Thursday, January 26, 2012

GA Hearing On Obama Ineligibility, Jan. 26, 2012 9:00 a.m. Eastern [Breaking News Update!!!]

Give Us Liberty blogspot has LOTS of information, partial transcripts, and BREAKING NEWS LIKE THIS:


I just got off the phone with Dean Haskins who was in the courtroom this morning assisting with the Art 2Pac live stream. Judge Malihi talked to the attorneys in chambers before the hearing this morning and told them that he was going to enter a DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Obama and recommend that Obama's name not be on the Georgia ballot! All of the attorneys expressed a desire to put an abbreviated streamlined case on the record and the judge agreed.

How does the mainstream media spin this?

The Georgia SOS has already indicated that he will follow the judge's recommendation. That means that Obama will not get any popular vote or electors from the great state of Georgia!
Congratulations to all freedom-loving Americans!

Posted by giveusliberty1776 at 9:58 AM 0 comments

Doug Vogt just called and said that the judge offered Orly a summary judgement and the hearing would not be necessary ... but of course she wanted to present it anyway to get this evidence before the public.

Now lets see what the CIA allows the mainstream media to publish. In other words the good news is that the judge will recommend that Obama not be permitted on the Georgia primary ballot in March.

More than 15,000 concerned citizens were online watching and listening to the hearing!

It has been difficult for people to get onto the Post & Email website.


 Via the Give Us Liberty blog, here is what is posted:

Judge Michael Malihi is presiding over the Obama ballot challenges being heard today in Atlanta, GA
(Jan. 26, 2012) — The court convened at approximately 9:30 a.m.  Judge Michael Malihi began by asking those present to stand and reading the last paragraph of Atty. Michael Jablonski’s letter to Brian Kemp, Georgia Secretary of State, “into the record,” commenting that Jablonski was not present at the hearing.
The judge called plaintiff David Welden to stand and asked where he resided and if he were a registered voter in the state of Georgia.  Then his attorney, Van Irion, stood and stated that there were three types of citizenship in the United States.  He then provided argument on the definition of “natural born Citizen,” referring to Minor v. Happersett.
“The court should recognize that the term ‘citizen” is not ‘natural born Citizen,’ Irion said. “The Minor court’s definition of ‘natural born Citizen’ says ‘parents.’
“In closing, this case is about the Constitution,” Irion said. We’ve shown that Barack Obama’s father was never a citizen…and that means he is not constitutionally qualified…Finally, the defendant was ordered to be here, and I wish to state on the record that that shows not just a contempt for this court…”
Then Irion was interrupted and stopped speaking.
9:54 a.m.:  Atty. J. Mark Hatfield stood and stating that he represents Kevin Richard Powell and Carl Swensson.  Hatfield mentioned the White House schedule as he saw that it related to Obama’s lack of attendance at the hearing.
Carl Swensson was sworn in at 9:56 a.m. and stated his residence and county.  Then Kevin Powell was asked the same.  Both were asked if they were able to vote for President of the United States.
Swensson and Powell explained their challenges filed with the Secretary of State’s office to the judge.
Hatfield held up the Certification of Nomination which Nancy Pelosi signed in 2008 to place Obama’s name on the ballot.  The judge asked if it was a “certified copy,” and Hatfield answered that it was.  He then read from it, stating that it did not affirm that the candidates met constitutional requirements to serve, while the wording from the Republican National Committee for its candidates did contain that wording.
The judge asked if the documents were from a “United States government source,” and Hatfield answered “Yes, sir, they were.”
Hatfield cited Jablonski’s January 25 letter “indicating that they did not want the proceedings to go forward and did not want to participate.”  Hatfield also entered into evidence Obama’s book, Dreams From My Father.
Ken Allen, a resident of Arizona, stood to present the documentation he had received from the State Department after submitting a FOIA request early in 2009, which The Post & Email reported on here.  He stated that “Barack Obama Sr.” was “never a citizen.”
At 10:09 a.m. someone said, “Let’s take a short break,” and people stood up and began moving around and talking with one another.
At 10:17 a.m., the court was called back in to order.
Atty. Orly Taitz was called upon to speak.  The Georgia registered voter whom she represents, David Farrar, stood and identified himself.
Taitz utilized a projector on the wall to the right of the judge as an aid in her presentation.  She then stated that evidence existed that Obama possessed Indonesian citizenship, to which the judge was heard by this writer to say, “That’s not relevant.”  Taitz then discussed the court’s decision in Minor v. Happersett and was interrupted by the judge, who said, “Counselor, can you save your argument for the closing?”  She then stopped speaking.
Mr. Christopher Strunk of New York then went up to the front of the courtroom to testify, and Taitz began to ask him questions about the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham, one of which contains the name “Soebarkah.”  Strunk stated, “She wanted that expunged from her record, but we never got that.”
Susan Daniels, Private Investigator from Ohio, then took the stand, and spoke about her investigation which revealed that Obama had reportedly been using a social security number which she contended had not been assigned to him.
Taitz asked Daniels, “What was the social security number attached to your request?” and Daniels read off “042-68-4425.”  Daniels said, “In all my years, I’ve never seen anything like this.”  She stated that the person who had originally owned the number had been born in 1890.
“First I ran the social security number to check the address, and the same number came up for him in Massachusetts, Illinois, and Washington, DC.  It showed a phone number, and it was always the same number…It would show intermittently ‘August 4, 1961′ and ’1890.’”

Also see: The National Patriot blog:




The live video stream is located on this page and on the home-page of [the] website.

Please see [their] press release for complete details.

There are also two backup links for the live stream at the first link above.

Also see:

Re: Call-In on January 23, 2012 by Neil Turner - RE: GA HEARING ON OBAMA INELIGIBILITY ON 26 JAN 2012 by Neil Turner (Jan. 26, 2012) — [Editor's Note: This article is a follow-up to Mr. Turner's telephone call...

A must see and read in the news today!   Recall how so many of the far leftist loons (including the media of mass deception, of course) stated that Glenn Beck was "crazy," spreading "lies about George Soros," a "fear monger" etc.?  Well take a look at the GeorgEVIL's latest rant in the links below.  But since Soros is a calculating liar, it's difficult to trust anything he says!

Evidence, George Soros’ Prediction of ‘Evil’ in America is Self-Fulfilling Prophecy - By: James Simpson Gulag Bound Generally speaking, George Soros cannot be trusted with anything he says. He is a calculating liar, and not nearly as smart a...
12 hours ago
Re: Call-In on January 23, 2012 by Neil Turner - RE: GA HEARING ON OBAMA INELIGIBILITY ON 26 JAN 2012 by Neil Turner (Jan. 26, 2012) — [Editor's Note: This article is a follow-up to Mr. Turner's telephon...
For more background information about this hearing, please see:

GA Secretary of State warns Obama, Brian P. Kemp cautions Obama attorney Michael Jablonski, Georgia ballot challenges, Natural born citizen deficiency - GA Secretary of State warns Obama, Brian P. Kemp cautions Obama attorney Michael Jablonski, Georgia ballot challenges, Natural born citizen deficiency “Why...

Protein Wisdom asks:

protein wisdom

  • See why so many are claiming that the online BC is a forgery!

    Over one million hits - Obama Birth Certificate Faked In Adobe Illustrator - Official Proof 1 ( Layers ) -

    I am looking forward to getting my copy of Mark Levin's new book, "Ameritopia."  See:

    Mark Levin Talks to NewsBusters About 'Ameritopia' and Media's Role in Advancing Utopianism


    Update during break (10:10 a.m. Eastern).

    Obama and his counsel did not show up at the hearings.  They are in contempt of court.

    Two lawyers gave uncontested evidence through paperwork from the FOIA and from plaintiffs and witnesses, that Barack Hussein Obama's father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.  The first lawyer explained that the case of  Minor vs. Happerstett (sp?) defines what is required for natural born citizen status.  It includes the need for TWO CITIZEN PARENTS.  The documents contain the PLURAL - PARENTS, so the Supreme Court has already defined what natural born citizen status means.  The same lawyer pointed out the the Won Kim Ark case was to determine U.S. Citizen status - but did not negate the fact that in the Minor case, natural born citizen status was never changed.

    One lawyer brought forth evidence that the Democratic National Committee, in 2008, had two documents that differed in their wording for the nomination of Barack Hussein Obama to run for POTUS.  One of them left out the sentence that claims his status would be constitutional.

    Court back in session. 10:16 a.m.

    Orly Taitz speaking.

    She attempted to show a video to the judge and courtroom, but the judge said that it wasn't relevant to this case.  He asked her to speak her argument.  He then stopped her once again.  Judge sounded and looked visibly annoyed.

    It looked like the other lawyers left the courtroom!

    Orly called a witness.

    They are discussing the name of "Soebarkah" for her son, Barack Hussein Obama, on the last passport of Stanley Ann Obama - in which it was crossed out indicating the desire to remove the name.

    The next witness has been called - a private investigator.  Hired to look into his background.  Discussing the social security number issued to him from Connecticut.  Professional understanding of this?  She knew it was fraudulent.  The person who originally had the SS# was born in 1890.  She believed that the number was fraudulent.  Investigator ran SS# and addresses showed up in different places.  Ran the phone number, and came up with deceased people.  SS# was issued in March, 1977 - when Obama was 15.

    Calling another witness.  He is involved in information technology.  Adobe software.  Describes what software he using in his work.  Discussing BC Obama posted online.  When opened document - saw multiple layers on birth certificate.  There were items from different documents layered together. 

    Now talking about the second BC posted in April, 2011.  Showing images of the document and discussing numbers.  After a day, it was not flattened and no one could see the SS# anymore.

    New witness.

    Document of Obama's tax return discussing SS# on it. 

    It was found that there was a discrepancy in the record.  The SS# was not verified by E-Verify.  Affidavit of witness that the SS# of Obama was not verified by E-Verify.

    Next witness.  Mr. Bogt.

    He owns a company that sells document imaging scanners.  Been in business for 18 years.  Did he exam alleged BC that was posted online by BHO.  He did.  She asks what he found.  Asking if there was haloing around the letters.  Didn't know what it was until they replicated the form.  Done in photoshop.  If a document like this has any incident of such imaging - it is a fraud.  Discussion of this continuing. 

    The originals were in books.  Would you have sloping of the lines from a scanner?  Yes.  Evidence of this is how they copied it.  If it was on a flatbed of a piece of paper, there wouldn't be any sloping.

    Now discussing more irregularities with the scanned document.    Discussing the stamp on the document.  It is difficult to understand Orly.  Asks if this looks like a document typed in 1961.  Typewriters in the 1960's would be spaced evenly - the letter spaces were off.

    The witness is now discussing that birth certificate numbers have to be sequential.

    Another witness.  Describing background in education in criminal justice.  Was police officer.  Hired by INS.  Received on the job training at Kennedy airport.  Worked on documents for immigration fraud.  In 1985 worked with Homeland Security agency.

    He has testified re:  deportation.

    November, 2009 was self-employed with own consulting firm.  When he ran SS# through commercial database, the only person who was assigned to SS# was BHO.  Other background info showed SS# was assigned in 1977 and assigned to someone in Connecticut.  Did BHO live there?  No.  He was in Hawaii living with grandparents.

    Three issues with SS# -
    Serial numbers of Nordyke twins born before Obama were out of sequence.

    Witness recommends further investigation. 

    Discussing Lolo Soetoro adoption of Obama and immigration records.  They redacted some of the documents due to privacy act.  Immigration records of Soetoro.  Discussing immigration records. 

    He wouldn't need immigration records to enter back into U.S. if he was a U.S. Citizen.  Warrants further investigation.  Recommends what to do.

    Witness discussing criminal investigation.  If not done, then discussing falsely claiming if a U.S. Citizen.  Removal proceedings to determine if individual would be held or released on his own recognisance.

    Would be seeking a warrant for arrest and seeking others involved with this alleged illegal activity.

    Taitz's closing argument.

    Discussing records.  Indonesia records stated that Mr. Obama went to school Jan. 1, 1968 and showed a picture.  In 1969, shows he was in U.S. too.

    Judge asked if she was "testifying."  She said she would, took the oath and took the stand.

    She is now testifying under oath. 

    She is discussing Obama's records as a lawyer.

    Judge asked how this was relevant.

    She said he is hiding records.

    Asked her to submit her testimony in writing.

    Asked her to present closing argument.

    It is difficult to understand what she is saying.  But she is saying that the plaintiffs are fighting for their right to be heard on this issue.  Discussing forgeries.  Discussing that documents and history of Obama has been changed.  Mr. Obama should be declared ineligible.  Obama is using computerized images.  Stolen SS# - that's fraud.  He is illegally occupying the White House. 

    I left proceeding briefly.

    She also said that Mr. Obama is in contempt of court.

    Judge thanked Orly and is taking documents.

    Judge:  This concludes the hearing.  Have a good day.

    [Note:  Will check back to see if entire hearing will be available to view online.  Hopefully, a transcript will eventually be available as well.]

    Update:  Interviews of witnesses/attendees going on [11:16 a.m.]

    Only one witness, a woman who discovered the fraudulent use of the SS#  that was originally issued to a (now deceased) person in 1890 stated how she found out the information and that she has been waiting 2 1/2 years to tell her story.


    It looks like the archived video will be posted here later today:
    Article II


    “First I ran the social security number to check the address, and the same number came up for him in Massachusetts, Illinois, and Washington, DC.  It showed a phone number, and it was always the same number…It would show intermittently ‘August 4, 1961′ and ’1890.’”  Daniels stated that she obtained information “directly from the Social Security Administration.”
    At 10:30 Mr. Chito Papa took the stand.  He stated that he works in the field of Information Technology including Adobe® software.
    Taitz asked Papa if the “birth certificate” which “Obama posted online” had flattened layers.  ”Did you see one layer or multiple layers? Taitz asked.  ”I saw multiple layers,” he answered.
    Taitz asked Papa about Obama’s social security number which appeared on his tax return posted on the internet, and Papa stated that the layers had not been flattened.  Taitz then thanked Papa for his testimony.
    At 10:36 a.m. another witness, Linda Jordan, was called to the stand.  Taitz adjusted her Powerpoint presentation by means of a laptop computer and began by asking a question about “E-Verify,” the U.S. government’s system for flagging potential illegal immigrants from working.  Jordan stated that she ran Obama’s number through the E-Verify system and said, “When I read it, it was 2011, and it could not verify it.  It came back.”
    At 10:39 a.m., Douglas Vogt took the stand.  Vogt stated that he owns a typesetting company and has been “in the business for 18 years now.”
    Taitz asked Vogt if he examined the birth certificate which was posted online, and he said, “Yes, I did.”

    No comments: