Saturday, June 21, 2008

Where's MSM Fairness in Vetting Candidates?

Zachjonesishome has some very important and pertinent questions for the obviously rabid, messiah-like-worshipping, pro-Obama MSM:

Where is the concept of fairness within the MSM when it comes to vetting the candidates?

Excerpt:




If These Three Strikes Were Committed By Sen. John McCain
The United States Main Stream Media Would Have Called Senator John McCain OUT!



The Critical Question:

Do we have an impartial umpire calling the 2008 Presidential Election?


It is clear from the actions of Senator Obama, that he has little or no appreciation for the laws, customs and traditions of The United States of America.


It is clear from his actions that he believes that any such laws, customs and traditions should only apply to the bitter people who cling to their guns and religion.



Curious? Continue reading here.

HT: Zachjonesishome

*******
Update:

Oh my...our namby-pamby Barack Obambi* press is absolutely clueless!!

HT: *Credit goes to The Obambi.com blog for my borrowing of the term "Obambi." It just fit so well!

P.S. Warning...bad language at the "Obambi" link. But the photos and commentary are hilarious!


Hey! Sometimes we need to laugh at the goings-on during this election circus...er... circuit!



*******
And....
No matter where you stand and/or what you think about Larry Sinclair's accusations against Barack Obama, Zach Jones has written an excellent op-ed piece regarding the far left's effort to squelch free speech that they don't like:

What Right Is There That Is Greater And More Precious Than The Right Of Freedom Of Expression? None!


Just look at the new push for the oxymoronic and deceptively titled, "Fairness Doctrine."

Related blog posts:

Audacity of Hypocrisy: Did Obama Commit Crime with Faux-Presidential Seal?

Buyers Remorse: An Obama Supporter Now Has Doubts Video

*******
Update 6/22/08

Loyal Obamatons zapped if their blogs get "out of line"

How creepier can this get???

Excerpt:



Diane,I have found this warning message only today.

I am perplexed with confusing thoughts.

A blogger wrote yesterday “they give you only one warning before removing an account” Is this correct?

I checked ACTIVITY in my profile, and NO comments are marked there as REMOVED

I have not posted anything obscene or offensive. But I made about 30 comments on 6/3. between calling to South Dakota. So could you send me the comment which was removed? Such procedure certainly would help people like me. Infiltrators know very well WHY they get a warning. I truly don’t. I would learn from it.

On 6/2 and 6/3 I spent CONSIDERABLE amount of time sending alerts about INFILTRATOR POSTS which I judged as injurious to our purpose. (I see them today as well but am reluctant to act at all on anything). I made a mention of that in a comment, so may be I was reported as revenge. BTW alerting is time consuming and I do not get points for the alerts.

Seeing this comment of mine which someone deemed offensive would enable me to verify it was really mine – and not made by someone else by infiltrating my account. I have read several stories in the last 3 days of just that happening.. No one has access to my computer at my place.

I have NOTED “something going on” with people accounts and emotions in these last 3 or 4 days. This is discouraging and distressing. Accounts busted and (nice) people afraid to comment and leaving. Do not let it happen.

7. The campaign is very well aware that behind every TRUE supporter of Barack on this blog there is an incredible amount of emotions. I cannot tell you how I am feeling today. I gave you my LIFE in these last 4 months as well as 1/7th of my earnings this year. I went broke in February but donated.

To finish – if supporters like me are under a threat of termination on the basis of what I have described, this means that there is something very very wrong happening to the campaign and its future goals. I think my profile can be a clue. And I have done much more.

Here are some more Obamatons, freaking out that a person using the name “JFKFan” was banned: Barack Obama : : Change We Can Believe In Independent support: Really!


Marxism is not only the future with Obama...it's already reigning in his campaign!

HT: LGF

*******
Update @ 8:03 a.m. PT 6/22/08

Right Wing Nut House: Obama Starting To Creep Me Out

Apparently, I'm not the only one who thinks Obama is CREEPY!

LOTS of great additional posts at that blog!

6 comments:

Christinewjc said...

Updates to this post:

Update:

Oh my...our namby-pamby Barack Obambi* press is absolutely clueless!!

HT: *Credit goes to The Obambi.com blog for my borrowing of the term "Obambi." It just fit so well!

P.S. Warning...bad language at the "Obambi" link. But the photos and commentary are hilarious!


Hey! Sometimes we need to laugh at the goings-on during this election circus...er... circuit!

*******
And....
No matter where you stand and/or what you think about Larry Sinclair's accusations against Barack Obama, Zach Jones has written an excellent op-ed piece regarding the far left's effort to squelch free speech that they don't like:

What Right Is There That Is Greater And More Precious Than The Right Of Freedom Of Expression? None.

Just look at the new push for the oxymoronic and deceptively titled, "Fairness Doctrine."

Related blog posts:

Audacity of Hypocrisy: Did Obama Commit Crime with Faux-Presidential Seal?

Buyers Remorse: An Obama Supporter Now Has Doubts Video

*******
Update 6/22/08

Loyal Obamatons zapped if their blogs get "out of line"

How creepier can this get???

Excerpt:



Diane,I have found this warning message only today.

I am perplexed with confusing thoughts.

A blogger wrote yesterday “they give you only one warning before removing an account” Is this correct?

I checked ACTIVITY in my profile, and NO comments are marked there as REMOVED

I have not posted anything obscene or offensive. But I made about 30 comments on 6/3. between calling to South Dakota. So could you send me the comment which was removed? Such procedure certainly would help people like me. Infiltrators know very well WHY they get a warning. I truly don’t. I would learn from it.

On 6/2 and 6/3 I spent CONSIDERABLE amount of time sending alerts about INFILTRATOR POSTS which I judged as injurious to our purpose. (I see them today as well but am reluctant to act at all on anything). I made a mention of that in a comment, so may be I was reported as revenge. BTW alerting is time consuming and I do not get points for the alerts.

Seeing this comment of mine which someone deemed offensive would enable me to verify it was really mine – and not made by someone else by infiltrating my account. I have read several stories in the last 3 days of just that happening.. No one has access to my computer at my place.

I have NOTED “something going on” with people accounts and emotions in these last 3 or 4 days. This is discouraging and distressing. Accounts busted and (nice) people afraid to comment and leaving. Do not let it happen.

7. The campaign is very well aware that behind every TRUE supporter of Barack on this blog there is an incredible amount of emotions. I cannot tell you how I am feeling today. I gave you my LIFE in these last 4 months as well as 1/7th of my earnings this year. I went broke in February but donated.

To finish – if supporters like me are under a threat of termination on the basis of what I have described, this means that there is something very very wrong happening to the campaign and its future goals. I think my profile can be a clue. And I have done much more.

Here are some more Obamatons, freaking out that a person using the name “JFKFan” was banned: Barack Obama : : Change We Can Believe In Independent support: Really!


Marxism is not only the future with Obama...it's already reigning in his campaign!

HT: LGF

Christinewjc said...

Update @ 8:03 a.m. PT 6/22/08

Right Wing Nut House: Obama Starting To Creep Me Out

Apparently, I'm not the only one who thinks Obama is CREEPY!

LOTS of great additional posts at that blog!

Christinewjc said...

Why Is Fox News Protecting Obama?

That's what I would like to know!! Something has drastically changed at that channel. When E.D. Hill had her show dropped from the schedule (was she also fired?) just because she questioned whether or not the fist bump that Barack and Michele did after a campaign speech could, perhaps, be a terrorist type of action, I knew that that the kid gloves were now on at Fox.

Hill's comment could have just been laughed off. Why so sensitive? Why punish her so harshly?

Why the removal of the flag pins from their lapels? Our fight against Islamo-fascist terrorism is not over! If they were forced to do this because the bosses at Fox thought it might show favoritism towards John McCain...GIVE ME A FREAKIN' BREAK!! It shows PATRIOTISM TOWARDS OUR NATION AND SUPPORT FOR OUR TROOPS FIGHTING FOR OUR FREEDOM IN HARMS WAY!

After reading that article link and the comments, I can't help but wonder if George Soros is secretly working behind the scenes at Fox. He's got every other news outlet bought...doesn't he?

I have switched to watching local news reports. I also now listen to Talk Radio instead of the Fox shows that I used to watch. Fox has officially lost my once loyal viewership.

Christinewjc said...

Well now...

How is THIS for a whopper of a rumor?

an observer Says:
Wednesday, June 25, 2008 at 7:00 am
Larry’s story will get recognized and reported by the media as scheduled.
Per the Republican leadership, after August.
Or, maybe per the following assessment:

Al Gore is attempting to throw around his considerable weight, in and around the Barack Obama Presidential campaign–and so far, the Obama people are buying into Gore’s perfidy. Sources close to the Obama campaign confirm that Fat Albert has been designated as the “heavy-weight” to handle the thorny relations with both Democratic National Chairman Howard “Scream” Dean, and Senator Hillary Clinton. The sources confirm that a virtual state of war exists between the Obama campaign and Howard Dean, over the DNC chairman’s savaging of the party’s finances, and his jealous attempts to hold onto power, in the face of Obama campaign demands that the main DNC functions be relocated to Obama headquarters in Chicago. There are also reports that a true “falling out among thieves” is unfolding between Dean and his patron, George Soros.

Al Gore’s patrons have no intention of having Obama actually win the Presidency. They have simply used him to stop Hillary Clinton from winning the Democratic Presidential nomination, and once that has been accomplished, they intend to throw Obama overboard, through any one of the many scandals they have set to unleash, through such British media operatives as Rupert Murdoch. The very same “Beaverbrook” press apparatus that built Obama up, to unseat Hillary Clinton, is prepared to bring him down. The problem for London remains, however, that Hillary Clinton is not altogether out of the race, as her legions of loyal supporters have shown, by their efforts to force an open convention in Denver. Were Obama to be brought down, Hillary Clinton would remain the only legitimate alternative–in the eyes of the vast majority of Democratic and independent voters. It is no secret, in Democratic Party inner sanctums, that Al Gore is positioning himself to step into the vacuum, if Obama is forced out before the late August convention in Denver. Gore is the “ace in the hole,” to assure that Hillary Clinton, with her 18 million backers, is blocked from the nomination.

While some of Senator Obama’s leading campaign operatives understand that they are now in a battle with Howard “Scream” Dean, there is no indication, as of yet, that they understand the threat posed by Al Gore.


Can you possibly imagine the carnage if this were to actually happen???

I REALLY hope that it's just a made-up rumor...

But knowing the rabid, radical leftist Dems - I should not be surprised if this were part of the secret goings-on in the Dem party.

UGH!!!

Our election process - at the hands of Soros and the Dems - has literally been turned into a circus of craziness!!

Makes me sick!!

Anonymous said...

Newsweek recently (06-22-2008) ran an article about about a $10,000-a-Month psychic, despite the fact that there has never been a shred of scientific proof in psychic powers.

So here’s a little question for supporters of Larry Sinclair : If Newsweek is willing to run an article about a psychic despite the fact that it CANNOT be proven whether psychic powers exist, why have they shown no interest in Sinclair’s story? Can’t figure it out?

The only reasonable answer is that the psychic has more credibility

ZachJonesishome said...

ZachJonesIsHome - I have a 4th of July post up that I think you might find interesting. I have been posting it around with the following message:
Senator Obama’s Patriotism – What it means to this Navy Veteran. I hope you consider the following article: Senator Obama's Patriotism - a Veteran's Perspective
It is found at:
http://zachjonesishome.wordpress.com/senator-obama%e2%80%99s-patriotism-a-veteran%e2%80%99s-perspective/