BHO Drone Policy: "Very Dangerous Stuff...Nowhere Justifiable Under Federal Law"

(Photo credit:  H/T Frank C. from Tea Party Community.)

Two topics today because I could not make a choice between them.

#1.  The BHO BADministration's leaked memo about the drone strikes on Americans. 

Fox News Channel has been all over this issue and rightly so!  This is an AWFUL violation of the U.S. Constitution and the rights of our citizens that are in the Declaration of Independence!!

What HUGE hypocrites BHO and his ilk are to have criticized former President George W. Bush for "enhanced interrogation techniques" against TERRORISTS; while supporting unmanned drone strikes on Americans who are "thought" (mind you, not arrested and tried before a jury of peers in a court of law) to be so-called "terrorists" (Now...who are they?  Opponents of the BADministration?  TEA Party Patriots?  Gun owners who hold to the Second Amendment rights? Conservatives expressing their First Amendment free speech rights and freedom of association and religion rights?)

If you are not ABSOLUTELY OUTRAGED by this, then you are not paying attention!


Please see these posts:

The Daily Caller

How drones and abortion both explain our ‘out-of-sight, out-mind’ psychology
 

 

*******

NoisyRoom.net

Judge Napolitano Tears Into Obama Drone Policy: ‘Very Dangerous Stuff … Nowhere Justifiable Under Federal Law’

 

*******

WH: Illegal Drone Killings are ‘Legal,’ ‘Ethical,’ ‘Wise’ Killer Obama: Judge, Jury, Executioner Obama Killed 3 Americans (1 Boy) Criminal Justice Dept Memo:Gov't Can Kill Americans

(Hat tip: Commieblaster)
If THIS blatant act - taking a dictator's tyrannical offense of outright killing of Americans - against the rule of law in the United States of America doesn't result in the impeachment of BHO, I don't know what it would take!!!!

*******

#2.  The second topic involves the Imam from the Ground Zero Mosque fiasco.  Please recall (and review) this original video that I had provided here back in 2010: Of Mosques and Men: Reflections of the Ground Zero Mosque

 

Now, see how this Imam misused funds collected for this Mosque:

Answering Muslims

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf Accused of Embezzling Millions from Mosque Fund

 

Excerpt:

 

 

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is the author of What's Right with Islam: A New Vision for Muslims and the West and the forthcoming Moving the Mountain: A New Vision of Islam in America. He is most famous for leading the Ground Zero Mosque campaign a few years back. And now he's about to be even more famous for how he handled the funds raised for the proposed mosque project.

I have to wonder, though, how Imam Rauf will be punished if he is found guilty. Will he be punished according to the Western legal system of the kufar, or will he demand to have his hand chopped off in accordance with Qur'an 5:38:

As for the thief, both male and female, cut off their hands. It is the reward of their own deeds, an exemplary punishment from Allah. Allah is Mighty, Wise.

 

I say that any Muslim who doesn't choose to be punished according to Sharia has forfeited the right to tell us about Islam.

 NEW YORK, Feb 5 (Reuters) - The head of a proposed mosque that was to be built near the site of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks in New York City was sued on Tuesday and accused of squandering millions of dollars in donations on lavish lifestyle perks for himself and his wife.

Continue reading:

Answering Muslims

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf Accused of Embezzling Millions from Mosque Fund

 

I refuse to put the face of the Muslim radical thief on my blog.

Hat tips to all links.

*******

Update:

More articles to read on this:

Fox News.com: NYC lawsuit: Former imam of mosque planned near ground zero misused donations to his charity.

Fox News.com: Donor claims ex-imam in NYC mosque debate misused gifts.

Voter Fraud Part 2 - Fool Me Twice [Update 3, 4 and 5 - MUST SEE VIDEO and More On Scytl!!]

The fact that Democrats used dirty voter fraud tricks to steal the election for BHO should not surprise anyone who has been paying attention over the past 5 years.  This post will contain some indisputable facts that voter fraud, military voter suppression, vote machine irregularities and outright cheating at voting precincts helped get the worst pResident ever illegally re-elected.  I will also share some information that might be considered speculative.  Those portions will be the "Talk Wisdom Reports - You Decide" links and excerpts.  But let's start with one of the most obvious facts that should make most readers sit up and take notice of what a sham this election has been because of Democrat cheating.

~  Christine

*******

UPDATE # 4 ON SCYTL:



Lame Cherry Blog: SCYTL

*******

UPDATE # 3:  BEFORE YOU DO ANYTHING ELSE, PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING VIDEO AT THE LINK:



AGENDA DOCUMENTARY

[Note:  you may need to scroll over to the right to see the video.  Click on the "trailer" and then after viewing that, you can click on "Agenda:  Grinding America Down (Full Movie)].
Hat tip:

CultureWatch

The Agenda - An agenda is different from a conspiracy. A conspiracy involves secret plans to achieve some harmful end, while an agenda is simply a list of things meant ...

*******

Before I get to the articles, I wanted to mention what a person who worked a precinct in Palm Beach Florida said about outright cheating going on during a phone call into the Glenn Beck radio program today.  The man said that he saw a small group of Democrats marking what appeared to be military ballots over in a corner of the precinct, without anyone from the Republican party supervising them.  When he tried to go over to see what they were doing they brushed off his inquisition with some lie.  But he knows what he saw!  Perhaps The Blaze has some more information up about this incident today.

The first article I want to share was just published about one hour ago (@ 5:50 p.m. PT). It was written by Aaron Klein, author of a new book called "Fool Me Twice." Wish more of the clueless BHO voters read that book! Anyway, Klein's article is entitled Did This Dirty Trick Get Obama Elected? President didn’t win a single state that required Voter ID .

Excerpt:

Did the suppression or lack of voter ID laws aid President Obama’s victory over Mitt Romney?

Obama did not win a single state that requires photo IDs to vote, although he was victorious in four states that require non-photo identification – Washington, Colorado, Ohio and Virginia. Those states accept as legitimate identification current utility bills, bank statements and paychecks.

Obama won several closely contested states that do not require any voter identification, including Minnesota, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Iowa, Wisconsin and Nevada.

The states that Obama lost that do require photo identification do not traditionally vote Republican. Tennessee, for example, voted Democrat in the 1972, 1992 and 1996 presidential elections. Georgia, which also requires photo ID, voted Democrat in the 1976, 1980 and 1992 presidential elections.

In Colorado, where non-photo identification is accepted, a review by RedState.com showed irregular voting patterns, finding that 10 counties had a total registration ranging between 104 to 140 percent of the respective populations.

When Media Trackers requested comment on the voter bloat in one area, Gilpin County, the county’s chief deputy Gail Maxwell explained, “This is just a reminder Gilpin is a Gaming Community. The voters come and go!”

RedState notes records show some of the counties in question maintained statistically unusual voting figures. Gilpin County had a 61 percent voter turnout in the 2010 election, and Hinsdale County had an astounding 92 percent voter turnout. Those figures are far above the Colorado average turnout of 48 percent and the national average of 41 percent.

In Pennsylvania, where Obama was victorious, an Oct. 2 ruling by a Pennsylvania judge put a voter ID law on hold, decreeing that election officials can still ask voters for photo identification but cannot require it.

Voter ID laws were entirely struck down in Texas and South Carolina. Romney carried both states.

WND previously reported a radical group that has a history of biased research provided data utilized in both cases that blocked the new voter ID laws.

The Brennan Center for Justice, heavily funded by billionaire activist George Soros, has been at the center of providing data claiming voter ID laws will disenfranchise minorities.

However, WND reported the very voter ID data used by Brennan has been called into question by experts and has been contradicted by other credible studies and even by the group’s own footnotes in the one study it conducted.

Read it all HERE.

Remember that name - George Soros - because there is more information that will show his interference in the election and what this billionaire did to help BHO steal it.

Need to see more proof how voter ID laws help prevent fraud and more proof that states with voter ID laws were won by Mitt Romney?


See: The Steady Drip Blog: Voter ID and IQ Test - What does This Map Tell You?


The next article of truth is most disturbing!!  I originally found it on another blog, but the link didn't work today.  Then, a commenter posted the link in the comment section.  When I originally clicked on it, I got the usual "Internet explorer cannot open this page....blah blah blah."  But when I tried a second and third time, I was able to connect.  Strange...isn't it?  Since this article seems to be a target of hackers, I will post the link and then copy and paste the entire post here at Talk Wisdom.


The Duffel Blog: Military Absentee Ballots Delivered One Day Late, Would Have Swung Election For Romney

[Update:  It has come to my attention that "The Duffel Blog" is a satire site so I have removed the copy of the post.]

 

Coincidence?  I think not!  Sounds more like something that was done "by accident on purpose" perhaps?  Nope...not even that explains it.  It was definitely done by design.

OK - as if THAT isn't enough to get your blood boiling over the THEFT of this election, we all know how complicit the media of mass deception has been in the cover-up over the Benghazi terrorist attack where four Americans were murdered in cold blood.  But has anyone heard of the following additional scandal?

Impeach Obama Campaign

Obama Administration Facing Massive Federal Lawsuit - A lawsuit seeking the return of $43 trillion (with a “t”) and an audit of all the TARP programs by an independent receiver has been filed against senior me...

 

 

I wrote about this additional scandal back in October:

 

 

Talk Wisdom: CNBC Reports $43 Trillion Bankster Lawsuit…CNBC Exec’s Children Murdered Next Day.  We can see how absolutely RUTHLESS these people are - to kill the children of an CNBC executive because they published a story about the lawsuit?  Bone-chillingly evil, disgusting and UGLY!

So...one might ask what kind of people would do such awful things?  Well, one lone (and, admittedly,  kinda quirky) blogger is often credited with coming out with explanations well before most blogging journalists.  But you will need to realize that this is a "Talk Wisdom Reports...You Decide" kind of link to a post.

Apparently, the author does not like bloggers "stealing" the material and re-posting it.  Therefore, here is a list of links.  It might be best to read them in order so that you will understand what is being revealed:

1. Lame Cherry Blog: No Title Necessary For Vote Fraud

2. Lame Cherry Blog: Obama Scytlgate

3. Lame Cherry Blog: Election Theft Thread
 
(Apparently, people needed more clarification regarding what the author was talking about in the previous post. The author often "scolds" readers for being anywhere from a bit slow to catch on all the way to being totally dumb. Like I said, the author is kinda quirky...)

You will notice some unflattering verbiage over there regarding Karl Rove's sexual preferences.  But that's the way this author is.  There is a lot of satire (or, perhaps secret truths?) going on in the author's posts.  Humor mixed with astonishing facts, as well.  I'm not even sure whether the author is male or female.  Claims to be a woman, but what women has loads of photos of sexy young scantily-clad women in her posts?  It may be an attempt to disguise the identity over there...who knows?

Anyway, this is not the first time I have heard of the Scytlgate machines owned by billionaire George Soros swinging elections in the favor of leftist lunatic communists.

Something else to consider.  Recall when BHO was discovered on an open mic telling Medvedev of Russia that "this is my last election.  I will have more flexibility after the election."  Then, Medvedev replies, "I will transmit this to Vladimir [Putin]."  One must wonder - did BHO say such a thing because he knew "the fix was in?"  And, why did BHO have all those people at his re-election victory party - all lined up waving their little American flags - waiting for hours for The One to come out and give his speech?  It was obviously staged.  Funny how the flags were so small...kinda like how BHO and his ilk think of America.  With another four years to wreak havoc upon our beloved nation, perhaps this once huge and exceptional country will be battered down to the size that they desire - like a third world country - with "the communist little dictator" in place until 2016...or perhaps beyond?

Hmmm...could it be that Lame Cherry's cynicism is rubbing off on me?

Well, that's it for now.  Perhaps I will have more links to share tomorrow.

Hat tips to all links.

*******

Update!

 Daily Thought Pad has the military absentee ballot story and also included these related links:

More Electronic Voting Machines Changing Romney Votes to Obama: We Looked Into It and Here’s What a Vendor Told Us – Updated

Have You Heard About ‘Spigot Cities’ That May Pump Votes to Obama?

More from "Ask Marion."

WHAT is Scytl & WHY Should You Be VERY, VERY Concerned?

You Might Have Already Voted – Voting Integrity and Snopes cover-Up (Part 2)

Dead Dogs Voting for Obama

Easy Things You Can Do to Prevent Voter Fraud

Bias in new vote-counting system? National security concerns also raised

Voter Fraud – Hacking Democracy

Voter Fraud… Becoming an Increasing Problem in the US!! – Updated

URGENT: Let the Vote Rigging Begin! – Voter Machine Glitch or All Out Fraud? – Updated

The Reality of 2012 Voter Turnout: The White Voter

How Does Team Obama Plan to Steal Election 2012… And What Will You Do to Help Stop It?

Stealing Election 2012

A Victory for Republicans, Florida Wins Use of Federal Database to Purge Voters

STEAL THE VOTE: Election Day fraud found all over U.S.

Texas Has 12 Counties With More Registered Voters Than Voting Age Citizens

How to Lock Democrats in Power – Stop Universal Voter Registration!!

Universal Voter Registration

EXPOSED: Reuters/IPSOS Poll Over-Samples Dems by 13% – and LIES about Percentage!

Vote Counting ‘Nightmare’ Looms in Ohio

Cast Your Vote for Romney, Obama Early!

The Chart That Will Cost Obama the Election

“It’s not who votes that counts, it’s who counts the votes”

 

*******

Update on November 9, 2012:

Lame Cherry Blog - Boxgate: Obamas Election Theft Propaganda

People are sensing that something was very wrong with this election.  However, many of them apparently haven't a clue about Scytl, Sequoia and SOE, the Big Three S's. 

How unfortunate it is that the pundits at Fox News are buying the Demoncrap narrative (and believing it - for Pete's sake!!) that Republicans need to change in order to appeal to minorities.  How do we know that minority votes weren't stolen via the Big Three S's machine voter fraud to tilt the election towards BHO?

Recall how Demoncraps complained for EIGHT YEARS - and more (i.e. throughout BHO'S first term of thievery) that the election was rigged against Gore so that Bush won??  But now, when the PROOF if right before there very eyes, they accept voter fraud because they happen to like and agree with the thief and his ilk?

I'm starting to think that my suspicion that the last true election really was Ronald Reagan's.  The thievery began after that.

More from Commie Blaster:

Obama's Stolen Election: 10 Very Dire Consequences Intentional: Military Not Represented in Vote

Election Results Came From Same People Who Gave You Fake Birth Certificates Obama Stole Election No Voter ID Cost Election: Obama Won No State that Required Photo ID Raw Voter Fraud in PA: Obama Got Over 99% of Vote at Polls Where GOP Inspectors were Kicked Out The Case of the Missing White Voters ...Missing is Right! Missing from the Vote Count! *******

Update # 2:

Media Trackers: Colorado Counties Have More Voters Than People

*******

UPDATE 11/12/12!

Newsbusters.org: BREAKING: Romney Got ZERO Votes in 59 Philadelphia Voting Divisions! Zero!

Anonymous Letter Re: Mojave Cross Theft

I have already expressed my opinion and disgust about the thief (or thieves) of the Mojave cross theft in this post. If this anonymous writer thinks he/she/they will get away with this, they are in for a BIG surprise. He/she/they will be CAUGHT AND PROSECUTED! There are so many points to refute in the anonymous letter, but I am too weary to deal with it tonight. Feel free to share your thoughts about this terrible incident in the comment section.

Christine

P.S. The Bible explains why this (these) criminal(s) did what he/she/they did:


1Cr 1:18
For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.



*******

Anonymous letter explaining cross theft sent to Desert Dispatch.

Copy of article:


May 11, 2010 5:27 PM
From Staff Reports
BARSTOW • An anonymous caller, claiming to know the details of the theft of the Mojave Cross, contacted the Desert Dispatch newsroom at around 4 p.m. Tuesday. He said he was not directly responsible for the cross’s theft, but knew who was. He told a reporter that the person responsible for the theft wrote up the following explanation and statement regarding the removal of the cross. He asked that the Desert Dispatch to print the statement in its entirety.

We make no claims to the validity of the origins of this statement. We concluded, however, that the short time between the reporting of the cross’s theft and the receipt of this lengthy statement signified at least a strong connection. We are passing along this information in the hopes of illuminating what might have happened:



"1. The cross in question was not vandalized. It was simply moved. This was done lovingly and with great care.

2. The cross has been carefully preserved. It has not been destroyed as many have assumed.

3. I am a Veteran.

4. A small non-sectarian monument was brought to place at the site but technical difficulties prevented this from happening at the time the cross was moved to its new location.

5. The cross was erected illegally on public land in 1998 by a private individual named Henry Sandoz. Since then the government has actively worked to promote the continued existence of the cross, even as it excluded other monuments from differing religions. This favoritism and exclusion clearly violates the establishment clause of the US Constitution.

6. Anthony Kennedy desecrated and marginalized the memory and sacrifice of all those non-Christians that died in WWI when he wrote: 'Here one Latin cross in the desert evokes far more than religion. It evokes thousands of small crosses in foreign fields marking the graves of Americans who fell in battles — battles whose tragedies are compounded if the fallen are forgotten.' The irony and tragedy of that statement is unique.

7. Justice Kennedy’s words in particular and others like them from the other Justices caused me to act.

8. At the time of its removal there was nothing to identify the cross as a memorial of any kind, and the simple fact of the matter is that the only thing it represented was an oddly placed tribute to Christ. This cross evoked nothing of the sort that Justice Kennedy writes of, it was in the end simply a cross in the desert.

9. Discrimination in any form is intolerable, as is hatred.

10. Discrimination or hatred based upon religion should be despised by all Americans, and offering that this event was caused by hatred or malice is simply ignorance of the actual intent.

11. Despite what many people are saying, this act was definitively not anti-Christian. It was instead anti-discrimination. If this act was anti-Christian, the cross would not have been cared for so reverently. An anti-Christian response would have been to simply destroy the cross and leave the pieces in the desert.

12. We as a nation need to change the dialogue and stop pretending that this is about a war memorial. If it is a memorial, then we need to stop arguing about the cross and instead place a proper memorial on that site, one that respects Christians and non-Christians alike, and one that is actually recognizable as a war memorial.

13. If an appropriate and permanent non-sectarian memorial is placed at the site the cross will be immediately returned to Mr. Sandoz.

14. Alternatively, if a place can be found that memorializes the Christian Veterans of WWI that is not on public land the Cross will promptly be forwarded with care and reverence for installation at the private site.

15. In short this has happened because as Abraham Lincoln said: 'To stand in silence when they should be protesting makes cowards out of men.' Perhaps this was an inappropriate form of protest if so I humbly request your forgiveness and understanding for the actions that I have taken here."

*******

There are 51 comments. Here are some of the best:

exchequerofnance wrote:
Better to ask forgiveness than permission. You forgot a couple of things.
1. It's a crime;
2. The Supreme Court is the arbiter, not you;
3. You are a citizen, and therefore are consenting to be governed by the laws of this land;
4. You may hide the cross, but the message cannot be hidden, and as Billy Graham wisely pointed out from the Bible -- Be sure your sins will find you out.

The Tax Man Cometh

5/13/2010 8:12 PM PDT on DesertDispatch.com

*******

carpetjohn3 wrote:
Don't think I would want to be this guy who cut it down as $25,000.00 would go along way for a person who might live out in the desert.

With over 9 million who had died in WW1 and all the vets who live out there I don't think that I would want to be this person when they find him, and they will find this person and anyone else who might be involved in this as you just have to know that when they get one of them they will turn in the others to get out of jail time...

If it were me I would think about making a deal now before there is a nock on the door and its to late to do it then...

Now there is the question of crosses along the side of the road of people who have died out in the desert is this low life going to go around and take them down also???

They are going to get you guys so you better watch your backs......
5/13/2010 7:18 PM PDT

*******

matt85 wrote:
So the rule of law doesn't apply to these thieves? The cross stood for years and those who demand it remain and be displayed - and who have WON in the courts - have waited patiently. Within weeks of a final decision by our courts that it was a reasonable to display it, those who don't agree have stolen it. If you don't understand the horrible irony of this mentality then you too are a liberal, a socialist or worse.

*******
wolf73b wrote:
So, if this schmuck gets to violate the law, simply because he disagrees with it, why do we have laws? Can a bar owner allow smoking in his bar, because he disagrees with that law? Do I get to speed, because I disagree with that law? How about stealing? Can I walk into Vons and take what I want?
5/12/2010 9:34 AM PDT

*******

barstowcob wrote:
All I see is an attempt to justify hatred of Christians and disrespect of veterans.
5/11/2010 10:02 PM PDT on DesertDispatch.com

*******

longtimeago wrote:
This self centered whack job "lovingly" spit in the face of veterans and families all over the country. This isn't about "a tribute to Christ". This was a memorial erected by people who wanted to remember fallen friends. Is this loon now going to go "lovingly" gather up all the crosses on the side of highways across America? Why can't people leave stuff alone? Anti discrimination my a&&. This discriminats against Veterans and the friends that wanted to remember the fallen.
5/12/2010 6:09 AM PDT

*******
Hat Tip:

Desert Dispatch.com