Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Barack Obama vs. The Law [add-on]

The Right Side of Life has a report about an upcoming documentary called "Barack Obama vs. The Law

Excerpt:

Evil Conservative Radio and NMATV have teamed up to produce an upcoming documentary, “Barack Obama v. The Law”:
Dr. Orly Taitz, Attorney Mario Apuzzo, and WOR talk show host Steve Malzberg make the case about Barack Obama and his eligibility for the presidency. Produced and directed for NMATV by Bob Parks.

RedState also chimes in:

I am not personally convinced the birth certificate is an issue, but I have to say, I have no leg to stand on but my “feeling” that it isn’t relevant because we’ve not seen actual birth certificate to butress my “feeling.” So, what do I tell people that insist this is an important issue?
I have nothing logical to tell them to disabuse them of their notion because I can’t prove them wrong.
So, why won’t Obama just publish the real birth certificate?



Hat Tip:

The Right Side of Life

*******
Update:

Obama is a TERRIBLE LIAR, TOO!

Obama's Shattered Dreams

Hat Tip:

TD Blog

19 comments:

Matt W. said...

They do raise a very good point, if it's all legitimate, why not just furnish the proof. It's not like we're talking about a couple of tin foil hat wearing freaks claiming he's a space alien, we're talking about several million average American citizens with very serious questions about the legitimacy of the POTUS to hold that office.

Christine, you know that I've really not been too impressed with this issue, but I have to agree, if it's legit, just prove it. He does owe the American people that much, after all, he's supposed to be serving us.

ZachJonesishome said...

Thanks. I look forward to seeing it. I'll probably link to here tomorrow. The second speaker's statement that no hospital has come forward to say Obama was born here is an extremely good point. In Hawaii, hospitals would have been falling over themselves to claim the birth of Obama - unless there is not one hospital that can prove the claim. Excellent point.

Francis said...

There is no reason Mario Apuzzo should be the slightest confused on that issue. Hospitals are subject to a set of privacy laws called HIPPA. They are not allowed to tell anybody who was born there or any other treatment information. Kapiolani Medical Center (where Obama was born) has been chomping at the bit to claim him... dropping every hint they legally can...but they are forbidden by law by coming right out with it.

Euripides said...

This does make a good point. What's Obama got to be afraid of, except the validation of his citizenship?

Francis said...

What's Obama got to be afraid of? Other than a proliferation of nuisance lawsuits should the concept of legal standing be nullified?

Probably nothing.

Christinewjc said...

Matt,

I know that this isn't your favorite topic. However, notice that it is not going away. In fact, it is heating up day by day because more people are becoming aware of it. It IS a legitimate issue - even if government people want to dismiss it as trivial. Our U.S. Constitution is as stake - on the "natural born citizen" issue as well as many of the horrible policies and exec. orders that Obama is pushing through. He MUST be stopped...somehow! I don't care which issue gets it done - but whichever it is - it will one day be found that he wasn't eligible for POTUS in the first place.

Christinewjc said...

Zach,

I agree. There is no reason for a hospital NOT to celebrate that he was born there - if, in fact, it were true. We already know that his Kenyan step grandmother admitted that she witnessed his birth in Kenya. The Kenyan ambassador also leaked that info in an improptu interview with two American radio talk show hosts. Apparently, they made a shrine near his place of birth.

Even if all of this can't be proven, the FACT that his father was born in Kenya and NEVER immigrated to America PROVES that Obama Jr. can't be a "natural born citizen."

Christinewjc said...

Francis,

I don't think that your information is correct. Even if true, the facts presented in The Obama Timeline and Barack Hussein Obama - A Natural Born Subject of Great Britain demonstrate that if, in fact, Barack Obama Sr. is his biological father, then Obama Jr. cannot possibly be a "natural born citizen" of the United States of America and is therefore, according to Article II Section 5, ineligible for POTUS.

GMpilot said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
GMpilot said...

It'll probably be a best seller in certain circles, just as The Clinton Chronicles was in the 1990s.

Probably just as accurate, too...which is to say, not very.
But go have your fun.

John Kubicek said...

Obama learned everything from Saul Alinsky, and has taught that "wisdom" to his own minions. Alinsky's strategy is to attack the messenger, not the message. If the message is attacked, it means that the message has to be repeated (in the media). So, instead, they attack the messenger.

Well, in this case of the eligibility issue, that strategy has been used more than I've ever seen before. You would only have to see the negative reactions regarding stories like this on venues like digg.com, where they use the deragatory term, "birthers," and do all they can to bash such media sources as WorldNetDaily and the founder, Joseph Farah.

Please keep it in mind, because as we bring up the question of Obam-uh's Constitutional eligibility, we will be attacked.

Gary Baker said...

"What's Obama got to be afraid of? Other than a proliferation of nuisance lawsuits should the concept of legal standing be nullified?"

Hardly a realistic concern. Generally, the requirements for standing are that a) you have been harmed or potentially harmed, and b) the law can provide some type of recompense. It seems to me that it some type of fraud has occurred (mind you, I am not making a claim one or the other on that), then any registered voter should have "standing" since they would have been "harmed" by a fraudulent candidate. Far from nullifying the concept of standing, allowing the suit to proceed would seem to uphold the concept. If the court does verify that the citizenship is valid, then the immunity granted to high officials in general should dispose of any other lawsuits. If the claim of eligibility is found to be fraudulent, then it seems to me that lawsuits would be the least of Mr. Obama's problems.

Anonymous said...

Francis - I'm assuming you are referring to HIPAA guidelines, not HIPPA.

Unfortunately, for Obama, HIPAA was not in affect until well AFTER his birth. In order for the hospital to have withheld information on his mother's admittance in 1961, she would have had to sign a paper saying she didn't want to receive calls via the telephone switchboard. That was about all that was available for privacy in 1961.

And again, unfortunately for Obama, HIPAA is NOT retroactive.

Nice try though~

Christinewjc said...

Hi John,

So true. Attacking the messenger (e.g. Rush Limbaugh) instead of the message (that he doesn't want our nation to be taken over by neo-Marxist Fascism) is what the leftist liberals do. They learned quite well from all of the Alinsky types in colleges and universities over the past 39 years.

We are now reaping the terrible consequences of their lying, cheating and awful Constitution-destroying policies.

Still praying for the removal of Obama due to ineligibility.

Nice to see you here! I don't miss Digg. Found it too annoying to deal with the ObamaBorg Bot children over there.

Thanks for stopping by and sharing your words of wisdom!

Sincerely,
Christine

Christinewjc said...

Hey Gary,

Have you heard that there is now suspicion that a clerk at the Supreme Court (Danny Bickel) may have tampered with some of the cases (supposedly) brought to conference and the judges never saw them? This has come out as a result of Orly Taitz approaching both Justice Scalia (at a book signing) and Chief Justice Roberts (at a college lecture) where she asked questions about her case being taken off the website docket schedule, then reappearing only after people complained. There are more details, but the gist of it is that the Justices didn't know what case Dr. Taitz was talking about! It will be interesting to see if anything happens as a result of these two Justices finally getting the case arguments and all of the evidence that she has collected about Obama's fake birth certificate etc.

If you have been following the cases that were brought to conference (i.e. Leo Donofrio, Philip Berg, Orly's) then you know that they were declined for full hearing due to "standing." Could it be that this clerk tampered with them all?? Just speculation on my part - but it appears to be VERY SUSPICIOUS!

Thanks for sharing your knowledge and insights.

Sincerely,
Christine

Christinewjc said...

Euripides wrote:

"This does make a good point. What's Obama got to be afraid of, except the validation of his citizenship?"

I just read your comment again today. Very cleverly put! It shows how ridiculous it would be for Obama to seal his documents if he had nothing to hide!

Thanks for sharing that!

Sincerely,
Christine

Christinewjc said...

Anonymous,

Thanks for sharing that bit of information. I was wondering, could you post what "HIPAA guidelines" means and share some details?

Thanks.

Christinewjc said...

Gary,

Here is a copy of a post from Dr. Orly Taitz that gives more details about what I was trying to describe to you in my last comment:

DEFENDOURFREEDOMS.US published a new entry entitled “I need volunteers to make phone calls” on 4/1/2009 9:08:14 AM, written by Dr. Orly Taitz.

I need volunteers to make phone calls
Volunteer action needed

I need volunteers to call

Eric Holder-Att Gen
Elena Kagan -Solicitor General
Robert Mueller -director of FBI
Marc Sullivan-Director of Secret Service

We need an immediate response from Eric Holder- whether he will institute Quo Warranto proceedings against Obama, whether he will appoint a special prosecutor to investigate all of the criminal activities surrounding Obama. He has no right to sweep this under the rug, It is a matter of National urgency, a matter of National security. He has a duty to institute a quo Warranto proceedings and to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate all the criminal activity related to Obama and his supporters. If he is not doing that, he needs to resign immediately or be removed immediately. His inaction equals to aiding and abetting all of the crimes committed and he himself will need to be indicted, tried and convicted to the full extend of the law.

Similarly, Elena Kagan, Robert Mueller and Marc Sullivan owe us answers, they are aiding and abetting this massive fraud, treason and other suspected crimes, committed by Obama and his supporters.

I have received a letter from the chief clerk of the Supreme Court William K Sutter- he is stating that they will not review quo warranto, but I can refile as Extraordinary petition for a writ of Mandamus. While there is nothing in the rules saying that they cannot hear quo warranto, just to move things along, I am rewriting the complaint and will submit it as an Extraordinary Petition for the writ of Mandamus. I still did not get an answer from the Chief Justice Roberts in regards to all the illegal activity going on in the Supreme Court. Please call the Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts, Chief Clerk William Sutter, chief of the police security for the Supreme Court officer Christine Giaccio 202-479-2369. What has been going on in the Supreme Court is the biggest scandal in our Judiciary system. This people have no right to sweep this under the rug all of these illegal activities, they owe American people answers

1. Who erased from the Supreme Court exterior docket information about my case Lightfoot v Bowen, right after the inauguration of Obama, while other cases where on the docket? This is particularly suspicious because my case stated that Obama is not eligible for presidency, and other cases remained on the docket .

2. What investigation was done on this issue?

3. Who is the police officer or Secret Service Agent or FBI agent in charge of this investigation?

4. What administrative action was done against clerk Danny Bickel, who refused to put on the docket and forward to Chief Justice Roberts and other Justices my second supplemental brief?

5. Why didn’t Justice Scalia know anything about four cases dealing with Obama’s illegitimacy for presidency supposedly heard in 5 conferences? Did the clerks hide those cases from the justices? Did the Justices actually discuss those cases in conferences? Where are the decisions signed by Justice Scalia, when he supposedly read the cases and forwarded them to three out of five conferences? Did Justice Scalia sign those decisions, or were those signatures forged? How could he read five pleadings about something that important ans illegitimacy of the president and know nothing about it?

6. Did all nine justices sign the decision not to hear these cases on the merits, if so, they would’ve known the cases? Did somebody forge their signatures? Did clerks intentionally misrepresented the cases to put foreign National, citizen of Indonesia and possibly still citizen of Kenya Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama in the White House and keep him there by trampling on the Constitution and rule of law?

7. If all of the above officials refuse to provide immediate answers and action, they, themselves are guilty of aiding and abetting this massive fraud, treason and all the other related crimes and they will need to be prosecuted and punished to the full extend of the law.

Permalink: defendourfreedoms.us/2009/04/01/i-need-volunteers-to-make-phone-calls.aspx

Gary Baker said...

Christine,

Sorry about replying in such a tardy fashion. No, I've not heard anything about case tampering. It would not surprise me, considering that some people backing Obama have broken into other private records. It's rather odd: Obama has been compared to Lincoln and Kennedy. I think Jackson is more appropriate. Even if corruption is not linked directly to him, there certainly are a lot of crooks backing him.

I gave up on following anything to do with the birth certificate controversy. I don't know if there as any validity to it, but I believe that it will never get traction. If the Supreme court intervened in the presidency, there would be riots in this country such as have not been seen in decades. We already have quite a lot on our plates. I'm willing to just ride it out.