Bombshell Obama Vetting: 1979 Newspaper Article By Valerie Jarrett Father-In-Law Reveals Start Of Muslim Purchase Of U.S. Presidency

Sometimes, researchers can find articles from the past to help make sense of what is REALLY going on under the immediate radar of the American people!  However, when the proper research is done, what may seem sensational at first actually becomes logically disturbing (as is pointed out by Pat Dollard in article below) and "suddenly makes a lot of previously confusing things make perfect sense." 

The following article is copied in its entirety, because I want a record of it all here at Talk Wisdom.

 I refuse to post the photos here; especially the face of Ovomit (and that is NOT a strong enough name for the treasonous...well...what comes to mind?...you finish the sentence) or his backside bowing to a Saudi king!

Please spread this far and wide.  Apparently, this article was posted over 5 months ago!  However, this is the first time that I have seen it.  I have read various articles about this possibility before, but none of them put it all together like this one!

Hat tip to Commieblaster for including the link on their webpage which led me to both the Pat Dollard commentary and the original article at the Daily Interlake.com site!

~  Christine

*******

Copy of article posted at Pat Dollard's site:

Why would Muslim oil billionaires finance and develop controlling relationships with black college students? Well, like anyone else, they would do it for self-interest. And what would their self-interest be? We all know the top two answers to that question: 1. a Palestinian state and 2. the advancement of Islam in America. The idea then was to advance blacks who would facilitate these two goals to positions of power in the Federal government, preferably, of course, the Presidency. And why would the Arabs target blacks in particular for this job? Well, for the same reason the early communists chose them as their vanguard for revolution (which literally means “change”) in America. Allow me to quote Trotsky, in 1939: “The American Negroes, for centuries the most oppressed section of American society and the most discriminated against, are potentially the most revolutionary element of the population. They are designated by their historical past to be, under adequate leadership, the very vanguard of the proletarian revolution.” Substitute the word “Islam” for the words “the proletarian revolution,” and you most clearly get the picture, as Islam is a revolutionary movement just like communism is. (Trivia: it is from this very quote that communist Van Jones takes his name. Van is short for vanguard. He was born “Anthony”). In addition, long before 1979, blacks had become the vanguard of the spread of Islam in America, especially in prisons.

Interestingly, in context with the fact that this article was written by her father-in-law, Valerie Jarrett has an unusual amount of influence over Obama (along with personal security that may be even better than his, another unusual and intriguing bit of business here). And equally interesting is that Obama, who may have been a beneficiary of this Muslim money, and may now be in this Muslim debt, has aggressively pursued both of the Muslim agendas I cited above. And, also equally interesting, is that Obama has paid a king’s ransom for court ordered seals of any such records of this potential financing of his college education, and perhaps, of other of his expenses.

Lastly, it’s very important to note that the main source for the article is Khalid Mansour, “the same lawyer who allegedly helped arrange for the entrance of Barack Obama into Harvard Law School in 1988.” (Valerie Jarrett, by the way, was born in Iran. The one country protected by Obama from the sweep of the Arab Spring.) Now all of this may seem sensational, but let’s face facts. What makes it most disturbing is that not only is it all logical, but it suddenly makes a lot of previously confusing things make perfect sense. – Pat Dollard

Excerpted from Daily Interlake: Searching old newspapers is one of my favorite pastimes, and I have tried to use them many times to shed light on current events — or to inform readers about how the past is prologue to our very interesting present-day quandaries.

Recently, I came across a syndicated column from November 1979 that seemed to point 30 years into the future toward an obscure campaign issue that arose briefly in the 2008 presidential campaign.
Though by no means definitive, it provides an interesting insight, at least, into how Chicago politics intersected with the black power movement and Middle Eastern money at a certain point in time. Whether it has any greater relevance to the 2012 presidential campaign, I will allow the reader to decide. In order to accomplish that, I will also take the unusual step of providing footnotes and the end of this column so that each of you can do the investigative work for yourself.

The column itself had appeared in the St. Petersburg (Fla.) Evening Independent of Nov. 6, but it was the work of a veteran newspaperman who at the time was working for the prestigious Chicago Tribune and whose work was syndicated nationally. (1)
 
So far as I know, this 1979 column has not previously been brought to light, but it certainly should be because it broke some very interesting news about the “rumored billions of dollars the oil-rich Arab nations are supposed to unload on American black leaders and minority institutions.” The columnist quoted a black San Francisco lawyer who said, “It’s not just a rumor. Aid will come from some of the Arab states.”

Well, if anyone would know, it would have been this lawyer — Donald Warden, who had helped defend OPEC in an antitrust suit that year and had developed significant ties with the Saudi royal family since becoming a Muslim and taking the name Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour.
Al-Mansour told Jarrett that he had presented the “proposed special aid program to OPEC Secretary-General Rene Ortiz” in September 1979, and that “the first indications of Arab help to American blacks may be announced in December.” Maybe so, but I looked high and wide in newspapers in 1979 and 1980 for any other stories about this aid package funded by OPEC and never found it verified. (Continued after the jump)


You would think that a program to spend “$20 million per year for 10 years to aid 10,000 minority students each year, including blacks, Arabs, Hispanics, Asians and native Americans” would be referred to somewhere other than one obscure 1979 column, but I haven’t found any other word of it.

Maybe the funding materialized, maybe it didn’t, but what’s particularly noteworthy is that this black Islamic lawyer who “for several years [had] urged the rich Arab kingdoms to cultivate stronger ties to America’s blacks by supporting black businesses and black colleges and giving financial help to disadvantaged students” was also the same lawyer who allegedly helped arrange for the entrance of Barack Obama into Harvard Law School in 1988.

That tale had surfaced in 2008 when Barack Obama was a candidate for president and one of the leading black politicians in the country — Percy Sutton of New York — told an interviewer on a Manhattan TV news show that he had been introduced to Obama “by a friend who was raising money for him. The friend’s name is Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, from Texas. He is the principal adviser to one of the world’s richest men. He told me about Obama.” (2)

This peculiar revelation engendered a small hubbub in 2008, but was quickly dismissed by the Obama campaign as the ditherings of a senile old man. I don’t believe President Obama himself ever denied the story personally, and no one has explained how Sutton came up with this elaborate story about Khalid al-Mansour if it had no basis in fact, and in any case al-Mansour no longer denies it. (3)
Back in 2008, while actually supporting Hillary Clinton in the New York primary, Percy Sutton was interviewed on TV and said that he thought Barack Obama was nonetheless quite impressive. He also revealed that he had first heard about Obama 20 years previously in a letter where al-Mansour wrote, “there is a young man that has applied to Harvard. I know that you have a few friends up there because you used to go up there to speak. Would you please write a letter in support of him?”

Sutton concluded in the interview, “I wrote a letter of support of him to my friends at Harvard, saying to them I thought there was a genius that was going to be available and I certainly hoped they would treat him kindly.”

Until now, there really has been no context within which to understand the Sutton story or to buttress it as a reliable account other than the reputation of Sutton himself as one of the top leaders of the black community in Manhattan — himself a noted attorney, businessman and politician. But the new discovery of the 1979 column that established Khalid al-Mansour’s interest in creating a fund to give “financial help to disadvantaged students” does provide a clue that he might indeed — along with his patron, Arab Prince Alwaleed bin Talal — have taken an interest in the “genius” Barack Obama.

It also might be considered more than coincidence that the author of that 1979 newspaper column was from Chicago, where Barack Obama settled in 1986 a few years after his stint at Columbia University. It is certainly surprising that the author of that column was none other than Vernon Jarrett, the future (and later former) father-in-law of Valerie Jarrett, who ultimately became the consigliatore of the Obama White House.

It is also noteworthy that Vernon Jarrett was one of the best friends and a colleague of Frank Marshall Davis, the former Chicago journalist and lifelong communist who moved to Hawaii in the late 1940s and years later befriended Stanley and Madelyn Dunham and their daughter Stanley Ann, the mother of Barack Obama. (4)

And to anyone who has the modicum of a spark of curiosity, it is surely intriguing that Frank Davis took an active role in the rearing of young Barack from the age of 10 until he turned 18 and left Hawaii for his first year of college at Occidental College in Los Angeles. (5)

It is also at least suggestive that Obama began that college education as a member of the highly international student body of Occidental College in 1979, the same year when Vernon Jarrett was touting the college aid program being funded by OPEC and possibly Prince Alwaleed. The fact that President Obama has studiously avoided releasing records of his college years is suggestive also, but has no evidentiary value in the present discussion. (6)

The nature of Vernon Jarrett’s relationship to Khalid al-Mansour is likewise uncertain, but it is very likely they had known each other as leaders of the black civil-rights movement for many years. Under his previous name of Donald Warden, al-Mansour had founded the African American Association in the Bay Area in the early 1960s. He had also helped inspire the Black Panther Party through his association with black-power leaders such as Huey Newton and Bobby Seale. Seale, of course, had a famous association with Chicago later, when he was part of the Chicago Eight charged with conspiracy and inciting to riot at the Democratic National Convention in 1968. (7)

In any case, it doesn’t matter if Vernon Jarrett and Khalid al-Mansour had a personal relationship or not. For some reason, al-Mansour had used Jarrett as the messenger to get out the word about his efforts to funnel Arab oil money to black students and minority colleges at about the same time that Barack Obama began his college career. That doesn’t mean either Jarrett or al-Mansour knew Obama at that time, but eight years later when Obama was a rising star in Chicago, a friend of Bill Ayers and Valerie Jarrett, it is much more likely that he did indeed have the assistance of very important people in his meteoric rise. The words of Percy Sutton about what al-Mansour told him regarding Obama certainly have the ring of truth:

“His introduction was there is a young man that has applied to Harvard. I know that you have a few friends back there… Would you please write a letter in support of him? (That’s before Obama decided to run.) … and he interjected the advice that Obama had passed the requirements, had taken and passed the requirements necessary to get into Harvard and become president of the Law Review. That’s before he ever ran for anything. And I wrote a letter in support of him to my friends at Harvard, saying to them that I thought there was a genius that was going to be available and I certainly hoped they would treat him kindly…” (2)

What possible significance could all this have? We may never know, but Vernon Jarrett, back in 1979, thought that OPEC’s intention to fund black and minority education would have huge political ramifications. As Jarrett wrote:

“The question of financial aid from the Arabs could raise a few extremely interesting questions both inside and outside the black community. If such contributions are large and sustained, the money angle may become secondary to the sociology and politics of such an occurrence.” (1)

He was, of course, right.

As Jarrett suggests, any black institutions and presumably individuals who became beholden to Arab money might be expected to continue the trend of American “new black advocacy for a homeland for the Palestinians” and presumably for other Islamic and Arabic interests in the Middle East. For that reason, if for no other, the question of how President Obama’s college education was funded is of considerably more than academic interest.


Footnotes from The Daily Interlake.com site:

Footnotes:
1) “Will Arabs Back Ties to Blacks With Cash?” by Vernon Jarrett — http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=950&dat=19791106&id=RcFaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=GFkDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6597,1456637&hl=en
2) Percy Sutton interview on NY1, March 2008 — http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EcC0QAd0Ug&e
3) The National and International Roundtable posted a one-hour interview with Khalid al-Mansour and other African American Association leaders on the Internet just last week. In the introduction of al-Mansour, the black host notes that his guest had been a patron of Barack Obama and had recommended him for admission to Harvard Law School. You will note that al-Mansour does not correct him.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/solutionsnowradio/2012/09/19/the-national-and-international-roundtable#.UFptoKF6-yA.blogger
4) “All in the (Political) Family,” by Paul Kengor — http://spectator.org/archives/2012/08/03/all-in-the-political-family
5) “Dreams from my Father,” by Barack Obama — http://www.amazon.com/Dreams-From-My-Father-Inheritance/dp/B000R9EG3Q
6) “Why Obama’s College Records Matter,” By Monte Kuligowski — http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/07/why_obamas_college_records_matter.html
7) “Who is Khalid al-Mansour?” by Kenneth R. Timmerman — http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/khalid-al-mansour-Obama/2008/09/04/id/325191

Hat tips: Pat Dollard.com Daily Interlake.com

*******


HORRIFIED YET???

Trump Breaks MSM Obama Eligibility Silence [Update!]

It is interesting to note that after Donald Trump asked to see Obama's birth certificate, the questions surrounding Obama's eligibility continue to spread like wildfire. What's more, Trump continues to not back down on the issue. Trump even went so far as to say, "There is something on it that he (Obama) doesn't like."

As usual, Whoopie Goldberg (again!) disappoints on The View when she tried to blame racism for the concern over why Obama refuses to show the American people absolute proof of where he was born; as well as all the rest of the pertinent information that would reveal details about his birth, upbringing, college years etc. Why would someone with nothing to hide seal all of his records??  Why would someone with nothing to hide shell out 2 million dollars in lawyer fees to keep the case out of the courts?

Drkatesview: Trump Card Beats Race Card has a great post up on this subject. No wonder the Soros lefties heads are exploding!

Hat Tip:

Drkatesview

*******

Update on Sunday, April 17, 2011:


This post was included in a column over at Canada Free Press!


Canada Free Press: Flushing Out RINOs, Neo-cons, Faux Conservatives, Controlled Opposition, and the Clueless

Is Obama A Marxist? Answer: YES!

While attempting to answer several questions from Kevin in the blog post comment thread here, I thought that I would bring the conversation to a new blog post. Why? For several reasons. I think that it is extremely important for conservatives to continually educate the public, via blogs, books, videos, etc. about the true nature of Obama. This is a very important issue.

Kevin wrote:

Hi Christine,
Arab is not recognized as a race ( but don't believe me, go ahead and look it up--Wikipedia does a good job at explaining Arab). It is an ethnicity, just like 'Irish' is not a race but an ethnic group. For example, saying someone is 50% Irish is not necessarily saying they are 50% white (or whatever race you want to pick). I still don't understand the '6.25% African Negro from his father's side.' I think the author of this statement is confusing race with ethnicity, unless there is another racial mixture of his African grandparents or great grandparents. This whole percentage thing is rather odd as well, if you ask me. What is the point? If it is to point out that he is different and 'other,' then we have to ask why it is being pointed out.

In the same comment thread, Kevin also wrote:

And again I ask--what is Marxist about Obama and his policies? I would love to see some parallels to other Marxist regimes and what our own President is doing. Did you see that article at the CNN website that was from the President of the Socialist USA party? He said that Obama is no such thing. Interesting...

My first inclination was to reply, what ISN'T Marxist about Obama and his policies!!?? It is so clear to anyone paying any attention to what is going on in the White House and Congress, it seems to me that the question doesn't even need to be asked! However, since Kevin did ask (several times) for a reply from me, I thought that it would be best to be thorough and present as much evidence as possible. [Note: Do not miss the videos over at Investigating Obama. A man who KNEW Obama in his younger years reveals much evidence that Obama was, and still is a Marxist. In fact, he goes so far as to claim that Obama is a revolutionary Marxist activist!



My reply:

Kevin,

I think that the question is not "why is it being pointed out," but why has it been purposely hidden? A blogging friend of mine once wrote that he thinks Obama (and all of his cohorts) want to hide his Muslim roots.

A while back, Glenn Beck had a segment on his show about all of the radial socialists, Marxists, Communists, and Maoists who influenced Obama throughout his entire life. He did a quick recap of Obama's life from childhood to adulthood. What I found odd was that Beck left out Obama Jr's. adoption by Lolo Soetoro, the move to Indonesia, and the fact that Obama was taught Muslim practices during his early childhood schooling there. Why did Beck leave that out? Perhaps because of a time constraint. But I think that it had a lot to do with not revealing to the public Obama's Muslim schooling and roots. The Fox News Channel is 17% owned by Saudis - and keeping such information from the public might be deemed important to them.

In another comment, you wanted me to tell you why I think that Obama is a Marxist. One telling sign is that he has been surrounded by, and influenced by them his entire life! But don't just take my word for it. You can read :

1. Investigating Obama: Barack Obama Argued Strict Revolutionary Marxism to John C. Drew at Occidental College.

2. Sean Hannity's new book - Conservative Victory - Defeating Obama's Radical Agenda. [Only $10.35 at Walmart or $8.00 at Amazon.] Sean labels Obama as a socialist. Just a different degree of the Marxist, Communist brand.

3. Scroll down at the blog site when you click on the link below and read the The Obama File sidebar links on the right of the page. A plethora of information about Obama's Marxism.

4. Watch former Glenn Beck Program shows online. He points out how many of Obama czars and staff are Marxist or downright Communists!

Kevin, the majority of Americans are now on to Obama, his lies, and all of his terrible schemes. He will become a lame duck after the November 2010 elections and hopefully his disastrous bills will all be repealed. He will be a one term president OTP and our nation will be back to having a sane leader again in 2012 (if not sooner because hopefully, one of the lawsuits pointing out his obvious ineligibility might get a hearing before then).

I would also like to recommend reading:

Daily Thought Pad: Wall Street Journal Sizes Up Obama - They've Got Him Figured Out.

Hat Tips to all links.

*******

Update:

Also see:

American Crisis: Who is Barack Obama? The scariest list of facts about President Obama you've ever seen... The President who HATES America.

*******

Why Don't We Know the "Real" Obama?

Last night, I accidentally injured the middle finger on my right hand. Slammed a door on it! OUCH - does not quite explain how much it hurt! Anyway, readers will probably be happy to read that my posts will be brief over the next week or so. ;-)

Today, I read a great post over at Nice Deb's blog: The Obama Conundrum: Who Is He… What Is He…

The thing that is most evident about Obama now is the fact that he put on a fake "teleprompter" persona during the campaign. People were asking - even back then - who is this guy? Obvious to the most careful observer, we now know that he was reading "other people's words" that did not fit his true persona or ideology.

Joe Wilson was right! Obama - YOU LIE!

The Obama File author has that same question in the sidebar at his website:

Who is this guy?

What is his secret?

Why won't he release his
bona fides?

This is despite the fact that the author of that blog has more documented evidence about Obama than anyone else out there!

Why is it that we don't know the "real" Obama? I have a theory - just as many others do - that the reason we don't know him is because he is a puppet being dangled by several radical and Marxist puppeteers! Does George "satan's brother" Soros ring a bell? Glenn Beck had Soros at the top of the heap on his chalkboard presentation last evening. Soros is the grand pooh-bah financing all the criminal elements and organizations "advising" Obama.

Obama was the perfect "stooge" to bring about Soros' evil intentions against America. Early on, Soros saw Obama as similar to himself: "wasn’t friendly and was standoffish and arrogant." He was the perfect puppet for this megalomaniac puppet master.

Nice Deb shares:

I recently came upon an interview of Debbie Revor, who once worked for Obama, that sheds some light what “Obama, the man”, Obama, the “community organizer” is like:

Q. What was your impression of Sen. Obama?

A. He wasn’t friendly and was standoffish and arrogant from the start of my job there. My first impression was that I didn’t like him because of this arrogance.

Q. What were his duties with the law firm to the best of your knowledge?

A. Obama was an associate at the firm and had been there about two years. I saw him have meetings with the other attorneys and he helped with hearings and did prep work for trials. Obama probably did other things too, but I wasn’t his personal secretary. These are the things I observed him do or heard his secretary talk about.

Q. You told me the law firm you worked for dealt with civil rights. So would it be safe to say Obama was a champion for the downtrodden and less fortunate? What were your personal impressions of Obama? Did he seem like helping the poor was his primary agenda?

A. I didn’t feel at the time Obama cared about the downtrodden and less fortunate and I still don’t feel that way. I didn’t see any proof of that at all during the 11 months I worked there. I don’t have any knowledge of Obama helping in the community in any way. We as legal secretaries weren’t paid very much there and he could’ve started helping with that – speaking up about the low pay we had. I didn’t see that he cared about our state in life. I also saw him act in ways that were very self-serving, self-focused and ambitious.

Read the entire interview. It is very revealing.

The always succinct Pamela Geller asks, stupid or evil?

I haven't ventured over to read Pam's article yet (will do that next). However, I think that the answer may genuinely be that Obama is a little of one (stupid) and a LOT of the other (evil)!

A terrible thought occurred to me while reading the comments of "kay" under this post over at Investigating Obama.

Go read the post and comments, then return here.

Do you think that these evil, corrupt people (Soros & cohorts) would even hesitate to take Obama out if he fails in completing their agenda? What if one of the eligibility lawsuits succeeds and Obama is exposed as a usurper and fraud? Would the "powers that be" do anything and everything necessary to keep from going to jail? How scary! Just the thought of it makes me shudder.

Maybe you think such thoughts are loony. So be it. But it has happened before. Did you know that the murders of the mayor and Harvey Milk in San Francisco in the 70's was done by a fellow crazed Democrat? And - if one does more research, the reason that Milk was killed was not because of his gay rights advocacy. It had more to do with a clash of political ideologies within the same political party!!

Ah! My finger is throbbing. Time for an ice pack.

Here is a copy of my comment at Nice Deb's blog:

What a great post! I had no doubt in my mind that Obama was both a con artist and evil person the moment that I learned about his radical death-to-unborn babies stance a year and a half ago. That was my very first objection about him and the more I learned, the more concerned I became. Now, what we know is just downright over the top! He hates our American Republic, our Constitution, our military, and especially all the people who disagree with his far-left radical Marxist, anti-Christian, anti-Israel, pro-Muslim agenda. Or, is it "the powers that be" who are dictating to him the real culprits? Probably both.


I am glad to read that even those on the political left are now waking up from their previous Kool-Aid drinking stupor and are seeing Obama for what he truly is. He's a person who is intent on destroying our country in every way that it is humanly possible to do so. He is an enemy of our Republic, a usurper as the bogus POTUS, and worst of all, he is a puppet surrounded and lead by a plethora of corrupt people. Watergate pales in comparison to all the laws that he and his cronies have broken! When are all of his lies and all of the corruption he's involved in going to finally be brought to justice? I don't know - but I hope and pray that it will be soon - while we still have our Republic mostly intact and still have the time to reverse the damage this terrible administration has wrought upon our people.

My advice today is DO NOT MISS GLENN BECK'S T.V. SHOW WHERE HE WILL PRESENT EXPOSURE OF THE PROPAGANDA CURRENTLY BEING SHOWN AND TAUGHT IN OUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS!

Hat Tips:

The Obama File

Nice Deb

Investigating Obama

Oh My Gosh!! (Update on Obama Case)

Could the following information be what Glenn Beck was referring to (see previous post for link to video) during his Fox and Friends interview?

RepubX: WOULD THESE TWO DOCUMENTS THROW PELOSI AND TOP DEMOCRATS INTO FELONY PRISON? INSTEAD OF HIDING THEIR FRAUD UPON AMERICA?

Hat Tip:

RepubX

*******
For convenience, here is a copy of the link from previous post:

Gateway Pundit has a post up that includes a video of Glenn Beck's appearance on Fox News' "Fox and Friends" show where Glenn states, Glenn Beck Plugs This Week's Show: "You Will See Something Exposed & People Will Go To Jail" (Video)

Hat Tip:
Gateway Pundit

*******

UPDATE AT 3:34 P.M. PT ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE:

RepubX is reporting: Obama case going to trial if Oct. 5th hearing on motion to dismiss not upheld - trial wouldn't be until late January 2010!!

Cross-posted here:

Quote:

Obama case going to trial if Oct. 5th hearing on motion to dismiss not upheld - trial wouldn't be until late January 2010!!
by DefendUSx September 08, 2009 16:05
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

A California judge today tentatively scheduled a trial for Jan. 26, 2010, for a case that challenges Barack Obama's eligibility to be president based on questions over his qualifications under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

If the case actually goes to arguments before U.S. District Judge David Carter, it will be the first time the merits of the dispute have been argued in open court, according to one of the attorneys working on the issue.

In a highly anticipated hearing today before Carter, several motions were heard, including a resolution to long-standing questions about whether attorney Orly Taitz properly served notice on the defendants, which she had.

In a second ruling, Carter ordered that attorney Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation can be added to the case to represent defendants Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, who had been removed by an earlier court order. Drake, the vice presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, and Robinson, the party's chairman, were restored as plaintiffs.

But the judge did not immediately rule on Taitz' motion to be granted discovery – that is the right to see the president's still-concealed records. Nor did Carter rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case, submitted by the U.S. government, following discussion over Taitz' challenge to the work of a magistrate in the case.

Carter ordered a hearing Oct. 5 on the motion to dismiss and ordered arguments submitted on the issue of discovery.

If the case survives that challenge, a pretrial hearing has been scheduled for Jan. 11 and the trial for two weeks later.

More to come...

Hat Tip:

RepubX

*******

ALSO, FROM THE OBAMA FILE:

From The Courtroom -- The Latest

The Give Us Liberty blog is blogging from the courtroom.

At 9:26 AM there was no visible media turnout for this hearing as in no SatCam uplink trucks.

At 10:02 Justice Carter noting the packed courtroom and overflow crowd waiting in the hallways has ordered a change to a larger courtroom and has taken a 2 hour recess to accommodate the transfer of officers of the court and spectators.

The estimated age range of those present is 18 to 80 -- 70% Men -- 30% Women -- age 60+ seems to be the majority.

Attorney Orly Taitz appeared relaxed -- calm cool and collected.Justice Carter recessed the court at 12.30 pst 9/8/09 --

his rulings:10/5/09 Defense Motion to Dismiss (MTD) to be heard -- Judge Carter indicated only a very strong compelling reason would move him to dismiss at this point.

He will review the defense's 9/4/09 MTD. He wants to hear the case on it's merits.

Discovery to be ordered 10/5/09 if Motion to Dismiss is thrown out.

1/11/10 Pre Trial Set -- procedural for other motions, depositions, scheduling, etc

1/26/10 Trial Date Set -- earliest available date for Justice Carter.

Historical Archive on Obama

Good News! The Obama File is back. Well - at least there is much more at the link than the "Obama - show us the birth certificate" sign that was put up when the author decided to take his website down. I'm certainly glad that he had a change of heart. The author has put up An Historical Archive. PLENTY to read there to keep you busy for a few months!

When you click on each category title (on the left), you will find a mountain of important information.

In the "Who Is This Guy" section, the author sums it up quite well:

I've read everything I could get my hands on about Barack Hussein Obama in the last two years and I know less about him now than I did at the beginning. I know he wrote most of what you think you know about him, and has admitted himself that a lot of it is made up.

Obama is a privileged African-American, who has not shared the black American experience. By birth, blood and training, he was a Muslim, who became a member of a Marxist, Black-African church. He is a socialist whose politics are rooted in Marx and whose methods were conceived by the communist, Alinsky. He is a master at shaping his own mythology and completely unqualified to be Commander in Chief. He is not now, nor ever has been, a "natural born citizen" -- he was, at birth, a British subject and citizen of Kenya -- a fact published on his own website.

He has lived for almost 50 years without leaving any footprints -- none! There is no Obama documentation -- no records -- no bona fides -- no paper trail -- nothing! -- and he's got an army of lawyers making sure it stays that way -- and the unflattering stuff, out there in the world and on the Internet -- it's systematically disappearing down the rabbit hole.

Yes. Much of what was once available on the Internet has been scrubbed - except for the blogs and websites that have kept copies on their own sites. Thank you, Mr. "Obama File" author, for all of your hard work in archiving all of this usurper's history of lies, corruption, evil, horrible policies, unconstitutional ineligibility for POTUS and the devastating harm that he has wrought against our beloved Republic.

Still praying for the day that he is removed (hopefully, peacefully) from office.


Hat Tip:

The Obama File

Breaking News Re: Bogus POTUS

Breaking News! A report is now circulating that a genuine copy of Obama's Kenyan Birth Certificate has been revealed on the Internet!

Here is another photo of the bottom of the certificate:



Many blogs are reporting. Here are the ones I have read so far:

A Place to Ask Questions To Get the Right Answers: Breaking News - Picture of Obama's Kenyan Birth Certificate Placed on the Internet

Citizen Wells: Obama Kenyan, Kenyan birth certificate, Orly Taitz, smoking gun, Obama not natural born citizen, Usurper, Mombasa Kenya birth certificate

Original article found at World Net Daily:

WorldNetDaily: BORN IN THE USA?
Is this really smoking gun of Obama's Kenyan birth?
Attorney files motion for authentication of alleged 1960s certificate from Africa

This story is going viral!
Updates forthcoming as they come in!

Hat tips to all links!

*******
Update:

Additional blogs reporting:

The Right Side of Life: Certifigate: Claim: Obama Kenyan Birth Registration? The Saga Continues Lots of details and additional links!

Found the following video via commentator "Sandy" over at Citizen Wells blog:
(Update: Video has been removed)

RepubX: Obama Kenyan Birth Certificate

Logistic Monster.com: Has Obama's Kenyan Birth Certificate Been Found?

The Grand Chess Board

It appears to me that when Obama doesn't have his teleprompter, the comments that he utters during unscripted moments often reveal a lot.

For instance. Listen to this brief video clip of Obama and the game announcers. You will hear Obama "joke" that "we are out of money."

Video Link



No kidding!!

But what is really appalling is the fact that he appears gleeful about it!! Isn't that an awfully strange way for a so-called "president" to act while hundreds of thousands are losing jobs and struggling in this economic recession?

Think about this. Would former President Bush ever have said such a thing? I doubt it.

Obama doesn't appear to have a soul. I mean, he seems almost totally mechanical to me. When he read the teleprompters during his campaign speeches, it was all just scripted for him. None of it was coming from the heart. This is further evidenced by the fact that he has reneged on hundreds of promises he made to We The People while on the campaign trail. People are shaking their heads and wondering, "who is this guy that was elected?"

He doesn't appear to be the same person in office as the one that had campaigned for two years across this nation.

One thing is certain. He's a bold-faced LIAR!!

Since this cold-hearted puppet is being used by his radical Marxist powerful and wealthy puppeteers, Obama is going to attempt to pass two pieces of unnecessary legislation that will bankrupt this country!

For Obama to sit there and joke about this shows evidence that not only does he not care about America or Americans; he is either a stooge puppet for "the powers that be" behind the scenes (see link and article copy coming up) or he is the Hitler dictator of modern times. Maybe it's a little of both?

RepubX has a post up that I think explains what is happening, why it's happening and how and why they are getting away with it.

Can You Hear Me Now?

This article is so good - one that is not to be missed (nor dismissed) that I feel inclined to copy and past the entire post here.

Quote:

Can you hear me now?
by DefendUSx July 14, 2009 00:08

"Can you hear me now??" .. It's what millions of "birthers" have been saying for months, and for some, over a year now. I guess the voice of the Constitution just got a little louder, but still can't quite be heard, yet.

The "hijacking" of the US Government has been long since planned by Marxists like George Soros, and Zbigniew Brzezinski. The fact of this very serious matter is, Obama knows more about the old Russian Constitution then he does the US Constitution. Let me explain.

Obama is recruited at Columbia University by Marxist CIA Officer and Professor

When attending Columbia University as an Indonesian foreign student, Obama was one of eight students recruited by Brzezinski to study "Sovietology". By this time, Brzezinski had worked his way up the ladder in the CIA to become one of its' top officers.

"Brzezinski, a CIA expert on the Soviet Union, teaches international relations and is the head of the Institute for Communist Affairs at Columbia."

Brzezinski wrote a book called "The Grand Chess Board", which is a blueprint for world domination by a one world government, led by he and his Marxist cronies, of course. Using the USA's innovation and wealth, Brzezinski talks about taking over Eurasia and more. Here are some quotes from The Grand Chess Board:

"Ever since the continents started interacting politically, some five hundred years ago, Eurasia has been the center of world power."

"The formulation of a comprehensive and integrated Eurasian geostrategy is therefore the purpose of this book."

"A power that dominates Eurasia would control two of the world's three most advanced and economically productive regions. A mere glance at the map also suggests that control over Eurasia would almost automatically entail Africa's subordination"

"It follows that America's primary interest is to help ensure that no single power comes to control this geopolitical space and that the global community has unhindered financial and economic access to it."

"In the long run, global politics are bound to become increasingly uncongenial to the concentration of hegemonic power in the hands of a single state"

As you can see, Brzezinski is obsessed with getting control of the Middle East (Eurasia) because of all its' resources.

Why Obama was the near perfect choice to implement the final phase of the world agenda

Like Obama said "I am going to change the world" at several speeches during the campaign. He said this because he has been trained to subdue the US by handing her over to the UN, slowly but surely. Everything he does, he has been prepared for in advance by his "handlers", namely, the CIA faction that is partnered with the Tri-lateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations. Each group are partnered towards a common agenda .. a one world order under their management.

Obama was an obvious choice because of a few things and here they are:

*Obama's Grandparents and Mother were already recruited by this CIA faction since Obama's Grandpa worked for David Rockefeller and his "Standard Oil Company" that helped power German Submarines (David was the old guy in the Wheel Chair that appeared in front of Obama on national television recently over Memorial Day.).

*Lolo Soetoro, Obama's stepfather, was a Rockefeller henchman set up in Indonesia under Rocekfeller's Oil front called "Mobil Oil". Obama was purposely schooled in Islam to understand their culture. Nearly Obama's whole life has been "scripted" by his families CIA connections and recruiters. From the movie Total Recall - "Your whole life is just a dream Quade".

*Obama was Black (he has Arab ancestory too, but looks Black) [Christine adds: I have read that Obama is 50% white, 33% Arab and 7% Black African] and had a Muslim name - which his "handlers" had him change to for engaging the Muslim Community. He originally went by "Barry Soetoro" for years, and then changed the name early on when running for political offices. A strategy to lure Muslim countries into the Western World Order paradigm led by these factions/partnerships for a one world order.

Why the records are sealed

Do you now see why Obama has his records sealed and many do not dare confront him on these sensitive issues? The truth is, Obama doesn't even have a lot of the records Americans are requesting. Obama did not teach "Constutional Law" as a Professor at Chicago University. A blatent lie sold to the impressionable. There are no records of him teaching at Chicago as a Professor of Law, and no staff or students remember him. You'll get an "Obot" claiming to remember him, but that is a lame attempt to give credibility to that topic.

No one remembers Obama's birth in Hawaii - the hospital's have no records - zero. His Mother and Grandmother's death - no bodies, and no one remembers Obama's Mom at any hospitals in HI being treated for Cancer. The hospitals have no record of her stay - zero records. Obama's Mother didn't even have Death Certificate until just a couple of months before the election, because someone noticed there was none, and low-and-behold, within a few days she magically had one appear in a database that previously had nothing.

Real-Estate transactions have been found under a known Alias of Stanley A. Dunham as recently has 2008 potentially lending to the family real-estate fraud and transactions using the old Muslim Hiawatha scamming system that is commonly used by many Marxists in the US pretending to be or calling themselves "Philanthropists" - typical "Getting rich off the Poor" predatory lending schemes.

Timothy Geithner and Barry Soetoro - two Puppets in a Pod

Obama's Mother worked for the current Treasury Secretarie's Father - Paul Geithner in Indoensia for the Ford Foundation.

The Obama/Geithner connection:

Peter F. Geithner, Treasury Secretary Geithner's father, worked for the Ford Foundation.

Peter was director of the Asia program at the Ford Foundation, a New World Order (NWO) operation. Peter Geithner oversaw the "microfinance" programs developed in Indonesia by Ann Dunham-Soetoro, Barack Obama’s mother.

Did you know that when Son of Stanley was going to school in Los Angeles, he went with a Pakistani friend to visit his mother in Indonesia, who was working for Peter Geithner at that time. After this, he spent a couple weeks in Pakistan, before he abruptly transferred to Columbia in New York where Peter Geithner was headquartered.

A little more about Peter Geithner and his ties to known NWO operations:

Peter F. Geithner is an advisor to the Asia Center at Harvard University and a consultant to the Asia Pacific Philanthropy Consortium, Rockefeller Foundation, Sasakawa Peace Foundation, and other organizations. He serves on the boards of the National Committee on United States-China Relations, the China Center for Economic Research (Peking University), the Center for the Advanced Study of India (University of Pennsylvania), Clemente (Holdings) Asia, Inc., and the Institute of Current World Affairs.

Do you now see why Timothy Geithner was chosen to be Treasury Secretary? Not because Obama chose him, but because the Federal Reserve and their partners in crime (including that CIA Faction) put him there. Both Timothy and Obama are Puppets because of their family histories and associations with these "Globalists" seeking a one world order in which 20% (they and their partners) would own the other 80%. Timothy, before being posted to Treasury Secretary, was President of the Federal Reserve branch in New York.

The Federal Reserve - the NWO heartbeat "across world nations"

The Federal Reserve is a privately owned conglomerate owned by the banking families of old. A central bank that networks with other central banks in other countries set up by these families and their partners to control monetary policies of said country.

Timothy has been instructed by the board of Central Banks (International Bank of Settlements) to destroy the US dollar by spending it into inflation oblivion, thus paving the way for the grand excuse in forming the North American Union by 2010 by way of a second and final economic blowout.

Obama is there to form a dictatorship using Marxist principals as to take the US out of the equation for disrupting New World Order objectives. /quote

*******

Note these comments:

Zbig and Henry have been at the forefront of planning WW3 since the 1960s. And in bringing the US down to third world status which is what NAFTA, GATT, The WTO, APEC, and the Trilat. goals were and are all about. The entire Western World has been inculcated with Cultural Marxism since that time. Which is why the PC aspect of Marxism has become entrenched in the West to the point of Orwellian Hate Crime and Thought Crime legislation being passed without much resistance.


Messenger

WHEN WILL MORE AMERICANS WAKE UP AND FIGHT AGAINST THIS????

I agree with Elizabeth:

Excellent article! We can only pray that Judge Carter is for real, the truth comes out, and it brings Obama down. That certainly would put a huge wrinkle in their plans...maybe enough to derail it.

You know, after 9/11, the country was united and stood together. It has been almost 8 years and some of these same people have become complacent. I do think that Obama disastrous decisions and the country's sad state of affairs is in the process of waking a sleeping giant. Millions of people are taking notice...hopefully it's not too late.


Elisabeth

Hat tip:

RepubX

*******
Update:

Just in case you need more proof that ObamaFRAUD is inflicting Communist/Dictatorship government upon the United States of America, read the following from "The Obama File":

Questions Raised Over Influence Of Obama Czars


Obama might have slipped Monday, when he introduced Gil Kerlikowske as his "drug czar" while speaking to an urban policy group in Washington.

Kerlikowske's real title is director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. The administration generally rejects the term "czar" as a media-generated buzzword.

But as the so-called "czars" keep piling up, it's raising serious questions about how powerful these White House insiders are and seems to make the term "czar" all the more appropriate.

By some accounts, there are close to three dozen czars in the Obama administration, managing everything from closing the Guantanamo Bay detention facility to ending the genocide in Darfur.

With Steve Rattner leaving as head of the administration's auto task force, just days after General Motors emerged from bankruptcy, America will get a new auto czar -- former steelworkers union official Ron Bloom.

The White House routinely fends off claims that Obama has named too many czars.

But what is a czar?

Continue reading here . . .

I believe Obama's czars are political officers. In the old Soviet Union they were called commissars.

Their function is to advance Obama's agenda across the traditional, hierarchical departments of the Executive Branch.

They take their orders directly from Obama and they report directly to him. No one knows anything about their budgets or their staffing.

States Are Saying - Don't Tread On Us!

The Right Side of Life: States Formally Declare: Don’t Tread On Us!

Excerpt:

The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution expressly reserves all powers to the states which are not delegated to the federal government. Over the course of decades, there have been increasing federal mandates and acts designed to effectively step in and legislate the affairs of our various states from Washington D.C.

Federal usurpation into state affairs severely limits the ability of state governments to operate according to their citizens’ wishes. We believe that the best government is one which governs closer to the people.

As of this announcement, legislatures in nine states’ have acted on bi-partisan support and have passed their respective resolutions to affirm states’ rights. These are: Alaska (HJR27), Georgia (SR632), Idaho (HJM4), Indiana (SR42), Missouri (HCR13), North Dakota (HCR3063), Oklahoma (HJR1003), South Carolina (H3509) and South Dakota (HCR1013).

It appears that there are 25 more states which presently have similar resolutions pending.

The current price of erosion of states’ rights exceeds $11 trillion. Without the countless attempts in Washington to duplicate and micromanage our states’ affairs, much of this debt could have been avoided.

It is our sincere desire that each of you sees this popular issue as a means to more effectively carry out your duties to the citizens you work so hard to represent. We call on you to join us so that, together, we can make a difference.

Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions or to discuss how our states can work together to bring back government closer to the people.

Heard about this on Glenn Beck’s show, May 7th. What GREAT NEWS!! It’s about time that WE THE PEOPLE in the states DO SOMETHING about this awful power grab that usurper ObamaFRAUD and his cohorts are wielding in this nation!

Hat Tip:

The Right Side of Life

The Real Story Behind Scare Force One

DefendUSx has a post up that reveals the real story behind the Scare Force One scandal!

An Ominous Battle Going On Between the Obama Admin. and the U.S. Military - the Real Reason for Scare Force One

Did anyone really believe the "photo op" excuse anyway??

I think that the internal struggle going on (as revealed in the story at the link) and the external struggle against the awful, dangerous, anti-American policies of this Bogus Potus and his cronies will bring forth millions more American Patriots who will continue to fight to get their country back!!! Eventually, this usurper will be totally exposed as the radical that he is and We The People Patriots will be victorious in the end!!!

I pray to God that We The People will win this fight!!!

Hat Tip:

DefendUSx at Repub X Blog

*******
Recall how vague gabby Gibby was about the incident until he was told what to say? People...their "official" story is just not plausible! I sincerely hope that the aide spills the beans about it and testifies in court some day against this Resident liar!

White House Aide Resigns Over Flyover Flap

*******

The Obama File doesn't think that the "official" story is plausible, either!

The Air Farce One Report -- A Classic Case Of Misdirection

*******

Obama File: Obama Air Farce One

Notice what is written at the bottom of the Obama File entry:

Freedom Watch, a public interest watchdog, has filed Freedom of Information Act requests with the Obama administration demanding that it make public government videos of the NYC flyover by President Obama's plane.

Freedom Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman said Obama had no qualms about releasing detailed memos last month describing interrogation techniques used by the CIA, so the administration shouldn't have reservations about releasing the flyover video as well.

President Obama thinks it cool to release national intelligence documents concerning American intelligence gathering techniques of terrorists," Klayman said, "but ironically terrorizes the people of Manhattan, who have the tragedy of September 11 emblazoned in their emotional psyches, but then refuses to release benign video of his own incompetence and lack of national security common sense."

Klayman said, "There's honestly something that we're not being told," he said. "Why were they flying over New York City? It's very strange. It makes no sense. Why would you need Air Force One for a photo-op?"Klayman said Freedom Watch will not back down until the truth about the exercise is fully exposed. "

If indeed this is just a snafu, it shows the incredible national security incompetence of the Obama administration," he said. "But the government releases whatever it wants to release. It's never really constrained by national security because it does whatever is in its own interest. Obviously it's not in the Obama administration's interest to tell the truth."



*******
Update 5/11/09

It has become apparent that the Scare Force One photo released by the NOBama Admin. is actually a photoshop job!!

Texas Darlin: Exclusive - Air Force One Flyover Pic Photoshopped

More lies from the most unethical, corrupt and evil admin. ever!

Obama's Staged Press Conference - No Accountability

Did you see that sham of a "press conference" that Obama held yesterday? How lame can this idiot get? With each passing day, his antics get worse and worse and our nation is suffering because of it. Did you notice what was not covered? Did you notice how Obama bloviates when answering questions? It's all planned that way. Yup! The more time he spends yapping, the less questions he has to answer. How many did he answer? Was it about 13 or 14?

In an analysis following the bogus conference, Bill O'Reilly mentioned that he got in about 45 questions in his 30 minute interview with Obama back during the campaign. And...notice that Obama selected certain reporters - most likely ahead of time - as he looked down and referred to his list. I would not be a bit surprised if he knew the questions ahead of time so he would have prepared answers. What's more did you notice the softball questions that were asked? Why didn't anyone bring up the low-flying plane over New York incident? - [LINK UPDATED] Why did Obama find it necessary to spend over $300,000.00 of taxpayer money to do a dumb town hall meeting in St. Louis, MO and at the same time mock the TEA Party participants while there? I could go on and on - but you already get the picture. These so-called news conferences ARE BOGUS BECAUSE THEY ARE STAGED!!

I was hoping to find a video that shows what a lying campaigner Barack Hussein Obama was as he and the DNC hijacked and usurped the presidency. Thanks to Nice Deb, I found one this morning. It is not entirely complete - there are SO MANY MORE SCANDALS, errors, faux pas, stupid moves, horrible executive orders, terrible decisions etc. that could be mentioned. In fact, you can read about most of them here, here or here. Those links are just a few locations where you will find the truth about this despicable person and his evil cronies. But seeing this brief video of Obama saying one thing on the campaign trail, and doing quite the opposite once in office is very telling of what a narcissistic liar the man is. There is no other way to see it. Obama IS A LIAR!!

Suffice it to say that the normal, grassroots efforts by everyday Americans who gathered for the TEA (Taxed Enough Already) Parties across the nation have been given PLENTY of reasons to protest the bailouts, porkulus spending, scandals and all the rest (see list above) of the nonsense that this Bogus Potus and his awful administration has inflicted upon the us, the Citizens of the United States of America.

Here's the video:

Video Link: Barack Obama - 100 Days of No Accountability


Hat Tips:

The Obama File

Expose Obama

Nice Deb

*******
Also see:

Newsmax: Obama's Gaffes and Gimmicks

But Now, The Serious News Roundup (Eve Update)

A Place to Ask Questions To Get the Right Answers: Activity in Kerchner v. Obama Case - Motion to Extend Time, Move, or Otherwise Respond & Declaration of Counsel Filed By Defendents

Excerpt:

The defendants have already had over two months to answer, move, or otherwise respond. As of the current deadline of May 5th they will have had 75 days from the time they were served to respond. In our opinion, that is an adequate amount of time to answer or move or other wise respond. An objection will be filed to this second request by the defendants for a further extension of time.

How many ways can they continue to stall the inevitable?

Plus, to keep updated on all that is going on in the eligibility cases, see the dozens of post over at On The Right Side of Life- ESPECIALLY the following article that was posted on Sunday:

TulsaToday: “Obama’s First 100 Days in Trust”

And don't miss The New York Post: 100 days, 100 mistakes for Barack Obama

I wonder how many people are now realizing how very badly they were duped into voting for the usurper? How many are now seeing that the Lamestream Media will continue to prop up this teleprompter reading dummy and make it seem like his first 100 days have been successful?

Even other countries have noticed Obama's stupidity and incompetence!

Obama makes former President Bush look like a genius in comparison! Of course all presidents make mistakes. No president is perfect (Reagan was close and we now realize, more than ever, what a gem we had when he was our President!!!) but dare I say that Obama shows every indication that he is PURPOSELY TRYING TO DESTROY AMERICA!

On The Right Side of Life blog owner, Phil, has included commentary at the end of his post (above link) that reveals how obvious this is becoming. The proper name for Obama's terrible actions is called TREASON! Here's a copy of Phil's commentary:

Suffice it to say that issues such as eligibility are not going away. Furthermore, it is equally true and, I would wager, even more so if, in fact, this President truly does decide to shut down Guantanamo Bay, CIA “black” holding sites around the world, and otherwise continues to both signal and act in a way that severly diminishes America’s ability to protect and defend herself against her enemies, he will work this country towards being exceptionally exposed to attack.

And please do be aware of that, my fellow readers. While there is a difference between having an adversary (someone who merely disagrees with your stances) and having an enemy (someone who doesn’t just disagree with your viewpoint but is acting in some way to either specifically encumber you or, worse, destroy you), America doesn’t just exist because pieces of paper such as the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution say that it should.

Remember: any law that people make must be enforced. Otherwise, it is merely writing on a piece of paper that simply sounds good, chock full of good intentions. Laws must be enforced and, ultimately, the awesomely effective and efficient forces of the American military are her greatest offense and defense against her enemies.

Not only this, but whether the issue is eligibility or some other wrong that has been hoisted upon the American People and States can be quite easily rectified via the Bill of Rights. It must be understood by all that only States and the American People have rights; the federal government has none. The federal government only has those powers and authority specifically and expressly enumerated within the Constitution; any and all other such powers and authority are reserved to the States or the People to carry out.

Anyone is completely within their right to question their elected leadership anything they wish for the truth. To suggest that any such questioning is wrong or should be condemned is, in my opinion, being unpatriotic (after all, how else is one to hold those who govern us into account?) and being essentially treasonous.

“But, Phil, that’s such a strong word. How can someone be ‘treasonous’ if they’re saying that either you shouldn’t question politicians or that you’re wrong for doing so?” Quite simply, if the American People see wrongdoing on behalf of their elected leaders, and if the federal government will do nothing about it, and if the States aren’t doing anything about it, then, per the Bill of Rights — specifically the 10th Amendment — it is the obligation of the People to uphold the Constitution.

If the People do not uphold the Constitution against elected leaders who are acting unconstitutionally, then it is the People who are actually being treasonous, because it is expressly within their right to do so and subsequently can only blame themselves for such unconstitutional failings.

Even worse, when — not if — another terrorist attack befalls our great country, those who have not held their elected officials to account will have the blood of fellow Americans on their hands.

I think America’s founding fathers were absolutely serious about the type of government they were intending to form. It is the greatest and most demonstrative form of individual government ever created. Yet, if we, the People do not question for the truth, that government shall surely begin the process of disappearing from the earth.

Fortunately, there is a growing number of American citizens who are going to do everything in our collective power to make sure that doesn’t happen.

Hat Tips:

A Place to Ask Questions To Get the Right Answers

The New York Post: 100 days, 100 mistakes for Barack Obama

On The Right Side of Life

*******
Update:

Nice Deb: Pakistans President Say Bin Laden Could be Dead

Assorted bloggers and military analysts have been saying this for years, but this is the first time I’ve heard it from a Pakistani leader.

I have been one of the bloggers who has thought that Bin Laden has been dead for years.

Former posts:

Ex-Taliban Militants Story Sounds Fishy

I still think that Bin Hidin' has Bin Dead since August or September of 2006. Wouldn't it have been poetic justice if he died on September 11th? I know. More speculation. Since the classified French report was leaked sometime about Sept. 23rd, it is more likely that the monstermind would have died closer to that date.It's just too much of a coincidence that the Taliban held such a huge funeral in Sept. 2006 if Bin Hidin' was still alive.

See the following former posts:

Is Bin Laden Dead?Is Zawahiri the "Big Kahuna" Now?
Osama Bin Dead Still Propagandizing

Additional links:

Michele Malkin's "What the...?!!!!Stop the ACLU's Osama Bin Laden Dead? (tons of additional links)

TownHall's - AP France Unconfirmed Report: Osama bin Laden Dead? (Update: Saudi Sources Say He's Very Ill) (more links there, too)

*******
Update at 7:48 p.m. PT

Some post links from my reading list that you must read!!!

Swine Flu Vaccination Propaganda from 1976
posted by evil@evilconservativeonline.com (Evil Conservative) at Evil Conservative Radio - 37 minutes ago

Here's an interesting collection of videos from the Swine Flu Pandemic Panic of 1976. All outbreaks of new flu strains have the potential to become serious threats... but then so do a lot of things. To wat...

*******
The following is the absolute worst!!! Horrible!! Heartbreaking! Disgusting!! and typical of the evil Islamic cult-of-death terrorist mindset!!!

Terrorist Mommy Blows Herself Up With Toddler In Emergency Food Line
posted by Gateway Pundit at Gateway Pundit - 1 hour ago

While the American media was focusing on prosecuting the Bush regime for splashing water on terrorists, they missed this story. An Iraqi mommy with her toddler blew up in an emergency food line in Iraq th...

*******

Wiretaps go mobile to catch cell conversations
posted by thejetman1.nospam@nospam.hotmail.com (defendusx) at Repubx - 2 hours ago

WASHINGTON -- Law enforcement has gone mobile in its pursuit of wiretaps, as more Americans rely on their cell phones to communicate even in possibly criminal cases. A report issued Monday shows that 94 ...

*******

FAA Memo: Feds Knew NYC Flyover Would Cause Panic
posted by thejetman1.nospam@nospam.hotmail.com (defendusx) at Repubx - 2 hours ago

Threatened Federal Sanctions Against NYPD, Secret Service, FBI & Mayor's Office If Secret Ever Got Out A furious USurper Barack Obama ordered an internal review (internal - of course!) of Monday's low-fl...

*******

Albert Mohler’s finest

posted by gcmwatch at Gay Christian Movement Watch - 2 hours ago
I had been meaning to get to this. Its Albert Mohler’s post No Truth Without Love, No Love Without Truth. It should be supersized, framed and hung in the foyer of every church in America. The times demand ...

*******

FAA Memo: Feds Knew Flyover Would Cause Panic-- Did It Anyway!
posted by Gateway Pundit at Gateway Pundit - 2 hours ago

White House officials knew that the flyover New York City would cause a panic but did it anyway. The White House officials also ordered the flyover be kept secret. The flyover caused a panic in the street...

*******

The Annihilation of Marriage-Part One
posted by Alan Keyes at Alan Keyes is LOYAL TO LIBERTY - 4 hours ago

Yesterday Iowa became the third state in the Union where individuals can receive a legal document purporting to confer on two people of the same sex the legal status of a married couple. A combination of...

*******

Iraqi Government Releases Photo of Captured Al-Qaeda Leader
posted by Gateway Pundit at Gateway Pundit - 4 hours ago

Undated handout released April 28, 2009, shows Abu Omar al-Baghdadi. Iraq has confirmed the identity of a suspect captured last week as Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, believed to be head of the Islamic State of Ir...

*******

HAPPY BIRTHDAY, ISRAEL
posted by joelcrosenberg at Joel Rosenberg's Weblog - 7 hours ago

On the Western calendar, Israel was reborn as a nation on May 14, 1948. But today marks the 61st birthday of the modern Jewish State on the Jewish calendar. Let us be praying for the peace of Jerusalem an...

*******

Good Riddance, RINO
posted by nicedeb at Nice Deb - 7 hours ago

I’m not too broken up about this. The Dems had the “whole 60-vote fillibuster-proof majority thing” even when he was with us. Thanks to TOTUS for the ’shop. Related: I see IOWNTHEWORLD is having a little b...

*******

After 100 Days... Obama Is the Second Most Reviled President in 40 Years
posted by Gateway Pundit at Gateway Pundit - 8 hours ago

*The radical Barack Obama ran as a moderate.* At each of the three presidential debates he promised to cut the US deficit. *Instead,* Obama will quadruple the deficit this year. If you look past his cheerl...

*******

Showing His True Colors
posted by Matt W. at Thoughts, Commentary, and other various ramblings. - 8 hours ago

Many of us have been trying to get the point across for some time now that just because some politicians call themselves Republicans does not meant that they actually ascribe to classic Republican values, ...

Obama's Unreciprocated Bow is Gesture of Subservience

Yesterday, I noticed that Alan Keyes was one of the first to blog about our usurper Resident Obama "bowing" before the Saudi king. Obama’s Bow- Protocol nod or wink of appeasement? Go to the link and see the photo and video in the sidebar. I just can't even bring myself to post it here.

My comment there:

Good post and excellent point, Dr. Keyes. I may have missed it, but I do not think that the video showed any of the other leaders bowing to the Saudi king.

How frightening it is to see how far we have come from "the American custom of refusing to bow or salute any foreign monarch" symbol of allegiance to America and the sovereignty policies from the past.

So many Americans are ignorant (unfortunately) about how certain acts look to the Arab and Muslim world. They might dismiss your very valid concerns here and claim that Obama was just being "respectful." Yeah...right.

When Obama made the mistake of saying he had visited "all 57 states" while campaigning for the presidential election, how many people in America realized that there are 57 Arab/Muslim states? And, recall his interview with George Stephanopoulos (sp?) where Obama stated, "my Muslim faith." No Christian that I know would ever have made such a mistake. Not even close. It was dismissed as a "slip of the tongue," but was it really?

My plan was to share the links to blog posts about this that I have since found in my sidebar. Instead, take a look at how many blogs are discussing this issue via this search titled, Obama bows to Saudi king.

There are probably hundreds, if not thousands of blog posts about this. However, I was curious to see what Jihad Watch had to say. They have the video up and have stated:

Breach of protocol. "Americans do not bow to foreign monarchs because that act signified the monarch's power over his subjects."

"Obama bows down to Saudi King (updated)," by Clarice Feldman at The American Thinker, April 2 (thanks to Doc Washburn):

[...] See Miss Manners on the protocol. Americans do not bow to foreign monarchs because that act signified the monarch's power over his subjects.

Is the Lamestream media reporting on this? I haven't turned on my T.V. yet today. Somehow, I doubt that they will share the concern that such an act brings to the minds of American Patriots. I doubt that they will share that such submission shown to this Saudi king is not only a breach of protocol but may symbolize something far worse in our Usurper-in-chief.

Time to read the American Thinker link.

That link led to another American Thinker post: With bowed head and bended knee.

Conclusion at that link:

The old saying that one picture is worth a thousand words is actually amplified when it comes to cross-cultural communication. I have little doubt that the Muslim world's media will not be as circumspect as their American mainstream colleagues in displaying the demi-prostration of the American leader carrying the name Hussein to the guardian of Islam's holiest cities.


Until evidence is produced that Barack Obama habitually bows and bends his knee before others, I will have to assume that he meant this gesture to carry meaning. It is simply amazing to me that our media will not even present this image to the American public.


Thomas Lifson is editor and publisher of American Thinker.

Check back for updates.

Hat Tips:

Alan Keyes blog

Jihad Watch

With bowed head and bended knee

*******

Ahhh! I ended up being quite busy today, so forgive me for not including many updates. The following are some comments that I accumulated while reading over at American Thinker. I haven't gotten through them all (last I checked there were several pages with over 250 comments!) however, these were the specific ones that I picked out while reading the first few pages:

Quoted comments:

ender Wrote:

Is anyone watching this? He is speaking at the G20
summit, taking questions from the press. He
appears to be cracking up, melting right in front
of my eyes. Stuttering, losing focus. It's painful
to watch.
Taking forever .... to say nothing. He sneezes and
loses his train of thought.
Ugh

UPDATE: So now he goes off the prepared list of
reporters questions and takes random questions. He
says he'll take a question from a "foreigner" -
realizes his gaffe and says ...." I am the
foreigner".

He says he doesn't want to be accused of gender
bias (ha ha) and he picks a woman whom I believe
he thinks is a Muslim. She's not. She's an Indian
and asks O, when he met with the Indian Prime
Minister, what was discussed to fight the
terrorism against India coming from Pakistan
(Bingo!).

Obama can't answer. Starts to compliment the
magnificence of the Indian prime minister, and she
agrees. The crowd doesn't like that the journalist
supports her PM - Obama shoots back, did you have
something to do with him getting elected? (Strange
is not the word.) And then says, just kidding.

As if the media didn't put the Mansourian
candidate in the White House.

He avoids answering ...........stutters, talks
about many things and then goes off on carbon
footprints. I kid you not. If anyone grabs a video
of that exchange, please forward.

[atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com]
09/04/obama-bows-and-kisses-the-of-saudi-king.html
#comments

· His first phone call was to Abbas, the terrorist
leader of the Palestinian Authority and al Fatah;

· His first interview was on al-Arabiya News
Channel, where he apologized for the United
States;

· His first appointment of an envoy to Syria was
the appointment of George Soros;

· He bankrolled Hamas out of Whitehouse funds to
the tune of $23 million, following Israel’s
invasion of Gaza to stop the missile strikes;

· He promised another 900 million to Gaza;

· He immediately adopted the Saudi Plan as policy
for Israel, which favors a contiguous Palestinian
state (that is, a geographic area that connects
Gaza with the West Bank and includes Jerusalem –
necessarily dividing Israel);

· He dismissed charges against the perpetrators of
the bombing of the USS Cole;

· He announced the shut-down of Gitmo, and
apologized to the Islamic world for its
existence;

· He announced that his first summit would be an
Islamic summit;

· He turned a blind eye to Iran’s launch of a
satellite capable of triangulating coordinates for
ICBMs that Iran is furiously trying to develop for
the delivery of nuclear weapons;

· He turned a blind eye to the release of A. Q.
Khan, Pakistan’s top nuclear scientist, who is
believed to be the very person to have delivered
nuclear bomb technology to North Korea;

· He intends to eliminate our anti-ballistic
missile defense program;

· He intends to reduce our nuclear weapons arsenal
by 75%;

· He intends to reduce our military budget by
25%;

· He has reneged on developing nuclear power;

· He continues to block off-shore or expanded
drilling;

· He continues to try and block the production of
coal (45% of our electric generating capability)

So who's side is this guy on?

[www.chiaobama.com]

Ender, your compilation of our traitor presidents deeds is unbelievable and outrageous. Thanks for updating us on what an imbecile our president is! GOD save us from this doofus!!!

*******
daveinboca Wrote:

Back when I was the only Arabist in the American
Embassy, I had to translate a conversation between
then-Crown Prince Abdullah and the American
Ambassador. The protocol has always been in the
many meetings between American POTUSes and any
king, emperor, or Dalai Lama or Pope has been a
slight nod of deference at the very most while
shaking the dignitary's hand. Another [blank]-up by
Hillary's State Dept.

FDR met King Abdul-Aziz in 1945 just after Yalta
and since then, every POTUS except HST & JFK have
met Saudi monarchs. Never has one done anything
approaching the near genuflection that the Won
displayed at the G-20, not even Jimmy Carter, who
famously left his personal briefing book behind
when he visited the King during a visit in
1977---an [blank]-up of hilarious proportions

Another [blank]-up by Hillary's State Dept. Welcome
back, Carter!


Dave, you are only going to wish Obambi was another Carter. He is ten times worse!!

*******

Posted by: omg
Apr 03, 07:36 AM





I've called 10 REPUBLICAN congressman in the House and asked them to start impeachment. their staff listened sympathetically, but more importantly they said they are receiving hundreds of calls each week with same request. so my idea is if each one of us called 10 congressman and made a list of who we contacted ,,,,we could have some impact

*******

Posted by: liberty4usa
Apr 03, 10:05 AM

I cannot imagine the leader of the most powerful nation on earth could disgrace our country in this way unless he truly despised our position in the world.

Our media knows the symbolic significance of this- yet stands in allegiance to him. On January 20th the world became a very dangerous place compared to the day before, which was already dangerous, this gesture of subservience is a disgrace on a scale unimaginable.

The credibility of Sharia in the Muslim world must be skyrocketing today while the gaping vulnerability of the wrong person as US president is not lost on any friend or foe of America.

*******

Posted by: Observer 99
Apr 02, 11:12 PM

President Obama is on thin ice already. After just a few weeks in office he has made a series of embarrassing and unacceptable foreign affairs gaffes. It began when he insulted the Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso by not giving him a full joint press conference with flags. He repeated this mistake when he insulted the British Prime Minister Gordon Brown not long after. Not only did he deny the British PM a proper joint press conference but he also insulted him again with his thoughtless gift of 25 DVDs. The British PM gave Obama a pen holder carved from the wood of HMS Gannet - a Royal Navy anti-slavery ship, its commissioning
certificate and a first edition of a famous Churchill biography. In return,
Obama gave Brown 25 DVDs which do not even play on British machines.

To add insult to injury, the Obamas continued on their gaffe-strewn path to infamy when they visited the Queen at Buckingham Palace and Michelle Obama put her arm round the Queen and hugged her, which is not protocol at all. Then, President Obama bows to the King of Saudi Arabia, apparently without the faintest idea how this gesture would be received throughout the United States and the wider world.

It seems to clear that in 2010 the people of the United States owe it to
themselves to put GOP majorities in both the House and the Senate, and then in 2012 consign this one-term president to the same historical chapter as Buchanan, Harding and Carter before any more damage can be done.

*******

Posted by: Annette
Apr 03, 06:27 AM

J A L Wrote:

Annette Wrote:

----- Good points JAL!
Is this any worse than Bush holding his hand?


Yes Annette, it is much worse.
President Bush walked alongside the Saudi king,
holding his hand. This was a gesture of friendship
between equals; mutual respect between the leaders
of their respective countries.
Barack Obama hurried across the room to grab the
king's hand and bowed low to him. They did not bow
to each other; indeed, the king did not even
return the bow. This is an appropriate exchange
between a servant and his master, a child and an
adult, or an inferior nation to a superior.
That uncultured fool demeaned his office and
disrespected every American living and dead by
abasing himself before the house of Saud.

*******

Posted by: Barry in Australia
Apr 02, 09:29 PM

i find this really quite disturbing and quite illuminating.I cannot believe this was a mistake,this was Obama bowing or if you like grovelling at the feet of a Islamic King.He did not bow to the Queen of England,oh no...only to his Islamic King.
Note Obama also met and spoke in Indonesian with the President of Indonesia and has committed to visiting Indonesia later this year the most populous Islamic state on earth.
Is this the "new world order" Obama speaks about so often now?
I feel sorry for my many friends in the US,you have been charmed by the greatest snake oil salesman since PT Barnum.
Be very careful America,be very careful,this man has another agenda!

*******
Posted by: halara
Apr 02, 09:25 PM

TAQIYYA ...he's no Dhimmi, he's taqiyya..

[www.islam-watch.org]

*******

Posted by: Sage1505
Apr 02, 08:31 PM

I agree with Caolila. I have been pointing out this idiots socialistic ways and the policies his goons in Washingon are pushing through Congress and the House and the uninformed who put this fool in office cannot see the trees for the forest because they are all too busy watching American Idol and Dancing with the Stars to watch the news, read the paper and research what this traitor is doing to our country at lightening speed.


caolila Wrote:

Really what can we expect when these folks paid
for his education and funded his campaign
illegally? Of course he has to bow to them in
person. I am sure it is part of muslim culture of
respect and honor.

The dummies are the american people who ensured he
got elected. Our education system and culture
ensured these kids had such poor critical thinking
skills, and such short attention spans, they
simply could not (or would not) research the
truth.

Now the rest of us are stuck in this mess.

The only way out is to force disclosure of his
birth certificate and Occidental school records.
It's overwhelminging likely that those documents
will be his undoing.

*******

Posted by: pmk
Apr 02, 04:18 PM

Annette Wrote:
Is this any worse than Bush holding his hand?
Two possible answers here:

1. Bush wasn't being subservient by holding the man's hand while they walked.
Obama wasn't shaking his hand. He bent down to kiss it. What other head of state, in any western country, does that?

2. If liberals were so upset at Bush then where is their pique with Obama?

The State Dept's protocol guidelines recommend that you check the cultural practices of the other country. This didn't take place in Saudi Arabia. What was done is not common cultural practice in London. When in Rome, do as the Romans do. Obama wasn't in Riyadh. /quote