Thursday, January 22, 2009

Obama Schizophrenic Syndrome (Updated)

There will be a moment in time, coming on the horizon, where many who voted for Obama will finally wake up, feel the intense grief and finally say (perhaps privately) what have we done?? That moment may have subconciously already happened for several hundred thousand ObamaBorg Bots who attended the inauguration. Despite all of the euphoria of that day, many actually admitted that they were left with a nagging, downsided feeling while stating "what do we do now?"

Last night, I saw Rush Limbaugh on Hannity. Much of what he said was dead-on truth. He, like many millions of conservatives who already surmised that Obama was trouble for our nation, exposed much truth about how this hyped-up man slithered into the presidency - unvetted and unknown; terribly dangerous policy wise and wrapped up in Marxist ideology. We already know most certainly (if Obama Sr. was his true father) that he is ineligible for the office of POTUS according to our U.S. Constitution's "natural born citizen" clause.

Late last night, I read Lame Cherry's post, The Limbaugh Paradox. It's brilliant! An absolutely eye opening post. It is truthfully presented - warts and all. It is one of those rare, "I don't care if I'm being politically incorrect" evaluations of what the author explains and labels as "Obama Schizophrenic Syndrome."

Go read it!

Read it all and then come back here to share your thoughts!

One thing is for sure. We the People who already knew all about the corruption surrounding Obama, his multitude of lies, his abandonment syndrome by the desertion of his fathers in his life, his narcissim, his evil associations, his terrible pro-infanticide "he never knew an abortion that he didn't like" political position, and his on the "down low" homosexual liasions (Larry Sinclair and the unsolved murder of Trinity church's Donald Young) - which probably explains why he supports so much of the gay agenda extremism views - will all have to finally be exposed.

Mark my words. It will be us conservatives, and all patriots who support our U.S. Constitution who will need to come to the rescue and clean up after Obama's huge mess.

Of course, the mess is just beginning. I hope and pray that Orly Taitz's lawsuit will get the truth exposed, once and for all, and force Obama to reveal all that he has been hiding. Why would anyone prevent any judge or the public from seeing his papers - including his vault-length COLB - unless he has something to hide? Until this is resolved, millions of people will see Obama as a usurper who is ineligible for the office he now fraudulently occupies.

We the People will pursue this issue no matter what!

We are committed to exposing the truth!

We are about justice!

We are members of the United States of America - a Constitutional Republic of the people, for the people and by the people!

We are NOT going away! We refuse to let a usurper get away with trashing our Constitution!

What's more, true American patriots will NOT GIVE UP THE FIGHT!

Hat Tips:

Lame Cherry

Citizen Wells

Additional related links:

Apparently, many brave patriots in our awesome military agree! Please read: The Obama Oxymoron

Even MORE GOOD NEWS! The The Federal Grand Jury (5th Amendment) option!


An Uneasy Feeling by Pajamas Media

Concluding excerpt:

Another modest prediction

As Obama begins to govern and as the public sees that he simply borrowed Bush’s foreign policy rhetoric, jazzed it up with his cadences and pauses, and then took either Bushites or Democratic centrists and called them hope and change, and as he glued new rhetorical veneers on the Patriot Act and FISA, and as he alienates many by making decisions other than voting present, and as the gaffes begin (Biden and Michelle can’t be put under wraps forever), and the Chicago fumes linger (Blago ain’t through yet), the fawning media will begin to look embarrassed, then ridiculous, and finally completely bankrupt. They offered no audit of Obama, no tough treatment, no honest examination of his flips, no balance in their treatment of Bush, and they will soon pay a terrible price for that derelection and worse, as the public sees them as the state megaphones that they have so sadly become. The only suspense? Will they play Pravda to the end?
The point of all this? Excuse me, but as a cynic I confess the politics of the left are now about power, ego, status, and the notion of control, rather than genuine concern for the planet, or the creed of egalitarianism or for freedoms of the people. The conservative grandee at least lives by his unapologetic creed, one that we sometimes abhor, but accept is consistent with the natural law of the jungle in that the stronger and more capable claim that that they deserve a greater material reward for their greater accomplishments or, barring that, even unabashedly for their greater luck in being born lucky.

But for the leftist. the desire for wealth, status, exceptional treatment, all this earns the additional wages of hypocrisy. We all know the conservative failing—that a Larry Craig or Mark Foley who preaches constraint and traditional values are themselves slaves to nefarious and destructive appetites. But ignored are their liberal counterparts in hypocrisy—that men and women of the people no more wish to live as the people than the rich they so loudly despise. If some conservatives adopt the patina of a Cato’s stern agrarian conservatism to mask their own weakness for drink, or drug, or sex, then at least grant such psychological states exist for many liberals who demand global parity as a sort of psychological get out of jail card for their cravings for money, status, and privilege.

What is missing in the description about conservatives is the fact that they, without doubt, give more money and donations to churches, charities, missionaries, natural disaster funds etc. than the liberals do. This includes even the very rich liberals!

So, where does the rich, Soros-type far leftists money go?

To fraudulent political candidates (like Obama's) campaigns.
To corrupt politicians (again, like Obama).
Every nefarious organization you could think of including pro-abortion infanticide organizations and the radical homosexual indoctrination agenda and their political organizations.
Nutroots groups like Code Pink.
Used to fund illegal voting registration and practices the likes of ACORN.
Used to employ thugs outside of voting precincts to intimidate voters.
Used to employ Internet ObamaBorg Bots to "fight the smears" against their ObamaFuhrer.
(please feel free to add to this list in comments)

That's where.


Ted said...

Take the test.

FIRST QUESTION: Who IS the actual and lawful 44th President of the USA?

ANSWER: Joe Biden

Biden was initially the Acting President for at least 5 minutes under either the Constitution’s Article 2 or the Constitution’s 20th Amendment, from 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, having already taken his Oath of Office and before Obama completed his ‘oath’ at approximately 12:05 PM, 1/20/09. Under the 20th Amendment if the President-elect shall have failed to qualify, or alternatively under Article 2 if the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term, being 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, which ability and/or qualification includes that he take the Article 2 oath “before he enter on the execution of his office,” then either the Presidency shall devolve on the Vice President under Article 2 or the Vice President shall act as President under the 20th Amendment. (The importance of the oath in ‘commencing’ an ‘Obama Presidency’ — rather than merely the 1/20/09 Noon time — is confirmed by the re-take of the ‘oath’ by Obama at the White House on 1/21/09 after the first ‘oath’ was NOT administered by Justice Roberts NOR recited by Obama in the words as required under Article 2.)

This is significant because at such time that the Supreme Court finally rules on the merits on Obama’s disqualification as not being an Article 2 “natural born citizen” (clearly he is NOT), Biden’s automatic status (without needing to take a separate Presidential Oath) of being President would be predicated upon four different bases: First, having been Vice President under Article 2; second, having been Vice President-elect under the 20th Amendment; third, having been actual President in the hiatus before Obama took the ‘oath(s)’; and fourth, retroactively deemed President during the full period of the Obama usurpation so that the acts of the Federal Government under the usurpation can be deemed authorized and/or ratified by Biden’s legitimacy.

SECOND QUESTION: Who will be the 45th President?

ANSWER: Hillary Clinton

One must assume that Bill and Hillary Clinton have been aware of all of the above. Biden’s wife recently “let the cat out of the bag” on the Oprah Show that both Biden and Hillary had considered alternatively Veep or Secretary of State, in either case, setting up Hillary to be President on a vote of the Democratic Congress if need be.

THIRD QUESTION: Is Obama an unwitting victim of this troika or a knowing participant?

ANSWER: Yet undetermined.

spud tooley said...

how sad that you continue in this vein.

how sad that you do not see the good the man is doing, and offer prayers that God will bless the man and our country. (i'm not reading any further down this page to see what your comments were about warren's prayer...)

how sad that your view of the world is so narrow that you cannot remove the blinders you've worn for the past eight years and see how things really are.

here's the thing that you and obama have in common: matthew 7:16.

so far, his fruit appears to be maturing very well and, given time and the appropriate caretaking by our nation of garderners, will nurse us all to better health over the next 4-8 years.

yours, of course, remains what it's always been: an apple, pleasing to the eye...

mike rucker
fairburn, georgia, usa

Christinewjc said...

Spud -

How sad it is that you chose to comment without even reading the entire post or links

I can see that you choose to remain in Blue Pill la la land - just like the rest of the Obama drones.

Spud Tooley: See no evil, hear no evil - just speak evil towards those he disagrees with without even reading the entire post!

If you don't like what I write or link to (but, of course, how would you know since you didn't even READ IT!) then go back into your cocoon of imagined Obamautopia.

"There are none so blind as those who will not see." *(see below)

God's Word has a lot to say about "blindness" and "deafness" to the truth:

Psa 146:8 The LORD openeth [the eyes of] the blind: the LORD raiseth them that are bowed down: the LORD loveth the righteous:

Isa 29:18 And in that day shall the deaf hear the words of the book, and the eyes of the blind shall see out of obscurity, and out of darkness.

Isa 35:5 Then the eyes of the blind shall be opened, and the ears of the deaf shall be unstopped.

Isa 42:7 To open the blind eyes, to bring out the prisoners from the prison, [and] them that sit in darkness out of the prison house.

Isa 42:16 And I will bring the blind by a way [that] they knew not; I will lead them in paths [that] they have not known: I will make darkness light before them, and crooked things straight. These things will I do unto them, and not forsake them.

Isa 42:18 Hear, ye deaf; and look, ye blind, that ye may see.

Mat 15:14 Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.

Mat 23:24 [Ye] blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.

Luk 6:39 And he spake a parable unto them, Can the blind lead the blind? shall they not both fall into the ditch?

Jhn 9:39 And Jesus said, For judgment I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind.

Rev 3:17 Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked:

Rev 3:18 I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and [that] the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see.

Rev 3:19 As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.

Rev 3:20 Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.

Rev 3:21 To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.

Rev 3:22 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.

Oh and btw, if you think that Obama is going to get away with freezing President Bush's executive orders and/or his thugs enabling a website scrubbing of the SCOTUS dockets of the upcoming lawsuits against him, think again. It may take a while, but we DO have the recourse of:

The Federal Grand Jury (5th Amendment)

* Matthew 13:13
: : : 13:13 Therefore I speak to them in parables: because they seeing
: : : see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand

: : : Jeremiah 5:21
: : : Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not:

: : : Isaiah 6:9-10
: : : And he said, Go, and tell this people, Hear you indeed, but understand not; and see indeed, but perceive not.
: : : Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and convert, and be healed.

: : "Random House Dictionary of Popular Proverbs and Sayings" by Gregory Y. Titelman (Random House, New York, 1996). Mr. Titelman agrees that this saying has its roots in the Bible, specifically Jer. 5:21 (King James version): "Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not."

: : "There are none so blind as those who will not see. The most deluded people are those who choose to ignore what they already know. The proverb has been traced back in English to 1546 (John Heywood), and resembles the Biblical verse quoted (above). In 1738, it was used by Jonathan Swift in his 'Polite Conversation,' and is first attested in the United States in the 1713 'Works of Thomas Chalkley'..."

spud tooley said...

ted, you crack me up.

here's a secret: alice in wonderland was FICTION. hate to break that news to you, but you obviously have a very clear problem differentiating reality from fairy tales.

if the events in your comment (obama->biden->hillary, or maybe it's biden->obama->biden->hillary, or maybe bob->carol->ted->alice->biden->obama->biden->hillary) come to pass, i will shave my head.

of course, if (when) they don't, i expect you to do the same.

fair? if you really believe the nonsense you keep propagating - and i would accuse you of being a completely unChristian gossiper, but i've yet to see anything to make me assume you are a Christian - then put your scissors where your scalp is.