Sunday, August 12, 2007

Top attorney backs Michael Savage against San Fran official

One of the nation's top civil rights attorneys has offered his assistance in suing a San Francisco city supervisor who attacked nationally syndicated radio talk-show host Michael Savage for his tough stance against illegal immigration.

read more digg story

[H]orowitz wrote: "This Sandoval fellow accused you of using 'defamatory language ... against immigrants.' Of course, this statement by Sandoval is slander. I have listened to your show. You are very complimentary of immigrants. In fact, you frequently mention that your parents were immigrants. The slander by Sandoval arises because he claims that your opposition to illegal entry into this country is somehow a stand against Hispanics. That is like saying that every Border Patrol agent and every Congress person is anti-immigrant because they don't condone illegal border crossing."

"I will back you, Michael, and file this lawsuit if you wish," concluded Horowitz.

The San Francisco government's proposed resolution condemning Savage is just the latest in a major, multifaceted – and largely unreported – effort both in and out of government to transform American talk radio. (bold mine)

The entire campaign, complete with details of battles against Rush Limbaugh, Savage and other top talkers, is revealed in-depth in the current edition of WND's monthly Whistleblower magazine, titled

1 comment:

Christinewjc said...

WorldNetDaily Poll:

What do you think of San Francisco's proposed condemnation of Michael Savage?

Wake up America! Free speech that doesn't adhere to the PC agenda is under massive attack 66.24% (4179)

Savage should sue the city's pants off 14.14% (892)

The city officials in San Francisco are just plain fruitcakes 10.41% (657)

Michael Savage is a national treasure. They should be giving him the key to the city 4.99% (315)

Savage has the right to say what he likes, but city officials have the same right to express their opinion 1.84% (116)

It's just another skirmish in the war on talk radio 1.13% (71)

The city is right, Savage is a hateful racist, and should be condemned in strong terms 0.44% (28)

Other 0.40% (25)

Savage is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things, so the city should ignore him 0.29% (18)

Savage should never be allowed on the public airwaves in any fashion 0.13% (8)