Thursday, February 14, 2013

Sarah Palin: #SOTUGottaBKiddingMe

Sarah Palin absolutely socks it to Ovomit's SOTU speech on her Face Book page!  No matter how the media tries to portray her in a negative way, she just ignores their cheap shots and shows how stupid the media of mass deception and corruption really is in their "thrill up the leg" Ovomit blathering!  Sarah always comes out swinging WITH THE TRUTH against the corrupt, evil,  and terribly failed policies of BHO's BADministration! 

God bless you, Sarah!!

~  Christine

Here is a copy of Sarah Palin's essay:


by Sarah Palin on Wednesday, February 13, 2013 at 9:02am ·

If you missed President Obama’s State of the Union address last night, you didn’t miss much – especially if you watched any of his past four State of the Union addresses.

We heard the same recycled rhetoric, and we heard his Orwellian declaration that the cornucopia of new federal programs he proposed, as well as his intention to eradicate world poverty, wouldn’t “increase our deficit by a single dime.”

Of course, he glossed over the inconvenient facts. He boasted about job creation, but didn’t mention that real unemployment is higher today than when he took office. He touted all those still undiscovered “clean energy” jobs without mentioning the tens of thousands of real jobs the Keystone Pipeline will create if he would simply allow it to be built. He sang of new energy development, but didn’t mention that new offshore leases for oil and natural gas drilling have declined a decimating 61% under his administration.

He talked about “helping” to build “a thriving middle class,” but didn’t address how the middle class is actually faring under his economic stewardship. This is important – his deception must be addressed: under his leadership, middle class families have seen the average price per gallon of gas increase 96%, the average cost of family health care premiums rise 24%, the annual cost per household from federal regulations rise to over $15,000, and real median household income decline $4,520. If this is what happens when he “helps” the middle class, then please, Mr. President, we implore you to stop “helping” us.

He talked about a “balanced approach to deficit reduction” without mentioning that $5.9 trillion has already been added to the debt since he took office. We’re $16.5 trillion in debt and he keeps digging the hole deeper! He didn’t mention his record trillion dollar deficits or the fact that his last proposed budget would add $9.2 trillion to the debt through 2022. His Democrat-controlled Senate hasn’t passed a budget in four years. That’s obviously not “responsible” or “balanced.” He said, “We can’t cut our way to prosperity.” Well, we definitely can’t get there by borrowing and spending money we don’t have on his “investments” that don’t work. If indiscriminately borrowing and spending money led to prosperity, then bankruptcy would be a sign of economic strength. But it isn’t.

A State of the Union address should give us a true picture of the direction in which we are headed. But we didn’t get the truth last night. And it WAS Orwellian.

What is the true state of our union? Though this may sound harsh, I’ll speak the truth here. We are a country going bankrupt to fund a bloated, distant, and often corrupt federal government led by venal politicians more concerned with paying off their campaign cronies and consolidating their own power than in preserving the constitutional republic that so many have fought and died for (including our brave men and women in uniform who were barely mentioned last night).

We are a country with an economy being stifled under the weight of a bankrupt and voracious federal machine demanding more taxes and burdensome regulations. Job creators are the ones stuck with the bill when Obama calls for “new revenue.” Their businesses bear the brunt of the nearly 87 million paperwork hours imposed by federal regulations in 2012 – annually costing them $1.75 trillion. And I haven’t even mentioned Obamacare yet, which looms like the dark cloud it is over our private sector. Is it any wonder why our economy is stagnant or why job growth is so anemic? President Obama’s “solution” to these problems is to make the federal government more intrusive, bankrupt, and controlling.

If we continue down the path Barack Obama has us on, the long-term forecast of the state of our union is not a pretty picture. Yet he merrily rolls along it, deceiving too many Americans into thinking that these are intelligent, economic, and ethical proposals.

Our President wasn’t candid with Americans about our forecast, but, interestingly, in a Q&A session last week, Paul Krugman, one of President Obama’s economic cheerleaders at the New York Times, was remarkably candid about where we’re headed.

When asked about our federal debt, he admitted that “eventually we do have a problem” especially because “the population is getting older” and “health care costs are rising.” So, what does he see as the solution to pay for all this? He admits that your taxes will rise. And worse:

“Surely in the end it will require some middle class taxes as well. We won’t be able to pay for the kind of government the society will want without some increase in taxes, not a huge one, but some increase in taxes on the middle class, maybe a value added tax. And we’re also going to have to make decisions about health care – not pay for health care that has no demonstrated medical benefits. So, the snarky version I use, which I shouldn’t even say because it gets me in trouble, is death panels and sales taxes is how we do this.” (But wait, I thought there’d be no such thing as “death panels,” liberal liars?)

Mr. Krugman tried to portray this brave new world in the gentlest possible light, but it’s going to take quite a lot of “sales taxes” to meet the payments on the ever-increasing multi-trillion dollar debt we’re burying our kids and grandkids under. And with health care costs rising under Obamacare, obviously a lot of care will be rationed and even flat out denied by panels of faceless bureaucrats making life and death decisions for you and your loved ones. This is the long-term forecast for the state of America under Obama’s failed policies: middle class taxes and death panels.

Does that sound good to you? It doesn’t to me. So, we better get motivated to do something about it. We’d better get out of our post-election funk and wake up to the radicals’ reality being created as America gets “fundamentally transformed.”

Here’s the good news: President Obama is in many ways a lame duck president. None of his ridiculous ideas will come to pass via the legislative process. Of course, he may try to force them down America’s throat by imposing them through other means. But they can be undone if the right people are in position to undo them. He is very bold right now – some would say cocky – because of his November win, but there is another election around the corner, and we can check his boldness at the ballot box by electing constitutional conservatives. We must continue to affirm the fact that growing our bankrupt federal government is NOT the solution. Most of what the federal government does could be handled better on the individual, local, and state levels.

Our country didn’t weather a Revolution, two World Wars, a Civil War, a Great Depression, and countless other political and economic storms, just to be sunk by the dangerous policies of this current administration. We’re stronger than this. As President Reagan said, “I do not believe in a fate that will fall on us no matter what we do. I do believe in a fate that will fall on us if we do nothing.”

So, do something. 2014 is just around the corner. Get motivated! Get organized. America, don’t retreat. In the words of yet another White House program, “Let’s move.”

- Sarah Palin


zoe said...

Sarah Palin is Ronald Reagan gold standard with a servant's heart. I hope the door will open for her in 2016. We should continue to pray for her and for her family.

Thanks for posting her sotu response. She is miles ahead of the rest of the crowd. God bless Gov. Palin.

steve said...

Hey Christine!
I can tell you the problem we have and it's a major one. Yes, all the presidential executives orders can be undone easily by the next president. Problem:
Hillary Clinton will most likely be our next president. She will finalize what Barack leaves undone.

Christinewjc said...

Hi Zoe,

Well said! Sarah certainly has a servant's heart as well as a solid spine of energy and fortitude to continue sharing her conservative Christian ideals. No matter how much the left tries to mock her or disparage her, they come off looking like sexist fools.

Even if Sarah does not run for president (right now, I doubt that she will), I know that she will be busy helping to get conservative republicans elected to the House and Senate. It would be so great to get Harry ReiDUNCE out of power in the Senate! Better yet, a Republican majority in the Senate would make Obama a lame duck the last two years of his pResidency at the White House.

I am with you on praying for her and her family. God is smiling down upon them all!

God bless,

Christinewjc said...

Hi Steve,

You might be right about Hillary Clinton running for president in 2016. However, I think that if Rubio runs and wins the Republican nomination, he would have a huge amount of Hispanic votes behind him that just might tip the scales in his favor in many states...especially in the all important swing states.

I could be wrong about this, but I don't think that America is ready for a female president...yet.

Female leaders have been elected in many countries, but when it comes to the U.S. presidential additional title of "leader of the free world," I think that too many people would balk at voting in a female leader...even if she is considered "liberal" or "progressive."

I know it's just Hollywood spin, but it was interesting to note that in the movie Lincoln, there was a scene where the political elite hollered a great big NO!! when someone even suggested that in the future, there would be a female president. They were more accepting of "the first black president" being elected rather than a woman! It must have a lot to do with the Commander-in-Chief position over the military. I think that a lot of men would think twice about pulling the lever for a female candidate for U.S. president. Of course, this is all speculation on my part and just my opinion. But I think that most men (and conservative women, of course) would not vote for Hillary. They don't mind her being 4 steps from the presidency (as she was when she was Secretary of State), but president or even VP might unnerve many.

Recall how apoplectic the leftists were when thinking about Sarah Palin being one step from the presidency if John McCain had won in 2008! Palin was not only disparaged because of her conservative ideals and principles; but I think that she was disliked by many men who could not accept any female (no less a conservative!!) as VP or president.