When Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse gave a news conference on March 1, 2012, there were dozens of news cameras present in the audience, taping the event. There were even several questions asked after all of the evidence had been shown. But what kind of questions did the news people ask? Mostly "gotcha" type questions designed to get the investigators to admit that they are "birthers" out to accuse Obama of fraud. I did not hear ONE person ask any questions about the devastating evidence that was presented that will require additional investigation. I didn't hear ONE news person ask about the "person of interest" that was mentioned as a possible forger of the COLB for Obama. I did not hear ONE news person ask about the evidence for the forgery of Obama's Selective Service form. I ask you, if this case had been evidence against former President George W. Bush, would the media have treated it with silence this way? Of course not! We have seen how the media blasts all their proverbial guns at the GOP candidates, but remains mute about such a big case against Obama.
Two George Orwell quotes shared by Citizen Wells:
“The past is whatever the records and the memories agree upon.
And since the party is in full control of all records, and in
equally full control of the minds of it’s members, it follows
that the past is whatever the party chooses to make it. Six
means eighteen, two plus two equals five, war is peace,
freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength.”…George Orwell, “1984″
“If the party could thrust its hand into the past and say
of this and that event, it never happened–that, surely,
was more terrifying than mere torture and death.”…George Orwell, “1984″
Apparently, the news people did not report on the press conference. Media of mass deception blackout...once again!
In what some might call a completely unrelated case, there is much suspicion regarding the death of Conservative Activist, Andrew Breitbart. I mentioned this in the comment section of a previous post, but I wondered why the media of mass deception immediately trotted out the idea that Breitbart died "of natural causes." An autopsy has been done and it will take 6 - 8 weeks for the results.
At least SOMEONE is asking questions about Breitbart's sudden death!
Consider this latest compelling evidence of double-standard bias:
At the very time that the media was so forcefully focusing on religion-related remarks made by Santorum, news broke that a court in Iran had just ordered a 34-year-old married father of two to be put to death for converting from Islam to Christianity. And supposedly, not a single journalist in the mainstream media connected the dots between that action and these incredibly foolish and manifestly false words that Barack Obama had said about Islam:
Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance.
Obama said this in his June 2009 Cairo speech that the media praised to the high heavens -- literally. Remember how Newsweek editor Evan Thomas gushed: "Obama's standing above the country, above-above the world, he's sort of God...he's the teacher"?
How can it be that it did not occur to a single one of the best and brightest of America's major news media journalists that it might be interesting to ask Barack Obama if, in light of an Iranian court's ordering a death sentence for the crime of converting to Christianity, he still stands by his assertion that Islam shows us "the possibilities of religious tolerance"?
While gleefully pouring controversy over Santorum, as they would with any conservative, they covered for Obama by not asking him obvious questions that would have stirred up controversy that would still be raging. Such as:
Which specific words and deeds did Obama have in mind that made him conclude that Islam was demonstrating for us "the possibilities of religious tolerance"?
Does this ordered execution for conversion from Islam cause Obama to reconsider his view that Islam equals religious tolerance?
A media that did not see itself as playing a supporting role in Obama's re-election campaign would have a field day contrasting this stark fact of barbaric intolerance with Obama's mind-bogglingly foolish false praise.
[Blind] followers never question.
The media do not put such tough, embarrassing questions to Obama because they see themselves as his allies and their role as his protectors.
And, if they thought that the Obama college days videos would "go away" with Breitbart's death, they were WRONG!
The last person who probably saw Breitbart said he looked fine.
Another high profile conservative, Rush Limbaugh, was recently targeted!
THE question that I have been asking for quite some time now:
********
Yes readers...it certainly is an Orwellian world out there.
Hat tips to all links.
1 comment:
More on Michael Savage's comments about the possibility that Andrew Breitbart was murdered:
WND - Michael Savage: Was Breitbart Assassinated?
Post a Comment