Saturday, September 09, 2006

Editing Out The Truth!

"You know the email that encouraged you to watch the mini-series "The Path to 9/11?" Well, the liberal media is now altering it so that the Clinton administration won't look bad. Apparently, Clinton carries weight in Hollywood. Now, that the show is a doctored lie...I can't recommend it. Sorry, I take it all back."

ABC Altering 9/11 Film After Clinton Officials Express Outrage
Friday, September 08, 2006
Fox News Story

My friend Dran sent me that email. She had originally emailed me and several others, recommending the 9/11 Miniseries that will be broadcast on Sunday, September 11th and Monday, September 12th, 2006. The Clintonites had a hissy fit and squawked so loudly, forcing ABC to edit out the truth of that administration's incompetence!

Darn it! I really wanted to see that scene where Sandy Berger pushes documents down his pants! He was caught removing highly classified terrorism documents before the Sept. 11 Commission hearings that generated the report used for the television program.

WorldNetDaily reports:

"Berger and his lawyer told reporters he knowingly removed handwritten notes he made while reading classified anti-terror documents at the archives by sticking them in his clothing. They said he also inadvertently took copies of actual classified documents in a leather portfolio."



Clinton aide says 9/11 film 'correct.' Producer consulted with military attaché who saw aborted attacks on bin Laden!

The truth has a way of coming out anyway. The Democrats may get their wish to have the film doctored to hide their ineptitude when they had several opportunities to get Bin Laden. As the best seller, Dereliction of Duty shows, when it comes to protecting our nation from attack, The Clinton administration failed miserably.

So now they want to hide their screwed up past? However, they have inadvertently drawn tons of attention to what they purposed to cover up! Plus, as can be seen from the WND article, they can't shut everyone up!



As if that isn't bad enough!

Senate Dems Threaten Disney's Broadcast License!


Serious Concerns


Coordinated Campaign to Attack the Film

Note: Go to above link at Independent Conservative's blogspot, click on link there - Hannity Speaks to “The Path to 9/11″ Writer Cyrus Nowrasteh (Audio) - to hear interview!


Michelle Malkin: "ABC" means Altered By Clinton!


Hot Air: Creeping Democrat Dementia


Video flashback: U.S. drone had Osama onscreen — in 2000


Miserable Failure: More Clinton Counterterror Catastrophes

6 comments:

limpy99 said...

Speaking of the truth coming to light, the Senate released one of the reports on their investigation into intelligence on the Iraq situation pre-invasion. Be careful about the Clinton attacks Christine. He certainly lied about his philandering, but as far as I know 2,200+ American soldiers aren't dead becuase of that.

Christinewjc said...

According to several press releases, this "docu-drama," (as it has been renamed because of Clinton et al complaints), isn't flattering to the Bush administration either. The difference is, President Bush isn't out there blasting Disney, ABC or the film's producer whereas Clinton is making an absolute idiot (IMO) of himself.

Limpy99: "He certainly lied about his philandering, but as far as I know 2,200+ American soldiers aren't dead becuase of that."

Maybe if Clinton wasn't so distracted by his private parts and having a sex act done on him at the White House while in office, he would have paid more attention to Osama Bin Laden and bombed that tyrant out of existence when he had a most opportune chance to do so (see the Hot Air video link). If Osama had been taken out back then, perhaps the entire 9/11 plot could have been foiled.

Then, perhaps, as you said, 2,200 + American soldiers would not have had to give their lives for the protection of our country and our way of life from terrorists who kill indescriminately and who are never going to "negotiate" any kind of peace plan.

Our men and women of the military are fighting bravely for the sake and safety of our country in both Afghanistan and Iraq.

It bothers me no end that the Democrats will do anything and say anything to undermine the war effort just because they hate Bush so much. I can't imagine that they don't realize how it hurts our troops fighting valiantly in this war.

Yeah...I know...free speech and whatnot. But utilizing our free speech rights in a responsible way is even more important now than ever before. The anti-war critics just don't get it. The result? They are giving more and more "ideology ammunition" to the terrorists and place our troops in even more danger by doing so. I think it's terrible...what they are saying against our war effort.

Jody said...

Maybe if Clinton wasn't so distracted by his private parts and having a sex act done on him at the White House while in office, he would have paid more attention to Osama Bin Laden...

"Everyone involved in the decision had, of course, been aware of President Clinton’s problems. He told them to ignore them. Berger recalled the President saying to him “that they are going to get crap either way, so they should do the right thing.” All his aides testified to us that they based their advice solely on national security considerations. We have found no reason to question their statements." --9/11 Commission Report, pg.118



The Clintonites had a hissy fit and squawked so loudly, forcing ABC to edit out the truth of that administration's incompetence!

Yeah, that Bill Bennet, Richard Minter, Frank Gaffney, FBI Agent James Bamford and those 9/11 Commission Members are all so damn partisan! They're all bad Democrats who---

What?

They're Republican or direct investigators of the disaster?

Oh.

limpy99 said...

Umm, the 2,200 I was referring to died in combat in Iraq. Which had nothing to do with 9/11.

Phronk said...

I dunno about the documentary that you're talking about, but here in Canada the CBC showed on called "The Secret History of 9/11" that made Clinton seem a bit foolish. Perhaps you'd like to seek that one out for a less biased perspective on the tragedy.

Of course, it made Bush seem foolish too, since his administration was, you know, directly incompetent on that day. Also interestng was the fact that they wanted to attack Iraq right away, even though it had nothing to do with the attack. WTF?

GMpilot said...

From the Chicago Sun-Times, 11 September:

Brent Bozell, founder of the right-wing Media Research Center, defending "The Path to 9/11" mini-series:

"Upfront the moviemakers note it has composite characters and manipulates the time of events for a better movie experience. As a 'docudrama,' it has taken certain poetic license with history."

Brent Bozell in 2003, criticizing "The Reagans" mini-series:

"There is no such thing as creative license to invent falsehoods about people. I don't care who you are. You don't have that right."

Hypocrisy, thy name is Republicanism. No wonder you love them so, hostess!