Sarah Palin's yet-to-be-released new book entitled, Going Rogue - An American Life is already a best seller in the current pre-sale category! According to Politico:
The phrase has its roots in an Oct. 25 story by Slate's John Dickerson, with the lead: "Has Sarah Palin "gone rogue"?"
I can't wait to get my copy and read more about this remarkable woman! I have enjoyed reading her Facebook essays and was very impressed with her speech in Hong Kong. Despite the fact that the Slate article (written back in Oct. 2008) writer had obvious contempt for Sarah and nothing but praise for ObamaMASK, I wonder if the author would have written that article differently today?
IMO, Sarah Palin has more integrity in her pinky finger than Obama has ever had in his entire adult life. She has the values and ethics that seem missing from Obama. She tells the truth; whereas Obama is an obvious continual liar. She presents herself as a REAL, GENUINE PERSON rather than the teleprompter puppet-with-a-mask Obama who continues to pay over 1.5 million dollars to a team of lawyers to prevent the release of documents that could prove, once and for all, whether or not he was eligible for the position of POTUS in the first place.
Sarah would NEVER have spent taxpayer money so frivolously as Obama and the Dem majority in Congress have done. Sarah gave up her jet as governor of Alaska; Obama spends 2.5 million dollars on his jet and the jet that brought Oprah and his wife to Copenhagen to bid for the 2016 Olympics in Chicago. Glenn Beck's show (and talk radio show pundits) have all revealed the REAL reason why Obama did this - to pay back his corrupt cronies in Chicago who helped get him elected.
I ask you. If George W. Bush did the exact same thing while he was president in order to get the Olympics to come to his home state of Texas, what do you think that the Fringe Media of Mass Deception would have done?
It will be quite interesting to see how Palin handles all of her critics in her book. Maybe there is time left for her to include something about how much of a lying, cheating, sexual pig David Letterman is? Can you believe that snake had the gall to mock and degrade Sarah Palin and her daughters when he was guilty of adultery with several women in his employ? Disgusting!
I am so grateful to God that we have a Christian Conservative woman - who is happily married with children - and knows how to turn this nation back towards the right direction. Whatever her plans are for the future, I will support her all the way! With God's help and the Holy Spirit leading the way in Sarah's life, we can be joyful again in this nation!
In whatever capacity and direction Sarah chooses to go, she will help lift our nation out of the cesspool of corruption that Obama and his cronies have sunk us into. His legacy will end up in the trash heap of history as the attempt to make our Constitutional Republic into an oppressive, Marxist state of tyranny. Notice I said "attempt." Patriots across America are standing up and letting their voices be heard! And to borrow a phrase from former President George W. Bush, "they [in this context - meaning Congress] will hear from all of us soon" at the ballot box in 2010!
In a post back in August, I wrote about the fact that - America Needs a Mother Very, Very Badly. Sarah Palin definitely fits the bill. She is good, smart, intelligent, forthright, and truthful in character. She is a wonderful person on the national scene who hasn't been corrupted.
She is a living demonstration of a person who possesses the 9 principles and 12 values of the 9.12 Project. She also knows how to govern and run a state successfully - not run our nation into the ground as Obama has been doing. She would have been far better in the role of POTUS than Obama, simply because she has far more experience in how to govern. Obama continues in his stupid juvenile teleprompter crutched campaign mode, and Americans are now seeing that he couldn't run any business successfully - no less our nation!
If it is Sarah's goal to run for president in 2012, she has my vote and I will work and pray for her election to be successful!
At the end of last Friday's [9/25/09] "A Mother's Challenge" show, Frank Luntz reiterated my "America needs a mom" sentiment when he stated: "Start everything you say with, 'As a mom'...and you win!"
Hat Tip:
Politico.com
*******
Update:
Immediately after publishing this post, I read from News.BBC.co.uk:
1632: Not a huge surprise to see Tokyo drop out there - they entered today as big underdogs to win the bid - but could we be looking at a surprise to come, and Madrid pipping Rio de Janeiro?
1629: It comes down, then, to Rio de Janeiro and Madrid for the hosts of the 2016 Olympic Games.
TOKYO ELIMINATED FROM THE 2016 HOST CITY VOTE
1625: Well, isn't that a turn up for the books? Chicago are eliminated in the first round - cue audible gasps around the auditorium - and a second round of voting opens immediately.
CHICAGO DROPS OUT OF THE 2016 HOST CITY VOTING PROCESS
1623: The vote closes and the scrutineers are now checking the results. If there is no majority for one city, remember, the city with the least votes will drop out and another vote will take place.
1622: The first round of voting for the 2016 Olympic Games host city is declared open.
Chicago DROPPED OUT???? Or, is that the verbiage being shared in order for the Obamas and Oprah to save face on their multi-million dollar taxpayer funded joyride to Copenhagen?
What a waste!!
More:
BBC News' Adam Brookes in Chicago: "The shock of Chicago's elimination was greater for the fact that it came in the first round. And greater for the fact that President Obama had taken valuable hours from his packed and tense political schedule to travel to Copenhagen. His legendary powers of persuasion will be said to have failed him, though in reality it will be Chicago's bid that failed him. Nonetheless, this is a moment which allows the president's detractors to allege waning prestige on the part of his presidency. And it will raise questions about the political advice that he is receiving."
Posts
4 comments:
Hi Christine,
You ask: "I ask you. If George W. Bush did the exact same thing while he was president in order to get the Olympics to come to his home state of Texas, what do you think that the Fringe Media of Mass Deception would have done?"
Well, George Bush met with the U.S. Bid Committee to get the Olympics to Chicago. Here is what Bush said: "And so I -- this country supports your bid, strongly. And our hope is that the judges will take a good look at Chicago and select Chicago for the 2016 Olympics." By the way, this is from Jan. 7, 2008 (http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2008/01/20080107-3.html)
The selection of Chicago as a city for a possible Olympics was done way, way before Obama ran for President. So the choice of Chicago had nothing to do with him. It was chance (or the vote of the American people) who selected President Obama, who just happens to be from Chicago.
Thanks for that additional information, but I think that you are missing my point.
The main point that I was making was that the media would have excoriated Bush for spending over 2.5 million of taxpayer money for TWO JETS - which was totally unnecessary - and for using all that jet fuel which spewed tons of carbon monoxide into the atmosphere. They newscasters would have criticized Bush just because they hate him so much. The media loves Obama - therefore in their eyes "he can do no wrong."
What a joke!
They keep those ideological blinders on and keep drinking the ObamaBORG Kool-Aid while our nation suffers under his naivete' and terrible policies.
IMO, all three could have gone over on Oprah's plane at her expense. She's a billionaire! That would have been more like a genuine sacrifice - not the silly excuse that Michelle complained about.
On second thought, 2.5 million dollars would have been a drop in the bucket for Oprah. Wouldn't it have been nice if she donated that amount to a homeless shelter? She could have stated that she donated that exact amount to offset the carbon credits? Al Gore would have approved - even though I think he is a big idiot.
Hi Christine,
The Olympics bring billions of dollars to a city along with many jobs. There is nothing wrong with that. I lived in Sydney when the Olympics were there in 2000. It brought in a huge amount in tourism. This would have helped the U.S. economy in 2016. Imagine what would have been said if he didn't try. I can just hear it now.
Most hosts of the Olympics actually SPEND more money than they make! I recently heard that one of the Olympic countries from the past (can't recall which one) took seven years to pay off the debt that hosting the Olympics caused!
In our current economic crisis, hosting the Olympics isn't a smart economic endeavor.
Post a Comment