The Hidden Agenda of the Zimmerman Arrest

The following link is to a very long article, but it is well worth reading in order to understand what was actually going on behind the scenes (and either oblivious to the media or they were ordered not to share any investigative material about it all) during the entire Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman fiasco.

The Conservative Treehouse.com: A Nation of George Zimmermans Awakened – Understand The Fraud – Post Verdict of Acquittal ….


I learned A LOT that I wasn't previously aware of from that post! However, I DO recall hearing this statement:

“We are not asking that he [Zimmerman] be convicted; We are asking that he be arrested.”

-Benjamin Crump Esq. Attorney for Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fuller (Quoted to Piers Morgan on 4/3/2012)


*******

The moment that I heard that statement (which was quoted over a year ago) I thought that it was a very odd one!   Does it sound like a strange comment to you, too?

The article continues:

And there you have it, the ulterior motive, the hidden agenda:

 

MONEY !

The Trayvon family is not seeking justice in the form you would think. No, they are seeking monetary justice, or more directly monetary gain. THAT is the motivation; and the absence of an “arrest” is what stands between them and their ability to sue in civil court”.

Ohio School Forced To Take Down Portrait of Jesus

Have you heard about the Ohio school that was forced to take down a portrait of Jesus (that had been up for 66 years) because the school does not have the money to pay for the cost of the lawsuit put against the school?

Watch the video:

Fox News.com: Ohio school takes down Jesus portrait under legal threat Move to avoid pricey lawsuit over constitutionality of painting.

What was surprising to me (regarding the man in the above video link who was speaking against the portrait of Jesus being hung in the school) was his comment referring to Jesus as, "the Man who created hell on the rest of the world."

Huh????

Either this guy is afraid of going to hell - and deems it a real place, or he is using a subject that he doesn't, supposedly, "believe in" as a non sequitur in order to try and make his point about removal of the portrait.

What this man who is contesting the portrait of Jesus in the school doesn't realize is, no matter what his personal beliefs are about the matter, the Bible explicitly tells us that we have demonic enemies.  Rejecting Christ is the way that leads to hell - a destination that the man on the video obviously fears in his own life.

Hell was originally created for Satan and his demons.  However, those who reject God's only provision for eternal life - Jesus Christ (HE IS THE WAY, THE TRUTH , AND THE LIFE!!) - only have themselves to blame.  They will appear before God with the penalty due for their own sins on their souls.

Jesus saves!!  Christian believers will appear before the Judgment Seat of Christ where they will have the fact of the blood of "the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world" as forgiveness for all sin and the right to be a child of God; living eternally with Him!

Satan seeks to destroy us, and his demonic hosts are more dangerous than we may realize.  The Bible says, "We are not fighting against flesh-and-blood enemies, but against evil rulers and authorities of the unseen world, against mighty powers in this dark world, and against evil spirits in the heavenly places" (Ephesians 6:12, NLT)

What this man doesn't realize is that Jesus' death at the cross of Calvary, His Resurrection to life, and His Ascension to the Father in Heaven all represent that for the Christian believer, our foes have already lost the fight.  In the book of Hebrews, we read that by His own death Jesus defeated him who held the power of the death; that is the devil.  In Revelation 12:10, we read that the saints in the last days overcame their foes by the blood of the Lamb and the word of their testimony.  The Bible says of Christ, "He must reign till He has put all enemies under His feet" (see 1 Corinthians 15:25).

This man, being a non-believer is on his own, helpless and defenseless.  We all would be if not for Jesus!  Jesus keeps us safe - no matter what happens on this earth - for all eternity!  That's the real point of Jesus' ministry and the Gospel story here on this earth! 

I'm sure that every reader here could site many times where Jesus prevented bad things from happening to them.  I know I can!  We all have NO IDEA how many times we've been protected and delivered by His providential hand of protection.  Other times, He allows certain things to happen, but in His own way, He always delivers us from them - even through "the valley of the shadow of death" as we physically die but our soul and spirit goes on to live eternally with Christ until we are reunited with new resurrected bodies at the moment of the Rapture.

John 10:27-29 is one of the best verses to inform us of the eternal protection afforded to us through Christ when we repent and believe in Him.

"My sheep listen to My voice; I know them and they follow Me.  I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one can snatch them out of My hand.  My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of My Father's hand."

What does this mean?  It means that the Lord Jesus is able to provide for us and to protect us throughout life and eternity.

The lawsuit hasn't yet run it's course.  The portrait was taken down due to a temporary restraining order.  The case is scheduled for another hearing next week.  However, no matter what the final verdict will be in this particular case, reprobate men like the man on the video at Fox News. com who was part of the lawsuit to get the school to comply with an order to get the 66-year-old  STUDENT PLACED tradition of Jesus' portrait removed from the school may think he has won in this life; but he will regret it one day when he will inevitably come face to face with Jesus (whom he has rejected) at the Great White Throne judgment.

Hat tips:

Fox News.com

WND: 'Gate to hell' discovered in Antichrist's neighborhood

CNBC Reports $43 Trillion Bankster Lawsuit…CNBC Exec’s Children Murdered Next Day [Update]

When I first heard about the awful and devastating story of a nanny stabbing two children to death in the bathtub of their home while the mom took another child to swim lessons, the story was horrific enough.  But if the following connections are true, it shows to what lengths such evil people will go to steal American taxpayer money and kill to squelch the story of a lawsuit against them and cover up their evil deeds.

Talk Wisdom Reports - You Decide

Before It Is News: CNBC Reports $43 Trillion Bankster Lawsuit…CNBC Exec’s Children Murdered Next Day

Copy:

New York (CNN) — A Manhattan mother returned home early Thursday evening to find two of her young children stabbed to death in a bathtub, as their nanny lay bleeding nearby, police said.

NEW: The father is a CNBC executive, officials familiar with the investigation say.
The mother, 38, had just returned around 5:30 p.m. to the family apartment on Manhattan’s West Side with her 3-year-old daughter, who she had just taken to swimming lessons, police Commissioner Ray Kelly said.
All the lights were out in the residence, so she went downstairs to ask the doorman whether her two other children and their nanny had gone outside. After the doorman said they had not, the mother went back upstairs and started looking around, Kelly said.
Peering into a bathroom, she let out a scream upon finding her 1-year-old son and 6-year-old daughter stabbed to death in the bathtub, according to Kelly.
The children’s 50-year-old nanny was on the bathroom floor unconscious and bleeding from what appeared to be self-inflicted stab wounds to her neck, Kelly said. A kitchen knife sat next to her, according to police spokesman Paul Browne.
A neighbor, Sandy Marcus, told CNN that she called 911 after hearing the mother’s screams. Another neighbor recalled it was hard to ascertain what was going on since “everybody was screaming.”
The children were taken to Roosevelt Hospital and pronounced dead.
The father of the children is Kevin Krim, an executive with CNBC , several officials familiar with the investigation said.
The nanny is at St. Luke’s Hospital, also in New York, in critical but stable condition, according to Kelly. No charges have been filed yet in the case, he added.
Klein described the family at the center of the horror as “all-American” and “lovely.”
“It’s like something you read about in the papers, in some distant country, but never on your floor,” she said.
cnn.com/2012/10/25/us/new-york-nanny-deaths/
This story about the lawsuit broke Thursday at CNBC. Here is the saved page.






Click for larger image

[Update:  the link for larger image doesn't seem to be working.  My apologies for the inconvenience.]

Now following the original CNBC link takes you to a blank page, even though some of the comments on that original article remain (UPDATE: comments have been erased as well).
Here the story takes a dark turn! It turns out that Kevin Krim, the father of the two children stabbed to death, allegedly by the Nanny, is SVP and General Manager, CNBC Digital! And shortly after the murder of the children, CNBC pulled down the story regarding the lawsuit against the banks!
How long will the story remain at Marketwatch before it is “Orwellized?”
Are the children of the executives at Marketwatch even now in danger?
As a side note, the official story regarding the murders is that the nanny stabbed the children, then tried to slash her own throat. Suicide by cutting ones own throat is extremely rare, less than one percent of all suicides, and is primarily committed by men with military experience. Women committing suicide by slashing their own throat is almost unheard of!
While the corporate-owned media is proclaiming the “rush to judgement” guilt of the nanny (who has survived but cannot yet speak) she has not actually been charged yet, nor is there any apparent motive for the nanny to have done such a thing. whatreallyhappened.com/node/197971

Oct 27, 2012 by LoveTehSun
858-page court case 1:12-cv-04269-JBW-RML document, filed 8/24/12:img41.imageshack.us/img41/5857/usaracketeeringonmortga.pdf
Orignal CNBC link: cnbc.com/id/49555671
Original CNBC article:whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/CNBCvanishedarticleSpire.jpg
2nd article: news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/10/26/police-nanny-accused-in-kids-deaths-stab…
“In connection with the federal lawsuit now impending in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, New York (Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML) – involving, among other things, a request that the District Court enjoin all mortgage foreclosures by the Banksters nationwide, unless and until the entire $43 trillion is repaid to a court-appointed receiver – Plaintiffs now establish the location of the $43 trillion of laundered money in a racketeering enterprise participated in by the following individuals: Attorney General Holder, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris, Jon Corzine, Robert Rubin, Timothy Geitner, Vikram Pandit, Valerie Jarrett, Anita Dunn, Robert Bauer, as well as the “Banksters” themselves, and their affiliates and conduits.”

*******

Hat tips to all links and Commieblaster where I first located story.

I could not bring video/audio report over here, so go to the link to view and listen.

Coincidence???

IF THIS CONNECTION IS TRUE I'M ABSOLUTELY HORRIFIED!!!


Praying for this devastated family.  How grief stricken they must all be.  May they be comforted by the eternal promises of Jesus Christ and know that their beloved children are now in eternity with Him.

*******

Update:

Marketwatch.com: Major Banks, Governmental Officials and Their Comrade Capitalists Targets of Spire Law Group, LLP's Racketeering and Money Laundering Lawsuit Seeking Return of $43 Trillion to the United States Treasury Copy of article [because these articles tend to be scrubbed when found by liberal leftists who want to hide the truth!]

NEW YORK, Oct. 25, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Spire Law Group, LLP's national home owners' lawsuit, pending in the venue where the "Banksters" control their $43 trillion racketeering scheme (New York) - known as the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History and identifying $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money by the "Banksters" and their U.S. racketeering partners and joint venturers - now pinpoints the identities of the key racketeering partners of the "Banksters" located in the highest offices of government and acting for their own self-interests.

In connection with the federal lawsuit now impending in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, New York (Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML) - involving, among other things, a request that the District Court enjoin all mortgage foreclosures by the Banksters nationwide, unless and until the entire $43 trillion is repaid to a court-appointed receiver - Plaintiffs now establish the location of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money in a racketeering enterprise participated in by the following individuals (without limitation): Attorney General Holder acting in his individual capacity, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris (both acting in their individual capacities), Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary (acting in his individual capacity), Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former "communications director" for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign), as well as the "Banksters" themselves, and their affiliates and conduits. The lawsuit alleges serial violations of the United States Patriot Act, the Policy of Embargo Against Iran and Countries Hostile to the Foreign Policy of the United States, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly known as the RICO statute) and other State and Federal laws.

In the District Court lawsuit, Spire Law Group, LLP -- on behalf of home owner across the Country and New York taxpayers, as well as under other taxpayer recompense laws -- has expanded its mass tort action into federal court in Brooklyn, New York, seeking to halt all foreclosures nationwide pending the return of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000.00) by the "Banksters" and their co-conspirators, seeking an audit of the Fed and audits of all the "bailout programs" by an independent receiver such as Neil Barofsky, former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other "bailout money" advanced from the Treasury has ever been repaid despite protestations to the contrary by the Defendants as well as similar protestations by President Obama and the Obama Administration both publicly on national television and more privately to the United States Congress. Because the Obama Administration has failed to pursue any of the "Banksters" criminally, and indeed is actively borrowing monies for Mr. Obama's campaign from these same "Banksters" to finance its political aspirations, the national group of plaintiff home owners has been forced to now expand its lawsuit to include racketeering, money laundering and intentional violations of the Iranian Nations Sanctions and Embargo Act by the national banks included among the "Bankster" Defendants.

The complaint - which has now been fully served on thousands of the "Banksters and their Co-Conspirators" - makes it irrefutable that the epicenter of this laundering and racketeering enterprise has been and continues to be Wall Street and continues to involve the very "Banksters" located there who have repeatedly asked in the past to be "bailed out" and to be "bailed out" in the future.

The Havens for the money laundering schemes - and certain of the names and places of these entities - are located in such venues as Switzerland, the Isle of Man, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Cypress and entities controlled by governments adverse to the interests of the United States Sanctions and Embargo Act against Iran, and are also identified in both the United Nations and the U.S. Senate's recent reports on international money laundering. Many of these entities have already been personally served with summons and process of the complaint during the last six months. It is now beyond dispute that, while the Obama Administration was publicly encouraging loan modifications for home owners by "Banksters", it was privately ratifying the formation of these shell companies in violation of the United States Patriot Act, and State and Federal law. The case further alleges that through these obscure foreign companies, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo Bank, Citibank, Citigroup, One West Bank, and numerous other federally chartered banks stole trillions of dollars of home owners' and taxpayers' money during the last decade and then laundered it through offshore companies.

This District Court Complaint - maintained by Spire Law Group, LLP -- is the only lawsuit in the world listing as Defendants the Banksters, let alone serving all of such Banksters with legal process and therefore forcing them to finally answer the charges in court. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, nor the Office of the Attorney General, nor any State Attorney General has sued the Banksters and thereby legally chased them worldwide to recover-back the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) and other lawful damages, injunctive relief and other legal remedies.

James N. Fiedler, Managing Partner of Spire Law Group, LLP, stated: "It is hard for me to believe as a 47-year lawyer that our nation's guardians have been unwilling to stop this theft. Spire Law Group, LLP stands for the elimination of corruption and implementation of lawful strategies, and that is what we're doing here. Spire Law Group, LLP's charter is to not allow such corruption to go unanswered."

Comments were requested from the Attorney Generals' offices in NY, CA, NV, NH , OH, MA and the White House, but no comment was provided.

About Spire Law Group

Spire Law Group, LLP is a national law firm whose motto is "the public should be protected -- at all costs -- from corruption in whatever form it presents itself." The Firm is comprised of lawyers nationally with more than 250-years of experience in a span of matters ranging from representing large corporations and wealthy individuals, to also representing the masses. The Firm is at the front lines litigating against government officials, banks, defunct loan pools, and now the very offshore entities where the corruption was enabled and perpetrated.

Contact: James N. Fiedler877-438-8766 http://spire-law.com

SOURCE Spire Law Group, LLP

Copyright (C) 2012 PR Newswire. All rights reserved

Harassed by American Community Survey People?

If you are one of the unfortunate citizens of the United States of America who are currently being harassed by an American Community Survey person for refusing to participate in the survey, I have done some research on it. I am providing what I have found here, hoping that it will assist anyone who is interested in legally refusing to participate in the survey. [Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer and cannot vouch for the 100% accuracy of what is written. However, it made sense to me and I am using this information for refusal to participate in the survey if the harassment continues.]

When you type American Community Survey - Just Say No into Bing, you get two really good blogs to peruse.

The best one is this one:

Truth Is Treason.Net - How to legally refuse to participate in the census survey

Another one to check out is this:

No To ACS Blog

Near the end of the post at the first link (Truth is Treason.net) there is a letter that you can print out and send (along with your blank survey if you still have it) which will legally allow you to refuse to participate in the survey. Here is a copy:

To Whom it May Concern,

Pursuant to Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution, the only information you are empowered to request is the total number of occupants at this address. My “name, sex, age, date of birth, race, ethnicity, telephone number, relationship and housing tenure” have absolutely nothing to do with apportioning direct taxes or determining the number of representatives in the House of Representatives. Therefore, neither Congress nor the Census Bureau have the constitutional authority to make that information request a component of the enumeration outlined in Article I, Section 2, Clause 3. In addition, I cannot be subject to a fine for basing my conduct on the Constitution because that document trumps laws passed by Congress.

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brimson, 154 U.S. 447, 479 (May 26, 1894)

“Neither branch of the legislative department [House of Representatives or Senate], still less any merely administrative body [such as the Census Bureau], established by congress, possesses, or can be invested with, a general power of making inquiry into the private affairs of the citizen. Kilbourn v. Thompson, 103 U.S. 168, 190. We said in Boyd v. U.S., 116 U. S. 616, 630, 6 Sup. Ct. 524,―and it cannot be too often repeated,―that the principles that embody the essence of constitutional liberty and security forbid all invasions on the part of government and it’s employees of the sanctity of a man’s home and the privacies of his life. As said by Mr. Justice Field in Re Pacific Ry. Commission, 32 Fed. 241, 250, ‘of all the rights of the citizen, few are of greater importance or more essential to his peace and happiness than the right of personal security, and that involves, not merely protection of his person from assault, but exemption of his private affairs, books, and papers from inspection and scrutiny of others. Without the enjoyment of this right, all others would lose half their value.’”

Note: This United States Supreme Court case has never been overturned.

Respectfully,

A Citizen of the United States of America

You might want to read through the entire post at the link above, but here is the pertinent information as it applies to the American Community Survey:

The American Community Survey

As stated above, the Census Bureau will be using the American Community Survey to extract personal data that it previously received on the old long form. Once again, this information will have absolutely nothing to with apportioning direct taxes or determining the number of representatives in the House of Representatives.

Authority for the Census and the American Community Survey

On their web-site, the Census Bureau claims the American people are “required by law” to provide the information requested on either form and our response is “mandatory.”

For the Census, they cite the provision of the Constitution referenced above as their authority to request the information.

For the American Community Survey, they cite Title 13, United States Code (U.S.C.), Sections 141 and 193 as their authority to request the information.

Section 141 (d) states, in part: …the Secretary, in the year 1985 and every 10 years thereafter, shall conduct a mid-decade census of population in such form and content as he may determine…

Section 141 (e) (2) states: Information obtained in any mid-decade census shall not be used for apportionment of Representatives in Congress among the several States, nor shall such information be used in prescribing congressional districts.

Section 141 (g) As used in this section, “census of population” means a census of population, housing, and matters relating to population and housing.

Section 193 states: In advance of, in conjunction with, or after the taking of each census provided for by this chapter, the Secretary may make surveys and collect such preliminary and supplementary statistics related to the main topic of the census as are necessary to the initiation, taking, or completion thereof.

The first thing reader should note is the difference between the statement of authority for the 2 surveys. The Census falls under the Constitution while the American Community Survey is merely based on a statute passed by Congress.

The second thing the reader should note concerning section 141 is the reference to a mid-decade census of population. There is no constitutional authority for mid-decade census. See again Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution.

The third thing the reader should note concerning section 141 is the statement that the information obtained from the mid-decade census cannot be used for the constitutional purpose of the actual Census.

The fourth thing the reader should note concerning section 141 is the statement that the mid-decade census is being used for housing, and matters relating to population and housing. Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 does not contain a grant of power concerning these subjects.

This takes us to the other section cited as the authority for the American Community Survey. Section 193 restricts census surveys and the collection of preliminary and supplementary statistics…to the main topic of the census…necessary to the initiation, taking, or completion thereof. Constitutionally, the only topic of a census is a head count for apportioning direct taxes or determining the number of representatives in the House of Representatives. Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 does not contain a grant of power for any other census. The other ones referenced in section 193 fail to meet the constitutional topic of the only census enumerated in the Constitution.

Note: See again the first 2 constitutional principles discussed at the beginning of this article and then apply them to the American Community Survey.

Penalty Provisions for Failure to Comply with Either Survey Request

On their web-site, the Census Bureau states the penalty provision for failing to comply with either survey request is found in Title 13, U.S.C., Section 221.

Pursuant to this section, refusing to provide the requested information or neglecting to complete either survey subjects you to a fine of not more than $100.00. Willfully giving information that is false subjects you to a fine of not more than $500.00.

Then, in what I believe is a blatant attempt to misrepresent federal law and install fear in the hearts and minds of the American people so they will provide the requested information, the Census Bureau included the following statement after their reference to the section 221 penalties referenced above:

Title 18 U.S.C. Section 3571 and Section 3559, in effect amends Title 13 U.S.C. Section 221 by changing the fine for anyone over 18 years old who refuses or willfully neglects to complete the questionnaire or answer questions posed by census takers from a fine of not more than $100 to not more than $5,000.

A review of Title 18 shows it is entitled:“CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.”

Section 3559 is entitled: “Sentencing classification of offenses.” Section (a) states: “Classification.—An offense that is not specifically classified by a letter grade in the section defining it, is classified if the maximum term of imprisonment authorized is—(9) five days or less, or if no imprisonment is authorized, as an infraction.

Section 3571 is entitled: “Sentence of fine. Section (a) states: “A defendant who has been found guilty of an offense may be sentenced to pay a fine.” Section (b) states in part: “…an individual who has been found guilty of an offense may be fined not more than the greatest of—(7)for an infraction, not more than $5,000.” This is the only reference to a fine in the amount cited by the Census Bureau that matches the provision in section 3559 above.

The $5,000.00 fine referenced in section 3571 is a post conviction fine that only applies to an individual who has been charged and convicted of a criminal infraction as defined in section 3559. Unless an individual has been charged and convicted of some criminal offense connected to the Census and the crime is classified as an infraction, this $5,000.00 fine does not apply. Thus, their assertion that these sections changed the fines in section 221 to $5,000.00 is…you fill in the blank. In my mind, it’s a blatant lie that borders on fraud.

Another website to read:

Technology & MSG - American Community Survey Makes Me Uncomfortable

The original post was created in 2007, but take note of these brief updates:

Updates

05/14/08 - There have been quite a few visitors lately, referred here both by other web sites and by Google. So here’s an update. I haven’t heard anything from the Census Bureau about my failure to participate in the American Community Survey. I have received no further correspondence. I have not been contacted. I have not been fined. The threats of fines and jail time appear to be just that… idle threats.

03/13/10 - Still nothing.

Hat Tips:

Truth Is Treason.Net

No To ACS Blog

Technology & MSG Blog

*******
Update @ 4:50 p.m. PT:

Another website to read about this issue:

Nolan Chart - Invasion of Privacy: The American Community Survey

Excerpt:

Second, the Fourth Amendment guarantees my right to be secure .

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

To gather all of the information below, they would have to invade my home, and search my documents for this data. I contend the information requested is my property and the US Government has no valid claim upon it.

My answers to this survey are not private forever, as in 72 years they are released to the public. None of the questions beyond how many people live at my address would seem to apply to fire stations, libraries, or schools, and so, I must confess I will not be answering them.

According to the Washington Post, over 1,100 laptops have been reported missing from the Commerce Department since 2001 including over 250 from the Census Bureau.

Do I really want the answers to the questions below floating around on a laptop that is misplaced or stolen?

Searching the internet, I have discovered I may be in for some harassment as Big Brother attempts to force me to complete this form. I have read reports of Census workers harassing individuals in an attempt to get them to complete the survey. For some interesting stories check out this link.

You will read some interesting stories about what will be done to collect the data.

Lots of links to read here:

CheckPoint USA.org: The U.S. Census Bureau's
American Community Survey (scratch that) Interrogation

Issa Has Eye on Subpoena Team

It is often difficult to find good political news with all of the current corruption going on in Congress, pResident Obama's evil White House, all-the-Resident's clueless men and women in his Cabinet, all the Marxist cronies, SEIU thugs, the illegitimate czars, and the puppet-masters behind the curtain who make them all dance.

Hooray for The Steady Drip Blog: REPUBLICANS PLAN TO HIRE DOZENS OF INVESTIGATORS TO TARGET OBAMA...
Issa has eye on subpoena team

Thank God we have at least a few Republican Representatives (like Darryl Issa and Michele Bachmann) who are not afraid to combat the dangerous Marxist Obama puppet regime!

Hat Tip:

The Steady Drip

More good news! Continually demonstrate's Obama Epic Fail!

Obama Approval Number Sinks to New Low Following Lackluster Oil Spill Speech
posted by Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit - 8 hours ago
Another new low… President Obama’s approval number dropped to 41% following his lackluster oil spill speech on Tuesday. Rasmussen reported: The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday...

*******

The bad news:

New Bill: Obama Wants "Absolute Control" Over Internet
posted by evil@evilconservativeonline.com (Evil Conservative) at Evil Conservative Radio - 25 minutes ago
Well, we're one big step closer to the North Korea-fication of the United States. If this gigantic power grab goes through, the President will literally have the ability to shut down the internet. Tech Ame...

Gulf oil disaster, Fact vs Fiction series, Obama, Ken Salazar, Hypocrisy at highest levels, Elizabeth Birnbaum resigned, When will Obama resign? Interior Department policies
posted by citizenwells at Citizen WElls - 3 hours ago
Gulf oil disaster, Fact vs Fiction series, Obama, Ken Salazar, Hypocrisy at highest levels “Propaganda must not serve the truth, especially not insofar as it might bring out something favorable for the opp...

Radical Obama Administration Will File Suit Against Arizona
posted by Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit - 5 hours ago
He won’t secure the border — But, he’ll sue states that do. The radical Obama Administration will file suit against Arizona over their new immigration law that upholds federal law. Governor Jan Brewer hear...

The LIAR IN CHIEF is at it again!

“Unacceptable!”: Obama Breaks Promise To Jan Brewer
posted by nicedeb at Nice Deb » “Unacceptable!”: Obama Breaks Promise To Jan Brewer - 10 hours ago
Greta Van Susteren spoke with AZ Governor, Jan Brewer, last night by phone, after having interviewed her in person, the day before in Arizona. Brewer expressed her great disappointment in Obama for his fa...

Baucus: ObamaCare Creates "Near Chaos" Without More Spending
posted by William A. Jacobson at Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion - 7 hours ago
The pathetic, lie-infested legislation known as ObamaCare was based on phony numbers and unrealistic assumptions so that Democrats could sell the package to themselves and their delusional Democratic const...

Obamacare as Leverage for Complete Communist Control, as Promised
posted by noreply@blogger.com (Arlen Williams) at Investigating Obama - 12 hours ago
a.k.a., "single payer" "Obama's Marxist Allies Move on Healthcare, Socialist Agenda" in KeyWiki & New Zeal Democratic Socialists of America, is despite its deceptive name is the U.S.'s largest and probabl...

Top Obama Official Admits “The Economy Is Still Lousy”

posted by Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit - 12 hours ago
Barack Obama hoped to celebrate the stimulus today at a quick stop in Ohio but he may have a problem. His Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood who will be joining him today admitted yesterday in a conferenc...

And then there is this! What a blatant example of the LYING LAMESTREAM MEDIA OF MASS DECEPTION!

Figures. MSNBC Mockumentary Discusses Obama’s Days as Brilliant Constitutional Law Professor But Actually Shows Him Teaching Alinsky Tactics (Video)

posted by Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit - 1 day ago
It figures. The MSNBC mockumentary “Rise of the Right” discussed Obama’s days as a brilliant professor of Constitutional law but actually show Obama teaching Alinsky principles to college students. P/Oed P...

*******
Update: Also see:

Lame Cherry Blog: Justice Thy Name is Issa

Excerpt:

Rep. Issa though is promising to do something the entire GOP did not do in installing Obama as a fraud from Day One, in Mr. Issa is going to subpoena Obama, hire at least 20 more investigators not to "look" for Obama crimes, but to literally investigate the known Obama crimes which that crook Eric Holder will not investigate.

Gerald Walpin, Pennsylvania black thugs intimidating voters, Sestakgate, Romanoffgate, Blagovich affair, targeting US Citizens with Predators for assassination in Yemen, Treasury looting, Buffettgate, GM to UAW, Gulf Gusher, Salahigate, ACORN, Obama's illegal campaign finance and that does not even touch upon the biggest issue in history in Obama being undocumented.

Justice is a reason to vote for the Republican Conservatives as Justice will finally be administered to that cesspool of the Obama regime. There is no need to go fishing for bottom suckers like Henry Waxman did in the attempted coup against President Bush, because Obama is overflowing with crime.

Goodness people, we still do not know what happened to 350 million of bailout funds which Geithner lost, and we still do not know who got bailed out with tax funds which were probably foreign banks dumping debt on Americans in blackmail out of China, and we still do not know the names of Geithner's New York clique who got all that money while the rest of banking floundered.

Looking at this Obama regime is like stepping into a sewer. You can't help but get dirty as the entire executive branch is fecal matter. Why do you think all those blow flies are always buzzing around Obama? They are attracted to the stench of this regime.

What better situation for voters to vote with glee for the GOP in the affirmation that vote will stop Obama's Marxist dictatorship, stop his disarming America, stop replacing Americans with Mexicans, and while attempting to rebuild the US economy which Obama looted, to actually have the GOP investigating Obama crimes which are piling higher than Mt. Clinton.

Our Gangster Government

I have been busy commenting on another blog today. Therefore, I thought that I would make my latest blog post about those comments.

As many of the blogs in my sidebar are reporting there has been a small victory in one of the Obama ineligibility cases.

I have been commenting at the Citizen Wells blog, mainly in the following two threads:

Citizen Wells:
Miami Herald, Macon ledger-enquirer, Obama not a natural born citizen, Soldier: Obama not U.S. born, can’t send me to Afghanistan

My comment there:

Christinewjc // July 14, 2009 at 11:20 am

I may end up having a view that’s in the minority here, but I don’t agree that we should “keep this development under wraps” for fear that the ObamaFRAUD & cohorts will burst this balloon of progress. Remember Alinsky’s rules for radicals? Their job is to intimidate, debase, criticize, mock , cast fear, threaten – even with death and (add your own description here) in order to silence us all.

Think about the people (including Orly) who have been out there working hard to expose the usurper. These people are far to well known to have anything happen to them by the Obot thugs and not have raised much suspicion their way.

Yes. The “powers that be” may have already (allegedly) committed murders (e.g. Donald Young and several others) but they were done against people who were not well known at the time. We shouldn’t let the “fear” stop us from shouting from the rooftops about this issue! As Jacqlyn stated here, there are other cases that may well end up being successful at finally getting the usurper out of office.

The lawyers need to be careful about what they reveal – and what they should not reveal at this time. Hopefully all that are currently involved in cases against the fraud will not reveal their cards too soon…so to speak. I think that most are intelligent enough not to do anything that would inadvertently sabotage their own case(s).

As more and more Americans are becoming increasingly aware of the facts surrounding Obama’s ineligibility, they are realizing that there is good reason to doubt that Obama was Constitutionally eligible in the first place. The more people who come on board the “eject the usurper” train, the better it will be for our nation when the verdict comes down.

Think about how many more millions of people would have likely rioted if Obama was found guilty of being ineligible for POTUS and taken out of office just a few months after the inauguration. All hell would have broken loose!

Today, many hundreds of thousands of people WANT to know the answer to this question :

“During the election, then Senator Obama published a statement at his website which said that his birth status was “governed” by the British Nationality Act of 1948. Can you please tell the American people how a natural born citizen of the United States can be governed – at birth – by British law?”

They have also regretted their votes for him as they witness his continuing efforts to destroy our Constitutional Republic with his awful errors and terrible policies – including his Marxist/pro-Islam/terrorist releasing/bankrupting America/job losing/unconstitutional czar appointing/tax cheat Geithner appointing/ business destroying/anti-captitalism actions/ bank takeovers/car industry takeovers/the Crap and trade bill/ the Obama Hellcare/ the Stimulus bill that was a total bomb and went to cronies like ACORN/the Gitmo closing fiasco/the horror of the families of the U.S.S. Cole bombing victims when he halted the terrorists trial/….and the list goes on and on.

I have been posting about Obama for over a year at my blog- warning people about the dangers of this man. Sometimes, it’s necessary for people to see with their own eyes that a person IS dangerous, before they will believe us.

I have been praying for Obama’s removal since day one. It is hard to be patient. However, God’s timing is always perfect. He sees the future – we don’t. We can only surmise what may happen. I pray that Obama’s removal will be a peaceful transition – because the majority of Americans (except that 20% who will ALWAYS support Obama – no matter what crimes he would be found guilty of) see it as a necessary thing.

Just some of my opinions and views on the matter at hand.




Citizen Wells:
LA Times, blog, July 13, 2009, Alan Keyes, et al. v Barack H. Obama, et al, Orly Taitz, U.S. District Judge David O. Carter, Opponents of Barack Obama’s presidency claim small court victory

In this comment thread, I was replying to Ms. Helga who wrote:

ms.helga // July 14, 2009 at 4:21 pm

I am listening to Sean Hannity on the radio and he keeps saying that Drudge has a story on about some real estate plan that the gov. has that blah,blah,blah. You know what he is doing? He is afraid to say there is the story about Orly and the serviceman case against the usurper. He is still afraid of being called a Right Wing Nut instead of being called a Patriot. Oh well, he is trying to guide the unknowing into the fold.

I also replied to what Katie said:

Katie // July 14, 2009 at 3:01 pm

Anybody counted 60 days from July 13th yet?

It’s September 11th.

My response:

Christinewjc // July 14, 2009 at 6:58 pm

Ms. Helga -

I could be mistaken about this, but it is my understanding (from others who have told this to me) that Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, and other Fox News ANALYSIS pundits are prohibited from mentioning the Obama ineligibility issue. Why? Because of that Saudi billionaire that owns 7% (?) of the Fox News Channel stock.

If you notice, Glenn often does not blame Obama (directly, or only) for the mess we are in today. Glenn “spreads the blame around” and even encouraged protesters at the TEA Parties on April 15th not to “make it about Obama” or only blame Democrats.

One day during his radio show, I heard Beck claim that when he is able to, he will share more than he can share right now about what is really happening in America. I think this has to do with him keeping his job at Fox. If he was fired, then we wouldn’t be able to get the important information that he is sharing every day about our out-of-control government. The investigations that he does about it are very educational – and what I heard on the radio show today was quite astounding.

Remember how MSNBC mocked the “birthers” on several of their leftie pundit shows? They are trying to make the issue sound like a ridiculous conspiracy theory that is just a “rumor” going around the Internet via “right-wing nuts.”

Also, notice that Savage and Limbaugh have spoken about the COLB issue. They don’t have T.V. shows and so are more free to do that. I think I recall Mark Levin speaking about Obama’s BC on his radio show too.

Today, I did a search to see if Jon Voight has a blog. Couldn’t find one. I’m sure that he is aware of the ineligibility issue, but when he is interviewed on Fox he is (probably) forewarned not to discuss that. Does anyone know more about Voight’s stance on the issue?

Many pundits who agree with us may not think that anything can (or will) be done about this. I hope and pray that they are wrong!

I went on a couple other blogs today to read comments. Some are very suspicious that Orly got her hearing. They think that the Obots are about to present a forged COLB that will look so real that it will shut everyone up about the issue.

People are nervous about this issue and we all hope to God that ObamaFRAUD ultimately gets exposed and this usurper doesn’t get away with his flagrant treasonous actions against our country!

Also – notice that Brett Baier only reports the “straight news.” He doesn’t do any commentary about it. Did he bring it up with the panel of “all-stars” (as they call it) at the end of the show?

The naysayers on this issue will continue to pooh-pooh the evidence. The patriots will continue to expose the usurper. The lawyers will continue to bring their cases and all we need is for ONE to succeed.

Katie -

When you wrote this:

Anybody counted 60 days from July 13th yet?

It’s September 11th.

It sent chills down my spine! Coincidence? Only each individual can decide when we see the outcome of the case on that day.

A neighbor of mine (Christian) once told me that there appears to be a huge demonic spirit hanging over Washington D.C. As I thought about that comment, it seemed to me that the deception is so real upon those who would hold to Obama’s agenda. It is only those who “have eyes to see and ears to hear” what the Spirit of God is saying to the churches (meaning all believers in Christ) who were NEVER deceived about this issue in the first place. Sharing this information with all people (no matter what religion/faith etc.) is the duty of Christians everywhere. People are waking up to the TRUTH each and every day. The “scales are falling from their eyes” and they are realizing that we need to DO SOMETHING or we will lose our freedoms and Constitutional Republic.

I thank God for all the people (like Citizen Wells) who have been up close and in the center of this issue from the start. I’m certain that each and every patriot is being ridiculed and disparaged for their beliefs and work to expose Obama’s deception and lies. But we all need to consider it good works to help save this Republic.

Keep on talking, fellow patriots!! God is on the side of truth! One day, the truth will be made known. I just pray that it will be sooner, rather than later!

*******

After I posted that comment I noticed that some news shows are reporting on the two cases:

ms.helga // July 14, 2009 at 6:13 pm

Brett Baier on Fox just said soldier not going to war because CIC is not eligible-
The South // July 14, 2009 at 6:33 pm

ms.helga,

You beat me to the punch…lol

Yes, Bret even mentioned Taitz lawsuit in Georgia as well.
Jon S // July 14, 2009 at 6:34 pm

I just here’d Fox report the Soldier Obama Eligibility lawsuit!!

OMG I almost fell out of my seat-LOL
The South // July 14, 2009 at 6:34 pm

I meant to say,

Bret even mentioned the California case yesterday, and said a judge has agreed to hear the case on it’s merits.

Glad to see FOX saying something about it anyway!

zachjonesishome // July 14, 2009 at 6:40 pm

Here’s a report from CBS News

Soldier Challenges Deployment, Citing Obama’s Birth
CBS News – Brian Montopoli – ‎32 minutes ago‎
Reports the Ledger-Enquirer out of Columbus, Georgia: “Cook’s lawyer, Orly Taitz, who has also challenged the legitimacy of Obama’s presidency in other …

This is certainly good news that the media blackout seems to be lifting...albeit very slowly.

There is a not-to-be-missed video where Congresswoman Michele Bachmann exposes the current government take-overs as a "Gangster Government."


Here's a very poignant comment over at the Youtube site:

ls4vols (1 hour ago) This is only the beginning of what this country is facing. Gangster government - AMEN!! Hopefully those citizens out there who have half a brain, & who can think beyond their own specific needs will see what is happening to this country & stand up, be counted & boot out these radical, dishonest, hidden agenda types who are in it for themselves. Speaker Pelosi, Obama, Harry Reid, Barney Frank - all of them are crooks who are in it for themselves - no honor among thieves! GO SAVE THIS COUNTRY!!!!

Lastly, there is a very long essay that I will be reading soon. I have already mentioned some details about these groups here at my blog. This paper should give us all quite an education about them.

I thought that I would share it here so that readers can see the powerful characters that are behind the destructive policies that are being forced upon our nation through this current gangster government. Our current struggles for our freedoms and our beloved Constitutional Republic are at stake! Please become active in sharing this information so that more and more people will become aware!!

70 years: Chart Illustrates the Dominance by CFR, Trilaterals and Bilderbergers


Hat Tips:

Citizen Wells

RepubX

FYI - the RepubX site has has over 2,180 views today. A lot of people follow the information shared on that blog.

Let's Not Take Focus Off of Real Problem

I have been absent from blogging the last few days. Sometimes life gets very busy! There is SO MUCH to write about. However, I will start with a blog post over at Citizen Wells blog.

Sigh....where to begin.

I think that what is happening between the "Berg" side and "Orly" side is just what the ObamaBorg Bots want! Get their enemies fighting amongst themselves and it might take the focus off of the real problem - OBAMAFRAUD!

I read through some of the comments at Citizen Wells, then skipped down to write mine.

Personally, I think that Mario Apuzzo's Kershner v. Obama et al lawsuit has the best chance of succeeding. But that is only my own opinion. Does anyone happen to know whether or not an additional extension was given to the defendants in the lawsuit? I hope not. They already had 60 days - the total amount allowed by law. Today was supposed to be the deadline. The longer these lawsuits get stalled and drag on - the more damage the usurper is doing to our beloved nation. Makes me so sad and so angry!!

I had trouble trying to get on the RepubX site this morning (see cached page). Sent an email alerting DefendUSx. Haven't received a reply yet. It appears that the site has been hacked. The ObamaBorg fears the TRUTH that he is writing! What DefendUSx is sharing is very damaging to them!!! The hits there in April reached over 395,000! I hope that his site is back up very quickly today.

Whenever a site gets hacked, you just KNOW that it is because what the blogger is sharing is very damaging to ObamaFRAUD!!! I hope DefendUSx fixes the problem so that he can keep up the great work he is doing at his blog!

I continue to pray about the situation in our nation each day. God will answer in His own time and in His perfect way. We can only "see as through a glass darkly." The unseen spiritual battle behind it all is mostly unknown to us. But the Bible can give us hints.


Hat Tips:

Citizen Wells

A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers

*******
Second topic.

While getting ready to go out early yesterday morning, I listened to a portion of the Rick Roberts radio show. He was discussing the census takeover by the White House and the GPS tracking that ACORN people are currently doing around the nation.

The man (obviously from the Obamafraud admin) being interviewed OUTRIGHTLY LIED ABOUT TWO THINGS! He claimed that he "wasn't aware" of ACORN people going around to the houses and marking them with a GPS device. Plus, he claimed that Obama didn't take over the census from the former department (recall Judd Gregg quiting the post over this???) that had always handled it!!

Found this blog with some additional information about the GPS tracking:

The Patriotic Resistance

Anyone else out there highly alarmed by this???

These Are Not Frivolous Matters (Updated 4/4)

I know, I know...everyone is so sick and tired of the "Natural Born Citizen" controversy surrounding Obama and his ineligibility to hold the office of POTUS. However, the issue is not going away. On the contrary, it is heating up as each and every day passes.

Take a look at this interesting turn of events.

Eligibility judge backs off sanctions threat
Instead 'reprimands' attorney representing military officer

Read the entire article and then come back here.

Did you see it?

Did you catch the change in terminology given by the judge vs. what the plaintiff in the case stated?

Excerpt:

Robertson wrote: "The plaintiff says that he is a retired Air Force colonel who continues to owe fealty to his Commander-in-Chief (because he might possibly be recalled to duty) and who is tortured by uncertainty as to whether he would have to obey orders from Barack Obama because it has not been proven – to the colonel's satisfaction – that Mr. Obama is a native-born American citizen, qualified under the Constitution to be president.

[bold, italics mine]

Notice that Judge Robertson slyly protected himself by using the terms "native-born American citizen" instead of what our United States Constitution says is required for POTUS - "Natural Born Citizen."

[Update 4/4/09 - Please read More On What Is An Article II "Natural Born Citizen."

Additional links:

The Birthers.org

Country First: Obama Citizenship Facts.org ]


Compare that to what the plaintiff's local attorney (Hemenway) said in response:

"These are not frivolous matters, as the learned Judge Robertson has suggested. Possible illegal orders are a matter of great concern to officers in the armed forces. Undersigned counsel himself entered the Army of the United States during WWII and was promoted to Infantry Second Lieutenant preparing for the anticipated landings in Japan which were scheduled for November 1, 1945. But for President Truman’s use of nuclear weapons to end the war, this would have transpired. The legality of orders in and out of combat is of paramount importance," he wrote.

"It is sad to read this court's use of material from the Internet to imply that the issues in the numerous lawsuits filed have been resolved by the 'twittering and blogging' to determine that the litigants are invoking 'conspiracy theorists.' It suggests that the intellectual capacity of this court focused on the issues in the instant suit at a very low level, perhaps for political purposes, such as to win attention from the highest authority when a seat on the Supreme Court of the United States becomes vacant," Hemenway wrote.

Even Attorney Hemenway's daughter-in-law got into the argument!

In her report, his daughter-in-law said the judge, in his March 25 decision, still has trouble getting things right.

"Judge Robertson reconsidered his previous sanctions threat, possibly fearing monetary sanctions might spark a backlash and give a boost to the grassroots effort to force Mr. Obama to relinquish his records for public scrutiny," she wrote. "He errs in one key respect, alleging that Hemenway is 'unlikely to repeat the conduct that gave rise to this proceeding. …'

"Reprimand aside, Hemenway will continue to seek the truth about Obama's birthplace and citizenship, as will other patriotic citizens who believe no president and no future presidential candidate should be allowed to conceal documents that would prove that he or she is legally qualified to serve," she wrote.

"The judge errs in another respect, saying: 'Many people, perhaps as many as a couple of dozen, feel deeply about this issue, a strong indication that this judge feels he can dismiss the legal merits of the issue by pretending that there is no public interest at stake,'" she wrote.

"He must be unaware that an AOL poll, albeit admittedly unscientific, found that a majority of Americans believe Mr. Obama should release his records to determine his eligibility; that more than 345,000 U.S. citizens have signed an online petition demanding Obama's birth records be released; and that many more are blogging, calling, and writing congressional offices to ask their members of Congress to sign onto Congressman Bill Posey's bill," she wrote.

Posey's legislation would require future candidates for president to be vetted for eligibility, an admission that the last national election's screening process for candidates was substandard, she wrote.

"This is a judge who clearly is letting his skewed perception of public sentiment guide his judicial rulings. It would clearly have been judicially expedient, saving the taxpayers time and money, given the number of eligibility lawsuits filed across the country, simply to direct President Obama to produce an actual birth (or 'vault') certificate and not a COLB (Certification of Live Birth and one that lacks a doctor's signature or hospital name) that has been given to others not born on the island of Hawaii," she wrote.

However, the following paragraph reveals the REAL REASON Judge Robertson backed off of the punishment of sanctions against Hemenway:

John D. Hemenway also had suggested that if there were to be sanctions, court rules would allow him to require the release of Obama's birth information.

"If the court persists in pressing Rule 11 procedures against Hemenway, then Hemenway should be allowed all of the discovery pertinent to the procedures as court precedents have permitted in the past," he wrote to the judge.

"The court has referred to a number of facts outside of the record of this particular case and, therefore, the undersigned is particularly entitled to a hearing to get the truth of those matters into the record. This may require the court to authorize some discovery," Hemenway said.

For an 82-year-old attorney, Mr. Hemenway appears to be quite sharp!

Couple this turn of events regarding the dropping of sanctions against Mr. Hemenway with a blog post containing a letter sent by Dr. Orly Taitz to Attorney General Eric Holder et. al.:

DEFENDOURFREEDOMS.US published a new entry entitled “I need volunteers to make phone calls” on 4/1/2009 9:08:14 AM, written by Dr. Orly Taitz.

I need volunteers to make phone calls
Volunteer action needed

I need volunteers to call

Eric Holder-Att Gen
Elena Kagan -Solicitor General
Robert Mueller -director of FBI
Marc Sullivan-Director of Secret Service

We need an immediate response from Eric Holder- whether he will institute Quo Warranto proceedings against Obama, whether he will appoint a special prosecutor to investigate all of the criminal activities surrounding Obama. He has no right to sweep this under the rug, It is a matter of National urgency, a matter of National security. He has a duty to institute a Quo Warranto proceedings and to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate all the criminal activity related to Obama and his supporters. If he is not doing that, he needs to resign immediately or be removed immediately. His inaction equals to aiding and abetting all of the crimes committed and he himself will need to be indicted, tried and convicted to the full extend of the law.

Similarly, Elena Kagan, Robert Mueller and Marc Sullivan owe us answers, they are aiding and abetting this massive fraud, treason and other suspected crimes, committed by Obama and his supporters.

I have received a letter from the chief clerk of the Supreme Court William K Sutter- he is stating that they will not review quo warranto, but I can refile as Extraordinary petition for a writ of Mandamus. While there is nothing in the rules saying that they cannot hear quo warranto, just to move things along, I am rewriting the complaint and will submit it as an Extraordinary Petition for the writ of Mandamus. I still did not get an answer from the Chief Justice Roberts in regards to all the illegal activity going on in the Supreme Court. Please call the Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts, Chief Clerk William Sutter, chief of the police security for the Supreme Court officer Christine Giaccio 202-479-2369. What has been going on in the Supreme Court is the biggest scandal in our Judiciary system. This people have no right to sweep this under the rug all of these illegal activities, they owe American people answers

1. Who erased from the Supreme Court exterior docket information about my case Lightfoot v Bowen, right after the inauguration of Obama, while other cases where on the docket? This is particularly suspicious because my case stated that Obama is not eligible for presidency, and other cases remained on the docket .

2. What investigation was done on this issue?

3. Who is the police officer or Secret Service Agent or FBI agent in charge of this investigation?

4. What administrative action was done against clerk Danny Bickel, who refused to put on the docket and forward to Chief Justice Roberts and other Justices my second supplemental brief?

5. Why didn’t Justice Scalia know anything about four cases dealing with Obama’s illegitimacy for presidency supposedly heard in 5 conferences? Did the clerks hide those cases from the justices? Did the Justices actually discuss those cases in conferences? Where are the decisions signed by Justice Scalia, when he supposedly read the cases and forwarded them to three out of five conferences? Did Justice Scalia sign those decisions, or were those signatures forged? How could he read five pleadings about something that important as illegitimacy of the president and know nothing about it?

6. Did all nine justices sign the decision not to hear these cases on the merits, if so, they would’ve known the cases? Did somebody forge their signatures? Did clerks intentionally misrepresented the cases to put foreign National, citizen of Indonesia and possibly still citizen of Kenya Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama in the White House and keep him there by trampling on the Constitution and rule of law?

7. If all of the above officials refuse to provide immediate answers and action, they, themselves are guilty of aiding and abetting this massive fraud, treason and all the other related crimes and they will need to be prosecuted and punished to the full extend of the law.

Permalink: defendourfreedoms.us/2009/04/01/i-need-volunteers-to-make-phone-calls.aspx

Of course, I doubt that any of the people who were given the above letter will do any investigation. They are so in the tank for Obama that they would let him get away with anything.

But, it is good that Dr. Taitz sent such a letter. It will be documented proof that these people didn't act when they should have. The truth will one day come out for all to see.


Hat Tips:

World Net Daily

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation

*******

Great blog posts to read today:

Gateway Pundit: Actor Gary Graham: While Obama’s Out Of The Country Let’s Change It Back To "America" (Video)

YES!!!

*******

Gateway Pundit: All-Powerful Tax Cheat Says He Won't Rule Out Replacing More CEO's (Video)

Excerpt:

Change!
Who would have thought we'd ever see this in the United States?In less than 100 days Team Obama is already firing America's CEO's.And, Turbo Tax Cheat Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner told Katie Couric that he won't rule out replacing more CEO's.
Unreal.

Oh my...

I just had to add these comments on Gateway Pundit's Geithner article:


Business Under Nazis
http://mises.org/%20freemarket_deta...der=articledate
It was common in those days, as it is in ours, to identify the Communists as leftist and the Nazis as rightists, as if they stood on opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. But Mises knew differently. They both sported the same ideological pedigree of socialism. "The German and Russian systems of socialism have in common the fact that the government has full control of the means of production. It decides what shall be produced and how. It allots to each individual a share of consumer's goods for his consumption."

The difference between the systems, wrote Mises, is that the German pattern "maintains private ownership of the means of production and keeps the appearance of ordinary prices, wages, and markets." But in fact the government directs production decisions, curbs entrepreneurship and the labor market, and determines wages and interest rates by central authority. "Market exchange," says Mises, "is only a sham."

Mises's account is confirmed by a remarkable book that appeared in 1939, published by Vanguard Press in New York City (and unfortunately out of print today). It is The Vampire Economy: Doing Business Under Fascism by Guenter Reimann ( http://www.mises.org/books/vampireeconomy.pdf ), then a 35-year-old German writer. Through contacts with German business owners, Reimann documented how the "monster machine" of the Nazis crushed the autonomy of the private sector through onerous regulations, harsh inspections, and the threat of confiscatory fines for petty offenses."

Industrialists were visited by state auditors who had strict orders to examine the balance sheets and all bookkeeping entries of the company or individual businessmen for the preceding two, three, or more years until some error or false entry was found," explains Reimann. "The slightest formal mistake was punished with tremendous penalties. A fine of millions of marks was imposed for a single bookkeeping error."

Reimann quotes from a businessman's letter: "You have no idea how far state control goes and how much power the Nazi representatives have over our work. The worst of it is that they are so ignorant. These Nazi radicals think of nothing except 'distributing the wealth.' Some businessmen have even started studying Marxist theories, so that they will have a better understanding of the present economic system."

While state representatives are busily engaged in investigating and interfering, our agents and salesmen are handicapped because they never know whether or not a sale at a higher price will mean denunciation as a 'profiteer' or 'saboteur,' followed by a prison sentence. You cannot imagine how taxation has increased. Yet everyone is afraid to complain. Everywhere there is a growing undercurrent of bitterness. Everyone has his doubts about the system, unless he is very young, very stupid, or is bound to it by the privileges he enjoys.Nahanni 04.02.09 - 9:08 am #

The state says: you do what we want, or else we'll bankrupt you. Lovely! That's not a free market, that's fascism. Takekaze 04.02.09 - 9:11 am #

Though... doesn't the mafia also work like that? Takekaze 04.02.09 - 9:14 am #

*******

Gateway Pundit: Rove Plays the Marxist Card... Points to Obama's Alinsky Roots

Wish that Rove would have pointed this out BEFORE THE ELECTION!!!! Did he not already know this??

*******

American Thinker: The Soros Doctrine in Obama Foreign Policy

A MUST READ! Here's the conclusion which matches with the title of my blog post today:

At this point, a mere 2 months into the Presidency of Barack Obama, it seems painfully clear that we have not only elected a deceitful knave, but one intent on the complete dismantling of our own defenses, with seemingly very little concern for the consequences.


The icing on this poisonous cake would seem to be that we ourselves will pay for our own destruction.


Boiled down to the dry pot, we must conclude that President Obama, his entire Administration, the Democratic Congress and their favorite benefactor, George Soros, have an evolved form of slavery in mind. It's a type of slavery whereby the productive class is held shackled to the political class's outlandish worldview that there isn't a single problem under the sun, which cannot be swiftly solved with our money, produced by the sweat of our collective brow. They consider our wages and the wages of our children and grandchildren to be their own property, to be squandered in whatever manner they see fit.


And I believe this has a name, even though we modern folks have long forgotten not only its name, but the centuries of toil and buckets of blood that went into dismantling the system than enthroned it. It's called, I believe, serfdom.

*******

World Net Daily's April, 2009 issue of the Whistleblower magazine is all about Obama's ineligibility!

Your Papers, Please? Why millions want Obama to prove he's constitutionally qualified to be president.

The biggest reason interest in the Obama eligibility issue continues to mount, with ever more legal actions being filed and more Americans demanding answers, says WND Managing Editor David Kupelian, is simple: "Barack Obama is hiding something. About that statement, there is no dispute. Despite dozens of lawsuits, with plaintiffs including a former presidential candidate, a former deputy attorney general, many legislators, active-duty U.S. military and other serious people, Obama simply refuses to release his original, long-form birth certificate. That's the one that could actually prove he was born in Hawaii. What is posted on Obama's 'Fight the Smears' website as well as the FactCheck.org website is the abbreviated short-form 'certification of live birth' that could have been issued for a child born overseas, and thus does not prove he was born in Hawaii. What is so difficult about this to understand?"

*******

Update: April 4, 2009

Supremes asked to cooperate with FBI
Attorney investigating Obama's eligibility reports cyber attacks

Excerpt:

John Eidsmoe, an expert on the U.S. Constitution now working with the Foundation on Moral Law, said the demand is a legitimate course of action.

"She basically is asking, 'By what authority' is Obama president," he told WND. "In other words, 'I want you to tell me by what authority. I don't really think you should hold the office.'

Eidsmoe said it's clear that Obama has something in the documentation of his history, including his birth certificate, college records and other documents, "he does not want the public to know."

What else could be the reason for his hiring law firms across the nation to fight any request for information as basic as his Occidental College records from the early 1980s, he asked.

Previous stories:
Eligibility judge backs off sanctions threat
Citizen grand jury indicts Obama
Keyes to appeal case on Obama's eligibility
Federal criminal complaint contends Obama ineligible
Justice, Supremes confirm getting eligibility challenge
Suggesting eligibility proof gets congressman scorned
Eligibility bill hits Congress
Court: No need for state to check prez' eligibility
Did Supreme Court clerk torpedo eligibility cases?
Scalia: You need 4 votes for Obama eligibility case
Eligibility issue sparks 'edit war'
Wikipedia scrubs Obama eligibility
Judge: Eligibility issue thoroughly 'twittered'
Alan Keyes launches 'Liberty' blog
Republican senator says Snopes settled 'eligibility'
Senator: Eligibility is up to the voters
U.S. soldier gagged on prez's eligibility
More military officers demand eligibility proof
Obama eligibility tops AOL News
California used to check prez candidates' eligibility
Major General says president's eligibility needs proof
Eligibility lawyer argues for president's deportation
2nd U.S. soldier in Iraq challenges eligibility
Soldier questions eligibility, doubts president's authority
Senator questions Obama eligibility Alan Keyes: Stop Obama or U.S. will cease to exist
Keyes: President 'has something to hide' about eligibility
'Sanctions' sought in eligibility case
State lawmakers: Prove you're president, Mr. Obama
Congress sued to remove prez from White House
More challenges fail in Supreme Court
Supreme Court refuses 2nd challenge to eligibility
Status report: The eligibility issue
Supremes turn down request to stop Electoral vote
Join exploding demand for citizenship documentation
Electors challenged to investigate birth dispute
Last few hours to FedEx Electoral College voters
Supremes turn down request to stop Electoral vote
Eligibility question? FedEx Electoral College members
Not even Supreme Court can kill citizenship dispute
Supreme Court denies citizenship challenge
More than 60,000 letters sent to U.S. Supreme Court
Petition to see the birth certificate
Will Supremes review citizenship arguments?
Imaging guru: 'Certification' of birth time, location is fake
Chasm dividing Americans over birth certificate widens
WND launches new forum on Obama's eligibility
Supremes to review citizenship arguments
'Constitutional crisis' looming over Obama's birth location
Obama camp: Lawsuits by citizens are 'garbage'
Will Supreme Court have say in presidency?

Supreme Court to Determine Legality of Berg v. Obama UPDATED - MUST READ!

My thanks go to Jim Leasure of Journaling For Growth blog for pointing out a message forum that contained some really good links, commentary, explanations, and "what will happen" speculation regarding the ongoing controversy over Barack Obama's place of birth.

In the comment section of a previous post, Jim wrote:



jeleasure said...
Christine!!!!!
Check this story out.
This is from Sean Osborn of the North East Intelligence Network.
Obama Must Provide a Vaulted Copy by 1 December 2008

What is different now is the fact that the situation no longer involves Berg vs. Obama. With Justice Souter requiring the vault long official COLB to be shown to him at the U.S. Supreme Court, it has now become a case of the U.S. Supreme Court vs. Obama!

From NEIN blog:

[Update: Update 10 November 2008: Three items of direct relevance to this subject were just brought to my attention. First item is the draft of a WeThePeople Foundation full-page ad to be published inUSA TODAY the week of November 17, 2008. The second item is a petition to the Federal Election Commission and Mr. Donald McGahan, FEC chairman, to take responsibility to verify the eligibility of Mr. Barack H. Obama to be President of the United States which citizen patriots can sign (anonymously if desired) and submit to become personally engaged in this issue.]

"...has agreed that a review of the federal lawsuit filed by attorney Phil Berg against Barack Hussein Obama II, et al., which was subsequently dismissed for lack of standing is warranted. SCOTUS Docket No. 08-570 contains the details.

[Note: Update at 6:27 p.m. PT:

What this means is that on or before 1 DECEMBER 2008 Judge Surrick, who presides over the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, must respond to the Writ of Certiorari (sur-shee-uh-rare-eye) by providing to SCOTUS Justice Souter all documents and court proceedings in the case of Berg v. Obama. The crux of the matter here is that Obama (et al.) filed only a motion to dismiss on the grounds on Phil Berg's "lack of standing" to file the lawsuit. No information countering Berg's allegations or challenges to Obama's status as a natural born citizen were addressed. Judge Surrick agreed with the Obama motion and dismissed the case due to Berg's "lack of standing." Justice Souter will most certainly see the specific challenge to Obama's eligibilty pursuant to the Constitutional requirement for president and subsequently may then issue an order for Obama (et al.) to submit docmentation proving his natural born citizenship status to Judge Surrick, or to provide them directly to the SCOTUS.]



A review of that docket and the Rule 10 of the Supreme Court makes abundantly clear that Justice Souter's granting of a review on the Writ of Certiorari is not a right entitled to citizen Phil Berg, but rather is a matter of judcial discretion based upon a compelling reasons. That compelling reason is the Constitutional requirement that "No person except a natural born citizen ... shall be eligible to the office of President..."

Obama isn't getting out of this one!

I have previously expressed concern over the premature briefings that Obama is being allowed to attend with the Bush Admin. Sounds like a serious mistake to me!

Here is a copy of the rest of Sean Osborne's blog post:

A review of that docket and the Rule 10 of the Supreme Court makes abundantly clear that Justice Souter's granting of a review on the Writ of Certiorari is not a right entitled to citizen Phil Berg, but rather is a matter of judcial discretion based upon a compelling reasons. That compelling reason is the Constitutional requirement that "No person except a natural born citizen ... shall be eligible to the office of President..."


What this means is that on or before 1 DECEMBER 2008 Barack Hussein Obama II must respond to the writ of certiorari, and since the Berg v Obama case hinged primarily on the question of Obama's place of birth, it is almost inconceivable that Barack Obama will thumb his nose at the Justices of the Supreme Court and he is absolutely compelled to provide a vault copy his original birth certificate.


Another very salient fact to consider at this time is that, despite all of the pronouncements of the print and broadcast media, Barack Obama is not yet the President-elect of the United States. Barack Obama can only become the President-elect after the Electoral College convenes on 15 DECEMBER 2008 in their respective state capitals around the nation and casts their votes to elect the President and the Vice President. As you can see this election day occurs two weeks after the required response to the Supreme Court granted Writ of Certiorari.


The bottom line is this: the presidential election of 2008 remains an ongoing process, the outcome of which remains undetermined, and all talk about a potential Constitutional crisis in the United States are at least 36 days premature.

Note this additional comment. It points out that Obama is not OFFICIALLY President-elect until "the Electoral College electors cast their ballots on 15DEC08."

Sean Osborne:

I definitely need to expound for everyone on the very profound implications of what I have written in this NEIN Blog entry.

First, look at and read carefully the words seen in the image. [Note - it reads: It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.] What is stated there is the function of the federal judiciary, particularly and pentultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court. There is no higher leagal authority in the U.S. Government.

Obama [or his lawyer(s)] MUST respond no later than 1 DEC to the SCOTUS-granted Writ of Certiorari.

VERY, VERY FEW writs of this type are ever granted by SCOTUS.

This writ was granted due to some very compelling reasons - the number one reason hinges on whether Obama is Constitutionally elibible to hold the office of POTUS.

Obama MUST respond NLT 01DEC08.

Obama has two options in his response.

1. Tell the SCOTUS to take a flying leap by repeating his non-response to the federal court in PA or by asking for dismissal.

This is NOT a viable option for Obama to take. Remember your elementary, high school and college-level "Government 101" class education on the three co-equal branches of our government. Would Obama dare to tick-off deluxe the currently Conservative majority in the SCOTUS? He might, but, again, that course of action is highly inadvisable. I can conceive that should Obama flip the court the bird that the SCOTUS would then hold Obama in contempt and subpoena his vault birth certificate from the State of Hawai'i. Then the fight would really be on.

2. Comply and provide exactly what is requested of him in the Writ.

Obama is between a rock and a hard place IF there is no legal proof that he was born in Hawai'i. Evidence and legal proceedings to date strongly indicate that this is the fact of the matter.

Barack Obama IS NOT the President-elect. NOT YET. Obama does not become President-elect until the Electoral College electors cast their ballots on 15DEC08.

Which occurs first - Supreme Court proceedings, of the Electoal College voting?

The Electoral College electors in the various states do not have to vote for Obama. They can cast their votes for whomever they choose for both President and Vice President.

As I sstated the 2008 election process is not over- it is still very much an active process - with key Constitutional issues before the Supreme Court of the land.

So why is NO ONE in the MSM talking about this???

Why...INDEED!

Answer: Because they are the "Media of Mass Deception" - THAT'S WHY! However, in this case they are being also guilty of being "The Media of Omission" when it comes to anything that is negative news about Obama!

I was curious to see how many others blogs, message boards and forums were discussing this development. So, I typed into the search: "Obama vault COLB proof Dec 1."

Several hours ago, the search turned up 638 possible matches.

Since it has been a busy Sunday for me, I haven't gotten the chance to get through many of the pages. However, there are some good links on the first three pages.

Just now, I was curious to see what came up when I took out the word "vault." Got 2,020 matches this time.

There are probably lots of combinations of key words that can be typed in.

One thing is certain. Word is spreading about this - and this time Obama must comply with the U.S. Supreme Court's request.

HT: Jim Leasure of Journaling for Growth
The NEIN blog

*******
Update: Another great post about this is found over at Citizen Wells

*******
UPdate: Digg story.

*******

UPdate on 11/10/08 @ 8:30 a.m. PT

The more digging I do on this subject - the more evidence arises that IS SO VERY DISTURBING!!!

TAKE A LOOK AT THIS POST:

Judge Surrick Received the Decision He Issued

Excerpt:

In the “never-ending” drama that is known as the 2008 Presidential election, there is an appearance that the decision issued yesterday by the Honorable Judge R. Barclay Surrick in the matter of Berg v. Obama might have been SENT to the judge just a short time BEFORE he released the decision.

A fax copy of the decision from Judge Surrick was faxed to Mr. Berg from the Judge’s Chambers, pages 1-36, beginning at 18:09 October 24, 2008, and that is clearly notated by the receiving fax, starting at page 01/36. Page 36/36 is marked 18:16 October 24, 2008. What is interesting is not at the TOP of the fax pages; it is at the bottom.

Here's a link to the blow-up copy of the fax:

Surrick's Ruling Fax Copy

Excerpt continued:

At the bottom of each page is a notation from another FAX machine, indicating the date, page number and time. Unlike the pages faxed from Judge Surrick’s fax at 18:09, the “name” of the fax sender is blank, presumably so the sender’s identity could not be seen, and obviously with the sender unaware that the date and time would be stamped on it. The fax began from this mystery fax at 04:55P on October 24, 2008, and ended at 05:11P.

From all appearances, the clerk at Judge Surrick’s office merely took the fax off the machine, the Judge signed it, and it was faxed to Mr. Berg and the other attorneys involved in the case.

Why would a decision from the office of Judge Surrick have “fax date & time” stamp at the BOTTOM of its pages when it is faxed to the Plaintiff and Defendants? And why almost simultaneously were all of the docket links disabled on the case in PACER ( I checked other cases, and they weren’t disabled)?

Is it possible that a former law clerk of Judge Surrick, Christoper B. Seaman, might have wrote the decision? Now an attorney, Mr. Seaman is an attorney at the firm of Sidley, Austin in Chicago. Ironically, this is the same firm that employed Michelle Robinson Obama and Bernardine Dorn (wife of William Ayers), and where Barack Obama met Michelle.

Continue reading HERE

People...THIS IS GETTING REALLY FRIGHTENING and doesn't smell right - AT ALL!!! I have been thinking all along, but hesitant to say a particular word. But more and more evidence of legal manipulations and illegal thugary is revealing a HUGE CONSPIRACY behind the Obama campaign!

*******
FYI Update:

What is a Writ of Certiorari?
A writ of certiorari is a writ, or order, sent from a higher court to a lower one which orders the lower court to turn over transcripts and documents related to a specific case for review. In general, a writ of certiorari is issued by the highest court in a nation after a request from a petitioner. The decision to grant such a writ is made at judicial discretion.

The term comes from a Latin word which means “to be ascertained” or “to make certain.” A writ of certiorari is one of the ways in which a high court can review a case. When a petitioner asks for a writ of certiorari, the request must include an explanation of why the petitioner is resorting to a writ. The request must also indicate what in the case is under dispute, so that justices are aware of what they are being asked to review.

When a request for a writ of certiorari is submitted to a high court, clerks review it before passing it on to the justices. The justices vote on which cases shall be granted writs. In the United States, less than 5% of the requests for a writ of certiorari are granted, due to the high volume of requests and the busy court schedule. In Supreme Court shorthand, this is a “Cert. Denied.” When a writ is denied, it does necessarily mean that the higher court approves of the actions of the lower court, and the denial cannot be viewed as the court's final statement on the issue.

Since most high courts are responsible for interpreting and defending national constitutions and the law, justices tend to grant writs for controversial cases, or cases which may set a precedent. Once a lower court has been served with a writ of certiorari, it must turn the requested material over to the higher court. After review, the justices offer a decision on the material, either affirming the decision of the lower court, or rejecting it. In most cases, and majority and minority both submit a written opinion of the case.

Petitioners should consider a writ of certiorari a technique of last resort. Since the writ must include a reason why the petitioner has no other avenue of redress, it is important to explore all of the ways in which a legal problem can be addressed before submitting it to the highest court. In most nations, the judicial system has a tiered appeals process which should be followed first, in addition to other legal means which a lawyer may suggest.

Written by S.E. Smith

(bold mine)