I'm so glad to see that American Crossroads is firing back with a great ad that hits the bullseye directly at the critics of Fox News (as well as conservative bloggers and others). All the other cable news and regular news show kept the status quo to protect the Dem criminals involved. ABC and others previously tried to play along with the lies coming out of the ObaMARXIST BADministration and the State Department (Hillary Clinton's lying butt on the line re: presidential run in 2016) over the past 8 months.
See more American Crossroads videos HERE.
Also, as Legal Insurrection characterized it:
Benghazi leaks finally breaking the damn media dam - ABC News: Exclusive: Benghazi Talking Points Underwent 12 Revisions, Scrubbed of Terror Reference.
Hmmm....I guess ABC is one alphabet soup media of mass corruption outfit that has finally decided to start telling the truth regarding the Benghazi terrorist attack of 9/11/12 and the subsequent 8 month cover-up that ensued.
It's about time!!
Hope this ends Hillary's chances in 2016 and runs Obamafraud out of the White House, like Mike Huckabee has predicted. And Mr. Zero can take Biden with him!
The next-in-line still standing in official Constitutional lineage after the scandal sends the crooks (Hillary, Obama, Biden) packing, is Republican House Speaker, John Boehner. What a glorious day THAT will be!
Hat tips to all links.
Showing posts with label Hillary Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hillary Clinton. Show all posts
Friday, May 10, 2013
Wednesday, May 08, 2013
Benghazi Whistle Blower Testimony Expose O's BADministration Lies and Cover-Up!
I watched most of the hearing where three Benghazi terrorist attack whistle blowers testified and exposed the lies and cover-up of the Obama BADministration. The testimony was emotional at times, riveting at other times, and ultimately stunning when we recall all of the lies that were drummed up and told by Hillary, Obama, and other administration officials, as well as the talking heads (including former Amb. Susan Rice, Jay Carney etc.) that supported and continued to spread the Benghazi LIES and false narrative.
How anyone could possibly think that this BADministration (with all who are directly involved) deserves to stay in office after exposure of this awful terrorist murder/cover-up just goes to show how far supporters of their criminality continues to grow into a cesspool of bitter and dangerous evil!!
The sinful ability of all those involved in the cover-up to "see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil" was obviously used to hide the truth; and they all deliberately lied about it in order to get Obummer re-elected! It's all just so absolutely absurd, traitorous, and mind boggling!
Pressed for time tonight, but CommieBlaster has a good roundup of articles and posts to read:
I sincerely hope that the investigation goes on and that more whistleblowers and survivors of the Benghazi terrorist attack will come forward and testify against this treasonous Obama regime!
How anyone could possibly think that this BADministration (with all who are directly involved) deserves to stay in office after exposure of this awful terrorist murder/cover-up just goes to show how far supporters of their criminality continues to grow into a cesspool of bitter and dangerous evil!!
The sinful ability of all those involved in the cover-up to "see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil" was obviously used to hide the truth; and they all deliberately lied about it in order to get Obummer re-elected! It's all just so absolutely absurd, traitorous, and mind boggling!
Pressed for time tonight, but CommieBlaster has a good roundup of articles and posts to read:
I sincerely hope that the investigation goes on and that more whistleblowers and survivors of the Benghazi terrorist attack will come forward and testify against this treasonous Obama regime!
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
The "Unaware" Claims Regarding Benghazi Survivor Threats
I have been trying really hard not to talk about Obama (O) as often as I did in the past here at this blog. The reason? Because everything he did (and will do in the future) will one day "fall to dust and blow away." (ht: Jars of Clay lyrics from "Worlds Apart.")
The lyrics in that song express how different a person is once Christ enters the heart in the form of the Holy Spirit and becomes Lord and Savior over one's life. But it also could apply to how different one sees the world around him/her when he or she know God's Word and compares this fallen world to Christ's Kingdom and our future heavenly dwelling place. More on this in a future post.
This morning, I tried to listen to Obama's news conference. Ed Henry of The Fox News Channel was called upon first to ask questions. He asked about the "red line" Obama stated regarding the use of chemical weapons in Syria, and O just bloviated on and on about it; claiming that it doesn't just involve America (and him) but includes the international community (a.k.a. the do-nothing U.N.) blah blah blah.
No surprise there.
However, I was waiting for the answer to the second question - the one about how the Benghazi survivors are being threatened into silence regarding the attack there that claimed the lives of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Special Ops Navy SEALS Tyrone Woods, Sean Smith, and Glen Doherty on September 11, 2012.
No surprise that I would be sorely disappointed in O's response. After taking was seemed like FOREVER to discuss "stuff" (he uses middle school terminology and he's a Harvard grad? sheesh....) regarding Syria, he spends about a few seconds on the Benghazi question. And get this...he claimed not to know anything about the blocking of survivors testimonies about Benghazi by his BADministration!!! At that point, I had to turn the T.V. off.
That is "unaware" claim number one.
How many fools in that room and Obots watching on T.V. could possibly believe such lying drivel???
Fortunately, there will be more hearings in Congress and the information is said to be "explosive."
Several blogs discussing the topic are listed below. Read the comments, too, and you will learn more!
The Ulsterman Report: Special Ops Benghazi Survivor Speaks Out Against Obama Administration (M.I. RELATED)
The Ulsterman Report: BREAKING: Obama Administration Intimidating Benghazi Massacre Survivors Into Silence
Gretawire.Fox News Insider: THREATS AGAINST BENGHAZI WHISTLE BLOWERS ALLEGED
Copy of Gretawire post:
Benghazi: Threats against ‘Whistleblowers’ Alleged*******
By James Rosen
At least four career officials at the State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency have retained lawyers, or are in the process of doing so, as they prepare to provide sensitive information about the Benghazi attacks to Congress, Fox News has learned.
Victoria Toensing, a former Justice Department official and Republican counsel to the Senate intelligence committee, is now representing one of the State Department employees. She told Fox News her client and some of the others, who consider themselves whistle blowers, have been threatened by unnamed Obama administration officials.
“I’m not talking generally, I’m talking specifically about Benghazi – that people have been threatened,” Toensing said in an interview Monday. “And not just the State Department. People have been threatened at the CIA.”
Toensing declined to name her client. She also refused to say whether the individual was on the ground in Benghazi on the night of September 11, 2012, when terrorist attacks on two U.S. installations in the Libyan city killed four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens.
However, Toensing disclosed that her client has pertinent information on all three time periods investigators consider relevant to the attacks: the months that led up to September 11, when pleas by the ambassador and his staff for enhanced security in Benghazi were mostly rejected by senior officers at the State Department; the eight-hour time frame in which the attacks unfolded; and the eight-day period that followed the attacks, when Obama administration officials falsely described them as the result of a spontaneous protest over a video.
“It’s frightening and they’re doing some very despicable threats to people,” she said. “Not ‘We’re going to kill you,’ or not ‘We’re going to prosecute you tomorrow,’ but they’re taking career people and making them well aware that their careers will be over [if they cooperate with congressional investigators].”
Federal law provides explicit protections for federal government employees who are identified as “whistleblowers.” The laws aim to ensure these individuals will not face repercussions from their superiors, or from other quarters, in retaliation for their provision of information about corruption or other forms of wrongdoing to Congress, or to an agency’s inspector-general.
Rep. Darrell Issa, the Republican from California who chairs the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, wrote to Secretary of State John Kerry on April 26 to complain that the department has not provided a process by which attorneys like Toensing can receive the security clearances necessary for them to review classified documents and other key evidence.
“It is unavoidable that Department employees identifying themselves as witnesses in the Committee’s investigation will apply for a security clearance to allow their personal attorneys to handle sensitive or classified material,” Issa wrote. “The Department’s unwillingness to make the process for clearing an attorney more transparent appears to be an effort to interfere with the rights of employees to furnish information to Congress.”
The Obama administration maintains that it has been more than forthcoming on Benghazi and that it is time for the State Department to move on. At a recent hearing before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Kerry noted that administration officials have testified at eight hearings on Benghazi, provided twenty briefings on the subject, and turned over to Congress some 25,000 documents related to the killings.
“So if you have additional questions or, you think there’s some document that somehow you need, I’ll work with you to try to get it and see if we can provide that to you,” Kerry told committee chairman Rep. Ed Royce, also a Republican from California, on April 17. But Kerry added: “I do not want to spend the next year coming up here talking about Benghazi.”
Asked about Issa’s complaints about attorneys not receiving security clearances, State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell on Monday indicated that – far from threatening anyone – the administration hasn’t been presented with any such cases. “I’m not aware of private counsel seeking security clearances or — or anything to that regard,” Ventrell told reporters. “I’m not aware of whistle blowers one way or another.”
Ventrell cited the work of the FBI – whose probe of the attacks continues, almost eight months later and without any known instances of perpetrators being brought to justice – and the Accountability Review Board. The ARB was an internal State Department review panel led by former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Thomas Pickering and former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen. An unclassified version of the ARB’s final report that was released to the public contained no conclusions that suggested administration officials had willfully endangered their colleagues in Benghazi or had misled the public or Congress.
“And that should be enough,” Ventrell said at Monday’s press briefing. “Congress has its own prerogatives, but we’ve had a very thorough, independent investigation, which we completed and [which was] transparent and shared. And there are many folks who are, in a political manner, trying to sort of use this for their own political means, or ends.”
———————
James Rosen
Chief Washington Correspondent
Host, “The Foxhole”
And here we have "unaware" claim number two:
Asked about Issa’s complaints about attorneys not receiving security clearances, State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell on Monday indicated that – far from threatening anyone – the administration hasn’t been presented with any such cases. “I’m not aware of private counsel seeking security clearances or — or anything to that regard,” Ventrell told reporters. “I’m not aware of whistle blowers one way or another.”
Really??? Who in their right mind would believe such bull**it???
Of course we have the new Secretary of State - John Kerry - covering for this BADministration just like Hillary did:
“So if you have additional questions or, you think there’s some document that somehow you need, I’ll work with you to try to get it and see if we can provide that to you,” Kerry told committee chairman Rep. Ed Royce, also a Republican from California, on April 17. But Kerry added: “I do not want to spend the next year coming up here talking about Benghazi.”
Yes!!! And we can all certainly surmise exactly WHY Kerry doesn't "want to spend the next year coming up here talking about Benghazi!!! " It takes a lot of lying and evil machinations to keep a cover-up this big going.
Hmmm...a certain lyric from a song called Won't Get Fooled Again by The Who just popped into my mind...
"meet the new boss...same as the old boss..."
I am really grateful and thankful for these whistle blower patriots who won't allow the threats from this BADministration to silence them!!!
The truth will come out...it always does!!!
Hat tips to all links.
*******
On second thought, another 40 second portion of the press conference turned out to be worthwhile:
Comment there:
RedBeard
My response? YES!!!!! PACK UP AND GO HOME!!! - TO CHICAGO AFTER YOU ARE IMPEACHED AND RUN OUT OF OFFICE!!!
Monday, January 28, 2013
News Roundup
No surprise that the media-of-mass-corruption's malpractice after Hillary's Benghazi testimony continues. (see links below)
Monday Catch-Up: More Media Malpractice on Benghazi
*******
Memory Hole Blog has a new post up where an inquisitive couple visits Newtown, Connecticut seeking answers.
You might want to go there, view the photos and the commentary.
Excerpt:
Read the rest and view the photos:
Memory Hole Blog: An Inquisitive Couple’s Visit to Newtown, Connecticut
January 28, 2013 · 9:00 am
Photos and Commentary by Scott DeLarm
Edited by James F. Tracy
*******
My response:
Some observations.
When this visiting couple questioned the chaplain if she had seen any children whom had been impacted…why wouldn’t she answer? That is just evidence of even more suspicious secrecy surrounding this event.
About that handwritten sign that says, “there is no foot so tiny that it can’t leave an imprint on this world.” Too bad they don’t feel the same way about the millions of tiny feet who have been aborted in the womb.
I ask. Is such a sign as the “foot so tiny” one the first (or second, or third, or fourth) thought that one would genuinely have and desire to display after such a tragedy such as this? Seems quite strange to me.
The “we’re with you Newtown” sign from “your friends in Tucson, Arizona” seems very strange! “We’re with you” sounds more like a cheer sign one would read at a sporting event – not after a tragedy where 26 were murdered!
The second “no entry beyond this point” sign misspelled “prosecuted.” Who made that blunder?
When a local is asked about “Satanic activity” and replies “I could believe that,” then we know that it isn’t just a conspiracy theory to think that enormous evil surrounds this town and ultimately, this entire scenario.
Masonry has it’s own kind of “magic and spells” which are of the occult; which is of the devil, as well. [Update note: I read elsewhere that "Freemasons" are often involved in child sex trafficking. Need to find that link again and post it here. Makes me so sick to my stomach...]
What is with the “Shh…co.” imagery with the heart inside the hand? Is that a coded message for the residents to keep their mouths shut or what?
The newspaper lady admitted that she knew of “conspiracy theories floating out there.” Isn’t it strange that she would send people to Snopes.com? It’s a far left liberal website that can easily say what it wants instead of seeking the truth in any matter.
The female sergeant is just regurgitating the same old lines.
Why weren’t there any photos of the inside of the school released? There were after Columbine.
Why the rush to demolish the school? Hide the evidence (or lack thereof) if, in fact, a hoax was perpetrated??
All of this is very eerie…and creepy…to say the least!
P.S. Were there any churches involved in the memorial site placements after this tragedy? Besides what appears to be one back yard memorial with small crosses, everything else seems too “secular” in the aftermath of this terrible even.t
Also, a chaplain could be a person of any belief system and is not the same thing as a pastor, priest, or rabbi.
*******
Update: My friend Steve has a video up over at Cry and Howl that exposes the fact that ABC, CBS, NBC Admit No Assault Rifle Used at Sandy Hook
*******
Hat tips to all links.
For more information that the media of mass deception isn't covering, please see these sites:
Sites Investigating Sandy Hook Shooting
Monday Catch-Up: More Media Malpractice on Benghazi
nicedeb at Nice Deb - 24 minutes ago
Big Journalism is all over that sham of an interview Obama and Hillary gave to Steve Kroft of 60 Minutes, Sunday. If you spared yourselves the frustration of watching it, John Nolte and Larry O’Conner can fill you in. It was as precisely as pathetic as you thought it would be. John Nolte: Martha Raddatz, [...]
Hillary Gives Away the Game
GOD'S WORD IS FOUND IN THE BIBLE AND THE BIBLE ALONE. The truth in the Bible is not subject to affirmation by a majority vote.
American Thinker - 11 hours ago
During her Benghazi testimony last week, all at once, before the whole world, one of the highest ranking progressive authoritarians on the planet spilled the beans -- all of them -- about the left's modus operandi.
Video: Judge Jeanine Pirro Hails Hillary’s “Washington Side Step”
nicedeb at Nice Deb - 20 hours ago
After confiding that she took dance classes as a girl, Jeanine Pirro feels qualified to spot a good dancer when she sees one. “There is one woman who can reeeeally dance,” Pirro purred, as she introduced the “What difference does it make!” clip from Hillary’s Senate testimony, last week. “She can do a two step [...]
*******
In addition, those who voted for BHO a second time (especially if they call themselves Christians) should be absolutely ashamed for going against God's truth in the Bible in order to elect a tyrant into office for a second time!
Did God Exalt Obama to the Presidency?
American Thinker - 1 day ago
If you're a believer who takes the Bible seriously, you have asked yourself this question many times.
*******
In a world filled with sin, immorality, lies, evil, death, and confusion, it is good to know that:
*******
Excerpt:
One of the more creepy excerpts:
My partner and I became fed up with the mainstream media’s depiction of what took place in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14, 2012. So on January 20 we traveled there from our home in Ottawa Canada in an effort to visit the sites and respectfully approach the locals.
Before we even got off the highway there was a display of dozens of American flags on the shoulder. There is a large tented memorial located just off the freeway. The tent had a sign on the outside, “Sandy Hook Memorial Never Forgotten.” Inside the tent was a chaplain who asked that I not take any photos. There were hundreds of stuffed animals and candles as well as children’s art from around the country–if not the world. Inside was also a donation jar that was at mid-afternoon close to full of money. We signed one of the boards with condolences from Canada. I saw adults and children inside the tent on the two visits we made. No one was there who was impacted directly. I asked the chaplain if she had seen any children whom had been impacted. She did not answer.
We sat at the 100 Church Hill Restaurant for a couple of hours. There were about 10 people inside. There were about 100 drawings from children from around the country (if not the world) offering condolences and well wishes. No one was talking about these. My partner and I spoke with a couple in their early twenties for an hour or so. They were life long locals. Eventually they asked why we were in Newtown and we told them we had heard of their tragedy. They did not comment further and we did not push the issue. Later, I mentioned that I had read online where some people had suggested that Newtown might have a lively Satanic community. One of the two locals remarked, “I could believe that.”
Read the rest and view the photos:
Memory Hole Blog: An Inquisitive Couple’s Visit to Newtown, Connecticut
January 28, 2013 · 9:00 am
Photos and Commentary by Scott DeLarm
Edited by James F. Tracy
*******
My response:
Some observations.
When this visiting couple questioned the chaplain if she had seen any children whom had been impacted…why wouldn’t she answer? That is just evidence of even more suspicious secrecy surrounding this event.
About that handwritten sign that says, “there is no foot so tiny that it can’t leave an imprint on this world.” Too bad they don’t feel the same way about the millions of tiny feet who have been aborted in the womb.
I ask. Is such a sign as the “foot so tiny” one the first (or second, or third, or fourth) thought that one would genuinely have and desire to display after such a tragedy such as this? Seems quite strange to me.
The “we’re with you Newtown” sign from “your friends in Tucson, Arizona” seems very strange! “We’re with you” sounds more like a cheer sign one would read at a sporting event – not after a tragedy where 26 were murdered!
The second “no entry beyond this point” sign misspelled “prosecuted.” Who made that blunder?
When a local is asked about “Satanic activity” and replies “I could believe that,” then we know that it isn’t just a conspiracy theory to think that enormous evil surrounds this town and ultimately, this entire scenario.
Masonry has it’s own kind of “magic and spells” which are of the occult; which is of the devil, as well. [Update note: I read elsewhere that "Freemasons" are often involved in child sex trafficking. Need to find that link again and post it here. Makes me so sick to my stomach...]
What is with the “Shh…co.” imagery with the heart inside the hand? Is that a coded message for the residents to keep their mouths shut or what?
The newspaper lady admitted that she knew of “conspiracy theories floating out there.” Isn’t it strange that she would send people to Snopes.com? It’s a far left liberal website that can easily say what it wants instead of seeking the truth in any matter.
The female sergeant is just regurgitating the same old lines.
Why weren’t there any photos of the inside of the school released? There were after Columbine.
Why the rush to demolish the school? Hide the evidence (or lack thereof) if, in fact, a hoax was perpetrated??
All of this is very eerie…and creepy…to say the least!
P.S. Were there any churches involved in the memorial site placements after this tragedy? Besides what appears to be one back yard memorial with small crosses, everything else seems too “secular” in the aftermath of this terrible even.t
Also, a chaplain could be a person of any belief system and is not the same thing as a pastor, priest, or rabbi.
*******
Update: My friend Steve has a video up over at Cry and Howl that exposes the fact that ABC, CBS, NBC Admit No Assault Rifle Used at Sandy Hook
*******
Hat tips to all links.
For more information that the media of mass deception isn't covering, please see these sites:
Sites Investigating Sandy Hook Shooting
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Benghazi Explained: Interview With an “Intelligence Insider”
An Intelligence Insider explains what REALLY transpired before, during, and after the Benghazi attack on September 11, 2012. I sincerely hope that this insider shared this information with Congress. I'm physically ill over this!!! This is TREASON people!! Those responsible are traitors to America! And the media of mass deception is complicit in the continuing cover-up!!
Anyone who voted for BHO again should be TOTALLY ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES!!!!
~ Christine
*******
First link and copy of post:
Canada Free Press: Administration is engaged in a massive cover-up Benghazi explained: Interview with an “Intelligence Insider”
Copy of Part I post from Northeast Intelligence blog:
Anyone who voted for BHO again should be TOTALLY ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES!!!!
~ Christine
*******
First link and copy of post:
Canada Free Press: Administration is engaged in a massive cover-up Benghazi explained: Interview with an “Intelligence Insider”
Copy of Part I post from Northeast Intelligence blog:
27 November 2012: This is part one of a multi-part interview with a government insider intimately familiar with the events that took place in Benghazi. In this part, he provides important background, and explains that this administration is engaged in a massive cover-up.
DH: It’s been a while since we’ve discussed Benghazi. What have you heard lately?
II: Before I answer that, I want to get a few things off my chest. Every politician, whether it’s a congressman senator, diplomat, or their spokespeople and the media are lying to the American public every time they call the location of the attack a consulate. It was not. There was absolutely no diplomatic consulate in Benghazi. None. Words are important here. They can create a wrong image, an incorrect picture of what was really going on. The property where our Ambassador and other Americans were murdered was a rented villa consisting of a primary residence with a couple of outbuildings behind the actual house. The reason they’re still calling it a consulate is to subtly divert any questions about our activities there.
DH: Let’s go over this again; exactly what was taking place at Benghazi?
II: As I said, the place where the attack happened is one of the largest, one of the most active CIA operation centers in North Africa, if not in the entire Middle East. It was not a diplomatic station. It was a planning and operations center, a logistics hub for weapons and arms being funneled out of Libya. Unlike the embassy in Tripoli, there was limited security in Benghazi. Why? So the operation did not draw attention to what was going on there
.
DH: So in reality there were no actual security issues?
II: Oh yes, there were, in Tripoli. Diplomatic cables show that. But it was for the embassy in Tripoli, the Ambassador and the diplomatic staff in general, not specifically for the Benghazi location for two reasons. First, the Benghazi location was a CIA operation, not a diplomatic one. Visible security at that location would draw unwanted attention there. They had to blend in. Remember, the villa was located in a somewhat residential area, sort of like the suburbs. Secondly, additional manpower was not needed there, at this CIA center, as the operation was already winding down.
DH: I know you’ve gone over this before, but let’s get into the specifics of the operation at Benghazi.
II: Good, I want to be clear. After Gaddafi was taken out, there was the matter of his weapons and arms that were hidden all over Libya, including chemical weapons – gas weapons. According to Obama and Hillary Clinton, we were in Libya to collect and destroy these weapons to make for a ‘safer’ Libya. That’s what they were telling the American public. That’s not really what was going on, though, and it seems like all of the other nations except the average American knew it. Anyway, you can find pictures and videos of weapons caches being destroyed, but that is strictly for the public’s consumption.
What was really happening, before Gaddafi’s body was even cold, is that we had people locating caches of weapons, separating the working from those that weren’t, and making a big show of destroying the weapons, but only the weapons that were useless. The working weapons were being given to Islamic terrorists. They were being funneled through Libya, crisscrossing Libya on a Muslim Brotherhood managed strategic supply route. In fact, Michael Reagan called it the modern day equivalent of the Ho Chi Minh Trail in a recent article he wrote, and he is correct.
The entire arms and weapons running operation was headquartered in Benghazi, The weapons were actually being shipped out of Libya from the port city of Dernah, located about a hundred miles east of Benghazi. That was the ‘choke point’ of the weapons being shipped out. Remember the Lusitania? Think in those terms, ships carrying weapons hid among ‘humanitarian aid.’ By the time of the attacks, an estimated 30-40 million pounds of arms were already transported out of Libya.
From there, the weapons were being sent to staging areas in Turkey near the Syrian border, for use by the Free Syrian Army and other ragtag terrorist groups to fight against Assad. The objective was and still is to destabilize the Assad government.
DH: Why Syria, why not Iran?
II: It’s both, but Syria is the primary target here for this operation. First, look at the bigger picture, look at the so-called “Arab Spring.” Who benefits and by default, who doesn’t? Who is the architect for what’s going on throughout the Middle East and North Africa? Whose agenda is being implemented? To specifically address Benghazi, though, look at the bigger picture here and what is trying to be accomplished.
The Obama administration is playing the role of Saudi Arabia’s private army. I think if Americans knew this, they would be outraged. Our service men and women are being sold out as mercenaries for the wants and desires of the Royal family, for the Saudi’s interests. It’s about religious dominance and oil. Who is really benefiting from, say, what’s going on in Egypt? Mubarek is out, and the Muslim Brotherhood is in. Who does that benefit? Saudi Arabia.
Look at what we see happening in Egypt. Destabilization. Do you think the Russians want that? Hell no. Syria is Russia’s red line in the sand, as you earlier wrote. If Syria is lost to the Muslim Brotherhood by the actions of Obama, Hillary Clinton and others in this administration, what happens? Well, it will have an adverse impact on Russia from a military standpoint. They will likely lose access to their Mediterranean deep water port in Syria, which is Tartus.
But think further – three dimensionally. Russia is still the world’s largest oil producer, and that’s Russia’s primary source of income. Then there’s Turkey, adjacent to Syria. A large amount of Russian oil and gas, consumed by the West, flows through Turkey, which is also a player in this operation.
So, the destabilization of Syria which is exactly what Obama and Clinton are trying to do, presents a direct military and economic threat to Russia. Assad at least has kept things in check in Syria. Can you imagine Assad being replaced by someone like Morsi? That would strike at the very heart of Russia’s economic health and military capabilities. Think of what’s at stake here. Do Americans want a regional war? World War III? Has Obama or Clinton asked the American people if this is what they want?
Make no mistake, we are doing the bidding for Saudi Arabia. The U.S., NATO and other allies are engaged in a proxy war with Iran and Russia.
What about Assad’s war crimes?
Assad is no angel, but don’t be fooled by the death toll attributed to him. Now this is important. Remember the first Gulf War? In the run up to Desert Storm, a young woman testified before the Human Rights Caucus – she only testified under her first name, which was Nayirah. Remember that she testified that Iraqi soldiers were taking infants from incubators in Kuwait, leaving them to die? Her testimony was supposedly confirmed by Amnesty International. Her testimony went viral, and every war hawk in the U.S. government cited her testimony, saying we needed to right the wrongs, the inhumanity. It was all one big lie!
After Desert Storm, it was revealed that Nayirah’s last name was Al-Sabah, and she was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States. Her testimony was part of a publicity campaign organized by Citizens for a Free Kuwait, which was run by Hill & Knowlton, a PR firm out of New York. People must learn the back story.
So we see a body count attributed to Assad. Who’s doing the killing, Assad’s people? Maybe at times, but the Free Syrian Army and other groups are doing most of the slaughter. It’s one huge ‘false flag’ operation and the media is selling it hard. And Americans are buying it, just like the testimony of the girl from Kuwait.
It’s one big lie being told by Obama, Clinton, Rice, and others. Many Americans are buying the lie, and the media is selling the lie. The people behind this are laughing at us. Don’t you get it? They’re laughing at us.
And do you want to know what’s at stake? Four Americans were killed in Benghazi. Forty thousand have been killed so far in Syria. Tens of thousands of Syrian people have become refugees. Why? For what? To advance the agenda of Saudi Arabia. For oil.
You know, the so-called right wing establishment were all up in arms about Obama’s submissive bow to the Saudi King. Where are they now? Where’ the outrage that the body count will be much greater than Forty thousand? It is anticipated that if the Obama plan succeeds, not only will America be committed to yet another war, but the body count could be as high as FOUR MILLION. Christians, among others, will be slaughtered. This could trigger a third world war, it’s that serious.
What is Russia and Iran doing? Certainly, they must be fighting back.
Benghazi was a strike against us, the Obama-Clinton agenda. A visible strike, and I’ll explain more about this shortly, because there are events I will point out that will put it all into perspective. But think of it this way. How did we successfully collapse the Soviet Union? I mean, what was the last straw? We attacked their currency – the Ruble. They’re still stinging from that, and Putin was in the KGB at the time. Do you think he forgot about that?
So, how does, or will Russia and Iran strike back if Obama and Clinton continue this insanity? Militarily? Possibly in regional conflicts, but to take us out, to stop us, what is the one area we are very vulnerable? It’s our economy – our dollar. What’s our dollar tied to? Not gold or silver anymore, and some say it’s not tied to anything. Well, that’s not quite correct. It’s tied to OIL. The free-flow of oil.
Oil transactions everywhere in the world, including Russia and China, are made with U.S. dollars. We buy their oil with our dollars, and they return with those same paper dollars and employ Americans by buying our goods and services. As Michael Reagan wrote: “[t]his system is also crucial to the security of our diplomatic and legal infrastructure, which is ultimately backed by our military. It’s the core of our foreign policy.” He also wrote that “any attack on the free flow of oil is an attack on the dollar. Any attack on the dollar is an attack on our ability to project power and protect Western democracies, economies, and ideals. God have mercy on us all if that attack is successful!”
END OF PART I
*******
Part II from Northeast Intelligence blog: Benghazi explained: Interview with an “Intelligence Insider” (Part II)
Copy of post:
*******
Part II from Northeast Intelligence blog: Benghazi explained: Interview with an “Intelligence Insider” (Part II)
Copy of post:
Please comment at Canada Free Press
Obama does not want the American people to know the truth about what is going on, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, AQIM
By Douglas J. HagmannObama does not want the American people to know the truth about what is going on, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, AQIM
29 November 2012: Author’s note: This is part two of a multi-part interview with a government insider intimately familiar with the events that took place in Benghazi. It is important to note that the information contained in this series was developed from interviews that spanned over 100 hours. In this part, the insider provides information about the events of the attack and the continuation of the cover-up at the highest levels of our government. (For Part I, please click here).
We’ve heard different accounts and different timelines concerning the attack at Benghazi. What exactly happened?
First, people must understand that the compound that was attacked was situated in a somewhat rural area and was not a consulate, but a rented villa, or a residential structure. The residence was the primary building, and what has been referred to as the annex was located about 1800 feet away as the crow flies, but just over a mile to travel by road. And again, visible security was not present as the compound was the headquarters for a covert operation. No one wanted to draw attention to what was taking place at this location.
The first indications of problems there began at least twelve-(12) hours before the first shot was even fired. One of the men at the compound observed a policeman or Libyan security officer taking photographs outside of the villa. Keep in mind that Ambassador Stevens, the point man in this Obama-sanctioned weapons running operation, was hastily scheduled to meet with the Turkish consul general at this location. The meeting was deliberately planned for dinner time, toward evening, when the events that happened next could be performed under the cover of darkness.
It’s also important to consider the location of this meeting. Tripoli is the seat of power in Libya, and a genuine diplomatic meeting could more safely have been conducted there, at the embassy. Also, what most people don’t know is that Libya is split, much like East and West Germany before the wall. The eastern part is more closely aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood, the same group that controls Egypt. The Turkish consul general had to meet there, not just with Stevens but with other factions involved in this covert operation.
Now I’ll digress for a moment. It is reasonable to ask whether the Turkish consul general was setting Stevens up for a hit, like a classic mob-style hit. First, there is no dispute that there was surveillance done at 6:30 a.m. Next, consider that three hours before the first shot was fired, about 6:30 p.m. local time, some strange things were observed taking place near the compound. Military type vehicles began closing of the streets with trucks that had 50 caliber guns mounted on them. Checkpoints on the streets and at intersections were being quietly closed off around the compound. Nearby residents began going inside their homes. Anyone walking in the area got off the streets, like a scene from a movie in the Godfather series. It was obvious that the stage was being set for a strike against the compound. This alone reveals pre-planning and coordination.
It’s also noteworthy to point out that the Turkish counsel general most likely passed through one or more of these checkpoints, or at least would have noticed that things were not right in the area. You must remember that just as Stevens was CIA with diplomatic cover, the Turkish counsel general was his counterpart. It’s typical spy versus spy stuff.
Also consider this. One of the men stationed at the compound, a British national, left the compound at about 9:20 a.m., reportedly to get more phone cards. That’s right, phone cards, like you would buy at Walmart. Why? Because the men at the compound ran out of minutes. Just who do you think they were talking to that day to burn through the minutes, and why do you think they needed them at that exact time?
They were using the phones as a last and perhaps only line of communications to provide assessments of the strange things going on earlier. They knew that something was being planned and they were conveying that information – their observations to those who could assist them, in Tripoli and DC.
Based on these activities, it is clear that the men at the compound suspected that they were in trouble long before the first shot was ever fired. they were calling anyone who would listen, or who should have listened. We knew trouble brewing and no one responded in any meaningful way.
Could the man who left to buy more phone cards have known what was about to take place?
Well, it’s possible, but there is no indication of that.
Was the Turkish counsel general in on this, to set Stevens up?
Well, what have we heard from our government? Has anyone even bothered to interview him? What did he say? Don’t forget, this administration decided to handle this attack as a crime and not a terrorist attack. How long did it take for the FBI to be able to access the ‘crime scene’ after the attack? More importantly, what was left at the ‘crime scene’ to examine by the FBI due to this delay. Do you think the delay was accidental?
Do you know what was discussed, or the reason for the meeting between Stevens and the Turkish consul general?
Yes, I know some key points. First, keep in mind what this arms running operation was all about. It was to topple Assad and replace him with a Muslim Brotherhood leader. It was to destabilize Syria to advance the agenda of Saudi Arabia. They were using U.S. and NATO forces to do exactly that.
However, Assad is no Gaddafi, and there is no comparison between Assad’s army and the Libyan army. It would take much more than rebels inside Syria to topple Assad. There is no way on earth that the Syrian rebels, or Free Syrian Army, has the capability to accomplish this objective alone. It required U.S. assistance, arms and training.
Now, Turkey is a NATO ally. They were assisting the Obama-Clinton-Saudi plan to funnel weapons ultimately to Syria, but the primary staging areas for these weapons were in Turkey near the Syrian border. Visual surveillance by Russia, using satellites and other means amassed photographic documentation of the U.S. assisting the ‘anti-Assad rebels’ inside Turkey. They developed evidence of the U.S. training these rebels and assisting them into Syria to fight against Assad.
Think about this. What if surveillance images observed anti-Assad rebels being trained to handle and mount chemical weapons – gas shells – onto rockets? The process would be apparent and would obviously be detected by a number of visual indicators. Obviously, Syria wanted this to stop. By extension, so did Russia.
One aspect of the weapons plan was to set up a false flag operation to make it appear that Assad used chemical weapons against his own people. Imagine the outcry from the civilized world to the news that Assad ‘gassed’ his own people. That would be an invitation to NATO and the West to openly intervene. Don’t forget about the timing of all of this. Two months before the elections, and time was running out. The job of taking out Assad was not yet complete. Such an event would quickly advance this agenda. By this time, however, being caught and placed in a rather unenviable position between Russia and the U.S., the Turkish consul general was in a ‘CYA, clean-up’ mode, assuring that none of the chemical weapons that might have still been in Libya were headed for Turkey.
It is also important to understand that the covert weapons running operation was just about finished. An estimated 40 million pounds of weapons were already shipped from Libya, and things were winding down.
There was another issue as well, a very important and telling one. Seven members of the Iranian Red Crescent had been kidnapped or snatched from the streets of Benghazi on or about July 31, 2012. Again you must understand that virtually anyone walking on the streets of Benghazi not indigenous to the area are spies. Covert operatives, operating under various covers. From all nations.
Along with the message that the weapons running operation was compromised, the Iranians had good reason to suspect that the ‘Red Crescent workers’ were snatched by the CIA or with their assistance. Iran wanted them back. They were spies, and countries want their spies back! So part of the meeting was to address this, as there was pressure by Russia against a wavering Turkey to switch sides. Anyway, you’ll see how this ties in to the way the actual attack was executed.
Please continue.
So at 9:30 pm local time, the compound began to take on small arms fire. Based on all reports I’ve reviewed, there were three twelve-man attack teams armed with small arms, RPGs, and other sophisticated military style weapons. These were not run-of-the-mill street weapons, but military issued type weapons. The types of weapons alone scream that this was a preplanned attack.
Eyes on the area [author's note: satellites, surveillance drones] confirmed that two of these teams surrounded the villa and the annex. The third team was elsewhere, lying in wait. The two teams began their assault on the compound where Stevens was inside about an hour after the Turkish counsel general left. Remember, he had to pass the checkpoints after the meeting. Just keep that in mind.
Anyway, we all know now that there was an intense firefight that lasted nearly nine hours during which four Americans, Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Dougherty and Tyrone Woods were killed. And of course that attack was not over a video and there were no protests before the attack.
Now there are questions that are not being asked. The two well-armed ‘hit teams’ had the capability to reduce the compound and annex to rubble quickly. Why a protracted firefight? There are a couple of reasons.
First, what was the makeup of the ‘hit teams,’ or who were the attackers? We have verified that the attackers were a combination of members of Ansar al Sharia and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), but they were operating under the flag of Ansar al Sharia. Who is Ansar al Sharia? Iranian terrorists. They are a terrorist group that receives their training by and funding from Iran. Now think about this. Carefully consider the implications here. IRAN. It’s the elephant in the room no one wants to mention or talk about.
The attack on our ambassador and our people – Americans – was an attack by Iran. It was an attack at a nation-state level.
AQIM also assisted. They are indigenous to Africa and are extremely dangerous. AQIM is a very ‘elite’ and extremely well funded group, and very limited in number. Our last assessment suggests that there are only 400 or so members, but they are very influential across Africa and into South and Central America and Western Europe. Their importance and relevance will become evident shortly.
The reason that they did not just take out the compound and everything and everyone in it is that they were looking for their spies. Remember the Red Crescent workers? The Iranian spies? They suspected that they might be held at the annex. As such, they wanted to free them and did not want to risk killing them.
Oh, and there were others ‘missing’ as well. AQIM members. These were terrorists involved in drug running operations from the Tri-border (TBA) areas of South America through North Africa and into Western Europe. By the way, this is the way they made their money. Drugs sell at higher profits in Western Europe than elsewhere, so there is money to be made. The problem is that some of them got caught – snatched up in Benghazi and northeastern Libya.
Now regarding AQIM, this has a direct connection not only to South America, but also to Mexico and Mexican drug gangs. You think that what’s going on in Libya is just ‘over there,’ and far away from the U.S. and has nothing to do with our safety and security? Think again, but more on this in a bit.
There’s also another reason. The hit teams fully expected rescue teams from the U.S. to be dispatched to the compound. Certainly, calls for help went out. By waiting for the back-up or rescue forces, a surprise assault by the other ‘hit team’ team would have exposed our forces to possible causalities and turned the event into a much bigger event where the actual nature of the operation could be exposed to the world. Instead of being a cover-up for which they have yet to be held accountable, it would have been an international incident that would have exposed the entire affair.
So the Ansar al Sharia attack groups deliberately conducted a protracted assault on the compound. Just imagine, our men and even the bad guys never expected team Obama would leave our people twisting in the wind, fighting for their lives. That alone should speak volumes to every American.
As daylight approached, they had to wrap things up so they could disappear under the cover of darkness. Oh, and the crowds that are often cited by this administration, did form in the area as the attack progressed, much like a growing mob in riot. They provided the fog, or the cover, that permitted the attackers to escape amid the crowd.
You mentioned the missing Iranian Red Crescent workers and members of AQIM. Were they ever released or found?
Yes, and this is an extremely important part of this entire story. This reaches into the highest levels of our government. This is so very important that it must be addressed separately.
So the attack was first and the crowd came later. I noted that the administration said that there were protests going on at the Embassy in Cairo at the same time and they compared it to Benghazi.
Yes, that’s their cover story and they know that there is absolutely no comparison. This is one huge lie that is easily addressed and put out of its misery.
How soon did U.S. intelligence officials know who was responsible for the attack?
Almost immediately, if not concurrent with the attack. Every part of that area is under active aerial surveillance by the U.S. There was SIGINT or communication intercepts at the time of the attack. Then, there was even an admission by the attackers. Obama knew. Hillary knew. Clapper knew. Everyone knew, except the American people. And you know what? The American media knew as well.
I heard a statement that they did not admit knowledge to avoid alerting the perpetrators.
Yes, it was said that Rice and others did not want to alert the ‘bad guys’ or tip their hand or some such nonsense, but did that mean that Susan Rice, for example, had to appear on national television and lie to every one of us, to the country? In my opinion, Rice took on the temporary job of propaganda minister for a day in exchange for a shot at Secretary of State in the future.
You are painting quite a dire picture.
It gets worse, much worse, and it involves real threats across the globe and even to us here in the United States. But it’s all because of our actions, the covert weapons running from Libya to Syria by way of Turkey at the direction of Barack Obama and his Saudi ‘handlers.’
FORTY THOUSAND men, women and children are dead in Syria as a direct result of this attempt at nation building, or tearing down Assad. There are four dead Americans. We are arming some of the very people who are killing our troops. Not only are we on the wrong side of this, we are actively pushing the world to the precipice of World War III.
We are engaged in a real war here with Iran and Syria and by extension, with Russia and China. And we are being lied to about it every step of the way, and the lies are getting worse, but so are the attempts to stop the truth from getting out.
What do you mean?
What do you think the recent directive issued by Obama, the one you wrote about ‘insider threats,’ is all about? Obama does not want the American people to know the truth about what is going on. He’s doubled down to stop leaks, like this. But you know what? He just might be too late, because we’re not done here. I’m not done talking, and there’s much more that needs to be exposed.
Thursday, October 25, 2012
Tyrone Woods’ father: Hillary told me they would ‘prosecute’ filmmaker [UPDATE!!!]
Tyrone Woods’ father: Hillary told me they would ‘prosecute’ filmmaker
Excerpt:
It didn’t take long for many in the Muslim world to exploit the 9/11/12 attack in Benghazi by doing what the Obama administration did – they pointed to the Innocence of Muslims video. The video was being held up as an example of why it’s wrong to criticize anything Islam. We learned that before the attack, forces were already at work, plotting to call on international bodies as well as national governments to make any speech against or criticism of Islam a crime. At the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi called for restrictions on free speech.
The Obama administration pointed to the video as well. However, as the weeks have passed, a specific motive for doing so has been attributed to the administration. As the thinking goes, Obama and his team were using the video as an excuse so that the lack of security would not be exposed. It makes perfect sense. On October 19th, in a letter to Obama, Oversight Committee chairman Darrell Issa accused the administration of looking to “normalize” Libya despite an opposite reality on the ground. It’s become widely accepted that Obama, Hillary, et. al. wanted to use the video as a distraction and as an excuse.
This would necessarily mean that Islamists and the administration had adopted the same narrative but for different reasons.
Charles Woods, the father of Tyrone Woods, may have called that entire premise into question when he called in to the Lars Larson show on October 24th. In describing his visit with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton when the casket of his son and three other Americans arrived in at Andrews Air Force Base three days after their deaths.
Take note of what Charles says he was told by Hillary Clinton, beginning at the 6:15 mark (h/t Gather):
Charles Woods, Father of Former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods Who Gave His Life in Benghazi by TheLarsLarsonShow
If Hillary told Charles Woods that the filmmaker would be prosecuted, it meant that she was interested in criminalizing criticism of Islam as well. That would be a direct attack on the first amendment, which is something even the Obama administration is not yet willing to be seen as doing. Obama himself, in a PSA for Pakistan in which he appeared with Hillary, wouldn’t go that far publicly, saying there was “no justification for this senseless violence… none”. Again, Hillary accentuated the assertion that the “United States Government had absolutely nothing to do with this video” (I have always been intrigued by how adamantly she has stated that).
Read the rest HERE.
*******
I ask my fellow Americans - DO YOU SEE WHAT IT EXTREMELY WRONG ABOUT THIS PICTURE???
I recall the PUMA movement of 2008. All of the supporters of Hillary Clinton who HATED Barrack Hussein Obama and claimed that Obama "stole the election" from Hillary. I wonder...do they all see Hillary for who she really is??? Do they now, finally, understand that Hillary and Obama are one in the same radical liberal leftist socialist/communist/ Islamist/Sharia Law influenced BAD ACTORS FOR AMERICA????
When all is said and done, history will, one day, eventually reveal how DANGEROUS this TERRIBLE ADMINISTRATION has been to the United States of America!!!!
~ Christine
*******
EXPLOSIVE INFORMATION UPDATE!!!
SEAL father: Who denied military aid during Benghazi attack?
Excerpt:
It didn’t take long for many in the Muslim world to exploit the 9/11/12 attack in Benghazi by doing what the Obama administration did – they pointed to the Innocence of Muslims video. The video was being held up as an example of why it’s wrong to criticize anything Islam. We learned that before the attack, forces were already at work, plotting to call on international bodies as well as national governments to make any speech against or criticism of Islam a crime. At the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi called for restrictions on free speech.
The Obama administration pointed to the video as well. However, as the weeks have passed, a specific motive for doing so has been attributed to the administration. As the thinking goes, Obama and his team were using the video as an excuse so that the lack of security would not be exposed. It makes perfect sense. On October 19th, in a letter to Obama, Oversight Committee chairman Darrell Issa accused the administration of looking to “normalize” Libya despite an opposite reality on the ground. It’s become widely accepted that Obama, Hillary, et. al. wanted to use the video as a distraction and as an excuse.
This would necessarily mean that Islamists and the administration had adopted the same narrative but for different reasons.
Charles Woods, the father of Tyrone Woods, may have called that entire premise into question when he called in to the Lars Larson show on October 24th. In describing his visit with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton when the casket of his son and three other Americans arrived in at Andrews Air Force Base three days after their deaths.
Take note of what Charles says he was told by Hillary Clinton, beginning at the 6:15 mark (h/t Gather):
“We’re going to have that person arrested and prosecuted that did the video.”
I’ll explain why this is potentially so very important, after the clip
Charles Woods, Father of Former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods Who Gave His Life in Benghazi by TheLarsLarsonShow
If Hillary told Charles Woods that the filmmaker would be prosecuted, it meant that she was interested in criminalizing criticism of Islam as well. That would be a direct attack on the first amendment, which is something even the Obama administration is not yet willing to be seen as doing. Obama himself, in a PSA for Pakistan in which he appeared with Hillary, wouldn’t go that far publicly, saying there was “no justification for this senseless violence… none”. Again, Hillary accentuated the assertion that the “United States Government had absolutely nothing to do with this video” (I have always been intrigued by how adamantly she has stated that).
Read the rest HERE.
*******
I ask my fellow Americans - DO YOU SEE WHAT IT EXTREMELY WRONG ABOUT THIS PICTURE???
I recall the PUMA movement of 2008. All of the supporters of Hillary Clinton who HATED Barrack Hussein Obama and claimed that Obama "stole the election" from Hillary. I wonder...do they all see Hillary for who she really is??? Do they now, finally, understand that Hillary and Obama are one in the same radical liberal leftist socialist/communist/ Islamist/Sharia Law influenced BAD ACTORS FOR AMERICA????
When all is said and done, history will, one day, eventually reveal how DANGEROUS this TERRIBLE ADMINISTRATION has been to the United States of America!!!!
~ Christine
*******
EXPLOSIVE INFORMATION UPDATE!!!
SEAL father: Who denied military aid during Benghazi attack?
*The interview of Tyrone Woods father that was on Megyn Kelly's Fox News show a few minutes ago (@ 10:30 a.m. PT) was absolutely GRIPPING. * ** *You can find the video **HERE*
*Who is going to be held accountable????* ** *Father of former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods wants answers!* See these posts: CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack, Fox News, October 26, 2012, CIA operators told twice to “stand down” and not help ambassador’s team citizenwells at Citizen WElls - 1 hour ago CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack, Fox News, Octo... more »
Friday, September 14, 2012
Hillary Asks: How Could This Happen?
My blogging friend Steve over at Cry and Howl has a post up that is entitled, “How could this happen in a country we helped liberate, in a city we helped save from destruction?” That is what Hillary Clinton said during one of her public speaking events on television after the utterly tragic killings by Islamic jihad terrorists on the 11th anniversary of 9/11/01.
Excerpt:
Go over to Cry and Howl and read it all!
My comment there (may still be in moderation):
Your analysis is well stated, Steve. When Hillary came out and gave what I thought was a "heartfelt" speech regarding the terribly sad deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and four of his staff, I thought that she was honestly grieving over this latest terrorist attack. She even stated something like, "no movie could ever justify" such an attack. But later, she was filmed condemning the movie and blaming it for the attacks. What's wrong with this picture??
Her so-called bewilderment about “How could this happen in a country we helped liberate, in a city we helped save from destruction?” speaks volumes about the crazy minds of liberals who refuse to see Islam for what it is - an evil, conquering POLITICAL "faith" that hates Israel and America, and Christians and Jews across the globe. Their goal is total dominance so they can impose Sharia law across the world as they bow to their crescent moon god Allah and their pedophile, woman-beating/hating "prophet" Muhammad.
Now, a liberal may come along here and read your post and my comment; objecting profusely about the content. TOO BAD! I'm NOT standing down on this!
When I first saw that photo of the Islamic man holding that sign amidst an anti-Israel protest in San Francisco, it really puzzled me. I thought, why would anyone "give away" their true intentions with such a blatant and bizarre sign? It took a while for me to understand it.
When I learned of the Al Taquiya technique of feigning "friendship" to non-Muslims in order to gain their trust so that they could eventually destroy us, my opinion of the "moderate" Muslim ceased to exist.
There is a great blog called Answering Muslims that is the "everything you ever wanted to know about Islam, but were afraid to ask" type of blog. It has posts and videos that explain exactly why Islam is a dangerous, vile, hateful, murdering, political movement disguised as a faith in order to achieve dominance over Christians and Jews around the world. They would use ANYTHING to achieve their goals and cannot be trusted!
Liberals refuse to smell the violent Islamic jihad - even when it is right before their eyes!
Obambi's Muslim world apology tour, foreign policy of appeasement, and using excuses (like blaming Romney's much more presidential response!!) for the horrible results of the Arab Spring uprisings shows just how dangerous it is to have a pResident who sympathizes with Muslim terrorists and puts the lives of Americans here and abroad in grave danger each and every day.
Hat Tips:
Cry and Howl
Answering Muslims
Daniel Pipes
Excerpt:
Here we go again. Four more senseless deaths. Team Obama had warnings of the attack far ahead of time and did nothing. Not a word of it on any main news outlets. The media focuses on Romney’s just criticism of Barack Obama’s lame a$$ response. Liberals don’t have a word to say about it except I did read where one liberal said something like the United States received a “bloody nose” as a result of another humanitarian effort in Libya, then goes back to how great the massive, bankrupted social programs are. Four deaths … a “bloody nose”. My post the other day, Mitt Romney: “If you can’t beat Barack Obama with this record, then shut down the party”, drew out of the woodwork some liberals defending Obama, and their defense consisted only and solely of calling me and some of my regular readers ‘racists’. If you get the chance click on the link and check out the comments section.
After the murder of the four Americans can’t figure out whether Egypt is an ally. But he knows for sure Egypt is not an enemy, in spite of the murders. All we have from Obama is denial and speeches. Hillary Clinton is supposed to be in charge of the security for government officials serving abroad, feigned astonishment asking, “How could this happen in a country we helped liberate, in a city we helped save from destruction?”
Go over to Cry and Howl and read it all!
My comment there (may still be in moderation):
Your analysis is well stated, Steve. When Hillary came out and gave what I thought was a "heartfelt" speech regarding the terribly sad deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and four of his staff, I thought that she was honestly grieving over this latest terrorist attack. She even stated something like, "no movie could ever justify" such an attack. But later, she was filmed condemning the movie and blaming it for the attacks. What's wrong with this picture??
Her so-called bewilderment about “How could this happen in a country we helped liberate, in a city we helped save from destruction?” speaks volumes about the crazy minds of liberals who refuse to see Islam for what it is - an evil, conquering POLITICAL "faith" that hates Israel and America, and Christians and Jews across the globe. Their goal is total dominance so they can impose Sharia law across the world as they bow to their crescent moon god Allah and their pedophile, woman-beating/hating "prophet" Muhammad.
Now, a liberal may come along here and read your post and my comment; objecting profusely about the content. TOO BAD! I'm NOT standing down on this!
When I first saw that photo of the Islamic man holding that sign amidst an anti-Israel protest in San Francisco, it really puzzled me. I thought, why would anyone "give away" their true intentions with such a blatant and bizarre sign? It took a while for me to understand it.
When I learned of the Al Taquiya technique of feigning "friendship" to non-Muslims in order to gain their trust so that they could eventually destroy us, my opinion of the "moderate" Muslim ceased to exist.
There is a great blog called Answering Muslims that is the "everything you ever wanted to know about Islam, but were afraid to ask" type of blog. It has posts and videos that explain exactly why Islam is a dangerous, vile, hateful, murdering, political movement disguised as a faith in order to achieve dominance over Christians and Jews around the world. They would use ANYTHING to achieve their goals and cannot be trusted!
Liberals refuse to smell the violent Islamic jihad - even when it is right before their eyes!
Obambi's Muslim world apology tour, foreign policy of appeasement, and using excuses (like blaming Romney's much more presidential response!!) for the horrible results of the Arab Spring uprisings shows just how dangerous it is to have a pResident who sympathizes with Muslim terrorists and puts the lives of Americans here and abroad in grave danger each and every day.
Hat Tips:
Cry and Howl
Answering Muslims
Daniel Pipes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
