Reggie Love and the Birth Certificate [Update]

Before I share the blog post title link, I wanted to state how interesting it was to see a brief segment of the "Reggie Love interview" on Fox New channel's "Special Report" yesterday.  During "The Grapevine" segment, John Roberts (subbing for Brett Baier) shared the fact that Love spilled the beans regarding Obama's actual location while the Osama Bin Laden raid was occurring; and unless Reggie is lying (but why would he???), Obama was in another room entirely, playing the card game called "spades" with his "body man" and others; rather than sitting in the situation room with the other BADministration phonies.



Recall how many people noticed that Obama appeared to be photo-shopped into the photo.  His head was too little to have actually been in the original photo.

Apparently, the original videotape of this particular Love interview has been taken down.  But too late!  It's still in circulation around the internet!  See Obama Release Your Records for the clip. 

When you watch the clip and turn up the volume, you here Reggie say, "When you're from Ke..."  you KNOW that he was about to say "Kenya."

Jack Cashill has written a piece about this incident over at American Thinker entitled, Reggie Love and the Birth Certificate.

Excerpt:

See also: What Reggie Love Had to Say about the Obama Birth Certificate by Nick Chase


Most of the talk about the recently released Reggie Love interview centers on Love's admission that he and President Obama played cards -- Sp***s to be precise -- during the Osama bin Laden raid. But Love, Obama's "body man" for several years, revealed more than the White House wanted him to about Obama's notorious birth certificate.

At a forum hosted last month hosted by the Artists & Athletes Alliance in Los Angeles, Love jovially recalled the moment when Obama "finally found" his birth certificate.

The moderator chimed in mischievously: "It took a little too long, by the way." Said Love in response, "Hey, when you come from . . . " before catching his thought and cutting himself off. 

Love then went on to explain the delay, saying that when "your parents don't live together (and) you travel all over the world, documents get lost." Although the Artists & Athletes Alliance has pulled the video, the highlights are available here.

 

Read it all HERE


*******

I find some of the comments there even more interesting and enlightening!

paul_vincent_zecchino

1. Maraniss has as much credibility as has Piers Morgan on the subjects of the Second Amendment and firearms.
2. Abercrombie, as does maraniss, sounds like a guilty suspect interrogated, telling long, rambling, conflicting, shifting, vague stories in vain hope of fooling investigators.
3. Does Love actually believe that when you move, the agencies which hold your Birth, Marriage, and other vital records lose them? Is he that uninformed?

If not, is he so cynical that he believes the majority of Americans would buy that tripe? Does this mean for example, that because my family and I moved from Rhode Island to Florida about twenty years ago, all our birth and marriage, etc. records were lost?

Do people believe this tripe?
And for goodness' sake, the Victim whining coming out of Abercrombie immediately tells us he's hiding the truth.
They're all so blatant.

 

*******

 

fb274                                                                                                                            

 

Mike Zullo-Arpaio's cold case posse just recently presented an affidavit to the court of Judge Moore (Alabama - the Ten Commandants judge). The affidavit is 57 pages in length documenting the extent of the fraudulent birth certificate and that it was ALL computer generated. They have expert witnesses who can testify accordingly,.
Zullo states they have traced the computer production to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.and a 'person of interest' in the production of same. A spokesperson indicated on August 12,2013 more information has been obtained in the last few weeks. Nope, the issue is not dead.
Rep. Stockman (per Rep. Yoho of Fl. in a recent Town Hall) is to present a bill in the House stating the document is a Fraud. In June Zullo met with the Sheriff's Association in Kansas and laid out his findings. This is a case of FRAUD which is a felony and has NO Statute of Limitations on same. Write letters (snail mail) to Stockman supporting this effort is requested.

Now, as to why these subjects, B.C. and bin Laden, were brought up again IMO is the WH team trying to deflects ALL of obama's "phony" scandals of Benghazi, IRS, NSA, Fast and Furious, gun running via Amb. Stevens actions to the islamist in Syria.

 

*******

 

Flavius_Maximus   re:  fb274                                                                        

 

The document examiner that performed the 40 page analysis for the Alabama Supreme Court case has an impeccable reputation...

He has even been used by Perkins Coie, Obama's personal law firm.

Which if the governments lawyers or his personal law firm were to try impeach his reputation would call into question their own use of his work would allow others to appeal on that basis alone in those cases.

So, they are definitely in a tight spot to say the least...his court appointed and qualified opinion is that the long form birth certificate copy is a digital made forgery...

And poorly done at that and resides on a government website a crime in and of itself...

Latest on this Case:
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013...

and

http://obamaballotchallenge.co...

In Liberty

 

*******

 

Flavius_Maximus                                                                                                                            

 

The story is even more sordid than Mr. Cashil paints:

"Just Google “Obama Sideshow” this simple phrase “sideshow” gave cover to what has become the single greatest HOAX ever perpetrated on the American people by a sitting president with the sole purpose to place a forged birth certificate on the White House website. I have dubbed it “Operation Sideshow.” My browser showed 5,252,000 hits for this search string, you are welcome to try to ascertain this for yourself. This is my favorite from the Huffington Post “Carnival Barkers Slam Obama’s ‘Sideshow’ Remark”; posted on April 28, 2011, the day after the release of Obama’s latest birth certificate."

Follow the link if you want to read about the in depth involvement of the Governor of Hawaii and numerous other state officials that all worked together to assist Obama in the placement of the forged long form birth certificate on the White House website.
This article discusses the people, the law and the facts...the Pineapple Express edition of this saga.
Operation Sideshow Part 5:
http://www.westernjournalism.c...
Operation Sideshow Part 6, Governor Abercrombie>
http://www.westernjournalism.c...
Note: Links appear at the bottom of each article for the other parts 1 through 11.
In Liberty
God Help Us...Molon Labe!

*******

One of the last comments (as of 8/16/13 @ 8:30 a.m. PT) asks the question, "What is a body man?  I want to know." 

I would suggest that the man reads the extensive report over at Hillbuzz for the answer to that question!!

Well people?  We all have a LOT of reading to do now don't we?

Also see: The Obama File.com

Glenn Beck makes additional observations about the "situation room" photo: Beck’s Fascinating Breakdown of the OBL Situation Room Photo — and How What Obama Doesn’t Have in Front of Him Is Incredibly Telling 

Hat tips to all links.

The Truth About ObamaFraud Is Getting Out! [videos and link added]

Don't let all of the scandals keep you from learning about the breaking news that PP Simmons Has Announced on his radio show: Law men and elected officials "SHOCKED" by new evidence. Obama Birth credentials fraudulently and criminally fabricated! Biggest FRAUD in US History!

Be sure to go to the link above and listen to the radio broadcast. Here is an excerpt from the blog:

Carl Gallups reported he had a telephone conversation with Mike Zullo immediately after Mike made his public presentation at the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Convention in St. Charles, Missouri, on the morning of Saturday, June 1.

According to Carl Gallups, Mike Zullo stated that the overwhelming response of the lawmen and elected officials is that of absolute SHOCK. Zullo said that "audible gasps" could often be heard during his presentation. He said that one official came up to him afterwards and said, "I have been purposely ignoring this matter - until NOW! I will ignore it no longer." Zullo reports that several constitutional officers, public officials, attorneys, elected officials, and others are now pledging full and personal support in moving this matter to a congressional investigation. Zullo says that the media blackout has kept many of these officials in the dark. He says most of them are now outraged - now that they have seen the evidence that they should have seen from the beginning. Now, Zullo is reporting, the media is being 'side-stepped.' "We are making inroads and contacts that we have never made before. This conference is really going to 'pay off' in moving things forward. Very important people are now beginning to see the amassed criminal evidence of perhaps the biggest fraud in American history. They are moved - they are shocked - and they are ready for action. Plans of action are now being laid at this very conference. This meeting could prove to be monumental."

Zullo continued, "The evidence in this criminal case is overwhelming and undeniable. The only identifying document that Barack Obama has ever presented to the American public is a 100% verifiable forgery and fraudulent document. It is a criminal offense to use fraudulent documents to gain political office - much less the office of POTUS and Commander-in-Chief. We knew that once we could get this information before the public, and especially lawmen, congressmen, attorneys, and legal officials - we could get the ball rolling on a congressional investigation. We have some shocked officials at this conference. Think of it - all these lawmen, lawmakers, and legal officials just saw the evidence - not one has challenged the legal credibility of what we have. The ball is now rolling."

Congressman Steve Stockman (TX) was the Keynote speaker at the convention last night. He too has now heard Zullo's presentation and more than likely will be in the private 'credentialed' presentation today as well. You might remember that Stockman has already gone on record threatening impeachment proceedings against Obama for unconstitutional matters regarding the Second Amendment. It is our understanding at PPSIMMONS that Congressman Stockman is very concerned over the matter of the Obama Fraud case.

Remember - this movement investigator Zullo is speaking of - is the result of the PUBLIC presentation only. The full PRIVATE presentation for lawmen and elected-officials-only (credentials checked at the door) will be made later on today. In that two hour meeting, Zullo, with full authority of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, pledges to reveal all the criminal investigation material they possess in this matter. We can only imagine the reaction and outrage that will ensue once these constitution loving, patriotic officials see the pile of criminal evidence. Mike Zullo and Carl Gallups have been promising for months that we would soon see some forward movement in this case. It is now happening.

Carl emphasized, "This Sheriffs and Peace Officers meeting was merely some icing on the cake. This was dropped in our laps just 5 weeks ago. We still have other VIPs and other plans being made now that are even bigger than what is happening at the Sheriffs Convention. This matter is finally going to be heard as it should have from the beginning."

Carl continued, "Very soon, certain members of the media, the courts, and congress are going to look very silly. They have been ignoring this, sitting on it, marginalizing it, and flat-out trashing the matter for years. They will soon be seen for what they are. This matter should have been investigated by Congress years ago. It is their constitutional mandate and they ignored it - purposely. This whole thing could have been resolved one way or the other years back. The media blacked it out. But we don't need the pundit media anymore. We are going around the MSM. We have other venues now. More and more, very important people of constitutional standing are being enlightened and coming on board. Soon, the world will know that we have been correct in this matter all along."

 

Read the rest HERE.

These investigators are going about  this the correct way.    It is interesting to note that the investigators will not prematurely press charges (what the Obots want them to do in order to ruin the case), but continue on until they get it to the point of a Congressional hearing on the matter.  Then this thing will burst wide open!

Another excerpt:

When asked about those who are DEMANDING that Arpaio and Zullo "press criminal charges now" - Gallups had this to say, "Look, those people do not know what they are talking about. Most of that talk is coming out of the Obot camp - so what does that tell you? They know that would be the wrong and premature thing to do. They know that if something like that was done now - the case would be lost - there would be jurisdictional and prosecutorial matters at stake. Mike Zullo has explained this in detail, time and time again.

"If the case were to be struck down because of a blunder like that - it might never come to a congressional hearing. The detractors know that - that is why they are trying to turn public sentiment towards filing criminal charges now. Anyone who claims they know what they are talking about and they are screaming for "criminal charges to be filed now" - be wary of them. They are up to no good. They are purposely trying to derail this case. Zullo and Arpaio are not that stupid. They know what they are doing. Arpaio and Zullo have almost 80 years of professional law enforcement experience between them. Arpaio has 30 years of federal law enforcement background. He knows how this game is played. This will soon be handled the way the constitution demands that it be handled. And when it is handled properly - it will stick!"

IMHO, many people who would like to speak out on this issue are afraid.  They have either been threatened personally, professionally,  or terrified into  silence by the thugs in the ObaMARXIST BADministration.  Others, (like Bill O'Reilly) have been brainwashed into believing that exposing the fraud of Obama is not worthwhile to pursue (for whatever reason).

However, the more officials on the local, statem and then national  level that are made aware of the fraudulent documents, the better the  case will be when it gets a hearing in Congress.

More blogs covering this event:

INFILTRATED NATION

Elected Officials "SHOCKED" by New Evidence-Obama Birth Credentials Fraudulently and Criminally Fabricated!

*******

The Steady Drip

Biggest FRAUD in US History! - Obama Birth credentials fraudulently and criminally fabricated! - Read More Here: http://ppsimmons.blogspot.com/2013/06/law-men-and-elected-officials-shocked.htmlLaw men and elected officials "SHOCKED" by new evidence. Ob...

 

*******

 

Citizen Wells

Obama fraud shocks law men at Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Convention, Mike Zullo presentations June 1, 2013, Biggest fraud in US history, Moving to congressional investigation - Obama fraud shocks law men at Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Convention, Mike Zullo presentations June 1, 2013, Biggest fraud in US history, Mo...

 

*******

Via Commieblaster:


Court-Certified Document Fraud Examiner: Obama's Birth Certificate is Entirely Fabricated

After 3-Hour Presentation to Rep. Stockman and Law Men, Stockmann Meeting with Obama ID Fraud Investigator Again ...Stockman Says, He's "Deeply Concerned" ...Investigator Says, "Nothing Can Stop Us Now"

Law Men, Elected Officials "SHOCKED" by New Obama Birth Credentials Fraud Evidence
Watch Video... Reveals Media Being Threatened Not to Cover the Fraud


 

Some Youtube videos to view:

Obama Doesn't Know His Own Birth Date!

OBAMA & THE WHITE HOUSE EXPOSE THE CONSPIRACY TO HIDE HIS IDENTITY

Hat tips to all links.

Videos you should watch:




Page you should read:

Commieblaster: PROVEN FACT! OBAMA INELIGIBLE TO SERVE

Treason, Fraud, and Obstruction of Justice within the Supreme Court of the United States?

Hat tip for photo:  Kevin D. at Tea Party Community

Found a new website called Red Flag News today and added it to my blog roll.

While reading posts at the site, I ran across this bombshell:

Red Flag News.com: Treason, Fraud, and Obstruction of Justice within the Supreme Court of the United States?

Copy of post:

Clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings regarding Obama Forged IDs & Eligibility, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief.   Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee of Congress...

Read the letter demanding an investigation to Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives.
 

Is there anyone in America (except, of course, the liberal left lunatics who support Obummer and his radical ilk no matter what!!) who is not alarmed, appalled and disgusted about this obvious obstruction of justice???

Political Velcraft.org: Press Release: Employees Of The Supreme Court Of The United States Caught With-Holding Legal Documents From Supreme Court Justices!

Excerpt:

Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee of Congress.

You can go to the link at Political Velcraft.org to read the entire letter written and send to Rep. Goodlatte.

Two comments there that help sum up exactly what (and why) President Abraham Lincoln warned us to watch out for the deliberate perversion of the Constitution by treasonous and evil elitists who might get into our government and suppress the truth (see the quote at the top of the page):

Comment #1:

Karol Hancock says:

February 20, 2013 at 5:28 AM

Anyone can go to http://www.supremecourt.gov at the bottom of the screen, look for “contact us”, this will take you to a page with phone numbers, address and email. You can leave an email, which they will receive today when they come in. It would be easy to flood the email and phone calls. We as citizens of America are entitled to request that our highest court review the information and hold a hearing on the same, that has been presented by Orly Taitz, Our Constitution says our President must be a “natural born citizen”, which means 2 parents that are citizens. Anyone running for the office of President of the United States, must provide proof of citizenship with a valid birth certificate and legal documentation, Social Security Number, Drivers License, Selective Services Registration. It is a known public fact, that all of Obama’s papers are forgeries. His birth certificate from Kenya has been located, it is in England, however, Obama has paid again to have it sealed. The Supreme Court can demand this be opened and England will abide. We must exercise our Constitutional rights and request or demand that the Justices of our highest court, The Supreme Court follow the Constitution that they swore an oath to.

Comment #2:

gigiregnier says:

February 19, 2013 at 11:56 PM

Orly Taitz’s, based on proof of his foreign birth, made it to the Supreme Court and there the clerks HID the records!!!!!!!!!! Call the Judiciary at 202-225-3951 , 9-6 eastern time, M-F
 

Hat tips to all links.

Liberal Establishment Media Try To Mislead Public

I admire the writer(s) at The Birthers website. Their main goal is defending the Constitution of the United States of America and they are "dedicated to the rebirth of our Constitutional Republic."

At the Founding of our nation, Benjamin Franklin was asked, "what type of government have you given us, sir?"

 The answer: "A Constitutional Republic...if you can keep it."

That dire warning is now a reality. Will we restore our nation back to what the Founders intended? Or will we go the way of so many nations that squandered their liberty, freedom, and justice for all by way of succumbing to the progressivism (a.k.a. liberalism, socialism, communism etc.) that the far leftists want to create in place of our Constitutional Republic?

Anyway, I really like what an author at The Birthers wrote today. I am passing it along here on Talk Wisdom because I think that the more educated the electorate becomes, the better the election outcome will be in November, 2012.

~  Christine

*******

Memo to GOP

Subject: How to shut the collective mouths of the liberal media and make your base happy you are defending the Constitution

Soledad O’Brien along with CNN et al are determined to help O’Bama even at the expense of the Constitution. Case in point as she berated Governor John Sununu trying to prove Obama’s eligibility, she made a fundamental error. She rhetorically asked the question “You don’t think it’s a big deal that person talks about the fact that the president of the United States is not a citizen of the country?”

However in this question she opened herself, and the whole liberal establishment who try to mislead the public, to positive correction and a lesson on the Constitution of the United States.

   

Sununu and any GOP representative should listen carefully for the adjectives “natural born” preceding the noun citizen. If they are missing, they should say that the Constitution does not require the President be a citizen, but a natural born citizen. “While I personally believe that Mr. Obama is a citizen a citizen of the United States due to his birth in Hawaii, history is unclear if he is a natural born citizen due to the very simple fact he was born a dual citizen. It is unclear because there has never been a Supreme Court decision stating that the child of an alien even though born in the United States is a natural born citizen capable of holding the office of President. If you wish we can discuss this as I am sure this topic is important to millions of Americans.”

This reply not only will cause them to flash the “We are experiencing technical difficulties” sign, but is 100% accurate.

No Supreme Court case has ever declared that the child of an alien is an natural born citizen, nor has the Supreme Court ever said that the child of aliens born in the United States is eligible to be president.

If we just consider post 14^th Amendment Supreme Court cases on the subject of who are natural born citizens and are the children of aliens citizens we find,

1.    No one doubted that the child of citizen parents born in the United States is a natural born citizen. 1875 Minor v. Happersett

2.   There were doubts that the child of aliens was a citizen even if born in the United States. Minor v. Happersett

3.   The children of aliens who are “domiciled in United States,” are 14^th amendment citizens. 1898 Wonk Kim Ark

4.   The child of American citizens born in the United States can be president. 1939 Perkins v. Elg

I am 100% positive the following will quickly occur.

This issue will quickly disappear from the media, and the conservative voters will think that you are pro-constitution, and the independent voters will respect you. Independents by their very nature are free thinkers and would appreciate a truthful presentation from both sides on this debate.

Hat Tip: The Birthers.org

P.S.  I thank The Birthers.org for linking to Talk Wisdom!

Sheriff Arpaio's Long-Awaited Press Conference [Updates]

Today is the day that Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse reveal much more evidence about Obama's fraudulent birth certificate and possible ineligibility to be POTUS.  I have written "possible" ineligibility because if Obama Sr. isn't his biological father (and the real father is either Frank Marshall Davis, Malcolm X, or even "pops" Dunham) then, in this particular matter he may only be guilty of the biggest fraud against the American people in the history of our nation for lying about his true identity.  Of course, if you have ever visited Commieblaster.com, then you will be educated about all of the evil, fraud, deaths, illegal activities, hatred of America, and all the rest of the nefarious activities that Obama and his ilk are guilty of!

The link below will provide you access to the live broadcast (and hopefully the video of the entire event if you can't see the live broadcast) to the announcement of what Sheriff Arpaio and his Posse group have learned since the March 1, 2012 press conference.

We the People of the United States

Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Long-Awaited Press Conference (Open Thread) - © Miri WTPOTUS July 16, 2012 Tomorrow is a day we’ve been waiting for, when Sheriff Joe and his Cold Case Posse release the “breathtaking” information uncovered...

Also see:

Why Obama's College Records Matter

at American Thinker - 11 hours ago

Questions about Obama's records tend to go over like fingernails on a chalkboard among the mainstream media.

Update:

Additional links:

Arpaio Reveals findings from Hawaiian investigation – Concludes Obama’s BC is “Undoubtedly Fraudulent” (Video)

nicedeb at Nice Deb - 46 minutes ago

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio announced at a press conference earlier today, that his investigation into the validity of President Barack Obama’s birth certificate had come to the conclusion that the document presented to the American public in April 2011 is undoubtedly fraudulent. HA officials would not confirm to investigators whether or not the BC [...]

*******

INFILTRATED NATION

BREAKING NEWS: THE 6 THINGS REVEALED IN THE ARPAIO OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE

*******

Klein Online

NOW ‘INDISPUTABLE PROOF’ OF OBAMA FORGERY: Live-streamed event features latest revelations of Sheriff Joe’s Posse

*******

WND EXCLUSIVE Arpaio Obama probe finds 'national security threat' Hawaii found to be bogus birth-certificate factory

*******

To view the entire news conference, go to my friend Steve's blog, read his post, and scroll down to the comment section to views the video there.

*******

Drudge is reporting it:

Drudge Goes There…. Sheriff Joe: “Obama’s Birth Record ‘Definitely Fraudulent’ (Video)

Jim Hoft at The Gateway Pundit - 3 hours ago

Drudge Goes There…. Sheriff Joe's Obama probe finds 'national security threat'... Calls Congress to move on eligibility... VIDEO: 'Every document surrounding Obama plagued with problems'... “This document has been tampered with.” The AP reported: Investigators for an Arizona sheriff’s volunteer … Continue reading →

Also, consider what this commenter at Gateway Pundit has to say:

#9 July 18, 2012 at 6:58 am workingclass artist commented:

Romney should not release any additional tax returns until Obama releases all of the documents he has hidden.

Obama/Dunham marriage license — Not released (if one exists)

Original, vault copy birth certificate — Not released (lawyers’ fees greater than $4,000,000 — a REAL birth certificate is $15)

 Certification of Live Birth (short form) — Released — Counterfeit

Certificate of Live Birth (long form) — Released — Counterfeit

 Amended Certification of Live Birth — Released — Counterfeit

 INS air travel records August 1-7, 1961 — Missing

  Obama/Dunham divorce — Released but incomplete (by independent investigators)

 Obama Sr. INS file — Released — both U. Hawaii and Harvard wanted him expelled for “womanizing”

Barry Dunham/Obama Kindergarten records — Records lost (this is a big one — read two frames)

Soetoro/Dunham marriage license — Not released

  Anna Soetoro/Dunham passport records — Released, but key years are missing

Barry Dunham/Obama/Soetoro passport records — Missing

Soetoro adoption records — Not released

  Fransiskus Assisi School School application — Released (by independent investigators)

Besuki School record — Released (by independent investigators)

Punahou School application — Missing

 Punahou School records — Not released

Noelani 3rd Grade records — Not released

Soetoro/Dunham divorce — Released (by independent investigators)

Selective Service Registration — Released (by independent investigators) — Under suspicion

Social Security Numbers — Released (by independent investigators) — Under suspicion

 Occidental College records — Not released

Financial Aid Records — Not released

Passport Records — Not released and records scrubbed clean by Obama’s terrorism and intelligence adviser

 Columbia College records — Not released

Columbia thesis — “Soviet Nuclear Disarmament” — Not released

 Harvard College records — Not released

Harvard Law Review articles — None

Illinois Bar Records — Not released

 Baptism certificate — None (never baptized)

Medical records — Not released — nor is the source of this nasty scar

Illinois State Senate records — None

Illinois State Senate schedule — Lost — really!

Law practice client list — Not released

University of Chicago scholarly articles — None

Rashid Khalidi video — Hidden by the L.A. Times

  White House Visitors list — Incomplete to the point of worthless

The Blagojevich Interview — judge denies access to the FBI report

The Osama bin Laden photos — sealed by Obama

The Fast & Furious documents — Executive Privilege invoked

  The Illinois State Archives told Judicial Watch that they never received any request from Senator Obama to archive any records in his possession. In 2007, Obama told Tim Russert that his records were “not kept.”

Hat tips to all links.

Obama's Birthgate

WOW!! A new post over at American Thinker concerning The Morphing Obama Biography and the Skeptics has to be one of the best I've ever read about the controversy! Please visit the link to read the whole thing. LOTS of links to corroborate the excellent and truthful points that author Cindy Simpson makes within the article!  Here's the most intense portion:

Want to see Obama's college transcripts? That's a hint at affirmative action -- racist. Wonder whether he attended as a foreign student? That's birther. Want to know more about Obama's religious beliefs and his relationship with Jeremiah Wright? Racist. Note that experts assert that the posted birth certificate is a probable digital forgery, or wonder if the White House was playing games in presenting such a strange document? Birther. Ask whether Obama wrote his autobiography? That's racist and birther. Vote for the blank box instead of Obama in the Democratic primary? Racist. Note that Obama and his attorneys ignored a court-issued subpoena, an Obama attorney asserted in a courtroom that even Mickey Mouse didn't need to show a birth certificate to run for president, and that the media didn't cover any of it? How birther.

In the same segment that Rivera blasted "birthers" for being "racist," he interviewed Lord Christopher Monckton, who has openly acknowledged the birth certificate anomalies. In between snorts and laughter during Monckton's explanation, Rivera insinuated that Monckton and his forensic experts were "smoking crack." And another of Rivera's guests, NYU professor Charlton McIlwain, implied that any questions of Obama's history and credentials were motivated by racism.
Journalists who pursue "facts and data," even while insisting they aren't wearing birther spectacles, are discovering that the mainstream media still depicts them as bottom-feeding "spawn," "aiding and abetting birtherism."

When the media finally did cover the agency biography story, they asserted that it had been "discredited" and then used it to bash Romney. None dared touch the fact that the agency updated the original 1991 biography several times for changes in Obama's career over the 16 years, yet did not revise the "born in Kenya" part (or downgrade the job descriptions of his parents) until 2007, two months after Obama announced his candidacy.

The biography story is radioactive: it addresses the taboo subject of Obama's birth, his life narrative, and his character and credentials, and it illustrates the mainstream's utter lack of journalistic integrity.
And if the clicks on your mental Geiger-counter are tap-tapping rapidly in agreement after reading that, you've been exposed to non-reversible birtherism radiation.

Skeptics, like business owners reviewing the job application of a prospective employee, are not satisfied with the glossy media photo and indulgent autobiography. They're also looking for the missing link in Obama's evolution from a college radical, Jeremiah Wright church member, and community organizer into a pragmatic moderate.

Obama responded to the questions with taunts -- in speeches, comedy routines, and prayer breakfasts -- and his campaign profited by selling birth-certificate-emblazoned t-shirts and mugs.

Some might argue that a little biography padding is expected, but redrawing family trees with a Cherokee branch or moving the birthplace to a more exotic location seems to work only in certain elite circles.

And the same newspaper that is still hiding the Khalidi tape has now added another new term to the lexicon -- transcripters -- to describe people who want to investigate the "tomb-like silence around [Obama's] college years."

Obama's "blank screen" evolved along with his political career, and when inconvenient facts got in the way, out came the media edits and erasers. If anyone dares notice any missed spots or erasure smudges, he or she is racist, birther, or distracted from the economy. And no one is allowed to wonder if the chalkboard mess has anything to do with the economic mess.

"Four years in office is what I call vetting," columnist Eugene Robinson asserts. Others would call the four years a disaster.

Fretting over the media's ties of Romney to Trump (with his "discredited" birther claims) but not Obama's to Sharpton, Breitbart's John Nolte wrote:

These are the games the media intends to play throughout this campaign. This is all about getting Obama reelected with distractions, guilty-by-association, and nonsense narratives that suck all the oxygen away from any conversations surrounding Obama's failed policies.

The "birther" issue has not been "discredited" -- what has been discredited is the reliability and reputation of the mainstream media. And the oxygen that Nolte worried about getting sucked away has accumulated right next to the explosive truth of the flimsy, morphing, media-supported Obama narrative.

If Watergate taught us that the cover-up is worse than the crime, the current affair would be better-described by a word coined with the "-gate" suffix than by "-er." Involving more than a birth story, it reaches across the entire narrative. And this time, instead of the mainstream media doing the investigation and reporting, they're actually assisting in the construction and the cover-up.

So which is it: Birtherism or Narrative-gate? The answer depends on which "field guide" you follow -- one written by the "Democrat-Media Complex," or one that asks questions to lead to the truth.

Hat Tip: American Thinker

Is The Fix In For 2012 Election?

Do readers here recall the trashing of the White House that occurred before President George W. Bush took office in 2001? Apparently, Clinton's liberal leftist goonie staffers hated the fact that Bush won the Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore, so they did the following:

In response, White House press secretary Ari Fleischer outlined the details of the damage, most of which was in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building adjacent to the White House. On June 3, 2001 The Washington Post quoted Fleischer as saying that the damage included the removal of the letter "W" from 100 computer keyboards, five missing brass nameplates with the presidential seal on them, 75 telephones with cover plates missing or apparently intentionally plugged into the wrong wall outlets, six fax machines relocated in the same way, ten cut phone lines, two historic door knobs missing, overturned desks and furniture in about 20 percent of the offices, obscene graffiti in six offices, and eight 14-foot loads of usable office supplies recovered from the trash. According to Fleischer, there was one incident in the White House itself, a photocopy machine that had copies of naked people hidden in the paper tray so they would come out from time to time with other copies.

I suspect that if Obama loses re-election, all hell will break lose at the White House and around the country. The meme of "racism" and the hatred spewed against Conservatives, TEA Party Patriots, and the Republican candidate who runs (and prayerfully wins!) in 2012, would make the destruction of the White House Clinton staff look pale in comparison.!

Is it the fear of race riots across America that keep the media of mass deception from reporting on the Obama ineligibility investigation being done by Sheriff Joe Arpaio and the Cold Case Posse? Or is there more (much more!) at play?

My blogging friend Steve over at Cry and Howl led me to an interesting article at Before Its News that exposes the demagoguery that was used to get Obama elected in 2008.

And a demagogue is defined as, “a person, especially an orator or political leader, who gains power and popularity by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people.”

This time around, I think that the ObamaBorgBots will need to continue to use the "prejudices of the people" in order to get the clueless minions to vote for the fraud again.

I heard on Fox and Friends this morning that the Obamafraud campaign is searching for a new slogan. The failed "hope and change" turned into "dope and chains," so they can't use that again.

While over at Before It's News, I ran across another article that was apparently written by the long-winded Orly Taitz, called New movement around the country is going viral: people are not showing up in court and saying, if Obama did not show up and the judge did nothing, why should we show up in court. New form of civil disobedience to end the occupation of this nation by the usurper.   [Note:  above is safe link!!]

I would caution readers from clicking on Taitz's site (which is included in the text at link above) because when I did, my Norton antivirus blocked a malicious attack on my computer!

Anyway, Taitz is not someone that can be completely trusted. It is hard for me to say that because of all the work she has done to draw attention to Obama's ineligibility, but her antics in the courtroom of the Georgia case looked suspicious to me. As we all know by now, the judge in that case ruled (most likely threatened to do so) in favor of the defendants (Obama and lawyers) who didn't even show up at the hearing!! Thus, we have the new "civil disobedience" going on in court cases as a result.

Hey - if Obama doesn't have to show up and not be held in contempt of court - why should anyone else show up for their court cases? Brave people! But SOMETHING must be done to break the media of mass deception silence that is currently going on to protect the usurper!

World Net Daily has reported that Ex-Communist Nations expose Obama 'fraud' Amid U.S. media blackout, foreign press sounds alarm on 'largest scandal in American history'

I checked out some additional old links: African Press: REVEALED: President Obama is a lucky man – The Kenyan born ruler of the American people.

But when I clicked on the one that had the html listing of an article that read:

africanpress.me/2008/10/30/obamas-grandmother-banned-by-the-kenya-police-from-giving-interviews-that-may-jeopardise-obamas-presidential-victory-on-November-4th/”

I reached a completely unrelated article: Boni down to 2nd division as Paul Oyuga may move up!

What is THAT all about?

Was the previous article scrubbed?

It was an article that was originally posted on 10/30/2008. And even the title is damaging! (Read: obamas-grandmother-banned-by-the-kenya-police-from-giving-interviews-that-may-jeopardise-obamas-presidential-victory-on-November-4th).

It is also interesting to note that Orly Taitz' recent article stated this interesting information:

There is a person who has written a book and went into details about Obama’s Vatican funds. Miki Booth She is in facebook contact her. I can tell you my insider in the White House said Michelle bought 3 houses in Kenya one for Her one for her mother and one as a Vacation Villa. Obama is taking flying lessons on Airforce one and there is an article in one of the Kenyan Papers that says Obama was born there and mentions the real birth certificate.

Might be wise to verify whether or not any of this could be true. If it isn't, then Taitz should never be trusted again.

These days, more than ever before in the history of our nation, we must follow Ronald Reagan's admonition to "trust but verify."

Sheriff Joe Arpaio is being sued by the Obama Administration on the Arizona immigration law.

Coincidence?

 I don't think so. 

Sheriff Joe is on to them and refuses to back down on the fraudulent documents that have been put out regarding Obama's COLB, his selective service document, and the questions about his social security number(s).

Looks like EVERYBODY is hiding from the eligibility issue!

Recall when Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas stated that "we are evading that issue?"

Well, it appears that the GOP candidates are hiding, too!

Klein Online

Arpaio: GOP candidates ‘hiding’ from eligibility. ‘I’ve talked to every one of them; I don’t see anybody talking about this’

Last, but CERTAINLY NOT LEAST, YOU MUST HEAR THIS VIDEO AND MAKE IT GO VIRAL!!!

Patriots Heart Network: Michael Savage: How Obama fixed 2012 election

PEOPLE!  Pay attention to election fraud. There is no greater topic of importance!
Sheriff Arpaio and his investigation MUST be successful to expel the usurper before the 2012 election!

Hat Tips to all links.

Confirmed: Obama's Birth Certificate Not Authentic

At least ONE local news station had the courage to report on the Sheriff Arpaio/Cold Case Posse investigation, news conference and conclusion:



See the official report:

SHERIFF'S OFFICIAL REPORT ON OBAMA'S FRADULENT BIRTH CERTIFICATE.

The Case of Obama’s Ambiguous Birth Narrative

I have been writing about Obama's ineligibility issues for years. But with the release of the so-called "long form birth certificate," in April, 2011, Obama and his cronies probably had hoped to put the issue to rest. Well guess what? The release of that document has only heightened the interest in solving the true story of Obama's birth narrative.

The alleged "Certificate of Live Birth" has been shown to be a forgery - by many experts in the field of determining the authenticity of birth documents!

Perhaps SOMETHING will be finally be done about this after Sheriff Joe Arpaio [read details at first link above] releases the findings tomorrow that he and his Cold Case Posse have accumulated over the course of several months' worth of investigation into Obama's mysterious records. Two important blog posts to read before tomorrow:

1. Cry and Howl: Sheriff Joe to Release Findings About Barack Obama March 1, 2012. Be sure to click on and read the two links provided at the Cry and Howl blog!

2. The Daily Pen Blog spot: Vital Records Indicate Obama Not Born IN HAWAII HOSPITAL (PART 2)

Even though I have been following this issue for some time now, the following important information was brand new to me:

THE LEFT MARGIN

Many have wondered why the left margin of the image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” is curling away under a digital “clipping mask”. An obvious explanation used by Obama’s defenders is that it was copied from a book of bound certificates in the main office of the Hawaiian department of Health.

However, this explanation does not explain two very significant facts about the image which, when considering vital statistics reporting methodology, render the certificate image a fraudulent document unqualified to determine the eligibility of Barack Obama to be President.

First, the overlay of what appears to be security paper was used around the visible part of the document image to conceal the lower portion of the document which contains birth metrics, health information and coding guidelines about the specific circumstances of the birth and the child’s biography after birth. For example, the author of this story has an original birth certificate which contains notations in this portion of the document indicating a change in paternity five years after his birth.

More importantly, however, the left margin of the document is not visible because the forgers wanted to conceal the codes scribed in that area. A few of these numbers are visible. However, the ones that are only partially visible or concealed are the ones which reveal the codes reported about the location and circumstances of paternity of the birth.

The numbers 6, 2 and what looks to be the flourish of a 5 appear next to the entry boxes for parental information.

The possibility of the presence of a “5” in this location has foreboding implication with regard to Obama’s birth. According to the Vital Statistics Instruction manual, this code means “Other” with regard to “Type of Location of Birth” – Code Outline shown here:

Essentially the presence of this code in any case is an indication of a Place of Birth other than a Hawaii Hospital and other than by a Hawaiian Medical Doctor.

The presence of the “6” next to the “Place of Birth” item is most troubling. As the second digit of the number 56, the 1961 VSIM uses the number 56 to code the location of births which occur outside of the United States but which are processed “in conjunction with” the county of registration. The states and the District of Columbia are numbered in alphabetical order from 01 to 51 while Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and the Panama Canal were 52 through 55, respectively. This left the number 56 as the code for classifying “Remainder of the World”. This can be found in the 1961, 1962, 1968, 1977, 1993 and 1999 versions of the VSIM. In 1993, number 55 became the code for New York City because of its large birth volume it was classified as its own major birth rate statistical reporting area.

Essentially, this means the code tape file contains two spaces for the state to record a geographic code for the foreign location of the occurrence of the birth without showing that location on the certificate for a resident mother.

The presence of a “2” is probably the second digit of “12” which is the indication of the VSIM geographic code for Hawaii as the state of the Mother’s “Usual place of Residence”.

There is MUCH, MUCH MORE EVIDENCE THAT SHOWS HOW THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A FORGERY AND HOW THE PURPOSEFUL ELIMINATION OF THE LEFT HANDED MARGIN WAS DONE TO DECEIVE THE PUBLIC!!!


Note this portion:

WHAT THE EXPERTS SAYUpon analysis of Obama’s alleged “Certificate of Live Birth” image by former Social Security Administration record investigators consulted for this report, artifacts appearing on the document indicate this document is not a reliable source of identity verification. They provided this assessment for our report:

“Mr.Johannson,

Thank you for inquiry regarding the contents of the document image you submitted on February 8th, 2012. We are familiar with the controversy surrounding this particular document and have included our best possible evaluation without access to the corroborating information.

ITEM 1: The image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” posted to the internet in April, 2011, contains handwritten (penciled) numeric and alphanumeric characters which confirm that preliminary coding marks were applied to the document.

On authentic certificates filed by the Health Department, these penciled notations were used on the original, paper version of the record kept by the State-level office of the Department of Health after a photo static copy was provided for medical record archives to the facility shown on the certificate. Moreover, they were applied to even-numbered certificates in 1961, which were those from which statistics were reported to the National Center for Health Statistics. Typically, they are not found on an original certificate which was prepared by an attending medical authority present at the live birth event because the medical personnel do not report natal statistics, the state registrar’s office does.

Therefore, an official copy of the hospital version of this same document in coordination with the code file tape created by the National Vital Statistics office will confirm whether the birth information is accurate between the four agencies who processed it, including the local registrar office, the state registrar, the hospital and the U.S. Vital Statistics office in the appropriate reporting region. All should have copies of this record.

If Obama’s birth occurred in 1961, it would be subject to the NCHS reporting methods and coding for that year. Therefore, his birth statistics would have been tabulated in the State office but not necessarily recorded and published by the NCHS statistics report. However, if the tape file record of his birth were discovered in the NCHS tape file archive, this would be contradictory to what we have been told about his birth.

Therefore, according the SSA panel, it is unlikely the certificate would not have been coded with preliminary notations in 1961, since vital statistics were coded from microfilmed images and translated to punch cards which contained approximately 150+ digit spaces for each birth registration. These cards were tediously completed, in blocks of 20 birth records, with a majority of the records being required, by contract with the NCHS, to be completed by July 31st of the following year.

Beginning in 1960, punch cards were hand-fed into a scan machine and the resulting data was then stored on a magnetic tape reel by the NCHS. According to the official U.S. Vital Statistics System Development handbook, this procedure required several hours for each record and was in effect under Hawaii’s contract with the NCHS until 1971.

ITEM 2: It is important to remember that births are just one of four types of more than 40,000 vital records which required processing, copying and filing in Hawaii. State vital records registration officials simply could not afford to spend time applying preliminary handwritten codes to vital records which were not going to be included in the annual reporting block.

Adding to the challenge, unlike today’s electronic system, the initial coding process was manually performed in 1961. With more than 40,000 records in need of processing and microfilming, why would a municipality waste resources to do unnecessary accounting? The resources were simply not available to do this for all the births, deaths, marriages and divorces in the time frame required, so the even-numbered reporting method was introduced. Besides, the NCHS contract with the states paid only a few cents per record to the (state) Health Department. If these penciled numbers appear on a vital record, the content of that record was reported as part of the even-numbered certificates to the NCHS as required.

Based on this, it is conclusive that Obama’s certificate number is either fraudulently assigned by forgers, or it was changed to an odd number after the original contents of the document were entered in order to prevent inquiries into Obama’s record file tape. Under either circumstance, information about Obama’s birth is being intentionally obscured in order to hide his actual natal history and the negative impact it would have on his eligibility to be president.

It is our recommendation that the identity of this individual, including his natal history, as well as all major forms of primary identification including social security number, education records, licenses and travel records be formally and thoroughly investigated.

Best Regards,


Records and Claims Investigations office
Social Security Administration

Based merely on the fact that Obama’s stated father, as shown in the image of this alleged 1961 Certificate of Live Birth was not an American citizen, Obama is not eligible to president of the United States. However, the NCHS coding and vital statistics reporting methods have left more than ample artifacts to formally investigate the truth about this most ambiguous shell of a man.

Perhaps it’s time for America to embrace the truth, engage the consequences of this deception and lies and, then…move on.

GO Read it all at The Daily Pen Blogspot.

Hat tips to all links.

Georgia and Birthright Citizenship

There are several links included within American Thinker's author, Cindy Simpson's article, Georgia and Birthright Citizenship that everyone who has been following the Georgia Court eligibility issue should read. It is concise and on point in every aspect of this case.

One of the most important links to read is:

Liberty Legal Foundation.org: Appeal of Georgia Eligibility Ruling.

Excerpt:

One of those motions is an Emergency Motion for Stay and Preliminary Injunction prohibiting the Georgia Secretary of State from including candidate Barack Obama on the Georgia Presidential Primary ballot. Read the filing on our website. Quoting from the motion,
“should this Court incorrectly deny this motion it would confirm that the judicial branch is now unwilling to enforce the clearest and most basic requirements of the U.S. Constitution. Harm to Petitioner that would result from such incorrect refusal to grant this motion represents nothing less than the loss of our constitutional form of government for all Americans.“

Our 15 page Appeal, available on our website, argues that the decision of the OSAH court:

1. violated Rules of Constitutional Construction,
2. misapplied Minor v. Happersett,
3. ignored the clear definition and precedential status of Natural Born Citizen in Minor,
4. ignored the Minor Court’s discussion of other categories of citizens,
5. ignored the Minor Court holding that the 14th Amendment “Did Not Add to the Privileges and Immunities of a Citizen”,
6. applied dicta from Wong Kim Ark instead of precedent from Minor, and
7. relied upon the severely flawed Indiana state court ruling, Arkeny v. Governor.

The OSAH decision concludes that any person born within the United States, regardless of the citizenship or legal status of their parents, is a “natural born citizen” under Article II of the United States Constitution. This conclusion runs contrary to common sense, violates venerable rules of Constitutional Construction followed by the U.S. Supreme Court since its inception, and violates the explicit holding of the Supreme Court case relied upon.

Had the drafters of the Constitution intended all people born in the U.S. to be considered natural born citizens, the 14th Amendment would not have been necessary. Had the drafters of the 14th Amendment intended that Amendment to alter the Article II definition of natural born citizen, they would have clearly stated so. Yet the term “natural born citizen” is not found anywhere within the 14th Amendment. The Amendment also makes no reference to Article II. The OSAH ruling, therefore, violates rules of construction that the OSAH had itself relied upon just days earlier in the same litigation. Quoting Judge Malihi,
“When the Court construes a constitutional or statutory provision, the ‘first step…is to examine the plain statutory language.’ [T]his Court is not authorized either to read into or to read out that which would add to or change its meaning.”

The OSAH decision ignores a precedential holding from the U.S. Supreme Court in favor of dicta from a later Supreme Court case. This issue was presented at length to the OSAH at oral arguments and in written submissions, yet the OSAH chose to completely ignore this issue in its decision.

That the OSAH decision relies upon a non-binding opinion from an Indiana State Appellate Court to support its conclusion further illustrates their failure to follow venerable rules of construction and judicial restraint. In Arkeny v. Governor, the Indiana opinion relied upon was litigated by pro-se citizens of Indiana against the Governor of that state. The Indiana court reached its holding via an issue that did not require interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, yet that court then proceeded to construe the U.S. Constitution anyway. The Indiana court?s decision to construe the U.S. Constitution without need to do so represents an overreaching Judiciary and violates a doctrine of judicial restraint established by the Supreme Court over 150 years ago. The OSAH’s reliance upon the Indiana court’s opinion, rather than follow a precedential holding of the U.S. Supreme Court, further demonstrates the OSAH’s errors of law.

Obama Eligibility Challenges Spread to 6 States

If readers watched the videos of the hearing in Atlanta Georgia (links were posted here at Talk Wisdom yesterday) then you would know that the decision in the Georgia case is expected soon. The deadline for papers being entered into the court case is February 1, 2012.

WorldNetDaily reports that ballot concerns are going viral and have already spread to 6 additional states.

Excerpt:

An administrative law judge in Georgia could decide as early as this week whether voters in the state convinced him Barack Obama’s name should be removed from the 2012 presidential ballot because he is not qualified to hold the office.

But win, lose or draw, the fight isn’t going to be over, as other cases are erupting across the nation, with challenges being raised anew even in Obama’s own adopted political network in Illinois.

The Georgia hearing was before Judge Michael Malihi, and while none of the lawyers who appeared in the proceedings was willing to predict what the decision will be, several did confirm that Malihi had considered simply granting them a default victory, because Obama and his lawyers expressly stated they would not participate in a hearing to provide evidence that he is qualified to be on the ballot.

A default presumably would have meant a recommendation from the judge that Obama’s name be stricken from the ballot, a decision which would head for review immediately by Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp.

He, however, was the one who warned Obama of the “peril” of not participating in the hearing when Obama and his attorney had asked that the event be canceled.

Whatever the outcome in Georgia, the issue is gaining traction in other states, too, including Alabama, Tennessee, Arizona, New Hampshire, and even Illinois, Obama’s home political base.

It is important to note that this challenge is different from the birth certificate challenges in the past that were often dismissed due to "lack of standing." Here is why:

The newest round of court actions do not try to have a judge determine Obama is not qualified for the Oval Office and remove him from it, they simply challenge his eligibility for the 2012 election.

Many of the cases cite Minor v. Happersett, a U.S. Supreme Court opinion from 1875 that said a “natural born citizen” would be a person whose parents both were citizens.

“This complaint does not request any injunction against any state or federal government official. Instead this complaint asserts that the private entity, Defendant Democratic Party, intends to act negligently or fraudulently in a manner that will cause irreparable harm to the plaintiffs, to the states, and to the citizens of the United States,” said one of the filings.

It continued, “Because Mr. Obama has admitted that his father was not a U.S. citizen, and because this fact has been confirmed by the U.S. State Department, any reasonable person with knowledge of these facts would doubt Mr. Obama’s constitutional qualifications. Therefore, any representation by the Democratic Party certifying said qualifications would be negligent, absent further evidence verifying Mr. Obama’s natural-born status.

“Plaintiffs further request an injunction prohibiting the Democratic Party from making any representation to any state official asserting, implying, or assuming that Mr. Obama is qualified to hold the office of president, absent a showing by the party sufficient to prove that said representation is not negligent.”

Van Irion, lead counsel for Liberty Legal Foundation, also is working on several of the issues, and has brought the question in court in Arizona.
Excerpt:

“We picked the Arizona court for several reasons, but the main one being that it is part of the 9th Circuit. The 9th Circuit has indicated in dicta that an FEC-registered presidential candidate would have standing for this type of suit,” he said. The organization is working with John Dummett, a Liberty Legal Foundation member who is a candidate for the office of president in the 2012 election.

Irion said the other lawsuit was filed in state court in Tennessee.

“The focus of the state-court suit is to prevent certification to the Tennessee Secretary of State. This suit puts greater emphasis on the negligent misrepresentation/fraud aspects of a certification from the DNC. It includes more facts regarding Obama’s Indonesian dual citizenship and fraudulent Social Security Number,” he said.

He said if the cases succeed, the Democrats would not be able to list Obama as their candidate for 2012.

“Neither lawsuit discusses Obama’s place of birth or his birth certificate. These issues are completely irrelevant to the argument. LLF’s lawsuit simply points out that the Supreme Court has defined ‘natural-born citizen’ as a person born to two parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the natural-born citizen’s birth. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen. Therefore, Obama can never be a natural-born citizen. His place of birth is irrelevant,” Van Irion’s group said.

WND also has reported that Maricopa, Ariz., County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has launched a formal law enforcement investigation into concerns Obama may submit fraudulent documentation to be put on the state’s election ballot in 2012.

Other attorneys involved in the Georgia case are J. Mark Hatfield and Orly Taitz.
Hatfield has told WND that the goal is for a court determination on the definition of “natural born citizen,” which then could be applied directly to Obama’s candidacy.

HT: WND

*******

While doing a search online, I found GodFatherPolitics.com.
This is interesting....

*******

Update @ 8:42 a.m. PT

A link to this post is featured in Georgia Point.com [Note: Scroll down page.]