Talk Wisdom
Can Someone Give a Reasonable Answer? - The questions that I am referring to are asked at the end of this post. If I were to file this report, it would definitely qualify to go under the title of...
19 hours ago
OK. I will give it a shot.
What it comes down to is this: the White House plus all of their progressive cronies (including the unelected czars and the elected buffoons known as Congressmen and Senators) are all members of the culture of death.
Think about it.
The progressives love and celebrate death!
1. Abortion on demand.
2. Support for Islam - and NEVER criticizing their tenets which include jihad against the West and "death to Israel." "Honor" killings (now there is an evil oxymoron!) of wives and children.
3. Support and/or just plain appeasement of dictators and mad men around the world (i.e. Ahmadinejad, Kim Jong Il, Castro, Chavez); as well as the brutal beasts from history who have killed millions (e.g. Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot,) or "only just hundreds of thousands" (e.g. Saddam Hussein - whom most progressives would have wanted to remain as dictator in Iraq).
Anyone else see the pattern?
The one brutal killer that they do not openly cheer is Hitler. Why? Because they incorrectly claim that he was a "Christian" and "right wing" in ideology. Therefore, he is targeted by the left with scorn.
Another reason why Hitler must be hated by progressives (at least openly) might be because the progressives still want the liberal leftist Jewish voters to remain true to the Democrat party - especially when it comes to donations.
Holocaust deniers (at least those who deny it openly) are treated just like the 9/11 "truthers." You can't say that in public, but even if you really believe it, you can still make it to a "Green Jobs" Czar position (Van Jones) as long as a YouTube video doesn't surface or membership in the "truthers" crowd comes out. When that happens you must be placed in a more - shall we say - "Weathermen Underground" position; which is where Jones ended up. However, those in the know already realize that the juggling of Jones within the administration has been already exposed by Glenn Beck.
There have been conservative bloggers who have speculated that the progressives will have another manufactured crisis of some sort (like the economic crash that started in October, 2008 which ended up getting ObaMAO elected) up their tricky sleeves to turn people back towards Obama and his ilk. I seriously doubt that it would work, however. The majority of the American people who are paying attention to the overt destruction going on in our nation by the progressive tyrants will not get fooled again. I am reminded of the old saying, "Fool me once - shame on you. Fool me twice - shame on me."
So what is left?
Perhaps a manufactured crisis of some sort that will require dictator Obama to institute martial law? Hey - they are working hard on collapsing the economy, keeping the unemployed dependent on government hand-outs, crushing us with debt we can never pay back, taxing us up the ying-yang, destroying capitalism and demolishing small business owners. Not to mention the havoc bing inflicted via all of the sinful socialist agenda that they are pushing on America. Would they go so far as to cancel the election of 2010? We will have to wait and see. Nothing would surprise me anymore from these cruel and evil people.
That is what they are - CRUEL AND EVIL. Isn't every dictator? Shame on all of the minions who still, despite all of the evidence being shown against the pawn-in-chief and his puppeteers, follow such cruelty and evil.
*******
More of the progressive Democrat side show:
Racist Bill Maher: Obama Would Be Better President If He Were “Fully Black” (Video)
posted by Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit - 28 minutes ago
Once again... Only a foul-mouthed lib could get away with such a blatantly racist statement and still hold down a career in the democratic-media complex. In a segment on Friday, Bill Maher explained to his...
Now... this one made me laugh out loud! How ridiculous is this???
*******
And the laughs just keep on comin'!
Big Journalism
Open Thread: Is the Dems’ New Logo Right on Target? - Over to you: You really can’t make this stuff up.
1 hour ago
Comment there: JP_in_CO 74p · 1 hour ago
It looks like more like
the grade they are giving themselves then it does a logo.
Ha ha ha haaaaa!
*******
So....which is more dumb, stupid and harmful? The girl who threw acid into her own face or this?
JammieWearingFool
Government Efficiency: $111M in Stimulus Saved Just 55 Jobs - You know what this means, right? We need another stimulus! Of course if you complain about this outrageous waste of taxpayer money then you're reacist or som...
2 hours ago
According to Bill "the nincompoop" Maher - it would be more raaaaaacist if Obama was "all black."
*******
Nice Deb covers a lot of ground on Islam in this post!
Nice Deb
Friday News Round-up - There’s a lot of disturbing news to report on the topic of Islamic supremacism at the moment, and a good place to start with that is at Weasel Zippers: WH...
19 hours ago
Typical young, clueless, ideologically-dirtied and brain -dead progressive: 'So what's the big deal about that mosque thingy in N.Y.?'
*******
Citizen Wells
November 2, 2010, Buh bye congress, Vote jackasses out, Video, Citizen Wells open thread, September 18, 2010 - November 2, 2010, Buh bye congress, Vote jackasses out We can do it. We must do it. From Citizen Wells March 23, 2010. “We the people are the rightful mast...
3 hours ago
No wonder the Dems wanted to change their logo! The "donkey" symbol was too descriptive of their actions! However, the "D" icon represents them very well, too. "D" for DISASTER!
*******
Good summary of why many Tea Party Patriots are ousting "establishment" RINOS and winning in the Republican primaries:
Paratus Familia
It happened on your watch - I have been watching with interest the recent victories of "tea party candidates" in numerous primary races across the country. The grass roots Patriot...
2 days ago
*******
Posts
4 comments:
Hi Christine,
Interestingly enough, many of the leftist individuals of his day did indeed support and applaud Hitler. He was pushing socialism, and the leftists thought that was just wonderful. Many liberal Jews applauded Hitler as well until he got around to making the Jews the official villains of the world. That pushed a lot of people away from Nazism. Undeterred, they starting writing about the wonders of Stalin's worker's paradise even as he systematically murdered all who opposed him and killed millions.
The attitude was revealed recently as the Dems eulogized Robert Byrd, Democrat and former KKK member. They said he was a good man who simply did what he needed to do to get elected so that he could promote needed change. The moral: Libs will excuse any lie, disregard any principle, knife any ally, as long as they see it as advancing "the greater good." The greater good, of course, being defined as what they choose to inflict on the masses.
So, you want a 'reasonable response'?
You won't get it here; nobody here is the least bit interested in reason, or if they are, you're not interested in what they have to say. Even Mr. Baker, who rose to the challenge, didn't actually answer the question.
Besides, I hardly need to remind you what that great Christian fellow Luther had to say about reason:
“Reason is the Devil’s greatest whore; by nature and manner of being she is a noxious whore; she is a prostitute, the Devil’s appointed whore; whore eaten by scab and leprosy who ought to be trodden under foot and destroyed, she and her wisdom… Throw dung in her face to make her ugly. She is and she ought to be drowned in baptism… She would deserve, the wretch, to be banished to the filthiest place in the house, to the closets.”
Of course, there's also the possibility that your regular fans have just gone away for the weekend. They have other things to concern them, such as making sure the children are settled in at school, getting out the blankets for the football season...you know, important stuff; not looking for a coded message in a tree ornament in the White House last Christmas.
It's sad to see you disintegrating in public like this.
BTW, don't ask me for an explanation, either (See paragraph 1).
Good points, Gary. Many liberal/progressives would not (and don't) admit the unholy union between the Nazi socialists and the Communist socialists. And when they ultimately turned against each other, it was the perfect excuse to place blame on "the right" for Hitler's Nazi propaganda and the horrors of the holocaust. What amazes me is their lies about Hitler being a Christian! That's insane! Do they have no shame?
And you are correct. The progressives DO "choose to inflict" their own warped ideas of a pseudo-utopian type of "dream" that in actuality never helps mankind in his or her existence! Such ideology only ends up harming them! But do they learn from their mistakes? No. Do they learn from history? Hell no! The moral of the story is this: socialism, communism, Islamism, and any other kind of "ism" they come up with ARE ALL VERY BAD FOR MANKIND!
GM,
Christianity is a reasonable faith. Check out Greenleaf's essay on the subject.
When "reason" is used for evil and nefarious causes and then utilized for the advancement of the misery of mankind, then Luther's assessment is dead on. When "reason" is used to negate, twist, or compromise what the Bible - God's Word - says is truth, then it is being used in a way that is harmful to mankind. All of this may affect where an individual will end up in eternity.
And, it isn't just about a "tree ornament" at Christmas. It's about the people (socialists, communists, Islamists - you know ALL THE RADICALS) that Obama surrounds himself with in his administration. Please see the latest episode of The Glenn Beck program: Glenn Beck Show- September 20, 2010
NewZeal.blogspot.com
The Blaze Mix Video! Top 20 Pro-Socialism Sound Bites of Obama, Advisors & Allies- Share With Your Friends!
Tonight: Opponents want to paint the Tea Party movement as extremist. In fact, The New York Times is now
reporting that the President's economic advisers are now looking for ways to help democrats alter the course of
the midterm elections. The other option Obama is considering is an attack on the Tea Party, attempting to paint
them as radicals..effectively saying- 'you can't vote for the GOP- they're in bed with radicals!' Tonight, you decide- How do you define a radical? What is an extremist? How do progressives define radicals and extremists
.
Post a Comment