Monday, October 11, 2010

Obama Ineligibility Case Headed to Supreme Court

Despite the fact that many in the media continue to mock "The Birthers," there are dozens of good reasons for the public to support the petitioners in the Kerchner et al vs. Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al case. We need to be steadfast in our resolve to question why his documents are being kept hidden. We need to spread the word as these petitioners continue their fight to expose the fact that if Obama's biological father was Barack Obama Sr., then there is no way that Obama Jr. could be a natural born citizen of the United States of America.

New Ad - Kerchner v Obama Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed with the U.S. Supreme Court - Washington Times National Weekly edition - pg 5


Obama was born a British Subject and is still such to this day. Obama is NOT a "natural born Citizen" to constitutional standards. Obama has never conclusively proved he was born in Hawaii. Obama's paternal family in Kenya, Kenyan government officials, and newspapers in Kenya say he was born in Kenya. Obama's maternal grandmother likely falsely and illegally registered him as born in Hawaii to get him, her new foreign-born grandson, U.S. Citizenship.

Link to read and download newest ad:

History shows us that a popularly elected, but ineligible, chief executive in the executive branch of a government can be legally and constitutionally removed from office, e.g., Governor Thomas H. Moodie of North Dakota was a prime example. After he was sworn in and serving as Governor, the North Dakota State Supreme Court ordered Governor Moodie removed from office, after it was determined that he was constitutionally and legally ineligible to serve in the office to which he was popularly elected.

In case you are STILL a victim of the liberal left media of mass deception, which has covered this issue in a one-sided way, then I suggest that you read the links in the excerpt above to familiarize yourself with what the lamestream media refuses to reveal regarding this issue.

I am trying to remember where I read or heard this, but there was one judge in one case (there are several Obama ineligibility cases still active) who stated that [paraphrased] 'to reveal this information would be an embarrassment for the pResident.'

What???? Is that a "lawful" statement or an emotional, political ideological, and social opinion?

The term "embarrassment" is very interesting. There could be all sorts of reasons to use that term. However, I do not recall any judges stating that certain revelations about past presidents deserve to be hidden because of "embarrassment." Do you?

I applaud the courage of these plaintiffs to pursue this case all the way to the Supreme Court! That is why I continue to post and spread the word about this extremely important issue!

Hat Tip:

A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers


Also see this YouTube video:

Proof Obama Admits He Was Born In Kenya


Several brief videos where Obama - from his own mouth and in his own words - admits he was born in Kenya!


Obama ADMITS Born in Kenya!!!


The following video link may appear to not be connected to Obama's ineligibility issue. However, within the first six minutes, I can point out a deception that is being raised by the creator and narrator of the video.

Of course, I do not agree with everything in the following video, I present it here for people to go over to YouTube and view - even if you just view the first six minutes or so which is where I make my point, anyway. It has been viewed over 7,525,349 times!!!

In all honesty, it is difficult for me to get past the first few minutes when the narrator makes false accusations against President Bush.

The Obama Deception HQ Full length version [Note: The video is 1:53:40 long!]

What is truth and what are lies within this video? Well, I can share one lie. It is the opinion of the narrator and creator of the film that Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

From "The Next World War: What Prophecy Reveals About Extreme Islam and the West," by Grant R. Jeffrey -

What Happened to Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction?

VX nerve gas, a WMD, is a binary gas that can be prepared only with complex chemical warfare technology, equipment, and experienced scientists. It is known from Iraqi admissions and the U.N. Special Commission (UNSCOM) inspectors that Iraq possessed more than five hundred tons of the precursor chemicals required to produce VX-nerve gas weapons. Iraq claimed to have destroyed these materials but never provided proof.

Israeli intelligence analysts and key players in the U.S. intelligence community, including retired U.S. Air Force Gen. James Clapper, declared that huge amounts of Iraqi WMD were transferred to Syria just before the United States invaded Iraq in March 2003. U.S. weapons inspector David Kay told Congress in testimony in 2003 that U.S. satellite surveillance revealed substantial vehicular traffic in convoys from Iraq to Syria in February and March 2003. Clapper said that the intelligence community determined the convoys contained missiles and WMD components that were banned by the U.J. Security Council.5

The former deputy undersecretary of defense, John A. Shaw, revealed what actually happened to Iraq's missing weapons of mass destruction. "The short answer to the question of where the WMDs Saddam bought from the Russians went was that they went to Syria and Lebanon... They were moved by Russian Spetsnaz units out of uniform, that were specifically sent to Iraq to move the weaponry and eradicate any evidence." 6

During the breakup of the Soviet Union in 1989 and 1990, Russia repeatedly used this type of "emergency exit" planned removal of WMD and other sophisticated military equipment from former Warsaw Pact allies in Eastern Europe, as well as from former Soviet republics such as the Ukraine and Kazakstan. A variety of respected sources, including Shaw and Saddam Hussein's former top general, Georges Sada, have confirmed that Russian Spetsnaz troops coordinated the removal of Iraq's WMD to Syria by large truck convoys and aircraft in the period just before the invasion of Iraq in April 2003. 7

The question that will occur to most readers is why the Bush Administration endured countless attacks on the credibility of its prewar claims about Iraq's WMD and never publicly revealed the significant evidence that points to the removal of these weapons to Syria. According to both Shaw and Sada, the Bush administration's desire to protect Russia from international embarrassment motivated it to suppress this intelligence in the hope that Russia would assist America in limited Iran's and North Korea's plans to achieve a nuclear warhead.

We now know how badly THAT hope didn't pan out! Russia is actively helping Iran (admittedly, I don't know about them helping North Korea) and with the Obama admin., through it's extremely weak foreign policy, is not actively doing anything to halt Iran from getting nuclear weapons! It appears that Israel will, once again, need to come to the rescue of the world and destroy Iran's nuclear facilities. The question is when...


5 "U.S. Intelligence Consensus: Iraqi WMD Shipped to Syria," World Tribune, October 30, 2003, Also posted at

6 Kenneth Timmerman, "Ex-Pentagon Official Says Russia Moved Saddam's WMDS," Newsmax, February 19, 2006,

7 For more on this, see Georges Sada, Saddam's Secrets (Nashville: Integrity Publishers, 2006).


Glenn Beck is right about the need to "question with boldness" and about "doing your own research." The over 7 million viewers of "The Obama Deception" have been fed some propaganda about President Bush and the WMDs that were in Iraq, after all!

Now, I'm not claiming that there isn't any true information in that Infowars video, but I am pointing out that sometimes, a person's ideology can blind them to the truth in some situations and cases.

This is why I like to study the Bible and prophecy. I know that I can count on the TRUTH contained within its pages!

1 comment:

stevex09 said...

So right you are Christine! The words of eternal life are contained in the Bible.