Monday, March 16, 2009

Is It Just Me?



Or does anyone else see that the forged COLB seal in the photo above kinda looks like a picture of Satan in the middle? Nah....on second thought it looks more like a dopey looking DONKEY! Still, I can't shake the feeling that I have seen that same exact look in a cartoon character...or something.

Creepy though...huh?

What's even worse is to realize that some members of Congress have been duped into believing and trusting that Snopes has settled the matter and that the factcheck.org faked COLB is the real thing.

Other senators have decided to trample upon our U.S. Constitution and leave the matter up to the clueless voters who put this ineligible, inexperienced, neo-Marxist fraud into office.

This concerns me because Leo Donofrio has stated on his latest blog post that SCOTUS Has No Original Jurisdiction To Issue A Writ of Quo Warranto re Obama; Legal presumption in favor of natural born citizen clause and effect.

*SIGH*

Seeing that faked Hawaiian COLB and reading Leo's post that tells us Congress must be convinced to remove Obama from office shows what an uphill battle this will surely be.

Hat tips:

Photo credit: Philip: Just Another Natural Born Citizen

WorldNetDaily

Natural Born Citizen blog

*******
Update:

Then again, there's this:

3 cheers for Orly Taitz
Urgent Plea from Dr. Orly Taitz regarding Obama’s Illegal Activities
SITREP Obama Eligibility, March 15, 2009: How To Get Rid Of Him
Obama: the only US president to be sued (part I)
Where Is The Proof Obama Was Born In Hawaii?

Hat tip for list:

The Right Side of Life: Monday's Headlines

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh, no! Leaving matters up to the "clueless voters"! Wait. . .isn't that called democracy? So if the California Supreme Court overturns Prop 8 you promise you won't cry about activist judges circumventing the will of the people? (Oh, I forgot, the will of the people only counts for the stuff YOU like.)

Anonymous said...

Hmmm, Let me see the constitution says people have the right to amend it. And the constitution says the President must be a citizen.

So lets remove the president and those who want him can add an amendment that says the president does not have to be a citizen.

That is the only fair thing to do.

Or is the constitution now meaningless? and Judges are now raised to the level of Kings? Instead of somebody who follows and applies the law of the land.

Christinewjc said...

Ken,

As for your first two sentences, I have three words in response:

ACORN voter fraud

In response to your Prop 8 comment.

Look in the mirror and recite:

"the will of the people only counts for the stuff YOU like."

Christinewjc said...

Hi Wayne,

Amen!

Funny how the Democrats seem to get the rule of law and the order of Constitutional amendment a** backwards...isn't it?

So...they just run roughshod over the law of the land.

I was about to correct you regarding Obama, thinking that he must be a U.S. Citizen - just not a natural born citizen which is one of the three requirements written in the Constitution for POTUS. However, as Alan Keyes so eloquently pointed out in the video where he labels Obama a "radical communist" he asked the reporter, "Do we even know for sure if he is a citizen of the United States?"

I always ask the same question of those who come here and think they are criticizing me by labeling me a "birther." Funny thing is - they NEVER answer!!

I wear the "tin foil hat" and "birther" labels proudly. One day, either one of those terms will go down in history as those who steadfastly stood up for the U.S. Constitution while the offenders celebrated a usurper like Resident Obama - who never should have been in the office of the presidency in the first place!

One cannot create a "natural born citizen" out of thin air. One cannot be a "natural born citizen" when one's father was a citizen of Kenya under the British Nationality Act and NEVER became a U.S. Citizen himself.

The second question that remains is whether or not Obama officially naturalized back into the U.S. after living for years in Indonesia. That country does not allow dual citizenship. Therefore, his mother (and Obama Jr.) must have renounced their former citizenship (which most likely was British citizenship for Obama Jr.) in order for the young Obama (known as Barry Soetoro) to attend school there.

Mr. Barack Hussein Obama -

The American People want to know, who sent you?


Obama has lived for 48 years without leaving any footprints -- none! There is no
Obama documentation -- no records -- no paper trail -- none -- this can't be an
accident.

Original, vault copy birth certificate -- Not released

Certificate of Live Birth -- Released -- Counterfeit

Obama/Dunham marriage license -- Not released

Soetoro/Dunham marriage license -- Not released [Note: one website claims it has copies of divorce papers]

Soetoro adoption records -- Not released

Fransiskus Assisi School School application -- Released

Punahou School records -- Not released

Selective Service Registration -- Released -- Counterfeit

Occidental College records -- Not released

Passport (Pakistan) -- Not released

Columbia College records -- Not released

Columbia thesis -- Not released

Harvard College records -- Not released

Harvard Law Review articles -- None (maybe 1, unsigned?)

Baptism certificate -- None

Medical records -- Not released

Illinois State Senate records -- None

Illinois State Senate schedule -- Lost

Law practice client list -- Not released

University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None


*******

Many of these documents have been sealed. Why would such a thing be necessary if Obama/Soetoro has nothing to hide?

sh007r said...

"So if the California Supreme Court overturns Prop 8"

That would be essentially illegal, legislating from the bench.
Courts should never MAKE laws or overturn a legal and valid election which proved a majority TWICE!

We believe the constitution is NOT a document you can just rewrite as you please, why is that so hard to understand for you libs?

Christinewjc said...

Note to GMPilot -

Clean up your comment and I'll post it.

You know what I mean.

Christinewjc said...

sh007r,

Good points!

In addition, it is wrong to compare Prop. 8 with Obama's ineligibility to be POTUS because he is not a natural born citizen as is required by the U.S. Constitution.

Two different situations.

Obama was not eligible in the first place. He was not vetted properly. The DNC knew about his ineligibility, but went ahead and made him their "annointed" nominee anyway.

Now that the truth is coming out, people are very skeptical about Obama - for many reasons.

But the fact remains. If Obama Sr. was Obama Jr.'s father - then he was NEVER eligible for POTUS. Obama Sr. was a citizen of Kenya - under the British Nationality Act. He never even became a U.S. Citizen!

The Prop. 8 vote doesn't have any "eligibility" problems.

If the other side wants the CA Constitution changed, then they have to place it back on the ballot for another vote.

I have read elsewhere that ever since Prop. 8 passed, even MORE people in CA agree that marriage should remain as the union of one man and one woman.

No rights were taken away from homosexuals. They just cannot use the term "marriage" for their unions.

GMpilot said...

No, actually, I don't.

I didn't say s*******, or g********, or m***********, or h****, or even a Shakespearean d****.

OTOH, I've read comments from you such as:

"ineligible, inexperienced, neo-Marxist fraud"
"...Democrats seem to get the rule of law...a** backwards"

...and that's just this week!

If you're going to hide behind your phrases of choice but not allow me to use mine, then you're a h********.
In any case, my answer still stands: "Is It Just Me?" Yes, it is.