You are worthy to take the scroll and break its seals and open it. For you were killed, and your blood has ransomed people for God from every tribe and language and people and nation.


Rev 5:10 And you have caused them to become God's Kingdom and his priests. And they will reign [fn] on the earth."


Rev 5:11 Then I looked again, and I heard the singing of thousands and millions of angels around the throne and the living beings and the elders.


Rev 5:12 And they sang in a mighty chorus: "The Lamb is worthy--the Lamb who was killed. He is worthy to receive power and riches and wisdom and strength and honor and glory and blessing."


Rev 5:13 And then I heard every creature in heaven and on earth and under the earth and in the sea. They also sang: "Blessing and honor and glory and power belong to the one sitting on the throne and to the Lamb forever and ever."


Rev 5:14 And the four living beings said, "Amen!" And the twenty-four elders fell down and worshiped God and the Lamb.

NLT Footnotes:
(5:5) Greek the root of David.
(5:6) See note on 4:5.
(5:10) Some manuscripts read they are reigning.

Thursday, April 01, 2010

Utter Darkness (or so they thought)


Utter Darkness (or so they thought)

It couldn’t have been any worse for the remaining 11 disciples and the women closest to Jesus of Nazareth. As they watched, their Hope was torn apart, then hung on a post in humiliation to die, and “darkness came over the whole land.”

We can’t imagine the depth of their bewilderment. The darkness over the land couldn’t compare to the darkness of their souls. Three years of walking with Him had given them excitement for the installation of a new kingdom on earth! But it was all for naught, or so they thought.

That was the human perspective, but this is the real story:
It was that ugly three-letter word – sin. Sin is what the holy God could not look upon, but He longed to fellowship with us. All of humanity had been paralyzed by sin, and our human efforts to abide by the law had proven futile, time after time.

In the greatest act of mercy, the Father offered up His perfect sacrifice on our behalf. At that moment in time, once for all, the Son took on the sin of all mankind. The curtain that separated us from the Holy of Holies was torn from top to bottom. The righteous God who could not look upon sin made a way for us to come to Him, and by the blood of the Lamb those who believe are made righteous, and can enter into His courts!

But that was just Friday. Wait for Sunday!
The angel said to the women, "Do not be afraid; for I know that you are looking for Jesus who has been crucified. He is not here, for He has risen, just as He said. Come, see the place where He was lying. Go quickly and tell His disciples that He has risen from the dead. . .” And they left the tomb quickly with fear and great joy and ran to report it to His disciples. Matt. 28:5-7a, 8

California Family Council celebrates the risen Savior! Happy Easter!

Hat Tip:

California Family Council

Hilarious April Fools Video of Dems!

Stole this from Nice Deb's site. What a HOOT!! One of the GREATEST April Fools videos OF ALL TIME!

YouTube Video Link: Hilarious April Fools Video of Dems

I agree with Nice Deb and Ace of Spades HQ - every Republican ad needs to show that picture! [Note: click on "Ace of Spades" link above.]

P.S. I just could not stomach posting that photo here at my blog...

But the video is hilarious!

Hat Tips to Nice Deb and Ace of Spades!

May God Protect America Through Our National Nightmare


The Post & Email has a guest editorial post up today called: Letter Sent to Glenn Beck at Fox News.

The author asks, "IF YOU LOVE THE CONSTITUTION AS YOU CLAIM, WHY WON’T YOU ADDRESS THE MOST EGREGIOUS VIOLATION OF IT IN U.S. HISTORY?"

Good question. It is one that MILLIONS of people are most likely asking.

I suppose that I could be accused of giving Beck a pass for not being willing to address this explosive issue on his radio or T.V. show. Am I excusing his refusal to bring up the topic? No.

Recall what was written by Joan Swirsky in this post. What if Obama is only hiding his real parentage and both parents were American citizens? Could that be the secret after all?

I don't know. I do find it odd that a person would go to such lengths to hide such a thing. It seems more logical that he is spending 2 million dollars to hide his COLB and many other bona fide documents because he knows he isn't a natural born citizen of the United States of America which would disqualify him from the presidency.

One day, the truth will come out. Meanwhile, people like Beck and other conservatives in the media are focusing on ousting the corrupt Dems (especially Reid and Pelosi) from power this November. This will cut Obama's power grab in Washington D.C. and make him a lame duck until 2012.

I think that we can surmise exactly why Beck doesn't bring the issue up. He has often been quoted as saying the following:


'There are many things that I believe that I shall never say. But I shall never say the things that I do not believe.'


When CNN's Lou Dobbs questioned Obama's eligibility, he got booted from the network. The control over the media is terrible from the ObaMAO regime. However, as long as Beck doesn't bring up the eligibility issue, he can say whatever he wants. He has awakened a sleeping giant in that the American people now know about Obama's Marxist intentions.

In the past, I have heard Beck say that the eligibility issue would be a losing battle. Perhaps he's correct? Instead, he has chosen to focus on what he is currently passionate about - waking up millions of Americans and encouraging us to bring America back to our Founding Fathers intentions. Through faith, real, genuine hope, and charity, we can all help elevate our founding documents, principles, and values back to their rightful place in this Constitutional Republic.

Don't get me wrong. I am highly supportive and commend the efforts of individuals who have sued Obama and Congress (like Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR Kerchner) and continue to pray that such cases get a hearing in court.

My guess is that one day, Beck and many other conservatives who have chosen to stay silent [for whatever reason(s)] on this particular issue will be able to share the truth about the ObaMAO regime's corrupt rise to power and possible usurpation of the presidency. Perhaps that day will come after the House and Senate are no longer under Dem control. Then Obama will be a lame duck resident at the White House and his policies will no longer be rammed through against the wishes of We The People.

If nothing can be done to impeach him and remove him from office, ultimately, the Obama Error will be over in January, 2013. I just pray for God's continued mercy and protection over our nation until this national nightmare is over.