Saturday, January 26, 2013

BHO: War Monger and Lying "Lord of the Flies"

The other day, I had a brief discussion with my husband regarding BHO.  I told him that all BHO wants to do is campaign for his terrible agenda and do everything possible to rip apart the GOP.  He doesn't lead this country.  His goal is to pulverize his opponents.  And, the few conservative commentators out there in radio and TV land who are onto this scheme are currently trying to get conservatives to not give up the fight. [Update:  But as my friend Steve tells us in his latest post, why didn't they stand up and expose BHO for the fraud that he is way back in 2008??]

I didn't listen to BHO's speech when he was inaugurated.  I just couldn't stomach the debacle.  But over the past several days since then, I have heard portions of the speech that should be alarming to anyone who isn't an ObamaBorgBot.

Received an email from Brent Bozell (who appears on Hannity's TV show on a regular basis) that is right on the mark concerning the "love" affair of the liberal media "elites" and BHO.  In his letter, Bozell mentions the Newsweek cover depicting BHO as "The Second Coming."  In my previous blog post entitled About That "Second Coming" Reference I shared my thoughts on the subject.

Well, if BHO is considered to be "lord" of anything, then perhaps we could give him the title lord of the flies? Yes! That's it! The lord of the flies - AND LIES!

At least the fly-lord has FINALLY been found guilty of violating the U.S. Constitution when he illegally made appointments To The NLRB.

Back to the subject of this post.

The following is a copy of Brent Bozell's email letter:

Dear Christine,

Newsweek stopped its print edition at the end of 2012, but they still tried to scandalize the country by producing a fake cover honoring Obama's second inauguration as "The Second Coming." This absurd attempt at myth-making is a natural progression. The "cover" story was written by Evan Thomas, who proclaimed on MSNBC a few years ago that Obama was "sort of like God" in being above the gritty political fray.

It was just as absurd when Newsweek writer David Frum, the formerly conservative Bush speechwriter, tweeted this piece of media-elite nonsense: "First term Obama: punchee, 2nd term Obama, puncher."

No one calling himself a "political observer" can say Obama was some sort of mute victim, consistently under fire, on defense over the last four years. Quote Obama from anywhere, and he's fiercely bashing the GOP. In April 2011, he said the House GOP budget plan would force "poor children," "children with autism," and "kids with disabilities" to "fend for themselves." In another 2011 speech, he described the Republican plan as "let's have dirtier air, dirtier water, less people with health insurance."

These aren't even the Obama-Biden 2012 TV ads. They were pure gutter sleaze.

In truth, the media elites want Obama to destroy conservatives. Too far-fetched, you say? published an article by John Dickerson on January 18 headlined "Go for the Throat! Why if he wants to transform American politics, Obama must declare war on the Republican Party."

This "reporter" is the political director of CBS News. The spirit of Dan Rather remains.

Dickerson said Obama doesn't want to rest on his first-term laurels. So "Obama's only remaining option is to pulverize. Whether he succeeds in passing legislation or not, given his ambitions, his goal should be to delegitimize his opponents." He needs "clarifying fights over controversial issues," so "he can force Republicans to either side with their coalition's most extreme elements or cause a rift in the party that will leave it, at least temporarily, in disarray."

We're informed that "extreme" conservatism, as defined by the Tea Party or the NRA, should be "illegitimate." This is precisely what CBS was selling about Ronald Reagan 32 years ago. Dickerson wants Obama to be liberal enough to spur "more tin-eared, dooming declarations of absolutism like those made by conservatives who sought to define the difference between legitimate and illegitimate rape – and handed control of the Senate to Democrats along the way."

In imagining a slow political suicide of the American right, Dickerson isn't so much out in front of Obama as helpfully channeling Obama. On Saturday's "Early Show" on CBS, Dickerson explained Obama's thinking: "We heard in his press conference this week – which is, confrontation has to be the order of the day. He's tried to work with Republicans and as he said, you know, I could have more parties with them but it doesn't change the way they behave."

It's preposterous that a "journalist" would say all this. It is mind-boggling to consider he actually believes this.

Another CBS star, Bob Schieffer, demonstrated the media's impatience with anything but a fervently leftist Obama in a second term. After the president made a speech for more gun control, Schieffer leaned on history to insist that beating the "gun lobby" has to be easier than killing Osama bin Laden or "defeating the Nazis."

Schieffer argued, "the president is going to have to do more than just make a speech about it. This is one of the best speeches I've ever heard him deliver, but it's going to take more than that from the White House. He's going to have to get his hands dirty."

Liberal journalists don't want lofty oratory in the second term. They want conservatives defeated and "delegitimized." They want a smash-mouth Obama who accomplishes their agenda of "responding to the threat of climate change," and marriages for our "gay brothers and sisters" in all 50 states, and amnesty for "bright young students" so they "will be enlisted in our workforce rather than expelled from our country." All of these and more were promised to liberals in Obama's second inaugural address.

Richard Stevenson at The New York Times passed along the Orwellian echo of Obama's "unapologetic argument that modern liberalism was perfectly consistent with the spirit of the founders."


L. Brent Bozell III
Founder and President
Media Research Center
How apropos that the rag mag NewsWEAK would end its print edition (Yay!  About time!!) with a photo of the lord-of-the-flies BHO and trying to depict him as someone even remotely close to anything (or Anyone) godly!  It has to be one of the most ironic things I've ever seen the liberal left lunatics try to do with their commie puppet pResident who still continues to squat illegally in the people's White House.

Liberals are existing in their own kind of "Truman Show" where they think that what is being depicted on TV is true and that the delegitimization of BHO's opponents will somehow defeat conservatism in the United States of America.  There may be many "Trumans" out there, still not aware of the reality behind the false scenery and evil agenda of BHO, that the media of mass deception continue to perpetuate. However, more and more will finally catch on to what is really going on and want to get out from under the tyranny.

We need to keep sounding the alarms about the dangers of this Marxist/Islamo-
Fascist  parade towards tyranny of our people and continue to pray, work, and watch for opportunities to share the truth.

Hat tips:

Cry and Howl
Klein Online
End Times Blogspot
Nice Deb
Media Research Center






GMpilot said...

CJW: ”...all BHO wants to do is campaign for his terrible agenda and do everything possible to rip apart the GOP.”
A president should campaign for his agenda. JFK did for the space program; Nixon did to formally recognize China; Bush did for “faith-based initiatives”, Obama for healthcare reform. Gee,
don't you remember all the maneuvering that was done to get us to invade Iraq? The so-called “yellowcake” buy in Africa that Saddam was supposed to have made? The 'weapons of mass destruction' he was building? The 'evidence' that Saddam helped plan the 9/11 attacks? Secretary Colin Powell solemnly declaring all that to the UN?
No? Then your memory is as short as your fingernails.

”...why didn't they stand up and expose BHO for the fraud that he is way back in 2008??”
Because they had no evidence that he was a fraud; just a belief. And they still have no evidence. Citing some some 18th-century Swiss guy to rework the US Constitution isn't evidence. Attempting to retroactively claim Obama doesn't meet all the standards isn't evidence, especially since at least four federal agencies were vetting him. If the professionals didn't find any such evidence, some harpy from Moldova isn't likely to either...and in almost five years of trying, has not.
Sheriff Joe claims he has evidence, but he constantly refuses to go to his DA or his state's AG with it. He only tells WingNut Daily (who I suspect finances his 'posse'), never ABC, or even NPR. If no conclusive evidence is ever presented in a court, then maybe, just maybe, there really isn't any.

I agree, the 'second coming' analogy is in poor taste. But it's really no comparison, as the obvious reference doesn't count--that person hasn't come back. Besides, the similar expression “comeback kid” was applied to Clinton, after his second win in '96. (Actually, it was National Review who predicted an Obama win as 'the second coming of Jimmy Carter'. Bitter pill, ain't it?)

”Liberals are existing in their own kind of "Truman Show" where they think that what is being depicted on TV is true and that the delegitimization of BHO's opponents will somehow defeat conservatism in the United States of America. There may be many "Trumans" out there, still not aware of the reality behind the false scenery and evil agenda of BHO, that the media of mass deception continue to perpetuate.”

Oh, really??

Glenn Beck: "321-217 victory for Romney in the electoral college."

Rush Limbaugh: "Everything -- Except the Polls -- Points to a Romney Landslide"
Michael Barone: "Romney Beats Obama, Handily"
George Will: Romney 321, Obama 217
Dick Morris: "Prediction: Romney 325, Obama 213"

Hey, how did that all turn out, anyway?

GMpilot said...

From what I've seen—right up to this week, when the GOP began removing the last traces of Romney from the recent past—it's the conservatives who have been living on the holodeck. It is they who have been trying to de-legitimize Obama since the summer of 2008.
FYI, I didn't listen to the inaugural speech either; I had other things to do. But I did read the transcript, later. It's much the best way, because there's no waiting between cheers, no distractions. Just the words. If you only 'heard portions' of what he said, then you're an untrustworthy source to quote him or remark on him.
But you already knew that, so you must be preparing to do some lying yourself. I'll be watching.

PS: Yes, he did do that, and it was ruled to be unconstitutional. But you're not going to get him ejected on those grounds.

Christinewjc said...

Here we go again... the "blame Bush" scenario never exits the lips (or typing hands) of a liberal.

In case you forgot - the chemical weapons were sent to Syria. There is fear that they will now be used on the people by tyrant Assad.

Not only is "the second coming" in poor taste (in the minds of most Bible-based Christians); it is also sadly accurate in that BHO is unleashing his worst propaganda during this second term to shed his wrath on those who oppose him. Remember what Valerie Jarrett said?

'If Obama Wins Election, There’ll Be “Hell To Pay” For Those That Opposed Him’ - Valerie Jarrett

The rampant voter fraud doesn't seem to bother you because "your guy" cheated to get re-elected. I think it is so sad that you can't even see the danger in that.

And, is Obama working on getting jobs for Americans? NO! He's pushing for gun control. Why is that?

I don't know if you saw my post about the Hypocrisy of Gun Control Advocates. See the video by Project Veritas and take note of what the guy near the end of the video says about a "right-wing" government taking control again.

steve said...

Despite GM's ability to work a key board he has got to be one of the most ignorant people I've ever read! Well ... yeah ... or ... at least a strong 2nd to Mr. Liming. He's the guy that says because the government has rounded up the firearms owned privately by now, it ain't going to happen. Kinda like, "I'm not dead yet, so I must not have cancer". A better one was last summer it was pretty hot and that proved that global warming is man made! Funny stuff.

Christinewjc said...

Speaking of ignorance...did you hear the latest from ObamaLIAR? He claimed that he goes "skeet shooting all the time."

HA HA HA HA HAAAA! The folks on The Five (Fox News Channel at 5 p.m. eastern, 2 p.m. Pacific)just had a field day with THAT lie!!!

Greg Gutfeld was HILARIOUS! Hope the video clip will be up at Fox website soon!

he he heeeeee!!!

BHO's handlers sure are funny!!!