To give credit where credit is due, I learned this information via the following comment at White House Insider:
Why all the lies?? Why all the cover-up?? Perhaps the following video, which I obtained from Expose Obama.com: Video:Benghazi Attack Was Botched Kidnapping To Trade Blind Sheik !! will tell us the reason:
Here is the text from Expose Obama.com:
America watched in disbelief as Barack Obama tried to tell the American people that the attack on the Libyan consulate on September 11 was the result of an amateurish, anti-Muslim video that had been on YouTube for three months with barely three hundred views.temp111 says:
Then suddenly the administration announced that it was, yes, a terrorist attack, but that it was the intelligence community that had fed him bad information ,even though we knew our intelligence community had known it was an al-Qaeda-linked attack within twenty four hours.
Why the equivocation? Why the lies?
None of it made sense.
Now Obama’s throwing long-time ally Egypt’s president Hosni Mubarak under the bus for the Muslim Brotherhood makes sense. All the White House contacts with Muslim Brotherhood front groups like CAIR and ISNA [makes more sense]. All the changes that CAIR and ISNA made to the training manuals that our intelligence community uses [makes more sense].
Kevin Dujan, a political analyst and radio and TV host wrote an article and appeared on [a] radio [broadcast] on October 8; putting forth a theory that the attack of the Libyan consulate was tied neither to a video or terrorism, but a botched kidnapping of Ambassador Stevens.
[The plan was] that Barack Obama had arranged with the Muslim Brotherhood to kidnap the Ambassador, and through Obama’s supposed affinity with the Muslim world, Obama would save the day and get the ambassador released. But the Muslim Brotherhood wanted something in return.
Their beloved Blind Sheik.
Western Journalism broke the news on Monday that a source connected to the White House has stated that the murder of Stevens and the other Americans was a botched kidnapping linked to one Barack Hussein Obama.
Update: Comment from above link:
- Did Obama Stage Benghazi Attack? I received a phone call from an old friend that…
Hat tips to all links.
- Obama To Transfer Blind Sheik To Egypt? This sure doesn’t look good for Obama. First the Muslim…
But that's not all.
Nice Deb has a story about an "Obama campaign October surprise" against Governor Romney! These people are absolutely RUTHLESS AND CRIMINAL - YET THEY THINK THAT A ROMNEY TAX RETURN FROM THE PAST WOULD TRUMP THE TREASON WE HAVE JUST FOUND OUT????
Who’s Ready For an October Surprise?
Need more proof about Obama's radical Muslim ties and activities?
A Nation Adrift - Why? Is President Obama the Godfather of The Islamic Revolution?
Free Republic started a discussion about the Benghazi terrorist attack back on October 14th:
Two SEALs ruin October Surprise
Author ^ | 10/14/2012 | Kozy
Posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 8:28:48 AM by Kozy
The murder of Ambassador Stevens at Benghazi is Obama's October surprise gone bad thanks to two former SEALS who were not supposed to be at Benghazi. But then I ran to the end of the story so let's back fill the datapoints.
First, President Morsi first public statement to us was that he wanted the blind iman who first bombed the WTC released. Now Obama forever dedicated to appeasing the muslim world, bowing to them comes natural to him, knew that he had to obey Morsi's request however he couldn't release Omar Abdul-Rahman. There had to be a reason powerful enough to warrant his release. What better than to return to the Carter era of American hostages?
Obama sees a way to release the iman and secure his reelection in one act. So the wheels are set in motion. So he needed a cover story. Oh, the You Tube video that no one has seen, released in July. America could be shamed into releasing the iman because someone posted an obscure video and we have to follow Obama's lead and bow to muslims.
Next weaken the security at Benghazi by removing the security teams and employing Libyan bodyguards for the ambassador. In effect the embassy could not defend itself. The back channel had to be from the WH to the iman's legal representatives. It was suggested that Obama needed a reason to release the iman that America could agree to. What better than hostages? They were informed that there were no security forces at Benghazi to defend Stevens so over run the embassy and take him hostage. Really easy.
What was not planned for were former SEALS Donerty and Woods. They were not part of Stevens security detail; they happened to be in Benghazi working for the CIA to located missing surface-to-air missiles.
So the terrorists plan the assault on the embassy thinking there would be no resistance. Well two SEALS never back down from defending America and Americans. These two heros gave their lives fighting to protect our embassy and our ambassador. No telling how many peaceful muslim they transported to the after life however the terrorists who thought this was just a walk in the park protect now sought out the Americans to kill them not hold them captive. The over throw went from hostage taking to killing.
Now the WH knew the plan had blown up. There were no hostages only dead Americans. How to cover? Roll out the 14 minute video, no one has seen, as the cause. The WH cover up was in play.
With the killing of Ambassador Stevens, there could be no exchange, no October surprise. Oh what was the October surprise? Well Obama would spend a month negotiating with the terrorists for the release of Ambassador Stevens and finally and after his focused efforts on saving Stevens' life, Stevens would be released just before the election. Obama would have sucked out all the energy from the campaign as everyone would be watching him, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, negotiate for the release of Stevens. The world would applaud him, the muslim would have their murderous iman back, he would be reelected and the destruction of America who go on.
We can only thank every day these SEALS for defending America with their lives.
A lot of datapoints, Benghazi, President Morsi, SEALS, blind iman, 14 minute You Tube video; withdrawal of security from embassy, October surprise and Obama's October surprise.
Wonder which story makes more sense? Mine or the one the WH spins every day that keeps changing as the lies are exposed.
Read the comments, too: Free Republic: Two SEALs ruin October Surprise
Second Update on 10/19/12:
The following are comments that add to this theory:
Another scenerio: An AQ attack on a CIA operation with the Ambassador as collateral damage? (The Libs despise the CIA)
1) that leftists would manipulate, connive, lie and distort for the purpose of political gain
2) that the only thing these leftists are ultimately capable of, when they try to manipulate circumstances involving elements of military intelligence, is to completely screw up their own plan
It’s as if they had Valerie Jarrett running things.