Today's Moral Matters.org guest commentary is written by Chris Farrell.
In light of the fact that Chief Justice Roberts has referred the case, (12A606) “Edward Noonan et al., v The Calif. Sec. of State, Deborah Bowen,” to a full conference to be held on February 15th, the perfect opportunity to defeat the ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa’s assault on the 2nd Amendment is at hand.
‘The best defense is a good offense!” The Chief Justice must be persuaded to take up the case and render a decision which retro-actively abrogates the illegal election of a constitutionally ineligible candidate who fraudulently represented himself as eligible to be president. Even now Mr. Obama proceeds in a cover-up of unparalleled magnitude forging official documents and paying law firms millions of dollars to keep his true background hidden.
Consider the following: Could Chief Justice Roberts have been defensively posturing for the blow-back, the “black-lash” if you please, of a decision he may have realized would be necessary to make in the future on Mr. Obama’s purported constitutional eligibility when he ruled so surprisingly on Obamacare?
Could the Chief Justice be about to shock the Hell out of the world and rule against Obama as being constitutionally eligible to be president on February 15, 2013?
In the hope that this albeit far-fetched scenario is a possibility, is the NRA or the Republican Party making any effort to promote such a decision by the Supreme Court which would be the best outcome in defense of the Second Amendment?
Might not the Chief Justice have been positioning himself and the Supreme Court as apparently not being antagonistically inclined towards Mr. Obama so as to insulate them both from certain to arise liberal charges of racism should a decision need to be rendered by the court on the issue of constitutional eligibility which would pronounce that Mr. Obama is not now and never has been eligible to be president?
I know - even the author (Chris Ferrell at moral matters.org) states this as possibly being a "far-fetched scenario." However, all of the other cases that have been dismissed because of "lack of standing" apparently have resulted from a false concept (and type of cheating) used by attorneys and judges! It's all a smokescreen and just a canard!
Update: At Dictionary.com we have the word origin and history meaning of "canard":
If this doesn't pan out, then perhaps the release of the Fast and Furious documents might end up being his downfall?
Dangerous Gun Runner Eric Holder Says We Will Go After Gun Traffickers While He's Begging Court to Halt Fast and Furious Documents Release
Or, maybe the truth about Benghazi will finally come to light?
FBI Director Finally Gets Around to Looking at Benghazi
Or, maybe this:
Impeachment Coming If Obama Issues Exec Order
WHAT IS SHERIFF ARPAIO UP TO NOW? ...Still Proceeding
And all additional links.