Why The Unholy Alliance of Islam and Communism? Taqiyya?

H/T:  Pinterest.com


I have been racking my brain trying to figure out why House Speaker John Boehner refuses to form a Watergate-style congressional committee to investigate Benghazi.  It looks like Trevor Louden has figured it out and has revealed the reason for Boehner's reluctance.  It stems from the fact that Boehner had been briefed on the Syria situation regarding arming the rebels against Assad's army; along with his knowledge of arms shipments to al-Qaeda terrorists in Libya and Syria. If this is true, then it may come out in the hearings that Boehner could also be held accountable for the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi!

I think that Boehner, McCain, Graham and others who have trusted Islamists in the war on terror have been fooled by radical Islam's doctrine of al taqiyya.   [Please read that al taqiyya link.  You will better understand the rest of this post.]


Pressure Builds on Boehner Over Benghazi




Excerpt quote:

Informed speculation mounted at Monday’s Accuracy in Media conference, which officially launched the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi, that House Speaker John Boehner’s opposition to a Watergate-style congressional committee to investigate Benghazi stems from his knowledge of arms shipments to al-Qaeda terrorists in Libya and Syria.

The al-Qaeda terrorist attack on the American diplomatic mission at Benghazi, in Libya, on September 11, 2012, resulted in the deaths of four Americans, who were left to die, rather than be rescued, and has been called by some the “Benghazi Betrayal.”

The dead were U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, American diplomat Sean Smith, and State Department security officers Glen Doherty and Tyrone S. Woods.

Coming just eight weeks before the 2012 presidential election, the Obama administration falsely blamed the attack on a spontaneous reaction to a video critical of Islam, rather than blaming it on al Qaeda.

Charles Woods spoke with emotion at the AIM conference about the loss of his son and asked for people not only to press for answers as to what really happened at Benghazi, but to pray for the country.

Christopher Farrell, Director of Investigations and Research for Judicial Watch, said at the conference that Obama’s lies and distortions about the attack are designed to obscure the central truth that the administration was arming al Qaeda.

“That’s what they don’t want broadcast or printed anywhere,” he said.

As incredible as it sounds, former CIA officer Clare Lopez said support for al Qaeda, the Muslim Brotherhood, and other Islamists groups has become the official foreign policy of the United States under Obama. She said the policy has been on display in Libya, Egypt, Syria, and the United Nations, through the Organization of Islamic Cooperation.

House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) says about Benghazi: “For the past year, this administration has failed to provide sufficient answers, fully comply with subpoenas, and make available relevant individuals to provide testimony. In short, this administration hasn’t been upfront with the American people or this Congress. Republicans will not stop until we get to the truth. We will press forward with our investigation until we have answers, full accountability, and justice.”

However, he opposes the proposal (H.Res. 36) to create a bipartisan House Select Committee to fully investigate the attack and the cover-up. Introduced by Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA), the proposal has 175 co-sponsors.

Several speakers at the CCB conference agreed that being exposed as knowledgeable about the Obama administration’s secret operations in advance of the Benghazi disaster could be extremely embarrassing to House Speaker Boehner and may explain his opposition to Rep. Wolf’s legislative proposal.

Boehner is a member of the so-called “gang of eight” in Congress, members secretly briefed by the administration on top-secret intelligence operations.

Investigative journalist Kenneth Timmerman, who is writing a book on Benghazi, said, “Did they get briefed? Were they briefed on this arms trafficking operation out of Benghazi to the Syrian rebels or were they not briefed? And if they were briefed, is that perhaps a reason why they don’t want a special committee, because in fact they knew about this operation and did nothing to stop it?”

Rep. Wolf spoke to the conference and encouraged the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi, under the direction of AIM Editor Roger Aronoff, to get to the bottom of what happened. Members of this commission spoke at the all-day affair and vowed to continue to press for answers from the administration and Speaker Boehner.

Continue reading HERE.

/unquote

_______________

Well...that certainly explains A LOT - DOESN'T IT?

Just the typical "I don't want to lose my job over this scandal" bulls**t is one reason why getting to the truth about Benghazi has been stonewalled for over a year!

Sounds like Boehner, McCain, and that dopey Lindsey Graham were either misled or complicit in the same way when they claimed that the rebels in Syria were not affiliated with Muslim terrorist groups like al Qaeda and/or the Muslim Brotherhood!  After all, the Muslim Brotherhood members here in the U.S. have had access to Obummer's White House for five years!  They have visited so often, they probably wore out their own foot path on the carpet!

For some time now I have been trying to figure out why Obama's "advisor" - Valerie Jarrett - (who is Iranian) would side against Iran in the war on terror?  Obama's siding with the rebels put him against the Iranians, Russia, and Syria.  But now, we have Russia's communist dictator (Putin) getting involved in the Syria conflict; siding with Assad and also planning to meet and talk with Iran! 

Joel Rosenberg's Weblog

Putin positioning himself as new power player in the Mideast, but to what end? Will this ally of Iran & Syria become hostile to Israel? -

Even Obama is planning on holding "talks" with Iran's new leader!

I'd like to ask readers some important questions.  To start off, I will also add that this is a "Talk Wisdom Reports - You Decide" portion of this post.

1.  Do you think that it is possible that the entire threat to attack the Syrian army and Assad because of the use of chemical weapons on people there was a just a ruse? 

2.  Was it their  [Obama and his handlers] plan all along to ultimately side with Russia, Syria and even Iran in the Mideast conflicts and turmoil?  The outcry by Americans (and many around the world) against "shooting missiles across the bow" in Syria because of the crossed "red line" (which blamed Assad of gassing his own people with chemical weapons) gave Obama and his ilk the chance to back out when Putin came in and "saved the day."
 
3.  Do you think that it is possible that this was the plan all along?

Glenn Beck called for Obama's impeachment for arming the rebels (who are mostly al Qaeda) on his radio show.

4.  Do you think that Obama and his criminal enterprise of nefarious characters would switch sides  [from supporting the rebels to agreeing with Putin, and by default, Assad] so abruptly?

If you have been reading this blog over the past three years, then you may have already seen my post from 2010 where I questioned the unholy and evil alliance of radical Islam and Communism.  However, what was displayed in the photo at one of my former blog posts entitled Thank You S.F. Liberals - You Die Last is coming to fruition via the ObaMARXIST BADministration!

Here is the image at the above link.  Notice that the man holding the sign is wearing Muslim terrorist garb.  The man walking next to him is wearing a commie red t-shirt with the image of Che Guevara! 

How ironic that the Muslim man is holding that sign (below)!  Here's a quote from Che Guevara that may explain their union of nefarious ideologies:

"I don't care if I fall as long as someone else picks up my gun and keeps on shooting."

Che Guevara

H/T Brainy Quote

I wish that more Americans would heed Ronald Reagan's advice:

 

“How do you tell a Communist? Well, it’s someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It’s someone who understands Marx and Lenin.”

― Ronald Reagan

 What those two men (seen in photo below, marching together, BTW, in an anti-Israel demonstration during the Bush presidential years) represent is the forming of an alliance between radical Islam and Communism!  Also, notice what the sign says:  "Thank You S.F. (San Francisco) Liberals - You Die Last."  How ANYONE could possibly support either group is beyond any semblance of reason!  Liberals are being USED by both!  Yet they are either complicit in either ideology or just too damn ignorant to realize it!

I thought that the evil alliance of radical Islam and Communism (Putin and his ilk) would one day need to battle against each other for dominance of the world. This may still happen. Perhaps the caliphate-hungry Iran is using Communist Putin in the usual Muslim deceptive tactics known as al Taqiyya?  Muslims might join together and tolerate Communists in an old taqiyya-style kind of temporary alliance.  Why?  Because of their joined hatred of Israel!  They are uniting with the intended plan of making a future collaborated attempt at destroying Israel!

But then, which one [Islam or Communism] will ultimately win out?

Well, this terrorist's quote shows what radical Islam believes:

"Sons of Islam everywhere, the jihad is a duty - to establish the rule of Allah on earth and to liberate your countries and yourselves from America's domination and its Zionist allies, it is your battle - either victory or martyrdom."

Ahmed Yassin
H/T Brainy Quote



And, where does the U.S. fit into this picture?

If the Lord Jesus Christ tarries, then hopefully America will break free from this egregiously criminal ObamaFRAUD tyrannical government with a new conservative leader who will help get us back on track towards restoring our beloved Constitutional Republic!

If not, then we might very well be headed into the fulfillment of end times *prophecy.

I will be back later. Have important errands to do. I will add more links within this post and add more commentary.

~ Christine

Hat Tip: Trevor Loudon's New Zeal blog
Hat Tips to all additional links.


*******


Update 9/22/13

*The prophecies written in the Bible accurately describe the ancient nations that will surround Israel in the last days in an attempt to destroy Her.  Here is an excerpt from a former post about a prophecy found in Psalm 83:2-8.


Today, we are continually witnessing Biblical prophecy happening right before our very eyes!

As astounding as it was, the prophecies surrounding the rebirth of Israel did not stop with the declaration of Israel's independence in 1948.

Three thousand years ago God inspired King David to predict that the reborn nation of Israel would be immediately surrounded by enemies, including the Arab nations of Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon and Syria.

"For lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head. They have taken craftly counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones. They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance. For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee: The tabernacles of Edom, and the Ishmaelites; of Hoab; and the Hagarenes; Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek; the Philistines with the inhabitants of Tyre; Assur also is joined with them: they have holpen the children of Lot. Selah" (Psalm 83:2-8).

In this incredible prophecy, David described the modern states of the Middle East by naming the ancient nations that have now joined with the Palestinians in their attempt to destroy the Jewish state in the last days.

This ancient prophetic list of nations is fascinating, as it enumerates virtually every one of the nations in the Arab confederacy that oppose Israel's existence today:

Edom.........from Esau, brother of Jacob (Jordan)

Ismaelites...descended from Ishmael, son of Hagar (Arabs)

Moab.........son of Lot, (Jordan, east of Dead Sea)

Hagarenes....descended from one of the 12 sons of Hagar

Gebal........ancient Byblus, (north of today's Beirut)

Ammon........son of Lot, (capital of Jordan)

Amalek.......descended from Esau (southern Jordan)

Philistines..from Ham, (throughout Palestine, Syria)

Tyre.........a Phoenician city (Lebanon)

Assur........founded Assyria; (Iraq - Iran)

Children of Lot, Moab, and Ammon, (Jordan)

 *******


In addition to the prophecy in Psalms, below you will find more end times prophecy in Ezekiel.

Ezekiel 35:1-5, 10 describes the coming judgment of God against these Arab nations, including Edom (Mount Seir) in Jordan, because of their centuries-old hatred of the Jews.Ezekiel 35:1 - 15
Judgment on Mount Seir

35 Moreover the word of the Lord came to me, saying, 2 "Son of man, set your face against Mount Seir and prophesy against it, 3 and say to it, 'Thus says the Lord God:
"Behold, O Mount Seir, I am against you;
I will stretch out My hand against you,
And make you most desolate;
4 I shall lay your cities waste,
And you shall be desolate.
Then you shall know that I am the Lord.

5 "Because you have had an ancient hatred, and have shed the blood of the children of Israel by the power of the sword at the time of their calamity, when their iniquity came to an end, 6 therefore, as I live," says the Lord God, "I will prepare you for blood, and blood shall pursue you; since you have not hated blood, therefore blood shall pursue you. 7 Thus I will make Mount Seir most desolate, and cut off from it the one who leaves and the one who returns. 8 And I will fill its mountains with the slain; on your hills and in your valleys and in all your ravines those who are slain by the sword shall fall. 9 I will make you perpetually desolate, and your cities shall be uninhabited; then you shall know that I am the Lord.

10 "Because you have said, 'These two nations and these two countries shall be mine, and we will possess them,' although the Lord was there, 11 therefore, as I live," says the Lord God, "I will do according to your anger and according to the envy which you showed in your hatred against them; and I will make Myself known among them when I judge you. 12 Then you shall know that I am the Lord. I have heard all your blasphemies which you have spoken against the mountains of Israel, saying, 'They are desolate; they are given to us to consume.' 13 Thus with your mouth you have boasted against Me and multiplied your words against Me; I have heard them."

14 'Thus says the Lord God: "The whole earth will rejoice when I make you desolate. 15 As you rejoiced because the inheritance of the house of Israel was desolate, so I will do to you; you shall be desolate, O Mount Seir, as well as all of Edom--all of it! Then they shall know that I am the Lord."'

Ezekiel gave another prophecy against Edom (also called Seir); his first prophecy against Edom is found in 25:12-14. In this prophecy, Ezekiel is probably using Edom to represent all the nations opposed to God's people Chapter 36 says that Israel will be restored, while this chapter says that Edom (God's enemies) will be made "a desolate waste."

Note on 35:2 - Edom offered to help destroy Jerusalem and rejoiced when the city fell. Edom's long-standing hostility against God's people resulted in God's judgment.

Note on 35:6-8 - Ezekiel prophesied not only against the people of Edom, but also against their mountains and land. Their home territory was Mount Seir. Mountains, symbols of strength and power, represented the pride of these people who thought they could get away with evil. Edom's desire for revenge turned against them. Edom received the punishment they were so hasty to give out.



For more on Bible prophecy, please see:

Understanding Bible Prophecy

Prophecy Continually Being Fulfilled

Jerusalem Countdown

David's Incredible Prophecy of Israel's Enemies Today

Zechariah's Warning to Bush and Condi

Discerning Signs of the Times

Why Progressives Should Detest Obama

H/T:  Fellowship of the minds

Today I want to highlight a post over at The Matt Walsh Blog It is entitled Hey progressives, let me explain why you should detest Obama .  Matt's audience and commentators include leftist progressives (I have re-named them REgressives*) and he highlights one of the more nasty responses that he gets from them.

Excerpt:

A multitude of left wingers read this blog. They generally make their presence known by sending me volumes of lovely emails and Face book messages. Here’s an example of one I received after my last post about Obama. This particularly articulate liberal showed great restraint as he voiced his disagreements in a coherent and scholarly fashion:

[Readers need to go to the site to read the trash talk comment.  It's just not language that I want to include here.]

After you read the second paragraph HERE you can also read what Matt has to say about each point he makes in his post:

1. The One Percent

Excerpt:

 Progressives, you hate corporations and you resent the corrupting influence of money in politics? Well, guess which millionaire president cuddles with Goldman Sachs executives every night while he falls asleep on a bed of money? The guy has raked in millions of dollars of campaign contributions from corporations and big banks. And he gives back — oh does he give back. Obama has handed trillions of dollars in bailout cash to bankers on Wall Street and fat cats in swanky corporate offices. Obama loves the rich. He’s done more to steal money from the middle class and give it to the one percent than any president before him.

2.  Anti War

Excerpt:

Liberals, you were “anti-war.” What happened to that? Pick those signs back up. Take to the streets again. News flash: Obama has troops occupying more countries than Bush ever did. He’s got military on the ground in 24 African nations, he’s deployed forces to Yemen and Syria and Libya and Egypt. Three times as many troops have died in Afghanistan under Obama than under Bush. I thought you wanted to bring these men and women home? Obama’s got them spread all over the globe.

3.  Civil Liberties

Copy of points made:
(They were all too good to leave out!)

Liberals, you’re all about civil liberties? Isn’t that what you claim, or claimed? Obama has been Dick Cheney on steroids when it comes to civil liberties and privacy. He signed the NDAA into law. He assassinated American citizens. He oversaw a massive expansion of the surveillance state, including monitoring the phone records of every American. He extended the Patriot Act. He mandated the Insider Threat Program that requires government employees to profile their coworkers. His Justice Department has spied on journalists, and all of his agencies have been absolutely brutal on whistle blowers. Obama never met a civil liberty he supports and wishes to protect.

4.  The War on Drugs

Excerpt:

Liberals, I thought you hate the War on Drugs? Good Lord, Obama has spent 300 million dollars trying to keep medical marijuana away from cancer patients.

5.  Evil Guns

Excerpt:

This president has shipped automatic weapons (you know, the scary kind) to criminals and murderers all over the globe. He sent them to the drug cartels in Mexico. He sent guns and grenades to militants in Egypt and Syria and Libya. He sent weaponry to Somalia. Obama is a HUGE fan of guns, just not when they’re in the hands of American citizens.

6.  Race

Excerpt:

Obama doesn’t even pass liberal muster on racial issues. He was supposed to help lift minorities up and bring them to new heights in American society, instead they’ve suffered mightily during his tenure. Black unemployment has skyrocketed, the median income of black families has dropped, and the wealth disparity between blacks and white has doubled under Obama. Maybe it’s the white half of him that’s causing all of that. I don’t know.
You guys should be more angry at him than I am. He’s simply been everything I knew he’d be, you all are the ones he used and betrayed. I knew he’d be a nightmare, but you folks thought he’d be your dream come true. Now, was this your dream? THIS? Really? Look around you. Look through the haze of your partisan passions and see reality for what it is.

*******
I truly admire Matt's attempt to reason with the REgressives.  However, it appears to be thankless job because of the difficulty to get through to them!

The Bible tells us in the book of Jude that some who are involved with evil will be pulled "out of the fire" before it's too late.  But there will be many who will ignore such a call - to their own pitiful detriment!


Over 90 comments there, but I responded to one in particular:

VinceNT says:

August 17, 2013 at 10:50 pm

Of course the idiot writing the “progressive hate mail” called you a racist. “You’re a racist” is the only argument progressives have!

 

It’s not so much that progressives hate the so-called one per cent — they want to BE the one per cent. Just like the Soviet Union and China were/are ruled by a very small gangster elite. That’s what they aspire to.

 

Progressives only hate guns in the hands of the innocent. They certainly don’t hate them in the hands of psychopathic thugs like Che Guevara. They seemed pretty content with wars waged by so-called “liberation movements” too. Progressives only hate war when freedom-loving people fight back.

My reply:

christinewjc says:

August 18, 2013 at 3:05 pm

Hello Vincent,
I’m new to this blog but wanted to give a thumbs up for the truth you just shared in your comment! Years ago, I wrote a post about a photo of two far leftist protesters at an anti-Israel march in San Francisco who were holding a sign that shows the absolute lunacy of the so-called “progressives.” Clueless, uneducated and uninformed individuals mindlessly follow such dangerous ideologies like Obama and his ilk. Those who still “like” Obama (e.g., Keith Myath) are either ignorant or tolerant of the evil being wreaked upon America.

 Here is the post: http://talkwisdom.blogspot.com/2010/08/thank-you-sf-liberals-you-die-last.html

You will notice the one guy in Muslim terrorist garb, and the guy next to him wearing a Che Guevara image on his shirt! The sign says, “Thank you S.F. liberals – you die last.”

These are the types of people that ObaMARXIST/MUSLIM and his radical Alinskyites support!!   The evidence of these facts are everywhere.  

Check out Commieblaster.com!   
Communist Obama Marxist Socialist Maoist Progressive - CommieBlaster

Liberal leftists are actually REgressives and are not for true progress…but for backward reasoning towards the failed ideologies of the past. They pretend to “tolerate” everyone, but what they do is use people and groups to get what they want to accomplish and then destroy the useful idiots who helped them get there! What’s more, the truth is that they never tolerate those of us with whom they disagree, but rather disparage, denigrate, hate, and spew propaganda against us. They are the arbiters of evil and I think that Thomas Mann had it right when he wrote:

Tolerance is a crime when applied to evil (Thomas Mann).
(H/T – Atlas Shrugs)



Hat tip:

 The Matt Walsh Blog


* Regressive:
4.   Logic. obtained from or characterized by backward reasoning.

*******

Verses of the day:


 

Jud 1:24    Now to Him who is able to keep you[fn] from stumbling, And to present you faultless Before the presence of His glory with exceeding joy,

Jud 1:25   To God our Savior,[fn] Who alone is wise,[fn] Be glory and majesty, Dominion and power,[fn] Both now and forever. Amen.


(1:24) M-Text reads them.
(1:25) NU-Text reads To the only God our Savior.
 1:25) NU-Text omits Who . . . is wise and adds Through Jesus Christ our Lord.
(1:25) NU-Text adds Before all time

Obama Between Egyptian Protesters and a Morsi Hard Place

It's getting late into the evening and after enjoying some time relaxing in the Jacuzzi,  my husband and I want to watch a movie.  Therefore, I will just let these three very important links speak for themselves.

~ Christine

The Ulsterman Report

MUST SEE – Photos Of Egyptians TRUE Feelings For Barack Obama…

 

 

 

"We the People"

Egypt’s President Defies an Army Ultimatum

 

 

And now...I present what many people (at least those who are paying any attention to the news regarding Egypt and the MILLIONS OF PROTESTERS) are wondering.

 

Here's the ultimate reason why Obama CANNOT side with the protesters and why he MUST continue to support Morsi (despite his lying-ass claim that he "won't take sides."  That is just BUNK and BULLSH*T!!!)  But don't take my word for it...  READ THIS:

 

 

FrontPage Magazine: Libyan Intelligence: Morsi, Muslim Brotherhood Involved in Benghazi

Copy of post with links:



According to a Libyan intelligence document, the Muslim Brotherhood, including Egyptian President Morsi, were involved in the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, where several Americans, including U.S. ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, were killed.

On Wednesday, June 26, several Arabic websites, including Veto Gate, quoted the intelligence report, which apparently was first leaked to the Kuwaiti paper, Al Ra’i.  Prepared by Mahmoud Ibrahim Sharif, Director of National Security for Libya, the report is addressed to the nation’s Minister of Interior.

It discusses the preliminary findings of the investigation, specifically concerning an “Egyptian cell” which was involved in the consulate attack. “Based on confessions derived from some of those arrested at the scene” six people, “all of them Egyptians” from the jihad group Ansar al-Sharia (“Supporters of Islamic Law”), were arrested.

According to the report, during interrogations, these Egyptian jihadi cell members “confessed to very serious and important information concerning the financial sources of the group and the planners of the event and the storming and burning of the U.S. consulate in Benghazi…. And among the more prominent figures whose names were mentioned by cell members during confessions were: Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi; preacher Safwat Hegazi; Saudi businessman Mansour Kadasa, owner of the satellite station, Al-Nas; Egyptian Sheikh Muhammad Hassan; former presidential candidate, Hazim Salih Abu Isma’il…”

It should be noted that these findings are unsurprising: the supremacism of prominent Brotherhood figure Safwat Hegazi is such that he publicly declares the Brotherhood “will rule the world“;  Saudi Mansour’s hate-mongering, pro-Brotherhood TV station repeatedly aired footage of the YouTube Muhammad movie inciting violence around the Muslim world; popular Sheikh Muhammad Hassan holds that smiling to non-Muslims is forbidden, except when trying to win them over to Islam;  and Sheikh Hazim Abu Ismail is simply an openly anti-freedom, anti-infidel religious leader.

As for President Morsi, a video made during the consulate attack records people speaking in the Egyptian dialect: as they approach the beleaguered U.S. compound, one of them yells to the besiegers, “Don’t shoot—Dr. Morsi sent us!”

Hat tips to all links.

Obama needs to be impeached and driven out of office!!!!

*******

Update  on 7/3/13 at 12:51 p.m.

See additional link:

Klein Online

EGYPT’S MORSI BEHIND MURDER OF U.S. AMBASSADOR? Intel fingers Muslim Brotherhood in deadly Benghazi attack

Violating Our Constitution

Pascal Fervor wrote an excellent essay over at his blog and has asked me to respond.  Well, his request caused a lot of thinking.   The answer that I was working on in the comment section of my former post became so long that I thought it might be better to make it a blogment (a comment that becomes a blog post).

First, I recommend that you read his post:


BELIEF In Sustainability: Sneakily Violating Our Constitution

Pascal is calling for a lawsuit against the government for violation of the First Amendment through the aberrant use of forcing "belief in sustainability" upon the American people.

sus·tain·a·bil·i·ty

/səˌsteɪnəˈbɪlɪti/ Show Spelled [suh-stey-nuh-bil-i-tee] Show IPA

noun

1.

the ability to be sustained, supported, upheld, or confirmed.

2.

Environmental Science. the quality of not being harmful to the environment or depleting natural resources, and thereby supporting long-term ecological balance: The committee is developing sustainability standards for products that use energy.

I have read and heard that several groups (e.g. ACLJ, various TEA Party groups etc.) which were targeted through blatant violations of governmental power by the IRS  have already filed lawsuits.

I agree with Pascal that the overreach of power being used by the current government includes misusing the sustainability mantra.  However, it appears to be an afterthought being revisited by the ObaMARXIST  BADministration now to either try and attempt to get his base of liberal loons back, and/or to draw attention away from all of the current scandals.  Obammy worries more about his so-called "approval rating" (which dropped 8 points recently) than about anything else.  Such a narcissistic attitude is really sad and truly dangerous for our nation.  But the handlers of this little puppet must also be worried at this point and will make Zero do anything to draw attention away from it all.


My reply to Pascal's post:


Pascal, I read your essay today and you make several excellent points!

You wrote, "belief in Sustainability is widely held in American secular government."

So true! When men fancy themselves as their own kind of little "gods," they think that they can convince us civilian "plebes" that man made global warming is real and that they need to do something drastic about it. I will take Lord Monckton's word for it (and a local weather meteorologist named John Coleman) who have debunked the man made global warming myth before I would ever believe the fools in Washington D.C. who want to use it as an excuse to spend more of the taxpayers' money.

The Bible tells us that the closer we get to the end times, the more storms, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes - you know - the "natural disasters" will occur. But then we learn of the HAARP weapon unscrupulously used by men in power which changes the weather in certain areas (sometimes quite drastically and for purposes unknown to some).  But to those paying attention we know that it is being done for evil reasons.

Your title, BELIEF In Sustainability: Sneakily Violating Our Constitution is also true.

 Their "green" religion is being used as an excuse to do so.

You also wrote:

"If you see as I see that secular forces are determined to finally obliterate all Judeo-Christian religions (which is the competition of the nascent state religion, or possibly with Sharia where there might be special set-aside agreements at least temporarily) by various and sundry means, by hook or by crook... "

Of course the radical liberal=socialist=communist=tyrannical government we now have is doing this...right out in the open! But only those who have eyes to see and ears to hear realize what is happening.  And, it is occurring at such an alarming rate it makes our heads spin in disbelief that they are getting away with so much criminality!

 I could spend hours on this topic! But I will site one thing that I saw (and was originally confused about) from years ago that shows the unholy alliance of radical liberalism and radical Islamism; as well as another more recent event that the media propaganda tried to pull off as "truth."

1. My original confusion over a sign that I saw during an anti-Israel rally back in 2005 held in San Fransicko [sic purposely] has now been solved. While I was trying to make sense of that sign which reads: Thank you S.F. Liberals...You Die Last", (photo at link). Questions and discussion regarding the absurdity of the controversy regarding the building of the  "Ground Zero mosque" were brought up in that 2010 post. No need to read through the entire post (unless you want to). But you can see my confusion regarding the sign when I originally wrote (back in 2005):

"Notice what the man holding the sign is wearing. Can you tell what image is on the other man's red t-shirt? What are your thoughts about such a blatant display? Comments?"

The second post within that thread includes comments questioning Obama's birth certificate (which has since been proven to be a forgery, I might add, but no judge will touch the subject). There is discussion about Obama's fanatical anti-American pro-Marxist ideology, and his pro-Islamist trend at play within his entire BADministration.

At first glance, one might think radical Islamism and communism cannot work together. However, what is currently happening in Syria (with the Russians siding with Assad and Obummer plus clueless Senators like McCain and Graham wanting to arm the rebels (a.k.a. al-Qaida!!!) is causing a huge rife between Putin and Obammy. Ozero looked so weak and it has been reported that Putin verbally wiped up the floor with him. How embarrassing...

Granted, Putin's support for Assad goes way back because Assad's tyranny is more secular in nature. Whereas Obama and his ilk want to support the "rebels" with arms  and they are more "devout" (a.k.a. terrorists) Muslims (the Brotherhood who are Shia - I think?) and want to inflict Sharia law there.

The Syrian threat, along with the usual Iranian threat all makes for a hot and dangerous stew of trouble in the Middle East; threatening Israel most of all.

All of these developments are not new for those Christians who read, study, and comprehend Bible prophecy.

In a previous post entitled We Are Witnessing Biblical Prophecy which was written back in 2005, the hotbed of hatred towards Israel has now ratcheted up to an extreme.

Excerpt:

Today, we are continually witnessing Biblical prophecy happening right before our very eyes!

As astounding as it was, the prophecies surrounding the rebirth of Israel did not stop with the declaration of Israel's independence in 1948.

Three thousand years ago God inspired King David to predict that the reborn nation of Israel would be immediately surrounded by enemies, including the Arab nations of Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon and Syria.

"For lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head. They have taken craftly counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones. They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance. For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee: The tabernacles of Edom, and the Ishmaelites; of Hoab; and the Hagarenes; Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek; the Philistines with the inhabitants of Tyre; Assur also is joined with them: they have holpen the children of Lot. Selah" (Psalm 83:2-8).

In this incredible prophecy, David described the modern states of the Middle East by naming the ancient nations that have now joined with the Palestinians in their attempt to destroy the Jewish state in the last days.

This ancient prophetic list of nations is fascinating, as it enumerates virtually every one of the nations in the Arab confederacy that oppose Israel's existence today:

Edom.........from Esau, brother of Jacob (Jordan)

Ismaelites...descended from Ishmael, son of Hagar (Arabs)

Moab.........son of Lot, (Jordan, east of Dead Sea)

Hagarenes....descended from one of the 12 sons of Hagar

Gebal........ancient Byblus, (north of today's Beirut)

Ammon........son of Lot, (capital of Jordan)

Amalek.......descended from Esau (southern Jordan)

Philistines..from Ham, (throughout Palestine, Syria)

Tyre.........a Phoenician city (Lebanon)

Assur........founded Assyria; (Iraq - Iran)

Children of Lot, Moab, and Ammon, (Jordan)

Ezekiel 35:1-5, 10 describes the coming judgment of God against these Arab nations, including Edom (Mount Seir) in Jordan because of their centuries-old hatred of the Jews.

[Go to this link and read it all! The Ezekiel prophecies are astounding!]


This leads us to my second point of discussion.


2. As Joel Rosenberg points out today in his: Analysis: Is Rouhani a Twelver”? Iran’s President-elect just thanked the Mahdi for his victory. once again our media of mass deception lied to us.

Rosenberg writes:

Despite the Western media’s insistence that Iran’s President-Elect, Hassan Rouhani, is a “moderate” and a “reformist,” the evidence is clear: Rouhani is actually a high-ranking Radical Shia cleric who fundamentally agrees with the terrorist and repressive policies of the Ayatollah Khamenei and has been faithful in supporting such policies. Rouhani’s son reportedly even committed suicide because of the shame he felt that Rouhani was so supportive of Khamenei’s evil ways. The central question I have been curious about since the rigged election is whether Rouhani shares the Supreme Leader’s eschatology. Namely, is Rouhani a “Twelver”? Does he believe as Khamenei does that the End of Days has come, and that the Twelfth Imam (or Mahdi) is going to appear at any moment to destroy the infidels and establish a global Islamic caliphate, and that Iran’s regime can and must hasten the arrival of their so-called messiah by annihilating America (which they consider the “Great Satan”) and Israel (which they consider the “Little Satan”)?

It may appear that I have gone off of the subject matter, so please forgive me. However, I think that the current evil stew of ideologies - including the use of "sustainability" in order to destroy our Constitution and the rights it contains for Americans that Pascal discusses; plus the obvious communist leanings of this BADministration, and last but not least, the obvious radical Islamist sympathizing and collusion all creates a mish-mash of hate against America and Israel.

All three evils explain why the ObaMARXIST BADministration is doing all that it can to destroy our Constitution and America as we know it.  The scandals involving the attack on the Bill of Rights may currently be seen as unimportant to those individuals and groups who were not targeted.  However, how do they know that the same thing won't happen to them in the future?  The suppression of all Conservative groups (that want to defend free speech rights, freedom of association, the right to bear arms, the right not to be subjected to illegal search and seizure and even more importantly, our freedom of religion (while encouraging the Judeo-Christian morals and values that the Founders used as a basis for our laws in America) is only the beginning of the tyranny to come against all American.  What's worse is that they are hell-bent on using all the power of this current big, bloated, misguided government to do so.

What is the purpose of it all?  CONTROL

What is the end-game?  DESTRUCTION

However, if we look more closely at the situation, we find that evil not only attempts to destroy all that is good, evil destroys itself too! 

Let's go back to the meaning of that sign that was spotted in an anti-Israel rally in San Francisco in 2005:  Thank you S.F. Liberals...You Die Last". 

History has taught us that evil regimes often collude, and then end up trying to destroy each other.  One example is when Nazi Germany colluded with the Communists of the Soviet Union, then split and went on to kill and destroy each other later on in the war.

Because sinful people do not abide by God's Word and often repeat the same mistakes from history, the same will ultimately happen between the unholy alliance of radical Islamism and communism of our current day and age. 

Why?

Because in the end, only one of these two evil ideologies will want complete control.

What it all amounts to is CONTROL.

And control in the hands of evil people in power is used to further the father-of-lies plans to steal, kill and destroy.

Jhn 10:10

“The thief does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly. - Jesus Christ

Isaiah prophesied:

Isa 44:6 “Thus says the LORD, the King of Israel, And his Redeemer, the LORD of hosts: ‘I am the First and I am the Last; Besides Me there is no God.

Isa 48:12 “Listen to Me, O Jacob, And Israel, My called: I am He, I am the First, I am also the Last.


Jesus fulfilled:

Rev 1:17 And when I saw Him, I fell at His feet as dead. But He laid His right hand on me, saying to me,[fn] “Do not be afraid; I am the First and the Last.

Rev 1:18 “I am He who lives, and was dead, and behold, I am alive forevermore. Amen. And I have the keys of Hades and of Death.

Rev 1:19 “Write[fn] the things which you have seen, and the things which are, and the things which will take place after this.
 
With all of the turmoil going on in the world, Christians still have the peace that surpasses all understanding because Jesus and His own (all who believe in Him and belong to Him in faith) win in the end:

Blue Letter Bible: Revelation 22


Hat tips to all links.

BHO Drone Policy: "Very Dangerous Stuff...Nowhere Justifiable Under Federal Law"

(Photo credit:  H/T Frank C. from Tea Party Community.)

Two topics today because I could not make a choice between them.

#1.  The BHO BADministration's leaked memo about the drone strikes on Americans. 

Fox News Channel has been all over this issue and rightly so!  This is an AWFUL violation of the U.S. Constitution and the rights of our citizens that are in the Declaration of Independence!!

What HUGE hypocrites BHO and his ilk are to have criticized former President George W. Bush for "enhanced interrogation techniques" against TERRORISTS; while supporting unmanned drone strikes on Americans who are "thought" (mind you, not arrested and tried before a jury of peers in a court of law) to be so-called "terrorists" (Now...who are they?  Opponents of the BADministration?  TEA Party Patriots?  Gun owners who hold to the Second Amendment rights? Conservatives expressing their First Amendment free speech rights and freedom of association and religion rights?)

If you are not ABSOLUTELY OUTRAGED by this, then you are not paying attention!


Please see these posts:

The Daily Caller

How drones and abortion both explain our ‘out-of-sight, out-mind’ psychology
 

 

*******

NoisyRoom.net

Judge Napolitano Tears Into Obama Drone Policy: ‘Very Dangerous Stuff … Nowhere Justifiable Under Federal Law’

 

*******

WH: Illegal Drone Killings are ‘Legal,’ ‘Ethical,’ ‘Wise’ Killer Obama: Judge, Jury, Executioner Obama Killed 3 Americans (1 Boy) Criminal Justice Dept Memo:Gov't Can Kill Americans

(Hat tip: Commieblaster)
If THIS blatant act - taking a dictator's tyrannical offense of outright killing of Americans - against the rule of law in the United States of America doesn't result in the impeachment of BHO, I don't know what it would take!!!!

*******

#2.  The second topic involves the Imam from the Ground Zero Mosque fiasco.  Please recall (and review) this original video that I had provided here back in 2010: Of Mosques and Men: Reflections of the Ground Zero Mosque

 

Now, see how this Imam misused funds collected for this Mosque:

Answering Muslims

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf Accused of Embezzling Millions from Mosque Fund

 

Excerpt:

 

 

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is the author of What's Right with Islam: A New Vision for Muslims and the West and the forthcoming Moving the Mountain: A New Vision of Islam in America. He is most famous for leading the Ground Zero Mosque campaign a few years back. And now he's about to be even more famous for how he handled the funds raised for the proposed mosque project.

I have to wonder, though, how Imam Rauf will be punished if he is found guilty. Will he be punished according to the Western legal system of the kufar, or will he demand to have his hand chopped off in accordance with Qur'an 5:38:

As for the thief, both male and female, cut off their hands. It is the reward of their own deeds, an exemplary punishment from Allah. Allah is Mighty, Wise.

 

I say that any Muslim who doesn't choose to be punished according to Sharia has forfeited the right to tell us about Islam.

 NEW YORK, Feb 5 (Reuters) - The head of a proposed mosque that was to be built near the site of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks in New York City was sued on Tuesday and accused of squandering millions of dollars in donations on lavish lifestyle perks for himself and his wife.

Continue reading:

Answering Muslims

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf Accused of Embezzling Millions from Mosque Fund

 

I refuse to put the face of the Muslim radical thief on my blog.

Hat tips to all links.

*******

Update:

More articles to read on this:

Fox News.com: NYC lawsuit: Former imam of mosque planned near ground zero misused donations to his charity.

Fox News.com: Donor claims ex-imam in NYC mosque debate misused gifts.

Benghazi Explained: Interview With an “Intelligence Insider”

An Intelligence Insider explains what REALLY transpired before, during, and after the Benghazi attack on September 11, 2012.  I sincerely hope that this insider shared this information with Congress.  I'm physically ill over this!!!  This is TREASON people!!  Those responsible are traitors to America!  And the media of mass deception is complicit in the continuing cover-up!!

Anyone who voted for BHO again should be TOTALLY ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES!!!!

~  Christine

*******

First link and copy of post:

Canada Free Press: Administration is engaged in a massive cover-up Benghazi explained: Interview with an “Intelligence Insider”

Copy of Part I post from Northeast Intelligence blog:

Comment on this article at Canada Free Press

 

By Douglas J. Hagmann

 

27 November 2012: This is part one of a multi-part interview with a government insider intimately familiar with the events that took place in Benghazi. In this part, he provides important background, and explains that this administration is engaged in a massive cover-up.

 

DH: It’s been a while since we’ve discussed Benghazi. What have you heard lately?

 

II: Before I answer that, I want to get a few things off my chest. Every politician, whether it’s a congressman senator, diplomat, or their spokespeople and the media are lying to the American public every time they call the location of the attack a consulate. It was not. There was absolutely no diplomatic consulate in Benghazi. None. Words are important here. They can create a wrong image, an incorrect picture of what was really going on. The property where our Ambassador and other Americans were murdered was a rented villa consisting of a primary residence with a couple of outbuildings behind the actual house. The reason they’re still calling it a consulate is to subtly divert any questions about our activities there.

DH: Let’s go over this again; exactly what was taking place at Benghazi?

 

II: As I said, the place where the attack happened is one of the largest, one of the most active CIA operation centers in North Africa, if not in the entire Middle East. It was not a diplomatic station. It was a planning and operations center, a logistics hub for weapons and arms being funneled out of Libya. Unlike the embassy in Tripoli, there was limited security in Benghazi. Why? So the operation did not draw attention to what was going on there

.

DH: So in reality there were no actual security issues?

 

II: Oh yes, there were, in Tripoli. Diplomatic cables show that. But it was for the embassy in Tripoli, the Ambassador and the diplomatic staff in general, not specifically for the Benghazi location for two reasons. First, the Benghazi location was a CIA operation, not a diplomatic one. Visible security at that location would draw unwanted attention there. They had to blend in. Remember, the villa was located in a somewhat residential area, sort of like the suburbs. Secondly, additional manpower was not needed there, at this CIA center, as the operation was already winding down.

 

DH: I know you’ve gone over this before, but let’s get into the specifics of the operation at Benghazi.

 

II: Good, I want to be clear. After Gaddafi was taken out, there was the matter of his weapons and arms that were hidden all over Libya, including chemical weapons – gas weapons. According to Obama and Hillary Clinton, we were in Libya to collect and destroy these weapons to make for a ‘safer’ Libya. That’s what they were telling the American public. That’s not really what was going on, though, and it seems like all of the other nations except the average American knew it. Anyway, you can find pictures and videos of weapons caches being destroyed, but that is strictly for the public’s consumption.

What was really happening, before Gaddafi’s body was even cold, is that we had people locating caches of weapons, separating the working from those that weren’t, and making a big show of destroying the weapons, but only the weapons that were useless. The working weapons were being given to Islamic terrorists. They were being funneled through Libya, crisscrossing Libya on a Muslim Brotherhood managed strategic supply route. In fact, Michael Reagan called it the modern day equivalent of the Ho Chi Minh Trail in a recent article he wrote, and he is correct.

 

The entire arms and weapons running operation was headquartered in Benghazi, The weapons were actually being shipped out of Libya from the port city of Dernah, located about a hundred miles east of Benghazi. That was the ‘choke point’ of the weapons being shipped out. Remember the Lusitania? Think in those terms, ships carrying weapons hid among ‘humanitarian aid.’ By the time of the attacks, an estimated 30-40 million pounds of arms were already transported out of Libya.

 

From there, the weapons were being sent to staging areas in Turkey near the Syrian border, for use by the Free Syrian Army and other ragtag terrorist groups to fight against Assad. The objective was and still is to destabilize the Assad government.

 

DH: Why Syria, why not Iran?

 

II: It’s both, but Syria is the primary target here for this operation. First, look at the bigger picture, look at the so-called “Arab Spring.” Who benefits and by default, who doesn’t? Who is the architect for what’s going on throughout the Middle East and North Africa? Whose agenda is being implemented? To specifically address Benghazi, though, look at the bigger picture here and what is trying to be accomplished.

 

The Obama administration is playing the role of Saudi Arabia’s private army. I think if Americans knew this, they would be outraged. Our service men and women are being sold out as mercenaries for the wants and desires of the Royal family, for the Saudi’s interests. It’s about religious dominance and oil. Who is really benefiting from, say, what’s going on in Egypt? Mubarek is out, and the Muslim Brotherhood is in. Who does that benefit? Saudi Arabia.

 

Look at what we see happening in Egypt. Destabilization. Do you think the Russians want that? Hell no. Syria is Russia’s red line in the sand, as you earlier wrote. If Syria is lost to the Muslim Brotherhood by the actions of Obama, Hillary Clinton and others in this administration, what happens? Well, it will have an adverse impact on Russia from a military standpoint. They will likely lose access to their Mediterranean deep water port in Syria, which is Tartus.

 

But think further – three dimensionally. Russia is still the world’s largest oil producer, and that’s Russia’s primary source of income. Then there’s Turkey, adjacent to Syria. A large amount of Russian oil and gas, consumed by the West, flows through Turkey, which is also a player in this operation.

 

So, the destabilization of Syria which is exactly what Obama and Clinton are trying to do, presents a direct military and economic threat to Russia. Assad at least has kept things in check in Syria. Can you imagine Assad being replaced by someone like Morsi? That would strike at the very heart of Russia’s economic health and military capabilities. Think of what’s at stake here. Do Americans want a regional war? World War III? Has Obama or Clinton asked the American people if this is what they want?

 

Make no mistake, we are doing the bidding for Saudi Arabia. The U.S., NATO and other allies are engaged in a proxy war with Iran and Russia.

 

What about Assad’s war crimes?

 

Assad is no angel, but don’t be fooled by the death toll attributed to him. Now this is important. Remember the first Gulf War? In the run up to Desert Storm, a young woman testified before the Human Rights Caucus – she only testified under her first name, which was Nayirah. Remember that she testified that Iraqi soldiers were taking infants from incubators in Kuwait, leaving them to die? Her testimony was supposedly confirmed by Amnesty International. Her testimony went viral, and every war hawk in the U.S. government cited her testimony, saying we needed to right the wrongs, the inhumanity. It was all one big lie!

 

After Desert Storm, it was revealed that Nayirah’s last name was Al-Sabah, and she was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States. Her testimony was part of a publicity campaign organized by Citizens for a Free Kuwait, which was run by Hill & Knowlton, a PR firm out of New York. People must learn the back story.

 

So we see a body count attributed to Assad. Who’s doing the killing, Assad’s people? Maybe at times, but the Free Syrian Army and other groups are doing most of the slaughter. It’s one huge ‘false flag’ operation and the media is selling it hard. And Americans are buying it, just like the testimony of the girl from Kuwait.

 

It’s one big lie being told by Obama, Clinton, Rice, and others. Many Americans are buying the lie, and the media is selling the lie. The people behind this are laughing at us. Don’t you get it? They’re laughing at us.

 

And do you want to know what’s at stake? Four Americans were killed in Benghazi. Forty thousand have been killed so far in Syria. Tens of thousands of Syrian people have become refugees. Why? For what? To advance the agenda of Saudi Arabia. For oil.

 

You know, the so-called right wing establishment were all up in arms about Obama’s submissive bow to the Saudi King. Where are they now? Where’ the outrage that the body count will be much greater than Forty thousand? It is anticipated that if the Obama plan succeeds, not only will America be committed to yet another war, but the body count could be as high as FOUR MILLION. Christians, among others, will be slaughtered. This could trigger a third world war, it’s that serious.

 

What is Russia and Iran doing? Certainly, they must be fighting back.

 

Benghazi was a strike against us, the Obama-Clinton agenda. A visible strike, and I’ll explain more about this shortly, because there are events I will point out that will put it all into perspective. But think of it this way. How did we successfully collapse the Soviet Union? I mean, what was the last straw? We attacked their currency – the Ruble. They’re still stinging from that, and Putin was in the KGB at the time. Do you think he forgot about that?

 

So, how does, or will Russia and Iran strike back if Obama and Clinton continue this insanity? Militarily? Possibly in regional conflicts, but to take us out, to stop us, what is the one area we are very vulnerable? It’s our economy – our dollar. What’s our dollar tied to? Not gold or silver anymore, and some say it’s not tied to anything. Well, that’s not quite correct. It’s tied to OIL. The free-flow of oil.

 

Oil transactions everywhere in the world, including Russia and China, are made with U.S. dollars. We buy their oil with our dollars, and they return with those same paper dollars and employ Americans by buying our goods and services. As Michael Reagan wrote: “[t]his system is also crucial to the security of our diplomatic and legal infrastructure, which is ultimately backed by our military. It’s the core of our foreign policy.” He also wrote that “any attack on the free flow of oil is an attack on the dollar. Any attack on the dollar is an attack on our ability to project power and protect Western democracies, economies, and ideals. God have mercy on us all if that attack is successful!”

 

END OF PART I

*******

Part II from Northeast Intelligence blog: Benghazi explained: Interview with an “Intelligence Insider” (Part II)

Copy of post:

Please comment at Canada Free Press

Obama does not want the American people to know the truth about what is going on, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, AQIM

By Douglas J. Hagmann

29 November 2012: Author’s note: This is part two of a multi-part interview with a government insider intimately familiar with the events that took place in Benghazi. It is important to note that the information contained in this series was developed from interviews that spanned over 100 hours. In this part, the insider provides information about the events of the attack and the continuation of the cover-up at the highest levels of our government. (For Part I, please click here).

 

We’ve heard different accounts and different timelines concerning the attack at Benghazi. What exactly happened?

 

First, people must understand that the compound that was attacked was situated in a somewhat rural area and was not a consulate, but a rented villa, or a residential structure. The residence was the primary building, and what has been referred to as the annex was located about 1800 feet away as the crow flies, but just over a mile to travel by road. And again, visible security was not present as the compound was the headquarters for a covert operation. No one wanted to draw attention to what was taking place at this location.

The first indications of problems there began at least twelve-(12) hours before the first shot was even fired. One of the men at the compound observed a policeman or Libyan security officer taking photographs outside of the villa. Keep in mind that Ambassador Stevens, the point man in this Obama-sanctioned weapons running operation, was hastily scheduled to meet with the Turkish consul general at this location. The meeting was deliberately planned for dinner time, toward evening, when the events that happened next could be performed under the cover of darkness.

 

It’s also important to consider the location of this meeting. Tripoli is the seat of power in Libya, and a genuine diplomatic meeting could more safely have been conducted there, at the embassy. Also, what most people don’t know is that Libya is split, much like East and West Germany before the wall. The eastern part is more closely aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood, the same group that controls Egypt. The Turkish consul general had to meet there, not just with Stevens but with other factions involved in this covert operation.

 

Now I’ll digress for a moment. It is reasonable to ask whether the Turkish consul general was setting Stevens up for a hit, like a classic mob-style hit. First, there is no dispute that there was surveillance done at 6:30 a.m. Next, consider that three hours before the first shot was fired, about 6:30 p.m. local time, some strange things were observed taking place near the compound. Military type vehicles began closing of the streets with trucks that had 50 caliber guns mounted on them. Checkpoints on the streets and at intersections were being quietly closed off around the compound. Nearby residents began going inside their homes. Anyone walking in the area got off the streets, like a scene from a movie in the Godfather series. It was obvious that the stage was being set for a strike against the compound. This alone reveals pre-planning and coordination.

 

It’s also noteworthy to point out that the Turkish counsel general most likely passed through one or more of these checkpoints, or at least would have noticed that things were not right in the area. You must remember that just as Stevens was CIA with diplomatic cover, the Turkish counsel general was his counterpart. It’s typical spy versus spy stuff.

 

Also consider this. One of the men stationed at the compound, a British national, left the compound at about 9:20 a.m., reportedly to get more phone cards. That’s right, phone cards, like you would buy at Walmart. Why? Because the men at the compound ran out of minutes. Just who do you think they were talking to that day to burn through the minutes, and why do you think they needed them at that exact time?

 

They were using the phones as a last and perhaps only line of communications to provide assessments of the strange things going on earlier. They knew that something was being planned and they were conveying that information – their observations to those who could assist them, in Tripoli and DC.

Based on these activities, it is clear that the men at the compound suspected that they were in trouble long before the first shot was ever fired. they were calling anyone who would listen, or who should have listened. We knew trouble brewing and no one responded in any meaningful way.

 

Could the man who left to buy more phone cards have known what was about to take place?

 

Well, it’s possible, but there is no indication of that.

 

Was the Turkish counsel general in on this, to set Stevens up?

 

Well, what have we heard from our government? Has anyone even bothered to interview him? What did he say? Don’t forget, this administration decided to handle this attack as a crime and not a terrorist attack. How long did it take for the FBI to be able to access the ‘crime scene’ after the attack? More importantly, what was left at the ‘crime scene’ to examine by the FBI due to this delay. Do you think the delay was accidental?

 

Do you know what was discussed, or the reason for the meeting between Stevens and the Turkish consul general?

 

Yes, I know some key points. First, keep in mind what this arms running operation was all about. It was to topple Assad and replace him with a Muslim Brotherhood leader. It was to destabilize Syria to advance the agenda of Saudi Arabia. They were using U.S. and NATO forces to do exactly that.

 

However, Assad is no Gaddafi, and there is no comparison between Assad’s army and the Libyan army. It would take much more than rebels inside Syria to topple Assad. There is no way on earth that the Syrian rebels, or Free Syrian Army, has the capability to accomplish this objective alone. It required U.S. assistance, arms and training.

 

Now, Turkey is a NATO ally. They were assisting the Obama-Clinton-Saudi plan to funnel weapons ultimately to Syria, but the primary staging areas for these weapons were in Turkey near the Syrian border. Visual surveillance by Russia, using satellites and other means amassed photographic documentation of the U.S. assisting the ‘anti-Assad rebels’ inside Turkey. They developed evidence of the U.S. training these rebels and assisting them into Syria to fight against Assad.

 

Think about this. What if surveillance images observed anti-Assad rebels being trained to handle and mount chemical weapons – gas shells – onto rockets? The process would be apparent and would obviously be detected by a number of visual indicators. Obviously, Syria wanted this to stop. By extension, so did Russia.

 

One aspect of the weapons plan was to set up a false flag operation to make it appear that Assad used chemical weapons against his own people. Imagine the outcry from the civilized world to the news that Assad ‘gassed’ his own people. That would be an invitation to NATO and the West to openly intervene. Don’t forget about the timing of all of this. Two months before the elections, and time was running out. The job of taking out Assad was not yet complete. Such an event would quickly advance this agenda. By this time, however, being caught and placed in a rather unenviable position between Russia and the U.S., the Turkish consul general was in a ‘CYA, clean-up’ mode, assuring that none of the chemical weapons that might have still been in Libya were headed for Turkey.

 

It is also important to understand that the covert weapons running operation was just about finished. An estimated 40 million pounds of weapons were already shipped from Libya, and things were winding down.

 

There was another issue as well, a very important and telling one. Seven members of the Iranian Red Crescent had been kidnapped or snatched from the streets of Benghazi on or about July 31, 2012. Again you must understand that virtually anyone walking on the streets of Benghazi not indigenous to the area are spies. Covert operatives, operating under various covers. From all nations.

 

Along with the message that the weapons running operation was compromised, the Iranians had good reason to suspect that the ‘Red Crescent workers’ were snatched by the CIA or with their assistance. Iran wanted them back. They were spies, and countries want their spies back! So part of the meeting was to address this, as there was pressure by Russia against a wavering Turkey to switch sides. Anyway, you’ll see how this ties in to the way the actual attack was executed.

 

Please continue.

 

So at 9:30 pm local time, the compound began to take on small arms fire. Based on all reports I’ve reviewed, there were three twelve-man attack teams armed with small arms, RPGs, and other sophisticated military style weapons. These were not run-of-the-mill street weapons, but military issued type weapons. The types of weapons alone scream that this was a preplanned attack.

 

Eyes on the area [author's note: satellites, surveillance drones] confirmed that two of these teams surrounded the villa and the annex. The third team was elsewhere, lying in wait. The two teams began their assault on the compound where Stevens was inside about an hour after the Turkish counsel general left. Remember, he had to pass the checkpoints after the meeting. Just keep that in mind.

 

Anyway, we all know now that there was an intense firefight that lasted nearly nine hours during which four Americans, Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Dougherty and Tyrone Woods were killed. And of course that attack was not over a video and there were no protests before the attack.

 

Now there are questions that are not being asked. The two well-armed ‘hit teams’ had the capability to reduce the compound and annex to rubble quickly. Why a protracted firefight? There are a couple of reasons.

 

First, what was the makeup of the ‘hit teams,’ or who were the attackers? We have verified that the attackers were a combination of members of Ansar al Sharia and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), but they were operating under the flag of Ansar al Sharia. Who is Ansar al Sharia? Iranian terrorists. They are a terrorist group that receives their training by and funding from Iran. Now think about this. Carefully consider the implications here. IRAN. It’s the elephant in the room no one wants to mention or talk about.

 

The attack on our ambassador and our people – Americans – was an attack by Iran. It was an attack at a nation-state level.

 

AQIM also assisted. They are indigenous to Africa and are extremely dangerous. AQIM is a very ‘elite’ and extremely well funded group, and very limited in number. Our last assessment suggests that there are only 400 or so members, but they are very influential across Africa and into South and Central America and Western Europe. Their importance and relevance will become evident shortly.

The reason that they did not just take out the compound and everything and everyone in it is that they were looking for their spies. Remember the Red Crescent workers? The Iranian spies? They suspected that they might be held at the annex. As such, they wanted to free them and did not want to risk killing them.

 

Oh, and there were others ‘missing’ as well. AQIM members. These were terrorists involved in drug running operations from the Tri-border (TBA) areas of South America through North Africa and into Western Europe. By the way, this is the way they made their money. Drugs sell at higher profits in Western Europe than elsewhere, so there is money to be made. The problem is that some of them got caught – snatched up in Benghazi and northeastern Libya.

 

Now regarding AQIM, this has a direct connection not only to South America, but also to Mexico and Mexican drug gangs. You think that what’s going on in Libya is just ‘over there,’ and far away from the U.S. and has nothing to do with our safety and security? Think again, but more on this in a bit.

 

There’s also another reason. The hit teams fully expected rescue teams from the U.S. to be dispatched to the compound. Certainly, calls for help went out. By waiting for the back-up or rescue forces, a surprise assault by the other ‘hit team’ team would have exposed our forces to possible causalities and turned the event into a much bigger event where the actual nature of the operation could be exposed to the world. Instead of being a cover-up for which they have yet to be held accountable, it would have been an international incident that would have exposed the entire affair.

 

So the Ansar al Sharia attack groups deliberately conducted a protracted assault on the compound. Just imagine, our men and even the bad guys never expected team Obama would leave our people twisting in the wind, fighting for their lives. That alone should speak volumes to every American.

 

As daylight approached, they had to wrap things up so they could disappear under the cover of darkness. Oh, and the crowds that are often cited by this administration, did form in the area as the attack progressed, much like a growing mob in riot. They provided the fog, or the cover, that permitted the attackers to escape amid the crowd.

 

You mentioned the missing Iranian Red Crescent workers and members of AQIM. Were they ever released or found?

 

Yes, and this is an extremely important part of this entire story. This reaches into the highest levels of our government. This is so very important that it must be addressed separately.

 

So the attack was first and the crowd came later. I noted that the administration said that there were protests going on at the Embassy in Cairo at the same time and they compared it to Benghazi.

 

Yes, that’s their cover story and they know that there is absolutely no comparison. This is one huge lie that is easily addressed and put out of its misery.

 

How soon did U.S. intelligence officials know who was responsible for the attack?

 

Almost immediately, if not concurrent with the attack. Every part of that area is under active aerial surveillance by the U.S. There was SIGINT or communication intercepts at the time of the attack. Then, there was even an admission by the attackers. Obama knew. Hillary knew. Clapper knew. Everyone knew, except the American people. And you know what? The American media knew as well.

 

I heard a statement that they did not admit knowledge to avoid alerting the perpetrators.

 

 

Yes, it was said that Rice and others did not want to alert the ‘bad guys’ or tip their hand or some such nonsense, but did that mean that Susan Rice, for example, had to appear on national television and lie to every one of us, to the country? In my opinion, Rice took on the temporary job of propaganda minister for a day in exchange for a shot at Secretary of State in the future.

 

You are painting quite a dire picture.

 

 

 

It gets worse, much worse, and it involves real threats across the globe and even to us here in the United States. But it’s all because of our actions, the covert weapons running from Libya to Syria by way of Turkey at the direction of Barack Obama and his Saudi ‘handlers.’

 

FORTY THOUSAND men, women and children are dead in Syria as a direct result of this attempt at nation building, or tearing down Assad. There are four dead Americans. We are arming some of the very people who are killing our troops. Not only are we on the wrong side of this, we are actively pushing the world to the precipice of World War III.

 

We are engaged in a real war here with Iran and Syria and by extension, with Russia and China. And we are being lied to about it every step of the way, and the lies are getting worse, but so are the attempts to stop the truth from getting out.

 

What do you mean?

 

What do you think the recent directive issued by Obama, the one you wrote about ‘insider threats,’ is all about? Obama does not want the American people to know the truth about what is going on. He’s doubled down to stop leaks, like this. But you know what? He just might be too late, because we’re not done here. I’m not done talking, and there’s much more that needs to be exposed.