To give credit where credit is due, I learned this information via the following comment at White House Insider:
AmericaTheBeautiful
Proof Obama had questions in advance and was schooled to the questions …very disturbing proof of cheating
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/10/17/cnn-and-the-obama-administration-weapons-of-misdirection/
2nd video 1:06 :35
Obama knew who Kerry, the questioner was, where his seat was, walks to him before he is supposed to know who the questioner even is…. starts to say Kerry’s name before he is supposed to know…realizes what he has done…proving Obama had questions in advance and Crowley was in on it!
At 1:05:25….directs Candy to move on
Kerry may or may not know..I’d like to see Kerry watch that clip and comment
Obama without a TelePrompTer had to cheat
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/10/17/cnn-and-the-obama-administration-weapons-of-misdirection/
2nd video 1:06 :35
Obama knew who Kerry, the questioner was, where his seat was, walks to him before he is supposed to know who the questioner even is…. starts to say Kerry’s name before he is supposed to know…realizes what he has done…proving Obama had questions in advance and Crowley was in on it!
At 1:05:25….directs Candy to move on
Kerry may or may not know..I’d like to see Kerry watch that clip and comment
Obama without a TelePrompTer had to cheat
Go to the The Last Refuge Blog link, scroll down, fast forward the debate video to 1:06:35, (turn up the volume to here Obama say "Hi Kerry" even before the man stands up to identify himself) and then watch Obama's head jerk and awkwardly ask the question, "what is your name?" I watched it several times and it was blatantly obvious that Obama already knew who this "Kerry" was, and therefore was also probably prepped for the question. Recall, also, that this is where Candy Crowley interrupted Governor Romney regarding the "Rose Garden" comment that Obama spoke two days after the Benghazi attack. She INCORRECTLY agreed with Obama that he had said it was a "terror attack." Anyone who is not stupid and has been paying attention to the lies being spewed by the LIARadministration, already knows how hard they all tried to play the "anti-Muslim video" card in order to distract the public from finding out the REAL TRUTH ABOUT THIS ATTACK THAT KILLED AMBASSADOR STEVENS, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, and Tyrone Woods.
Here is the text from Expose Obama.com:
America watched in disbelief as Barack Obama tried to tell the American people that the attack on the Libyan consulate on September 11 was the result of an amateurish, anti-Muslim video that had been on YouTube for three months with barely three hundred views.temp111 says:
Then suddenly the administration announced that it was, yes, a terrorist attack, but that it was the intelligence community that had fed him bad information ,even though we knew our intelligence community had known it was an al-Qaeda-linked attack within twenty four hours.
Why the equivocation? Why the lies?
None of it made sense.
Until now.
Now Obama’s throwing long-time ally Egypt’s president Hosni Mubarak under the bus for the Muslim Brotherhood makes sense. All the White House contacts with Muslim Brotherhood front groups like CAIR and ISNA [makes more sense]. All the changes that CAIR and ISNA made to the training manuals that our intelligence community uses [makes more sense].
Kevin Dujan, a political analyst and radio and TV host wrote an article and appeared on [a] radio [broadcast] on October 8; putting forth a theory that the attack of the Libyan consulate was tied neither to a video or terrorism, but a botched kidnapping of Ambassador Stevens.
[The plan was] that Barack Obama had arranged with the Muslim Brotherhood to kidnap the Ambassador, and through Obama’s supposed affinity with the Muslim world, Obama would save the day and get the ambassador released. But the Muslim Brotherhood wanted something in return.
Their beloved Blind Sheik.
Unbelievable?
Western Journalism broke the news on Monday that a source connected to the White House has stated that the murder of Stevens and the other Americans was a botched kidnapping linked to one Barack Hussein Obama.
Related posts:
Update: Comment from above link:
- Did Obama Stage Benghazi Attack? I received a phone call from an old friend that…
Staged or not. The whole event raises questions.
So, how many of the invaders were killed as they were storming into our consulate? Any? The two Ex-Navy Seals and ex-Air Force Spec-Ops guys that died with our Ambassador ‘we are now told’, were NOT part of the Ambassador’s security team inside that consulate. What about the U.S. Marines assigned to protect the consulate and the Ambassador, where were they? Two of the world’s most elite trained bad asses were there! Those Seals were killed and they didn’t take anyone with them? Two ex-Seals didn’t kill anyone? Wouldn’t they AND every U.S. Military soldier have fought like tigers, to the death; – unless they had been ordered not to?
And yet, NONE of the invaders died? What is WRONG with this picture, folks? Were those Seals and Marines not armed? If so, who gave that disarm order? Who told them NOT to have defensive weapons at the ready? Who ordered them NOT to fire on the invaders?
The United States has always had a second and sometimes – third-line of defense inside any embassy or consulate. The bodies of those invaders should have been stacked up like cord wood unless our Seals and Marines were un-armed! The Marines and Seals would have had preplanned, defendable, defensive positions stocked with ammo and weapons unless they were ordered not to do so.
So, staged or not, some interesting questions to ask of those in charge.
So, how many of the invaders were killed as they were storming into our consulate? Any? The two Ex-Navy Seals and ex-Air Force Spec-Ops guys that died with our Ambassador ‘we are now told’, were NOT part of the Ambassador’s security team inside that consulate. What about the U.S. Marines assigned to protect the consulate and the Ambassador, where were they? Two of the world’s most elite trained bad asses were there! Those Seals were killed and they didn’t take anyone with them? Two ex-Seals didn’t kill anyone? Wouldn’t they AND every U.S. Military soldier have fought like tigers, to the death; – unless they had been ordered not to?
And yet, NONE of the invaders died? What is WRONG with this picture, folks? Were those Seals and Marines not armed? If so, who gave that disarm order? Who told them NOT to have defensive weapons at the ready? Who ordered them NOT to fire on the invaders?
The United States has always had a second and sometimes – third-line of defense inside any embassy or consulate. The bodies of those invaders should have been stacked up like cord wood unless our Seals and Marines were un-armed! The Marines and Seals would have had preplanned, defendable, defensive positions stocked with ammo and weapons unless they were ordered not to do so.
So, staged or not, some interesting questions to ask of those in charge.
Hat tips to all links.
- Obama To Transfer Blind Sheik To Egypt? This sure doesn’t look good for Obama. First the Muslim…
*******
But that's not all.
Nice Deb has a story about an "Obama campaign October surprise" against Governor Romney! These people are absolutely RUTHLESS AND CRIMINAL - YET THEY THINK THAT A ROMNEY TAX RETURN FROM THE PAST WOULD TRUMP THE TREASON WE HAVE JUST FOUND OUT????
Who’s Ready For an October Surprise?
nicedeb at Nice Deb - 10 hours ago
I’m not going to link to the countdown website because as many have already noted – it has a definite hactivist feel to it. William Jacobson reported on this story, earlier today: The tweets for the website (private to protect their sources) say the campaign knows about it and is scared. “It has the potential [...]
Talk Wisdom Reports...You Decide
*******
Need more proof about Obama's radical Muslim ties and activities?
A Nation Adrift - Why? Is President Obama the Godfather of The Islamic Revolution?
*******
Free Republic started a discussion about the Benghazi terrorist attack back on October 14th:
.
Two SEALs ruin October Surprise
Author ^ | 10/14/2012 | Kozy
Posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 8:28:48 AM by Kozy
The murder of Ambassador Stevens at Benghazi is Obama's October surprise gone bad thanks to two former SEALS who were not supposed to be at Benghazi. But then I ran to the end of the story so let's back fill the datapoints.
First, President Morsi first public statement to us was that he wanted the blind iman who first bombed the WTC released. Now Obama forever dedicated to appeasing the muslim world, bowing to them comes natural to him, knew that he had to obey Morsi's request however he couldn't release Omar Abdul-Rahman. There had to be a reason powerful enough to warrant his release. What better than to return to the Carter era of American hostages?
Obama sees a way to release the iman and secure his reelection in one act. So the wheels are set in motion. So he needed a cover story. Oh, the You Tube video that no one has seen, released in July. America could be shamed into releasing the iman because someone posted an obscure video and we have to follow Obama's lead and bow to muslims.
Next weaken the security at Benghazi by removing the security teams and employing Libyan bodyguards for the ambassador. In effect the embassy could not defend itself. The back channel had to be from the WH to the iman's legal representatives. It was suggested that Obama needed a reason to release the iman that America could agree to. What better than hostages? They were informed that there were no security forces at Benghazi to defend Stevens so over run the embassy and take him hostage. Really easy.
What was not planned for were former SEALS Donerty and Woods. They were not part of Stevens security detail; they happened to be in Benghazi working for the CIA to located missing surface-to-air missiles.
So the terrorists plan the assault on the embassy thinking there would be no resistance. Well two SEALS never back down from defending America and Americans. These two heros gave their lives fighting to protect our embassy and our ambassador. No telling how many peaceful muslim they transported to the after life however the terrorists who thought this was just a walk in the park protect now sought out the Americans to kill them not hold them captive. The over throw went from hostage taking to killing.
Now the WH knew the plan had blown up. There were no hostages only dead Americans. How to cover? Roll out the 14 minute video, no one has seen, as the cause. The WH cover up was in play.
With the killing of Ambassador Stevens, there could be no exchange, no October surprise. Oh what was the October surprise? Well Obama would spend a month negotiating with the terrorists for the release of Ambassador Stevens and finally and after his focused efforts on saving Stevens' life, Stevens would be released just before the election. Obama would have sucked out all the energy from the campaign as everyone would be watching him, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, negotiate for the release of Stevens. The world would applaud him, the muslim would have their murderous iman back, he would be reelected and the destruction of America who go on.
We can only thank every day these SEALS for defending America with their lives.
A lot of datapoints, Benghazi, President Morsi, SEALS, blind iman, 14 minute You Tube video; withdrawal of security from embassy, October surprise and Obama's October surprise.
Wonder which story makes more sense? Mine or the one the WH spins every day that keeps changing as the lies are exposed.
Read the comments, too: Free Republic: Two SEALs ruin October Surprise
*******
Second Update on 10/19/12:
The following are comments that add to this theory:
To: Kozy
What was not planned for were former SEALS Doherty and Woods. They were not part of Stevens security detail; they happened to be in Benghazi working for the CIA to located missing surface-to-air missiles. You see the Congressional testimony? When asked how many surface to air (I thought shoulder-mounted) missles, the State Dept guy said something like, "10,000 to 20,000". Eerie. No one picked that one up.
*******
To: Kozy
Good scenerio. I wonder what our Ambassador and important security documents were doing in Bengahzi with little security at less than standard accomodations in an area that everyone else (UN, Brits) were bugging out.
Another scenerio: An AQ attack on a CIA operation with the Ambassador as collateral damage? (The Libs despise the CIA)
Another scenerio: An AQ attack on a CIA operation with the Ambassador as collateral damage? (The Libs despise the CIA)
24posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 9:07:55 AMby griswold3(Big Government does not tolerate rivals.)
*******
To: Kozy
This scenario is very believable for many reasons. Just two that come to mind are:
1) that leftists would manipulate, connive, lie and distort for the purpose of political gain
2) that the only thing these leftists are ultimately capable of, when they try to manipulate circumstances involving elements of military intelligence, is to completely screw up their own plan
It’s as if they had Valerie Jarrett running things.
1) that leftists would manipulate, connive, lie and distort for the purpose of political gain
2) that the only thing these leftists are ultimately capable of, when they try to manipulate circumstances involving elements of military intelligence, is to completely screw up their own plan
It’s as if they had Valerie Jarrett running things.
25posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 9:09:57 AMby reasonisfaith("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
*******
To: Terry Mross
As has been commented, I am not a writer. Hope someone else with a better pen than I will expand and explore. The two SEALS who gave their lives and threw the monkey wrench into the story are the heroes. Read about them in the following account. It was got me thinking and as the stories have unfolded, I believe I am right with the true story.http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/09/21/boldly-into-the-breach/
[Note from Christine: GO READ THAT LINK!!!!]
*******
To: bert
To complex and fragile to be real How so? It fits every verifiable detail as to timing and placement of personnel. Stevens stayed later than everyone else (who left in August, I believe). The video was an excuse. It had been released months earlier, and even the Libyans said there was no protest...that is was a terrorist act. The security personnel were removed and indigenous personnel comprised the security team. There WAS media babble about releasing the 'blind sheik' What exactly DOESN'T fit? ----- IMHO, the principle of Occam's razor applies. That among competing hypotheses, the one which makes the fewest assumptions should be selected. I can find no 'assumptions' in the author's theory, and the one assumption previously posed by another FReeper fits the facts as well. It would explain WHY Obama wasn't concerned about the 3am phone call and why NOTHING was done while our people were being murdered. One has to wonder what those people who ignored those cries for help are thinking now.
30posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 9:21:27 AMby MamaTexan(I am a Person as Created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
*******
To: Kozy
Were the two Seals in the room with Stephens and Smith when the “guard” was taking the pictures? The pictures were being sent to someone and they would have been noticed. Or maybe they were being sent for ID reasons but it was something Smith wrote about on Eve online to his friend. He was so perturbed he mentioned they mightn’t get out alive.
33posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 9:25:15 AMby bronxville(Margaret Sanger - “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,Â)
*******
Posts
