Obama Must Think He Is Above the Law [Update #2 - Court videos!]

The aftermath of the hearing in Georgia where a decision will eventually be rendered regarding whether or not Barack Hussein Obama is eligible to be placed on the 2012 election ballot in that state has, unfortunately, already shown us two things:

1. Obama must think that he is above the law.


2. And, as the following post over at American Thinker indicates:

Obama has deliberately turned his back, and walked on by.


And most of the media has followed along right behind him.

Quote from:

Georgia Ballot Challenge: Obama Walks On By

posted by null at American Thinker - 57 minutes ago

Two reports from yesterday's hearing in Georgia over Obama's eligibility for the presidential ballot.

More blogposts to read about the Georgia hearing:

Maggie's Notebook | America is the force that defeated communism and all those who would put the human soul itself into bondage. Ronald Reagan

Citizenship - Georgia citizens today delivered sworn testimony to a court that Barack Obama is slam-dunk disqualified from having his name on the 2012 presidential ballot...

Click here to read Maggie's Notebook - Citizenship post!

Commieblaster.com has a good roundup of links (including a link to Talk Wisdom in the "Lots of News Reports" link!):

Obama Ineligibility Hearing
- We Won! (Default Judgement)
- Lots of News Reports
- Court Details
- Local News Report
- Corsi: "Slam Dunk"
- Open Defiance of Law
- Packed Courtroom
- God Bless Georgia!Media Silent... Crickets Chirping

Also see:

We The People: Obama & his Attorney fail to appear for Trial — 2 Hour Hearing provides Strong Evidence that Obama is not qualified for Ballot


Despite the fact that much of the media of mass deception was AWOL about this topic yesterday, the blogosphere was on fire with millions of people doing searches to find out about this court case, what was said in the courtroom and to review the evidence presented against Obama. Even Talk Wisdom's blog stats were more than tripled yesterday.

Total page views 957 11 (1.14 %)
Total visitors 728 9 (1.23 %)
Total new visitors 644 0 (1.39 %)

However, I discovered something that was very odd over at my Histats page. Throughout the day, the stats that tracked where the website links came from to reach my blog, and even the search engine stats were being deleted from my personal stat page! Does anyone have an explanation for this? Highly disturbing!!


Here is how the Histats compilation ended up yesterday.

1. See above - total page views etc.

2. nz): lunatics- vent blog spot 1 1 1 1 - 100%


2 (com): awake pamphlet 1 1 1 1 - 100%


3 (com): obama eligibility case georgia ballot 1 1 1 1 - 100%


4 : funny obama birth certificate photoshopped 1 1 1 1 - 100%


5 (com): sharing the bread 1 1 1 1 - 100%


6 (com): jay leno jack taylor 1 1 2 2 1'15" 0%


7 (com): obama eligibility case georgia 1 1 2 2 2'6" 0%

3. Referrer websites:

www.commieblaster.com
2 2 2 1 - 100%


2 commieblaster.com
1 1 1 1 - 100%

3 citizenwells.wordpress.com

Isn't it odd that those stats are so low when the total amount of visitor was 728 yesterday???


So my question is, who was erasing those stats from my Histats site??


Here is an example of today at only 6:06 a.m. PT:

Total page views 100 52 (52 %)
Total visitors 81 42 (51.85 %)
Total new visitors 71 41

1 citizenwells.wordpress.com
12 12 12 1 - 100%


2 www.commieblaster.com
12 12 18 1.5 11'11" 66.7%


3 commieblaster.com
9 9 9 1 - 100%


4 beforeitsnews.com
4 4 5 1.2 7'11" 75%


5 romanticpoet.wordpress.com
0 1 1 1 - 100%


6 www.blogger.com
1 1 4 4 7'22" 0%


7 192.168.228.55:9090
1 1 1 1 - 100%


8 www.facebook.com
1 1 1 1 - 100%

9 wtpotus.wordpress.com

com): obama case in georgia 2 2 2 1 - 100%


2 (com): soebarkah 2 2 4 2 1'52" 50%


3 (ca): obama court case 1 1 1 1 - 100%


4 (com): georgia news obama 1 1 1 1 - 100%


5 : obama has been stopped by judge malihi 1 1 1 1 - 100%


6 (com): satan's favourite tool 1 1 1 1 - 100%


7 (com): obama georgia summary judgement 1 1 1 1 - 100%


8 (com): obama eligibility georgia case 0 1 1 1 - 100%


9 (com): obama eligibility case georgia 1 1 1 1 - 100%


10 (com): david jeremiah on president obama 1 1 1 1 - 100%


11 (com): president obama goes to speak with judge malihi 1 1 1 1 - 100%


12 (com): update obama contempt of court 2012 1 1 2 2 17'41" 0%


13 (com): jay leno 7 year old youtube jack taylor 1 1 1 1 - 100%


14 (com): obama georgia court case news 1 1 1 1 - 100%


15 (uk): rosie and jim tin foil 1 1 1 1 - 100%
*******

I know, stats are boring!! But I wanted to show readers here what happened on that page yesterday. Who was doing such a thing? I guess the Obots were out in force yesterday, deleting what links they could find about the Georgia case from the stats site? Perhaps they aren't awake yet this morning so the stats are (so far) untouched?

*******
Lastly, I'd like to repost and share a great comment that was posted in my previous blogpost:

MichaelIsGreat said...
The issue is quite simple. To be President of the USA or to run for the Presidency of the USA, Obama must be a "natural born citizen" according to the Constitution of the USA. The term "natural born citizen" has been defined previously and it requires two conditions:
1) Obama must be born in the USA.
The forged document provided by the White House web site of Obama's supposedly long form birth certificate is simply that, a bad forgery!
Therefore, the only way to check this long form birth certificate is to go to Hawaii and to check directly the original long form birth certificate and in particular to assess if even this original is genuine that is if it is not also a forgery!!
2) Obama's parents MUST BOTH be American citizens.
We know that Obama's father was a Kenyan and that he NEVER was an American citizen!!!!!
Therefore, THIS SECOND CONDITION ALONE DISQUALIFIES OBAMA TO RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA AND IT ALSO DISQUALIFIES OBAMA TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA, NO MATTER THE FACT THAT HE WON THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION!!!!!!


Furthermore, Obama was confronted with the definition of what a "natural born citizen" is when he directly participated in the investigation of John McCain's eligibility to run for the Presidency of the USA. Obama then signed Senate Resolution 511 from April 30, 2008 that reveals the indispensable requirement of having two US citizen parents in order to be a "natural born citizen" according to the Constitution of the USA and therefore to be eligible to run for the Presidency of the USA or to be President of the USA!!!!!
Therefore, once again, Obama knew very well that he FRAUDULENTLY decided to run for the Presidency of the USA despite the fact that he knew perfectly well that he was NOT a natural born citizen and therefore that he was not entitled, according to the Constitution of the USA, to be President of the USA.


First Conclusion:
---Obama is NOT a natural born citizen and therefore he is not entitled to run for the Presidency of the USA nor is he entitled to be President of the USA, no matter the fact that he won the Presidential election!!!!
---Finally, Obama is a former lawyer and therefore OBAMA CONSCIOUSLY, INTENTIONALLY COMPLETELY DECEIVED THE ENTIRE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY RUNNING FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA WHEN HE KNEW PERFECTLY WELL THAT HE WAS NOT ENTITLED TO DO SO SIMPLY BECAUSE HE KNEW VERY WELL THAT HE WAS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, AS THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA REQUIRES ONLY ON THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA!!!!
---THIS HUGE DECEPTION IS MORE THAN A FRAUDULENT ACT, IT IS WORSE THAN ANYTHING IMAGINABLE BECAUSE:
1) IT RELATES TO THE HIGHEST POSITION IN THE LAND, THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA, THAT OBAMA HAS FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED;
2) IT RELATES TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA BEING TRAMPLED UPON FRAUDULENTLY AND ILLEGALLY BY OBAMA;
3) IT RELATES TO THE FACT THAT OBAMA INTENTIONALLY DECEIVED AND MISLED THE ENTIRE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!
ANY PERSON GUILTY OF SUCH SERIOUS FRAUD SHOULD AT LEAST GET A JAIL SENTENCE, NO MATTER THAT OBAMA HAS FRAUDULENTY HELD THE POSITION OF PRESIDENT OF THE USA FOR A PERIOD OF TIME!!!


If you really want to have an expert legal explanation on what a "natural born citizen" truly is according to the Constitution of the USA and why legally speaking it is this way, then I suggest that you read at least a few articles on Attorney Mario Apuzzo's web site "Natural Born Citizen - A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers" at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
In particular, read:
---"The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth" at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/natural-born-citizen-clause-requires.html


January 27, 2012 5:11:00 AM PST

My reply:

Christinewjc said...
MichaelIsGreat,


Thank you so much for stopping by and presenting a precise evaluation of what is at stake concerning Obama's ineligibility. I have visited (and commented) at Mario's blog over the past 3 years as I watched the lawsuits against Obama get dismissed via stupid reasons like the plaintiff(s) not having "standing." I was so glad to see this particular case go forward on the merits, and the evidence has finally been presented in a court of law and is now out there for all to see!


Unfortunately, the media is holding back on spreading this historically important information that was presented at the hearing. My question is why? Why isn't this information going viral? Answer: because we have a media of mass deception that will protect Obama no matter how devastating the facts are about him being a usurper and NOT ELIGIBLE to be POTUS!!


I find all of this highly disturbing - even frightening! What and who are the "powers that be" that could have such far and wide power to squelch such monumental FACTS in order to keep someone (who should be in jail and charged with treason against our country), who is posing as president ILLEGALLY in our nation's capital?? We have someone who is not eligible for the position of POTUS doing everything that he and his puppetmasters want to do to destroy our country! Our nation is being summarily dismantled militarily, torn down deliberately, destroyed right out in the open by trashing our Constitution, ruining the U.S. economically (and on purpose!) by trampling on the rights of the American people!! How is it possible that all of this treasonous, traitorous, fraudulent activity is happening (in so many ways) that it is inconceivable to those who KNOW what is happening to let it go on and on without Obama and his ilk being arrested??


I suppose that I need to be more patient and let this thing play out over the course of time. I just worry that we are running out of time and the Marxist regime taking hold in our country will pull a stunt - like a false flag crisis again - and end up cancelling the election or even something much, much, worse!


I have been reading some excellent follow-up articles re: the Georgia hearing online this morning. They will be included in my next post.


Thanks again for your excellent comment. I appreciate your stopping by and explaining to readers here just how very important and crucial that hearing was! The interest in this topic is immense in the blogosphere. The more people who learn about it - the better. It can't continue to be hidden from the general public forever! And I continue to pray that something is done to IMMEDIATELY remove Obama from office!


January 27, 2012 5:47:00 AM PST

Hat tips to all links.

*******

Update @ 8:23 a.m. PT:

Please read the following article:

WND: Obama accused of disrespecting court, state, Americans.

Excerpts:


Scary thought:

“My personal belief is that if the U.S. Supreme Court held that he was ineligible, he might simply ignore the ruling, and test the will of the nation, just as he is testing the will of the state of Georgia,” he [Donofrio]said.

The arrogance of ObaMAO admin. is evident; but hopefully, the outcome of it all will be closer to what is said here:

The White House today was absolutely silent about the issue. The Georgia case is far different from the lawsuits over the 2008 election, in which judges virtually unanimously ruled that they could not make a decision that would remove a sitting president, no matter the circumstances.


This hearing was about concerns being raised, as allowed by Georgia state law, that Obama is not eligible for the office of president and therefore should not be allowed on the 2012 election ballot.


“If the judge’s recommendation – and I’ve been told that it’s going to be to disqualify Mr. Obama as a candidate – is followed by the secretary of state, Mr. Obama has got a real problem,” said Gary Kreep, of the United States Justice Foundation.


His organization pursued several of the lawsuits over Obama’s occupancy of the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court, where the justices simply decided they wouldn’t be bothered with such issues as the constitutional eligibility of a president.


“He’s thumbed his nose at the court. He’s thumbed his nose at the secretary of state in Georgia. He’s thumbed his nose at the people and said, ‘I’m above it all. I’m above the law,’” Kreep said.


Kreep’s cases have outlined out there is precedent in the U.S. for the removal of a sitting chief executive because of an issue over ineligibility.

UPDATE # 2:




I finally found a blog with a series of videos covering the Georgia hearing yesterday:


Conservative Blogs Central. [Note: Scroll down to videos.]


The audio is a bit garbled, but if you listen carefully you can hear what is going on.

Excerpt from text at site link above:

From Plaintiff, in one of the Georgia challenges, Carl Swensson: To all my friends in battle,


The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there. We argued that all the evidence needed to be entered in to record so the Judge allowed for a speedy hearing where all evidence was entered into the court record. What that means is this… Any appeal, if one is even possible, would be based on the evidence provided by the lawyers in each case. Both Van Irion and My lawyer, Mark Hatfield made certain that our cases and evidence in those two cases would be closed so as not to be affiliated, in any way, with “Birther” Orly Taitz. As expected, she was an embarrassment.


Now we’re merely awaiting the publishing of this Judge’s ruling which, as previously stated, will be a Default Judgment. - Carl

I agree that it was a good thing to separate the first two plaintiffs from the plaintiff who was represented by Orly Taitz.  I applaud the woman for her hard work on this issue, but she has been an embarrassment and distraction in previous cases as well as at this hearing.  It may be due to the fact she is "green" at being a lawyer and/or that English is her third language.  While watching the hearing yesterday, the first two lawyers left the courtroom before Orly presented her case.  The judge in this case appeared to be visibly annoyed at some of what Taitz tried to do in the courtroom.