Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Obama Eligibility Challenges Spread to 6 States

If readers watched the videos of the hearing in Atlanta Georgia (links were posted here at Talk Wisdom yesterday) then you would know that the decision in the Georgia case is expected soon. The deadline for papers being entered into the court case is February 1, 2012.

WorldNetDaily reports that ballot concerns are going viral and have already spread to 6 additional states.

Excerpt:

An administrative law judge in Georgia could decide as early as this week whether voters in the state convinced him Barack Obama’s name should be removed from the 2012 presidential ballot because he is not qualified to hold the office.

But win, lose or draw, the fight isn’t going to be over, as other cases are erupting across the nation, with challenges being raised anew even in Obama’s own adopted political network in Illinois.

The Georgia hearing was before Judge Michael Malihi, and while none of the lawyers who appeared in the proceedings was willing to predict what the decision will be, several did confirm that Malihi had considered simply granting them a default victory, because Obama and his lawyers expressly stated they would not participate in a hearing to provide evidence that he is qualified to be on the ballot.

A default presumably would have meant a recommendation from the judge that Obama’s name be stricken from the ballot, a decision which would head for review immediately by Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp.

He, however, was the one who warned Obama of the “peril” of not participating in the hearing when Obama and his attorney had asked that the event be canceled.

Whatever the outcome in Georgia, the issue is gaining traction in other states, too, including Alabama, Tennessee, Arizona, New Hampshire, and even Illinois, Obama’s home political base.


It is important to note that this challenge is different from the birth certificate challenges in the past that were often dismissed due to "lack of standing." Here is why:

The newest round of court actions do not try to have a judge determine Obama is not qualified for the Oval Office and remove him from it, they simply challenge his eligibility for the 2012 election.

Many of the cases cite Minor v. Happersett, a U.S. Supreme Court opinion from 1875 that said a “natural born citizen” would be a person whose parents both were citizens.

“This complaint does not request any injunction against any state or federal government official. Instead this complaint asserts that the private entity, Defendant Democratic Party, intends to act negligently or fraudulently in a manner that will cause irreparable harm to the plaintiffs, to the states, and to the citizens of the United States,” said one of the filings.

It continued, “Because Mr. Obama has admitted that his father was not a U.S. citizen, and because this fact has been confirmed by the U.S. State Department, any reasonable person with knowledge of these facts would doubt Mr. Obama’s constitutional qualifications. Therefore, any representation by the Democratic Party certifying said qualifications would be negligent, absent further evidence verifying Mr. Obama’s natural-born status.

“Plaintiffs further request an injunction prohibiting the Democratic Party from making any representation to any state official asserting, implying, or assuming that Mr. Obama is qualified to hold the office of president, absent a showing by the party sufficient to prove that said representation is not negligent.”

Van Irion, lead counsel for Liberty Legal Foundation, also is working on several of the issues, and has brought the question in court in Arizona.
Excerpt:

“We picked the Arizona court for several reasons, but the main one being that it is part of the 9th Circuit. The 9th Circuit has indicated in dicta that an FEC-registered presidential candidate would have standing for this type of suit,” he said. The organization is working with John Dummett, a Liberty Legal Foundation member who is a candidate for the office of president in the 2012 election.

Irion said the other lawsuit was filed in state court in Tennessee.

“The focus of the state-court suit is to prevent certification to the Tennessee Secretary of State. This suit puts greater emphasis on the negligent misrepresentation/fraud aspects of a certification from the DNC. It includes more facts regarding Obama’s Indonesian dual citizenship and fraudulent Social Security Number,” he said.

He said if the cases succeed, the Democrats would not be able to list Obama as their candidate for 2012.

“Neither lawsuit discusses Obama’s place of birth or his birth certificate. These issues are completely irrelevant to the argument. LLF’s lawsuit simply points out that the Supreme Court has defined ‘natural-born citizen’ as a person born to two parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the natural-born citizen’s birth. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen. Therefore, Obama can never be a natural-born citizen. His place of birth is irrelevant,” Van Irion’s group said.

WND also has reported that Maricopa, Ariz., County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has launched a formal law enforcement investigation into concerns Obama may submit fraudulent documentation to be put on the state’s election ballot in 2012.

Other attorneys involved in the Georgia case are J. Mark Hatfield and Orly Taitz.
Hatfield has told WND that the goal is for a court determination on the definition of “natural born citizen,” which then could be applied directly to Obama’s candidacy.

HT: WND

*******

While doing a search online, I found GodFatherPolitics.com.
This is interesting....

*******

Update @ 8:42 a.m. PT

A link to this post is featured in Georgia Point.com [Note: Scroll down page.]

Monday, January 30, 2012

Obama Ineligibility Hearing Video Links

Here is your opportunity to view what happened at the hearing in the Atlanta, Georgia.  This evening, I found four links via Commieblaster.com of new and enhanced videos of the trial that was held on January 26, 2012 in Atlanta Georgia.

Video 1 LINK

Barack Obama, alleged President, was A.W.O.L. and his atty. too, decided to snub the Judicial ORDER and the Judicial branch of Government, since they did not get it dismissed as hoped. Now EVIDENCE that Barack Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen is ON the Court Record. Taped exclusively for On Second Thought.TV by Lydia Swain


*******

Video 2 LINK
Part 2 of Actual Court Footage, NOT available on Nutwork Nat. TV. Obama is being Disqualified. All evidence was that he is NOT QUALIFIED. Judge must rule with the evidence.... Attys have only until Feb 1, 2012 to get their final motions before the court.


********

Video 3 LINK

Orly TAITZ, the Fact checker gets to bring her case.



*******

Video 4 LINK

Part 4 , OBAMA Disqualification Trial. Atty. Orly Taitz Presents Witnesses, that show Barack Obama uses someone else's social Security number and the White House published Birth Certificate put out is a Fraud. Ms. Linda Jordan, Mr. Bogt, and others testify

*******

Video 5 LINK

Atty & Dr. Orly TAITZ bring devastating testimony from CSI Investigator J. Sampson to prove that Barack Obama is using the Social Security number of a person born in 1890 and assigned the number in 1977 in state of Conn. where Obama never EVER lived. Obama was A.W.O.L. and snubbed the Court, and was Joy Riding in Air Force 1 on this day, Jan. 26, 2012. This is Copyrighted video from William Wagener, but links to the Video are permitted or up to 7 seconds Fair USE.

*******

Video 6 LINK [Final video]

Atty. Orly Taitz takes the witness stand, which is unusal but not improper, and closes her case asking for CONTEMPT charges against Mr. Obama for snubbing the court.



Hat Tips to all links.

Obama Disqualification Trial Video Links - Atlanta, Georgia

This evening, I found four links via Commieblaster.com of new and enhanced videos of the trial that was held on January 26, 2012 in Atlanta Georgia.

Video 1 LINK

Barack Obama, alleged President, was A.W.O.L. and his atty. too, decided to snub the Judicial ORDER and the Judicial branch of Government, since they did not get it dismissed as hoped. Now EVIDENCE that Barack Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen is ON the Court Record. Taped exclusively for On Second Thought.TV by Lydia Swain


*******

Video 2 LINK
Part 2 of Actual Court Footage, NOT available on Nutwork Nat. TV. Obama is being Disqualified. All evidence was that he is NOT QUALIFIED. Judge must rule with the evidence.... Attys have only until Feb 1, 2012 to get their final motions before the court.


********

Video 3 LINK

Orly TAITZ, the Fact checker gets to bring her case.



*******

Video 4 LINK

Part 4 , OBAMA Disqualification Trial. Atty. Orly Taitz Presents Witnesses, that show Barack Obama uses someone else's social Security number and the White House published Birth Certificate put out is a Fraud. Ms. Linda Jordan, Mr. Bogt, and others testify

*******

Video 5 LINK

Atty & Dr. Orly TAITZ bring devastating testimony from CSI Investigator J. Sampson to prove that Barack Obama is using the Social Security number of a person born in 1890 and assigned the number in 1977 in state of Conn. where Obama never EVER lived. Obama was A.W.O.L. and snubbed the Court, and was Joy Riding in Air Force 1 on this day, Jan. 26, 2012. This is Copyrighted video from William Wagener, but links to the Video are permitted or up to 7 seconds Fair USE.

*******

Video 6 LINK [Final video]

Atty. Orly Taitz takes the witness stand, which is unusal but not improper, and closes her case asking for CONTEMPT charges against Mr. Obama for snubbing the court.



Hat Tips to all links.

Media Blackout in Obama Georgia Ballot Eligibility Case

PLEASE take the time to view this very important video and send it to everyone you know!



Hat tip for video:

Cry and Howl states:

"This pretty much confirms the fraud perpetrated by the Congress and the Supreme Court."

As concerned U.S. Citizen Patriots await the decision from Judge Malihi of the Georgia hearing on whether or not Barack Hussein Obama's name can legally appear on the Georgia ballot for the 2012 election, WorldNetDaily has been sharing written articles about Obama's ineligibility ever since the 2008 election.

Haven't we all been hearing that this issue needed to be solved before the vote occurred in 2008? Well, now we have a second chance to make sure that an ineligible candidate for POTUS does not get on the ballot(s) in either Georgia or any other state.

Canada Free Press reminds us:


Though Hillary Clinton rarely gets the credit anymore for it, she was the ‘mother’ of the ‘birther’ movement. While many people know the “birther” movement as one challenging President Obama’s birth certificate and birth place, there is another aspect of it that often gets overlooked. This aspect is that of him meeting the ‘natural born’ clause of the Constitutional requirement to be president.

When John McCain’s eligibility was challenged during the 2008 campaigns, Congress, including Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama, declared he was “natural born” and eligible due to him being born of two American citizen parents. Barack Obama, himself, by his own admission, does not meet this criteria because his father was a British subject. This is backed up by the birth certificate he produced April 27, 2011."

The interest in this case is skyrocketing across the blogosphere. Everyone is waiting anxiously for the judge's decision. Since this was the ONLY case to be adjuticated (all other cases were dismissed due to lack of standing) the good news is that the state of Georgia REQUIRES candidates to be completely vetted before any individual who wants to run for the position POTUS gets on the ballot. This is a new election, new day, and new requirement that is separate from what had happened in 2008. Obama is like any other person who is requesting to get on the ballot in that state, as well as all others.

The fact that the plaintiffs did not just accept a default judgment, but wanted to present some of the most crucial the evidence against Obama that they have accumulated over the past four years, brings in another important fact for the judge to consider.

Note these comments from the over 300 over at the WorldNetDaily site:

1badland66 1 comment
Obama thumbs his nose at all of our laws. He selectively enforces only those laws that he agrees with. His justice department is just as bad and with fast and furious nipping at their heels it is only a matter of time before Obama and Holder get caughtith their hand in the cookie jar. Maybe we can end all of this when we rid this country of him in 2012. What a blessing that would be for this nation.
A Like Reply 16 hours ago 3 Likes

*******

BKOfama 2 comments
"Take your message of equality of achievement, take your message of economic dependency, take your message of enslaving the entrepreneurial will and spirit of the American people somewhere else. You can take it to Europe, you can take it to the bottom of the sea, you can take it to the North Pole, but get the hell out of the United States of America," Rep. Allen West (R-FL) said at the Palm Beach County Republican Party Lincoln Day dinner. West represents the district in the U.S. Congress. show more show less
A Like Reply 16 hours ago 6 Likes

Way to go Rep. West! Woo Hoo!!!
*******

The Resolute Voice, Commentator and Advocate 6 comments

To say that someone using a fraudulent Social Security number can continue to do so as long as the Social Security Administration won't clarify the situation is also ridiculous. Try doing it and see what happens. II believe it's called identiy theft, a felony. But then, I guess Mr. Obama is above the rule of law?
Reply 17 hours ago 10 Likes

*******

Adam Moreira 2 comments

There is a statute of limitations on it even if fraudulent.
Reply 16 hours ago in reply to The Resolute Voice 0 Like

*******

Thelonglegmackdaddy 1 comment Birthers claim that a use of fraudulent SS Number from Obama is on going. The Statute of limitation only begins to toll after the crime is discovered by law enforcement so the Statute of Limitations is not a relevant issue in this instance.
13 hours ago in reply to Adam Moreira 2 Likes

*******

Thelonglegmackdaddy 3 comments The reason that the Social Security Administration is not paying this any attention is because Obama is using the same SS number that they gave him and therefore there is nothing to investigate.

Reply 16 hours ago in reply to The Resolute Voice 3 Likes

Cashman57 1 comment LOL!!
keep spreading it on thick. The SS administration did not give that number to 0bama, his granny did. That number is not registered in the name of 0bama, anywhere. If he had legally obtained the number that would be one thing, but, that number was issued to someone else. 0bama did not refute that and his absence at the hearing where that evidence was admitted and sworn testimony was heard proves that he does not have a right to that number. He consented to the election laws in GA. by asking to be on their primary. He acknowledged the subpoena with his attorney responding to both the judge and Sec. of State Kemp. By refusing to refute the sworn testimony he has agreed that he is not eligible for the office and is not legally using a SS#.

I'll bet you are your fellow truth haters are sick over his confession. You probably even believed he was telling the truth, but, when the truth came out in GA. he had nothing to say, no defense, basically admitting to every word of the sworn testimony.
A Like 16 hours ago in reply to Thelonglegmackdaddy 5 Likes

*******

poetopoet 1 comment
Collapse Expand If and when any U. S. Federal or State Court ignores and abandons the tenants of the law, meaning “We the People”, the tenants are its citizens who have the right to enforce that right by that law, called the right of suffrage (to vote), that is mandatory, given by the supreme law of the land, The U. S. Constitution, entrusted to each state individually.

Nothing supersedes the U. S. Constitution and nothing will. We the People have put our trust into our elected officials to protect and enforce those rights, to the point where “We the People” cannot even trust ourselves from ourselves or them. Today, with the onslaught and erosion of our personnel freedoms divided by party lines and affiliations. Now each state’s Electoral College will cast their deciding votes, upon each states vetted candidate and voters choice, not the veiled coronation by the mass media or the corrupt DNC or the GOP, whether popular or not. For “We the People” have abandoned and abdicated that right, by letting an illegitimate foreign child to rule the U.S., who is succinctly forbidden to, by documented law, the U.S. Constitution, Article II, § 1(5).

Unfortunately, no one, absolutely no one except a lone Georgia Administrative Judge will defend “We the People”, please God love him and protect him, before anarchy begins.
*******

Amen to that!

*******
Also see:

posted by null at American Thinker - 8 hours ago
Last week a sitting president ignored a subpoena to a historic court hearing that discussed his eligibility to run for a second term. Isn't there a headline in there somewhere?
*******
Important video to view here:
Hat tips to all links.

*******

Update @ 9:38 a.m.


Here is a good question:


Gulagbound: Why did Obama Not Attend Thursday's Hearing in Atlanta?

Excerpt:

(Jan. 29, 2012) – Barack Hussein Obama’s Georgia counsel, Michael Jablonski, had stated that it was “unreasonable1” to expect Obama to attend the ballot challenge hearing in Atlanta on January 26 at 9:00 a.m. ET.

The White House has been posting Obama’s activities day by day this week2, and the schedule now reflects that his schedule was open on Thursday morning. However, The Post & Email has been told by a source that Obama watched the entire hearing remotely. Is that why his morning schedule was open?

At the beginning of this week, the presidential schedule was devoid of entries3. Various external reports were published each morning stating that he planned a trip to the West beginning on Wednesday following his State of the Union address. Currently, the schedule shows4 that he spent time in Nevada on Thursday and then flew to Michigan for an address on Friday morning.

During the early afternoon hours on Friday, Obama went to Cambridge, MD and was scheduled to return to the White House at 3:00 p.m. for a 3:30 meeting with Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton5. The meeting was closed to the press6.


Continue reading HERE

Saturday, January 28, 2012

Rick Santorum: Faith, Family and Freedom

As a Christian Conservative (note what comes first in that label), it is true that I cannot expect to have the luxury of voting for the perfect candidate in 2012. As I had stated previously, I wanted to cast my vote for Michele Bachmann in the Republican primary here in the state of California, but she has since dropped out of the race. I also liked a lot of what Herman Cain was saying in the earlier debates, but the scandal (true or untrue) shoved him out of the race. I am now left with a choice between four men - two of which are now considered "front runners," and two others who have night and day differences (Santorum; Paul) in many policy issues.

I have hated seeing the bickering at the last two debates between Romney and Gingrich. They should be aiming their fire against Obama - not each other!!

I am now leaning towards voting for Rick Santorum. I love the slogan he chose for his campaign: Faith, Family and Freedom.. I think that he holds many of the views that I and the TEA Party Patriots (at least those that I protested with against Obama in 2009) hold dear in our hearts, minds, and souls.

The thunder of success for Santorum wasn't realized immediately after the Iowa Caucuses because Romney was incorrectly announced as the winner. Romney appeared to squeak by in first place with just 8 or 9 votes over Santorum's tally. But after a recount, Santorum was declared the winner with a much larger vote margin.

I watched Rick during an interview with Sean Hannity last night. I liked everything he said during the recent CNN debate and I personally think that he won the debate - hands down. Even though the bickering front runners always seem to get all the publicity, Rick trudges along and has no intention of dropping out of the race. He was so excited to announce that his campaign had recently raised $250,000.00. He has had the least amount of money, but has done, and continues to do, all the hard work (like in Iowa) to get people at each primary stop to listen to his message. I have been listening all along, too, and I like what I am hearing from him. He is straightforward, truthful, and unafraid to express his conservatism on social issues (e.g. pro-life, pro-traditional one man and one woman marriage) no matter how much the leftie lunatics tear their hair out and scream their bigotry at him.

Some of the television pundits are saying that Mr. Santorum doesn't have a chance to win the nomination. Really? What's more, they claim that if he did win the nomination he would lose to Obama. Is that so? How do they know?

Living in the state of California is a surreal experience. There are many Christian Conservatives in my area, but other parts of the state are so virulently progressive leftist, our state always turns out handing our electoral votes to the Democrat. Some of these "I will vote for Obama no matter how much he has trashed our country these past 3 years" can be spotted because they still have Obummer stickers from the 2008 election on their cars.

Back when Gray Davis (Democrat) was ousted as governor, so many Republicans voted in Arnold Schwarzenegger. I just could not pull the lever in the booth for him. I knew he was a RINO - or even worse a Democrat in RINO clothing. I voted for Tom McClintock, even though people said, "he doesn't have a chance." They were correct. People were going for the 'celebrity' on the ballot and look at what a absolutely awful financial catastrophe that clueless 'celebrity' ended up causing in our state! His personal life as a dirt bag cheating husband was awful, too.

I look back at that time and can STILL say that I am still proud of my vote for McClintock.

Ironically, I was reading some comments in a thread about Newt Gingrich over at Legal Insurrection, and found some people discussing Arnold and McClintock:

Rose | January 27, 2012 at 3:59 pm
I would add that we elected Schwarzenegger in California because he was ‘electable’ and look what happened… Dem light. No strength. None of the principles he articulated so beautifully in his speeches. We thought he was one who ‘got it.’ But – in the end, nothing.

We missed our chance to have elected McClintock – who was the real deal, who had the actual knowledge and commitment to do the right thing. Who had walked the walk and done the work in the trenches.

I have no doubt that Mitt Romney is a good and honorable man, and a good businessman – but Newt knows how Washington works, and how to get things done, and he has enough personal arrogance to stand up to any who try to derail his efforts to reform the government to actually get the job done.

I’m not in favor of voting in another Schwarzenegger.

Like or Dislike: 16 1

Log in to Reply JimMtnViewCaUSA | January 27, 2012 at 4:14 pm
Oh man, that brings back painful memories.
I still wince when I think that I voted for Ah-nold instead of Tom McClintock when I had the chance. Ouch, ouch ouch!

When I recall voting for Ah-nold vs voting for the Dem hack-of-the-month, I don’t feel regret though.

Like or Dislike: 2 0

Log in to Reply Sherlock | January 27, 2012 at 4:19 pm
I voted for Arnold too, not because I didn’t like McClintock better but he really had no chance. In retrospect, Grey Davis wouldn’t have been worse..

Like or Dislike: 1 0

Log in to Reply Rose | January 27, 2012 at 8:49 pm
Gray Davis was way worse, another nasty campaigner. Schwarzenegger had potential, but he turned – into a Democrat.

But we can’t blame the governor – any governor – it is the fault of the legislators who have driven the state into bankruptcy. They set the budget, they decide on the spending, they decide to steal the money from counties and then dole it back in the form of grants, raking off the top, and decimating county budgets, pass spending mandates that cannot possibly be met… and yet they get reelected over and over again.

The Democrats should be run out of office on a rail, not to return for 50 years, as punishment for what they have done here.

Like or Dislike: 2 1

danihgh | January 28, 2012 at 3:22 pm
That is what happens when you accept liberals who are pretending to be conservatives in order to get into power. Schwarzenegger was never a conservative and didn’t turn in to a democrat he was always a democrat, just pretending to be something else.

When I look as Mitt Romney, I see Arnold Schwarzenegger. I big government progressive who is playing conservative until he gets in office and then his true colors will come out.

I will not vote for Mitt Romney, the GOP establishment needs to be taken out, even if that means 4 more years of Obama.

If Mitt Romney wins the nomination everything we fought for in 2010, all the rallies, all the establishment Republicans we defeated in the primaries, etc.. will be for nothing.

Like or Dislike: 0 0

Log in to Reply MadCon | January 27, 2012 at 4:03 pm
And then California tried to run the “electable” Meg Whitman against “Moonbeam” Jerry Brown and Whitman got beaten by 13 points.

Romney=Whitman and Moonbeam=Obama.

Ahh yes! The Whitman vs. Brown election will now inflict even MORE taxes on our heavily burdened (and one of the highest levels) state. *Sigh*...no wonder the state is so "blue" - matches the sadness of our residents when the fruits and nuts of this state continually lead us in the direction of Sodom and Gomorrah, death to unborn babies, and financial crisis year after year after year!!

Back to a happier topic - my discussion about Rick Santorum.

I also think that Rick Santorum's wife would be a wonderful First Lady!

No matter what happens, I pray for a special blessing upon Rick Santorum, his lovely wife, their children, and their campaign efforts in this volatile election year of 2012. May God continue to bless them, may God bless and save our beloved nation, may God bless our military, and may God bless our nation's people - even though we don't always deserve His great mercy and grace!

What Really Happened in a Georgia Courtroom on Jan. 26, 2012

While reading a post over at Western Journalism - What Really Happened in a Georgia Courtroom on January 26, 2012 I ran across a comment that gives American Patriots everywhere an idea for requesting that Obama be removed from the 2012 ballot in their states:

Dark_Archer says:
January 27, 2012 at 1:46 pm
An influential Minuteman PAC is weighing in on the argument over Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, with a call for concerned citizens across the country to flood their state secretaries of state offices with requests that Obama be removed from the 2012 ballot.
if your a concerned citizen who once and for all wants this question resolved get involved !!! this is our country lets take it back!!!!

Copy and paste the statement below into an email with your name and town at the bottom of the email google secretary of state for your state to get the correct email address of your secretary of state ::

We respectfully request that Obama be removed from the 2012 ballot, Obama likely does not meet the constitutional requirement of being a “natural born citizen” to be president.

The Founders likely understood that to mean the offspring of two citizen parents and an 1875 Supreme Court decision suggested the same. But Obama, by his own admission, could not qualify under those circumstances because his father never was an American citizen. As our Founding Fathers intended, it is the states which protect us from all out tyranny. The federal election in 2012 and the constitutional eligibility of the candidates is no different. In the end, our states are responsible for ensuring the eligibility of candidates and our states will protect us from the tyranny of a presidential usurper.

your name and town here


People!!!  Are you ready to DO SOMETHING about this travesty of justice and trampling of our liberties by a usurper who was not properly vetted during the election of 2008??  It's time to take ACTION to get the usurper Obama off the ballot in as many states as possible in order to TAKE BACK AMERICA from the tyrant puppet and his puppeteers - all who are currently occupying our White House (illegally!) -  The People's House! -  in 2013 (or hopefully sooner) !

Hat Tip:

Western Journalism

P.S.  Comments?  Questions?  Suggestions for improving that letter would also be greatly appreciated.

Friday, January 27, 2012

Obama Must Think He Is Above the Law [Update #2 - Court videos!]

The aftermath of the hearing in Georgia where a decision will eventually be rendered regarding whether or not Barack Hussein Obama is eligible to be placed on the 2012 election ballot in that state has, unfortunately, already shown us two things:

1. Obama must think that he is above the law.


2. And, as the following post over at American Thinker indicates:




Obama has deliberately turned his back, and walked on by.


And most of the media has followed along right behind him.
Quote from:
posted by null at American Thinker - 57 minutes ago
Two reports from yesterday's hearing in Georgia over Obama's eligibility for the presidential ballot.

More blogposts to read about the Georgia hearing:

Citizenship - Georgia citizens today delivered sworn testimony to a court that Barack Obama is slam-dunk disqualified from having his name on the 2012 presidential ballot...

Click here to read Maggie's Notebook - Citizenship post!

Commieblaster.com has a good roundup of links (including a link to Talk Wisdom in the "Lots of News Reports" link!):


Obama Ineligibility Hearing
-
We Won! (Default Judgement)
- Lots of News Reports
- Court Details
- Local News Report
- Corsi: "Slam Dunk"
- Open Defiance of Law
- Packed Courtroom
- God Bless Georgia!
Media Silent... Crickets Chirping
Also see:

We The People: Obama & his Attorney fail to appear for Trial — 2 Hour Hearing provides Strong Evidence that Obama is not qualified for Ballot


Despite the fact that much of the media of mass deception was AWOL about this topic yesterday, the blogosphere was on fire with millions of people doing searches to find out about this court case, what was said in the courtroom and to review the evidence presented against Obama. Even Talk Wisdom's blog stats were more than tripled yesterday.

Total page views 957 11 (1.14 %)
Total visitors 728 9 (1.23 %)
Total new visitors 644 0 (1.39 %)

However, I discovered something that was very odd over at my Histats page. Throughout the day, the stats that tracked where the website links came from to reach my blog, and even the search engine stats were being deleted from my personal stat page! Does anyone have an explanation for this? Highly disturbing!!


Here is how the Histats compilation ended up yesterday.

1. See above - total page views etc.

2. nz): lunatics- vent blog spot 1 1 1 1 - 100%


2 (com): awake pamphlet 1 1 1 1 - 100%


3 (com): obama eligibility case georgia ballot 1 1 1 1 - 100%


4 : funny obama birth certificate photoshopped 1 1 1 1 - 100%


5 (com): sharing the bread 1 1 1 1 - 100%


6 (com): jay leno jack taylor 1 1 2 2 1'15" 0%


7 (com): obama eligibility case georgia 1 1 2 2 2'6" 0%

3. Referrer websites:

www.commieblaster.com
2 2 2 1 - 100%


2 commieblaster.com
1 1 1 1 - 100%

3 citizenwells.wordpress.com

Isn't it odd that those stats are so low when the total amount of visitor was 728 yesterday???


So my question is, who was erasing those stats from my Histats site??


Here is an example of today at only 6:06 a.m. PT:

Total page views 100 52 (52 %)
Total visitors 81 42 (51.85 %)
Total new visitors 71 41

1 citizenwells.wordpress.com
12 12 12 1 - 100%


2 www.commieblaster.com
12 12 18 1.5 11'11" 66.7%


3 commieblaster.com
9 9 9 1 - 100%


4 beforeitsnews.com
4 4 5 1.2 7'11" 75%


5 romanticpoet.wordpress.com
0 1 1 1 - 100%


6 www.blogger.com
1 1 4 4 7'22" 0%


7 192.168.228.55:9090
1 1 1 1 - 100%


8 www.facebook.com
1 1 1 1 - 100%

9 wtpotus.wordpress.com

com): obama case in georgia 2 2 2 1 - 100%


2 (com): soebarkah 2 2 4 2 1'52" 50%


3 (ca): obama court case 1 1 1 1 - 100%


4 (com): georgia news obama 1 1 1 1 - 100%


5 : obama has been stopped by judge malihi 1 1 1 1 - 100%


6 (com): satan's favourite tool 1 1 1 1 - 100%


7 (com): obama georgia summary judgement 1 1 1 1 - 100%


8 (com): obama eligibility georgia case 0 1 1 1 - 100%


9 (com): obama eligibility case georgia 1 1 1 1 - 100%


10 (com): david jeremiah on president obama 1 1 1 1 - 100%


11 (com): president obama goes to speak with judge malihi 1 1 1 1 - 100%


12 (com): update obama contempt of court 2012 1 1 2 2 17'41" 0%


13 (com): jay leno 7 year old youtube jack taylor 1 1 1 1 - 100%


14 (com): obama georgia court case news 1 1 1 1 - 100%


15 (uk): rosie and jim tin foil 1 1 1 1 - 100%
*******

I know, stats are boring!! But I wanted to show readers here what happened on that page yesterday. Who was doing such a thing? I guess the Obots were out in force yesterday, deleting what links they could find about the Georgia case from the stats site? Perhaps they aren't awake yet this morning so the stats are (so far) untouched?

*******
Lastly, I'd like to repost and share a great comment that was posted in my previous blogpost:

MichaelIsGreat said...
The issue is quite simple. To be President of the USA or to run for the Presidency of the USA, Obama must be a "natural born citizen" according to the Constitution of the USA. The term "natural born citizen" has been defined previously and it requires two conditions:
1) Obama must be born in the USA.
The forged document provided by the White House web site of Obama's supposedly long form birth certificate is simply that, a bad forgery!
Therefore, the only way to check this long form birth certificate is to go to Hawaii and to check directly the original long form birth certificate and in particular to assess if even this original is genuine that is if it is not also a forgery!!
2) Obama's parents MUST BOTH be American citizens.
We know that Obama's father was a Kenyan and that he NEVER was an American citizen!!!!!
Therefore, THIS SECOND CONDITION ALONE DISQUALIFIES OBAMA TO RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA AND IT ALSO DISQUALIFIES OBAMA TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA, NO MATTER THE FACT THAT HE WON THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION!!!!!!


Furthermore, Obama was confronted with the definition of what a "natural born citizen" is when he directly participated in the investigation of John McCain's eligibility to run for the Presidency of the USA. Obama then signed Senate Resolution 511 from April 30, 2008 that reveals the indispensable requirement of having two US citizen parents in order to be a "natural born citizen" according to the Constitution of the USA and therefore to be eligible to run for the Presidency of the USA or to be President of the USA!!!!!
Therefore, once again, Obama knew very well that he FRAUDULENTLY decided to run for the Presidency of the USA despite the fact that he knew perfectly well that he was NOT a natural born citizen and therefore that he was not entitled, according to the Constitution of the USA, to be President of the USA.


First Conclusion:
---Obama is NOT a natural born citizen and therefore he is not entitled to run for the Presidency of the USA nor is he entitled to be President of the USA, no matter the fact that he won the Presidential election!!!!
---Finally, Obama is a former lawyer and therefore OBAMA CONSCIOUSLY, INTENTIONALLY COMPLETELY DECEIVED THE ENTIRE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY RUNNING FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA WHEN HE KNEW PERFECTLY WELL THAT HE WAS NOT ENTITLED TO DO SO SIMPLY BECAUSE HE KNEW VERY WELL THAT HE WAS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, AS THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA REQUIRES ONLY ON THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA!!!!
---THIS HUGE DECEPTION IS MORE THAN A FRAUDULENT ACT, IT IS WORSE THAN ANYTHING IMAGINABLE BECAUSE:
1) IT RELATES TO THE HIGHEST POSITION IN THE LAND, THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA, THAT OBAMA HAS FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED;
2) IT RELATES TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA BEING TRAMPLED UPON FRAUDULENTLY AND ILLEGALLY BY OBAMA;
3) IT RELATES TO THE FACT THAT OBAMA INTENTIONALLY DECEIVED AND MISLED THE ENTIRE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!
ANY PERSON GUILTY OF SUCH SERIOUS FRAUD SHOULD AT LEAST GET A JAIL SENTENCE, NO MATTER THAT OBAMA HAS FRAUDULENTY HELD THE POSITION OF PRESIDENT OF THE USA FOR A PERIOD OF TIME!!!


If you really want to have an expert legal explanation on what a "natural born citizen" truly is according to the Constitution of the USA and why legally speaking it is this way, then I suggest that you read at least a few articles on Attorney Mario Apuzzo's web site "Natural Born Citizen - A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers" at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
In particular, read:
---"The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth" at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/natural-born-citizen-clause-requires.html


January 27, 2012 5:11:00 AM PST

My reply:

Christinewjc said...
MichaelIsGreat,


Thank you so much for stopping by and presenting a precise evaluation of what is at stake concerning Obama's ineligibility. I have visited (and commented) at Mario's blog over the past 3 years as I watched the lawsuits against Obama get dismissed via stupid reasons like the plaintiff(s) not having "standing." I was so glad to see this particular case go forward on the merits, and the evidence has finally been presented in a court of law and is now out there for all to see!


Unfortunately, the media is holding back on spreading this historically important information that was presented at the hearing. My question is why? Why isn't this information going viral? Answer: because we have a media of mass deception that will protect Obama no matter how devastating the facts are about him being a usurper and NOT ELIGIBLE to be POTUS!!


I find all of this highly disturbing - even frightening! What and who are the "powers that be" that could have such far and wide power to squelch such monumental FACTS in order to keep someone (who should be in jail and charged with treason against our country), who is posing as president ILLEGALLY in our nation's capital?? We have someone who is not eligible for the position of POTUS doing everything that he and his puppetmasters want to do to destroy our country! Our nation is being summarily dismantled militarily, torn down deliberately, destroyed right out in the open by trashing our Constitution, ruining the U.S. economically (and on purpose!) by trampling on the rights of the American people!! How is it possible that all of this treasonous, traitorous, fraudulent activity is happening (in so many ways) that it is inconceivable to those who KNOW what is happening to let it go on and on without Obama and his ilk being arrested??


I suppose that I need to be more patient and let this thing play out over the course of time. I just worry that we are running out of time and the Marxist regime taking hold in our country will pull a stunt - like a false flag crisis again - and end up cancelling the election or even something much, much, worse!


I have been reading some excellent follow-up articles re: the Georgia hearing online this morning. They will be included in my next post.


Thanks again for your excellent comment. I appreciate your stopping by and explaining to readers here just how very important and crucial that hearing was! The interest in this topic is immense in the blogosphere. The more people who learn about it - the better. It can't continue to be hidden from the general public forever! And I continue to pray that something is done to IMMEDIATELY remove Obama from office!


January 27, 2012 5:47:00 AM PST

Hat tips to all links.

*******

Update @ 8:23 a.m. PT:

Please read the following article:

WND: Obama accused of disrespecting court, state, Americans.

Excerpts:


Scary thought:


“My personal belief is that if the U.S. Supreme Court held that he was ineligible, he might simply ignore the ruling, and test the will of the nation, just as he is testing the will of the state of Georgia,” he [Donofrio]said.


The arrogance of ObaMAO admin. is evident; but hopefully, the outcome of it all will be closer to what is said here:

The White House today was absolutely silent about the issue. The Georgia case is far different from the lawsuits over the 2008 election, in which judges virtually unanimously ruled that they could not make a decision that would remove a sitting president, no matter the circumstances.


This hearing was about concerns being raised, as allowed by Georgia state law, that Obama is not eligible for the office of president and therefore should not be allowed on the 2012 election ballot.


“If the judge’s recommendation – and I’ve been told that it’s going to be to disqualify Mr. Obama as a candidate – is followed by the secretary of state, Mr. Obama has got a real problem,” said Gary Kreep, of the United States Justice Foundation.


His organization pursued several of the lawsuits over Obama’s occupancy of the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court, where the justices simply decided they wouldn’t be bothered with such issues as the constitutional eligibility of a president.


“He’s thumbed his nose at the court. He’s thumbed his nose at the secretary of state in Georgia. He’s thumbed his nose at the people and said, ‘I’m above it all. I’m above the law,’” Kreep said.


Kreep’s cases have outlined out there is precedent in the U.S. for the removal of a sitting chief executive because of an issue over ineligibility.

UPDATE # 2:




I finally found a blog with a series of videos covering the Georgia hearing yesterday:


Conservative Blogs Central. [Note: Scroll down to videos.]


The audio is a bit garbled, but if you listen carefully you can hear what is going on.

Excerpt from text at site link above:

From Plaintiff, in one of the Georgia challenges, Carl Swensson: To all my friends in battle,


The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there. We argued that all the evidence needed to be entered in to record so the Judge allowed for a speedy hearing where all evidence was entered into the court record. What that means is this… Any appeal, if one is even possible, would be based on the evidence provided by the lawyers in each case. Both Van Irion and My lawyer, Mark Hatfield made certain that our cases and evidence in those two cases would be closed so as not to be affiliated, in any way, with “Birther” Orly Taitz. As expected, she was an embarrassment.


Now we’re merely awaiting the publishing of this Judge’s ruling which, as previously stated, will be a Default Judgment. - Carl
I agree that it was a good thing to separate the first two plaintiffs from the plaintiff who was represented by Orly Taitz.  I applaud the woman for her hard work on this issue, but she has been an embarrassment and distraction in previous cases as well as at this hearing.  It may be due to the fact she is "green" at being a lawyer and/or that English is her third language.  While watching the hearing yesterday, the first two lawyers left the courtroom before Orly presented her case.  The judge in this case appeared to be visibly annoyed at some of what Taitz tried to do in the courtroom.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Obama Eligibility Case In Georgia - Breaking News!! [Update]

Judge Michael Malihi presided over the Obama ballot challenges that were heard this morning in Atlanta, Georgia.

Give Us Liberty blogspot has LOTS of information, partial transcripts, and BREAKING NEWS LIKE THIS:

EXCERPT:

I just got off the phone with Dean Haskins who was in the courtroom this morning assisting with the Art 2Pac live stream. Judge Malihi talked to the attorneys in chambers before the hearing this morning and told them that he was going to enter a DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Obama and recommend that Obama's name not be on the Georgia ballot! All of the attorneys expressed a desire to put an abbreviated streamlined case on the record and the judge agreed.

How does the mainstream media spin this?

The Georgia SOS has already indicated that he will follow the judge's recommendation. That means that Obama will not get any popular vote or electors from the great state of Georgia!
Congratulations to all freedom-loving Americans!

Posted by giveusliberty1776 at 9:58 AM 0 comments

UPDATE FROM GEORGIA!...
Doug Vogt just called and said that the judge offered Orly a summary judgement and the hearing would not be necessary ... but of course she wanted to present it anyway to get this evidence before the public.


Now lets see what the CIA allows the mainstream media to publish. In other words the good news is that the judge will recommend that Obama not be permitted on the Georgia primary ballot in March.

More than 15,000 concerned citizens were online watching and listening to the hearing!

It has been difficult for people to get onto the Post & Email website.

SHARON RONDEAU PROVIDES THE LATEST FROM GEORGIA...


 Via the Give Us Liberty blog, here is what is posted:


Judge Michael Malihi is presiding over the Obama ballot challenges being heard today in Atlanta, GA
(Jan. 26, 2012) — The court convened at approximately 9:30 a.m.  Judge Michael Malihi began by asking those present to stand and reading the last paragraph of Atty. Michael Jablonski’s letter to Brian Kemp, Georgia Secretary of State, “into the record,” commenting that Jablonski was not present at the hearing.
The judge called plaintiff David Welden to stand and asked where he resided and if he were a registered voter in the state of Georgia.  Then his attorney, Van Irion, stood and stated that there were three types of citizenship in the United States.  He then provided argument on the definition of “natural born Citizen,” referring to Minor v. Happersett.
“The court should recognize that the term ‘citizen” is not ‘natural born Citizen,’ Irion said. “The Minor court’s definition of ‘natural born Citizen’ says ‘parents.’
“In closing, this case is about the Constitution,” Irion said. We’ve shown that Barack Obama’s father was never a citizen…and that means he is not constitutionally qualified…Finally, the defendant was ordered to be here, and I wish to state on the record that that shows not just a contempt for this court…”
Then Irion was interrupted and stopped speaking.
9:54 a.m.:  Atty. J. Mark Hatfield stood and stating that he represents Kevin Richard Powell and Carl Swensson.  Hatfield mentioned the White House schedule as he saw that it related to Obama’s lack of attendance at the hearing.
Carl Swensson was sworn in at 9:56 a.m. and stated his residence and county.  Then Kevin Powell was asked the same.  Both were asked if they were able to vote for President of the United States.
Swensson and Powell explained their challenges filed with the Secretary of State’s office to the judge.
Hatfield held up the Certification of Nomination which Nancy Pelosi signed in 2008 to place Obama’s name on the ballot.  The judge asked if it was a “certified copy,” and Hatfield answered that it was.  He then read from it, stating that it did not affirm that the candidates met constitutional requirements to serve, while the wording from the Republican National Committee for its candidates did contain that wording.
The judge asked if the documents were from a “United States government source,” and Hatfield answered “Yes, sir, they were.”
Hatfield cited Jablonski’s January 25 letter “indicating that they did not want the proceedings to go forward and did not want to participate.”  Hatfield also entered into evidence Obama’s book, Dreams From My Father.
Ken Allen, a resident of Arizona, stood to present the documentation he had received from the State Department after submitting a FOIA request early in 2009, which The Post & Email reported on here.  He stated that “Barack Obama Sr.” was “never a citizen.”
At 10:09 a.m. someone said, “Let’s take a short break,” and people stood up and began moving around and talking with one another.
At 10:17 a.m., the court was called back in to order.
Atty. Orly Taitz was called upon to speak.  The Georgia registered voter whom she represents, David Farrar, stood and identified himself.
Taitz utilized a projector on the wall to the right of the judge as an aid in her presentation.  She then stated that evidence existed that Obama possessed Indonesian citizenship, to which the judge was heard by this writer to say, “That’s not relevant.”  Taitz then discussed the court’s decision in Minor v. Happersett and was interrupted by the judge, who said, “Counselor, can you save your argument for the closing?”  She then stopped speaking.
Mr. Christopher Strunk of New York then went up to the front of the courtroom to testify, and Taitz began to ask him questions about the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham, one of which contains the name “Soebarkah.”  Strunk stated, “She wanted that expunged from her record, but we never got that.”
Susan Daniels, Private Investigator from Ohio, then took the stand, and spoke about her investigation which revealed that Obama had reportedly been using a social security number which she contended had not been assigned to him.
Taitz asked Daniels, “What was the social security number attached to your request?” and Daniels read off “042-68-4425.”  Daniels said, “In all my years, I’ve never seen anything like this.”  She stated that the person who had originally owned the number had been born in 1890.
“First I ran the social security number to check the address, and the same number came up for him in Massachusetts, Illinois, and Washington, DC.  It showed a phone number, and it was always the same number…It would show intermittently ‘August 4, 1961′ and ’1890.’”


Also see: The National Patriot blog:

OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW

Hat tips to all links!

[Note:  Reposted due to misspelling in previous post title appearing in search engines.]

*******
Update:

This case was just mentioned on Fox News Special Report show in The Grapevine segment.

Also see:
posted by Phil at The Right Side of Life - 2 hours ago
CBSAtlanta: Judge considers whether to keep Obama on the ballot (no video) WSBTV: Local news videos (“Birther hearing held against President Obama”) (not embeddable) MyFoxAtlanta: Judge Considers Whether ...



Hat tip: The Right Side of Life blog

Breaking News From Obama Eligibility Court Case!!

Give Us Liberty blogspot has LOTS of information, partial transcripts, and BREAKING NEWS LIKE THIS:

EXCERPT:

I just got off the phone with Dean Haskins who was in the courtroom this morning assisting with the Art 2Pac live stream. Judge Malihi talked to the attorneys in chambers before the hearing this morning and told them that he was going to enter a DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Obama and recommend that Obama's name not be on the Georgia ballot! All of the attorneys expressed a desire to put an abbreviated streamlined case on the record and the judge agreed.

How does the mainstream media spin this?

The Georgia SOS has already indicated that he will follow the judge's recommendation. That means that Obama will not get any popular vote or electors from the great state of Georgia!
Congratulations to all freedom-loving Americans!

Posted by giveusliberty1776 at 9:58 AM 0 comments

UPDATE FROM GEORGIA!...
Doug Vogt just called and said that the judge offered Orly a summary judgement and the hearing would not be necessary ... but of course she wanted to present it anyway to get this evidence before the public.


Now lets see what the CIA allows the mainstream media to publish. In other words the good news is that the judge will recommend that Obama not be permitted on the Georgia primary ballot in March.

More than 15,000 concerned citizens were online watching and listening to the hearing!

It has been difficult for people to get onto the Post & Email website.

SHARON RONDEAU PROVIDES THE LATEST FROM GEORGIA...


 Via the Give Us Liberty blog, here is what is posted:


Judge Michael Malihi is presiding over the Obama ballot challenges being heard today in Atlanta, GA
(Jan. 26, 2012) — The court convened at approximately 9:30 a.m.  Judge Michael Malihi began by asking those present to stand and reading the last paragraph of Atty. Michael Jablonski’s letter to Brian Kemp, Georgia Secretary of State, “into the record,” commenting that Jablonski was not present at the hearing.
The judge called plaintiff David Welden to stand and asked where he resided and if he were a registered voter in the state of Georgia.  Then his attorney, Van Irion, stood and stated that there were three types of citizenship in the United States.  He then provided argument on the definition of “natural born Citizen,” referring to Minor v. Happersett.
“The court should recognize that the term ‘citizen” is not ‘natural born Citizen,’ Irion said. “The Minor court’s definition of ‘natural born Citizen’ says ‘parents.’
“In closing, this case is about the Constitution,” Irion said. We’ve shown that Barack Obama’s father was never a citizen…and that means he is not constitutionally qualified…Finally, the defendant was ordered to be here, and I wish to state on the record that that shows not just a contempt for this court…”
Then Irion was interrupted and stopped speaking.
9:54 a.m.:  Atty. J. Mark Hatfield stood and stating that he represents Kevin Richard Powell and Carl Swensson.  Hatfield mentioned the White House schedule as he saw that it related to Obama’s lack of attendance at the hearing.
Carl Swensson was sworn in at 9:56 a.m. and stated his residence and county.  Then Kevin Powell was asked the same.  Both were asked if they were able to vote for President of the United States.
Swensson and Powell explained their challenges filed with the Secretary of State’s office to the judge.
Hatfield held up the Certification of Nomination which Nancy Pelosi signed in 2008 to place Obama’s name on the ballot.  The judge asked if it was a “certified copy,” and Hatfield answered that it was.  He then read from it, stating that it did not affirm that the candidates met constitutional requirements to serve, while the wording from the Republican National Committee for its candidates did contain that wording.
The judge asked if the documents were from a “United States government source,” and Hatfield answered “Yes, sir, they were.”
Hatfield cited Jablonski’s January 25 letter “indicating that they did not want the proceedings to go forward and did not want to participate.”  Hatfield also entered into evidence Obama’s book, Dreams From My Father.
Ken Allen, a resident of Arizona, stood to present the documentation he had received from the State Department after submitting a FOIA request early in 2009, which The Post & Email reported on here.  He stated that “Barack Obama Sr.” was “never a citizen.”
At 10:09 a.m. someone said, “Let’s take a short break,” and people stood up and began moving around and talking with one another.
At 10:17 a.m., the court was called back in to order.
Atty. Orly Taitz was called upon to speak.  The Georgia registered voter whom she represents, David Farrar, stood and identified himself.
Taitz utilized a projector on the wall to the right of the judge as an aid in her presentation.  She then stated that evidence existed that Obama possessed Indonesian citizenship, to which the judge was heard by this writer to say, “That’s not relevant.”  Taitz then discussed the court’s decision in Minor v. Happersett and was interrupted by the judge, who said, “Counselor, can you save your argument for the closing?”  She then stopped speaking.
Mr. Christopher Strunk of New York then went up to the front of the courtroom to testify, and Taitz began to ask him questions about the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham, one of which contains the name “Soebarkah.”  Strunk stated, “She wanted that expunged from her record, but we never got that.”
Susan Daniels, Private Investigator from Ohio, then took the stand, and spoke about her investigation which revealed that Obama had reportedly been using a social security number which she contended had not been assigned to him.
Taitz asked Daniels, “What was the social security number attached to your request?” and Daniels read off “042-68-4425.”  Daniels said, “In all my years, I’ve never seen anything like this.”  She stated that the person who had originally owned the number had been born in 1890.
“First I ran the social security number to check the address, and the same number came up for him in Massachusetts, Illinois, and Washington, DC.  It showed a phone number, and it was always the same number…It would show intermittently ‘August 4, 1961′ and ’1890.’”


Also see: The National Patriot blog:

OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW

Hat tips to all links!