Showing posts with label BIRTHERS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BIRTHERS. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Levin Confronted By A Birther



HT for graphic:  rdgablefiles at Wordpress

There is an interesting conversation going on at the blog called Obama Release Your Records.  I thought that I would bring that conversation over here to Talk Wisdom so that readers can listen to the audio of Mark Levin describing his encounter with a birther at a book signing.  Several interesting comments included in the conversation there and I have also shared my thoughts about what is being discussed in today's post entitled, "Levin Attacks Birthers: Admits He Hasn't Studied Issue; Declares Canadian-Born Cruz Eligible.

Basically, there is an audio there that covers the following:




Audio: Mark Levin Attacks Birthers: Admits He Hasn't 
Studied Issue; Declares Canadian-Born Cruz Eligible
 
 
 I'm disappointed in Levin.  But so many like him are claiming to be ignorant of this entire issue.  It is unfortunate that the person was rude when he approached Levin at the book signing.  It just goes to show that if you want your issues addressed, it is much better to calmly approach individuals so that they won't dismiss you out right just because of your angry behavior.

Look, I don't know entirely whether or not Obama was eligible in the first place.  Hey - if it is someday proven that Obama was eligible, and it turns out that I have been wrong on this issue, I will freely admit it.  However, his nativity story is unraveling like nothing I've ever seen before.  There are rumors that his mother wasn't actually Stanley Ann Dunham.  There are rumors that his father was either Frank Marshall Davis or Malcolm X.  If his genuine parents were both American citizens, then he is eligible.  But if this is true, then what about all of the fraud involved in creating a false narrative via his books, as well as the illegal act of presenting a fraudulent document that has been proven to be 100% fake because all  of the layers found on it  were computer generated?  Isn't that a crime in and of itself?

[Note:  Additional links to be added to the above paragraphs later so that you can read the posts that discuss these issues.]

Anyway, I would like to share some thoughts about Levin attacking a birther on his radio show.  I wonder whether or not he has seen the evidence of the fraudulent birth certificate that was used as "proof" of his citizenship?  Perhaps Sheriff Arpaio and his group should present him with their findings.


My comment  at the Obama Release Your Records site (with some added detail):


This is so disappointing to learn about Levin.  I was really encouraged by what I have read and heard concerning his new book, "The Liberty Amendments."  I haven't kept up with his radio show, so I didn't know that he was out rightly rejecting all of the evidence regarding Obama's fraudulent birth certificate.  For him to delve into the Constitution so deeply and re-discover a method for the states to legally hold a "convention of the states" (not a Constitutional convention which would involve Congress and could ruin the results); yet reject the portion of the Constitution that plainly states that any President of the United States NEEDS TO BE BORN OF TWO CITIZEN PARENTS tells me that he is behaving just like Supreme Court Justice Thomas when Thomas stated, "we are avoiding that issue."  See video.

Thomas said, "we are evading that issue."

[e·vade

[ih-veyd] Show IPA verb, e·vad·ed, e·vad·ing.
verb (used with object)
1.
to escape from by trickery or cleverness: to evade one's pursuers. avoid, dodge. face, confront.
2.
to get around by trickery: to evade rules.
3.
to avoid doing or fulfilling: to evade an obligation.
4.
to avoid answering directly: to evade a question.
5.
to elude; escape: The solution evaded him.]
 

I don't know exactly why so many are avoiding the issue, but I suspect that it has to do with losing their jobs, family members threatened, exposure of past sins/indiscretions, or the ultimate silencer - the threat of death to themselves or loved ones.
 
It is really very odd that ObaMARXIST and his BADministration is getting away with so much corruption, deception, criminality and even possible murders that have occurred to keep people silent on the "birther" issue.  The way that every scandal is being swept away without anyone enduring any kind of punishment is unfathomable!  But it's happening.  We must continue to ask WHY?
I was actually hoping (naively, perhaps) that Ted Cruz brought up his birth certificate and the recent "renouncement of his Canadian citizenship" in order to demonstrate that HE IS, IN FACT, INELIGIBLE just as Obama is ineligible!  But it doesn't appear to be the case (not yet, anyway).

Listen, like most conservatives, I love the challenges that Ted Cruz puts up against the elitists in Congress.  He might even make a great president one day!  Unfortunately, according to our U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1, clause 5, Cruz is not eligible!

 However, it would be a brilliant idea for Cruz to use his status to help smoke out Obama's ineligibility crimes - wouldn't it?  Getting the media of mass deception to cover Cruz's ineligibility for POTUS would shed much light on Obama's fake nativity story - and his ineligibility (whether it was because he was born in Kenya and Obama Sr. was really his father, or that stepfather Soetoro in Indonesia adopting him and putting him in school there caused loss of Barry's American citizenship); as well as the suspected idea that Barry attended college (recall those sealed records?)  in the U.S. as a "foreign student" with foreign aid out into the open!  It would also present a great opportunity for Zullo, Sheriff Arpaio, and the Cold Case Posse to expose the findings that the B.C. Obama touted as genuine is a COMPLETELY FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT due to the fact that it was entirely computer generated.

Well, thanks for reading my thoughts here.  It probably won't do any good but thought I'd express them anyway.

One day, the truth will come out.  The Bible tells us in three verses:

Mat 10:26

“Therefore do not fear them. For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known.


 Luk 8:17

“For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and come to light.


 Luk 12:2

“For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, nor hidden that will not be known.

*******

Hat tip:


Obama Release Your Records

Tuesday, June 05, 2012

Obama's Birthgate

WOW!! A new post over at American Thinker concerning The Morphing Obama Biography and the Skeptics has to be one of the best I've ever read about the controversy! Please visit the link to read the whole thing. LOTS of links to corroborate the excellent and truthful points that author Cindy Simpson makes within the article!  Here's the most intense portion:

Want to see Obama's college transcripts? That's a hint at affirmative action -- racist. Wonder whether he attended as a foreign student? That's birther. Want to know more about Obama's religious beliefs and his relationship with Jeremiah Wright? Racist. Note that experts assert that the posted birth certificate is a probable digital forgery, or wonder if the White House was playing games in presenting such a strange document? Birther. Ask whether Obama wrote his autobiography? That's racist and birther. Vote for the blank box instead of Obama in the Democratic primary? Racist. Note that Obama and his attorneys ignored a court-issued subpoena, an Obama attorney asserted in a courtroom that even Mickey Mouse didn't need to show a birth certificate to run for president, and that the media didn't cover any of it? How birther.

In the same segment that Rivera blasted "birthers" for being "racist," he interviewed Lord Christopher Monckton, who has openly acknowledged the birth certificate anomalies. In between snorts and laughter during Monckton's explanation, Rivera insinuated that Monckton and his forensic experts were "smoking crack." And another of Rivera's guests, NYU professor Charlton McIlwain, implied that any questions of Obama's history and credentials were motivated by racism.
Journalists who pursue "facts and data," even while insisting they aren't wearing birther spectacles, are discovering that the mainstream media still depicts them as bottom-feeding "spawn," "aiding and abetting birtherism."

When the media finally did cover the agency biography story, they asserted that it had been "discredited" and then used it to bash Romney. None dared touch the fact that the agency updated the original 1991 biography several times for changes in Obama's career over the 16 years, yet did not revise the "born in Kenya" part (or downgrade the job descriptions of his parents) until 2007, two months after Obama announced his candidacy.

The biography story is radioactive: it addresses the taboo subject of Obama's birth, his life narrative, and his character and credentials, and it illustrates the mainstream's utter lack of journalistic integrity.
And if the clicks on your mental Geiger-counter are tap-tapping rapidly in agreement after reading that, you've been exposed to non-reversible birtherism radiation.

Skeptics, like business owners reviewing the job application of a prospective employee, are not satisfied with the glossy media photo and indulgent autobiography. They're also looking for the missing link in Obama's evolution from a college radical, Jeremiah Wright church member, and community organizer into a pragmatic moderate.

Obama responded to the questions with taunts -- in speeches, comedy routines, and prayer breakfasts -- and his campaign profited by selling birth-certificate-emblazoned t-shirts and mugs.

Some might argue that a little biography padding is expected, but redrawing family trees with a Cherokee branch or moving the birthplace to a more exotic location seems to work only in certain elite circles.

And the same newspaper that is still hiding the Khalidi tape has now added another new term to the lexicon -- transcripters -- to describe people who want to investigate the "tomb-like silence around [Obama's] college years."

Obama's "blank screen" evolved along with his political career, and when inconvenient facts got in the way, out came the media edits and erasers. If anyone dares notice any missed spots or erasure smudges, he or she is racist, birther, or distracted from the economy. And no one is allowed to wonder if the chalkboard mess has anything to do with the economic mess.

"Four years in office is what I call vetting," columnist Eugene Robinson asserts. Others would call the four years a disaster.

Fretting over the media's ties of Romney to Trump (with his "discredited" birther claims) but not Obama's to Sharpton, Breitbart's John Nolte wrote:
These are the games the media intends to play throughout this campaign. This is all about getting Obama reelected with distractions, guilty-by-association, and nonsense narratives that suck all the oxygen away from any conversations surrounding Obama's failed policies.
The "birther" issue has not been "discredited" -- what has been discredited is the reliability and reputation of the mainstream media. And the oxygen that Nolte worried about getting sucked away has accumulated right next to the explosive truth of the flimsy, morphing, media-supported Obama narrative.

If Watergate taught us that the cover-up is worse than the crime, the current affair would be better-described by a word coined with the "-gate" suffix than by "-er." Involving more than a birth story, it reaches across the entire narrative. And this time, instead of the mainstream media doing the investigation and reporting, they're actually assisting in the construction and the cover-up.

So which is it: Birtherism or Narrative-gate? The answer depends on which "field guide" you follow -- one written by the "Democrat-Media Complex," or one that asks questions to lead to the truth.


Hat Tip: American Thinker

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Conservatives Need To Examine Trump Carefully! [Updates]

I must admit, there are a LOT of things that bother me about Donald Trump and his bloviating on his possible run for the presidency. Have you noticed? He is on almost every network out there in media-of-mass-deception land!  First of all, doesn't it seem strange that so many in the liberal leftist T.V. land are willing to interview him about the "birther" issue?  I still can't decide whether Trump is genuinely concerned about Obama not being a legitimate president, or if Trump is pushing the "birther" issue in order to:

1.  Fool Republicans into making him their GOP candidate.

2.  A "plant" by the leftist Democrats to continue the shift away from the REAL issue - the impossibility that Obama could ever be a natural born citizen of the United States of America because his father (if, in fact, his biological father was Obama Sr.) was never a citizen of the United States.

If you have been viewing many of Trumps interviews lately, perhaps you will notice the huge differences between Trump's interviews and the following CNN interview of Orly Taitz:

Creating Orwellian Worldview: CNN John King Shows Invalid COLB

If you watch the video all the way to the end, you will see how the other guest shouts down Ms. Taitz when she brings up the fact that Obama used (or is still using) a Connecticut social security number that was previously given to someone else. O'Reilly tried to shut down that fact on his show a while back [be sure to view the video at above link and watch Reverend Manning’s excellent analysis of Bill O’Reilly’s lying performance]
by claiming that Obama's father lived in Connecticut for a while and therefore, that is why Obama Jr. has a SSN from there. However, the sequence of numbers does not match numbers given out in 1961. Apparently, it matches numbers of someone much older. There is also a problem with the number used for Obama Jr's selective service application.

[Update: For more information about the fraudulent SSN:

The Steady Drip: Three Straws That Break aka Obama's Back]

Anyway, back to Trump.


While reading comments over at Patriot Action Network: Donald Trump, “If I Run, I’m Running as a Republican” there are some commentators who believe that "the Donald" would make a great candidate. Others, (like me) are far more cautious. Let's not make the same mistake with Trump in 2012 that the voting public made with Obama in 2008!

Take special note of the following comments and links:

 Reply by Cheri Vaughan 15 hours ago



By Gary P Jackson
Jonathan Hoenig, Managing Member of Capitalistpig Asset Management LLC, has some harsh words for “The Donald” in an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal’sSmart Money blog: [emphasis mine]
Successful businessmen are oftentimes the worst defenders of capitalism. Recent financial interventions began not with President Obama , for example, but with the $30 billion bailout of Bear Stearns under the supposedly fiscally conservative Bush Administration and then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, former head of Goldman Sachs ( GS: 160.42, -1.05, -0.65% ) . The TARP slush fund , onerous Sarbanes-Oxley regulationand prescription drug entitlement were all their handiwork too.
Both Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway ( BRK.B: 81.68, -0.58, -0.70% ) and speculator/philanthropist George Soros are successful businessmen with extremely anti-capitalist ideals. Buffett proudly advocates for a highly progressive income tax where earnings are looted from one segment of the population and transferred to another . Soros has long supported centralized planning and heavy government intervention in the free market.
Yet because of their great individual wealth, their ideas are championed as business-savvy proposals which would lead to a stronger, more prosperous economy.
They would not – and neither would those of Donald Trump.
For example, Trump professes to support free trade, yet proposes a 25% tax on imported goods from China to level what he sees as trade imbalances in the global economy. It’s a contemptuous proposal which would immediately punish Americans by raising the price on virtually everything we buy.
He has also called for regulators to stop European stock operator Deutsche Börse’s ( DBOEY ) planned $9.5 billion buyout of the NYSE Euronext ( NYX: 37.85, +0.26, +0.69% ) , telling Fox Business Network, “I don’t want foreign countries owning the New York Stock Exchange.” If he was the president, he added, he “wouldn’t even have allowed the discussions to take place.” In a capitalist country, shareholders make that kind of decision, not regulators . Trump sees a clear role for governmentpicking winners and losers in the economy, just the same as the previous presidents he claims to critique.
On top of that, he has pushed for a one-time 14.25% tax on the rich as a means of supplementing funding for Social Security and Medicaid, along with universal health care .
Philosophically, those positions are indistinguishable from the anti-capitalist political establishment now in power.
Trump, of course, is free to run and support whatever platform he wishes, as are his many fans across the country. But despite his personal fortune, they should know his proposals and political philosophy are far from capitalist.Punitive and redistributionist taxes, centralized planning, barriers to trade and an entitlement “social safety net” are all ideas straight out of Karl Marx , not John Galt .
“You need a person like me to run this country for a while because we have to get this country back so that we’re respected again.” Trump told CNN recently.
A businessman whose proposals seek to destroy capitalism? There’s nothing to respect about that.
Read more here.
The old saying “buyer beware” has never been more appropriate. Donald Trump is not what he seems.
Voters were hoodwinked by Obama and his rhetoric. Trumps record and ideas are more in line with Barack Obama [and Karl Marx] than any Conservative or Tea party member.
Trump is simply playing his supporters for fools, just like Obama did to his in 2008.

Reply by Kathleen B. Collins 12 hours ago


Thanks for passing Gary P. Jackson's clear and informative political analyses of Donald Trump.  I was also beginning to be duped by him, i.e. until I was told to listen to Mark Levin at: http://www.therightscoop.com/levin-rips-donald-trump-to-shreds/.  whose analysis is ultimately the same: Don't let his rhetoric fool you. There is no difference between Obama and Trump!

And there are MANY MORE postings to read regarding why conservatives, and especially TEA Party Patriots, should not be duped by Trump! In order to educate yourself, please read all of the posts by Cherie Vaughan over at Patriot Action Network:

Cheri Vaughan's Discussions

People, the bottom line is this. PLEASE DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK AND VET ANYONE IN WHOM YOU PLAN TO PLACE YOUR VOTE AND YOUR TRUST IN FOR THE 2012 ELECTION!!!

Hat Tips to all links.

*******

Update:

The NEIN Blog: Barry Soetoro's Hidden Past

He's the biggest fraud EVER in the history of the United States of America!!

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Birthers Correct FactCheck’s False Claims about Trump

Here's absolute PROOF that you cannot rely on Factcheck.org to TELL THE TRUTH when it comes to all of the questions surrounding Obama's ineligibility to be POTUS!

We the People of the United States: Birthers Correct FactCheck’s False Claims about Trump

Even though the term "Birthers" is often meant as a pejorative against those who legitimately question why Obama has spent almost 2 million dollars on Perkins-Coie lawyers in court cases exposing his lack of natural born citizen status and WHY OBAMA WON'T RELEASE his long form COLB; those who are NOT backing down on this issue are true patriots of the United States of America!

BIRTHER stands for Brave Individual Requesting Traitors Heed Eligibility Requirements

Although I probably wouldn't support Trump for president, I do admire his tenacity in the investigation about why Obama is hiding his long-form COLB from the court cases and the American people!

Hat Tip:

We the People of the United States

*******

Also see:

The Post & Email: Is Obama Ineligibility a Side Show or the Main Event?

THIS ISSUE IS NOT GOING AWAY AND SHOULDN'T! THERE IS EVERY REASON TO CONTINUE PRESSING THIS ISSUE BECAUSE OBAMA SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN ELECTED PRESIDENT IN THE FIRST PLACE AND THEREFORE SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN A SECOND TERM!!!

*******

Also see:

Rightwire.net: Open Letter to Donald Trump

*******

A MUST SEE! I have heard about the hushed-up illegal recording of foreign baby births in Hawaii on another blog, but Lame Cherry discussed the topic back in January, 2011 and reveals the mistake that the new Democratic Governor - Neil Abercrombie - made in his so-called "search" for the Obama birth certificate (in order to shut up the BIRTHERS once and for all) and therefore reveals how Abercrombie stepped in it - big time - through his blundering idiot statements!

Lame Cherry: Obama X marks the spot

The dots are being connected, people. The question now remains, just how long with the ObamaFRAUD charade continue??

*******

Old article from 2008, but interesting nonetheless:

Indonesia Matters: Barry Soetoro

Hundreds of comments too.