Talk Wisdom's goal is to defend the tenets and values of Biblical Christian faith. We defend our Constitutional Republic and Charters of Freedom, especially when speaking out against destructive social and political issues. As followers of our Savior and Lord, we should boldly stand up for Jesus Christ in our present circumstances. He is our Savior, Lord, and King, and His love needs to be shed abroad in our hearts and in our world - now.
Showing posts with label Talk Wisdom Reports - You Decide. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Talk Wisdom Reports - You Decide. Show all posts
The title of this post is a question that several bloggers [like B'Man's Revolt, Fist of Freedom, and Moral Matters] are asking after some amazing photo stills and descriptions are shared at the links below.
All photos can be viewed at B'Man's Revolt blog link above. There is MUCH MORE at the site to make us re-think this entire scenario.
To be honest, I didn't want to think that this could have been a false flag event. But the evidence at that link could be considered quite convincing.
The first thing that caught my eye when I first saw the photos of the bloody scene (elsewhere, not at this particular site), was how unusually bright red-orange the blood looked on the pavement. It didn't look authentic to me. I have had cuts that dripped blood on my backyard cement pavement, and the blood in the photos didn't look anything like that color.
Just reading how these EMT professionals [at link above] felt about both the lack of blood in the first still frames (especially that lack of blood on the double amputee's left leg which was positioned over the black woman's shoulder at first) convinced me that something was very fishy.
Admittedly,
I had to look at the photos and read the paragraphs above each frame a few times in order to see and comprehend all that this blogger was reporting.
Excerpt:
Digger shared a link with me that contains a sequence of events from a video that focuses on the double amputee that supposedly had his legs blown off. I want to share those with you here and ask you, especially if you have any trauma medical background (in the Armed Forces or ER or whatever), what is wrong with these pictures? (pictures and narrative by Fist-Of-Freedom)
I’ve studied and graduated EMT-B certification with the state of Oregon. I’ve been on calls with heavy arterial bleeds, internal bleeding, fatalities, doa’s. I am speaking from direct personal experience with severe trauma.
Here is a telling photograph of the amputee actor. I encourage readers to view the photo side by side with my analysis.
If you lose both [of] your legs from explosive trauma, half of your blood is gone in one minute via the femoral arteries, you' re dead after two. Bleeding out is worse with blunt force trauma (like shrapnel) because flesh is torn rather than cut, exposing more arterial and vascular tissue. The human body holds 5 to 6 LITERS of blood. If that really happened you would see blood EVERYWHERE, the guy would be drenched in it. You would also see what’s called arterial spurting from the injury. Most likely he would vomit after turning ghost white from shock, then turning delirious or passing out. As for the “tourniquet”…
Its not even tied off, its suspended via gravity, which would literally do nothing to an arterial sever. There’s no pressure applied. There’s no knot with a turn stick for leverage. You can clearly see a gap in the nonexistent wrap job on his left inner thigh (left anterior proximal for you experts) His hands have no blood on them. There’s no blood on the ground. The color in his hands and lips shows good circulation.
This is an actor. This is staged. How did they pull it off though? I can show you.
Go HERE to see the photos and read the rest of the post.
B'Man's Revolt continues:
Something about this entire thing smells to high heaven. When have you ever heard of someone with a blown off leg not bleeding? Some make the claim that it was cauterized, but obviously, the picture of them wheeling the guy out on the wheelchair shows ‘blood and gore’ (a cauterization is a burn that seals the wound). Something changed between these images and when they wheeled him out in front of the cameras.
[When you get to the Fist-Of Freedom link, scroll down to "Fist of Freedom's" comment post.]
*******
So people...what do you think?
1. Christine - you're crazy! This event could never be staged! 2. It looks staged, but since the news reported everything it must all be real. 3. I don't see anything wrong in the photos at the links. 4. I have some doubts, but I'll stick to believing the propaganda...err...the official narrative. 5. How dare you share such accusations! The news media and this administration always reports the truth! 5. Other [state your case in comments].
P. S. One more thing. Take a look at a video taken of a police raid into one of the homes of the people who live in Watertown, MA during the so-called "Shelter in Place" announcement (a.k.a. Marshall Law). I thought it was disturbing.
No matter what you might believe about the Boston Marathon Terrorist Attack, there is merit to the admonition that one conservative commentator (I think it was Glenn Beck) stated when these big events happen.
Watch what the other hand is doing!
Case in point:
4th
Amendment Is Attacked During Boston Mayhem
As was the case in the Sandy Hook aftermath in which our Second Amendment rights were being attacked we now have an attack against our Fourth Amendments rights!!!
No freedom, no debate. In the midst of chaos of the Boston Marathon bomber
and the explosions in Texas, on Thursday, Americans moved closer to losing more
4th amendment rights when the House of Representatives passed the
Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA). This came after
Republican Mike Rogers (MI) held closed-door meetings with his Intelligence
Committee and disallowed debate on an amendment that would have required a
warrant for the government to spy on you.
CISPA now moves to the Senate.
The 4th Amendment protects you from unreasonable search and
seizure; but CISPA ends that protection online. It allows the government to
access confidential customer data from online service providers, without a
warrant and without evidence of criminal wrongdoing. Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO)
warned that the language allows the government to “go on fishing expeditions for
electronic devices,” for instance at “gun shows,” or “football games”—wherever a
great amount of people are gathering.
Michigan Republican Justin Amash tried to get an amendment passed ensuring
that privacy policies and terms of companies would remain valid and enforceable,
but was denied.
Interestingly enough, Mike Rogers, the man responsible for holding CISPA
meetings in secret and fighting so hard for its passage, has a big conflict of
interest.
Mike’s wife Kristi worked for a security defense contractor that would have
benefited from this legislation; and now, she’s managing director at a big
lobbying firm that focuses on “executive level problem solving in the defense
and homeland security sectors.”
So, our privacy, our rights, our 4th Amendment, was sold out in
favor of big State Department contracts.
What's wrong with CISPA? (in as few words as possible)
As it's written, CISPA won't protect us from cyber threats, but it will violate our 4th Amendment right to privacy:
It lets the government spy on you without a warrant. (read more)
It makes it so you can’t even find out about it after the fact. (read more)
It makes it so companies can’t be sued when they do illegal things with your data. (read more)
It allows corporations to cyber-attack each other and individuals outside of the law. (read more)
It makes every privacy policy on the web a moot point, and violates the 4th amendment. (read more)
When we say that your information can be shared with "The Government" it's not hyperbole. Federal Agencies from the Fish & Wildlife Service to Amtrak to the NSA could access your data. (read more)
You don't need me to tell you that this is really, really, bad people!!! We need to flood Congress with phone calls so they know: Violating our privacy is not an option. Vote NO on CISPA!
Memory Hole Blog has a new post up entitled: "Corporate Media’s “Lone Gunman” Storyline Losing Ground. This is another in a series of Talk Wisdom Reports - You Decide posts regarding the unanswered questions surrounding the Sandy Hook school massacre.
Excerpt:
A cross section of kill-to-injury ratios of major mass shootings suggests that if Adam Lanza acted alone in carrying out the Sandy Hook Elementary School carnage he was among the most accurate killers in modern history, exceeding even the lethal damage meted out by Al Capone’s machine gun-wielding henchmen in the infamous St. Valentine’s Day Massacre.
Note this chart [H/T Memory Hole Blog]:
Incident, # of shooters, weapon(s) used
Shot
Killed
Wounded
Kill-to-wounded ratio
SANDY HOOK (2012) 1 shooter, AR-15, .223
27
26 (96.2%)
1 (3.8%)
26:1
Aurora, CO (2012) 1 shooter, AR-15, .223
71
12 (16.9%)
59 (83%)
1:5
Tucson, AZ (2011) 1 shooter, Glock 9mm
14
6 (42.8%)
8 (57.1%)
1:1.2
N. Ill. U (2008) 1 shooter, 9mm
26
5 (20%)
21 ((80%)
1:4
Virginia Tech (2007) 1 shooter, 9mm pistol
49
32 (68%)
17 (32%)
2:1
Columbine, CO (1999) 2 shooters, 12 ga., 9mm
33
12 (36%)
21 (64%)
1:2
U. Iowa (1991) 1 shooter/.38 spec.
6
5 (83%)
1 (16%)
5:1
Stockton, CA (1989) 1 shooter AK-47
35
5 (14%)
30 (86%)
1:6
École Polytechnique/Montreal Massacre (1989) 1 shooter, Ruger Mini 14 .223
27
14 (52%)
13 (48%)
1.1:1
Cal. St. Fullerton (1976) 1 shooter .22 LR semi-auto
9
7 (78%)
2 (22%)
3.5:1
U. Texas Tower (1966) 1 shooter, various
48
16 (33%)
32 (67%)
1:2
St. Valentine’s Day Massacre (1929) 2 shooters, .45 submachine guns
7
6 (85.8%)
1 (14.2%)
6:1
Anyone can see why so many are questioning the "official story" (a.k.a. the media-of-mass-deception-and-corruption's version of events). Researchers are finding much evidence that demonstrated that the truth about the Newtown school shooting is being covered up.
Second excerpt:
Never mind the facts, however. The public has been repeatedly told by corporate news media that the December 14, 2012 incident was exclusively carried out by the awkward 20-year-old man with virtually no firearms or military training.
In the comment section, I found a link to Can Speccy.com which alerted me to a video tape found at Dr. Oz's website where a student who survived the massacre said in response to Dr. Oz's question, "When we were having a drill, we were hiding under, like..." The boy was abruptly interrupted by Dr. Oz who said for him to take his time; but then led him to discuss something else by asking a question about his teachers.
Dr. Oz: "Take your time. Don't hurry ... Let me ask you: what would you like to say to your teachers about Friday?
Yes, I remembered that a lot, a lot of policemen
were, um, in the school. Well, a lot, I was like hiding under ... When we
were having a drill, we were hiding under, like ...
Dr.
Oz:
Take your time. Don't hurry ... Let me ask you: what
would you like to say to your teachers about
Friday?
Louis:
I dunno, but. It's like ...
Dr.
Oz.
You appreciate your
teachers?
Louis:
Yeah.
So...was it a drill gone live and awry? Or was it all just a deception?
Indeed, as information recently pointed to by Digital Journal indicates,[2] in a widescale rush to judgment major news media have neglected vital information and statements from Connecticut state authorities suggesting that Lanza may have had accomplices.
In a December 26 court plea to postpone release of contents yielded through five search warrants, Connecticut State Attorney General Stephen Sedensky argued that unsealing such findings might “seriously jeopardize” the investigation by divulging evidence heretofore known only to other “potential suspects.”
Pointing to “information in the search warrant affidavits that is not known to the general public,” Sedensky also argued that opening the warrants would “identify persons cooperating with the investigation, thus possibly jeopardizing their personal safety and well-being.”
The prosecutor’s statement came less than two weeks after Connecticut State Police Lieutenant J. Paul Vance told reporters how there were “some cards that we’re holding close to our vest.”
In light of the above and alongside a wealth of additional evidence calling the “official story” into question, the corporate news media’s long-running and continued emphasis of the “lone gunman” narrative appears increasingly fraudulent. The question remains whether this is merely a case of slipshod reporting or part of a more intentional mass deception against the American public.
So many inconsistencies, unanswered questions, and strange behavior by those who did appear on camera after the Sandy Hook School massacre has led many bloggers to question the "official" story regarding what actually happened that day.
There are some researchers who are claiming that no children were actually killed and that it was a well planned out (2 year plan) "false flag" operation.
Others claim that the shooting and deaths did happen, but some (like Emilie Parker) were not killed because she appears in a photo with BHO after the tragedy.
*******
Update # 9 Here's another example of a fundraiser being put on on FaceBook on December 10, 2012
Since Im catching total hell from the peanut gallery of disbelievers...Let me again clarify.
Google time stamps show the original date of the post.
The FUNDRAISER website shows the time of the post down to the minute.
If you think this is somehow fake, please explain how someone fakes a GOOGLE time stamp. Your own personal website "time" has nothing to do with the Google timestamp.
These fundraiser sites are NOT blogs that allow you to change the time by the way.
See my fundraiser if you have any doubts.. its the same kind of fundraiser page as mine, just a different company.. same format and everything.
Sure anyone can change their blog to be whatever time zone they want.. date they want..
But if you make a post.. Google picks it up and puts it in the search based upon when it was posted "internet time" wise--- in otherwords, it doesn't matter what date you have on your blog, website etc...
When you post.. Google caches it as a post for 'that day'.
In this case.. 'that day' was December 10, 2012, four days before the shooting.
This is not the only site either.. there are others.
This is one of the better examples of a full match between Google Cache AND the website date/time.
again, here is just one example of many.. for sure you'll see old posts with secondary titles come up.. but then you'll see fundraising sites and a few others with December 5th, 10th, and 11th POSTING DATES.. not blog dates.
You Caring.com
Be sure to read the new information shared at the website. It includes info about Carver (see strange interview below this update). The author at the link is not a crazed conspiracy theorist. In fact, if you do a search you will find hundreds of thousands of links were people are questioning the "official" story on Sandy Hook.
Note: The above article as well as the other articles linked above are open ended and independent investigations. Information is ever changing in the investigation as we establish the facts and weed out the disinformation.
Naturally, some of the facts originally posted in the investigation may change and as they do we will update the reports. This investigation is in no way closed and any individual detail within the investigation should not be taken as 100% fact as details really do continue to change.
It is also important to note and counter the claim that investigating the shooting is a disgrace to those who were murdered. In fact, the truth of the matter is actually the exact opposite. We truly believe the best way to honor whoever did actually die is to investigate the event, something the corporate controlled media has refused to do. We have not undertaken this investigation to hurt any of the victims family members, we are simply seeking the truth, WHEREVER that may take us.
You can help us separate the facts from the disinformation by sending any information you may have to us by commenting below or sending us an email.
*******
Update #6 [Found this link within the first "Related Reports" at the Intelhub blog link above in Update #5.]
Memory Hole Blog.com: The Sandy Hook Massacre: Unanswered Questions and Missing Information
This looks like the original site of the article (which I originally found on Daily Thought Pad blog) and belongs to the professor who was "outed" by Anderson Cooper on CNN as a "crazy conspiracy theory" person.
The "About" page at Memory Hole Blog:
The site is authored and maintained by James F. Tracy PhD, Associate Professor of Media Studies at Florida Atlantic University.*******
Then we have the coroner who held the most bizarre press conference I have ever seen!
All of this bothers me...immensely!!
I was thinking that if this current BADministration could get away with the Fast and Furious gun scandal, the Benghazi gun running scandal from Libya to Syria where things apparently went awry and four Americans ended up dead, and the Drone killings ordered by BHO that have killed over 2,000 people (including women and children); then this BADministration must be entirely emboldened to think that they could get away with something as awful as a school shooting and disgustingly use it as propaganda in order to change the minds of the American people to support gun control - or even gun confiscation!
I recall hearing on one TV broadcast report (I don't think it was Fox News because I was at another home where it wasn't on at the time) [early in the investigation] that "an entire classroom was missing." Now, that could have been the students who were hiding in a closet (? I think?) or was it a bathroom?? with their teacher, but how would so many children fit in a closet unless it was huge (or a bathroom)? In the YouTube video (above link) interview, "Roig" said she hid them in a bathroom.
Admittedly, I don't have the time, skills, nor expertise to do all the research that would be necessary. I have already posted at least two or three blog posts about the incident that contained links to other blogs, YouTube videos etc. which showed the inconsistencies, unanswered questions, and strange behaviors that have been noticed by many other bloggers, too.
With a complicit lame stream media of mass deception, we can't be sure of anything anymore!
However, if you want to take the time to read at the following two links (or, you can view/hear a 2 hour video synopsis at either link) you might join me in questioning the "official" story about Sandy Hook.
I was tipped off about helicopter footage of the Sandy Hook Incident Before The Shooting Started........ This Is That Footage..... Please Download This Before The Powers remove it.
No ambulances present, the fire engine i have been told has Detroit On It.. Please look out for the police car with no police department marked on it.. this footage came from a major news site.. This footage proves NO shooting took place... Nobody died... This is damming evidence..I am sorry about my voice as I have a sore throat from the chem trails.
*******
Update #3:
[Note: I don't know why the narrator is blaming George Bush??]
Next:
Update # 4:
Comment in the thread:
Re: Anderson Cooper: "Newtown conspiracy theorists are sickening."
Do yall see what is happening?
Its as clear as the Sandy Hook Hoax.
Do you think these people would waste one second mentioning US.. "the conspiracy nuts" unless they had an agenda?
They are building the conspiracy propaganda on purpose.
The old saying "There is no such thing as bad publicity" was made for a reason.
They are going to bring us into the public eye... demonize us, then after the sheep start to question on their own... they are going to disclose AWESOME VIDEO EVIDENCE! YES... video evidence!
Why do you think the school has been closed and on lock down since the day of the shooting? Why do you think no one is allowed near the school?
Answer: They set up inside the school "after the fact" and Hollywood fake moon landing style recorded "footage" that they can disclose later. This footage, rest assured will include some remarkably clear shots of all the points they are pushing. Including a bunch of shots of a skinny dude with a mask on. A shit load of video of a nice shiny AR-15 "MILITARY KILLING MACHINE assault rifle!
Everyone of the people they claim died... that you seen OBVIOUS fake interviews with relatives or friends are alive and are CIA planted. Thats why we havent seen one shot of a crime scene. Not one shot of blood. Not one shot of a dead body. Nothing... because there was NOTHING to show you.
They will have had all the time needed to fix us a nice shiny remarkably clear video.
Im calling it now. Wait and see. These [vulgarity redacted] fudged this job up so bad its almost laughable.
What WE... meaning the awakened "conspiracy theory" nuts have to do is SPREAD THIS INFO TO EVERY ONE YOU CAN GET TO SIT LONG ENOUGH TO VIEW IT!
Why should you be concerned?
Because your very FREEDOM to 'conspire' against something your told to believe is on the line.
The agenda is to remove our firearms.... which will lead to stopping the 'conspiracy' loons...which in turn will end up shutting every conspiracy site, personal blog, contradictory
web site down for good!
We will be silenced and prosecuted!
For the sake of our children's future.... their freedoms ect... WE HAVE GOT TO EXPOSE THIS HOAX TO THE MASSES!
This hoax has the potential the end up OUR 9/11 ... allowing us to take back our freedoms.
God bless
(If you want to know how this went down... here ya go)
Behold a Pale Horse, 1991, Whistle blower William Cooper, R.I.P., page 225 – He writes,
“The government encouraged the manufacture and importation of military firearms for the criminals to use. This is intended to foster a feeling of insecurity, which would lead the American people to voluntarily disarm themselves by passing laws against firearms. Using DRUGS and hypnosis on mental patients in a process called ORION, the CIA inculcated the desire in these people to open fire on schoolyards and thus inflame the antigun lobby. This plan is well underway, and so far is working perfectly. The middle class is begging the government to do away with the 2nd amendment”.
He goes on to say that in most cases, PROZAC was involved as was brain implants, or microwave, or E.L.F. intrusion, with most cases ending in suicide of the perpetrator.
Russ Dizdar author of THE BLACK AWAKENING calls these types of killers “sleeper assassins” who through use of trauma are mind-controlled or rather mind-fragmented and through occult rituals and hypnotic trances can be manipulated into mass murderous acts upon command. Steve Quayle of Omega man radio also is very knowledgeable with regard to the unseen forces controlling our world.
Nothing is ever as it first appears.
[Note: You can scroll down a bit in the comment section at the IntelHub link to read a PDF of Cooper's writings, and a bit further down, someone posted a video of his lecture.]
When dealing with enemies and individuals who could not be trusted to tell the truth, President Ronald Reagan famously quipped, "Trust, but verify." These days, with this BADministration and their cohorts in the media of mass deception, we need to question everything! They cannot and should not be trusted! We need to think for ourselves! There is so much LYING, DECEIT, FALSE FLAG OPERATIONS, CORRUPTION, AND COVER-UPS happening at break-neck speed that it truly should boggle the minds of anyone who is REALLY paying attention!
Each time that I have written about the Sandy Hook school massacre tragedy, I had hoped that it would be my LAST POST about it. I'm sickened and devastated enough already! I don't need to see more. But with SO MANY unanswered questions and bloggers discovering many, many strange happenings related to the tragedy, I can't help but report them here.
This video at The Daily Sheeple is truly creepy and made me shudder to think that "hints" about the two tragedies in both Colorado and Connecticut were set-ups. You might ask, "set-ups for what?" Answer: gun control!!! Have you noticed that this is all that the news shows, Congress, BHO, and even Hollywood is talking about?
The more that I investigate and find out about these terrible incidences, the more scary it is to realize how much we are being LIED to and how much corruption and how many cover-ups are going on right under our noses!
Well, perhaps I have spoken enough about all of this. The video at The Daily Sheeple and links below will speak for themselves. Talk Wisdom Reports - You Decide.
~ Christine
*******
Before It Is News picked up on the United Way donation page being created three days before the shooting.
Read other Articles related to the Sandy Hook shooting:
Ed Thomas is a co-editor and contributor for The Daily Sheeple, an alternative media hub for leading headlines, head lies, opinion, and commentary. Wake the flock up!
This content may be freely reproduced in full or in part in digital form with full attribution to the author and a link to www.TheDailySheeple.com.
I did not see the interviews of parents directly on TV after the tragedy, but here is a You tube video of someone's opinion about them: Sandy Hook families interviews.
Hat Tips to all links.
*******
P.S. In case anyone missed this in the comment section of my last post:
It sickens me, scares me, and reviles me to think that anything this horrible could possibly be done by either our government, it's secretive "handlers" or whomever the perpetrators are.
I had a good "gun control" debate with a very good friend of mine last night during dinner. She is a grandmother of 4 children. She seems "all for" more gun control until I explained to her what that would really mean about our liberty, freedoms, and security AGAINST any tyrannical government (like the one we have now!) to have our Second Amendment rights infringed upon.
I shared with her how both the Colorado theater massacre and Sandy Hook elementary massacre were both "gun free" zones - and why lives COULD have been saved if a guard at the theater had a gun to shoot the murderer, or if the school principal had a gun locked in a safe in her office; and upon hearing the shooting happening could have retrieved the gun and killed the shooter dead before more children were killed.
I told her about my last post - regarding just why there is so much media coverage about gun control, yet no questions being asked about mental health issues and psychotropic/psychiatric drugs and their side effects. It was then that "the light bulb" apparently went off in her mind. As a former nurse, she KNOWS of the dangers of such drugs; as well as the dangers of individuals who "go off" their medications and end up doing horrible things.
I don't know all of the answers here. I am just trying to get people to THINK and then decide for themselves what is real and the truth, vs. what is propaganda and evil motives.
I want people who visit here to know that I'm not interested in spreading falsehoods. The Bible is very clear about lying - and that God's judgment against lying is very harsh! Just read about the self-deception of Saul in 1 Samuel 15:1-35. Lying destroys integrity. Dishonest people soon begin to believe the lies they construct around themselves. Then they lose the ability to tell the difference between truth and lies. By believing your own lies you deceive yourself, you alienate yourself from God, and you lose credibility in all your relationships. In the long run, honesty wins out.
Recently, while sharing a disagreement with my best friend (we have known each other for over 20 years!) that I had with another person (and being told by that person that I was lying), she said to me, "Chris, you don't lie like that." It felt so good to hear someone tell me that she believes in my integrity! However, there are people who probably visit here, read what I write about BHO and his BADministration and think I'm a liar, crazy, or both!
When I am caught in something that turns out to be untrue, I always try to amend it. For example, during the election, there was a blog that reported that thousands of military ballots were destroyed rather than counted. GMPilot - (Talk Wisdom's usual nemesis) pointed out to me later that the blog was satire. I went back and made the correction.
(con't)
January 8, 2013 11:08:00 AM PST
The main reason why I write, "Talk Wisdom Reports - You Decide" on certain posts is because of media lies, deceitfulness, and the evil and corruption of many in government. In simple terms, it is often very difficult these days to discern truth from error.
You see, I don't WANT to outwardly and purposefully lie because God's Word instructs us:
"So put away all falsehood and "tell your neighbor the truth" because we belong to each other." (Ephesians 4:25)
Of course, I make mistakes and have made many bad ones over the course of my life, but when I was born again in Christ my new life in Him changed me. I know that lying undermines freedom and undermines the unity of believers in Christ. It creates conflict and destroys trust. It tears down relationships and leads to open warfare. We should put away such "lying ways" once we accept Christ's gift of salvation.
I know that I must consciously renew such a commitment every day. I must have a new role, head in a better direction and have a new way of thinking that the Holy Spirit gives me.
When I see lying going on in others - especially in government - it really hurts. Such lying often leads to injustice; and those who may think they can trust and benefit from government aren't always protected from evil consequences.
I have seen obedience to God provoke anger and hatred from others. It's running rampant these days! But Matthew 10:28 informs us that it is better to suffer from human displeasure than from God's wrath.
I see ridicule against me for being honest as being a possible sign that I am indeed doing what's right in God's eyes (see Matthew 5:10-12; Romans 8:17, 35-39). I certainly hope so. I want Him to use me - not the other way around.
My guide is not to go against Scripture, Jesus' words, or the guidance of the Holy Spirit. When I make errors and mistakes (as we all do because we are all human), I admit it, confess, repent, and strive to not do it again in the future.
Last night, Conservative radio talk show host Roger Hedgecock mentioned that when the colonists desired to break away from the king of England, only a small portion supported it - at first. Those colonist leaders KNEW that something better could be created here in America; as long as they were willing to fight for such freedoms and do so under God's Divine Providence.
Today, we don't see or hear much about that anymore. We have a "law" professor who thinks it's a better idea to scrap the genius of the Constitution because it was written by "men with old fashioned and different thinking over 225 years ago." Because this individual is reprobate, he doesn't see the genius of these men who were far better thinkers at that time than he is now!
Oops...sorry...I'm getting off topic.
One last thought. Our nation is in such peril that it will take only an act of God to keep our Republic alive, well, and intact. I continue to pray each day for His abiding mercy, grace, and love to continue to bless this nation - even when our atrocious sinfulness doesn't deserve it.
Through several blogs on my sidebar, I arrived at a post where there is a radio interview of a part time police lieutenant who has revealed many glaring inconsistencies in the "official" story surrounding the horrendous Sandy Hook massacre.
It is 9:35 a.m., and I am listening to the first You Tube video of the radio interview. There are two parts at Alt Market.com to the interview. I arrived at that blog via:
The following is an excellent interview of a part-time police lieutenant conducted by The SGT Report. Given all the inconsistencies surrounding the theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado, it behooves us to examine ANY mass shooting event with a carefully placed microscope and a skeptical eye.
The events of Sandy Hook are still fresh and chaotic, and not all the facts are in, but we have yet to see the inconsistencies of the initial reports on the scene addressed, and, we still have not seen a single piece of surveillance footage to clear the abnormalities in the official story.
Columbine’s video footage was used by the establishment almost immediately after the attacks, yet, nothing from Newtown?
As the interviewer in the following video states, we are not saying that the events at Sandy Hook are conclusively a false flag, however, the possibility should not be dismissed out of hand.
If we are to go through a national battle over the 2nd Amendment rights of millions of people over Sandy Hook, we should at least have the right information before hand.
Is this "wild conspiracy theory"? No. It is not "conspiratorial" to investigate the mainstream narrative of any event. We are merely asking questions - questions which should be easy to answer if the official story is completely true.
Decided to post the videos here:
In addition to what is discussed in the two radio broadcast videos, one commentator at Alt Market.com also discusses the possible connections of the Libor scandal and the fathers of both shooters in the Colorado theater massacre and the Sandy Hook school massacre (fathers who were to testify in the Libor scandal).
LIBOR SCANDAL and my theory with the provided facts and unanswered questions of both Aurora and Sandy Hook written by LibertariansRus , January 07, 2013
This is an amazing view of the events. The government and media use these incidents to their advantage there is no doubt. I know that the fathers of both the Connecticut shooting and Aurora shooting, Peter Lanza and Robert Holmes were set to testify in the ongoing investigation of the LIBOR Scandal against 13 or 14 MAJOR INTERNATIONAL BANKS who are involved in this scandal. If you look into this both fathers experienced a tragedy and now they will not testify because of the tragedy. I believe that the supposed second shooter of both shootings was an assassin of sorts sent by these greedy money hungry men to scare Peter and Robert into not testifying. The shooter was not this awkwardly unsocial Adam. I do not believe for a second that Adam would kill his own mother. I do believe that this second shooter was caught and immediately released and he was indeed the master planner. He shot Adam's mother and then kidnapped Lanza, forcefully strapped him up in gear and took him to the nearby school to enact this false flag and then the major banks get what they want - The eye witnessed to the LIBOR scandal shut up and second- our tyrannical government gets what it wants -Gun Control.
This is of course just a theory no one knows the exact events not even I. But it is something worth looking into, I really wish they would have talked about this in the video. These are indeed facts that the two fathers are connected. Just as the government knew about 9/11 I believe that they knew of this plan. There are many inconsistencies to support this. ex) The media reported Lanza's mother to be dead inside the school 2hrs before the police actually found her body in the house. No body? and yet they report her dead. huh OKAY so the media obviously was given information of her death but the reported wrong information of scene of crime. they jumped the gun.
*******
Quote from officer:
"You should not put anything past your government."
While going through a comment section at one link, I found this:
You Tube video
VERY creepy!!!! And should get us to REALLY question the "official" story!
In a previous post here at Talk Wisdom, a report from WND's forensic profiler, Dr. Hodges, revealed how BHO has been subconsciously revealing various confessions regarding his ineligibility to be POTUS, his lies, corruption, cover-ups and even now, how the election on November 6, 2012 was illegally stolen.
In a new analysis for WND, Hodges explains that Obama not only confesses, but he suggests a solution for Americans.
“Obama’s deeper moral compass continues to provide guidance to America on how to combat his assaults. In his U.N. speech he repeatedly referred to courageous protesters. ‘They should give us hope… remind us that so long as we work for it justice will be done; that history is on our side; and that a rising tide of liberty will never be reversed.’ Repeatedly, he tells us ‘protest,’ ‘march for justice’ and we can become a rising tide. Citizens still have the power,” Hodges said.
That there are questions about the 2012 election has been reported numerous times by WND.
In Hodges’ assessment: “Following Obama’s presidential reelection impressive findings have emerged pointing to a fraudulent election. A brief summary reveals precincts in Ohio and Pennsylvania reported greater than 100 percent of registered voters turned out to vote. In 100 precincts in Ohio Obama got 99 percent of the votes. Pennsylvania illegally removed GOP poll inspectors from voting locations. Computer irregularities in Pennsylvania (and elsewhere) reverted to a default Obama vote no matter who the voter selected.”
He continued, “Florida prevented absentee ballots from being observed by neutral observers. Military ballots were systematically denied active-duty servicemen and women around the world.”
So he said all he had to do was sit back and wait for the confession.
“One thing is for certain – if Obama stole this election he would confess unconsciously.
We now review that possibility from his own mind, listening for his all-seeing unconscious super intelligence to once more tell us how he truly sees himself deep down. As I described in my book, ‘The Obama Confession: Secret Fear, Secret Fury,’ Obama has repeatedly confessed to his misdeeds of his illegal presidency and sweeping attack on America for four years.”
He explains his observations:
“On election night after initial voting reports declared him the winner, Obama once more unconsciously pointed to a confession. Before his anxious and relieved supporters, Obama spoke of his pride in his daughters but commented, ‘But I will say this for now, one dog’s probably enough’ – on the surface referring back to promising his daughters a puppy after his 2008 victory,” Hodges said.
“But stay with his spontaneous right-brain image. Understand he could have chosen any matter on which to comment and any description but his brilliant unconscious mind which always speaks in a symbolic right-brain language – and carefully chooses its images – selected ‘one dog is enough.’
“Read his confession that America has just elected a dog of a president – and once was enough,” Hodges said.
“He suggests that he’s dogging it as president, faking it as an illegal president in a second way now with a stolen election. That he’s a real ‘dog’ for such deception. The image of a dog further suggests: a pet favored by the media and blind supporters who would not dare to explore his illegality by birth or unfair election; that he will dog or haunt America for another four years because a dog also bites especially a wounded one. (And Obama is deeply wounded beyond belief.) Once again Obama unconsciously points to his deceptive anger and indeed he has bitten/assaulted America in multiple ways, both covert and overt, and plans on more of the same.”
It was interesting, Hodges noted, that Time magazine also then referred to the “dog” image, using it extensively to declare, “It was a fitting end to a one-dog’s-enough sort of campaign.”
“The magazine writer suggests that he had picked up deep down on Obama’s unconscious confession,” Hodges said.
Further, during a Nov. 9 press conference, “Obama snapped at two senators who had criticized U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice for her erroneous declarations regarding the Benghazi attack. He challenged the senators to ‘come after me,’ not Rice,” Hodges said.
“This matches his hidden instructions in the U.N. speech that American citizens be prepared to protest unfair elections. In both his 2008 Fathers’ Day speech as a candidate and in his inaugural address he unconsciously instructed citizens to confront him as an illegal foreign-born candidate/ president,” Hodges said.
“Obama’s ideas continually reflect a preoccupation with unconscious guilt and a need to be caught and stopped. His behavior and decision-making around the Benghazi tragedy with obvious cover-up suggest more guilt – a need to be questioned, a secret confession of being a weak leader and a president who puts a U.S. ambassador’s life at risk,” said Hodges.
He said the newest messages shine new light on Obama’s July 13, 2012, statement that, “If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.”
“The symbolic unconscious message (with a deeper context of a potential vote scam) is not difficult to discern: ‘If I stay in business as president, it won’t be because of me. I’m not really the one who will bring about my reelection – others are going to make sure it happens,’” Hodges said. “His headline-grabbing comment has all the earmarks that he was warning America – attempting to shock everyone into grasping – that a secret plan was taking shape to guarantee his reelection.”
Hodges also cited Obama’s Sept. 25 address to the U.N., saying Obama was “confessing to his illegal presidency and an unfair election in 2008. In retrospect – now that evidence points to the real possibility of a fraudulent election – Obama suggests his brilliant always truthful super-intel was also looking ahead and confessing that plans were underway to steal the election.”
On Hodges’ website, Steven A. Egger, associate professor of criminology at the University of Houston, Clear Lake, has written that Hodges’ technique is “becoming the cutting edge of forensic science.”
“FBI ASKED TO PROBE OBAMA ‘VOTE-CHANGING’ MACHINES”
“A state lawmaker in Maryland has asked the FBI to impound two voting machines used in the 2012 election to determine whether there was a malfunction or something nefarious going on.
“I just feel it is my duty to try to get to the bottom of this,” state Delegate Kathryn Afzali told WND today.“We’re not making any accusations. The Board of Elections are good people. They have checks and balances … but we want to make sure everything is fair.”
She said a number of people contacted her after the Nov. 6 election to report that they pressed a touch-screen button for GOP candidate Mitt Romney, but the vote registered for Barack Obama.
Also, suspiciously, a number of precincts reported a 100-percent vote for Obama, and some even reported beyond 100 percent.
“My request [to the FBI] is … I want them to take these machines. Let an FBI computer expert analyze them,” she said.
She said that among those who contacted her with concerns were two officials, including a state lawmaker who personally experienced a vote machine changing his vote three times to the party whose agenda he opposed.
The lawmaker told her that his computer background left him confident that the problem was beyond a technical glitch, and he insisted that the election judge take the machine out of service and lock it up.
“We need to freeze them in their current state, not wipe out data,” he said.
He said his constituent reported the same scenario as has been reported: hitting the touch-screen button for Romney but finding that that it registered for Obama.
Rothschild said it’s a major problem that has to be addressed in order for Americans to continue trusting their election system.
He said the constituent noticed the vote changes on the summary screen.
“It showed Obama as being selected,” Rothschild told WND, even though his constituent reported voting for the GOP ticket.
“After talking with a few other people, this concern seems to be increasing,” Rothschild told WND. “There are just two possible answers. Either he made a mistake, or something caused that machine to switch the vote.”
He said given that his constituent has experience with computers, the contention that he didn’t know how to use the machine seems a stretch.
“I know how easy it would be to introduce a single spurious line of code,” Rothschild told WND, noting a programmer could easily instruct the machine to change the vote periodically, so a routine test wouldn’t reveal any problems.
He said he was told the county had no jurisdiction over the issue and that it would be up to the state, which is why he discussed the concerns with Afzali.
“It’s very scary,” Rothschild told WND. “It creates a sense of helplessness and hopelessness.”
That, in turn, he said, results in people feeling desperate about their failure to impact government.
“If American people feel they cannot trust their voting system, there’s the possibility of more desperate action,” he said. “There are a number of possibilities [for reaction] in nullifications, secession, including throwing off such governments.
“If people think their voting processes do not work, [if] they conclude they are not being afforded constitutional protections, they may conclude their only option is to throw off such government,” he said.
He said the forensics of voting machine examination would be very important, but a good investigatory review could provide a lot of answers.
“We have all seen little pieces of the problem,” he said.
But to determine what is a problem, he said some sort of overview perspective would be needed.
Not only do authorities need to do a review, future elections need to be done so that every voter is given a printed copy of his or her own vote. The copies could be compiled by clerks to provide a point of reference if questions arise, he said.
Afzali told WND that because she’s on the state elections committee, a number of people came directly to her with their complaints.
Is it ever appropriate to expect (or allow) a pastor to share his opinion about who to vote for?
Received an email from a church pastor today. Apparently, a guest speaker at this particular church must have said some things that the pastor (who was out of town yesterday) thought "crossed the line" regarding discussion of the upcoming election. The letter indicates that the guest speaker must have shared who he/she thinks Christians should vote for. [I don't know which candidate he/she sided with.] In full disclosure, I was out of town, too. I did not hear the sermon, do not know who the "guest speaker" was, nor was I able to access the video version of the sermon online.
The following is an email that I received today. I wanted to put it out there (especially for my fellow Christian readers who frequent Talk Wisdom) and ask what your thoughts are about the content of the email. I will hold my opinions about it until a few days have passed - giving readers a chance to express their own opinions about it.
Copy of email (with name of church and pastor redacted):
I am writing in response to comments made by our
guest speaker at the morning services yesterday. Even though the intent of the
interview was to focus on the general concept of voting according to a biblical
worldview, the speaker's comments strayed further from that message than I would
have liked so I wanted to clarify where we stand as a church on issues related
to the election.
As Christians, God's Word should guide and direct
every area of our lives, even our voting decisions. Proverbs 3:5-6
Because God created the concept of government as a
tool to fulfill His will, Romans 13:1, our political views and voting
decisions should not be separated from our biblical beliefs. Just as
non-believers vote according to their belief system, so believers should vote
according to their belief system.
How that pertains to this particular election is
up to you. The [ ] Church has no intent to endorse or campaign for one party or
candidate. We do not at all believe that one party or candidate has a corner
market on the bible or God.
I am fully aware that there are strong opposing
political opinions in our church and I respect those differences. Since I was
out of town for this Sunday's services, I was not immediately aware of the
content. When I became aware, we made the necessary adjustments to the
presentation.
I want to encourage you to pray and trust that the
Lord will lead you in your voting decisions. We are committed to praying for and
partnering with whoever is elected our next President.
If you have any comments that you would like to
make, or thoughts on how we can do things better, please contact Pastor [....].
There is so much to report...where do I begin? Let's begin with the revelation that the so-called "town hall" debate was a set-up AGAINST Republican Presidential Candidate, Mitt Romney. Now, readers may think 'that can't be true!' Even my own husband didn't believe me at first. But the proof is in the video!
To give credit where credit is due, I learned this information via the following comment at White House Insider:
Proof Obama had questions in advance and was schooled to the questions …very disturbing proof of cheating http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/10/17/cnn-and-the-obama-administration-weapons-of-misdirection/
2nd video 1:06 :35
Obama knew who Kerry, the questioner was, where his seat was, walks to him before he is supposed to know who the questioner even is…. starts to say Kerry’s name before he is supposed to know…realizes what he has done…proving Obama had questions in advance and Crowley was in on it!
At 1:05:25….directs Candy to move on
Kerry may or may not know..I’d like to see Kerry watch that clip and comment
Obama without a TelePrompTer had to cheat
Go to the The Last Refuge Blog link, scroll down, fast forward the debate video to 1:06:35, (turn up the volume to here Obama say "Hi Kerry" even before the man stands up to identify himself) and then watch Obama's head jerk and awkwardly ask the question, "what is your name?" I watched it several times and it was blatantly obvious that Obama already knew who this "Kerry" was, and therefore was also probably prepped for the question. Recall, also, that this is where Candy Crowley interrupted Governor Romney regarding the "Rose Garden" comment that Obama spoke two days after the Benghazi attack. She INCORRECTLY agreed with Obama that he had said it was a "terror attack." Anyone who is not stupid and has been paying attention to the lies being spewed by the LIARadministration, already knows how hard they all tried to play the "anti-Muslim video" card in order to distract the public from finding out the REAL TRUTH ABOUT THIS ATTACK THAT KILLED AMBASSADOR STEVENS, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, and Tyrone Woods.
America watched in disbelief as Barack Obama tried to tell the American people that the attack on the Libyan consulate on September 11 was the result of an amateurish, anti-Muslim video that had been on YouTube for three months with barely three hundred views.
Then suddenly the administration announced that it was, yes, a terrorist attack, but that it was the intelligence community that had fed him bad information ,even though we knew our intelligence community had known it was an al-Qaeda-linked attack within twenty four hours.
Why the equivocation? Why the lies?
None of it made sense.
Until now.
Now Obama’s throwing long-time ally Egypt’s president Hosni Mubarak under the bus for the Muslim Brotherhood makes sense. All the White House contacts with Muslim Brotherhood front groups like CAIR and ISNA [makes more sense]. All the changes that CAIR and ISNA made to the training manuals that our intelligence community uses [makes more sense].
Kevin Dujan, a political analyst and radio and TV host wrote an article and appeared on [a] radio [broadcast] on October 8; putting forth a theory that the attack of the Libyan consulate was tied neither to a video or terrorism, but a botched kidnapping of Ambassador Stevens.
[The plan was] that Barack Obama had arranged with the Muslim Brotherhood to kidnap the Ambassador, and through Obama’s supposed affinity with the Muslim world, Obama would save the day and get the ambassador released.
But the Muslim Brotherhood wanted something in return.
Their beloved Blind Sheik.
Unbelievable?
Western Journalism broke the news on Monday that a source connected to the White House has stated that the murder of Stevens and the other Americans was a botched kidnapping linked to one Barack Hussein Obama.
So, how many of the invaders were killed as they were storming into our consulate? Any? The two Ex-Navy Seals and ex-Air Force Spec-Ops guys that died with our Ambassador ‘we are now told’, were NOT part of the Ambassador’s security team inside that consulate. What about the U.S. Marines assigned to protect the consulate and the Ambassador, where were they? Two of the world’s most elite trained bad asses were there! Those Seals were killed and they didn’t take anyone with them? Two ex-Seals didn’t kill anyone? Wouldn’t they AND every U.S. Military soldier have fought like tigers, to the death; – unless they had been ordered not to?
And yet, NONE of the invaders died? What is WRONG with this picture, folks? Were those Seals and Marines not armed? If so, who gave that disarm order? Who told them NOT to have defensive weapons at the ready? Who ordered them NOT to fire on the invaders?
The United States has always had a second and sometimes – third-line of defense inside any embassy or consulate. The bodies of those invaders should have been stacked up like cord wood unless our Seals and Marines were un-armed! The Marines and Seals would have had preplanned, defendable, defensive positions stocked with ammo and weapons unless they were ordered not to do so.
So, staged or not, some interesting questions to ask of those in charge.
Nice Deb has a story about an "Obama campaign October surprise" against Governor Romney! These people are absolutely RUTHLESS AND CRIMINAL - YET THEY THINK THAT A ROMNEY TAX RETURN FROM THE PAST WOULD TRUMP THE TREASON WE HAVE JUST FOUND OUT????
I’m not going to link to the countdown website because as many have already noted – it has a definite hactivist feel to it. William Jacobson reported on this story, earlier today: The tweets for the website (private to protect their sources) say the campaign knows about it and is scared. “It has the potential [...]
Free Republic started a discussion about the Benghazi terrorist attack back on October 14th:
. Two SEALs ruin October Surprise Author ^ | 10/14/2012 | Kozy
Posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 8:28:48 AM by Kozy
The murder of Ambassador Stevens at Benghazi is Obama's October surprise gone bad thanks to two former SEALS who were not supposed to be at Benghazi. But then I ran to the end of the story so let's back fill the datapoints.
First, President Morsi first public statement to us was that he wanted the blind iman who first bombed the WTC released. Now Obama forever dedicated to appeasing the muslim world, bowing to them comes natural to him, knew that he had to obey Morsi's request however he couldn't release Omar Abdul-Rahman. There had to be a reason powerful enough to warrant his release. What better than to return to the Carter era of American hostages?
Obama sees a way to release the iman and secure his reelection in one act. So the wheels are set in motion. So he needed a cover story. Oh, the You Tube video that no one has seen, released in July. America could be shamed into releasing the iman because someone posted an obscure video and we have to follow Obama's lead and bow to muslims.
Next weaken the security at Benghazi by removing the security teams and employing Libyan bodyguards for the ambassador. In effect the embassy could not defend itself. The back channel had to be from the WH to the iman's legal representatives. It was suggested that Obama needed a reason to release the iman that America could agree to. What better than hostages? They were informed that there were no security forces at Benghazi to defend Stevens so over run the embassy and take him hostage. Really easy.
What was not planned for were former SEALS Donerty and Woods. They were not part of Stevens security detail; they happened to be in Benghazi working for the CIA to located missing surface-to-air missiles.
So the terrorists plan the assault on the embassy thinking there would be no resistance. Well two SEALS never back down from defending America and Americans. These two heros gave their lives fighting to protect our embassy and our ambassador. No telling how many peaceful muslim they transported to the after life however the terrorists who thought this was just a walk in the park protect now sought out the Americans to kill them not hold them captive. The over throw went from hostage taking to killing.
Now the WH knew the plan had blown up. There were no hostages only dead Americans. How to cover? Roll out the 14 minute video, no one has seen, as the cause. The WH cover up was in play.
With the killing of Ambassador Stevens, there could be no exchange, no October surprise. Oh what was the October surprise? Well Obama would spend a month negotiating with the terrorists for the release of Ambassador Stevens and finally and after his focused efforts on saving Stevens' life, Stevens would be released just before the election. Obama would have sucked out all the energy from the campaign as everyone would be watching him, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, negotiate for the release of Stevens. The world would applaud him, the muslim would have their murderous iman back, he would be reelected and the destruction of America who go on.
We can only thank every day these SEALS for defending America with their lives.
A lot of datapoints, Benghazi, President Morsi, SEALS, blind iman, 14 minute You Tube video; withdrawal of security from embassy, October surprise and Obama's October surprise.
Wonder which story makes more sense? Mine or the one the WH spins every day that keeps changing as the lies are exposed.
The following are comments that add to this theory:
To: Kozy
What was not planned for were former SEALS Doherty and Woods. They were not part of Stevens security detail; they happened to be in Benghazi working for the CIA to located missing surface-to-air missiles. You see the Congressional testimony? When asked how many surface to air (I thought shoulder-mounted) missles, the State Dept guy said something like, "10,000 to 20,000". Eerie. No one picked that one up.
23posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 9:05:18 AMby Zuben Elgenubi
*******
To: Kozy
Good scenerio. I wonder what our Ambassador and important security documents were doing in Bengahzi with little security at less than standard accomodations in an area that everyone else (UN, Brits) were bugging out. Another scenerio: An AQ attack on a CIA operation with the Ambassador as collateral damage? (The Libs despise the CIA)
24posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 9:07:55 AMby griswold3(Big Government does not tolerate rivals.)
*******
To: Kozy
This scenario is very believable for many reasons. Just two that come to mind are:
1) that leftists would manipulate, connive, lie and distort for the purpose of political gain
2) that the only thing these leftists are ultimately capable of, when they try to manipulate circumstances involving elements of military intelligence, is to completely screw up their own plan
It’s as if they had Valerie Jarrett running things.
25posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 9:09:57 AMby reasonisfaith("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
*******
To: Terry Mross
As has been commented, I am not a writer. Hope someone else with a better pen than I will expand and explore. The two SEALS who gave their lives and threw the monkey wrench into the story are the heroes. Read about them in the following account. It was got me thinking and as the stories have unfolded, I believe I am right with the true story.http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/09/21/boldly-into-the-breach/
28posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 9:17:45 AMby Kozy(Calling Al Gore)
[Note from Christine: GO READ THAT LINK!!!!]
*******
To: bert
To complex and fragile to be real How so? It fits every verifiable detail as to timing and placement of personnel. Stevens stayed later than everyone else (who left in August, I believe). The video was an excuse. It had been released months earlier, and even the Libyans said there was no protest...that is was a terrorist act. The security personnel were removed and indigenous personnel comprised the security team. There WAS media babble about releasing the 'blind sheik' What exactly DOESN'T fit? ----- IMHO, the principle of Occam's razor applies. That among competing hypotheses, the one which makes the fewest assumptions should be selected. I can find no 'assumptions' in the author's theory, and the one assumption previously posed by another FReeper fits the facts as well. It would explain WHY Obama wasn't concerned about the 3am phone call and why NOTHING was done while our people were being murdered. One has to wonder what those people who ignored those cries for help are thinking now.
30posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 9:21:27 AMby MamaTexan(I am a Person as Created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
*******
To: Kozy
Were the two Seals in the room with Stephens and Smith when the “guard” was taking the pictures? The pictures were being sent to someone and they would have been noticed. Or maybe they were being sent for ID reasons but it was something Smith wrote about on Eve online to his friend. He was so perturbed he mentioned they mightn’t get out alive.
33posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 9:25:15 AMby bronxville(Margaret Sanger - “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,Â)
God's Word Stands Forever! [Click on Bible photo to reach Blue Letter Bible v3.]
Proverbs 2:2-5
"Make your ear attentive to wisdom, incline your heart to understanding; for if you cry for discernment, lift your voice for understanding; if you seek her as silver, and search for her as for hidden treasures; then you will discern the fear of the LORD, and discover the knowledge of God"
Lies Obama Has Told America
Pinterest.com: Lies Obama Has Told Us
Well! You did it, America - This is your guy. Somehow, Obama was able to spend 4 years attacking your Freedom and lying about it the whole time. And yet, you re-elected him. This board is dedicated to setting straight the many, many, many lies he and the media pass off as truth. Re-pin these and help spread the word!
Talk Wisdom blog was a finalist in "The Best Religious Blog" category in 2007.
Our Judeo-Christian Nation
Enjoy watching Representative Randy Forbes soundly rebut Obama's claim that "we do not consider ourselves a Judeo-Christian nation!"
The Manhattan Declaration: A Call of Christian Conscience
Christians, when they have lived up to the highest ideals of their faith, have defended the weak and vulnerable and worked tirelessly to protect and strengthen vital institutions of civil society, beginning with the family.
We are Orthodox, Catholic, and evangelical Christians who have united at this hour to reaffirm fundamental truths about justice and the common good, and to call upon our fellow citizens, believers and non-believers alike, to join us in defending them. These truths are:
1. the sanctity of human life 2. the dignity of marriage as the conjugal union of husband and wife 3. the rights of conscience and religious liberty.
Inasmuch as these truths are foundational to human dignity and the well-being of society, they are inviolable and non-negotiable. Because they are increasingly under assault from powerful forces in our culture, we are compelled today to speak out forcefully in their defense, and to commit ourselves to honoring them fully no matter what pressures are brought upon us and our institutions to abandon or compromise them. We make this commitment not as partisans of any political group but as followers of Jesus Christ, the crucified and risen Lord, who is the Way, the Truth, and the Life.
“Are you willing to spend time studying the issues, making yourself aware, and then conveying that information to family and friends? Will you resist the temptation to get a government handout for your community? Realize that the doctor’s fight against socialized medicine is your fight. We can’t socialize the doctors without socializing the patients.
Recognize that government invasion of public power is eventually an assault upon your own business. If some among you fear taking a stand because you are afraid of reprisals from customers, clients, or even government, recognize that you are just feeding the crocodile hoping he’ll eat you last.” - Ronald Reagan
C. H. Spurgeon Quote
It is in the way of truth that real peace is found. If we quit the faith or leave the path of righteousness under the notion of promoting peace, we shall be greatly mistaken.
‘When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…’ “
Read that last line again.
“That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…”
That’s an admission that Great Britain “governed the status” of Barack Obama, Jr. He has chosen to highlight this on his own volition.
And this leads to the relevant question:
HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN’S STATUS BE “GOVERNED” BY GREAT BRITAIN?
A natural born citizen’s status should only be governed by the United States.
Hat Tip: Natural Born Citizen blog
Our Trust is in God
"No matter what happens though, my trust is in God, He will provide, and while there may be much to fear in this world, there is nothing to fear in eternity." - Matt Wiser
A Quotable Quote
Only the lifting of the soul by the Spirit of God can overcome the downward pulling of the earth and darkness. - Stevex09
North Korea and the E.U. on Human Rights
-
In the Sermon on the Mount in the New Testament, Jesus uses the metaphor of
a mere sliver of wood in another person’s eye being objected to by a person
w...
Trump’s Useless “Veto” of a Socialist America
-
By: Cliff Kincaid In the wake of major Democratic Party gains, at least
according to the media, President Trump seems to think a veto will...
Waking With Dread
-
[image: About_last_night_poster]
So, the crazies won. My soul aches mightily. Although I have contemplated
the possibility of this outcome I didn’t allow...
-
* Over 3 Million Students Are Homeschooled*
Brian D. Ray, president of the National Home Education Research Institute
(NHERI) — a non-profit group that c...
Unjust …
-
This is brilliant. Watch the video linked by James Woods at his X account:
They want you in chains. Not visible, but in chains. Electric cars, that
can be ...
An Epidemic Of Biden
-
America's real public health epidemic is the continuing election of
Democrats to public office by fair means or foul--usually the latter.
After all, the D...
Building The Blame Game Or How To Create An Excuse
-
The following is another missive from my friend in Washington, Reeko: There
are copy editors already prepping headlines for November which will read
someth...
Correction and Reproof of Liberal False Teachers
-
*Today, I feel led to share a link to my friend Neil's blog - **Eternity
Matters.** He has written an excellent post that biblically "outs" the
false ...
Good Home Treatment of Influenza
-
All the way back in 2011 I wrote *The Prepared Family Guide to Uncommon
Diseases*. Actually, more than writing, I merely compiled easily obtained
info...
July Board Meeting
-
The next NHLA Board meeting will be Saturday, July 7th at 4pm in the
upstairs conference room at Murphy's Taproom at 494 Elm Street, Manchester,
NH. The ...
Correction and Reproof of Liberal False Teachers
-
*Today, I feel led to share a link to my friend Neil's blog - **Eternity
Matters.** He has written an excellent post that biblically "outs" the
false ...
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security
George Washington Quote
The cause we are engaged in is so just and righteous that we must try to rise superior to every obstacle in its support.
--George Washington 1775
Ronald Reagan quote
"The ultimate determinant in the struggle now going on for the world will not be bombs and rockets but a test of wills and ideas -- a trial of spiritual resolve: the values we hold, the beliefs we cherish, and the ideals to which we are dedicated."
God or Man?
-
On divine sovereignty and human responsibility: Sometimes even television
commercials can contain some much-needed wisdom. That includes the old taco
ad ...
Christians Should Tell the Truth about Halloween
-
I have always believed that whether or not followers of Christ choose to
observe Halloween is a matter of personal conviction. However, I also
believe th...
The Accelerating Pace of Sin in the World!
-
Commentary By: Gordon King Back in the days (October 2012) when I first
started writing this blog it was quite difficult to find articles about
heinous cri...
FAKE REVIVAL
-
*Part 7B of Fake Awaken*
* Read Part 7A: Fake Awaken*
*FAKE PROPHETS article series*
*Read Part 1: The White Lab Coats*
*Read Part 2: The Fishbowl *
*...
They Get Everything Wrong
-
Throughout my adult life, I've been a skeptic. Back in the days before
social science departments fell prey to fill-in-the-blank studies,
professors in t...
There is no high like the Most High
-
May we stop giving in to temporary fleshly desires. Our birthright is to
have all that the Spirit has to give us. We have been given freedom, and
whom the ...
Yes I’m Black and voted for Trump. Here’s why.
-
“Trump is a racist, sexist pig” some would say. CNN’s Van Jones calls this
a “whitelash” when he said: “It was whitelash against a black president in
part...
Who To Write A Essay writecustomessays.com
-
With pen and paper, there is little temptation for distraction for doing
anything more than the task at hand ‘ taking notes on the lecture. We only
employ ...
Fear Of Abstraction?
-
Vancouver 2015
LANGER, SUSANNE K (1953)(1967) *An Introduction to Symbolic Logic*, Dover
Publications, New York.
*Chapter 1: The Study of fo...
Jeffrey Dahmer
-
One of the most fascinating things about Christianity is its doctrine of
grace; a terribly misunderstood doctrine in this day. While perhaps the
majority ...
Correction and Reproof of Liberal False Teachers
-
*Today, I feel led to share a link to my friend Neil's blog - **Eternity
Matters.** He has written an excellent post that biblically "outs" the
false ...
Homosexual "Marriage" Not Acceptable to God
-
*During a wonderful walk on a beautiful day at the beach yesterday, my good
friend and I got in a discussion about "gay" marriage, civil unions, and
tra...
I Never Thought I'd See The Day
-
Tomorrow, October 4, 2011 is the date for release of Dr. David Jeremiah's
new book, *I Never Thought I'd See The Day - Culture at the Crossroads*. I
alread...
Italian Greyhounds
-
I’m leaving this post up because it is one of the top Google searches for
Italian Greyhounds. It was used on a t-shirt sold in a women’s clothing
store an...
Read Dr. Jeremiah's "What In The World Is Going On?"
This book gives us ten prophetic clues that you cannot afford to ignore.
"In this book, I want to help you find the truth about what is going on. I want to show you that while our age is certainly fractionated," it need not be scary - not for Christians who trust the Lord and know how to read the signs and understand coming events. [Y]ou will recognize the clues that God has given us to find peace in "our terrifying age." [B]ut mostly, I hope this book will help to "Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid" (John 14:27)."
The Danger Posed by Delusional Progressives
-
The average person, particularly those with "progressive" mindsets borne of
media brainwashing and disinformation, literally have no idea how horrible
...
The Epiphany and the Electoral College
-
Both the Epiphany and the Electoral College take place on Friday, January
6th. The Electoral College will be before the Senate. The votes from the
states w...
DHS Appoints Islamic Fundamentalists
-
* 18 November 2009:* There is nothing new here, but it bears more exposure.
It is evident that no lessons have been learned by the Fort Hood Islamic
terror...
PhD: Twitter quote 21
-
*PhD: Twitter quote 21*
Photo; Pixabay, Bridge Railway
PhD version
Erlandson explains that many theodicy are fatally flawed since they are too
focused ...
Constitution Week 2026
-
If you are looking for the New Home of Political Pistachio, go to
www.douglasvgibbs.com/political-pistachio
On September 17, 18, and 19 catch Douglas V. ...
Bandar Slot Gacor Hari Ini Dengan Bet Termurah
-
Bandar slot gacor hari ini menyajikan layanan terbaik 24 jam nonstop setiap
hari. Akses melalui computer, tablet serta android selalu aman. Fasilitas
ter...
How Convenient! Part 2: Zayd, Saowda & Rayhana
-
Muhammad's quest to marry Zaynab involved multiple prophecies and touched
many lives. Here we learn about his special relationship with Zayd, his
not-so-...
SENATOR RON JOHNSON; COVID-19: A SECOND OPINION
-
EDITOR’S NOTE: Super tight schedule today; I’m throwing this up and hoping
that Senator Johnson’s office at some point puts up the entire five hour
confere...
Justine’s Eyebrows YIKES!!!
-
People don't get it. Trump is out to drive "Justine" Trudeau out of office,
it has nothing to do with a trade imbalance.
Like during the primary he expose...
Message from Doug Hagmann
-
There should be no doubt that a coup d’état is taking place inside the
United States at this very moment. Plans for it began the moment political
outside...
That Was CNN
-
It was the good, the bad and the ugly. I was invited yesterday, Saturday,
to appear on CNN’s Reliable Sources with Brian Stelter. To his credit he
put me...
Correction and Reproof of Liberal False Teachers
-
*Today, I feel led to share a link to my friend Neil's blog - **Eternity
Matters.** He has written an excellent post that biblically "outs" the
false ...
Proverbs 2:2-5: "Make your ear attentive to wisdom, incline your heart to understanding; for if you cry for discernment, lift your voice for understanding; if you seek her as silver, and search for her as for hidden treasures; then you will discern the fear of the LORD, and discover the knowledge of God" (NASB).
Awesome Site Award
Thanks to Tamela's Place for selecting Talk Wisdom for this award!
Married for 29 years to my wonderful husband! Two grown children whom we treasure. Our family is very close and love to spend time with each other. We all share a deep Christian faith, love for the Lord Jesus Christ and love for each other. I earned a BA in education from Kean University in 1978. I have been studying the Bible for 20 years and in 2003, upon successful completion of the course of study offered in the MA Lecture Series, earned a Christian Apologetics Certificate from Biola University.
Posts
