Friday, May 01, 2009

How Deep is the Obama Rabbit Hole?

While walking my dog yesterday, I started to pray. It was a prayer of anguish over the terrible direction that ObamaFRAUD and this dangerous Congress is taking our nation. I began to doubt that any of the dozens of lawsuits being filed against Obama would ever get a hearing.

People have been asking me what the delay is on the Obama citizenship issue. They, like me, cannot believe that NOT ONE CASE has been heard. Why is that? It isn't that the cases do not have merit. Can it be that the stalling tactics of Obama's team of lawyers has prevented all of the cases from getting a hearing? "I guess so" is my answer.

On Orly Taitz's blog, I have often seen her write that it will only take ONE CASE to get a hearing which will expose Obama for the fraud and usurper that he is. Once a judge orders proof of citizenship (via requiring Obama to show his vault-length COLB which he had sealed) in a court of law, his ability (or inability) to show, without a doubt, that he was (or wasn't) born in Hawaii will force a decision from the judge to charge him in whichever case brings them to that point.

It appears that the Kerchner v. Obama case brought by Mario Apuzzo has the best chance of ultimately getting a hearing. It is the one case that scares the Obamafraud team. Why do I know this? Because they are attempting to get more time before they answer the requirements of the case.

DefendUSx: Obama Eligibility case defendants (Obama and Congress) want a 117 days to respond - though court rules only grant a max of 60 days. They have already used one extension to delay the process.

Although the case raises many of the same questions as others, there are MANY defendents named in the case.


It was filed in January by attorney Mario Apuzzo of New Jersey on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. It names as defendants Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives and former Vice President Dick Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.


The ultimate questions remain unaddressed to date: Is Obama a natural born citizen, and, if so, why hasn't documentation been provided? And, of course, if he is not, what does it mean to the 2008 election or the U.S. Constitution if it is revealed that there has been a violation?

And the answer could take only minutes: authorization from the president to Hawaiian officials to release his documentation.

Apuzzo, on his website, says the issue "is of utmost national importance."

"Every passing day Mr. Obama takes executive action that significantly impacts on the lives of Americans." he said.

"This is enough time for them to answer. With an extension to June 21, 2009, USA and Obama are asking for 124 days and the Congressional defendants are asking for 117 days to answer. Court rules only allow them 60 days. Such delay is not in the national interest and not acceptable," he said.

He said that since the attorneys for the government earlier were granted extensions for Obama and Congress to respond, there should be no further delay, and the statements should be required May 5 as planned.

In a comments section on his website, a contributor told Apuzzo, "It's part of their stonewalling effort. They will do everything they can to stop or otherwise slow the path to justice down to snail's pace."

The FACT that Obama's father (if, in fact, his father was Barack Obama Sr.) was a Kenyan and never naturalized to the United States means that he and his son were British by birth.

Since the short form BC shown on has been found to be a forgery, the vault-length COLB would show whether or not Obama actually was born in Hawaii or Kenya. Even so, the FACT that his father was Kenyan means that Obama cannot be anything more than a naturalized citizen of the U.S. which is NOT the same as a "Natural Born Citizen" which is required for POTUS.

One commenter at the above site states:

The birth certificate of 1961 should not be the main focus.

British at birth.

His birth status was governed by British law.

How can British law govern the birth status of a natural born citizen of the USA?

because when O DOES produce a "bona fide" (and ink-dry) 1961 BC, the issue will be considered closed.

rxsid responded:

Ken Dunbar:

"The birth certificate of 1961 should not be the main focus."


"How can British law govern the birth status of a natural born citizen of the USA?"

It can't, obviously. This is, indeed the most important issue (his British citizenship) to focus on.

It is now being spread throughout the blogs that ObamaBots are working on forging a long-form COLB through the use of a 1961 Heidelberg printing press to make it look authentic. However, as the following commenter wrote, it may fool the public but not the experts.

Ann Fitz:

Another forgery will be exposed. No matter how they try, they can not carbon age paper or ink. But the process gives Obama more time to destroy America. However, he will never destroy Americans or the true spirit of freedom. Obama will cause hatred, which is already in the making, and cause chaos in the religious & financial segment, but he will never control the true Americans. Together we are united, apart we are more united than the world thinks. The heat is reaching a boiling point, and it won't be long before the pot boils over.

Another commenter named "Oldsalt76" from Citizen Wells blog [read that thread and the 760 comments if you want a REAL education on this issue] wrote:

oldsalt76 // April 20, 2009 at 3:27 pm

Having operated a lithographic commercial printing company for nearly 40 years of my life, without bragging I can say that I have learned a lot about papermaking, the various types of paper, and the different substances used in papermaking. Regarding the alleged perpetration to manufacture another counterfeit birth certificate it would seem that they looked stupid enough after the first one. Now like common criminals they think that they are smarter now, and everybody will be fooled. I have some news for the OBOT idiot, GOON SQUAD. You will not fool me. Until you have spent nearly 40 years in ALL phases of printing, learned about the various paper pulp constants, beating, blending, calendaring, and yes even aging, you will FAIL. There [are] certain chemicals which paper absorbs at a certain rate over a period of years. Trained paper aging [analysts] can often tell the age of paper even without special equipment. Anyone who believes that he can age new paper, by applying ultraviolet light and dampness variations, is a nitwit, and will FAIL. There is several other well known components of paper aging which I will not relate to, after all I have saved the most damning information for another day. Simple tests will reveal the truth quickly. This is all only one aspect of counterfeiting of documents. There is also the consideration whether the original was produced by letterpress, or on an offset press. I know exactly how to tell the difference. As do millions of other experienced commercial printers. If all else fails to prove the probability of counterfeiting of a document, you then simply seek out the exact same document from another source in the same geographical area. Then the paper analyst compares the acidity, oxidation, and the amount of a certain atmospheric element which penetrates paper at KNOWN rates, then by measuring the depth of penetration it is possible to tell the age of the paper in question. In short Obamas nitwit goon squad had better remain doing what they do best,which is INTIMIDATE, HARRASS, STEAL, LIE, BEAT ON PEOPLE, and possibly KILL PEOPLE. (Lt. Harris) perhaps! While you can synthetically make paper LOOK much older, unless you have a lifetime in papermaking it is IMPOSSIBLE TO AGE PAPER SYNTHETICALLY, and have it bear the same chemical signature found in the real thing. People who try this sort of thing are like dogs chasing their tail.
If an ALLEGED certified copy of Soetoro’s VAULT COLB should suddenly appear, after all the money that was spent to keep it hidden, I would tend to be extremely suspicious of it. I would require that a leading testing laboratory be consulted to verify the age of the paper. If that is suspect then it should be compared to another vault COLB of the same age, and issued by the same entity. If the chemical signature differs [radically], one of them is a phoney on new paper, which somebody tried to make look older. In short, a FORGERY. There is a lot more involved in this and any nationally recognized testing laboratory can READILY identify the phony VAULT COLB. It seems as though the Obama CRAZIES think that there is nobody else on earth who has any intelligence, and therefore everybody will believe their BULLSWH##. I can only say that it is obvious that they are really FULL OF IT! Apparently they are picking their noses too much. They have ingested too many of their BOOGERS. What else should we expect from an OBOT?
oldsalt76 // April 20, 2009 at 3:48 pm

I think that if the Obama GOON squad attempts to pass off a phoney COLB, Obama himself should be required to sign an affidavit guaranteeing the authenticity of the document, under penalty of fraud against the American people. He would be in violation of his oath of office and could be impeached, or removed from office under the 20th amendment. He could be forcefully removed if he is determined to be an invalid president.

So...could the ObamaBots even get away with something like that?

Back over at RepubX, a commenter had this to say:

@ ed:

I know that BHO will try to slam the door shut once a BC is produced. Why not instead of focusing on the BC itself, focus on the timing. BHO needs to answer the question; Why has it taken you over a year and $800,000 to produce a $10 piece of paper? All we need is a sliver of doubt with which to start building a house.

CDR Grimes

Since we are on the subject of forgeries, I want to revisit a previous post and shed some new light upon the subject.

In my post Why Were 5 Images Photoshopped? there was a question about the term "Ducky" being used in the Hexidecimal code. Since I'm not that computer code savvy, I believed an Obot who claimed that "the file was created by an Adobe program called Ducky." When I went back to that blog, I noticed that the comment section was closed after just one comment was posted:
The yearbook for Punahou in 1979 shows number 25 as another boy that looks remarkably similar to Barack Obama….the video on Youtube shows number 25 clearly making the basketball shots with the voice saying the over and over that it was Obama making the shots etc…….clearly a fraud. Why would someone go to lengths to show this video that Mr. Obama was playing basketball when it wasn’t him?

Comment by Mike Smith April 29, 2009

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Next, I went back over to the RepubX blog, DefendUSx wrote:

@ Ernest Serano:

Ernest, the Obots have changed the story about "Ducky" twice already. At first, they said it belonged to one user named Ducy having a single site, but that was shot down because the images were collected from multiple sites.

So, now the story is "Ducky" is a generic/standard Adobe tag appearing all JPEG images. Wrong! They do not appear in any JPEGS, only Obama's images. And ... these images posted here are GIFS, not JPEGs!

JFIF is a standard Adobe extenstion, but "Ducky" is not. Open any GIF images you have or even JPEGS, you will not see "Ducky" anywhere. Use Notepad, and do a search for "Ducky". You won't find it.

As always, trying to confuse people and steer them from the truth. Truth is, All Obama's images were a "campaign" released to the media (i.e. TV, Radio and Web sites) for distribution.

I thought - WOW - could this possibly be true? ALL of Obama's images just a campaign released to the media for distribution?

In my blog travels, I ran across this article:

Also see:

The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 6 Barack Obama: The Pictures Speak A Thousand Lies

It is strange to note that several of the photos (especially the color photos) in that post are missing. Scrubbed by ObamaBorg Bots? Who knows...

But take note of the author's conclusion:


By now, the reader will be asking more than a few questions. Why would anyone fake such important photographs, and how could they expect to get away with such a criminal act after all? The answers to those questions (and the others you may be asking yourself) are simple:

Obama and his New-World-Order handlers had no other choice. Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama, Jr. is, and has been, a fraud—from day one. That is what he is, and that is all he will ever be.

The powers-that-be, in their arrogant, psychopathic zeal, assume that a sufficient number of people have been adequately brainwashed to the extent that they will 'believe' anything. Many have believed the lies from the very beginning and likely still do. But the NWO types and their minions have severely miscalculated the sheer determination and conviction which drives those who relentlessly cast light on their dark deeds and on their evil plans for humanity.

The first step in accepting Barack Obama's promise for "change” is taken after accepting his fraudulent historical accounts, his fraudulent 'documentation', and now—his fraudulent Photoshop images. If you, the reader, can honestly look at any photographs of Barack Obama or his self-proclaimed international-bloodline stooges without a hint of suspicion regarding those photos’ origins, you have already experienced the "change" for which you have longed. You will have been blinded by the very darkness that follows him and those whose bidding he does.

The 'messiah' you have awaited has symbolicaly twisted the words which describe the True Messiah's "Immaculate Conception," into his own "immaculate deception." Satan, himself, would be proud of such a feat.

In summation, there remains no doubt, now, that the photographic biography of Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama, Jr. is as great a fiction as his own autobiographical accounts, whether in book, audio, video, online, or print-media format. Although these photos do not conclusively prove where Obama or his family were at any given point in time, they do prove where he—and they—were not.

Don Nicoloff

© Don Nicoloff / Direct Light Productions, 2009

Hat Tips:


The Idaho Observer: The Three Stooges go to Washington: Part 4 Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.: The Real Story

Don Nicoloff: The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 6 Barack Obama: The Pictures Speak A Thousand Lies

P.S. Perhaps this helps to explain why Obama has kept all of the following hidden:

What are they keeping silent about?

All of this:

Mr. Barack Hussein Obama -

The American People want to know, who sent you?

Obama has lived for 48 years without leaving any footprints -- none! There is no
Obama documentation -- no records -- no paper trail -- none -- this can't be an

Original, vault copy birth certificate -- Not released

Certificate of Live Birth -- Released -- Counterfeit

Obama/Dunham marriage license -- Not released

Soetoro/Dunham marriage license -- Not released

Soetoro adoption records -- Not released

Fransiskus Assisi School School application -- Released

Punahou School records -- Not released

Selective Service Registration -- Released -- Counterfeit

Occidental College records -- Not released

Passport (Pakistan) -- Not released

Columbia College records -- Not released

Columbia thesis -- Not released

Harvard College records -- Not released

Harvard Law Review articles -- None (maybe 1, unsigned?)

Baptism certificate -- None

Medical records -- Not released

Illinois State Senate records -- None

Illinois State Senate schedule -- Lost

Law practice client list -- Not released

University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None


Additional posts to read:

DefendUSx at RepubX: The real-deal about Obama and Congressional/Court Silence


Anonymous said...

I don't understand all of this melodrama with your prayers of anguish. It seems to me you already have your answer. Continuing to beg God for a different outcome is like a child begging his parent for 5 more minutes before bedtime. They were given an answer. Just because they didn't like it doesn't mean it's going to change.

It amazes me that you would never even consider that the reason there won't be a hearing is because there's no need for one. You wanted so much for a republican to be elected, even one who lies and commits adultery, that you've demonized anyone who isn't a republican. Of course you're not getting answers - you're not listening.

The president has an approval rating of over 63% - higher than both Bush and Clinton at this point in their presidencies. That rating includes 46% of republicans, and those numbers are up from just a month ago. They don't come from US media outlets either. Those are from Iranian news outlets. That way you can't blame it on the media too.

I feel very sorry for you. You've convinced yourself that there is some vast conspiracy involving thousands of people, and you've also convinced yourself that there is some mass movement to recall the president. You're wrong on both accounts. God gave you your answer. You just refuse to listen. Wonder how that's going to work for you.

I really feel bad for you. You're going to spend the next 4 years of your life bitter, angry and in anguish because you refuse to see that no mistakes have been made. Everything really is as He intended it. Read your blog posts for years back and read your new ones. You're not the same person, and the change hasn't been for the better.

Christinewjc said...

Anonymous -

Please see my new blog post for my reply.