Showing posts with label gun rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gun rights. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 03, 2013

Our Current Financial Situation Was Not Bred Out of Incompetence, But by Design

If I wanted to take a survey of the kinds of Americans there are today, the following might be just a start in accurately describing them.  No, I'm not talking about race, gender, ideology, political affiliation, or even religious adherence.  I'm talking about those who see the truth about what is going on here in America and around the world, those who don't see the truth [and/or refuse to see it] regarding what is going on here in America and around the world, those who don't want to know the truth about what is going on in America and around the world, those who scoff at the truth and may simply label those who think that way as "conspiracy theorists" regarding what is going on here in America and around the world, those who deem themselves too "intellectual" to see the truth about what is going on here in America and around the world, and those who have to humbly admit to being too ignorant [and/or uninformed] to see the truth about what is going on here in America and around the world.

Feel free to add additional categories.  I'm sure there are more.  If anyone is bold enough to honestly take the survey, perhaps I will add to the survey choices in the near future.

First, your assignment is to read the following article:

Canada Free Press: DHS Insider update: It has begun. Our current financial situation was not bred out of incompetence, but by design.

After reading it, ask yourself why Obama is touring the country (and spending millions to do so) spewing rhetoric about gun control (excuse me, that should actually read PEOPLE CONTROL) laws. 

Look at the current threat coming out of North Korea!  Is it a ruse?  Is it a kind of "hissy fit" from a young 28-year-old dictator?  Or is it a genuine nuclear threat against our nation and South Korea?  If it is a grave threat, why would Obama be so continually interested in gun control/people control laws?  Why isn't he focusing on the economy, working to get new jobs (like approving the Keystone Pipeline, for starters) for the American people instead of keeping them under that slavery of government hand-outs like food stamps, unemployment, disability and other types of "Obama free phone" hand-outs?  I realize that some people desperately need the help.  But there are probably billions of dollars of fraud within every one of those programs!  So why aren't there any investigations to counter and stop such fraud?  People could be hired to find the waste, fraud, and abuse and be paid from the money saved!

I could go on and on with many pages of examples.

Money is being printed at an alarming rate with apparently no fear of higher inflation.  The national debt continues to soar, while Obama and his ilk try to fool the American people into thinking it's harmful to cut spending.  If so, why did he and his family take 3-4 vacations over the past 3 months that cost the American taxpayers billions of dollars (while closing the White House to children going on field trips from their schools)?  Why did Joe Biden spend a million dollars on hotel rooms in Paris?

What is wrong with this picture, folks???

It is because this is all being done by design - just as Mr. Doug Hagmann points out in his article (link above).

So, read the article and then place yourself in one of the following categories:

1.  I see the truth about what is going on here in America and around the world.

2.  I don't see the truth [and/or refuse to see it] regarding what is going on here in America and around the world.

3.  I don't want to know the truth about what is going on in America and around the world.

4.  I scoff at the truth and label those who think that way as a  "conspiracy theorists" regarding what is going on here in America and around the world.

5.  I deem myself to "intellectual" to see the "so-called" truth [and don't believe it anyway - no matter how much proof is given] about what is going on in America and around the world.

6.  I humbly admit to being too ignorant [and/or uninformed] to see the truth about what is going on here in America and around the world.

7.  Other [please elaborate].

*******

Hat tip: Canada Free Press

Oh, and if that one article isn't enough to convince you of the truth, then I encourage you to read Mr. Hagmann's additional articles available HERE.

Talk Wisdom Reports...You Decide.

*******

Oh heck...decided to post the most recent article links here too:


North Korea: The larger picture - Apr 2, 2013

Intelligence insider: Obama administration agenda to “kill U.S Dollar” - Apr 1, 2013

We will be judged by our silence - Mar 28, 2013

Disarming American citizens, Obama style - Mar 19, 2013

DHS Insider update: It has begun - Mar 19, 2013

The grand illusion of partisan politics - Mar 13, 2013

Surviving the coming collapse - Mar 12, 2013

Racing for the exits - Mar 8, 2013

The architects of our economic demise - Feb 28, 2013

Brennan: from Barack to Benghazi - Feb 22, 2013

America Over a Barrel - Feb 20, 2013

Goodbye, to my best friend - Feb 15, 2013

Sign of a financial Armageddon? - Feb 8, 2013

DHS Insider: Obama’s cyber warriors & preparing for collapse - Feb 7, 2013

Running down the clock on Benghazi - Jan 24, 2013

Understanding the Obama conspiracy & U.S. takeover - Jan 17, 2013

It’s about more than guns - Jan 11, 2013

Flashing red lies of Benghazi - Jan 9, 2013

It’s time we became leaders - Jan 2, 2013

Savage behavior - Dec 29, 2012

The latest from “DHS Insider” - Dec 27, 2012

Flight of the U.S.A. - Dec 24, 2012

The wretched absurdity of the Benghazi report - Dec 20, 2012

Confronting our spiritual bankruptcy - Dec 17, 2012

Benghazi explained: Interview with an “Intelligence Insider” (Part III) - Dec 12, 2012

Health info collected to “protect the President” - Dec 6, 2012

Chemical weapons reports in Syria, exactly as warned - Dec 5, 2012

Benghazi explained: Behind the lies - Dec 4, 2012

Benghazi: Behind the scenes (Part II) - Nov 30, 2012

Benghazi explained: Interview with an “Intelligence Insider” - Nov 29, 2012

Obama’s memo on “insider threats” - Nov 27, 2012

Thanksgiving 2012; Reaping a bitter harvest? - Nov 23, 2012

The alligator at our door - Nov 15, 2012

Sex, lies and Obama Ben Ghazi - Nov 14, 2012

Cover-up at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue - Nov 12, 2012

Turning a political decision into your spiritual mandate - Nov 8, 2012

Obama’s real world game of Risk - Nov 6, 2012

Abandoning America’s honor - Nov 2, 2012

Obama’s October surprise - exposed by Benghazi? - Oct 30, 2012

The hidden real truth about Benghazi - Oct 28, 2012

Death Race Damascus: “13 days in October” - Oct 23, 2012

“Sir, you must come with us” - Oct 16, 2012

Something in the air - Oct 15, 2012

Lemmings… At the precipice of WWIII - Oct 9, 2012

Body of lies from Benghazi to Barack - Sep 25, 2012

Real Story behind “Innocence of Muslims” on the Hagmann & Hagmann Report - Sep 23, 2012

The greatest fraud in history - Sep 19, 2012

Ambassador Stevens & the Scorpion - Sep 17, 2012

Middle East Analysis: WWIII fuse has been lit - Sep 16, 2012

Beyond politics - Sep 9, 2012

DHS Source: “It’s going hot” - Aug 29, 2012

Guns N’ Rose colored deals - Aug 24, 2012

Psychiatry as a weapon to silence religious and political opposition - Aug 24, 2012

Of Obama, Christians and crucifixions - Aug 21, 2012

Accidental death or something more? - Aug 20, 2012

Christianity & gun owners in the crosshairs: Chilling tactic exposed - Aug 17, 2012

Steve Quayle tonight on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report - Aug 11, 2012

Barry Soetoro, the Invisible Man - Aug 10, 2012

Behind the scenes: Obama and the NDAA - Aug 8, 2012

Disarming America - Aug 7, 2012

Serious questions surround Colorado shooting - Jul 30, 2012

Peering into Pandora’s box - Jul 29, 2012

From Arab Spring to the coming nuclear winter - Jul 26, 2012

Soetoro’s 2012 election contingency - Jul 22, 2012

The biggest financial fraud in history receives scant media attention - Jul 10, 2012

Saturday, February 23, 2013

Say NO To Socialism!! [Updates]

communist obama marxist socialist maoist progressive
 
Hat Tip: 
 
If you attend a rally, please feel free to share your experience and links to photos of the event here!
 
~  Christine

 
Rally
Sites
Nice Deb reports:
Day of Resistance: 200 – 250 People Protest Government Overreach in Joplin, MO
nicedeb at Nice Deb - 1 day ago

Due to a busy Saturday schedule, I wasn’t able to make it to the Day of Resistance rally in Joplin Mo, today, but I did have a chance to speak to the organizer, Jesse Mills, of the Southwest Missouri Firearms Freedom Coalition. He told me he was pleased with the turn out, estimating a crowd [...]

*******

Gun-rights supporters gather at Old Poway Park on Saturday during the National Day of Resistance ral 🌄

 
Article:
 
— Several hundred people, mostly men, mostly older and almost universally conservative, descended on Old Poway Park Saturday afternoon to take part in a “Pro-Second Amendment” rally.
The local rally was part of a nationwide “Day of Resistance,” in opposition to recent gun-control legislation proposed and action taken in Washington, D.C. The Poway gathering was organized by conservative blogger Roger Cotton, who called it the “Shall Not Be Infringed” rally, echoing the last line of the Second Amendment.
 
“The focus of the rally is to serve as a call to action to citizens who value their individual liberties,” Cotton said.
 
The crowd was colorful and of like mind. Many wore messages on their T-shirts such as “Invest in Precious Metals – Buy Lead,” and “Freedom Requires a Truthful Press.”
 
Others carried signs bearing messages like “Victims who shoot back live longer,” and “The 2nd Amendment is the line in the sand,” and “Gun-free zones enable mass killings.”
 
“Don’t Tread on Me” flags were almost as common as Old Glory was.
 
Among those scheduled to speak during the three-hour rally were members of the San Diego chapter of the National Rifle Association, a conservative humorist and musician, and several conservative bloggers
.
“The problem is not firearms or their cartridges. The problem is a mental health issue,” said one early speaker, Julie Sutton, a blogger and humorist. “That’s what needs to be addressed. That, Mr. President, is what you should be focusing on.”
 
Sheriff’s deputies were present, but the gathering was peaceful. There was no opposition to cause trouble, and everyone obeyed the law and did not bring guns to the rally, officials said.
 
Last month, President Barack Obama urged Congress to require background checks for all gun sales and ban both military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines in a plea to curb gun violence in America.
 
Obama also signed 23 executive actions, including orders to make more federal data available for background checks and end a freeze on government research on gun violence.
 
The president’s actions came just a month after the Dec. 14 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in Newtown, Conn., in which 26 people, including 20 children, were killed by a lone gunman armed with an assault rifle.
 
Even before Obama outlined his gun control plans, sales of weapons of all kinds skyrocketed among people fearing bans, which for the most part haven’t been proposed, that may limit their ability to purchase firearms in the future.
 
The National Day of Resistance was timed for Feb. 23 to reflect the 23 executive actions, according to the official website of the movement.
 
Cotton, who said he does not own any guns but believes in the Constitution, said he got the idea to stage the rally a few weeks ago after hearing one police chief say the disarming of America could be accomplished within a generation and another say the Second Amendment is a dangerous right.
“Since I was a kid, I’ve been in love with this country,” he said. “I don’t want anything to happen to it beyond what has already happened. I just decided to do this. It’s really just me getting fed up.”
Similar rallies occurred throughout the country Saturday.
Mugshot of J. Harry Jones

J. Harry Jones

North County
*******

Thousands attend gun support rallies held nationwide on Feb. 23
Leslie Eastman at Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion - 5 hours ago

As Obama signed 23 executive orders to “control gun violence” that impact citizen rights under the Second Amendment, supporters of gun ownership held hundreds of rallies across the country this Saturday (Feb. 23) to protest these rules. The theme for many was “Day of Resistance“; however, in San Diego, it was entitled “Shall Not Be [...]

Friday, February 22, 2013

Matt Bracken: Democide

In case you missed this very sobering video in my Day of Resistance post, I am sharing it again along with written commentary from Western Rifle Shooters Association blog.

If you care ANYTHING AT ALL about our freedoms here in America, then I urge you to watch the video, read the commentary written by Matt Bracken, and then share on your blog, website, forum, Face Book page etc. so that more people will be educated and informed regarding what is really at stake when ObaMARXIST and his ilk want to infringe upon the Second Amendment rights of We The People; RIGHTS that are given to us under God first, and then under the Charters of Freedom that are guaranteed by our United States Constitution!!

~ Christine




Full Text of essay:

Quote:

Spread this latest work by Matt Bracken and friends far and wide, especially the video:

Democide: Socialism, Tyranny, Guns and Freedom

Democide is the elimination of a despised group by a government. It includes genocide, politicide, and other forms of state-sponsored mass murder. The hated minority headed for extermination may be defined by religious, racial, political, class, cultural or other attributes. Between 200 and 260 million people were the victims of democide in the 20th century, several times more than were killed in international wars during that period.

The first widely studied modern democide occurred in Turkey between 1915 and 1923, when the Turkish government decided to eliminate the country’s Christian minority, primarily ethnic Armenians and Greeks who had Turkish roots extending back to before the Islamic conquest. Two million Christians were murdered on forced marches into deserts without water or food. This democide occurred in view of Western reporters, who took photographs and posted contemporary wire reports. The fact that the democide was known outside Turkey did not deter the Turkish leaders.
The Armenian Genocide, as it has become known, was also widely known inside Turkey, where the majority Muslim population either supported or at least passively tolerated the democide. It was impossible to miss the sight of thousands of Christians at a time being rounded up and force-marched through towns and into the burning deserts on one-way trips.

Stalin and Hitler both noticed the lack of world reaction to the democide of Turkish Christians and planned accordingly. In the Soviet Union, Stalin’s henchmen purged millions of “kulaks” (farmers deemed to have too much wealth), intellectuals, businessmen, and anyone who had ever traveled outside the USSR or even had had contact with foreigners.

In Germany and Nazi-occupied Europe, Hitler proceeded with his own “final solution to the Jewish problem.” Where the German national socialists simply eliminated Jews as quickly as possible in mass graves and gas chambers, Stalin’s international socialists deported their “class enemies” to Siberia, where they were put to work in Gulag slave-labor camps, with years of torture through cold, malnutrition and brutal working conditions preceding the release of eventual death.

Stalin also devised another means of democide when he ordered the forced starvation of the Ukrainians, and five million more innocent victims were added to his totals. In Communist China seventy million people were the victims of democide, murdered by overwork in slave-labor camps, by direct execution, and by regional forced starvation. Millions more were victims of democide in Pakistan, Cambodia, Rwanda, North Korea, and many other countries.

Democide, as the name implies, does not happen in the dark of night without any awareness of it in the country where it occurs. The Turks knew the Christians were being mass murdered. Average Germans were fully aware of what was happening to the Jews between 1938 and 1945, and a large majority either actively supported or at least tolerated it. (I strongly recommend reading Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, by Daniel Goldhagen, to fully appreciate the wholehearted German support for the Jewish democide.)

Today, we sometimes hear that the Second Amendment has outlived its usefulness, that it is a relic of our barbaric past and is no longer needed in the modern era. Horrific mass shootings by deranged individuals are cited as the primary reason for Americans to surrender their most effective firearms and rely solely on a state monopoly of force for their protection. This government-dependent attitude is shortsighted, historically ignorant, and extremely dangerous.

In each of the cases cited above, a necessary preliminary step on the road to democide was the confiscation of privately owned firearms. In Turkey, “reasonable” gun control laws enacted in 1911 permitted the democide of two million Turkish Christians a few years later. In Germany, the “commonsense” 1928 gun control laws of the Weimar Republic preceded Hitler’s Holocaust by a decade.

The Weimar politicians did not intend for their gun control laws to lead to the slaughter of millions of people, but it is an historical fact that those gun control laws permitted the Nazis to carry out their Holocaust. How? By making it economically and militarily feasible to round up and mass murder entire towns without any significant resistance.

In fact, the Nazis quickly learned that they needed only a hundred ordinary military policemen to exterminate towns of a thousand Polish Jews in a single day. Contrast that fact with the Warsaw Ghetto uprising. If the Jews had not first been disarmed, using previous gun registration lists as a map for confiscation, the Holocaust would not have been possible.

Likewise in the Soviet Union and in every other case, democide was preceded by “reasonable and commonsense” firearms registration, followed eventually by gun confiscation and then by the extermination of a despised minority population.

During the past two centuries, while America has avoided tyranny, Turkey, Germany, Russia and the other nations mentioned above have spasmodically lurched between monarchs, democratically elected leaders, and often quite popular dictators, allowing them frequent opportunities to commit democide against their unwanted minorities.

The situation is fundamentally different in America, because we have a centuries-old tradition of private firearms ownership guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the Constitution. The Second Amendment does not “grant” us this right; it puts into writing our God-given natural right to effective self-defense, including armed defense against tyranny.

“Pure democracy” has been described as two wolves and a sheep voting on their dinner plans. The two wolves might see this election as an expression of their highest democratic values, but for the outnumbered sheep, pure democracy is highly problematic. On the other hand, a republic has been described as two wolves and a well-armed sheep voting on dinner plans. The well-armed sheep can veto the outcome of the dinner election simply by brandishing its firearm. The sheep has inherent rights as a sovereign individual, including the right to self-defense, a right that cannot be stripped away by a simple majority vote.

So, when a democratically elected American president speaks of “fundamentally transforming” his country, and of his need to act outside the constitutional framework, the population should be on guard. When that leader begins to push for strict new “commonsense and reasonable” gun control laws, including national firearms registration in the name of “public safety,” the citizenry should be on high alert.

Can any glib politician, pundit or ivory tower academic give us an ironclad guarantee that tyranny will never arise in the United States? Not even a popular tyranny, like those of Ataturk, Stalin, Hitler or Mao? Can anyone assure us that today’s “commonsense” gun registration lists will not be used for future gun confiscation? Of course not.

The future may be unknowable, but history is well understood, and American gun owners know and understand the history of democide in the 20th century. That is why they will never accede to what is currently portrayed in the predominantly left-wing mainstream media as “commonsense and reasonable” new gun control laws.

While American gun owners lament and regret the inescapable fact that deranged individuals in a free country may on rare occasions murder a dozen or a score of unarmed victims, they also understand that government democide murders by the million. And in every case, tyrants can conduct these democides only after disarming their unwanted minorities, rendering them helpless to resist murderous government pogroms.

American gun owners will never permit this historical pattern to be repeated in their country, because they understand that the government’s heavy hand will be kept in check only as long as they are armed. Ask yourself: Were the Armenians, the Jews or the kulaks treated better, or worse, after they were disarmed and rendered helpless by their oppressors, who thereafter held an absolute government monopoly on armed violence? The answer is too obvious to require elaboration.

Naive utopians and other “low-information voters” might not understand the historical pattern, and we don’t expect them to bother to learn it. Cynical and dishonest “progressives” who do understand the historical pattern cannot yet reveal their ultimate goal of creating a disarmed and helpless American citizenry. Nevertheless, millions of Americans understand their hidden aim with crystal clarity, seeing through the false sincerity of power-hungry leftist politicians who are actually Marxist wolves dressed in Democrat sheep’s clothing—for now.

But unless and until these secret Stalinists and sundry other “progressives” can figure out a way to disarm Americans, they cannot execute their historically standard final solution to the “reactionaries-standing-in-the-way-of-utopia” problem. And this is a thorny problem for them, because tens of millions of Americans, disbelieving their deceitful bromides, will stick to their guns no matter what.

Unlike the Armenians, Jews, kulaks and other exterminated peoples, Americans who support the Second Amendment will never be disarmed quietly by government edict prior to meekly boarding a train to a socialist “reeducation” camp. They will not be taken at government gunpoint on a one-way forced march into a desert or a Zyklon-B “delousing shower,” simply because they foolishly agreed to be disarmed by their future oppressors in the dubious name of “public safety.”

If American “progressives” truly intend to disarm the American people, they will have to do it the hard way, by taking their bullets first, one at a time. As the 300 Spartans announced to the vastly larger Persian army at Thermopylae, “Molon Labe!”

You want our guns? Then come and take them!

No registration—no confiscation—no extermination!

Freedom now, freedom forever!

Please see the YouTube video of the same title.  /unquote

Hat tip: Western Rifle Shooters Association - Bracken: Democide

*******

The following is a video sarcastically entitled, "A Tribute to Communism" by the creator. The reason being that there are a lot of pro-communist propaganda videos on Youtube, "celebrating" the tenets of that evil ideology. Prepare yourself for another devastatingly sobering account (as has been masterfully described in the essay above by Matt Bracken) of the real truth about what ObaMAO and his ilk believe. Remember, as CommieBlaster.com informs us on a daily basis, the links between the following ideologies which are held by most in the ObaMARXIST BADministration cannot be ignored!

PROGRESSIVES = SOCIALISTS = COMMUNISTS = LEFT-WING RADICALS = ANTI-CAPITALISTS = UNAMERICAN


Saturday, January 26, 2013

BHO: War Monger and Lying "Lord of the Flies"

The other day, I had a brief discussion with my husband regarding BHO.  I told him that all BHO wants to do is campaign for his terrible agenda and do everything possible to rip apart the GOP.  He doesn't lead this country.  His goal is to pulverize his opponents.  And, the few conservative commentators out there in radio and TV land who are onto this scheme are currently trying to get conservatives to not give up the fight. [Update:  But as my friend Steve tells us in his latest post, why didn't they stand up and expose BHO for the fraud that he is way back in 2008??]

I didn't listen to BHO's speech when he was inaugurated.  I just couldn't stomach the debacle.  But over the past several days since then, I have heard portions of the speech that should be alarming to anyone who isn't an ObamaBorgBot.

Received an email from Brent Bozell (who appears on Hannity's TV show on a regular basis) that is right on the mark concerning the "love" affair of the liberal media "elites" and BHO.  In his letter, Bozell mentions the Newsweek cover depicting BHO as "The Second Coming."  In my previous blog post entitled About That "Second Coming" Reference I shared my thoughts on the subject.

Well, if BHO is considered to be "lord" of anything, then perhaps we could give him the title lord of the flies? Yes! That's it! The lord of the flies - AND LIES!

At least the fly-lord has FINALLY been found guilty of violating the U.S. Constitution when he illegally made appointments To The NLRB.

Back to the subject of this post.

The following is a copy of Brent Bozell's email letter:

Dear Christine,

Newsweek stopped its print edition at the end of 2012, but they still tried to scandalize the country by producing a fake cover honoring Obama's second inauguration as "The Second Coming." This absurd attempt at myth-making is a natural progression. The "cover" story was written by Evan Thomas, who proclaimed on MSNBC a few years ago that Obama was "sort of like God" in being above the gritty political fray.

It was just as absurd when Newsweek writer David Frum, the formerly conservative Bush speechwriter, tweeted this piece of media-elite nonsense: "First term Obama: punchee, 2nd term Obama, puncher."

No one calling himself a "political observer" can say Obama was some sort of mute victim, consistently under fire, on defense over the last four years. Quote Obama from anywhere, and he's fiercely bashing the GOP. In April 2011, he said the House GOP budget plan would force "poor children," "children with autism," and "kids with disabilities" to "fend for themselves." In another 2011 speech, he described the Republican plan as "let's have dirtier air, dirtier water, less people with health insurance."

These aren't even the Obama-Biden 2012 TV ads. They were pure gutter sleaze.

In truth, the media elites want Obama to destroy conservatives. Too far-fetched, you say? Slate.com published an article by John Dickerson on January 18 headlined "Go for the Throat! Why if he wants to transform American politics, Obama must declare war on the Republican Party."

This "reporter" is the political director of CBS News. The spirit of Dan Rather remains.

Dickerson said Obama doesn't want to rest on his first-term laurels. So "Obama's only remaining option is to pulverize. Whether he succeeds in passing legislation or not, given his ambitions, his goal should be to delegitimize his opponents." He needs "clarifying fights over controversial issues," so "he can force Republicans to either side with their coalition's most extreme elements or cause a rift in the party that will leave it, at least temporarily, in disarray."

We're informed that "extreme" conservatism, as defined by the Tea Party or the NRA, should be "illegitimate." This is precisely what CBS was selling about Ronald Reagan 32 years ago. Dickerson wants Obama to be liberal enough to spur "more tin-eared, dooming declarations of absolutism like those made by conservatives who sought to define the difference between legitimate and illegitimate rape – and handed control of the Senate to Democrats along the way."

In imagining a slow political suicide of the American right, Dickerson isn't so much out in front of Obama as helpfully channeling Obama. On Saturday's "Early Show" on CBS, Dickerson explained Obama's thinking: "We heard in his press conference this week – which is, confrontation has to be the order of the day. He's tried to work with Republicans and as he said, you know, I could have more parties with them but it doesn't change the way they behave."

It's preposterous that a "journalist" would say all this. It is mind-boggling to consider he actually believes this.

Another CBS star, Bob Schieffer, demonstrated the media's impatience with anything but a fervently leftist Obama in a second term. After the president made a speech for more gun control, Schieffer leaned on history to insist that beating the "gun lobby" has to be easier than killing Osama bin Laden or "defeating the Nazis."

Schieffer argued, "the president is going to have to do more than just make a speech about it. This is one of the best speeches I've ever heard him deliver, but it's going to take more than that from the White House. He's going to have to get his hands dirty."

Liberal journalists don't want lofty oratory in the second term. They want conservatives defeated and "delegitimized." They want a smash-mouth Obama who accomplishes their agenda of "responding to the threat of climate change," and marriages for our "gay brothers and sisters" in all 50 states, and amnesty for "bright young students" so they "will be enlisted in our workforce rather than expelled from our country." All of these and more were promised to liberals in Obama's second inaugural address.

Richard Stevenson at The New York Times passed along the Orwellian echo of Obama's "unapologetic argument that modern liberalism was perfectly consistent with the spirit of the founders."

Sincerely,


L. Brent Bozell III
Founder and President
Media Research Center
 
How apropos that the rag mag NewsWEAK would end its print edition (Yay!  About time!!) with a photo of the lord-of-the-flies BHO and trying to depict him as someone even remotely close to anything (or Anyone) godly!  It has to be one of the most ironic things I've ever seen the liberal left lunatics try to do with their commie puppet pResident who still continues to squat illegally in the people's White House.

Liberals are existing in their own kind of "Truman Show" where they think that what is being depicted on TV is true and that the delegitimization of BHO's opponents will somehow defeat conservatism in the United States of America.  There may be many "Trumans" out there, still not aware of the reality behind the false scenery and evil agenda of BHO, that the media of mass deception continue to perpetuate. However, more and more will finally catch on to what is really going on and want to get out from under the tyranny.

We need to keep sounding the alarms about the dangers of this Marxist/Islamo-
Fascist  parade towards tyranny of our people and continue to pray, work, and watch for opportunities to share the truth.

Hat tips:

Cry and Howl
Klein Online
End Times Blogspot
Nice Deb
Media Research Center
Commieblaster.com
Transparency Now.com

*******

UPDATE!!!

A MUST READ POST BY MY FRIEND STEVE AT CRY AND HOWL!

*******

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Hypocrisy Of Gun Control Advocates Revealed

Project Veritas has the greatest video out which demonstrates the absolute hypocrisy of the progressive lefties who spout virulent rhetoric (and newspapers that out the location of the homes of gun owners) against gun owner rights to keep our Constitutional guaranteed Second Amendment Rights to own and carry firearms for protection.

Excerpt:


Project Veritas' founder, James O'Keefe remarked, "Our nation's children spend the majority of their week within schools that are starkly emblazoned with signs that read 'Gun Free Zone.' Project Veritas put that same concept to the test with some of America's most fervent advocates for gun control."

Organizing as Citizens Against Senseless Violence, Project Veritas' citizen journalists went door-to-door in New York, New Jersey and Washington, D.C. to see which outspoken champions for Gun Control would be willing to declare their own home as a "Gun Free Zone" by placing a sign on their lawn.

O'Keefe continued, "It's amazing to see members of our media equivocate and contradict their spoken and written words when faced with the dilemma to declare their own homes as Gun Free. Surprisingly, we found that the homes of the very New York paper that was willing to put the lives and fortunes of gun owners at risk by publishing their names and addresses, were also the most heavily armed and protected. The hypocrisy of New York's Journal News is beyond words."

Read it all HERE


See video at: The Project Veritas


From Project Veritas:


The fact is that the majority of our nation's children spend almost every day TRAPPED inside schools that are proudly emblazoned with signs reading "Gun Free Zone."
 
But when Project Veritas offered that same opportunity to some of America's most fervent advocates for gun control they REFUSED. If it's good enough for children, why isn't it good enough for them?






While the video above is entertaining, it is also very telling as to the state of hypocrisy in our media.
 
*******


Some quotes from the video when homeowners were asked if they would put a sign up on their lawn that reads, "This Home Is Proudly Gun Free":

"I appreciate what you're doing but will pass on the sign."

"I agree with you but don't want the sign on my lawn."



Hat tips:

The Steady Drip Blog [where I first viewed the video]

Project Veritas

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Painting of Obama Trampling Constitution

According to my stats page, 171 hits (as of 1/17/13 at 12:19 p.m. PT) have come over to this blog from Face Book to view a painting by Jon McNaughton that depicts Obama trampling on our U.S. Constitution!  The link below is a blog post that I did back in February, 2012.  There are more paintings to view, and also a video at the link.

Painting of Obama Trampling Constitution Resurfaces, Artist‘s New Work Tells ’Enslaved‘ Americans to ’Wake Up!’

I think that BHO's 23 gun-grabbing, unconstitutional executive orders yesterday have absolutely outraged a A LOT OF PEOPLE!!!





Excerpt:

Some may already be familiar with the image featured above. For those who aren’t, it is painting titled “The Forgotten Man” which features President Obama trampling on the Constitution while an astonished James Madison pleads with him to stop. To the side, a man sits on a park bench in the throes of depression while 43 presidents look on. The painting, which uses discarded dollar bills and scraps of paper with individual constitutional amendments scrawled onto them.

He explained that the man on the park bench “represents every man, woman, and child who is an American“ and who ”hopes to find the American dream of happiness and prosperity.” The artist added, “But now because of unconstitutional acts imposed on the American people by our government we stand on the precipice of disasters.”



Original Hat tip: The Blaze.com

Would The U.S. Gov. Knowingly Tell Lies To Its People To Promote Their Agenda?

 
I know...sounds like a silly question.  After all that we have seen in the BHO BADministration, the answer to THAT question is YES THEY WOULD!  However, do we know why they could get away with it all?


With the blatant cover-ups of Fast and Furious, and the 9/11/12 Benghazi attack, why shouldn't the public question all of the inconsistencies, strange interviews, secrecy, weird photos, crisis actors and events surrounding the Sandy Hook tragedy?

While reading comments over at Professor Tracy's Memory Hole Blog I ran across a comment that propelled me to do some additional research.

Here is a copy of the comment:

DyingTruth

I think it’s also important to mention the fact that Government Propaganda/Psychological Warfare against the American People has been legalized via NDAA, has been added to the bigger picture and cannot be disregarded when these issues are discussed and considered.


CSC.ASU.edu: Smith-Mundt Has Been Modernized.


One thing that caught my attention in the Medical Examiner’s press conference video was his acknowledgement that this case would be handled differently than others he’s worked on, and more importantly his assuredness that he wouldn’t have to worry about any pending/future court proceedings.

I thought to myself “20 children died while in the custody of a public institution and out of the presence of their parents. Does Mr. Carver not know that these same parents as well as the rest of the public also have access to the courts? And given the circumstances, one could expect a grieving parent or parents to file a lawsuit demanding some form of accountability, because I wouldn’t expect all the parents to be taking this as good as Robbie Parker has been.
 
The link within the above comment tells us that: Smith-Mundt Has Been Modernized. What is Smith-Mundt? Well that link is supposed to inform us. However, I needed to learn more about Smith-Mundt and the NDAA connection.

At the end of the first article CSC.ASU.edu: Smith-Mundt Has Been Modernized. (which was unsatisfying for me and didn't give enough information) there are additional links:

Related posts:
  1. New Law Ends Smith-Mundt Ban On Domestic Dissemination Of Content
  2. Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 introduced in the House
  3. Public Diplomacy: The most unsettling section of the Smith-Mundt "modernization bill"
  4. Critics Fret About Smith-Mundt Modernization Act
  5. When do we start the honest debate over the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act?
I clicked on the first one, and then the fourth one.

The following essay gives us a better explanation of what this new law is really all about. It would appear that the author (based on his last sentence) is concerned about this new law.

 Copy of related post # 1:

John Brown Notes and Essays blog: Sunday, January 6, 2013 New Law Ends Smith-Mundt Ban On Domestic Dissemination Of Content

President Barack Obama this week signed into law a provision that lifts a nearly 65-year ban on domestic distribution of BBG content. But for BBG broadcasters, it’s business as usual…

As part of a defense authorization bill signed this week by the President, a World War II era [I would say early Cold-War era - JB] ban on domestic dissemination of BBG content was lifted.

Generally known as the Smith-Mundt Act, after its sponsors, a portion of the 1948 law prevented content intended for global audiences from being broadcast or distributed in the United States. It was intended, in part, to prevent what were then wartime overseas propaganda efforts from being directed toward U.S. citizens.

Worth noting, there is much more to Smith-Mundt than the domestic dissemination ban – much of it beneficial to U.S. international broadcasting.

However, much has changed since the Cold War, making the domestic dissemination ban portion of Smith-Mundt less necessary, and even potentially problematic.

For example, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, originally a CIA-funded entity, left that agency in 1972, found its way into the United States Information Agency, which was ultimately spun into the Broadcasting Board of Governors. That’s a brief history, but one meant to show the evolution toward its current situation — one guarded by a firewall intended to protect its journalistic integrity.

Radio Martí joined VOA and RFE/RL in 1985, along with Radio Free Asia in 1996, and Middle East Broadcasting Networks eight years later.

As content offerings grew, so did requests for that content from a rising number of U.S.-based ethnic broadcasters serving diaspora populations. Under the domestic dissemination ban, those requests, which ranged from Sudanese broadcasters in Minnesota to Cuban community broadcasters in Miami, were officially denied. The truth is, however, that many ethnic broadcasters used them regardless.

As internet distribution became available, keeping a lid on BBG content in the U.S. became even more difficult. The BBG could certainly geocode the content to prevent U.S. audiences from accessing it, but censoring the internet in a country with a founding tenet of freedom of the press was seen as a non-starter.

But even geocoding would not be the end of it. VOA Russian, for example, can be seen almost daily in New York City as local cable channel operators import Russian-language channels from overseas.

Enforcing the Smith-Mundt dissemination ban would become akin to a game of whac-a-mole.

In 2010, the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act was introduced, intended to lift the ban but not repeal the entire act. The Act was reintroduced in 2011, with a similar provision finally passing and signed on January 2, 2013. Lifting the ban was one of the goals set forth in the BBG’s most recent strategic plan.

For broadcasters, the change means little on a day-to-day basis – other than they need to worry less about their content popping up in the U.S.

Still, no money can be used to create content directed at domestic audiences, and there are no plans to measure any domestic audiences that may occur. [given this restriction, is the headline to this announcement quite correct? - JB]

*******

The #4 related post is entitled Critics Fret About Smith-Mundt Modernization Act. This particular author tells about the concern of the critics, but doesn't seem to be on board with their concerns.

Excerpt:

The House of Representatives has been working to amend the laws that govern the dissemination of “propaganda” materials in the U.S. What seemed like a good idea to me and others–one long overdue–is being spun by some observers as a dark effort by the DoD and State Department who want authorization to brainwash Americans.

Last night Buzzfeed posted an article claiming that the changes were being quietly inserted into a defense authorization bill. However, as Matt Armstrong reported, the changes were also part of a stand-alone bill (H.R. 5736) introduced last week. I confess I am no expert on the arcania of legislative machinery, but the fact that this bill was introduced a week ago and published by the Library of Congress–then later attached to the defense bill–strikes me as more of a procedural move than an effort to sneak something through.

In a further effort to build a sinister narrative, Buzzfeed frets that this is some sort of effort to enable unfettered psychological operations by the military and government on the U.S. population. Assorted quotes from the article:
The bill’s supporters say the informational material used overseas to influence foreign audiences is too good to not use at home, and that new techniques are needed to help fight Al-Qaeda, a borderless enemy whose own propaganda reaches Americans online.
The new law would give sweeping powers to the State Department and Pentagon to push television, radio, newspaper, and social media onto the U.S. public.
“Senior public affairs” officers within the Department of Defense want to “get rid” of Smith-Mundt and other restrictions because it prevents information activities designed to prop up unpopular policies—like the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
I am not a legal expert, and I suppose changes could have these kinds of consequences if not made carefully. But I doubt these these are the intended outcomes.

The author ends his post by saying:

Unintentional domestic dissemination is one thing, but what about more intentional efforts critics are claiming this legislation would enable? The language in the House bill seems clear enough that it only applies to “materials prepared for dissemination abroad” and does not in any way authorize expenditures for targeted influence of domestic audiences.


Despite the fact that author Steven R. Corman seems to pooh-pooh the concerns, his update is filled with more articles of individual writers being HIGHLY concerned about this!!   There are also "progressive" opinions at some of the links where we are being told that there is nothing to worry about.

My question.

If the Sandy Hook shooting was indeed a false flag operation and/or psy-ops "drill" that went awry, can it be that due to this new law it would actually be considered "legal" for the BHO BADministration to do that???

Scary thought...isn't it?

After all, it has given BHO the ability to surround himself with children while he signs 23 executive orders regarding gun control.  However, the fake "letters" from the children were so obviously coerced by adults.  Using children in your propaganda agenda is absolutely disgusting!!  Well, other Marxists like Stalin and National Socialists (Nazis) like Hitler did it too!

I am continually amazed at the lengths these evil tyrants will go to stomp on our Constitutional rights through pressing their hateful rhetoric, obvious propaganda,  and hated Marxist agenda upon our Constitutional Republic!  More Americans need to wake up and smell the tyranny!

Talk Wisdom Reports - You Decide

~ Christine

*******


Update May 23
This story continues to generate buzz. Here is a selection of recent opinion:
  • NDAA 2013: Congress approves domestic deceptive propaganda (rt.com, Russian “anonymous nonprofit organization.” Hmm.) Reauthorizing the indefinite detention of US citizens without charge might be the scariest provision in next year’s defense spending bill, but it certainly isn’t the only one worth worrying about. An amendment tagged on the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 would allow for the United States government to create and distribute pro-American propaganda within the country’s own borders under the alleged purpose of putting al-Qaeda’s attempts at persuading the world against Western ideals on ice.
  • Democrat Defends “Propaganda” Bill (Rebecca Elliot, BuzzFeed) Rep. Adam Smith from Washington championed the defense bill amendment that will “strike the current ban on domestic dissemination” of propaganda in an interview with Salon’s Glenn Greenwald earlier today.Repealing the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 is “not about trying to influence domestic audiences,” Smith emphaized. Rather, he intends the amendment to free up current restrictions placed on foreign information campaigns.
  • U.S. declares propaganda war on citizens (David Pruitt, The Alestle). I can appreciate security, and I’m sure some good arguments could be brought forward for a change in the policy. However, the government’s sexy smile and little wink does nothing to reassure me of any noble intentions. I have grown tired of overused phrases like “you can trust me” and “everybody else is doing it.” The government has a major image problem when it comes to being considered trustworthy. It would be just a matter of time before a self-serving politician used the bill to start another war or bail out another bank and tell us — well, whatever.
  • Smith-Mundt Modernization: Better Late than Never (Helle Dale, Heritage). Critics have already voiced concerns that this will open the floodgates of propaganda by the U.S. government. This is hardly likely. Indeed, access to programs and materials produced by the State and the BBG will allow Congress and the public a better understanding of what we are funding. Much of it is high-quality journalism, which deserves support, and some programming could have a positive impact on certain immigrant communities in the United States that are vulnerable to radicalization. As for programming and materials that are controversial, questionable, or wasteful, doesn’t the U.S. public deserve to know what is being published or broadcast in its name?
  • Are Government’s ‘Strategic Communications’ Coming to American Airwaves? (Rachel Marsden, Townhall). I see. So the Smith-Mundt Act was strictly limited to countering communist propaganda overseas, because the idea of conducting government propaganda operations within a country at a time when Joseph Goebbels was a household name would have triggered post-traumatic stress.
  • Our View: Truth The Best Tool In Our Defense Efforts (Yankton Press & Dakotan editorial). Does issuing distorted information to our own public make us any better than those who spew out misinformation for their own ends? Americans are better served by the truth. Whether we’re truly getting that now from our own defense department (let alone our news organizations) is certainly debatable, but that debate is just as important and vital to public morale as any news release or communiqué. Keep the laws as they are — strengthen them, in fact — and maintain an America with eyes wide open. The truth is the best antidote to distortion. It may not set as free, but it will certainly keep us free to think.
  • Consider this: American Dollars on American Propaganda to Brainwash American Citizens (Lisa Cerda, City Watch LA). y striking the existing ban on domestic misinformation campaigns, Americans can expect to be programmed on an even greater scale than ever before. Many would argue that the most prolific misinformation campaign comes in the way of our American History books in our schools. Others would say it is the gag order fueled by corporate interests on our mainstream media
  • .
  • NDAA Amendment Would Legalize War Propaganda (John Glaser, Antiwar Blog). In other words, people are getting information online that we don’t want people to have – therefore, legalize domestic propaganda. So NDAA is the latest effort by Congress (after SOPA, CISPA and the others) to take control of the best resource the American people have. The Internet is too open, too free, too…subversive. We need information the government wants us to have, not all that other stuff.
  • Proposed US law makes domestic propaganda legal (Cory Doctrow, BoingBoing). The amendment, sponsored by Rep. Mac Thornberry from Texas and Rep. Adam Smith from Washington State, would allow the US government to knowingly tell lies to its people in order to promote the government’s own policies.
  • Misleading Your Own (“The Reverend,” Akron Beakon Journal Online). So, I guess giving U.S. government and military officials the power to purposely deceive and mislead Americans into accepting policies which are unpopular….like more war….is just the natural flow of events for a rotted, bloated and declining Empire. The Soviets regularly lied to, deceived and misled their citizens about military adventurism, about worker productivity,…about the United States. The Soviets misled their people to help bolster acceptance of their policies, foreign and domestic. In the long run, that didn’t work. And it will not work for the U.S.A. either.
Hat tips to all links.

*******

Update:

Commieblaster has a round-up of reactions against BHO's gun control executive orders. Here are just a few:

LATEST COMMIE NEWS
Updated: Thursday, January 17, 2013 at 5:59 AM
With Stroke of Pen: Obama Moves to Ban Sale and Manufacture of Semi-Automatic Weapons 01.16.13
Obama's Begging for Impeachment 01.16.13
Rand Paul: Obama Breaking the Law, Has King Complex 01.16.13
Oregon Sheriff Tells Obama: Illegal, We will Not Enforce 01.16.13
NRA AD: MSM Speaks for Elites, America Speaks for Itself 01.16.13
Citizens from 47 States Revolt Against Obama Orders 01.16.13
Flashback: Heston Talks to Al Gore About Gun Rights 01.16.13
Piers Morgan Loses Another Gun Debate 01.16.13

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Obama's Hypocrisy

Of course, the gun control issue that is being heavily exploited by the BHO BADminstration is but one of a long line of hypocritical and propagandist attempts to disarm Americans and turn our nation into a socialist nightmare.   BHO's attempts at gun grabbing and tyranny will not work!  But he will use anything (disgustingly - he will even use children like Hitler and Saddam Hussein often did) to present himself as something other than a tyrant.  However, at least 45% (if not more) of the public is on to his deceit and not falling for his staged propaganda.

I think the following ad highlights both BHO's elitism and hypocrisy!  It is spot on and needs to go viral!

~ Christine

*******

Go to the NRA website to view it.

NRA.org

~ Christine *******


Hat Tip:

NRA.org


Also see:

 

Saturday, January 12, 2013

Research and Analysis of Sandy Hook Shooting [Updates 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

So many inconsistencies, unanswered questions, and strange behavior by those who did appear on camera after the Sandy Hook School massacre has led many bloggers to question the "official" story regarding what actually happened that day.

There are some researchers who are claiming that no children were actually killed and that it was a well planned out (2 year plan) "false flag" operation.

Others claim that the shooting and deaths did happen, but some (like Emilie Parker) were not killed because she appears in a photo with BHO after the tragedy.

*******

Update # 9

Here's another example of a fundraiser being put on on FaceBook on December 10, 2012


FaceBook: Timeline Photo



Here's another example of foreknowledge of Sandy Hook: FaceBook.com photo of timestamp

The person who caught this writes:

Dutchsinse

Since Im catching total hell from the peanut gallery of disbelievers...Let me again clarify.

Google time stamps show the original date of the post.

The FUNDRAISER website shows the time of the post down to the minute. If you think this is somehow fake, please explain how someone fakes a GOOGLE time stamp. Your own personal website "time" has nothing to do with the Google timestamp.

These fundraiser sites are NOT blogs that allow you to change the time by the way. See my fundraiser if you have any doubts.. its the same kind of fundraiser page as mine, just a different company.. same format and everything.

Sure anyone can change their blog to be whatever time zone they want.. date they want.. But if you make a post.. Google picks it up and puts it in the search based upon when it was posted "internet time" wise--- in otherwords, it doesn't matter what date you have on your blog, website etc... When you post.. Google caches it as a post for 'that day'. In this case.. 'that day' was December 10, 2012, four days before the shooting.

This is not the only site either.. there are others. This is one of the better examples of a full match between Google Cache AND the website date/time. again, here is just one example of many.. for sure you'll see old posts with secondary titles come up.. but then you'll see fundraising sites and a few others with December 5th, 10th, and 11th POSTING DATES.. not blog dates. You Caring.com

here is the full search.. going from Oct 2012.. to the day BEFORE the shooting: Google search Sandy Hook shooting fundraisers

Update # 8


Why was there another website created on December 10, 2012 instructing parents to talk about the Sandy Hook tragedy, when the shooting happened on December 14th??? That link has a screen shot of the page before they apparently realized their "error" and changed the date to December 14th.

Article about the screen shot: Nodisinfo.com: Sandy Hook Scam Confirmed: Hard Evidence of Foreknowledge?

Hat tip: The Mad Jewess


*******
Update # 5  [Decided to include this one up top.  You will see why it is an important update because of the new information it contains.]


The Intelhub.com: Sandy Hook Shooting: Active-Shooter Drill Confirmed by Law Enforcement Raises Suspicion of False Flag Operation

Be sure to read the new information shared at the website.  It includes info about Carver (see strange interview below this update).  The author at the link is not a crazed conspiracy theorist.  In fact, if you do a search you will find hundreds of thousands of links were people are questioning the "official" story on Sandy Hook.

From Intelhub.com:

Related Reports:
Note: The above article as well as the other articles linked above are open ended and independent investigations. Information is ever changing in the investigation as we establish the facts and weed out the disinformation.

Naturally, some of the facts originally posted in the investigation may change and as they do we will update the reports. This investigation is in no way closed and any individual detail within the investigation should not be taken as 100% fact as details really do continue to change. 

It is also important to note and counter the claim that investigating the shooting is a disgrace to those who were murdered. In fact, the truth of the matter is actually the exact opposite. We truly believe the best way to honor whoever did actually die is to investigate the event, something the corporate controlled media has refused to do. We have not undertaken this investigation to hurt any of the victims family members, we are simply seeking the truth, WHEREVER that may take us.

You can help us separate the facts from the disinformation by sending any information you may have to us by commenting below or sending us an email.

*******

Update #6 [Found this link within the first "Related Reports" at the Intelhub blog link above in Update #5.]

Memory Hole Blog.com: The Sandy Hook Massacre: Unanswered Questions and Missing Information   This looks like the original site of the article (which I originally found on Daily Thought Pad blog) and belongs to the professor who was "outed" by Anderson Cooper on CNN as a "crazy conspiracy theory" person.  The "About" page at Memory Hole Blog:  The site is authored and maintained by James F. Tracy PhD, Associate Professor of Media Studies at Florida Atlantic University. *******















Then we have the coroner who held the most bizarre press conference I have ever seen!





All of this bothers me...immensely!!

 I was thinking that if this current BADministration could get away with the Fast and Furious gun scandal, the Benghazi gun running scandal from Libya to Syria where things apparently went awry and four Americans ended up dead, and the Drone killings ordered by BHO that have killed over 2,000 people (including women and children); then this BADministration must be entirely emboldened to think that they could get away with something as awful as a school shooting and disgustingly use it as propaganda in order to change the minds of the American people to support gun control - or even gun confiscation!

I recall hearing on one TV broadcast report (I don't think it was Fox News because I was at another home where it wasn't on at the time) [early in the investigation] that "an entire classroom was missing." Now, that could have been the students who were hiding in a closet (? I think?) or was it a bathroom?? with their teacher, but how would so many children fit in a closet unless it was huge (or a bathroom)? In the YouTube video (above link) interview, "Roig" said she hid them in a bathroom.

Admittedly, I don't have the time, skills, nor expertise to do all the research that would be necessary. I have already posted at least two or three blog posts about the incident that contained links to other blogs, YouTube videos etc. which showed the inconsistencies, unanswered questions, and strange behaviors that have been noticed by many other bloggers, too.

With a complicit lame stream media of mass deception, we can't be sure of anything anymore!

However, if you want to take the time to read at the following two links (or, you can view/hear a 2 hour video synopsis at either link) you might join me in questioning the "official" story about Sandy Hook.

Talk Wisdom Reports - You Decide.

~ Christine

*******

Daily Thought Pad: The Sandy Hook School Massacre: Unanswered Questions and Missing Information Inconsistencies and anomalies abound when one turns an analytical eye to news of the New town school massacre

Brendan Hunt: My Research and Analysis of the Sandy Hook Shooting

[Note: There are five parts to Mr. Hunt's research. Click on the "Update: I have written two additional articles on this topic here and here" at the top of the first post, and then see Part Four and Part Five.]

Hat tips to all links.

*******

Update #1:

Also see:

Godlike Productions: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!

Fake Medical Examiner too! Godlike Productions: Forum message

I'm sick to my stomach...

*******

Update #2:

Breakng News MUST WATCH Raw Helicopter Footage Before The Fake Sandy Hook School Shooting

And just to be fair, here is the only coverage that I have found (so far) regarding an MSM attempt to debunk the "conspiracy theorists":

Anderson Cooper Tackles 'Sickening,' 'Ignorant' Newtown Conspiracy Theories

Published on Jan 10, 2013
I was tipped off about helicopter footage of the Sandy Hook Incident Before The Shooting Started........ This Is That Footage..... Please Download This Before The Powers remove it.
No ambulances present, the fire engine i have been told has Detroit On It.. Please look out for the police car with no police department marked on it.. this footage came from a major news site.. This footage proves NO shooting took place...  Nobody died... This is damming evidence..I am sorry about my voice as I have a sore throat from the chem trails.
*******

Update #3:



[Note: I don't know why the narrator is blaming George Bush??]

Next:






Update # 4:

Comment in the thread:

Re: Anderson Cooper: "Newtown conspiracy theorists are sickening."
Do yall see what is happening?

Its as clear as the Sandy Hook Hoax.

Do you think these people would waste one second mentioning US.. "the conspiracy nuts" unless they had an agenda?

They are building the conspiracy propaganda on purpose.
The old saying "There is no such thing as bad publicity" was made for a reason.
They are going to bring us into the public eye... demonize us, then after the sheep start to question on their own... they are going to disclose AWESOME VIDEO EVIDENCE! YES... video evidence!

Why do you think the school has been closed and on lock down since the day of the shooting? Why do you think no one is allowed near the school?
Answer: They set up inside the school "after the fact" and Hollywood fake moon landing style recorded "footage" that they can disclose later. This footage, rest assured will include some remarkably clear shots of all the points they are pushing. Including a bunch of shots of a skinny dude with a mask on. A shit load of video of a nice shiny AR-15 "MILITARY KILLING MACHINE assault rifle!
Everyone of the people they claim died... that you seen OBVIOUS fake interviews with relatives or friends are alive and are CIA planted. Thats why we havent seen one shot of a crime scene. Not one shot of blood. Not one shot of a dead body. Nothing... because there was NOTHING to show you.
They will have had all the time needed to fix us a nice shiny remarkably clear video.
Im calling it now. Wait and see. These [vulgarity redacted] fudged this job up so bad its almost laughable.

What WE... meaning the awakened "conspiracy theory" nuts have to do is SPREAD THIS INFO TO EVERY ONE YOU CAN GET TO SIT LONG ENOUGH TO VIEW IT!
Why should you be concerned?
Because your very FREEDOM to 'conspire' against something your told to believe is on the line.
The agenda is to remove our firearms.... which will lead to stopping the 'conspiracy' loons...which in turn will end up shutting every conspiracy site, personal blog, contradictory
web site down for good!
We will be silenced and prosecuted!


For the sake of our children's future.... their freedoms ect... WE HAVE GOT TO EXPOSE THIS HOAX TO THE MASSES!

This hoax has the potential the end up OUR 9/11 ... allowing us to take back our freedoms.

God bless

(If you want to know how this went down... here ya go)

Thread: ***SPOILER ALERT*** Sandy Hook Hoax ***
Yuri
Gervasii
*******

Update #7:

Found this disturbing piece of information in a comment on The IntelHub:

saclem says:
Behold a Pale Horse, 1991, Whistle blower William Cooper, R.I.P., page 225 – He writes,
“The government encouraged the manufacture and importation of military firearms for the criminals to use. This is intended to foster a feeling of insecurity, which would lead the American people to voluntarily disarm themselves by passing laws against firearms. Using DRUGS and hypnosis on mental patients in a process called ORION, the CIA inculcated the desire in these people to open fire on schoolyards and thus inflame the antigun lobby. This plan is well underway, and so far is working perfectly. The middle class is begging the government to do away with the 2nd amendment”.
 
He goes on to say that in most cases, PROZAC was involved as was brain implants, or microwave, or E.L.F. intrusion, with most cases ending in suicide of the perpetrator.

Russ Dizdar author of THE BLACK AWAKENING calls these types of killers “sleeper assassins” who through use of trauma are mind-controlled or rather mind-fragmented and through occult rituals and hypnotic trances can be manipulated into mass murderous acts upon command. Steve Quayle of Omega man radio also is very knowledgeable with regard to the unseen forces controlling our world.
  
Nothing is ever as it first appears.

[Note:  You can scroll down a bit in the comment section at the IntelHub link to read a PDF of Cooper's writings, and a bit further down, someone posted a video of his lecture.]