Human Events: David Axelrod's Pattern of Sexual Misbehaviorby Ann Coulter.
Copy of post:
David Axelrod's Pattern of Sexual Misbehavior
by Ann Coulter11/09/2011
Herman Cain has spent his life living and working all over the country -- Indiana, Georgia, Minnesota, Nebraska, Kansas, Washington, D.C. -- but never in Chicago.---------------------------------------------------------------------------
So it's curious that all the sexual harassment allegations against Cain emanate from Chicago: home of the Daley machine and Obama consigliere David Axelrod.
Suspicions had already fallen on Sheila O'Grady, who is close with David Axelrod and went straight from being former Chicago mayor Richard M. Daley's chief of staff to president of the Illinois Restaurant Association (IRA), as being the person who dug up Herman Cain's personnel records from the National Restaurant Association (NRA).
The Daley-controlled IRA works hand-in-glove with the NRA. And strangely enough, Cain's short, three-year tenure at the NRA is evidently the only period in his decades-long career during which he's alleged to have been a sexual predator.
After O'Grady's name surfaced in connection with the miraculous appearance of Cain's personnel files from the NRA, she issued a Clintonesque denial of any involvement in producing them -- by vigorously denying that she knew Cain when he was at the NRA. (Duh.)
And now, after a week of conservative eye-rolling over unspecified, anonymous accusations against Cain, we've suddenly got very specific sexual assault allegations from an all-new accuser out of ... Chicago.
Herman Cain has never lived in Chicago. But you know who has? David Axelrod! And guess who lived in Axelrod's very building? Right again: Cain's latest accuser, Sharon Bialek.
Bialek's accusations were certainly specific. But they also demonstrated why anonymous accusations are worthless.
Within 24 hours of Bialek's press conference, friends and acquaintances of hers stepped forward to say that she's a "gold-digger," that she was constantly in financial trouble -- having filed for personal bankruptcy twice -- and, of course, that she had lived in Axelrod's apartment building at 505 North Lake Shore Drive, where, she admits, she knew the man The New York Times calls Obama's "hired muscle."
Throw in some federal tax evasion, and she's Obama's next Cabinet pick.
The reason all this is relevant is that both Axelrod and Daley have a history of smearing political opponents by digging up claims of sexual misconduct against them.
John Brooks, Chicago's former fire commissioner, filed a lawsuit against Daley six months ago claiming Daley threatened to smear him with sexual harassment accusations if Brooks didn't resign. He resigned -- and the sexual harassment allegations were later found to be completely false.
Meanwhile, as extensively detailed in my book Guilty: Liberal 'Victims' and Their Assault on America, the only reason Obama became a U.S. senator -- allowing him to run for president -- is that David Axelrod pulled sealed divorce records out of a hat, first, against Obama's Democratic primary opponent, and then against Obama's Republican opponent.
One month before the 2004 Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate, Obama was way down in the polls, about to lose to Blair Hull, a multimillionaire securities trader.
But then The Chicago Tribune -- where Axelrod used to work -- began publishing claims that Hull's second ex-wife, Brenda Sexton, had sought an order of protection against him during their 1998 divorce proceedings.
From then until Election Day, Hull was embroiled in fighting the allegation that he was a "wife beater." He and his ex-wife eventually agreed to release their sealed divorce records. His first ex-wife, daughters and nanny defended him at a press conference, swearing he was never violent. During a Democratic debate, Hull was forced to explain that his wife kicked him and he had merely kicked her back.
Hull's substantial lead just a month before the primary collapsed with the nonstop media attention to his divorce records. Obama sailed to the front of the pack and won the primary. Hull finished third with 10 percent of the vote.
Luckily for Axelrod, Obama's opponent in the general election had also been divorced.
The Republican nominee was Jack Ryan, a graduate of Dartmouth and Harvard law and business schools, who had left his lucrative partnership at Goldman Sachs to teach at an inner-city school on the South Side of Chicago.
But in a child custody dispute some years earlier, Ryan's ex-wife, Hollywood sex kitten Jeri Lynn Ryan, had alleged that, while the couple was married, Jack had taken her to swingers clubs in Paris and New York.
Jack Ryan adamantly denied the allegations. In the interest of protecting their son, he also requested that the records be put permanently under seal.
Axelrod's courthouse moles obtained the "sealed" records and, in no time, they were in the hands of every political operative in Chicago. Knowing perfectly well what was in the records, Chicago Tribune attorneys flew to California and requested that the court officially "unseal" them -- over the objections of both Jack and Jeri Ryan.
Your honor, who knows what could be in these records!
A California judge ordered them unsealed, which allowed newspapers to publish the salacious allegations, and four days later, Ryan dropped out of the race under pressure from idiot Republicans (who should be tracked down and shot).
With a last-minute replacement of Alan Keyes as Obama's Republican opponent, Obama was able to set an all-time record in an Illinois Senate election, winning with a 43 percent margin.
And that's how Obama became a senator four years after losing a congressional race to Bobby Rush. (In a disastrous turn of events, Rush was not divorced.)
Axelrod destroyed the only two men who stood between Obama and the Senate with illicitly obtained, lurid allegations from their pasts.
In 2007, long after Obama was safely ensconced in the U.S. Senate, The New York Times reported: "The Tribune reporter who wrote the original piece (on Hull's sealed divorce records) later acknowledged in print that the Obama camp had 'worked aggressively behind the scenes' to push the story."
Some had suggested, the Times article continued, that Axelrod had "an even more significant role -- that he leaked the initial story."
This time, Obama's little helpers have not only thrown a bomb into the Republican primary, but are hoping to destroy the man who deprives the Democrats of their only argument in 2012: If you oppose Obama, you must be a racist.
Ann Coulter is Legal Affairs Correspondent for HUMAN EVENTS and author of High Crimes and Misdemeanors, Slander, Treason, How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must), Godless, If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans, Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and their Assault on America, and the forthcoming Demonic: How The Liberal Mob Is Endangering America.
You can also follow Ann Coulter and Human Events on FACEBOOK.
*******
These women must have been paid A LOT OF MONEY to agree to do such an awful thing to Herman Cain. I wonder if the joint news conference will actually occur with all of the so-called "victims" in these false allegations? The women who wanted to remain anonymous might be having second thoughts now that they are being shown the sleezy connections between Bialek, that other woman who works in the Obama Administration, and Axelrod.
Question: Now that we see these obvious connections, could all of this simply be a coincidence? I don't think so!
Hat tip: Human Events
*******
Immediate Update! Right after posting this I found this post over at Nice Deb:
Video: Lie Detecting Speech Software Shows Cain To Be “Totally Truthful” – His Accuser – Not So Much
Maybe I’m naive, but one of the reasons I’ve wavered back and forth on whether Herman Cain is guilty or not of these sexual harassment allegations, is because it’s so hard for me to imagine that someone wo...
Posts
9 comments:
Gosh, Obama only made it by having his opposition "disqualified" and by virtue of Affirmative Action (eliminate all the qualified whites) and we're seeing the same thing with the only real threat to his socialist agenda (mainly, being able to get re-elected with the worse record of an US President ever). The Dems and their evil leader, BO, desperately need Mittens to be the nominee as the man is not only a leftist RINO, but since he has no cause or foundation to stand on as he stands for nothing but saying what it takes to get elected (heck, BO has him beat there, he's for Marxist and Islamic socialist rule), the base won't be galvanize to vote for him and they may be right. As bad BO is, I don't see conservatives putting a BO lite in office and the brain dead idiot (who are proving to me stupid people shouldn't be allowed to vote as the WSO's are proving) the only real threat is the only one that can trump the only card he has left: the race card. Oh, they have their back up plan: whites will vote for him to prove they're not racist when they really are all the while trying to prove to non-whites he's an Oreo (how is THAT not racist?). Explains how he got into the white house in the first place, doesn't it.
Note to GM - you must make separate comments in the "publish" vs. "don't publish" category. I cannot edit any comments, e.g. separate certain sentences or paragraphs within the same comment.
Very well:
As usual, madmath1 has his head in the wrong place.
To vote for Obama simply because he's black is just as racist as voting for Romney because he isn't.
Besides, it seems to me that the religion card is waiting to be played by some on the right: he's not “Judeo” although I'm sure he thinks he is, and he sure isn't “Christian” enough to satisfy the Christian Nationalists.
Forty-five percent of the GOP thinks Romney will get the nomination, and the performance of the candidates last night will only reinforce that impression. The 'true conservative Christian' our hostess seeks is probably more interested in living his live and not directing 300 million other lives. After all, one pillar of conservative thinking is less government interference, isn't that so?
GMpilot -
Madmath1 was right on with his comment about Obama disqualifying others (mostly through dirty political manuevers) to get where he is today. Facts don't lie. If you are blind to the facts laid out in the article then that's your problem.
I think that all the Obama-bots really fear Herman Cain becoming the Republican nominee because they can't use their "race card" lies against him.
If Romney does end up being the nominee, I would have to hold my nose and vote for him. He's better than Obama! I was unenthusiastic about McCain in 2008, but when he chose Gov. Palin for VP, I, along with millions of Christians were thrilled and voted for McCain just because of her!
Gingrich is moving up in the polls because of his brilliance in the debates. He's not my favorite, only because of some of his past problems and the fact that many young people may not want to vote for him. But he would be light years better than Romney.
I think that if Herman Cain became the nominee and then president, he would choose the best people to help guide him in all aspects of government. His successful business history might just be exactly what we need in the presidency at this time.
Then you'd better get a clothespin to hold your nose.
I'll go out on a limb here: Cain will not get the nomination. He may have been ideal for running a corporation, or even a national association. But that doesn't always translate. Has anyone asked him about foreign affairs? That is traditionally a strong point the 'Pubs have. Cain didn't know that China is a nuclear power, and has been since 1964! I hadn't even entered high school then, and I knew that, and I'm neither businessman nor politician.
Your so-called Obama-bots do not fear Cain because of his ethnicity. They certainly don't fear his policies, because apart from his “9-9-9” plan, he doesn't seem to have any.
Yes, of course he would choose whom he believes are the best people to help guide him in all aspects of government. All candidates do that. Following their advice is another story. Did he do that at the NRA? We don't know.
”His successful business history might just be exactly what we need in the presidency at this time.”
You missed one of the most important points that people enamored of the myth of the business executive ignore. That is that business men give orders, and people (who want to remain employed) jump to obey. Government is very different. People in the senior executive service don't care which political hacks are in office. They've seen them come and go. They run the agencies no matter who the political "head" of the agency might be. If they respect and like that man or woman, they'll make them look good. If they don't...well, “Brownie” is gone, but I'll bet most of his FEMA staff still have their jobs.
Even army generals realize this, and the smart ones know that it's the senior NCOs who see that their orders are carried out. Again, the Sergeant-Major will always be the Sergeant-Major, no matter who the Commander-in-Chief may be.
I agree, Gingrich is a brilliant debater. In that, he's superior to the other contenders. But it's not just his past problems that haunt him; it's that he never seems to learn from them. Whenever he gets into a staring contest with an opponent, he always blinks first. He has a history of high ideas that he has never followed through: the infamous Contract With America was just one of them, which he then broke with the government shutdown of '95. Not to mention his resignation from the House in 1997 on numerous ethics charges. He's more 'statesman' material than the rest of them, but Presidential? No way.
BTW, I replied to your comment on this post, but I doubt that you will like what is written there.
Been there, answered that.
Congratulations on your timeliness.
This is interesting:
WND: 'I've never seen anything like what they're doing to Cain'
It is a compilation of (mostly) conservative radio talk show hosts and what they said about the obvious false charges being hurled at Herman Cain.
Even that liberal queen Arianna Huffington recognized the scam going on against Cain:
Quote:
"Has Arianna Huffington partly wandered off of the 'progressive' reservation?"
That's what Brian Maloney of Radio Equalizer is wondering, after Huffington bashed her media colleagues for obsessively covering the Herman Cain "scandal." She compared the coverage to that devoted to the "Balloon Boy" hoax that swept the nation last year (FREE audio).
Read more: 'I've never seen anything like what they're doing to Cain' http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=366805#ixzz1dSeQIBza
'I've never seen anything like what they're doing to Cain'
Except perhaps what Cain is doing to himself.
What a difference a week makes.
It appears that the real Herman Cain 'scandal' is that he's running at all. We don't even have to consider Sharon Bialek and the other women any more; all that's needed is to bring up some other names, such as China or Libya.
Oh yeah, Libya. He couldn't answer a simple yes/no question on whether he agreed with Obama's policy, but in trying to explain his position, said he would have done the very things Obama in fact did do.
Yesterday he seemed to think that the Taliban has eased into the current Libyan government. How'd he know that? He hasn't sat in on any intelligence briefings at the Oval Office or Pentagon, so they didn't tell him that. It hasn't been mentioned in any of the media (not even WND!), and anyway everyone knows that the mass media is not to be trusted...so they didn't tell him that. Fact is, the Taliban only have interests in Afghanistan and Pakistan; apart from Islam, they have very little in common with the Libyan people and are not likely to put themselves out 3000 miles from home for people who might not welcome them. They would be seen as 'foreigners' just like anyone else.
That Cain is still neck-and-neck with Romney at this stage speaks less about his potential as POTUS and more about the GOP's desperate search to find someone other than Romney to endorse. In fact...
”...no, that's another one.”
Post a Comment