[Note: Scroll down when you go to the site and read the recap of day 2. Then, click on "older posts" to read the recap of day one. Or, just click here for day one and read them in order.]
There are short "twitter-like" comments about who has taken the stand as witnesses (as well as questions presented and answered; and the jury being sworn in, etc.) in between the recaps.
What do readers think about this trial? Will anything come of it?
The cover-ups going on (especially in the media of mass deception), shielding Obama from scrutiny is criminal! And, the fawning favor that the Lamestream media does to protect Obama from exposure and/or criticism is astounding! The only place where you will get the TRUTH is via conservative blogs!
More on this tomorrow...
The Conservative Monster.com
Also see these important stories:
ZachJonesIsHome: Google Suppresses Obama Social Security Number Story? – Rev. Manning Obama Trial Starts – Lt. Col. Lakin Gets Court Date – American Patriot Foundation – The BOPAC Report
Western Journalism: The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues.
But why would someone obtain so many Social Security numbers? According to investigators, those who create additional Social Society numbers are typically engaged in criminal activities such as Social Security fraud, tax fraud, real estate fraud, campaign contributions fraud, voter fraud and so on. While the private investigator who compiled this list says multiple social security numbers does not automatically prove there’s criminal activity involved, he states that “having said that, I have personally experienced many, many cases where such information has led to subsequent exposure of fraud, deception, money laundering and other crimes.“What is interesting to note is that Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, was a volunteer at the Oahu Circuit Court probate department and had access to the Social Security numbers of deceased people.Investigating Obama: Don Fredrick of Obama Timeline and Judd Bagley on Naked Short Selling - Manufactured Crisis on Wall Street
The following is ABSOLUTELY OFFENSIVE to the United States of America and the memories of all of those who died on 9/11/2001 during the RADICAL ISLAMIC MUSLIM TERRORIST ATTACK ON OUR NATION!!
Sultan Knish: The Ground Zero Mosque - First You Bomb and Then You Occupy
Atlas Shrugs: 911 Mega Mosque Creates Fury Across the World
'Sacred' ground': The World Trade Centre attacks claimed 3,000 lives. Plans to build a mosque at Ground Zero site have been described as a 'slap in the face'
The building, which was damaged by the fuselage of one of the hijacked planes, is just two blocks from Ground Zero.
Construction is due to begin on September 11 next year – the 10th anniversary of the terrorist attack.
Rosemary Cain, whose fireman son was killed, said: ‘I think it’s despicable. That’s sacred ground. It’s a slap in the face.
'How could anybody give them permission to build a mosque there?’
Bill Doyle, whose son was also among the 3,000 victims, said: ‘What I’m frightened about is that it’s almost going to be another protest zone – a meeting place for radicals.’
Paul Sipos, a member of the New York community board, said the £68million community project should be located somewhere else.
‘If the Japanese decided to open a cultural centre across from Pearl Harbour, that would be insensitive. If the Germans opened a Bach choral society across from
Auschwitz, even after all these years, that would be an insensitive setting,’ he told the New York Post.
‘I have absolutely nothing against Islam. I just think, why here?’
Since the attacks, Ground Zero has become a shrine to the victims, with millions of visitors paying their respects every year.
Pamela Geller, executive director of the Stop Islamisation of America activist group, is organising a rally next month in protest against the development, which will be called Cordoba House.
She said: ‘What could be more insulting and humiliating than a monster mosque in the shadow of the World Trade Centre buildings that were brought down by an Islamic jihad attack?
‘Any decent American, Muslim or otherwise, wouldn’t dream of such an insult.’
What's more, Morgan's comment is one that we should all sit up, take notice and realize:
I was married to a Syrian, Muslim. When I realized he was an extremist with anti-American, and anti-Jewish views, the marriage fell apart. He attempted to destroy me in an effort to take custody of our son. He made my life a living hell, and is still attempting to do so. Prior to marriage and divorce, I was naive to the Muslim culture and its hateful views and religion -- if that's what one would call it. (I think of it more as a cult.) I truly hope that we as a country will wake up and stop tip toeing around this huge monster. You can not reason with Islam. What will it take? The extremist are here. We welcome them into our country everyday. My former spouse has lived in this country for 20+ years and works for the US government. They live among us, work among us, and would gladly assist in our demise. I'm convinced our very liberty and freedom are at stake.
Posted by: Morgan Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:27 PM
Read through the post and comment thread over at Gateway Pundit to see how political the Miss U.S.A. pageant remains to be. Last year, the "political correctness" onslaught began with the rejection of Carrie Prejean's answer that marriage is the union of one man and one woman. This year, Miss Oklahoma supported the Arizona illegal immigrant law (although she adeptly added that she is against racial profiling which the law prohibits as well) through agreeing that STATES RIGHTS should determine such hotbed issues. Because of her answer, she got second place.
Does anyone recall the question that Miss Michigan got?
It does appear to be a setup. I wonder. Do the judges have several questions at their disposal and then pick one according to who draws their name?
Would that same judge have asked Miss Michigan a politically volatile question like what does she think about a Muslim Mosque being built at the 9/11/2001 World Trade Center terrorist attack area despite millions of AMERICAN people protesting such a structure being built because it is an insult to "celebrate" the religion of Islam that was the reason for the destruction in the first place?
I don't think so...