Wednesday, October 15, 2008

At last! The Smoking Gun!

This article could be the game-changer McCain and Palin need. It clearly exposes Obama for the criminal and thug supporter he really is!

read more digg story

Also, don't miss this little gem of an article about Michele Obama trying to cover for her husband's crimes!

Michele Obama Calls Corsi 'evil'.

*******
Update on Michele Obama article:

Some are questioning the validity of that particular phone conversation. However, there is MUCH MORE to read! (see "America's Right" link below) - which includes a link to An American Ex-Pat in Southeast Asia - a site that I have linked to several times over the past 9 months concerning Obama.

Here's that site's current frontpage: An American Expat in Southeast Asia

America's Right.


*******
Update:

Here is a direct link to the "African Press International" original article:

Shocking development: Mrs Obama decides enough is enough: “My husband was born in Hawaii and adopted by his step father, does that make him unpatriotic; she asks”, on a direct telephone to API.

Since the story has generated so much interest, the following has been added:


Published by African Press International - API

——————————

ADDED HERE BELOW DUE TO HUGE INTEREST ON THE ABOVE STORY. (TIME 16:08 Scandinavian time)

Verification of the story:
We have found it necessary to publish a telephone number that can be used to reach us should anyone doubt the story. We are doing this because of many requests by many people who want to know more abouth[sic] the story.

We are able to receive calls tomorrow the 16th of October through to the 18th October. We find it important that our readers get the truth and not be misled in any way. This is a true story and we stand by everyone [sic] written.

NB: For verification, we can be reached on 004793299739



Commenters are asking for proof. Is there an audio-tape?

Some are cautious because of the obvious misspellings.


Of course, there are several different contributors to the site. Some are obvious supporters of Obama - like this one:

Just What Did Jerome Corsi Hope to Achieve?

So, if this is just a rumor, why would the site let it stand?

So far, this is another one of the "TalkWisdom Reports, You Decide" posts.

*******
Update:

While reading through the comments at "African Press," found this one written by Philip J. Berg, who had filed the lawsuit against Barack Obama:

Philip J. Berg, Esquire Says:
October 15, 2008 at 5:46 pm
This article confirms what I, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, have been arguing for months for all of the citizens of the United States that Obama is “not” qualified to be President of the United States, as required by our U.S. Constitution!

Our U.S. Constitution states that the “qualifications” for President are: 1) be thirty-five [35] years of age; 2) live in the United States for fourteen [14] years; and 3) be a “natural born” citizen. Obama fulfills the 1st two “qualifications,” but fails in the 3rd.

If Obama’s wife, Michelle’s version is correct, she confirms what I alleged, that Obama was either “adopted” or “acknowledged” by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro. Mrs. Obama states Obama was “adopted.”

The adoption means that when Obama returned to the United States, if he came through U.S. Immigration, Obama would only be “naturalized” and therefore ineligible to be President. If Obama did not go through U.S. Immigration, he would be an illegal alien and therefore not only be ineligible to be President, but also ineligible to be U.S. Senator from Illinois and subject to deportation.

Thank you - Michelle Obama !


*******
YET ANOTHER UPDATE:

ANOTHER LAWSUIT HAS BEEN FILED!

Averting a Crisis in Confidence; Citizen files Lawsuit Against Washington Secretary of State Sam Reed demanding verification of Barack Obama’s citizenship status.

12 comments:

spud tooley said...

did you watch frontline on pbs last night?

read my post here.

have a good wednesday, christine.

mike rucker
fairburn, georgia, usa

Christinewjc said...

Mike,

PBS is just another member of the liberal "Media of Mass Deception." They, like all the rest, refuse to expose what the New Media on the Internet has exposed. The truth about Barack Hussein Obama and his rise to power - backed by liberal billionaires, criminal entities and foreign thugs.

From the beginning, the thing that solidified my own personal decision to never vote for Obama was his pro-abortion stance.
The fact that he voted against the Born Alive Infants Protection Act as a state senator in Illinois, plus spoke out against the bill as a U.S. senator (no one else did - not even Clinton, Kennedy or any of the other far left Democrats) showed me that he would take abortion to the level of infanticide under the ruse of claiming "choice."

The second thing that bothers me about Obama is his refusal to answer the judge's call for proof of his U.S. citizenship. Why won't he show his “vault” long version authentic birth certificate?

Recall that when John McCain's eligibility to become POTUS was called into question, he provided the proof! Why won't Obama?

All he and his cronies do is call every point of question about him, his associations, his proof of citizenship, his abysmal voting record, his constant change of mind for political expediancy etc. is to label them all a "distraction," a "smear," or "racism."

The place of birth question has not been proven by Obama nor shown to the judge who has asked for it. Why???

If this was just all rumor and innuendo, then why doesn't he live up to his "fight the smears" mantra and provide the necessary proof of his eligibility to be POTUS?

Here is the Berg vs. Obama lawsuit in a nutshell:

Our U.S. Constitution states that the “qualifications” for President are: 1) be thirty-five [35] years of age; 2) live in the United States for fourteen [14] years; and 3) be a “natural born” citizen. Obama fulfills the 1st two “qualifications,” but fails in the 3rd.

If Obama’s wife, Michelle’s version is correct, she confirms what I alleged, that Obama was either “adopted” or “acknowledged” by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro. Mrs. Obama states Obama was “adopted.”

The adoption means that when Obama returned to the United States, if he came through U.S. Immigration, Obama would only be “naturalized” and therefore ineligible to be President. If Obama did not go through U.S. Immigration, he would be an illegal alien and therefore not only be ineligible to be President, but also ineligible to be U.S. Senator from Illinois and subject to deportation.

This means 1 of 2 things:

a) Barack Hussein Obama (AKA: Barry Soretoro) would be a naturalized citizen and ineligible to run for POTUS or
b) Barack Hussein Obama (AKA: Barry Soretero) is an ILLEGAL ALIEN and has committed fraud numerous times including his ineligibility to be a US Senator and could and should be deported if not arrested and tried and jailed!

This ONE ISSUE ALONE - according to the rules for eligibility as outlined in our U.S. Constitution - to be a U.S. Senator and/or U.S. President; is reason enough to disqualify him from the presidency.

Doesn't it bother you...even just a little bit...that the MMD (Media of Mass Deception) refuses to report about the Berg lawsuit?

Yet, they made such a huge deal over Gov. Palin's "troopergate" false claims.

Something really stinks - and it's the putrid lies, deceit, and non-reporting of Obama's crimes that the 98% of liberals that run the Media of Mass Deception and who want their Obamaessiah to win - no matter how much it would hurt and ruin our country.

Matt W. said...

Hey Christine,
I wish I had the time to read all of your posts, but I'll chime in when I can.
On Obama, I could go on and on for hours about why Obama shouldn't be President, but I don't like arguments that smell funny to me, and I have to say, the one about his citizenship smells funny to me.

I have just one question, doesn't the fact that his Mother was a US Citizen make him and Natural Born Citizen?

Admittedly, when the question is asked the proof should be pretty stinking easy for him to provide, and he should do so without argument. In fact, simply doing so would give him a pretty good boost in the polls, so I don't know why he wouldn't do so, which makes it a legitimate question after the fact, but a dangerous issue to raise ahead of time.

Raises the question for me though, shouldn't this be an automatic issue for getting on the ballot for President? Should everyone automatically have to provide proof of Constitutional Qualification prior to being allowed to run? Wouldn't that avoid all of this?

Also, if indeed he were a Naturalized Citizen, while he would not be qualified to be President, it would not bar him from being a Senator.

Christinewjc said...

Hi Matt,

Nice to see you back!

If you care to "catch up" on this lawsuit, go to this website:

Obama Crimes.com

Here is the latest post which addresses your question about why - even if Obama WAS born in Hawaii, then adopted and moved to Indonesia - he would be ineligible to run for president:

Times-Herald: Born in the U.S.A.?
Monday, 25 August 2008 16:45 administrator By: KEITH PHUCAS, Times Herald Staff - 08/25/2008
PHILADELPHIA - A Lafayette Hill attorney filed a lawsuit in federal court Thursday challenging Sen. Barack Obama's claim to United States citizenship. The action seeks to remove the Democratic candidate from the November ballot.
To be eligible to serve as U.S. president, a person must be born in this country. According to Obama's birth certificate, which his campaign posted on its Internet site in June to quell rumors that he is foreign born, the Illinois senator was born in Hawaii on Aug. 6, 1961.
On Thursday, Philip Berg filed a temporary restraining order in federal court to bar Obama from running for president, claiming the Democratic candidate was actually born in Africa.
"We really don't believe he was born in Hawaii," Berg said. "We think he was born in Kenya."
The presidential candidate's father, Barack Obama Sr., was born and raised in a small village in Kenya, according to Obama's campaign Web site.
Berg's suit claims the senator's grandmother, brother and sister, who live in Kenya, believe they were present during Obama's birth in the African country.
Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, grew up in Kansas, and his parents met at the University of Hawaii when Dunham was a student there, according to the Obama campaign.
Eventually, Obama's father returned to Kenya, and his son grew up in Hawaii with his mother and for a few years in Indonesia after Dunham married an Indonesian man, Lolo Soetoro. Also, Obama lived with his maternal grandparents in Hawaii.
"If he was born in Hawaii, and he was adopted in Indonesia by Lolo Soetoro, (Obama) would lose his citizenship," Berg said.

Complete story at the Times-Herald

You are correct about his eligibility to be a senator if he is a "naturalized citizen" (similar to Arnold Schwartzeneggar), but BOTH men would be ineligible to be president.

Christinewjc said...

P.S. The Hawaii "birth certificate" that went around the internet and was posted at the Obama campaign site was a forgery - FYI. Plus, it isn't the documentation that the judge requires. It is supposed to be his "vault" long version authentic birth certificate.

Christinewjc said...

Here's a link to Obama Crimes front page. Also, you can see updates in my sidebar.

spud tooley said...

in 1865 the united states came out of the darkest period in its history as a deeply scarred and deeply divided nation. somehow, the country was able to believe again in the brotherhood that all americans shared and began to put things back together. grant and lincoln made sure the north did not lord over the confederacy, that the slaves continued to find freedom, and that efforts were made to rebuild the war-torn south. the south struggled to define who it was again, and went through many, many years of slowly chipping away the old mantle of privilege, intolerance, and a false sense of who whites and blacks were in God's eyes. it wasn't easy, and some of the scars, wounds and distances between people still remain in our nation to this very day.

i stated on my blog a number of months back that, were john mccain to win the presidency, i would pack up my arrows, roll up my sleeves, and begin working as just another american under him.

i asked most of you here if you had enough heart and integrity and interest in the lives of all americans to do the same should obama capture the vote in november.

as the final debate nears, and the election moves to just under twenty days from now, i put the question out there again for anyone who cares to weigh in.

mike rucker
fairburn, georgia, usa
mikerucker.wordpress.com

Gary Baker said...

Spud asks a question that amazes me:

"i asked most of you here if you had enough heart and integrity and interest in the lives of all americans to do the same should obama capture the vote in november."

I have yet to hear of any prominent conservative type say otherwise. I work in a pretty conservative office, and while we have discussed the possibility or probability of a democrat sweep, no one has mentioned any plans that do not involve staying put and working to continue to make this country the best and most productive in the world.

I wonder what makes some people feel that the question needs to be asked?

Christinewjc said...

Mike,

I still think that Obama needs to show proof of his natural born citizen status.

McCain did.

Why won't Obama?

Christinewjc said...

Hi Gary,

The reason why that question needs to be asked is because the Obamabots (which Mike appears not to be anymore) will riot in the streets if their "messiah" doesn't win. They will scream "racism" against white people who voted for McCain. The Obama maniacs will refuse to face the REAL reason McCain would win the election - polar opposite policy differences with Obama. But their rage will blind them and they will use the "race card" as an excuse.

I am really worried that the violence will be terribly severe if Obama doesn't win.

And, if it is found that Obama wasn't eligible in the first place because he is not a natural born citizen of the United States? I fear that the rage and violence might even be worse!

spud tooley said...

me: i asked most of you here if you had enough heart and integrity and interest in the lives of all americans to do the same should obama capture the vote in november.

gary: I have yet to hear of any prominent conservative type say otherwise.

i think i've realized your problem, gary, and it's two-fold. i thought it was just that you couldn't tell the facts from eternally spun lies. i now know that, even when you might see the facts, you fail to be able to draw the proper conclusion from them.

the facts, gary, are these: the most vocal conservative voices in america threatened earlier this year to sit out the election entirely because they were not happy about the republican nominee. then, when they saw that their wet-diaper-baby tempter tantrum wasn't getting the attention they wanted, they THEN decided they were going to vote for hillary clinton as a 'statement', even though she was, in their minds, the WORST possible person to step in and lead america.

now, the conclusion that i draw from that - and, granted, i'll probably need to talk slowly so you can keep up - but my conclusion is that, if they considered doing what they thought was the WORST thing they could do for america, then they NEVER really had america's best interests in mind at all, and that the chance of them all of a sudden deciding that they want to do something POSITIVE and help america in this most critical of moments is slim at best, and most likely nil.

what, pray tell, would you conclude from those threats from the most often quoted, listened to, and followed conservative voices in america?

the floor is yours.

mike rucker

Gary Baker said...

Spud,

As per usual your logic is somewhat "fluid" shall we say? Rather odd to say the least to use a pre-election specific example for a post election condition (as in using people who are going to vote for Hilary to protest McCain as an example of what not to do if Obama wins.)

The facts, Mike, are that expressing discontent to party leadership can be an effective way of communicating and influencing the party. For example, when Bush tried to palm off Harriet Myers as a supreme court pick, a lot of people were not happy with the choice and they said so. The result was a much better choice. Far from being an action to the country's detriment, this went at least some of the way to a court with a much higher respect for the law.

You and I obviously have different ideas on what constitutes working for a better America and working against it. Regardless of who wins, I believe that all but the most extreme nut cases on the conservative side will continue to work, to earn, to be productive, and to support the law. They will work for change in a legal manner, or barring that, they will perform civil disobedience and take their lumps.

On the other hand, if the liberals should lose, they will scream "Racism!" "Voter Suppression!" They will tie up the courts, much like they did with Bush's first victory. They will claim the courts gave the election to McCain, just like Bush (even though every recount conducted in Florida by the press showed Bush the winner).

And while this is going on, they will continue to undermine principles of free speech and debate on the college campuses, get their warped view of history in the school books, and generally teach people to hate the country that birthed them and gave them the opportunity for unparalleled success. The liberal officials will continue to press the law when it is to their own advantage and to circumvent the law when it is not. In short, they will continue to act like the fascists the college professors are training them to be. And they'll be completely convinced it's the absolute right thing to do right up until the point the power they grab is turned upon them, and they shall innocently ask "How did this happen?"

In the meantime, the much hated Christian conservative will hold the line for rule of law and Biblical truth. I don't think it can stop the direction that Obama wants to take us, but it will slow him and his ilk down.