Thursday, December 03, 2009

Red Flags Up All Over this Obama "Deployment" [UPDATES]



I would love to hear a body language expert analyze the above photo. Perhaps we really don't need an expert - just our own gut instincts and observation - to express what is going on in the photo.

First, the cadet with the "Kill Bin Laden" book. Priceless! The cadet has his right index finger pointing towards those words on the book cover. His left hand holds the book so that everyone can see the title of the book. Does everyone recall how Obama, during his campaign run, railed on President Bush for not "getting" Bin Laden? Now, did we hear ANYTHING about Obama pledging to get Bin Laden during the last 11 months of his bogus POTUS torture being inflicted upon our own nation?

Answer: No!

Next, look at the face of the cadet near Obama's right arm in the photo. What kind of look is that? It appears to be a look of contempt. I get the feeling that his body language is also saying, "don't you dare come near me, Obama." He obviously doesn't like him.

It is hard to tell what the young man behind the cadet with the mad look on his face is expressing in his body language. He does have his eyes on Obama, but we can't tell if he is smiling or frowning.

It appears that the cadet (who is hidden by Obama's body) is giving a high-five type of handshake. At least Obama had one fan in the audience! LOL

There is a cadet (behind the book holder) who has his right hand touching his chin. I forget (from what I have previously learned via Tanya Reiman's analyses on the O'Reilly Factor show) what that kind of gesture means. He doesn't appear to be smiling. Neither does the cadet to the left of him (on the right top portion of the photo).

I got the photo from Lame Cherry's blog Go read the essay he wrote!

Excerpt:

There are red flags up all over this Obama "deployment" of United States Soldiers and Soldiers of other nations into his Afnamistan.

The first of which is Obama at West Point almost chanted "as your commander in chief" at the cadets. That reveals immense weakness in Obama if he has to be Manchurian candidating American Soldiers, like pleading, "I am your wife you must love me!"

The cadets as this blog noted were an unhappy lot. The intelligent ones were studying Obama and judging him. Most though had the look in their eyes of misted regrets in knowing Bowbama had decided their lives by dumping them into his Afnamistan.

The above cadet reading a book was the ultimate slap coupled with the bored cadet. Obama's captive audience had committed the Great Escape while he lectured at them from the podium.

The worst of this Obama deployment is as this blog exclusively noted, is this is giving every sign to be a stage act which is murdering US Soldiers just so Obama can "win the day" in the 2010 Pelosi elections and win the war in 2011 for his re election.

Murdering Soldiers for political dynasty is disgusting and criminal.

A further affirmation of this Obama politics of using a crisis war he created was observed in the Joint Chief appearing on Charlie Rose, and nowhere did this military leader speak of fighting a war. His entire change was "stability" to Afghanistan.
That is Freudian in every measure, because Mike Mullen knows very well there is nothing in Afghanistan which can not be squashed with minimum force. The JC is by psychological slip speaking the facts that there is nothing there for a over one hundred thousand troops to do, but die in terror attacks.

All that needs to be done as the JC noted was to bribe the Taliban and kill off some al Qaeda which the JC really screwed up on in giving Bush credit in noting they have been diminished.

Mr. Obama in his sadistic Chicago slick willy attacks on President Bush's leadership which was perfectly successful in the two wars, will not appreciate the JC slipping up and telling the world there is nothing to fight in Afghanistan as Bush wiped out al Qaeda in mass.

Mr. Obama though has more of a problem as Sec. of Defense Donald Rumsfeld today called Obama the liar he is in Obama lying to the cadets and the American people, that no troop requests were granted in Afghanistan.

Mr. Rumsfeld would know the war as he designed it to be fought on Caspar Weinberger deliberate terms with Dick Cheney, meaning, Donald Rumsfeld limited troops in harms way to reduce casualties as there was not a need to deploy mass troops in Afghanistan.

The commanders knew this and the world knew this, and yet Obama lied to the world at West Point and made it sound like the Bush Administration was not fighting nor maintaining Afghanistan.


Continue reading here

So, once again we catch Obama lying through his teeth for political purposes. But this time, he is putting thousands of soldiers in harms way without giving them a plan to WIN or, to even have any chance for VICTORY in Afghanistan! DISGUSTING - TO SAY THE LEAST!!!

At the following link, a Marine combat veteran explains how terrible Obama's speech and plan was and that the bogus POTUS didn't connect AT ALL with the cadets at West Point.

Radio America.org

Couple those reports with the fact that the ObamaBORG BOTS are now out in force - intentionally attacking blogs that report the truth about Obama's ineligibility issue!

Ask yourself these questions. Would they be attacking if there wasn't anything to hide? Sounds like they are running scared. I wonder when this usurper's scandal will blow wide open? With millions more people now aware of the real details and facts, it will be hard to hide the truth much longer.

Citizen Wells: Washington Times ad, White House attack, Charles Kerchner ad, December 3, 2009, Kerchner V Obama and Congress, Hacker attacks Post & Email

I have added the Post & Email blog to my daily reading list.

The Post & Email

[Update: Just checked at 7:22 and the blog is now back online.]

Here is a portion of the latest headline from that blog that can be seen in my sidebar:

The Post & Email
Fitzpatrick charges Obama before TN Grand Jury - SUCCESSFULLY GETS PRO-OBAMA FOREMAN REMOVED, ON FORGERY CHARGES by Sharon Rondeau (Dec. 2, 2009) — On Tuesday, December 1, 2009, Commander Walter Fitzpatri...


Obama and his evil cohorts don't want this information getting out there into the blogosphere!

But the blogs are not the only place where you can get the information. Go to the following link and watch the video:

Monroe County man seeks indictments on President Obama for treason

Next, read the blog posts about this issue that are not being reported by the Media of Mass Deception.

The JAG Hunter

RepubX

Also read the latest on the Obama ineligibility for POTUS issue:

WorldNetDaily: Appeals briefs scheduled in Obama eligibility challenge
'We look forward to moving ahead with this very important constitutional case'


A Place to Ask Questions To Get the Right Answers: Kerchner v Obama & Congress - 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals Briefing Notice Issued

WOW! Just found this article at The Post & Email link:

Obama in 1980 said he was born in Mombasa, Kenya
ADMISSION MADE TO MARINE, TESTIMONY PUBLISHED ON-LINE


Here is the original post:

Gathering of Eagles NY: Barack Obama Sighting, Hawaii 1980

Interesting conclusion:

In the light of what is called “The Birther” movement, these memories are still foremost in my mind concerning this. While I cannot swear it was Barak Obama, all the details I do remember of that chance encounter fit the profile of the man who some people claim is born in Kenya and others claim he was born in Hawaii . The man I met was about 18, thin, Mulatto, told me he was born in Mombassa, raised overseas, was living in Hawaii and hadn’t yet been to many places in the world outside of those places, mostly, hadn’t been to the mainland of America for any long time period if at all. And he openly told me he wanted to be President.

And I remember that face, the face of a young man who sat on a table to my right front, his hands resting on the edge of the table, him leaning forward, his smile, all teeth. It was Barak Obama. I don’t know if I’d bet my life on it, but I am willing to tell people openly at the risk of my ridicule. I was there, and saw him, spoke to him, and he openly told me he was born in Mombassa, Kenya, not Hawaii .

Does it matter? Of course it does. It should not have to be explained as to why it matters.






Hat Tips:

Lame Cherry

Radio America.org

Citizen Wells

Volunteer TV.com

WorldNetDaily

A Place to Ask Questions To Get the Right Answers [Note: For much detailed information on the current Obama ineligibility issue, read the links in the sidebar at this site.]

The Post & Email

Gathering of Eagles NY

*******
Update at 7:47 a.m.PT:

Read this article!!!

The Post & Email: Mega Media counter attack on Natural Born Citizen issue
AP, NYT AND POLITICS.CO.UK MISTATE LAW AND FACTS IN DEC. 1ST REPORTS


The attack by the UK paper was written by an intern! [See comments for more info about her].

*******
Update:

Also read this site:

American Grand Jury.org

Take a look at the presentments page:

American Grand Jury Presentments Page

[Be sure to see the following two exhibits at the page}:

EXHIBIT 6 - Evidence - DNC1

Fraudulent Nomination Document # 1 filed by the Democratic National Convention with 49 States' Election commissions.


EXHIBIT 6 - Evidence - DNC2

Fraudulent Nomination Document # 2 filed by the Democratic National Convention with State of Hawaii Election Commission.


Hawaii was the ONLY STATE where the CONSTITUTIONAL VERBIAGE WAS INCLUDED!!

WHY?????

That's what the American Grand Jury and the American people want to know!

THAT IS FRAUD....PEOPLE!! PLAIN AND SIMPLE AND ILLEGAL FRAUD!!

14 comments:

spud tooley said...

(a) not that facts count here, of course, but your photo is doctored. from the times online:

The picture was taken in the academy’s Eisenhower auditorium an hour and a half before Mr Obama took the podium there for his address to the nation on Tuesday night. For security reasons, cadets were seated four hours before the speech and many brought reading and study material, an academy spokesman said.

silly blogstress.

(b) i saw on the news that today is the anniversary of the first proposed trillion dollar budget in american history. guess which president submitted it to congress?

(hint: his initials are ronald wilson reagan.)

my hunch is that if you take into account the inflationary money policy of the fed, obama's proposed budget is pretty comparable to Conservative Jesus...

(c) i've been in canada this week. had dinner with a guy from london england who decried all the arguments of those opposed to health care reform as 'rubbish' - good english word. he says the way british health care is painted is so far from the truth as to be laughable.

but then, facts are just facts, aren't they?

mike r.

Kevin said...

Is this a real picture? Why do those people behind Obama look so large? It looks fake to me. I could be wrong...

Kevin said...

Hi Christine,
As I suspected, that picture is a total fake! http://chicagoray.blogspot.com/2009/12/cadet-reading-kill-bin-laden-during.html

He was reading this book before Obama gave his speech. So I guess all the speculating about what these cadets were thinking is just speculation based on a photoshop picture.

Gary Baker said...

Hi Mike,

"my hunch is that if you take into account the inflationary money policy of the fed, obama's proposed budget is pretty comparable to Conservative Jesus..."

Your hunch shows that you continue in ignorance of economics and tax policy. And since it's obvious you won't do the work required to educate yourself...

Regan was recommending large spending at a time coming off of the Carter inflationary period. I'm sure you remember it. I got a car loan then at around 20%. Inflation was in double digits. The budget submitted had to assume that the long term cost of goods ordered was going to double by the time spending was done on the furthest items. Add to that, as large as it was, the monetary supply was expanding and already large. Not ideal conditions by a long shot, but it did make Regan's budget a lower percentage of GNP by far. Also, as Regan's policies kicked in, growth picked up and tax revenue increased.

So far, the only real growth that Obama has caused is in government. This means that for all the jobs he claims, it still means that we have a net loss in revenue because it takes about five private sector employees to pay for each government employee.

Gary Baker said...

Hi Mike,

"my hunch is that if you take into account the inflationary money policy of the fed, obama's proposed budget is pretty comparable to Conservative Jesus..."

Your hunch shows that you continue in ignorance of economics and tax policy. And since it's obvious you won't do the work required to educate yourself...

Regan was recommending large spending at a time coming off of the Carter inflationary period. I'm sure you remember it. I got a car loan then at around 20%. Inflation was in double digits. The budget submitted had to assume that the long term cost of goods ordered was going to double by the time spending was done on the furthest items. Add to that, as large as it was, the monetary supply was expanding and already large. Not ideal conditions by a long shot, but it did make Regan's budget a lower percentage of GNP by far. Also, as Regan's policies kicked in, growth picked up and tax revenue increased.

So far, the only real growth that Obama has caused is in government. This means that for all the jobs he claims, it still means that we have a net loss in revenue because it takes about five private sector employees to pay for each government employee.

Gary Baker said...

Additionally, at present inflation is zero to possibly negative. This means that all of the huge spending is being figured with a future cost close to it's present cost. But we both know (or you should know) that isn't going to hold. The way that the Fed is printing money and Obama is borrowing, we are going to start having inflation pretty soon. Add to that the totally predictable (but ignored by liberals) result of Obama's policies that tax revenues are continuing to decline and unemployment is increasing. His solution: Expand government spending through entitlements beyond all recognition. Extend unemployment benefits while promising increased taxes, regulations, and costs for hiring workers and creating jobs. If you can't see the problem with this picture, then it becomes painfully obvious why you might be looking for more government regulation, because it's likely that you are having a great deal of trouble keeping your own finances in order.

And I'm sure the senior citizen in England who was left for days to die in her own waste is gratified to hear how some people love her government health care, and the extra 20% who die of cancer while waiting for treatment are glad to offer their lives. If it's your desire to give up responsibility for yourself and let others make your life and health decisions, you have my blessing, but it sounds pretty silly for a person with that attitude to try and advise the rest of us on what we should be voting for.

But then, facts are just facts, aren't they.

Gary Baker said...

Kevin,

For once I have to agree with you. I haven't seen such a bad photoshop job since the AP morphed Palin's head on the bikini girl with the gun. Cadets have more respect for even a washout leader than to show that kind of attitude.

Christinewjc said...

Yeah...Lame Cherry has a habit of photoshopping pictures at his blog. The new one over there is much more obvious!

But don't you guys have anything to say about what was written in my blog post? Have each of you nothing to say about all the links to additional blog posts about Obama's ineligibility dilemma? I would especially like to hear what you think of the discovery of the DNC documents that had been altered for 49 states:

American Grand Jury Presentments Page

Quote: EXHIBIT 6 - Evidence - DNC Details

Barack Obama refused throughout the vetting process to produce proof that he was a "natural born" citizen as required by the Constitution. On Obama's word alone, Nancy Pelosi caused documents to be signed and distributed to forty nine of the fifty States hiding the fact Obama was not eligible for nomination or election. Many others, including State DNC organizations, allowed the truth about Obama's eligibility to be hidden from the electorate and the public. The charge of fraud is now clearly a conspiracy of fraud against the electorate, public and the United States of America.

TWO nomination documents were prepared. The second document [DNC2] included the "Constitutional" certification within the declaration:

THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 through 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution..

Nancy Pelosi, the DNC and local State DNC Chapters filed the "non-Constitutional" certification document with the Election Commissions in forty-nine of the fifty States.

The two separate Nomination Certifications are complete with date stamps, matching signatures, even the same Notary of Public authentication.

As a result of the "Constitutional" Nomination Certification not being filed with forty-nine States the Election Commissions within these States were defrauded as the truth about Obama's vetting and eligibility was purposely withheld, therefore misrepresented.

The 50th State, Hawaii, is a mystery as to why the DNC submitted the Constitutional Certification. It is assumed the State of Hawaii demanded the wording be included in the Certification. However, by filing this Constitutional "version" with Hawaii and not the other 49 States it ADDS to the fraud, conspiracy and guilt. Why would the DNC even prepare (2) documents? The issue still remains, Obama is not a "natural born" citizen and the vetting of him by the DNC was misrepresented and fraudulent.

Not only is this fraud, it is a conspiracy because multiple parties were involved.


Doesn't this bother either of you, Mike and Kevin?

spud tooley said...

gary, just one comment to draw attention to the fact that your continued slaps at me about my lack of knowledge are quite simply directed at yourself: the proposal by reagan was in 1986/1987. surely, even for you, six-to-seven YEARS after carter's presidency would have been long enough to stop blaming things on him??? or perhaps more accurately reagan was simply still cleaning up the mess from HIS first presidency?

you know, you and your republican friends won't even allow that iraq, afghanistan, and the complete destruction of the world economy can be laid at bush's feet even 6-8-10 MONTHS after w's presidency' - yet you want to argue that what reagan did years and years and years after carter were carter's fault?!?! too funny. too telling.

too much a waste of my time.

btw: look up 'inflation' in your OWN economics book.

i'm not even going to open the emails i got on your third... and fourth... and fifth... comments you made. as usual, me thinkest the lady doth protest too much.

mike r.

spud tooley said...

Doesn't this bother either of you, Mike and Kevin?

christine, i continue to read 'talkwisdom'.

my tolerance for pain is obviously pretty high...

:)

(hope you're doing well...)

i must say kevin's is a welcome voice to hear. even went over and read some of his stuff.

luckily, the whole world hasn't turned into raving nationalists...

mike r.

Kevin said...

Hi Christine,
This doesn't bother me because I don't believe it. If it gets through the courts and looks legitimate, then that is another story. But then again, the courts have been wrong in the past. However, President Obama was born in the United States to a woman who was a United States Citizen. I don't see a need to believe anything otherwise. Besides, if all this were true, then I would think that it would have come out quite early in the career of Obama.
I'm a Democrat. Obama was elected by the majority of the citizens of the United States. He won fair and square. If Obama was not a citizen, then you can bet that Hillary Clinton and all the rest who were vying for that position would have made it very clear.

Thanks Mike!

Gary Baker said...

Hi Mike,

"the proposal by reagan was in 1986/1987. surely, even for you, six-to-seven YEARS after carter's presidency would have been long enough to stop blaming things on him???"

Again Mike you show your ignorance. What are some of the necessary components of the budget? Debt maintenance, or interest on the debt? Sound familiar? What is that interest based on? Short and long term treasury notes and bonds? Sound familiar? Ten year and thirty year treasury notes? So, any bonds and long term treasury notes sold during the Carter years at high interest (due to the high inflation) would still be affecting the budget six to seven years after, now wouldn't they? As usual your ignorance is exceeded only by your... hmmm...that's a tough one.

But be of good cheer! You still have more than the required intelligence to be a liberal climatologist!

Christinewjc said...

Mike - So...I'm a "raving nationalist" because I think that it is important to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America?

Kevin -

Please see my sidebar for the links found within the text of this copy. Here is the case:

THE RELEVANT OBAMA ADMISSION
At Barack Obama’s web site, the following admission:

“FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship

‘When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…’ “

Read that last line again.

“That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…”

That’s an admission that Great Britain “governed the status” of Barack Obama, Jr. He has chosen to highlight this on his own volition.

And this leads to the relevant question:

HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN’S STATUS BE “GOVERNED” BY GREAT BRITAIN?

A natural born citizen’s status should only be governed by the United States.

Hat Tip: Natural Born Citizen blog


It isn't a case of whether Obama is a citizen. It's a case of whether or not he is a natural born citizen (nbc) - which is required for the position of POTUS.

The only way that he could be a nbc, is if his father WASN'T Barack Obama Senior. If his biological father was either Malcolm X or Frank Marshall Davis (as the rumors state), then he would be a nbc.

A nbc is someone born of TWO CITIZEN PARENTS.

Hillary Clinton and "all the rest" as you had stated DON'T CARE about this issue as long as "their side and/or their guy" got into office.

One person who was "vying for the position" was Alan Keyes. He did file a lawsuit. Dozens of others were filed, too. They were summarily dismissed on a "lack of standing" clause.

I'm not sure of the details, but perhaps the executive order that Obama signed the day he was sworn in (where his records were all sealed) may be why none of the cases have been properly ajudicated. Could be other reasons, too.

So I ask you again - doesn't it bother you that Obama has paid out close to 2 million dollars to hide his vault-length COLB from the American people instead of paying the $20.00 it would have cost for him to get it and show it to the world?

What is he hiding? Don't you want to know?

Christinewjc said...

In case that brief summary isn't enough to convince you, read the following for the full explanation:

Obama, the Putative President of the U.S., was Born a British Subject