Murderer Dorner Manifesto Reveals ObamaBorgBot Propaganda Filled Mindset

(H/T for photo:  Michael B. from Tea Party Community)

Once again, the media of mass deception and corruption refuses to share all of the information from that liberal-leftist-lunatic-former-cop-turned murderer's manifesto.  Why?  Because it reveals his lunacy and dangerously hypocritical mindset.  He's not ill - he's intelligently evil!  There is a difference.  His manifesto and actions reveals how dangerous his ObamaBorgBot propaganda-filled mentality is; because he is hopelessly attached to BHO, his ilk, and the far left maniacs in the media.  We have a media who, incidentally, continues to lie to the American people and refuses to do their job.  They won't report the truth about this creep, but at least one blogger has the courage to do so:

Soopermexican.com: News Media Scrub Cop Murderer’s Manifesto of Pro-Obama, Hillary, MSNBC, CNN, Gay, and Anti-Gun Comments

Soopermexican makes a good point.  Quote:

Radicalized by Trayvon Martin Propaganda:

Too bad Trayvon didn’t smash your skull completely open, Zim.

He further praised Ellen Degeneres, H.W. Bush, Tim Tebow, and many hollywood actresses. He’s obviously disturbed.
 
So should MSNBC and Obama be blamed for this murderous scum targeting cops and their families? NO – but if we applied the same standard that the media does conservatives and Republicans, then each of the people on this list contributed to the radicalization of a murderer who has taken 3 lives.
And why did they edit all of this out? Would they do this for a Tea Party shooter? Somehow I doubt it.

/quote


Recall how the leftist media goons tried to blame the Gabrielle Giffords shooting by Jared Loughner on Sarah Palin because of "targeted districts" on a map for the purpose of winning elections in those districts for Republicans?

Recall how the leftist media LIARS tried to pin the Aurora Colorado movie theater shootings on a TEA Party member who happened to have the same name as the James Holmes who actually committed the crime?

If you are still believing what the media of mass propaganda spews out on a regular basis in order to protect the criminals in this BADministration and/or anyone who agrees with Obamafraud and his ilk, then you need to WAKE UP AND SEE THE TYRANNY!

Even BHO's false campaign of "hope" in the 2008 election and the communist campaign of "forward" in the 2012 election didn't help this cop-turned-murderer. 

Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that REAL hope doesn't come from any political leader.  REAL HOPE only comes from KNOWING AND FOLLOWING our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.

A post will be forthcoming on genuine hope.


Hat tips:
Soopermexican
Newsbusters.org

Newspaper Reveals Bias In Rejecting Letters-to-the-Editor

Via email, my friend Bing (Irv) sent me a copy of a letter-to-the-editor that was obviously rejected due to bias and disagreement with the content of the letter rather than for any reasonable, or truly logical basis or cause.

I thought that his letter was so spot on!  Therefore, I am sharing it with readers here at Talk Wisdom.

Included below the letter, are the lame excuses that the so-called assistant "editor" (more like an anti-Christian bigot!) wrote back explaining why Bing's letter was not published.

You will then read his great response, and her second (and STUPID!!) response.

The stomping on free speech by the liberal leftist lunatics of the media of mass deception and corruption is very obvious within the email letter exchange below!

~  Christine

*******

Bing (Irv) wrote:

Atheism exists not because their adherents don'’t believe in God, but precisely because they do. It is visible in the presence of the ACLU, the derogatory letters in the Times of Christians, and the intentional downplaying of Christmas. Atheism is manifest in the hate for God that they exhibit, but that leads to the question of why do you hate something so badly if it is unreal; a myth?

Atheism exists to escape the consequences of which their inner beings are aware, and they must deny God in the hopes that if they complain loudly enough He will go away.

You know, they are right. God has left our country and the result is immorality, the “"me"” generation, the get what you can mentality, and the class warfare that inevitably comes with the “takers” of life. From it springs the demented mentalities of school shootings that are blamed on the physical presence of guns, rather on a lack of the mental presence of a loving God.

*******

This was her response:

Irv,

The same standards and rules apply to the letters to the editor under the new management. Opinion-based letters are accepted, but letters that get too technical, theological, specialized or scientific are not accepted.

Thanks,

Jennifer Ianni

 

*******

 

I (Irv) sent her this:

 

The paper, by its rejecting letters on that basis, are contributing to the dumbing-down of our society.

Adolph Hitler made the observation that, "All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach."

BTW, you never addressed my specific letter. Would you, or would you not, since you do some editing?

The letter appears to me to be culturally significant to the times and the motivation of many people.

We are in an amoral/me decline that appears obvious.

*******

 

Her response:

Irv,

I ran this letter by my editor, and he and I both agree that this is letter is making a theological argument and is not an opinion letter. Therefore, it violates our policy.

We are a general circulation newspaper, and the letters need to reflect that.

Take care,

Jennifer Ianni

 

*******

 

The North County Times lost me and my family as customers over 11 years ago!  I can see that they have become even worse in their blatantly obvious bias since that time.

 

~  Christine

 

 

UT San Diego: You Have The Blood Of An American Hero On Your Hands

The good news regarding the tragic terrorist attack on 9/11/12 in Benghazi, Libya which resulted in the deaths of four Americans is that some in the mainstream media refuse to no longer ignore the incontrovertible evidence of the White House’s dishonesty and incompetence.  The disgraceful and obvious cover-up by the Obama BADministration is being exposed, at last, by more than just Fox News (which broke all the accumulating evidence) and the blogs which have been sharing the truth as it all unfolds from day one.

~  Christine

*******

UT San Diego: ‘YOU HAVE THE BLOOD OF AN AMERICAN HERO ON YOUR HANDS’

Copy of article:

What did President Barack Obama know and when did he know it? Why has the Obama administration kept changing its story about how Ambassador Chris Stevens, security officials Tyrone Woods of Imperial Beach and Glen Doherty of Encinitas, and information officer Sean Smith, who grew up in San Diego, died on Sept. 11 in Benghazi, Libya? Why won’t the mainstream media treat the incontrovertible evidence of the White House’s dishonesty and incompetence like the ugly scandal it obviously is?

 

These are all questions that demand to be answered after revelations that demolished the tidy narrative the president has been offering about Benghazi.

 

Until last week, the White House had taken a moderate hit over the fact that for two weeks after it happened, officials had fostered the impression that the four Americans were killed Sept. 11 in a spontaneous protest triggered by a blasphemous anti-Islam video posted on YouTube – not by a coordinated terrorist attack on the 11th anniversary of 9/11. But administration officials pushed back by saying the “fog of war” had left them uncertain about events, and that when White House press secretary Jay Carney and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice had cited the video, they were only repeating the best available information they had. The president’s repeated comments conveyed the impression that he wasn’t aware of the attacks as they were unfolding, saying only that the next day, he ordered increased security for embassies in the area.

But after a torrent of leaks of official emails and communiqués – likely coming from CIA officials who refuse to participate in a cover-up and/or who won’t accept the role of scapegoat – the “fog of war” narrative looks like damage control: a determined attempt to keep the facts from the public until after the Nov. 6 election. After the leaks, the president suddenly changed his story to say he was aware of the attacks as they unfolded and had quickly issued an order to “make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to.”

 

There was no “fog.” There was no spontaneous uprising. Thanks to a drone and other surveillance technology, the White House’s national security team knew in real time that the U.S. consulate and a “safe house” a mile away in Benghazi were under coordinated attack by a well-armed group, not from a protest that unexpectedly escalated. Over a seven-hour span on Sept. 11, the besieged Americans made at least two urgent requests for help; the U.S. military has considerable assets in the area that could have been deployed to Benghazi.

 

Who told the besieged Americans they were out of luck?

 

After hints appeared in the media that it was the CIA’s fault, the spy agency – obviously at the behest of CIA Director David Petraeus – put out a statement Friday that flatly denied it opposed coming to the rescue of Stevens, Woods, Doherty and Smith. At roughly the same time, in a TV interview, the president offered his new narrative of being aware of the crisis and taking decisive action, while refusing to answer the direct question of whether Americans in Benghazi requested help but were rejected. A day later, however, the White House said in fact that it had never received requests for help. This sets up the Pentagon to take the fall.

 

On Monday, incredibly, Obama acted put-upon by the questions about his administration’s integrity. In a TV appearance, he said, “I do take offense with some suggestion that in any way, we haven’t tried to make sure that the American people knew as the information was coming in what we believed.” Remember, the president made this statement only after leaks the previous week demolished his and his administration’s dishonest, intentionally misleading Benghazi narrative.

It has now been seven weeks since the terrorist attack. We deserve to know the truth. Charles Woods, father of Tyrone Woods, the former Navy SEAL from Imperial Beach, said it best in a Monday TV interview.

 

“I can’t imagine anyone with any heart that would watch a battle rage for seven hours knowing that heroes were there that were going to be slaughtered if you didn’t have help sent in. ... Whoever it was that was in that room watching that video of my son dying, their cries for help, their order ‘don’t help them at all, let them die’ ... you have the blood of my son, you have the blood of an American hero on your hands. I don’t know who you are, but one of these days the truth will come out.”

 

The senior Woods is correct. Inevitably, there will be a bipartisan fact-finding commission into this terrible tragedy and its cover-up.

 

Unless the mainstream media stops abetting the cover-up and the facts come out without a commission wielding subpoena power.

 

Isn’t this a story – a gigantic story?

 

Of course. But we fear that ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, The New York Times and The Washington Post will only choose to realize how obvious this is after Nov. 6. Then it will come to them – spontaneously, we’re sure.
 

Hat Tip: UT San Diego

*******

Be sure to read:

Why Obama Chose to Let Them Die in Benghazi

at American Thinker - 10 hours ago

The burning question is why Obama didn't give orders to defend our consulate and American lives in Benghazi. The answer is becoming clearer each time President Obama and Secretary of Defense Panetta issue a denial or explanation.

What Fast & Furious is REALLY All About! [Updates!]

It usually takes the liberal Media of Mass Deception extra time to learn the true facts on any particular subject - especially when it comes to their darling-of-a-pResident in the White House - Barack Hussein Obama.  Suspicion over the REAL reasons why the gun-runner scandal, Fast and Furious, was adopted by the democrats was discussed years ago in several conservative blogs.  Just do a search and you will probably find some astute bloggers expressing such suspicions right after border agent Brian Terry's tragic death. 

Today, a blogger named Russ Vaughn at American Thinker has pieced it all together.  (And...liberal idiots like Juan Williams claim that bloggers aren't "real" journalists!!)

Fast and Furious Falling Apart

at American Thinker - 6 hours ago

Now that the official rationale has been revealed to be nonsense, the gravity of the corruption at the root of Fast and Furious is becoming clear even to skeptics.

This tells us exactly why evilcrat Obama declared "executive privilege" when corruptocrat Eric Holder refused to turn over the documents requested by Congress.  Holder would rather be held in contempt of Congress than reveal the truth.  The little secret that is being guarded is meant to protect not only Obama and Holder, but also Hillary Clinton, Janet Napolitano, and probably dozens of other underlings who might talk and endanger Obama's re-election campaign.

Excerpt:

When BATF agents first blew the whistle on what is now known as Operation Fast and Furious, the rationale offered by DoJ for such an evidently foolish operation was that it was designed to allow BATF to track and prosecute the leaders of the Mexican drug cartels. As more information surfaced from the Mexican government and the BATF's Mexican bureau chief specifying that none of them knew anything of this operation, many of us who were paying a bit closer attention to the case immediately smelled the first foul scent of corruption.

The fatal flaw in DoJ's explanation was this: if the Mexican authorities had not been brought into the operation, nor even the BATF's own agents authorized to operate in Mexico, then the proffered DoJ justification made utterly no sense, for the simple reason that once those walked guns hit the south side of that border, there was absolutely no process in place to track them to their supposed targets. Therefore, DoJ was patently misrepresenting its motive. Why?

For those who keep a constant wary eye on the left's never-ending war on our 2^nd-Amendment right to keep and bear arms, the increasingly fishy smell emanating from Washington led to connecting the dots back to the year-earlier revelations in the liberal media that weapons being used in Mexican crimes were traceable back to American sources more than 90% of the time. That false meme had spread quickly through the major liberal media, along with calls for stricter gun control laws in this country by...guess who! How about our president, our secretary of state, our attorney general, and other notable Democrats, for starters?

Here we had an operation mounted by the executive branch of the United States, an operation which had as its stated goal -- after being outed, that is -- the targeting of Mexican drug lords on sovereign Mexican soil. Yet this was done without the knowledge of anyone in the Mexican government. Quite clearly, a secret and subversive operation had been conceived and implemented against our sister nation to the south -- subversive because, again, quite clearly, the American government was subverting the sovereign authority of Mexico without that nation's knowledge. If the goal was, as stated later by DoJ, to track guns into Mexico to the purchasing sources in the cartels, then was there not some diplomatic requirement to notify the Mexican government that we were arming their most violent criminal elements? And what was the need for keeping our own BATF agents in Mexico -- the only American agents with Mexican presence to conduct such surveillance and tracking operations on Mexican soil -- equally in the dark?

It doesn't require much in the way of deductive powers to conclude that the fish-wrap smell seeping out of Washington probably had to do with Eric Holder's Department of Justice being used to tightly wrap something rotting from the head down. And what could that be? Early proponents of the theory suggesting that if the DoJ's rationale smelled fishy, then perhaps the true reason for F&F was to create justification for more gun control legislation here in this country were looked at as crackpot conspiracists. Even now, most of those Republican members of Congress pursuing this scandal refuse to cite the true purpose of F & F, still referring to it as a bungled federal program. There are exceptions: Florida congressman John Mica speaking on one of the Sunday talk shows this weekend, made clear his opinion that F & F was a sinister and cynical attempt by the Obama administration to undermine the 2^nd Amendment. I watched him say it, but Google has no link. Imagine that.

Be sure to go to the link to read a five-step summary of how the operation was supposed to work, and
five questions to consider as to why this failed operation was a "secret" way for the dems to undermine American's 2nd Amendment rights!


Here's the kicker:

When looked at this way, doesn't Obama's statement to a group of gun control advocates in March 2011 that he was taking steps to further gun control restrictions, but "under the radar," now seem less cryptic than it did at the time? There is a link to a Huffington Post article [I don't want to link to them] entitled: "Chicago Homicide Rate Worse Than Kabul, Up To 200 Police Assigned To High-Profile Wedding (Video)."

Long story short - this is what happens when liberals have the goal of confiscating guns from the citizenry. The criminals still have them while law abiding individuals don't have them to defend themselves. But the ultimate reason why liberals want to stomp on the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States is explained in the following paragraph.

Excerpt:

Never lose sight of the real reason why liberals want to confiscate your guns. Liberals assert that government is the protector of all our freedoms, and therefore we need not be concerned with protecting ourselves and our loved ones. The folly of that assertion can be refuted with one word: Chicago. But the true reason for wanting an unarmed public is because such a citizenry is powerless in the face of armed government and therefore compliant. Liberals and Democrats know full well that the key to unrestrained governing is to first disarm the citizenry.

And the truth shall set us free!!!!

Hat Tip:

American Thinker

*******
Gateway Pundit has more:

Obama Knew About Gun Walking Program in 2009 Then Used “Fast & Furious” To Make Case For Gun Regulations (Video)

Jim Hoft at The Gateway Pundit - 1 hour ago

[ BE SURE TO WATCH THESE VIDEOS!!!]

Hat tip for video # 1: The Right Scoop 

Barack Obama knew about the gun walking program in March 2009. The Right Scoop reported: In April 2009 Barack Obama traveled to Mexico and blamed US gun sellers for violence south of the border. Obama told his Mexican audience, “This … Continue reading →

Some interesting comments over at Gateway Pundit:

#8 June 21, 2012 at 7:25 am Ella commented:

Are we to believe that Eric Holder is going through this because he’s protecting a few dumb underlings who supposedly conceived a terrible idea? Riiiiiiiiiight. Wise up, America. He’s protecting Barack Obama. The president is the one behind all of this. Barack Obama has an awful lot of blood on his hands.

  #10 June 21, 2012 at 7:46 am archer52 commented:

I remember Obama telling the anti-gun people when they complained he was avoiding the anti-gun agenda “Don’t worry. We have something working that will change things. You will be pleased.” That was around 2009.

Then the political messaging started that the violence in Mexico was the fault of gun shops, too many guns being purchased etc., and something needed to be done. They showed photos of “seized” American weapons including things we couldn’t buy here. But that was the narrative pushed into the MSM and then pushed out to us.

The Senate offered up a bill to combat the sale of weapons in America to stop the violence in Mexico. THEN F&F came out and things started going wobbly.

But the Senate, I think Feinstein, went ahead and tried to get the bill passed. However, the facts were coming out, ATF agents were flipping and telling the story and the energy for the bill died. She still blabbered and stammered, but to no avail (She is in on it too BTW).

Suddenly, what was a ghost operation running behind the scenes to push another assault weapon ban here became the story and Holder found himself the target. Thus, as always, the coverup started. Lawyers are schooled in the art of delay. They hope things happen (Zimmerman anyone) that will take the focus off of their case by just throwing up crap and hoping for the best.

But that didn’t happen. Gratefully, the opposition party held one Branch (much like in the nineties with Waco and Ruby Ridge) and were able to bring light to the scheme. Had that not been the case, the “truth” would have never come out. Much like how we are now learning about Obamacare’s deals with all the special interest groups instead of back in 2010 when it was being formed, having all three branches controlled by the Democrats guarantees an almost Soviet like atmosphere and until one Branch breaks through, it is what we are going to suffer from forever as the MSM has been compromised.

This is Obama’s reelection year. If Holder is smart, he’ll cut a deal where he gets immunity and leaves. If not, if Obama doesn’t get reelected, the serious investigations may start and Holder, a man of questionable judgment and morals, may realize what so many tyrants and arrogant leaders discovered much to their dismay- he stayed one day too long.

Imagine him doing the perp walk!

*******

Here is one example of a blogger exposing the truth back in 2011!!

The Right Scoop: Carney’s outright lie on the Obama administration’s assault on the Second Amendment

*******

Update:

Also see:

Krauthammer On Holder Contempt Vote: “There’s No Way the Mainstream Media Can Ignore This Anymore” (Video)

Jim Hoft at The Gateway Pundit - 1 hour ago

FOX News analyst Charles Krauthammer commented on the Contempt vote against Eric Holder last night on Special Report. Krauthammer says, “There’s no way the mainstream media, which have studiously tried to ignore this, can do that anymore.” That, in itself, …

*******

Update!

Also see my blog friend Steve's new post:

Cry and Howl: About Executive Privilege...

*******

Twitter Suspends Conservative Writer's Account

Well, that certainly didn't take long. I was wondering when those of the liberal leftist ideological universe  would attempt to censor conservatives on Twitter.  Apparently, the goonies bombarded Mr. Loesch's (husband of Tea Party leader and conservative writer, Dana Loesch) account with false accusations of spamming which caused Twitter to outwardly cancel the account. 

Isn't it obvious how liberals always want to halt the free speech rights of those who share opposing political views?  Looks like the typical, liberal-mental-disordered way continues to include the silencing of the opposition rather than engaging in a mature, informative, and civil debate on issues. What's more, they usually tend to do it with SUCH NASTINESS!  So childish....

Twitter Suspends Conservative Account, Liberal Foul Play Suspected.

Excerpt:

A not-so funny thing happened on the social media website Twitter Sunday.

As the Washington Times reports, the account of Chris Loesch, the husband of Tea Party leader and conservative writer Dana Loesch, was suspended by Twitter management due to what observers believe was foul play by liberal users of the website that don't like the couple's politics:

Conservative Chris Loesch, music producer and husband of radio host and CNN contributor Dana Loesch, had his Twitter account suspended on Sunday. He was apparently targeted by leftist users who utilized the "Block & Report Spam" function to trigger the social media account's automatic spam algorithm. He was notified of his suspension via an email from Twitter claiming it was due to multiple unsolicited mentions to other users. "You will need to change your behavior to continue using Twitter," the email admonished.

"I never threatened anyone and am careful about being concise with what I write especially in public," Mr. Loesch told The Washington Times. "They were going to make me sign this note that said one more infraction and I would be permanently banned. I wasn't going to do that so I wrote emails to some of their people."

Mrs. Loesch, who also is the editor of Big Journalism, believes a coordinated attack against him came when he started defending her from all kinds of vile messages and threats by liberal antagonists.

As she wrote Sunday:

There have been stories going around of conservatives getting suspended from Twitter over innocuous things while accounts like @KillZimmerman (an account which threatened to kill George Zimmerman) and other such accounts were left active for weeks. After a user remarked about me being raped and murdered, Chris and others defended me.

Anyone familiar with Twitter knows that Mrs. Loesch is regularly bombarded with disgustingly hateful, sexist, and misogynistic messages from her opponents. As she re tweets many of them, I have witnessed more than I'd wish to recall.

"It was business as usual for her I suppose," Mr. Loesch told the Times. "Veiled threats, rape and murder comments, the typical liberal misogynist slag. Being the chivalrous and testosterone filled being I am requires me to protect the woman I love and call out the haters for being the 'anonymous Internet tough guys' they are...Needless to say they don't like being called out and struck back by reporting me as a spammer or worse."

Mrs. Loesch published a screen cap of those tweets:

Despicable, isn't it?

Read the rest at Newsbusters.

As you will see when you read the entire article at Newsbusters, liberals abusing the "report spam" option on Mr. Loesch's account are probably the culprits in this incident.  The author of the article has some hopes, though, that Twitter will work out this issue in order to avoid such "report spam" liars in the future:

At the moment, Mr. Loesch's account is still on ice, but he's been informed that Twitter is not only investigating the matter, but is also working on safeguards to prevent it in the future
.
As I tweeted myself last evening, this makes a great deal of sense. Twitter is now used by America's political leaders and top journalists. They're certainly not going to participate in a social media website where their account can be so easily removed by opponents.

Although I'm not a software engineer, I imagine there's a solution that doesn't result in more spam on the website.

For instance, a spam complaint could require a link to the offending message itself proving that spam had actually been sent.

Again, this is not my expertise, but as I tweeted Sunday evening, I believe this episode will actually be a good thing in the long run as a safer, more user friendly Twitter will emerge for all to enjoy in the years to come.

Fingers crossed.


Hat tip:  Newsbusters

Update:

Protein Wisdom has more information:

 protein wisdom

Liberal Fascist Alert: Organized Progressives using Twitter’s Spam block/report to suspend Conservative Accounts [Darleen Click]

 

Excerpt:

 

And they brag about it, too.

As our late-night-owl readers know, after Twitter reinstated conservative activist Chris Loesch’s account in the wee hours of Sunday night/Monday morning, the progressive flag-spam lynch mob — a vicious group of free speech-squelching Twitter users who trigger automatic suspensions by falsely “mass reporting” conservatives as “spammers” — took him down again and again. [...]
And you will not be surprised to learn that at least one of the Twitter libs identified as a flag-spam ringleader also happens to be spearheading a Stop Rush Limbaugh effort online.

While Twitter executives sleep on the job, conservatives online are battling not only Loesch’s suspension, but the suspension of more than a dozen — and possibly dozens, if not hundreds more — innocent conservative social-media users who appear to have been maliciously targeted by Twitter abusers. The system is obviously broken and being exploited by vigilantes who oppose everything the engagement-enhancing ethos of Twitter stands for (or is supposed to stand for, anyway).

 

*******

 

Hmmm....there is that word again....fascist!  It certainly fits when describing these people.  One of the first things that the most famous fascist Hitler did when he declared himself dictator was to censor anything and everything that disagreed with his ideology from press releases..  Some things never change....

Bristol Palin Power - Exposing the Truth

It appears that young Bristol Palin has lit a hate-filled fire in the bellies of some liberal leftist progs and ObamaBorgBots who basically are telling her to "just shut up" on her blog.

I had my own run-in with a liberal wacko in the post Bristol Palin's Blog: Responding to the Viral Sensation, Loving my Brother.

You see, it all started with Bristol's post asking Obama to call her:

Bristol Palin's Blog: Mr. President, When Should I Expect Your Call?

Nice Deb has a post up that shares the details about the media frenzy over Bristol's now gone viral request.

There are over 360 comments in the thread where I posted two comments. Fortunately, most of the comments at the blog are uplifting and positive towards Bristol's essays. But as usual, there are liberal leftist haters who just can't resist mocking and spewing their hatred towards her and her family. Here is a copy of my brief conversation with a Palin hater:

Gilly Mac says:

March 20, 2012 at 3:39 pm


Really, Bristol? It is so telling that all you care about is the number of times your post has been read or shared. “Viral beyond my wildest dreams.” SMH Don’t you have more important things to do than make up this fake outrage, and allow yourself to be used by your mother’s political staff? Yikes.

Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but there is no need for you to pimp out your son and disabled brother while expressing them. Having a disabled family member does not insulate you from disagreement or criticism. Certainly they are beautiful kids and nobody with a heart would say anything negative about them, but that doesn’t mean you need to keep bringing them up. I know you are getting what you want by inserting yourself into the public discourse this way – ATTENTION. I also know you won’t take this good advice, but you should: go to school, get educated, be a good mother, and keep your child out of the public eye.

*******

Christinewjc says:
March 20, 2012 at 8:10 pm
Gilly Mac wrote, “Everyone is entitled to their opinions.”

Let me share my opinion about everything else you wrote in your comment “Gilly.”

You pretend to know the motivation behind Bristol’s exclamation that her post “went viral.” Is it possible that she was happy that her message went further than this blog so that it will help educate more and more people about this particular issue? Claiming that Bristol’s outrage is “fake” looks like your attempt to just demean her views. Your nasty “pimp” comment is only designed to hurt her. My guess? Your silly accusations absolutely fall flat.

Gilly Mac wrote, “Certainly they are beautiful kids and nobody with a heart would say anything negative about them, but that doesn’t mean you need to keep bringing them up.”

I agree with you that “anyone with a heart would not say anything negative about them.” But we live in the real world. Children who are verbally abused and made fun of – for whatever reason – NEED to be brought to the attention of society at large for the simple reason that they NEED DEFENDING.

I don’t have a disabled child, but I worked with a family who had a severely disabled child (back when I was in high school). There was a technique called “patterning” back then which was an experiment to help the child regain motor skills. Unfortunately, it didn’t work. I heard only a few years later that cute, drooling, smiling, little disabled boy died. It broke my heart. Those few weeks of contact with him and his family changed my heart forever.

So you see, Gilly Mac, there is a purpose involved here with Bristol’s attempt to bring awareness on several issues…including her Downs Syndrome little brother, her teenage pregnancy and birth, and her advocacy against the terrible and degrading misogynist “jokes” that Bill Maher spews. Calling out Obama on his former claim that children of political persons should be “off limits” (except if the child is from a conservative or Republican family) is a great point to make. It shows the blaring hypocrisy that often lives in the leftists of this nation. It is very unfortunate.

I congratulate Bristol for having the courage to speak her mind on this and other issues. Keep up the great work young lady and don’t ever let the naysayers get you down.

For someone like you, “Gilly Mac,” to lecture her on what she should and should not say is hypocritical and demonstrates that you have a liberal leftist mindset that wants to shut out the free speech efforts of those with whom you disagree.

*******

Gilly Mac says:

March 21, 2012 at 8:48 am


LOL. Bristol has the right to speak, just as I have the right to disagree. They are BOTH our free speech rights. Sadly, Bristol is certainly not writing these, so we’re all just playing into Sarah Palin’s ego. The Palin’s love to attack people, and then when called on it, play the victim (like putting gun sights on Gabrielle Giffords back, and then when she is shot and nearly killed, make a self-righteous video about POOR YOU). Here, Bristol seems content to use her son and disabled brother to gain some sort of sympathy for herself. The President has defended the Palin children in the past. However, it is not his problem if they keep trying to be pseudo celebrities at ever turn. When conservatives start condemning the incredible amount of hatefulness and bigotry coming from “their side,” then they’ll have a moral leg to stand on. Instead, they whine, and point to Bill Maher and yell, “He said mean stuff, too!!!” Please spare us. People might take the Palin’s seriously if Sarah Palin

Christinewjc says:

March 21, 2012 at 1:03 pm


gilly mac,

Thanks for coming back and proving my point with your latest diatribe. You have just added even more lies (e.g. the Gabrielle Giffords whopper) to your previous hate filled rant. I suggest that you stop getting your brainwashing propaganda points from places like “Media Matters.” The ugliness that you continue to spew only makes you look mean, foolish, pathetic, bigoted, sad and uninformed about the real world.

*******


A commentator named John Frank had a good response:

John.Frank says:

March 20, 2012 at 4:01 pm

This comment is a classic example of the hatred that Bristol Palin spoke about in her post.
Bristol Palin points out the President’s double standard towards misogyny in a straight forward and well written blog post.

The post goes viral in a huge way.
A Front-Row Seat To Palin Power

So, Bristol Palin writes a post about what has happened, and someone immediately shows up and writes down their hate.

P.S. Excellent post Bristol Palin. Keep speaking out on subjects that are important to you and other young women across America.

Well said!

Hat tips to all links.

*******

In other news:

Now The End Begins

The NFL’s Pigskin Prophet Tim Tebow Signs With New York Jets

Diane Sawyer Is Factually Inaccurate About Islam on 20/20

Oh my gosh!!! I am only through the first nine minutes of the video Answering Muslims.com -
Whitewashing Islam: 20 Errors on 20/20, and it is UNBELIEVABLE HOW FACTUALLY INACCURATE hostess Diane Sawyer and the entire group of people being interviewed on the segment were on the ABC program!

Just goes to show how terribly WRONG the media of mass deception can be when they DON'T REALLY KNOW THE SUBJECT MATTER or, are TRYING TO PROMOTE A PROPAGANDIST TYPE OF PROGRAM to an unsuspecting public!

While typing this, I have been listening to the rest of the video. It's such a propaganda tool FOR Islam and the terrorism that is used both overtly, and covertly, in order to lull the American public into complacency about the so-called "religion of peace." The misnomer of "myths" about Islam included in the broadcast would be humorous if this wasn't such a serious topic!! The 20/20 program was so unbelievably biased against America and FOR Islamic lies -  it is ABSOLUTELY ASTOUNDING!!!

Unfortunately, I am currently unable to re post the video at this blog, so please visit Answering Muslims.com - Whitewashing Islam: 20 Errors on 20/20 and view the video.  I encourage you to return to this blog with your thoughts, comments, and opinions about what you saw and heard on the video!


Hat tip:

Answering Muslims

Obama uses Prayer Breakfast to Promote Political Agenda

While forcing myself to listen to Obama at the National Prayer Breakfast, it was so obvious that Obummer just had to turn it into a political campaign speech. Is nothing sacred anymore?

Bobby Eberle of GOP USA sums it up quite well:

Obama uses Prayer Breakfast to Promote Political Agenda.

Some of what Obama said sounded good (especially when he spoke of Billy Graham)...until he went off the prayer breakfast radar screen and became, once again, the bitter "Criticizer in Chief" in a not so subtle way; which immediately ruined the good parts that he previously spoke within the speech. Obama just cannot control himself! Absolutely EVERYTHING has to end in a fight against his political enemies!!

If President George W. Bush ever did such a thing at a prayer breakfast, the liberal left lunatics of the media of mass deception would have been HOWLING at the moon in anger! But when their "guy" does it...it's OK??

I can't think of a time when Obama has ever said anything remotely nice, encouraging, uplifting, inspiring and most of all INCLUSIVE of conservative Americans...can you?

All he does is play the "race card," the "rich vs. poor card," the "anti-conservative Americans card" (recall the "waving tea bags" and other demeaning statements spoken against the TEA Party while he praised the Occupy Wall Street thugs who have caused deaths, property damage, rapes, crime, squalor in the streets and millions of dollars of police protection and clean up??) the "haves and have-nots card," the "tax the rich card," the "blame the Congress card"...I could go on for pages and pages!

Well, I guess if one loses the support of a top Hollywood liberal like Brad Pitt (supposedly supporting Ron Paul), there is nothing left to do but play every nasty, negative card in the evil liars liberal leftist deck against conservatives.

Mr. Eberle writes:

Hello! There's a difference in talking about the "poor in spirit" and the reference that Obama made. But he didn't stop there. As noted in the Washington Post, Obama added the following:

"I think to myself, if I'm willing to give something up as somebody who's been extraordinarily blessed, and give up some of the tax breaks that I enjoy, I actually think that's going to make economic sense," Obama told the audience. "But for me, as a Christian, it also coincides with Jesus's teaching that 'for unto whom much is given, much shall be required.'"

Who funds the government? Who pays the VAST majority of taxes? Much already is required, and for Obama to suggest that Jesus would be on his side in supporting even higher taxes is simply wrong.

The comments particularly riled Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch.

Hatch also references Obama's direct attack on the Catholic church with his mandate to require religious institutions to provide insurance coverage for abortive drugs and other services for their employees that are in clear violation of those institutions' religious beliefs.

Hatch summed up his feelings by saying:

The President's comments this morning share more with political strategy than they do the religious beliefs of most Americans. In 2008, the President declared that his nomination was the world historical moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal. Someone needs to remind the President that there was only one person who walked on water. And he did not occupy the Oval Office.

For someone who is so overtly anti-religious -- remember his 20 years under the guidance of Jeremiah Wright? -- Obama has no business interjecting politics into a prayer breakfast. He should stick to what he knows... dividing the country on race, income, gender, and whatever else that can score him political points.

Hat tips to all links.

Liberal Lunatic Lemmings of Zero

Today's blog title reflects how I feel about the Obots who STILL support pResident Zero for re-election. They do so despite all of the corruption, lies, damage, out-of-control spending, Marxism, scandals (Operation Fast and Furious, Solyndra etc.), failed financial policies, terrible health care law, pro-death to babies in the womb, downsizing our military, homosexualizing the military, awful foreign policy, hatred of Israel, support for the terrorist group Muslim Brotherhood; as well as the expensive parties and vacations on taxpayer money, the golf outings and constant campaigning that Zero and his Marie Antoinette wife (with their king and queen attitudes) have done to damage our beloved nation! I have only mentioned a few points of destruction. The list is endless!! The LACK OF ABILITY TO LEAD THIS NATION by Zero and his cohorts is so obvious to anyone who isn't one of his Obot cult following FOOLS!!  At least former Chief of Staff William Daley had the good sense to jump ship this month!

I was flipping back and forth between C-Span's coverage of Zero's latest campaign rally and Fox News. Even though I can't stand to listen to man, it was interesting to hear how few people there were in the crowd. During the times that I was tuned to the channel, the camera did not pan the crowd. The clapping made it sound like a very sparse audience. But the lemmings* still applauded Zero's stupid (and un-kept) promises and teleprompter rhetoric. Zero continues to spew lies and these people fall for it! Even Zero himself stated that if he doesn't get his "promises" done that he would be a one term pResident. Great!! Quit now, in fact!!! I doubt that Biden would do any worse than the golfomaniac.

Obama's campaign rhetoric claims do not match his records. The bold-faced lies are contemptible! What's even worse and more disastrous is the foolish things that he HAS DONE AGAINST THE WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE over the past three awful years that he's been in office.

Maggie's Notebook has the latest on the formerly "secret" and expensive Halloween party that happened back in 2009, when unemployment was a dismal 10 percent in the nation.

The Imperial Obamas

What's even worse is the fact that American taxpayers shelled out over $4,000,000 for their recent Hawaii vacation!!


Excerpt:

For years we have experienced the antics of the Obama Family and their over-the-top spending sprees. From multimillion dollar vacations (The last one to Hawaii cost the taxpayer over $4 million.), to the menus of Kobe beef and lobster, to the clothing bill for Michelle Obama (Her sundress cost $2000.), but that is nothing compared to what has emerged in a recent book about Michelle Obama. Their over-the-top Halloween Party.

Read the entire article HERE.

If people have been that ignorant not to realize the the Media of Mass Deception has been in the pocket of the puppet Zero and his puppet master GeorgEVIL Soros, then this revelation should be proof positive on that fact! I sincerely hope that you are motivated to share this important information with everyone you know! Our nation cannot afford another four years with Zero, M.O. Antoinette, and GeorgEVIL!!

I like how the author over at Maggie's Notebook concluded his post:

It is beyond comprehension that the Main Lame Stream Media was ignorant of a party this size in the White House. The fact that this was NOT reported by the media only demonstrates the close relationship the media has with the Obamas. A relationship that has put the media into the Obama’s re-election campaign working as their propaganda mill. Is it no wonder that this was not reported on. Could you imagine the Bush family (Either George H W or George W) having a party of this magnitude without the media crying about it. In fact they would have complained about the party (which looked like a promo for Tim Burton’s Alice In Wonderland) for years. And they scream that they are impartial. Right!

Remember, the Media of Mass Deception is a PROPAGANDA MILL! You would be wiser to pay close attention to the blogs - Conservative blogs for the TRUTH, and the liberal lunatic blogs to recognize the lies - and who are just shills for the propaganda mill.

Hat Tip:

Maggies Notebook: The Imperial Obamas

*Word Origin & History

lemming

"small arctic rodent," 1607, from Norw. lemming, from O.N. lomundr "lemming." Perhaps from Lapp luomek. Fig. sense (in reference to their mass migrations that sometimes end in plunges into the sea) is from 1959.

*******
Additional Must Reads:

Nice Deb: New RNC Ad - Obama's Failed Promises

The Gateway Pundit: White House Says They Released Video of Extravagant “Alice in Wonderland” Party – The White House Lied

Also see more photos at The Blaze:

The Blaze: These Are the Pictures of The White House‘s ’Alice in Wonderland’ Party

Since I really dislike Halloween and all that it stands for, I tend to agree with this commentator over at The Blaze:

PlowMan
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:41am
Just makes my stomach turn to see the painting of Lincoln with all those silly props. I guess this is ok though, that is if the president paid for it from his own money. (which I highly doubt) Wonder what the media would have said if it would have been a Republican that did this? Hmmmmm…………. I wonder?

I join in with this question:

And I Say
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:43am
where are the photos of the military children?

This is truly sad to find out:

Michelle Obama’s Resentment of “White Irish Catholics” Similar to Barack’s Hateful Comments On “White Folks’ Greed” (Video)

posted by Jim Hoft at The Gateway Pundit - 4 hours ago

Remember: Racism is a one-way street. A new book on the Obama’s reveals that Michelle Obama was distressed about the “white Irish Catholics” in Illinois. Michelle Obama worked in the mayor’s office in the ...

Is It OK For Black Athletes to Be Unabashedly Christian, But Not Whites?

For quite some time now I had been wondering why certain people of a certain race can freely express their Christian faith openly in the professional sports arena, yet another person of a different race gets criticized, scrutinized, blasted, mocked, shunned and even verbally assaulted because of his faith.

After reading Three Ugly Truths Exposed by the Tebow Assault article over at American Thinker, I found one commenter who apparently had been wondering the same thing.

Comment from American Thinker:

T.S. Yesterday 03:10 AM

The discrepancy between media coverage of NBA players' public religiosity vs. Tebow's public religiosity doesn't have anything to do with the NBA being more open to (Christian) religion or traditional values than the NFL. It's about race. It's OK for black people -- basketball players, football players, entertainers, politicians, etc. -- to be openly Christian. It's not, however, OK for white people to be openly Christian. And yes, it's really that simple. That's why it's OK for Barack Obama to go to Jeremiah Wright's church, but not OK for Rick Santorum, Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry or George W. Bush to go to church.

Now don't be mistaken, the media and the arbiters of our culture don't actually like the fact that Christianity is still strong in the black community. They'd much prefer if blacks were secular and/or antagonistic toward Christianity. Black Islam has historically been celebrated (aside from Louis Farrakhan's anti-Semitism), but black Christianity is still tolerated. And the reason it's tolerated because it's, well, black. So since the "mainstream" media can't attack black Christians, they double up on white Christians.

The one thing that commenter "T.S." left out is the fact that it is NOT alright for a conservative black Christian man or woman to speak of his/her faith in the public arena of politics. The blacks who are left alone regarding their religious faith in Christianity are usually leftist, Democrats that the secular progressives (sec-progs) just about tolerate in public. I wonder whether or not the rabid sec-progs mock them in secret?

The hatred often spewed towards those (of ANY race, color, nationality etc.) who express their BIBLICAL Christian faith openly, share the gospel freely, and aren't ashamed of Jesus Christ has continually been ratcheted up every year. The times here in the U.S. where the media has a field day attacking the Christian faith is very apparent during the Christmas and Easter seasons.  The Bible tells us that such things are prophesied as "the signs of the times" and will increase as we get closer to the Rapture and subsequent return of Jesus Christ.

Have you noticed that the disgusting excuse for a "man" - the wretched Bill Maher - curses and mocks a white Christian young man like Tebow, and still keeps his job at HBO? I will NEVER subscribe to HBO ever again. I dropped it decades ago, mostly because their programming was even offensive back then. And now that they have this despicable little man Maher employed there, I'm glad that they don't get any money from our family. Since I don't watch Maher, but only hear of his rants via the news media, I wonder whether or not he has ever verbally abused a black Christian man (who isn't conservative) who publicly displays his faith in Jesus Christ after any pro-sporting event victory?

If the answer is "no", then why the double standard? Could it only have to do with race? Or is there something more that we should consider?

Maybe BubbaBBQ has a good point:

...Now you have Tim Tebow. Do they embrace him? Nope! Why? He is different. He isn't pretty, he is clean cut, he deflects all glory directed to himself and is very humble. And he is unabashedly Christian. Funny how the analysts all hate him and yet he wins over fans, teammates and foes alike.

Comments? Questions? Opinions?

Hat Tips:

American Thinker

Now The End Begins

*******

In other news:

Newsbusters:
99 Percent? Top 25 Occupy Wall Street Backers Worth Over $4 Billion.

Excerpt:

Occupy Wall Street attacks income inequality and the richest 1 percent, adopting as its slogan ''we are the 99 percent.'' In October, its protesters staged a ''millionaires march' 'in New York City, parading to the homes of wealthy citizens such as Rupert Murdoch and David Koch. But only some riches bother the Occupiers, who have ignored the massive wealth of celebrities in their own ranks.
The top 25 richest celebrities supporting Occupy Wall Street, according to the website Celebrity Net Worth, possess a combined net worth just over $4 billion.
While JP Morgan and Chase banker Jamie Dimon (worth $200 million) was one of the targets of the ''millionaires march,'' he has a net worth less than five of the celebrities supporting OWS.
That's not surprising. Many of the celebrities supporting Occupy Wall Street seem to be oblivious to the amount of wealth they possess.
Comedienne Roseanne Barr, (worth $80 million), was quoted quite literally calling for the heads of wealthy, declaring:''I do say that I am in favor of the return of the guillotine and that is for the worst of the worst of the guilty. I first would allow the guilty bankers to pay, you know, the ability to pay back anything over $100 million [of] personal wealth because I believe in a maximum wage of $100 million. And if they are unable to live on that amount of that amount then they should, you know, go to the re-education camps and if that doesn't help, then being beheaded.''
Barr inadvertently called for the heads of 13 celebrities supporting the Occupy Wall Street who make more than $100 million from singer Miley Cyrus to writer Stephen King.

Since Roseanne Barr's name could be included in the definition of words like CRAZY and IGNORANT, please read the entire article at
Newsbusters for more liberal secular prog. hypocrisy by celebrities.

Also see Nice Deb: Top 25 Celebrity Occupy Wall Street Supporters Have Combined Net Worth Over $4 Billion…
which includes an interview she did with one "occupier."

So....why don't these EXTREMELY RICH celebrities who supposedly support the OWS movement re-distribute THEIR OWN WEALTH to help these people....HMMMMM????

The hypocrisy is really laughable; but at the same time it is so sad because these people have been severely duped by GeorgEVIL Soros and ObaMARXIST.

More “Free-Speech” Sleight-of-Hand From Obama Regime

With all the news coverage on Hurricane Irene, it might be easy to miss one of the more recent sleight-of-hand tactics recently employed by the Obamafraud regime.


Recall the Fairness Doctrine. One commentator over at NewsBusters said it well:

Fairness?
Submitted by ruby2ssday on Tue, 08/23/2011 - 5:01pm.

The "Fairness Doctrine" has nothing to do with fairness. It is to protect the speech of radical minorities and overpower those who promote rational debate.

It has been pushed upon the American people since way back in 1949 by the progressive loonies who thought that Americans wouldn't notice their deceitful practices. To be brief, the Fairness Doctrine was a misnomer that claimed talk radio needed to be balanced by providing the same amount of lefty progressive commentators as there are right conservative commentators. It was imposed to ensure the broadcasters gave equal time to differing political opinions.

The trouble is, when implemented, the lefty talk shows had far fewer listeners than the conservative ones anyway! Many of the failed progressive radio shows were cancelled. Therefore, demanding that "equal time to differing political opinions" be imposed made the loony lefties think that they would get the upper hand in talk radio.


The Obama gangster government tried to instill this stupid doctrine, once again, earlier in the beginning of this regime. Didn't work. Too many people were on to them and prevented the FCC from implementing it again.


Fast forward to August, 2011. It was announced by the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) that the "the Fairness Doctrine is now officially dead." Sounds good, right? Not so fast! Take a look at this email letter I recently received that tells the truth of the matter:

From the Desk of:
David Martin, Executive Vice President
Media Research Center

August 25, 2011

Christine,

More “free-speech” sleight-of-hand is coming from the Obama Administration. Early this week, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced they were doing away with what we have called the Censorship Doctrine - the so-called “Fairness” Doctrine. This federal doctrine, a relic from 1949, was imposed to ensure the broadcasters gave equal time to differing political opinions.

Great news, right? Not so fast . . .

According to Media Research Center founder Brent Bozell, the FCC “deserves one-handed applause” for the move. Before striking the politically volatile “Fairness Doctrine,” the FCC implemented rules of “localism,” “media diversity,” and a nebulous requirement to “serve the public interest.” All designed to empower the FCC to limit speech they don’t like.
As Brent points out, “the path to censor radio airwaves has been long paved through the back door.”

Click here to read Brent’s statement and then here to take action with the MRC.


+ + Speech isn’t free if it’s under government control

The FCC is making a big deal about the repeal of the “Fairness Doctrine, because they have put other tools in place to accomplish the same goals. Among others, these tools are “localism” and “diversity.”

Christine, under the nefarious concept of localism, unelected and unaccountable statists at the FCC could in regulate how much time broadcasters must dedicate to so-called local issues (as defined by the FCC) – in effect limiting the amount of time they can give to programming their listeners want to hear.

Under government mandated “diversity” in station ownership, a station owner could have his application to renew his license denied for no reason other than there being a lack of minority owned stations in their listening area. Across the rest of the federal government the people working as affirmative action bean counters have consistently shown that their ultra left-wing belief system takes priority over the rule of law.

Generations of American soldiers, sailors and marines didn’t die so that the First Amendment could be repealed by overpaid government employees at the FCC. These regulations do not exist for their stated purpose. They exist only a sneaky means for leftists in the permanent federal bureaucracy to control what the American people can hear.

The threats of government control and censorship are alive and well in the U.S. The free speech rights of EVERY American are threatened -- not to mention the fate of political free speech on radio airwaves!

Liberals know that silencing us will help them to advance their socialist agenda -- unchallenged and under the radar.

That’s why the MRC proactively launched our national grassroots petition to protect and preserve the free speech rights of Americans. Through this petition, Americans from all walks of life have the opportunity to answer back to the Obama Administration’s backdoor efforts to silence and suppress dissent!

Click here now and stand for free speech. [Note from Christine - SIGN THIS PETITION!]

By signing this petition, you will join with almost half a million American citizens who want their individual free speech rights defended and protected from government intrusion! Our great nation was built upon free and open discourse, and to remain a great nation this ideal must be protected and preserved at all costs.
After signing, please alert your friends -- urging them to follow your lead.



Thank you in advance for your efforts!




David

P.S: Alert your friends today. Forward this message to 25-30 friends urging them to read Brent Bozell’s statement and take action to protect and preserve our free speech right.

Well, I've done my job by signing the petition (at above link) and alerting the up to 100 visitors that come to this blog on any given day. I hope that you will pass this information along to others, too.


Let these liars know that WE WON'T GET FOOLED AGAIN!


Thanks,
~ Christine

Hat tips to all links.

 

Fox News Purposely Sabotaging Palin

The following link certainly explains why Fox News Channel did a 180 degree turn against their own Fox News Commentator, Sarah Palin. The Post & Email: Is Fox News Out to Sabotage Governor Palin?

After reading the article, I think that we may all know exactly why this has happened.

No one can put Sarah Palin in a box. No one controls her. Perhaps Roger Ailes originally thought he could, but when he found out how mistaken he was, he systematically set out to join the chorus of leftist libtards and began the process of deliberately sabotaging her! This is truly DESPICABLE!!

Isn't this a truly sad state of affairs? Sarah Palin has enough fiery darts being thrown at her by the rest of the Media of Mass Deception!! How disheartening to find out that Fox News is now joining in with the evil nemesis of Palin derangement syndrome haters!

Even though I didn't agree with Hillary Clinton's political views, it was so obvious that she was sabotaged by her own party back during the 2008 primary. I thought that was awful, too.

Who are these people???

If Sarah Palin toughs it out and runs for president, I think that it would be the first step in getting away from the powers-that-be who have had a death grip of control over Washington D.C. for decades.

On the other hand, if Sarah Palin decides not to run for president, she will be a formidable figure in steering conservatives towards the best GOP candidate in the race.

Shame on Roger Ailes and all the reporters and pundits (except Sean Hannity and Greta Van Susteren) who are in on the fix to sabotage the former governor! When Glenn Beck's program is discontinued at the end of June, it will be difficult for me to support Fox News anymore. The combination of finding out about the deliberate sabotage of Sarah Palin and the ignorant decision to let Glenn Beck go (although he will most likely move on to bigger and better things!!) has caused a bad taste in my mouth and has increasingly soured my stomach towards that news station. I suppose that I will just continue getting my news from the many excellent blogs on my blog roll.

America? Please wake up!! Whether you like Sarah Palin or not, can't you see what is happening here?? If you are a lefty who wanted Hillary as the Dem nominee, recall what happened to her! PLEASE DON'T LET THE POWERFUL LEFTIST ELITES CONTINUE TO SABOTAGE INDIVIDUAL CITIZENS!! WAKE UP AND REALIZE THAT THEY ARE TRYING TO SABOTAGE OUR AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE, TOO!

DO THE RIGHT THING!!

Mat 10:26 "Therefore do not fear them. For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known.

Luk 8:17 "For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor [anything] hidden that will not be known and come to light.

Luk 12:2 "For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, nor hidden that will not be known.

Hat Tip:

The Post and Email

Chopra Mocks Palin? ReasonandFaith1 Returns the Favor! [Update!]

While listening to Glenn Beck's radio program this morning, I heard about Deepak Chopra's ranting article against Sarah Palin. Gateway Pundit has the story and links, so I will just provide some insight that I learned about Chopra years ago.

Back in January, 2005, Deepak Chopra appeared on Lee Strobel's television program,  Faith Under Fire and debated Christian Apologist Greg Koukl on the topic of "The Future of Faith."

As a recipient of Greg's email alerts I received an email telling me the date, time and channel of the program. Greg also stated the following in his email:

I think you'll find the discussion stimulating and revealing. I think it's also a great opportunity for the Kingdom. Please pray there will be a powerful impact from the exchange between Chopra and me.

Greg
--
"I have come in to the world to bear witness to the truth."--Jesus, John 18:37

My initial reaction to the show:

Great show!

This broadcast was absolutely fabulous! Greg Koukl pointed out the fact that people can have differing beliefs regarding faith, but that it is logically impossible for them all to be true at the same time. His trust in Jesus Christ and God's Word stood in direct contrast to Deepak Chopra who admitted "embracing his uncertainty." Koukl's view demonstrates a steadfast and true faith where Chopra's view can only lead to theological oblivion.
__________________
Christine

See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ. Colossians 2:8

The eyes of the Lord move to and fro throughout the earth to show Himself strong to those whose hearts are fully committed to Him. 2 Chronicles 16:9

I gathered some additional comments over at my Talk Wisdom forum:

Messengers of an Impersonal God?
I watched Greg Koukl and Deepak Chopra discuss the future of faith on Lee Strobel's Faith Under Fire last night. Dr. Chopra has written numerous books on New Age spirituality that have sold millions of copies. Greg did a superb job of representing the gospel in content and character, modeling the qualities of an ambassador that he and the folks at Stand to Reason seek to instill in others. He repeatedly demonstrated the problems with religious relativism and exposed the fact that, contrary to his denial that he is dogmatic, Dr. Chopra adheres to a theological position of which he seeks to persuade others.

As a sign of respect for Jesus, Dr. Chopra said that his teaching in the Sermon on the Mount is among his favorites and that he carries a copy of it with him. However, he considers Jesus only one among a number of God's messengers. Not only is this a contradiction of the biblical witness to Jesus' uniqueness, it's also unintelligible given Dr. Chopra's own concept of the nature of God. You see, Dr. Chopra emphatically denies that God is a personal being.

The concept of messenger presupposes two activities, both of which can only be performed by persons. The first is that of sending or commissioning. The summer before I went to college I worked as a messenger for a law firm in Manhattan. They sent me and my co-workers on various assignments to deliver important documents to other firms and businesses. I didn't decide what my destination was to be. Nor did I decide at what times I would go on these errands. All of that was dictated to me by my employer. A messenger is one who is sent by someone not something.

The second activity presupposed by the concept of messenger is communication. A messenger is one who conveys a what? That's right - a message. The task of a messenger is to convey some kind of communication from the one who sent him or her to the recipient. If I were to tell you that my toaster wanted me to tell you something, you'd think that I was either joking or something was seriously wrong with me. That's because we know that toasters and other impersonal entities don't communicate. So, how Dr. Chopra explains the concept of an impersonal God having messengers, I don't know. I don't think he can.

I wouldn't be surprised if Greg offers some more detailed analysis of the exchange at STR's blog so keep an eye out for it.

Posted by KP

***********

Greg Koukl r0x0rz da hizzy
I only got to see from about 20 minutes after the hour, but Greg Koukl of Stand to Reason graciously, fairly, kindly, steamrolled Deepak Chopra on Faith Under Fire last night. I mean, it wasn't even fair. Wasn't even close. TKO first round, except the fight kept going. I have no idea how Greg managed to wrangle the whole hour---the biggest draw-back to Faith Under Fire has been that you have to address big issues in picoseconds, and sometimes you just can't do that very well. So, to get the whole hour with a single "opponent" was quite the coup, and resulted in a much better encounter with a much clearer result.
I've heard from Faith Under Fire three times on three different topics. First program crashed and burned when my opponent backed out. Nothing came of the second two. Haven't heard anything in months now. I don't expect to, honestly (if you go over the guest list you'll see a few names that would explain my non-expectation), but as long as they get folks like Greg on there, they'll be doing well.

Posted by James R. White

****


In addition, SmartChristian's blog pointed out the obvious fact that "Deepak Chopra is simply a new age hindu."

Why am I sharing this with you? Because no matter what fake persona Chopra tries to present to his fans and readers of his books, the true person (emotionally, intellectually, and spiritually) often is exposed during an unnecessarily mean and cruel rant like the one he wrote against Sarah Palin.

Glenn stated some past quotes from Chopra on his radio program. I will try to locate the exact quotes and post them here. But they were similar to the idea that "we all should just get along" and "live in peace and harmony" and "not judge each other" etc. So...what did Chopra do in his angry rant against Sarah Palin? The exact opposite of his guru-type, transcendental meditation gobbledy-gook that he espouses in his books, tapes, interviews and website!

The debate between Koukl and Chopra went on for an entire hour. I found a portion of the program on YouTube, but the portion where Chopra stated that he "embraces his uncertainty" isn't in the clip.

Go here to see just 5 minutes of the debate:

"What is Truth?": Deepak Chopra Denies the Deity of Christ

Last but not least, since Chopra chose to mock Sarah Palin, I don't see any reason to not return the favor. The following 37 second video is truly a classic:


Deepak Chopra Gets Owned.

Hat Tips to all links.

*******

UPDATE!


Via Greg Koukl's Stand to Reason website, I found a link to the entire debate between Greg Koukl and Deepak Chopra!


Greg Koukl - Faith Under Fire with Lee Strobel: Greg Koukl exposes the flaws in Deepak Chopra's worldview

It will be worth your time to view the entire debate! It is one of the best I have have ever seen and heard!!

A Note To Sarah

I think that it is AWFUL that so many in the Media of Mass Deception are trying to pin blame on Sarah Palin for what that lunatic murderer did during his shooting rampage in Arizona. The following is what I recently wrote on Sarah Palin's FaceBook page:


Dear Sarah,

I heard your heartfelt response to Glenn Beck's letter to you on his radio show today where you denounced violence of any kind towards anyone. Thank you for being the very classy lady that you are and not falling for all the vitriole the rabid leftists spew at you.

I know that Jesus is your "Rock" and your faith in Him gets you through the ugly mess that people often sinfully cast against you. In this world of hateful rhetoric, you stand strong and above it all.

Our Lord loves you, and you love Him. No matter what the haters say about you and/or your family, they can NEVER take away what you and Todd have accomplished.

The Lord must have great things in store for you because the totally undeserved persecution going on against you is spoken of and revealed in the Bible about those who follow the Lord Jesus. I'm sure that through it all, the Lord Jesus is saying, "Well done, my good and faithful servant."

God bless you and your lovely family!

Sincerely,
Christine

Libs Using Tragic Event to Spark Anger?

Recall that Glenn Beck warned that the progressives would start a fight to try and get Conservatives, Independents, TEA Party Patriots, and Sarah Palin supporters (etc.) angry enough to cause people to resort to violence? Could the use of this terribly tragic event be the spark that they are using to try and do that?

Patriots, don't let them change you! Don't let them turn your (our) focus away from the plans we have to peacefully, and through voting and legal ways, bring our country back from the clutches of Soros, Obama & all their evil cohorts!

Remember to utilize the 4 E’s!
Enlightenment
Education
Empowerment
Entrepreneurship

Some of the evidence:

State-Run Media Interviews Friend of Shooter… Completely Ignores Her Claims That Shooter Was “Left-Wing” and “Quite Liberal” (Video)
posted by Jim Hoft at The Gateway Pundit - 1 hour ago
More deceit from the state-run media… ABC interviewed a friend of the Tucson gunman, Caitlin Parker. Yesterday Caitlin tweeted that Loughner was “far left” and “quite liberal.” If you thought that ABC woul...


Big Government
Arizona Massacre Exposes: Tea Party Is Afforded Less Benefit Of The Doubt Than Radical Islam! - What does the Ft. Hood massacre, and Saturday’s Arizona massacre have in common? Almost nothing. With Ft. Hood, an open islamist gunned down dozens in an a...

The Blaze - Stories
Washington Post Eugene Robinson Violent Rhetoric Comes Exclusively From The Right -

BREAKING: DEMOCRATS PLOTTED TO BLAME TEA PARTY FOR SLAUGHTER!
Posted by Jim Hoft on Sunday, January 9, 2011, 11:08 AM
Don’t ever let a horrible slaughter at a supermarket go to waste.

Big Journalism
As Arizona Shooting Story Unfolds, Media Already Blaming Tea Party/Sarah Palin - Even as the early, sketchy details of the shooting incident in Arizona were still emerging some members of the left-leaning media were already trying to ti...

NewsBusters.org - Exposing Liberal Media Bias
Within Minutes of Shooting, CNN Finds Local Liberal to Blame State's 'Rabid Right' and Gun 'Fetish' - Within minutes of reporting the horrific shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and other innocents in Tucson, as the early reports wrongly cited Giffords...

RedState
The Media & The Shooter - “*The tea party movement won* in November. *Winners don’t go on shooting sprees.*” This morning we pray for Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, her family, ...


A Time For Choosing
Listen Up Lefties: The Difference Between The DNC’s Bull’s-Eyes And Sarah Palin’s Surveyor’s Crosshairs - By Gary P Jackson The radical left and their allies in the media have been working over time trying to blame the tragic mass murder in Arizona Saturday mor...

Atlas Shrugs
Hitler Lover Loughner Targeted First Jewish Congresswoman from Arizona, Gabrielle Giffords - In this video, the Arizona political leftwing radical mass slaughterer, Jared Loughner, is dressed up as a terrorist as he sets the American flag on fire. Th...

Disgusting. AP Goes There… Blames Palin & Tea Party For Shootings By Marx-Supporting Liberal Lunatic
posted by Jim Hoft at The Gateway Pundit - 5 hours ago
Friends described shooter Jason Loughner as “far left” and “liberal.” For some reason that did not make the AP story. Federal Judge John M. Roll, a Bush appointee, was among the people fatally shot outside...

Two Sicknesses On Display in Arizona
posted by William A. Jacobson at Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion - 6 hours ago
The shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and the killing of several people by gunman Jared Loughner in Arizona yesterday has revealed two sicknesses. The first and most serious is the sickness liv...


Hat Tips to all links