Wednesday, February 11, 2009

StimuWASTE & Flight 93 Memorial Outrage!

Dear Talk Wisdom readers - pardon my absence from blogging over the past few days. An explanation will be revealed shortly.

In the previous comment thread, "John" made a comment that WorldNetDaily is not a place to find truthful news and commentary. I just had to laugh! Then I replied:

Just because you don't agree with the political opinions and facts shared by World Net Daily, doesn't necessarily mean what they report on is not true.

The Lamestream media didn't vet Obama properly. Now we have a Muslim sympathizer who is regarded as weak by Iran. He is also clueless about Gitmo - signing a exec. order to close it without knowing where to put the prisoners. I vote Alcatraz! Let Nancy PeLIARsi's district take care of 'em all!

ObamALINSKY is trying to turn our nation into a socialist country. The StimuWASTE bill that he and the Dem majority are trying to shove down taxpayer's throats is RIDICULOUS! The pork added on to please all of those groups (like ACORN) that got Obama elected is absolutely shameful!

What else? How about the fact that it was revealed on Greta's show tonight that 2 billion is being given to Chicago for a nuclear plant??? It's a pet project of Durbin and Obama - something they have been trying to get for years. So...just how does THAT create jobs and give tax relief?

If the truth be told, Obama is a LIAR. He claimed that there is "no pork" in the bill. Bald-faced lie!!

Conclusion: People will get more truth from WND than Obama - that's a fact.

As if the StimuWASTE bill isn't enough for clear thinking Americans to be outraged about, we also have to fight against the awful design chosen for the Flight 93 Memorial!!

The Nice Deb blog shared the following information and blogburst links to additional blogs covering this very important issue!

Copy of Nice Deb's post:

Flight 93 Memorial Blogburst #55

February, 11, 2009 — nicedeb

Memorial Project officials insist that it was the passengers and crew, not the terrorists, who broke the peace on 9/11

The official explanation for the Crescent of Embrace design is that the path of Flight 93 breaks the circle, turning it into the giant crescent. They call it the Circle of Embrace now, but the Memorial Project’s own website acknowledges that the circle is still broken:

In summary, the memorial is shaped in a circular fashion, and the circle is symbolically “broken” or missing trees in two places, depicting the flight path of the plane, and the crash site…

The fact that the Circle of Embrace is really a broken circle means two things. First, it means that the giant crescent is still there. Architect Paul Murdoch always described the Crescent of Embrace as a broken circle. Our circle of peace was broken on 9/11, with the unbroken part of the circle, what was symbolically left standing in the wake of 9/11, being the giant Islamic shaped crescent.

Adding an extra arc of trees that explicitly represents a broken off part of the circle leaves the unbroken part unchanged. What is symbolically left standing on the Flight 93 crash site is still a giant Islamic-shaped crescent, still pointing to Mecca.

This prompts the question of WHO is being depicted as breaking the circle of peace on 9/11. Of course it can only be the terrorists. Who else can be charged with breaking the peace? The murdered passengers and crew?

Once you realize that it can only be the terrorists who are being depicted as turning the circle into a crescent, it is obvious that this is actually a memorial to the terrorists (if that wasn’t obvious enough already from the Crescent name and the crescent and star flag configuration).
The Memorial Project finally answers our question: insists that it was the passengers and crew who broke the circle

Last spring a couple hundred emailers (thanks!) demanded to know “Who broke the circle?” The Memorial Project issued a boiler-plate response that never got around to answering the question. At the Memorial Project meeting last summer, however, Alec Rawls was able to pigeon-hole Memorial Project Manager Jeff Reinbold and Deputy Superintendent Keith Newlin.

“You can’t just say it was ‘the flight path’ that broke the circle” Rawls admonished. “This is a story of human action. So who did it? In your depiction, who is breaking the circle?”

“The passengers and crew,” said Reinbold.

“But the circle is a symbol of peace,” Rawls continued. “Who broke the peace? It was the TERRORISTS who broke the peace on 9/11.”

Reinbold countered that that the circle is also a Druid symbol, and a Christian symbol.

“But it is still a symbol of peace,” said Rawls, especially as the Memorial Project is using it, with the circle being broken on 9/11, “so who breaks it?”

“It was the passengers and crew,” Newlin repeated, elaborating that: “They are the one’s who brought the plane down.”

“You don’t think it was the terrorists who broke the peace?” Rawls asked.

“They TRIED to break the peace,” said Newlin, “but they failed.”

“Really?” asked Rawls: “They failed to break the peace? What about the 40 murdered heroes?” But Reinbold and Newlin were done talking.

Trying to give credit to the passengers and crew for the outcome of Flight 93 is a perfectly creditable motive on the part of Reinbold and Newlin. They aren’t actually trying to blame the passengers and crew for 9/11. What is shameful is their absolute determination not to admit what they perfectly well understand: that it was the terrorists that broke the peace on 9/11.

If they admit this, then they have to acknowledge that Murdoch’s design can only be a memorial to the terrorists, who are depicted as breaking our peaceful circle and turning it into a giant Islamic-shaped crescent. The depth of Reinbold’s and Newlin’s determination not to admit that it was the terrorists who broke the peace is a measure of how clearly they understand the terrorist-memorializing implications.

They KNOW that this is a memorial to the terrorists, and are twisting themselves into knots to try to cover it up.

Not just a memorial to the terrorists, but victory for the terrorists

If the crescent/broken-circle design is built, it will turn Flight 93 into a victory for the 9/11 terrorists. They will actually have succeeded (with the help of architect Paul Murdoch) in planting a giant Mecca-direction indicator (the central feature of a mosque) on the Flight 93 crash site.

This is how Islam claims territory: by building mosques. Saudi Arabia spent over a seventy-five billion dollars in the last forty years funding mosques and madrassas to spread its murder-cult brand of Islam around the globe. That’s where our present conflict with the Islamic world comes from: Saudi Arabia spreading the violent orthodoxy of Wahabbi Islam around the world.

Now we are poised to build the world’s largest mosque for them, a terrorist memorial mosque, dedicated to the Saudi terrorists who mass-murdered our own countrymen on 9/11, and the Memorial Project KNOWS it. They have to be exposed and stopped.

To join our blogbursts, just send your blog’s url.

If you want to fund an ad buy, contact Alec Rawls. Petition here.

My comment there:

I heard that the land has finally been sold by the original owner. Does this mean that this terrible design will be built there now? I am SO OUTRAGED about this! It is just unconcionable to me that such an obvious memorial "plan" is Islamic in so many ways within the design!

This is as awful as it would be to build a Nazi or Hamas sign somewhere in Israel!! Israel would NEVER STAND for such a thing! The United States of America - specifically - WE THE PEOPLE should NOT STAND FOR THIS!!!

People...are you OUTRAGED YET? If not, what would it take?
People...are you feeling REALLY CREEPED OUT about all of the pro-Islamic STUFF Obama is promoting since the usurper took office??

1. Exec. order to close Gitmo.

2. Halting the trials of the prisoners - including dropping the charges of the mastermind of the USS Cole bombing.

3. Obama's interview with a Muslim t.v. station upon becoming president (fraudulently, I might add) before he did any interviews with American reporters?

4. Willingness to "talk with Iran" without pre-conditions. Even the Iranian leaders are calling Obama weak!!

5. (I'm sure there are more examples and will add them.)


HT: Nice Deb's blog


1389 Blog - Antijihadist Tech A Defending Crusader A Fine Line Between Stupid and Clever A Liberal's Worst Nightmare ACT Golden Gate Al Salibiyyah All American Blogger Almost Midnight in the West American Commentaries And Rightly So Anne Arundel Maryland Politics apocryphal EVIDENCE ! ARRA News Service Atlas Shrugs Auntie Coosa Campfire Journal Bare Naked Islam Battle Dress U Because I'm Right Best Destiny Big Dog's Weblog Big Sibling Blackboot Jacks blogito, ergo, sum Bob McCarty Writes Boston Maggie Cao2's Weblog Cao's Blog Chaotic Synaptic Activity Chester Street Chicago Ray Christmas Ghost Classic Liberal Clay Ritter Clay's Rants and Musings Cocked and Loaded Colonel Robert Neville Always Dresses for Dinner Common Sense Junction Concrete Bob Covertress Creeping Sharia DC Protest Warrior Democrat = Socialist Dr. Bulldog and Ronin Error Theory EW1's Intercept Log Faultline USA Flanders Fields Flopping Aces Founding Fathers of the Vast Right Wing Four Pointer Francase Place Freedom's Enemies Freedom Warrior From My Position On the Way! Ft. Hard Knox Freedom Ain't Free Garbanzo Toons General Rachel's weblog GM's Corner Green Country Values Gunservatively Haid Dasalami Hard to Swallow Holger Awakens Hollywood Conservative Hoosier Army Mom Ironic Surrealism II Ivy League Conservatives Jack Lewis Jihad Press Jim-Rose - the Libertarian Popinjay Judge Right Just Barking Mad kae's bloodnut blog Kender's Musings Lemur King's Folly LGF 2.0: Little Green Blogmocracy Maggie's Notebook MELAMPUS'S MENAGERIE!!!! Miss Beth's Victory Dance Monkey in the Middle Muslims Against Sharia My Own Thoughts Neoconstant Nice Deb No Apology No Compromises When It Comes To Being Right! Noli insipientium iniurias pati Not A Sheep Old Soldier Ogre's Politics and Views Papa Mike's blog Part-Time Pundit Political Islam Protest The Church Protest The Left Publius' Forum Race, Politics, and Religion in the USA Republican Attack Machine Right on the Right Right Truth Ron's Musings Rosemary's Thoughts Sarah Palin in Español Seattle Express Sharia Finance Watch Sheepdog Barking Shot in the Dark Sad Old Goth Smooth Stone Space 4 Commerce by Brian Dunbar Stix Blog Stop the ACLU Teen Pundit the Avid Editor The Conservative Guy The Gadfly The Great Lie of Islam The Grid The Hinge of Fate Liberalguy The Loyal Eagles The Midnight Sun The Mountain The Paradigm Shift The Political Octagon The Renaissance Biologist The Sanity Sentinel The Sisyphus Files The Strata-Sphere The Truth of Islam The View From the Turret The Wide Awakes Talk Wisdom Thunder Run Tizona's Weblog Tough Girl 101 Traction Control United Conservatives War of 2 Worlds We Have Some Planes Yes, but can I dance to it?

1 comment:

Matt W. said...

I have to say that what worries me even more than the disgusting plans for the memorial to the terrorists (and you are correct, that is what it amounts to, as planned) is that they also seem to be saying that, in the wake of 9/11 the US will find itself a Muslim country! That is something that might not worry me if I didn't see so many instances where it is clearly being brought about.

If you are interested, there is a website where this is explained in detail (ie the Islamification of America.)